Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"When it comes to humility, I'm the greatest." -- Bullwinkle Moose


tech / sci.electronics.design / Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

SubjectAuthor
* BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
+- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelswhit3rd
+* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
|+* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
||+* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
|||`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
||| `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
|||  `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsbitrex
||`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsHul Tytus
|| `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelspiglet
||  +- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsHul Tytus
||  +- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
||  +- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn S
||  +* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
||  |`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelspiglet
||  | `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
||  |  `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
||  `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
||   `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelswhit3rd
||    `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
||     +- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
||     +* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelswhit3rd
||     |`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Walliker
||     | +* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
||     | |`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Walliker
||     | | `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
||     | `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
||     |  +* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Walliker
||     |  |`- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
||     |  `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
||     |   `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
||     +* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
||     |`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
||     | `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
||     |  `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
||     |   `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
||     |    +* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
||     |    |`- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
||     |    `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelske...@kjwdesigns.com
||     |     `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
||     |      `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
||     |       `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
||     |        `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
||     |         `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
||     |          `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
||     |           `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
||     `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelspiglet
||      `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
|`- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJan Panteltje
`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
 `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
  +* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
  |+* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsArie de Muijnck
  ||+* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
  |||`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
  ||| `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
  |||  `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
  |||   +* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelswhit3rd
  |||   |`- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
  |||   +* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
  |||   |`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
  |||   | `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
  |||   `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn S
  |||    `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin
  ||`* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsDon
  || `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
  ||  `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsDon
  ||   `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPhil Hobbs
  |+- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsMartin Brown
  |`- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelswhit3rd
  `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsJohn Larkin
   `* Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsPiotr Wyderski
    `- Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levelsjlarkin

Pages:123
BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96696&group=sci.electronics.design#96696

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.neostrada.pl!unt-exc-02.news.neostrada.pl!wsisiz.edu.pl!.POSTED.h82-143-146-166-static.e-wro.net.pl!not-for-mail
From: bomb...@protonmail.com (Piotr Wyderski)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 20:39:08 +0200
Organization: http://www.wit.edu.pl
Message-ID: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 18:39:22 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl; posting-host="h82-143-146-166-static.e-wro.net.pl:82.143.146.166";
logging-data="961453"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@wsisiz.edu.pl"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220511-14, 5/11/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Received-Bytes: 2176
 by: Piotr Wyderski - Wed, 11 May 2022 18:39 UTC

Hi,

I am experimenting with ultra-low power ideas and I was able to simulate
a 30Hz relaxation oscillator running at 45nA/1V. I am waiting for the
delivery of high-value resistors, but the same oscillator with resistors
scaled down 10x works on the bench and consumes ~380nA/3V/360Hz which is
still pretty awesome.

This real device has been made of BSS123/BSS84 operating in the
subthreshold realm -- the highest AC p-p voltage I can observe is
~500mV. There is a lot of interesting papers on subthreshold mode, so it
is all good.

But, out of curiosity, I replaced the FETs with BC847C/BC857C and it
appears to work (in LTSpice!) even better, with V_BE sort of 350mV.
I admit, no prototype so far. I didn't expect this -- could you please
you recommend me some good book/papers on BJTs operated at nA levels?
I would like to learn the theory in a proper way, as inferring it from a
SPICE behavioural model might not be the best way to go. For example, it
looks like the beta is extremely high there, even exponential. Does this
BJT mode have a googlable name?

Best regards, Piotr

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<0c31afec-182a-424c-9527-602ca44492c1n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96700&group=sci.electronics.design#96700

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1007:b0:2f3:ce52:25cb with SMTP id d7-20020a05622a100700b002f3ce5225cbmr20578468qte.575.1652296541426;
Wed, 11 May 2022 12:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d08e:0:b0:64a:9f33:8a90 with SMTP id
h136-20020a25d08e000000b0064a9f338a90mr21558993ybg.358.1652296541221; Wed, 11
May 2022 12:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 12:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.221.140.126; posting-account=vKQm_QoAAADOaDCYsqOFDAW8NJ8sFHoE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.221.140.126
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0c31afec-182a-424c-9527-602ca44492c1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
From: whit...@gmail.com (whit3rd)
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 19:15:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: whit3rd - Wed, 11 May 2022 19:15 UTC

On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 11:39:29 AM UTC-7, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experimenting with ultra-low power ideas and I was able to simulate
> a 30Hz relaxation oscillator running at 45nA/1V.
....
> recommend me some good book/papers on BJTs operated at nA levels?
> I would like to learn the theory in a proper way, as inferring it from a
> SPICE behavioural model might not be the best way to go. For example, it
> looks like the beta is extremely high there, even exponential. Does this
> BJT mode have a googlable name?

Alas, it's a region that has high dependence on collector leakage currents
(and cosmic rays, etc). Some of the space-rated research does get into
this, because radiation damage moves the effects into higher-current parts
of the characteristic. Beta is 'high' because the collector leakage is
adding to the external base wire's contribution. It takes negative base bias
to get an 'off' state, through Rbb resistance (base spreading resistance).

