On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 5:23:28 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Saturday, April 9, 2022 at 2:22:52 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > Here, Bill pretends he read the filing.
>
> John Doe is lying as usual. The filing is remarkably long, and totally out of place here , so I just marked it as "spam" which it most certainly is.
>
> Nobody in their right mind would waste their time reading it. John Doe claims that it is set up for text-to-speech conversion, which would even more insane for anybody whose can reading faster than they they can take in speech (which is most people).
>
> I certainly haven't read it, and haven't made any claim to have read it.
>
> It does look as if the FBI set up the prosecution as a sop to Donald Trump, and are now trying to get the judge to kick it out, now that there's no need to keep Trump placated, but that merely based on a superficial impression of what's going on.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Hey SNIPPERMAN, the filing is far more relevant than the shit that you post.

On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 5:41:35 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 4:10:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 5:23:28 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Saturday, April 9, 2022 at 2:22:52 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > > > Here, Bill pretends he read the filing.
> > >
> > > John Doe is lying as usual. The filing is remarkably long, and totally out of place here , so I just marked it as "spam" which it most certainly is.
> > >
> > > Nobody in their right mind would waste their time reading it. John Doe claims that it is set up for text-to-speech conversion, which would even more insane for anybody whose can reading faster than they they can take in speech (which is most people).
> > >
> > > I certainly haven't read it, and haven't made any claim to have read it.
> > >
> > > It does look as if the FBI set up the prosecution as a sop to Donald Trump, and are now trying to get the judge to kick it out, now that there's no need to keep Trump placated, but that merely based on a superficial impression of what's going on.
> >
> > Hey SNIPPERMAN, the filing is far more relevant than the shit that you post.
>
> Flyguy's opinions are the demented rambling of an opinionated twit in the last stages of senile dementia. They aren't relevant to anything at all, but he's much too far gone to realise this.
> My posts are at least short. John Doe's go on for pages, and the FBI prosecution hasn't got anything to do with electronics design, which does make them spectacularly irrelevant here.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

No SNIPPERMAN, your pedantic ramblings are BORING and REPETITIVE, as well as being uninformative and outright lies.

Sticking its nose into America's problems gets this Australian troll's panties wet.

Bozo Bill Sloman, the most frequent troll in this group, is an attention-craving chronic liar who cannot be reasoned with...

"the user has posted under the same name in other places, so not
nym-shifting" (Bozo sucks at logic)

"the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so"
(Bozo being Bozo)

"the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions"
(Bozo is a textbook cannibal leftist)

On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 11:00:17 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 2:34:41 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 5:41:35 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 4:10:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 5:23:28 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > On Saturday, April 9, 2022 at 2:22:52 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > > > > > Here, Bill pretends he read the filing.
> > > > >
> > > > > John Doe is lying as usual. The filing is remarkably long, and totally out of place here , so I just marked it as "spam" which it most certainly is.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nobody in their right mind would waste their time reading it. John Doe claims that it is set up for text-to-speech conversion, which would even more insane for anybody whose can reading faster than they they can take in speech (which is most people).
> > > > >
> > > > > I certainly haven't read it, and haven't made any claim to have read it.
> > > > >
> > > > > It does look as if the FBI set up the prosecution as a sop to Donald Trump, and are now trying to get the judge to kick it out, now that there's no need to keep Trump placated, but that merely based on a superficial impression of what's going on.
> > > >
> > > > Hey SNIPPERMAN, the filing is far more relevant than the shit that you post.
> > >
> > > Flyguy's opinions are the demented rambling of an opinionated twit in the last stages of senile dementia. They aren't relevant to anything at all, but he's much too far gone to realise this.
> >
> > > My posts are at least short. John Doe's go on for pages, and the FBI prosecution hasn't got anything to do with electronics design, which does make them spectacularly irrelevant here.
> >
> >
> > No Sloman, your pedantic ramblings are BORING and REPETITIVE, as well as being uninformative and outright lies.
>
> By which Flyguy means that he can't understand any of them, so they all look the same to him. He'd like to think that they were outright lies, but he has yet to pick up any individual statement and tell why thinks that it is wrong. The nonsense he does post does suggest that if he did, his arguments wouldn't be persuasive.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Hey SNIPPERMAN, here are your OWN WORDS:

"I certainly haven't read it, and haven't made any claim to have read it."

I understand completely that this is the mind of a blowhard that does much more talking than listening, if any.