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96702&group=sci.electronics.design#96702

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:17:51 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 12:17:51 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 39
X-Trace: sv3-U1afNhwFjSSDWLeDT8kzr1p0Mtfnreclqj6Ndn390gW2qluwwtf4aNzCV2V71r6S7q5rqvV6Ync+8XB!zSQGswx/iJsKVgz+U2wv3McZgJdZd6C/3E3BtQEy8u3+Lknr86V5vA+XiYR0z+2Z5WHifmcrQBZx!NrzB1g==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2693
 by: John Larkin - Wed, 11 May 2022 19:17 UTC

On Wed, 11 May 2022 20:39:08 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
<bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I am experimenting with ultra-low power ideas and I was able to simulate
>a 30Hz relaxation oscillator running at 45nA/1V. I am waiting for the
>delivery of high-value resistors, but the same oscillator with resistors
>scaled down 10x works on the bench and consumes ~380nA/3V/360Hz which is
>still pretty awesome.
>
>This real device has been made of BSS123/BSS84 operating in the
>subthreshold realm -- the highest AC p-p voltage I can observe is
>~500mV. There is a lot of interesting papers on subthreshold mode, so it
>is all good.
>
>But, out of curiosity, I replaced the FETs with BC847C/BC857C and it
>appears to work (in LTSpice!) even better, with V_BE sort of 350mV.
>I admit, no prototype so far. I didn't expect this -- could you please
>you recommend me some good book/papers on BJTs operated at nA levels?
>I would like to learn the theory in a proper way, as inferring it from a
>SPICE behavioural model might not be the best way to go. For example, it
>looks like the beta is extremely high there, even exponential. Does this
>BJT mode have a googlable name?
>
> Best regards, Piotr
>
>

There is a niche of building oscillators that run at very low supply
voltages, ballpark 10 mV. I think jfets do pretty good.

A depletion PHEMT might be good too.

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<t5h2fl$teok$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96703&group=sci.electronics.design#96703

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!pasdenom.info!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.neostrada.pl!unt-exc-01.news.neostrada.pl!wsisiz.edu.pl!.POSTED.h82-143-146-166-static.e-wro.net.pl!not-for-mail
From: bomb...@protonmail.com (Piotr Wyderski)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 21:23:17 +0200
Organization: http://www.wit.edu.pl
Message-ID: <t5h2fl$teok$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 19:23:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl; posting-host="h82-143-146-166-static.e-wro.net.pl:82.143.146.166";
logging-data="965396"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@wsisiz.edu.pl"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com>
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220511-14, 5/11/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Received-Bytes: 1750
 by: Piotr Wyderski - Wed, 11 May 2022 19:23 UTC

John Larkin wrote:

> There is a niche of building oscillators that run at very low supply
> voltages, ballpark 10 mV. I think jfets do pretty good.

Yes, there are several interesting examples. The lowest voltage I know
of is 20mV. But in this off-time research application related to the
recent CeraCharge purchase I am trying to minimize current consumption,
not voltage. It can stop oscillating at 1.2V, no problem with that. But
if the current could be as low as 20nA, that would be something.

Best regards, Piotr

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<fh4o7hlfrusqe19n2ovnn8csj5neg2kndr@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96704&group=sci.electronics.design#96704

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:49:05 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 12:49:05 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <fh4o7hlfrusqe19n2ovnn8csj5neg2kndr@4ax.com>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com> <t5h2fl$teok$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 29
X-Trace: sv3-ZlK561Rz4JCsHRA1ReIa9+++OaLZUdQD4QZh7U5/FNUB9qSsFLUy9XjIlkBfuZbaoQfKOntl7UQ+22J!f05XNooccLTQH/x/BM1mbRzyWb8+rI4FkjZbgMT64rqkjVCkh4QhkoFAqlIIs2SlvEPd/ioH9nPs!7sLmDQ==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2205
 by: John Larkin - Wed, 11 May 2022 19:49 UTC

On Wed, 11 May 2022 21:23:17 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
<bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:

>John Larkin wrote:
>
>> There is a niche of building oscillators that run at very low supply
>> voltages, ballpark 10 mV. I think jfets do pretty good.
>
>Yes, there are several interesting examples. The lowest voltage I know
>of is 20mV. But in this off-time research application related to the
>recent CeraCharge purchase I am trying to minimize current consumption,
>not voltage. It can stop oscillating at 1.2V, no problem with that. But
>if the current could be as low as 20nA, that would be something.
>
> Best regards, Piotr

The AOE X-chapter book has some data on using BJTs at pA levels.
Section 2x.9

2N4401 holds up pretty well at Ic of 100 pA. I'd expect some very
small RF transistors to be pretty good.

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96707&group=sci.electronics.design#96707

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pcdhSpam...@electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 17:04:37 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a63e192dd8a704d750a6c32eeea8549a";
logging-data="4233"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mGq9mWMv02/utMUaFinvr"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:R0kgnvgszeQmDsmC06FA/cRlFa4=
In-Reply-To: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
 by: Phil Hobbs - Wed, 11 May 2022 21:04 UTC

Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experimenting with ultra-low power ideas and I was able to simulate
> a 30Hz relaxation oscillator running at 45nA/1V. I am waiting for the
> delivery of high-value resistors, but the same oscillator with resistors
> scaled down 10x works on the bench and consumes ~380nA/3V/360Hz which is
> still pretty awesome.
>
> This real device has been made of BSS123/BSS84 operating in the
> subthreshold realm -- the highest AC p-p voltage I can observe is
> ~500mV. There is a lot of interesting papers on subthreshold mode, so it
> is all good.
>
> But, out of curiosity, I replaced the FETs with BC847C/BC857C and it
> appears to work (in LTSpice!) even better, with V_BE sort of 350mV.
> I admit, no prototype so far. I didn't expect this -- could you please
> you recommend me some good book/papers on BJTs operated at nA levels?
> I would like to learn the theory in a proper way, as inferring it from a
> SPICE behavioural model might not be the best way to go. For example, it
> looks like the beta is extremely high there, even exponential. Does this
> BJT mode have a googlable name?
>
>     Best regards, Piotr

Lots of small BJTs work fine in the low nanoamps. I've used BFT25As as
transdiodes down to 5 nA or so. They crapped out about 1 nA.

The transconductance is a lot better than FETs down there!

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<4234d0c1-b8f9-ad1c-cd6d-a9abc8a60c70@electrooptical.net>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96708&group=sci.electronics.design#96708

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 16:14:09 -0500
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com>
<t5h2fl$teok$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<fh4o7hlfrusqe19n2ovnn8csj5neg2kndr@4ax.com>
From: pcdhSpam...@electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Message-ID: <4234d0c1-b8f9-ad1c-cd6d-a9abc8a60c70@electrooptical.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 17:14:08 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fh4o7hlfrusqe19n2ovnn8csj5neg2kndr@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 42
X-Trace: sv3-fPRYzP8SIX4jTqkq7kELnB/A6tsmBVaHcoKB0ta/1mgMCGa48Wf17TmPO1q22hPRANPkBQf07j2hLUM!+YTVh/noBuxIyNF4IlToLnYq4SHxxZYm9Y6v4qiB16Tk0k2MNneNmXJLWal/RZc2dV6j/EBsERfF!TY+OASm0PMNf/3j9WOLTsw==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2588
 by: Phil Hobbs - Wed, 11 May 2022 21:14 UTC

John Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2022 21:23:17 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
> <bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
>> John Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> There is a niche of building oscillators that run at very low supply
>>> voltages, ballpark 10 mV. I think jfets do pretty good.
>>
>> Yes, there are several interesting examples. The lowest voltage I know
>> of is 20mV. But in this off-time research application related to the
>> recent CeraCharge purchase I am trying to minimize current consumption,
>> not voltage. It can stop oscillating at 1.2V, no problem with that. But
>> if the current could be as low as 20nA, that would be something.
>>
>> Best regards, Piotr
>
> The AOE X-chapter book has some data on using BJTs at pA levels.
> Section 2x.9
>
> 2N4401 holds up pretty well at Ic of 100 pA. I'd expect some very
> small RF transistors to be pretty good.
>
>
>

The f_T goes in the tank--at 1 nA, even a BFT25A is a < 1-MHz transistor.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96709&group=sci.electronics.design#96709

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.freedyn.de!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.neostrada.pl!unt-exc-02.news.neostrada.pl!wsisiz.edu.pl!.POSTED.h82-143-146-166-static.e-wro.net.pl!not-for-mail
From: bomb...@protonmail.com (Piotr Wyderski)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 23:38:24 +0200
Organization: http://www.wit.edu.pl
Message-ID: <t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 21:38:38 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl; posting-host="h82-143-146-166-static.e-wro.net.pl:82.143.146.166";
logging-data="976946"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@wsisiz.edu.pl"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220511-14, 5/11/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Received-Bytes: 1903
 by: Piotr Wyderski - Wed, 11 May 2022 21:38 UTC

Phil Hobbs wrote:

> Lots of small BJTs work fine in the low nanoamps.  I've used BFT25As as
> transdiodes down to 5 nA or so.  They crapped out about 1 nA.

This is getting really interesting. I didn't know that BJTs have useful
subthreshold region too.

> The transconductance is a lot better than FETs down there!

Indeed, Spice appears to say the same. I need to build a JFET probe in
order not to disturb the single electron microcosmos down there with a
dingy default 1Meg probe. And grab some radial resistors in the range of
47Meg+, as I don't fancy the idea of connecting hordes of 4.7Meg ones to
get there.

Best regards, Piotr

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<bido7h95oc65ckqqgbnpsp46k1uo6qu64l@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96711&group=sci.electronics.design#96711

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 17:21:04 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 15:21:04 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <bido7h95oc65ckqqgbnpsp46k1uo6qu64l@4ax.com>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com> <t5h2fl$teok$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <fh4o7hlfrusqe19n2ovnn8csj5neg2kndr@4ax.com> <4234d0c1-b8f9-ad1c-cd6d-a9abc8a60c70@electrooptical.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 47
X-Trace: sv3-i6oUOk6R3+L58syMN85bSfYw5D65gwvPZbyKYnRouV7KkGbySg/QUdQmN4kkVhwKiuWuvjEuna3s6p+!P00XEnSDEPGgUId30oUkMKicaMNB1wJ3zGTXXcpYGNiFbuHIU74KLCK9/I2z6scYLQ53duXjQ0pu!C2q9tA==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2707
 by: John Larkin - Wed, 11 May 2022 22:21 UTC

On Wed, 11 May 2022 17:14:08 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

>John Larkin wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 May 2022 21:23:17 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
>> <bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> John Larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is a niche of building oscillators that run at very low supply
>>>> voltages, ballpark 10 mV. I think jfets do pretty good.
>>>
>>> Yes, there are several interesting examples. The lowest voltage I know
>>> of is 20mV. But in this off-time research application related to the
>>> recent CeraCharge purchase I am trying to minimize current consumption,
>>> not voltage. It can stop oscillating at 1.2V, no problem with that. But
>>> if the current could be as low as 20nA, that would be something.
>>>
>>> Best regards, Piotr
>>
>> The AOE X-chapter book has some data on using BJTs at pA levels.
>> Section 2x.9
>>
>> 2N4401 holds up pretty well at Ic of 100 pA. I'd expect some very
>> small RF transistors to be pretty good.
>>
>>
>>
>
>The f_T goes in the tank--at 1 nA, even a BFT25A is a < 1-MHz transistor.
>
>Cheers
>
>Phil Hobbs

Well, 1 pA into 1 pF gets you 1 volt per second. Speed takes power.

Big savings on heat sinks!