On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 1:40:26 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 5:29:56 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > Sticking its nose into America's problems gets this Australian excited.
>
> John Doe can't be bothered to mention which of America's problems he imagines I find exciting.
>
> The John Durham prosecution - which he seems to think is worth paying attention to - isn't any kind of problem, except perhaps for the
> FBI who seem to have taken it on as sop to Trump, and haven't yet found a tidy way of giving up on it now that Trump isn't in a position where he is worth pacifying.
>
> It's a fairly comical subject, and John Doe's deluded enthusiasm for taking it seriously is even funnier. I do like making jokes at John Doe's expense - since he's here we do have do something useful with him - but it's not something to get excited about.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydne

Hey SNIPPERMAN, tell me that a felony trial for Shrillary's lawyer isn't "worth paying attention to." While you're at it tell us that Hunter BooBoo's laptop is Russian disinformation.

FWIW...

You might notice lots of news stories, even some from the cannibal left,
about the upcoming trial since it starts soon (maybe next week).

Lots of recent stories, using this on Google...

allintext:Durham Sussmann

Limit results to a few days or so.

Losing the entire context, John Doe comes up with:
> FWIW...
>
> You might notice lots of news stories, even some from the cannibal
> left, about the upcoming trial since it starts soon (maybe next
> week).
>
> Lots of recent stories, using this on Google...
>
> allintext:Durham Sussmann
>
> Limit results to a few days or so.

I walked out of Costco, headed back to my car, and found $20 in the
parking lot.

On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 10:54:07 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 2:55:34 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 1:40:26 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 5:29:56 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > > > Sticking its nose into America's problems gets this Australian excited.
> > >
> > > John Doe can't be bothered to mention which of America's problems he imagines I find exciting.
> > >
> > > The John Durham prosecution - which he seems to think is worth paying attention to - isn't any kind of problem, except perhaps for the
> > > FBI who seem to have taken it on as sop to Trump, and haven't yet found a tidy way of giving up on it now that Trump isn't in a position where he is worth pacifying.
> > >
> > > It's a fairly comical subject, and John Doe's deluded enthusiasm for taking it seriously is even funnier. I do like making jokes at John Doe's expense - since he's here we do have do something useful with him - but it's not something to get excited about.
> >
> > Hey Sloman, tell me that a felony trial for Shrillary's lawyer isn't "worth paying attention to."
>
> It might be worth paying attention to if it lead to a prosecution. Sussmann isn't - strictly speaking one of Hillary Clintons's lawyers. He did work for the Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign, which isn't quite the same thing.

LOL! That is EXACTLY why they are prosecuting Sussman, SNIPPERMAN! He even BILLED Shrillary for his time spent on lying to the Feds, which is part of their evidence. Prosecutors generally don't indict people that they think they can't get a conviction on.

>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Sussmann
>
> His claim is that what he'd found out when he had been retained by them was worrying enough that he felt - as a private person - that he ought to draw it to the attention of the FBI . Who was paying him when he found it out shouldn't be material.
> >While you're at it tell us that Hunter BooBoo's laptop is Russian disinformation.
> More likely Trump-generated misinformation. The laptop was produced by the Trump campaign team after they'd had every opportunity to salt it with all the fake evidence they might feel like planting on the device. As a smoking gun, it smells more like a stinking fake.

SNIPPERMAN. this is ANOTHER one of your BLATANT LIES. Even the NY Times AND The WaPo have admitted that Hunter BooBoo's laptop is genuine, and it contains a wealth of evidence against both Hunter BooBoo and Lyin' Biden.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 4:25:59 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 2:55:03 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 10:54:07 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 2:55:34 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 1:40:26 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 5:29:56 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> <snip>
> > > >While you're at it tell us that Hunter BooBoo's laptop is Russian disinformation.
> >
> > > More likely Trump-generated misinformation. The laptop was produced by the Trump campaign pteam after they'd had every opportunity to salt it with all the fake evidence they might feel like planting on the device. As a smoking gun, it smells more like a stinking fake.
> >
> > SNIPPERMAN this is ANOTHER one of your BLATANT LIES. Even the NY Times AND The WaPo have admitted that Hunter BooBoo's laptop is genuine, and it contains a wealth of evidence against both Hunter BooBoo and Lyin' Biden.
> > https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/
>
> The laptop presumably belonged to Hunter Biden at some point. The says nothing about when the "wealth of evidence" got written on it, and anybody with more brains than Flyguy would be able to work out that the Trump campaign team would have been delighted to add any "evidence" they liked before they showed it off to the public.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Oh, now the laptop is REAL - apparently SNIPPERMAN had an epiphany. No, there is no incriminating evidence on it, like Papa Joe's involvement in illegal influence peddling involving both Ukranians and Chinese.