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96715&group=sci.electronics.design#96715

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 17:30:02 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 15:30:02 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net> <t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 26
X-Trace: sv3-CihWyDnxB5TjXzVTxeoJNoRBB1OxR/m2ZQnohbKD1BGaV69ppTM9OsmU0gxYPP9LqVSRIE+fBMH927u!65ADb1ELQJBGqcuTEJr4V0yfqDylH2491q6Z0nHctG1LUoNyuuXNDo5UQBWzua97aW7XSYyS9s6I!cHT32Q==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2132
 by: John Larkin - Wed, 11 May 2022 22:30 UTC

On Wed, 11 May 2022 23:38:24 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
<bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:

>Phil Hobbs wrote:
>
>> Lots of small BJTs work fine in the low nanoamps.  I've used BFT25As as
>> transdiodes down to 5 nA or so.  They crapped out about 1 nA.
>
>This is getting really interesting. I didn't know that BJTs have useful
>subthreshold region too.

I was theorizing that an LED, at low current, wouldn't have enough
voltage across it to make visible photons. A typical green LED runs
about 80 mV per decade current.

I tried some green LEDs at 1 nA and they made visible light.

I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
second.

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<g7eo7h1pbc29akenj8aqnv1cfc3ojhonkv@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96716&group=sci.electronics.design#96716

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 17:31:17 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 15:31:17 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <g7eo7h1pbc29akenj8aqnv1cfc3ojhonkv@4ax.com>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net> <t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 26
X-Trace: sv3-ZfqQXfbZmNaH965moMfV26g1U8ISz2gy2sOsfBW3X9lywciN2JZ4xVZxuL6qwU2uCri7ooFsd+z2pSN!jORxm7j1tIPtUw6ZxNh7R/GYoE90R/5lnuo8VXIVwu6ORPXp/JzPZT4gCdZkebG0xAWFaYJ2fPgr!EkQ6rg==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2193
 by: John Larkin - Wed, 11 May 2022 22:31 UTC

On Wed, 11 May 2022 23:38:24 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
<bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:

>Phil Hobbs wrote:
>
>> Lots of small BJTs work fine in the low nanoamps.  I've used BFT25As as
>> transdiodes down to 5 nA or so.  They crapped out about 1 nA.
>
>This is getting really interesting. I didn't know that BJTs have useful
>subthreshold region too.
>
>> The transconductance is a lot better than FETs down there!
>
>Indeed, Spice appears to say the same. I need to build a JFET probe in
>order not to disturb the single electron microcosmos down there with a
>dingy default 1Meg probe. And grab some radial resistors in the range of
>47Meg+, as I don't fancy the idea of connecting hordes of 4.7Meg ones to
>get there.

I have some 1T ohm 0805 resistors. High values are available.

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<xt_eK.368$bnl3.13@fx98.iad>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96725&group=sci.electronics.design#96725

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx98.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.0
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com>
<t5h2fl$teok$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<fh4o7hlfrusqe19n2ovnn8csj5neg2kndr@4ax.com>
<4234d0c1-b8f9-ad1c-cd6d-a9abc8a60c70@electrooptical.net>
<bido7h95oc65ckqqgbnpsp46k1uo6qu64l@4ax.com>
From: use...@example.net (bitrex)
In-Reply-To: <bido7h95oc65ckqqgbnpsp46k1uo6qu64l@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <xt_eK.368$bnl3.13@fx98.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@frugalusenet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 02:41:33 UTC
Organization: frugalusenet - www.frugalusenet.com
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 22:41:31 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2909
 by: bitrex - Thu, 12 May 2022 02:41 UTC

On 5/11/2022 6:21 PM, John Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2022 17:14:08 -0400, Phil Hobbs
> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
>> John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 11 May 2022 21:23:17 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
>>> <bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John Larkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There is a niche of building oscillators that run at very low supply
>>>>> voltages, ballpark 10 mV. I think jfets do pretty good.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, there are several interesting examples. The lowest voltage I know
>>>> of is 20mV. But in this off-time research application related to the
>>>> recent CeraCharge purchase I am trying to minimize current consumption,
>>>> not voltage. It can stop oscillating at 1.2V, no problem with that. But
>>>> if the current could be as low as 20nA, that would be something.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards, Piotr
>>>
>>> The AOE X-chapter book has some data on using BJTs at pA levels.
>>> Section 2x.9
>>>
>>> 2N4401 holds up pretty well at Ic of 100 pA. I'd expect some very
>>> small RF transistors to be pretty good.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The f_T goes in the tank--at 1 nA, even a BFT25A is a < 1-MHz transistor.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Phil Hobbs
>
> Well, 1 pA into 1 pF gets you 1 volt per second. Speed takes power.
>
> Big savings on heat sinks!
>

I remember seeing a sci-fi illustration when I was a kid of an alien
species discovering the Voyager golden record many millions of years in
the future - their little scout-ships the size of what would be 1:1000
scale toys of a Space Shuttle touching down on its surface to investigate.

Those guys really got it good with respect to the energy requirements of
"manned" space travel.

I also recall an alternative interpretation of general relativity (shape
dynamics) says that time isn't relative and instead the sizes of objects
in the Universe are what's relative.

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<t5i72d$1r4fs$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96733&group=sci.electronics.design#96733

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.neostrada.pl!unt-exc-01.news.neostrada.pl!wsisiz.edu.pl!.POSTED.h82-143-146-166-static.e-wro.net.pl!not-for-mail
From: bomb...@protonmail.com (Piotr Wyderski)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 07:47:39 +0200
Organization: http://www.wit.edu.pl
Message-ID: <t5i72d$1r4fs$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
<t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<g7eo7h1pbc29akenj8aqnv1cfc3ojhonkv@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 05:47:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl; posting-host="h82-143-146-166-static.e-wro.net.pl:82.143.146.166";
logging-data="1937916"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@wsisiz.edu.pl"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <g7eo7h1pbc29akenj8aqnv1cfc3ojhonkv@4ax.com>
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220512-0, 5/12/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Received-Bytes: 1636
 by: Piotr Wyderski - Thu, 12 May 2022 05:47 UTC

John Larkin wrote:

> I have some 1T ohm 0805 resistors. High values are available.

I have 1G in 1206. I have quite a lot of 10M-33M in 0603 too, but they
make prototyping difficult. Wires help, hence this purchase of their THT
equivalents. Should arrive today, so no problem here.

Best regards, Piotr

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96735&group=sci.electronics.design#96735

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: eternal....@ademu.com (Arie de Muijnck)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 09:17:30 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
<t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 07:17:30 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="44d7d8eafdc5e83423bd94021405c8ab";
logging-data="15224"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX183VUdAiyYUyFNWPEaYtvJNahfERmN5i00="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.8.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aup7dWc3y+RMj3LQGM+b9nEGC/0=
In-Reply-To: <2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220512-0, 2022-5-12), Outbound message
 by: Arie de Muijnck - Thu, 12 May 2022 07:17 UTC

On 2022-05-12 00:30, John Larkin wrote:

> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
> second.

AFAIK, it's not the base current but base voltage that controls the collector current. The base current is just an unfortunate side effect. The relation between them happens to be rather constant, hence the idea that hfe is the main factor. Ideally, the base 'leakage' could be so low that base current electrons can be counted. In that case, would the much higher collector current come in packets?

Arie

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<t5ihgv$6pu$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96738&group=sci.electronics.design#96738

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!41edQ3YjPRN8eZ1dw7PDcA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: '''newsp...@nonad.co.uk (Martin Brown)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 09:46:21 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t5ihgv$6pu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
<t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="6974"; posting-host="41edQ3YjPRN8eZ1dw7PDcA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Martin Brown - Thu, 12 May 2022 08:46 UTC

On 11/05/2022 23:30, John Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2022 23:38:24 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
> <bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Phil Hobbs wrote:
>>
>>> Lots of small BJTs work fine in the low nanoamps.  I've used BFT25As as
>>> transdiodes down to 5 nA or so.  They crapped out about 1 nA.
>>
>> This is getting really interesting. I didn't know that BJTs have useful
>> subthreshold region too.
>
> I was theorizing that an LED, at low current, wouldn't have enough
> voltage across it to make visible photons. A typical green LED runs
> about 80 mV per decade current.
>
> I tried some green LEDs at 1 nA and they made visible light.

Certainly it a dark room you will see the die light up. I'd be surprised
if it did it with less voltage across the junction than energy of the
the photons being emitted (give or take a bit of slop for thermal phonon
interactions boosting the odd one).

These days at 5uA current drive you can see the white LED dies lit up
glowing a faint blue white under normal lab conditions.
>
> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
> second.

I suspect that there was a good reason why we used 10^11 ohm precision
resistors on Faraday amplifiers in mass specs but I never thought to
ask. They would sometimes put a 10^10 or 10^9 resistor on one channel
that was expected to have a higher beam current for some applications.

"Resistors" in that very high value regime don't behave at all ideally
either (maybe this has improved - I don't know). Considerable effort
went into correcting their non-ideal behaviour in post processing.

When the guy making them retired the first few batches with just his
apprentice at the helm unsupervised were unusable. There was an art to
cooking them just right to have the best combination of properties.

It isn't just the active components that behave oddly at ultra low
currents so does the pcb and the passive components. High value
resistors tend to behave like a distributed capacitance at >10^10.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<vq3q7h1bmjfnfmur7qtnbkmb5i9pnprj38@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96742&group=sci.electronics.design#96742

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 08:51:09 -0500
From: jlar...@highlandsniptechnology.com
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 06:51:07 -0700
Message-ID: <vq3q7h1bmjfnfmur7qtnbkmb5i9pnprj38@4ax.com>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net> <t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <g7eo7h1pbc29akenj8aqnv1cfc3ojhonkv@4ax.com> <t5i72d$1r4fs$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
X-Trace: sv3-t7GJZQT7uXqySOGD0wOsxzt8AwtVcZEYg+yGwdio1Espgq0h1PqBJADzszqF8+IV2Aq4dcpfnu4dPb9!cfjJZ6N8Dya2ypAmaZG8ooZQqgegPQIcs7fS1lHONShobOWpe6CMP2pfGE3dvsglR9U5j+3Aws+N!rLrcXQ==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2124
 by: jlar...@highlandsniptechnology.com - Thu, 12 May 2022 13:51 UTC

On Thu, 12 May 2022 07:47:39 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
<bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:

>John Larkin wrote:
>
>> I have some 1T ohm 0805 resistors. High values are available.
>
>I have 1G in 1206. I have quite a lot of 10M-33M in 0603 too, but they
>make prototyping difficult. Wires help, hence this purchase of their THT
>equivalents. Should arrive today, so no problem here.
>
> Best regards, Piotr
>

I did one photodiode amp that was all surface-mount but I couldn't
find suitable high-value thinfilm resistors, so I had to fly-over a
series pair of axial thinfilms.

The high value surfmounts are all thickfilm, at least the ones I could
get easily.

I don't like very low current design. Measurements take ages to
settle. Picosecond stuff happens right now.

Ditto thermal measurements. Tedious.

--

Anybody can count to one.

- Robert Widlar

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<t5j58l$58q$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96745&group=sci.electronics.design#96745

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pNaonStp...@yahoo.com (Jan Panteltje)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 14:23:14 GMT
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <t5j58l$58q$1@dont-email.me>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 14:23:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c6eb217cde92e1d2593b70653f8919bf";
logging-data="5402"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/banXUFnGskGHfMJCL72nQkq4/8010/No="
User-Agent: NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.4.79-v7l+)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JM+llF/cTHgfMpYvSWoW7LHgXI0=
X-Newsreader-location: NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (c) 'LIGHTSPEED' off line news reader for the Linux platform
NewsFleX homepage: http://www.panteltje.com/panteltje/newsflex/ and ftp download ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/linux/system/news/readers/
 by: Jan Panteltje - Thu, 12 May 2022 14:23 UTC

On a sunny day (Wed, 11 May 2022 12:17:51 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<0n2o7h9e69qdlfnd2j843un2b2ffldj3t4@4ax.com>:

>On Wed, 11 May 2022 20:39:08 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
><bombald@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am experimenting with ultra-low power ideas and I was able to simulate
>>a 30Hz relaxation oscillator running at 45nA/1V. I am waiting for the
>>delivery of high-value resistors, but the same oscillator with resistors
>>scaled down 10x works on the bench and consumes ~380nA/3V/360Hz which is
>>still pretty awesome.
>>
>>This real device has been made of BSS123/BSS84 operating in the
>>subthreshold realm -- the highest AC p-p voltage I can observe is
>>~500mV. There is a lot of interesting papers on subthreshold mode, so it
>>is all good.
>>
>>But, out of curiosity, I replaced the FETs with BC847C/BC857C and it
>>appears to work (in LTSpice!) even better, with V_BE sort of 350mV.
>>I admit, no prototype so far. I didn't expect this -- could you please
>>you recommend me some good book/papers on BJTs operated at nA levels?
>>I would like to learn the theory in a proper way, as inferring it from a
>>SPICE behavioural model might not be the best way to go. For example, it
>>looks like the beta is extremely high there, even exponential. Does this
>>BJT mode have a googlable name?
>>
>> Best regards, Piotr
>>
>>
>
>There is a niche of building oscillators that run at very low supply
>voltages, ballpark 10 mV. I think jfets do pretty good.

Have a JFET LC running from a thermocouple:
http://panteltje.com/pub/40_mV_oscillator_IMG_3597.GIF
http://panteltje.com/pub/40_mV_oscillator_waveform_on_gate_2Vpp_IMG_3598.GIF

Circuit diagram:
http://panteltje.com/pub/lighting_a_LED_with_a_candle_IMG_3604.GIF
But did not design for very low current.

Some PIC microprocessors take very little current
The 18LF1XK22 uses 34 nA in sleep mode, and 650 nA @32 kHz clock (says dataheet)
and can do a lot more than just oscillate...

>A depletion PHEMT might be good too.

Temperature range would be interesting.

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<b519aab8-7f43-d8c9-e822-d0cdbff757ab@electrooptical.net>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96746&group=sci.electronics.design#96746

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pcdhSpam...@electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 10:43:14 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <b519aab8-7f43-d8c9-e822-d0cdbff757ab@electrooptical.net>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
<t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com> <t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="366c696c9f9364916cb107cbacc3a943";
logging-data="14754"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18y8xg3X+6X6l2XWssh73Wc"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BuQIXwi5iwruW3whV1lnO2movqk=
In-Reply-To: <t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Phil Hobbs - Thu, 12 May 2022 14:43 UTC

Arie de Muijnck wrote:
> On 2022-05-12 00:30, John Larkin wrote:
>
>> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
>> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
>> second.
>
> AFAIK, it's not the base current but base voltage that controls the
> collector current. The base current is just an unfortunate side effect.
> The relation between them happens to be rather constant, hence the idea
> that hfe is the main factor. Ideally, the base 'leakage' could be so low
> that base current electrons can be counted. In that case, would the much
> higher collector current come in packets?
>
> Arie

Yup, a BJT is a transconductance device with a loss mechanism
(recombination in the base region) that produces leakage current. IIRC
Mikko Kiviranta or somebody said that the beta of a BFP650 goes up to
above 10000 at low temperature.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<20220512b@crcomp.net>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96748&group=sci.electronics.design#96748

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: g...@crcomp.net (Don)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <20220512b@crcomp.net>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net> <t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com> <t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b691b219e0cc45267b308411164f2aab";
logging-data="7376"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/pMSceZA0Zo9KPerIjGdLs"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HD/RunsMZufLiO4+YeOwDFhD94w=
 by: Don - Thu, 12 May 2022 15:35 UTC

Arie de Muijnck wrote:
> John Larkin wrote:
>
>> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
>> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
>> second.
>
> AFAIK, it's not the base current but base voltage that controls the
> collector current. The base current is just an unfortunate side effect.
> The relation between them happens to be rather constant, hence the idea
> that hfe is the main factor. Ideally, the base 'leakage' could be so low
> that base current electrons can be counted. In that case, would the much
> higher collector current come in packets?

Good point. You must be within the active region to use the hybrid model
to ignore transconductance.

Danke,

--
Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<e5348583-de4a-25fc-aa7c-b725afbe1511@electrooptical.net>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96751&group=sci.electronics.design#96751

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pcdhSpam...@electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 12:41:17 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <e5348583-de4a-25fc-aa7c-b725afbe1511@electrooptical.net>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
<t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com> <t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me>
<20220512b@crcomp.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="366c696c9f9364916cb107cbacc3a943";
logging-data="5045"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9kR/mHwRN+7LCRHWOUlBy"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lC/tAAmnQwU43Nny63MMfN9ezwg=
In-Reply-To: <20220512b@crcomp.net>
 by: Phil Hobbs - Thu, 12 May 2022 16:41 UTC

Don wrote:
> Arie de Muijnck wrote:
>> John Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
>>> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
>>> second.
>>
>> AFAIK, it's not the base current but base voltage that controls the
>> collector current. The base current is just an unfortunate side effect.
>> The relation between them happens to be rather constant, hence the idea
>> that hfe is the main factor. Ideally, the base 'leakage' could be so low
>> that base current electrons can be counted. In that case, would the much
>> higher collector current come in packets?
>
> Good point. You must be within the active region to use the hybrid model
> to ignore transconductance.
>
> Danke,
>

Don't ever ignore transconductance.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<7lfq7h15e72jdass4hct9pq5m8i2449742@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96753&group=sci.electronics.design#96753

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 12:12:52 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 10:12:52 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <7lfq7h15e72jdass4hct9pq5m8i2449742@4ax.com>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net> <t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com> <t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me> <b519aab8-7f43-d8c9-e822-d0cdbff757ab@electrooptical.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 86
X-Trace: sv3-vAMXQkBMQkOzIP3GVdW5cgkgp/YKRr9gIAAUl4oSCU6UEkwdQ7bQ6XeKlQi0vcbXJKkEAYGv4JFdRHt!V+DjaZtMBtQL/A3QEiMh3kyhLn4FxdvMJV/lhgez9eFBdGyA+7eHLd4g0PEROnBNovUS/k0wMGN/!jvtcmg==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3830
 by: John Larkin - Thu, 12 May 2022 17:12 UTC

On Thu, 12 May 2022 10:43:14 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

>Arie de Muijnck wrote:
>> On 2022-05-12 00:30, John Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
>>> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
>>> second.
>>
>> AFAIK, it's not the base current but base voltage that controls the
>> collector current. The base current is just an unfortunate side effect.
>> The relation between them happens to be rather constant, hence the idea
>> that hfe is the main factor. Ideally, the base 'leakage' could be so low
>> that base current electrons can be counted. In that case, would the much
>> higher collector current come in packets?
>>
>> Arie
>
>Yup, a BJT is a transconductance device with a loss mechanism
>(recombination in the base region) that produces leakage current. IIRC
>Mikko Kiviranta or somebody said that the beta of a BFP650 goes up to
>above 10000 at low temperature.
>
>Cheers
>
>Phil Hobbs

A transistor has c-b leakage, Is of the c-b diode, so turns itself on
with the base open. Spice at least suggests that any amount of added
base current increases collector current.

That said, I don't understand this:

Version 4
SHEET 1 880 680
WIRE 288 80 272 80
WIRE 304 80 288 80
WIRE 416 80 384 80
WIRE 272 128 272 80
WIRE 416 144 416 80
WIRE 176 176 144 176
WIRE 208 176 176 176
WIRE 144 208 144 176
WIRE 272 288 272 224
WIRE 416 288 416 224
WIRE 144 320 144 288
FLAG 272 288 0
FLAG 416 288 0
FLAG 144 320 0
FLAG 176 176 B
FLAG 288 80 C
SYMBOL npn 208 128 R0
WINDOW 0 83 28 Left 2
WINDOW 3 56 54 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName Q1
SYMATTR Value 2N5550
SYMBOL voltage 416 128 R0
WINDOW 0 49 37 Left 2
WINDOW 3 54 64 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName V1
SYMATTR Value 5
SYMBOL current 144 288 R180
WINDOW 0 54 35 Left 2
WINDOW 3 24 0 Left 2
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName I1
SYMATTR Value SINE(0 100f 1)
SYMBOL res 400 64 R90
WINDOW 0 -8 51 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R1
SYMATTR Value 1
TEXT 56 144 Left 2 !.tran 2
TEXT 528 184 Left 2 !.op abstol 1e-18
TEXT 528 216 Left 2 !.op gmin 1e-18
TEXT 0 56 Left 2 ;Low current NPN test
TEXT 32 88 Left 2 ;JL May 12 2022

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<20220512c@crcomp.net>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96754&group=sci.electronics.design#96754

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: g...@crcomp.net (Don)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 17:53:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <20220512c@crcomp.net>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net> <t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com> <t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me> <20220512b@crcomp.net> <e5348583-de4a-25fc-aa7c-b725afbe1511@electrooptical.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 17:53:53 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b691b219e0cc45267b308411164f2aab";
logging-data="5826"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19bL0HhRLCunhRjJhHrPwgN"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HCL/D24FDLLkDDrkem7qCmXCUBQ=
 by: Don - Thu, 12 May 2022 17:53 UTC

Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Don wrote:
>> Arie de Muijnck wrote:
>>> John Larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
>>>> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
>>>> second.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, it's not the base current but base voltage that controls the
>>> collector current. The base current is just an unfortunate side effect.
>>> The relation between them happens to be rather constant, hence the idea
>>> that hfe is the main factor. Ideally, the base 'leakage' could be so low
>>> that base current electrons can be counted. In that case, would the much
>>> higher collector current come in packets?
>>
>> Good point. You must be within the active region to use the hybrid model
>> to ignore transconductance.
>
> Don't ever ignore transconductance.

"Hybrid" (as used by me above) is arguably ambiguous. "Hybrid
equivalent" puts a finer point on it. And it indeed ignores
transconductance:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/BJT_h-parameters_(generalised).svg

Danke,

--
Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<f412c602-72c6-51ce-7e70-178928d0330f@electrooptical.net>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96755&group=sci.electronics.design#96755

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pcdhSpam...@electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 14:31:00 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <f412c602-72c6-51ce-7e70-178928d0330f@electrooptical.net>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
<t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com> <t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me>
<20220512b@crcomp.net>
<e5348583-de4a-25fc-aa7c-b725afbe1511@electrooptical.net>
<20220512c@crcomp.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="366c696c9f9364916cb107cbacc3a943";
logging-data="22814"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9f6oGekLh2sAMZujqtbeC"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2pf/ftzPqyJAZuZ1ZEpQTwOkfQk=
In-Reply-To: <20220512c@crcomp.net>
 by: Phil Hobbs - Thu, 12 May 2022 18:31 UTC

Don wrote:
> Phil Hobbs wrote:
>> Don wrote:
>>> Arie de Muijnck wrote:
>>>> John Larkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
>>>>> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
>>>>> second.
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK, it's not the base current but base voltage that controls the
>>>> collector current. The base current is just an unfortunate side effect.
>>>> The relation between them happens to be rather constant, hence the idea
>>>> that hfe is the main factor. Ideally, the base 'leakage' could be so low
>>>> that base current electrons can be counted. In that case, would the much
>>>> higher collector current come in packets?
>>>
>>> Good point. You must be within the active region to use the hybrid model
>>> to ignore transconductance.
>>
>> Don't ever ignore transconductance.
>
> "Hybrid" (as used by me above) is arguably ambiguous. "Hybrid
> equivalent" puts a finer point on it. And it indeed ignores
> transconductance:
>
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/BJT_h-parameters_(generalised).svg
>
> Danke,
>

Of course it does. That's why nobody ever uses it for anything real
AFAICT. The only reference I ever make to the h model is the current
gain, because it's easy to keep the distinction between small-signal
(h_FE) and large-signal (H_FE) straight.

One could use upper- and lowercase beta, but uppercase beta is
indistinguishable from B.

You can turn LEDs on and off ignoring g_M, or make a rule-of-thumb
single-ended CE amplifier with emitter degeneration. For anything
differential, you use g_M for the design and beta for the sanity check.

Beta is a useful number, mostly because it warns you about things you
can't do, but even in beta-graded parts it varies by a factor of 2,
whereas the transconductance of any two BJTs at the same collector
current and same temperature, of whatever size, of whatever make,
matches to a tiny fraction of 1%, at least at collector currents where
beta is vaguely reasonable.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<t5jlhk$1fg0$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96756&group=sci.electronics.design#96756

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Dx7IAdJ5xVnzdwRIt8aTIA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pcdhSpam...@electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 15:01:06 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t5jlhk$1fg0$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
<t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>
<2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com> <t5ica9$ero$1@dont-email.me>
<b519aab8-7f43-d8c9-e822-d0cdbff757ab@electrooptical.net>
<7lfq7h15e72jdass4hct9pq5m8i2449742@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="48640"; posting-host="Dx7IAdJ5xVnzdwRIt8aTIA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Phil Hobbs - Thu, 12 May 2022 19:01 UTC

John Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2022 10:43:14 -0400, Phil Hobbs
> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
>> Arie de Muijnck wrote:
>>> On 2022-05-12 00:30, John Larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
>>>> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
>>>> second.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, it's not the base current but base voltage that controls the
>>> collector current. The base current is just an unfortunate side effect.
>>> The relation between them happens to be rather constant, hence the idea
>>> that hfe is the main factor. Ideally, the base 'leakage' could be so low
>>> that base current electrons can be counted. In that case, would the much
>>> higher collector current come in packets?
>>>
>>> Arie
>>
>> Yup, a BJT is a transconductance device with a loss mechanism
>> (recombination in the base region) that produces leakage current. IIRC
>> Mikko Kiviranta or somebody said that the beta of a BFP650 goes up to
>> above 10000 at low temperature.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Phil Hobbs
>
> A transistor has c-b leakage, Is of the c-b diode, so turns itself on
> with the base open. Spice at least suggests that any amount of added
> base current increases collector current.
>
> That said, I don't understand this:
<snip>

I went into the control panel and set chgtol and absolute current
tolerance to 1E-18, and it works fine.

Hopefully JT is smiling indulgently somewhere. ;)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels

<6f2e61a9-0ee9-49d3-9c5d-7cebc4149013n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96758&group=sci.electronics.design#96758

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1195:b0:2f3:b8bf:46ab with SMTP id m21-20020a05622a119500b002f3b8bf46abmr1572873qtk.190.1652386695592;
Thu, 12 May 2022 13:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d646:0:b0:64a:8254:a70f with SMTP id
n67-20020a25d646000000b0064a8254a70fmr1507687ybg.578.1652386695349; Thu, 12
May 2022 13:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 13:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.221.140.126; posting-account=vKQm_QoAAADOaDCYsqOFDAW8NJ8sFHoE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.221.140.126
References: <t5gvsq$tatd$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2f703776-6d09-acb0-1e93-f8734fd2e87a@electrooptical.net>
<t5hacu$tq1i$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <2qdo7hha3hgfif8apt3vn0j3t2c8bgf723@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6f2e61a9-0ee9-49d3-9c5d-7cebc4149013n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: BJT behaviour at ridiculously low current levels
From: whit...@gmail.com (whit3rd)
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 20:18:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2046
 by: whit3rd - Thu, 12 May 2022 20:18 UTC

On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 3:30:14 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:

> I conjecture (ie guess) that base current makes collector current down
> at the single-electron level. 1 pA is just 6 milion electrons per
> second.

The other numbers are important. A single-electron level is noise
(recombination noise) in a semiconductor of any useful size.
Transistor base and emitter contacts for most packages are dozens of
microns, so discrete transistor volumes are on the order of 5E-5 cubic
centimeters. At 1.4 x 10E10 charge carriers per cc, for silicon, there's
mobile electrons and holes by the thousands in a transistor-size
piece of nonconducting (undoped) silicon. A doped transistor has... more.

It takes sizeable base charge to get above the noise.

Pages:123
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor