AP's 184th book of science// Earth's Kings of Science

Sorry, my last 10 books of science took the steam out of me, so to speak, especially the 183rd where I was struggling. Months of struggling with one logjam after another logjam. So I decided to do some light hearted science, not that intense pure physics. So the next two books of mine, or more, are rest and relaxation for me in science writing, to regain the energy to then do a pure physics book.

This book of "Earth's Kings of Science" was brewed up, upon watching Ben Franklin on PBS, a 4 hour long movie, broken into 2 episodes, of detailed facts of a documentary in April of 2022. This movie is the inspiration of this book.

Earth's Kings of Science
5m views

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Apr 6, 2022, 4:37:48 PM (10 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

Archimedes 1st, Ancient Greeks, the First King of Science, and although he lost the war with Rome, he won the world of Intellect and Power of Mind, of Education and of Science. If we contrast this King of Science with Ben Franklin some 2,000 years later, Ben won the war against the British and Ben's job was to make political science be an actual science itself-- checks and balances so that petty dictators do not screw up Earth and screw up humanity along with it-- Putin and Xi.

AP, 7th King of Science, whose job it is to get Humanity to colonize Europa, and prevent a nuclear war from crazies of the likes of Putin and Xi

Archimedes Plutonium

Newton, the 2nd King of Science, although he had no time for politics, he had his hands full with making Science be a Systematic Study-- Physics be a integral system.

AP, King of Science

Ben Franklin, 3rd King of Science, ushered in by electricity as the central role of science of the future, setting the stage for political science, has itself to be scientific, starting the removal of Tyrants, and Petty Dictators. Setting the stage of making political power be ultimately have governance from science intelligence. Checks and Balances to keep political decisions from going down ruinous pathways-- avoiding dictators with their oaflike minds-- Putin, Xi.

AP

Faraday, the 4th King of Science; Maxwell the 5th King of Science, setting the stage for a electricity-planet Earth for humanity.

AP, King of Science

A duo pair of scientists Edison & Tesla-- 6th Kings of Science --- electrified planet Earth-- setting the stage for the 7th King of Science-- Archimedes Plutonium

AP

Archimedes Plutonium, the 7th King of Science, present and alive. And I see my job and task ahead of me. I have no choice but to engage. The Sun has gone Red Giant Phase. Although most humans think of it and call it erroneously as Global Warming due to fossil fuel burning, it is far far larger than just burning fossil fuel. It is that our Sun like all stars shine from Faraday law of electricity and magnetism, not from fusion which all dumb-minded physicists think stars shine from fusion.

So, well, this means we have about 1,000 year window to move from Earth out to Europa, to escape the deathing Solar rays which at the moment are increasing at 0.005% yearly. This increase killed 25% of all insects in the past ten years of 2010 to 2020. As that Solar Radiation goes from 0.005% yearly to 0.006% yearly increase may mean 25% of all land animals and plants die off. At some point in time, few plants can exist with the increasing radiation, which I suspect is 1,000 years from now. Essentially the deathbed of Earth's life.

We see it in evidence in geology,-- the accelerated arctic and antarctic meltdowns is not from fossil fuel burning alone, not from that alone, but the main culprit is our Sun itself and mostly from Solar Radiation increase. We see it in Droughts, where in the future all continent interiors will be dry as a bone and mostly all rainfall on the seaboards of continents.

So, my job is to teach the truth of physics, and to teach that we have to colonize Europa, or else all of life on Earth goes Extinct and goes into Oblivion. As part of that job, I have to steer the political idiots of Planet Earth such as Putin and Xi, steer those political idiots from preventing humanity from colonizing Europa. Steer those insane oafs who want to be a Alexander the Great from ruining humanities chances with their play toys of nuclear missiles.

Archimedes of Ancient Greeks lost to the Romans, Archimedes the Second of here and now, let us hope he wins against the likes of stupid idiot oafs Putin and Xi.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Apr 7, 2022, 10:15:29 AM (9 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
2-Edison & Tesla-- 6th Kings of Science --- electrified planet Earth-- setting the stage for the 7th King of Science-- Archimedes Plutonium

One of the greatest mistakes of the Nobel Prize Committee is -- nonrecognition ---

The world is today what it is-- chiefly from the work produced by Edison and by Tesla-- yet the chattering idiots of the Nobel science, those chattering idiots were so unfit to see what was going on in science that they utterly overlooked what was the greatest science from 1900 to 1990-- the electrification of planet Earth.

Probably because the scientists of 1900-1990 were mostly minds on cloud 99 and not anywhere down on Earth with engineering. They had a disdain for engineering and thought only such nonsense as Uncertainty Principle, stars shine from fusion when in truth they shine from Faraday law, and not even able to see real electron of atoms is the muon, not their mindless 0.5MeV particle. So Nobel Prize overlooks two of the most hard working scienctists that ever lived Edison-Tesla, overlook them completely and end up giving the Nobel prizes to worthless physicists of this list

Stupid Nobel Physics prizes to those who cannot even ask the question of which is the atom's real true electron, the muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.

This list below are not physicists but con-artists who did more to set back physics than to ever give the science of physics-- truth and knowledge. So the Nobel prizes miss two giants== Edison and Tesla, and award con-artists of physics with their mindless nonsense of science fakery.

Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
Arthur B. McDonald
Francois Englert
Saul Perlmutter
Brian P. Schmidt
Adam G. Riess
Makoto Kobayashi
Toshihide Maskawa
Yoichiro Nambu
John C. Mather
George F. Smoot
Roy J. Glauber
David J. Gross
Hugh David Politzer
Frank Wilczek
Raymond Davis Jr.
Masatoshi Koshiba
Riccardo Giacconi
Gerardus 't Hooft
Martinus J.G. Veltman
Jerome I. Friedman
Henry W. Kendall
Richard E. Taylor
Carlo Rubbia
Simon van der Meer
William Alfred Fowler
Kenneth G. Wilson
James Watson Cronin
Val Logsdon Fitch
Sheldon Lee Glashow
Steven Weinberg
..
..
little fishes
..
..
Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV

Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
more and more layers of error thinking physics
..
..
John Baez
Brian Greene
Lisa Randall
Alan H. Guth
Michael E. Brown
Konstantin Batygin
Ben Bullock
Larry Harson
Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
None at all - he was a raving nutter.
Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
Edward Witten

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Apr 9, 2022, 2:24:42 AM (7 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The 7th King of Science is not keeping up with the USA CIA and UK Mi6. Please forgive me.

--- quoting BBC ---
The release included the UK sharing details of Russian plans to install specific individuals as part of a puppet government in Kyiv - and Washington revealing plans by Moscow to stage pretexts for war, so-called false flags, involving dead bodies whom they would falsely claim had been killed by Ukrainians.
American and British spies both believe that publicising this material robbed Moscow of the ability to justify the invasion to its own people and other countries as a defensive move.
One spy says of those days before the invasion that he had never seen anything like it - highly classified material would be on his desk one day and then emerge in the public domain the next.
But the unprecedented outpouring of intelligence was not enough to stop the invasion.
The public release had not deterred Moscow. That may never have been possible but officials believe it did disrupt Russia's plans. And it meant the reaction across the West was swifter and more unified than it might otherwise have been, they argue.
--- end quoting BBC ---

Sorry to CIA here in America and Boris Johnson's Mi6, I have been far too busy to post my publishing of book 182nd on Mathematical Induction. I do not want any false flags.

Archimedes Plutonium
12:05 AM (6 minutes ago)



to
Ben Franklin PBS series// Science Council Rules Earth Watching "Ben Franklin: Join or Die (1706-1774)" on PBS tonight 3m views to sci.physics Watching "Ben Franklin: Join or Die (1706-1774)" on PBS tonight


Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>

Apr 5, 2022, 9:14:30 PM (11 days ago)






to Plutonium Atom Universe
Ben Franklin PBS series// Science Council Rules Earth

Watching "Ben Franklin: Join or Die (1706-1774)" on PBS tonight
3m views

to sci.physics
Watching "Ben Franklin: Join or Die (1706-1774)" on PBS tonight

Alright I missed the 7PM to 9PM show. And watched it on the 1AM to 3AM show..

Learned a few things new on Franklin's science.

I admire his work and theories in science.

Had no idea that the word "battery" comes from armaments of battery. I did know the word "charge" comes from horses charging.

But the one thing I did learn which relates to my own character. Is that when my mother died, she was in the USA, and I was in Australia teaching math under contract in 1974-76. Both my mother and father died while I was in Australia. I think most everyone in the world would have flown home. Not me.

And now that I see Franklin did not go home for his wife's death, in some sense harkens gladness, and relief. That scientists use their rational minds more than sensibility minds. I am not saying it is an excuse. Just saying, science is best served cold.

AP

to sci.physics
Benjamin Franklin: An American (1775-1790)

Captivating, utterly spellbound for me. One of the greatest movie or tv shows I have every watched.

I should include this in my books of Science Council Rules Earth.

For the success of America as a country, is mostly the acknowledgment that the Founding Fathers of America, were for the most part-- Scientists.

There was Franklin going home to Philadelphia after diplomacy in France to when the war. Going home and still measuring the Gulf Stream current.

Throughout this beautiful show on Franklin, I can see the hands of God, Guiding-- America-- in its warm hands of Superdeterminism. And in the end, Franklin devoted to freeing slavery and making life better for Native Americans.

Thank you Ben Franklin, rest in peace.

Atom

I needed some light-hearted physics as a rest up from the torrid pure physics of my last 10 books, and Kings of Science is just what the doctored ordered up.

This book of history of Kings of Science all originated in early April 2022 with PBS, Ken Burns documentary of Benjamin Franklin "explores the revolutionary life of one of the 18th Century's most consequential figures, whose work and words unlocked the mystery of electricity and helped create the United States."

Not the first time I have written the words "King of Science" for over the past decade, I often end my post to Usenet with the signature block "AP, King of Science, especially Physics-Chemistry".

Well now, let me see where approximately I started do that thing-- my signature block as "King of Science"?

Having a search through my own personal archive. Apparently by 2019 becomes the starting date for my habit of a signature block of AP, King of Science.. Probably because of my 2016-17 discovery that the real true electron of atoms was the muon and not the 0.5MeV particle, then the discovery that since the muon is the true electron means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion but from Faraday law, that my psyche had wanted to replace the signature block to read AP-- King of Science. For my 2nd great discovery of physics-- as muon is true electron of atoms, put me way above all other physicists. For not only had I discovered a totally new physics-- of Atom Totality, but discovered where Old Physics made a fatal mistake in their atomic structure. By my 2016-17 discovery of true electron is muon had overturned every hard science, and every science had to change to correct its mistake. I was a bit humble, I would say, for it took me until 2019 to start having my signature block read AP, King of Science. But this signature block did not come out of the blue yonder. For ever since the 1990s, I had recognized that Physics was the King of the Sciences and often mentioned that idea in posts. But then in 2019, I shifted that idea of Physics being the King of Sciences, shifted that idea to myself-- a person as a King of Science. A King that was blessed by the Gods to be a King, and to have a pipeline to the godhead to be the King of Science. For this is how the Ancient Greeks and Romans viewed genius-- as a direct pipeline to the Godhead.

Here is a post with the example of Physics as the king of science, not mathematics.

Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-universe@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Comments on the 2 volumes Teaching True Mathematics: making math
the easiest of the 5 hard sciences

Comments on the 2 volumes Teaching True Mathematics: making math the easiest of the 5 hard sciences

Yes, once I finish this two volume set, students across the world will find that mathematics is the easiest of these hard sciences:

1) Physics

2) Chemistry

3) Biology

4) Engineering

5) Mathematics

I include engineering as a experimental science.

But the reason for my boasting claim, is that calculus was simplified by my geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, getting rid of the b.s. Limit, and then by my conversion of all functions to be a polynomial function. Of course, getting rid of 90% of Old Math trigonometry helped immensely. And the second stage of making math easy is getting rid of all the hardships surrounding AP-Maxwell Equations by noting, those equations are just simple Plug-In of numbers gathered from experiment. And, no other equation in physics is higher than AP- Maxwell Equations.

Yes, my program of mathematics, makes math much easier as a science than is the science biology. Biology now is more difficult a study than is mathematics. Of course, the hardest science is physics, because it is the king of sciences. For all science is reduced to electricity and magnetism. Every thing that goes on, and everything that exists is atoms with electricity and magnetism. And mathematics was simply a tool to describe atoms and electricity and magnetism.

Before my 2 volume textbooks Teaching True Mathematics, the science of mathematics had become so filled with obnoxious fakery, mountains upon mountains and layers upon layers of b.s. fakery, that it was driving away many to most young students, driving them to biology or other science, not math. And sadly, it never needed to be like that. 

So my two volume set, will free, will liberate students who love science, but who cannot stomach math because it was rotten to the core in fakery.

AP

Here is another post where I write that Physics is the king of sciences.

Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 23:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: AP finds a new error in Old Logic-- their concept of Union needs
drastic overhaul //COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:48:40 +0000

AP finds a new error in Old Logic-- their concept of Union needs drastic overhaul //COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE

I seem to have discovered a new concept of LOGIC, for I do not recognize anything in Logic that bespeaks of the idea that a concept of mathematics is not a cobbling process. The union of disparate parts to form a concept. I am talking of the fact that Reals are a union of disparate sets, that never belonged together. The fact that functions in Old Math were a cobbling together of any "so called function" as being a well defined concept. All functions have to be one class-- polynomials, for only the polynomials guarantee every function is differentiable and every function is integrable.

So, I am looking to see if LOGIC ever had discussions and thoughts on the process of "cobbling". Forming Unions of disparate parts. Parts that do not fit together, but which have been assembled, yet they do not work. The Reals and the Functions of Old Math were two cobbled together concepts that amount to fakery.

I suppose I must focus and concentrate on the topic of UNION in Logic. The idea of union seems as though, you can union anything in Old Logic. And here maybe the cause of error. We assume you can take disparate parts and join them into a Union. A poor poor assumption. Like saying we have atoms of neon, helium, oxygen and can union them into a working new structure of HeNeO.. You can union H with O, but not He with O.

And the reverse logic, you can always disociate or render apart a union into smaller parts. So that a reduction of a union is possible and makes common sense, but the other way around, taking parts and assembling into a Union is a error filled assumption.

Union can be cobbling, a cobbling that never exists.

I studied a lot of Logic especially fallacies. I never came across a Fallacy of Union. Another example is union of like poles of a magnet-- the Pauli Exclusion Principle. So the Pauli Exclusion Principle is a physics idea that forbids some Unions. Since Physics is the king of science, means, Old Logic has a hole in the head over the concept of Union.

Well, I am happy and proud to find a new correction to Old Logic. They need a overhaul of their concept of Union.

AP

And here starts a post where I refer to myself, a person as the King of Science. Perhaps by September of 2019, I had started to realize the huge discovery of the mistaken identity of the atom's true electron and all the fallout that such a error would fix-- the Sun shines from Faraday law.

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Hooray, one of my alma maters made it on the list of 100 Greenest
colleges-- UC at #78
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 18:26:23 +0000

Hooray, one of my alma maters made it on the list of 100 Greenest colleges-- UC at #78

Congratulations University of Cincinnati listed in Sierra Clubs Sept Oct magazine 2019 as 78th Greenest colleges. I would think that would be a hard and daunting task for UC since it is such a urban campus, but I do remember a green parkway along one side of UC.

I did not see Utah State on that list, my other alma mater.

Thompson Rivers University in Canada made #1 with Univ California Irvine making #2.

I was expecting Dartmouth College to make the list of 100, but did not see them mentioned. And ironic that I went to Dartmouth in 1989 because of its "green surroundings" as opposed to any other Ivy league school. I do see Cornell as #29. If I had gone to Cornell in 1989, would the life of AP be altogether different? No Atom Totality, no king of science? Or, maybe a even greater story of science for AP if I landed at Cornell in 1989.

As for the closest nearby Green School to my home is Iowa State University #94. Good job Iowa State!!! Maybe you can convince University of Iowa to go Green.

Here is the first post in my records where the signature block is itself AP, -- King of Science.

On Sunday, December 8, 2019 at 12:55:06 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in plutonium-atom-universe:
Is there a logical distinction that can be made between "for always" and that of "forever" ?? Re: Chess, once and forever more

A strange Logical Point of View arose a few minutes ago as I published this Chess book.

I wrote the Title as Chess Optimal Strategy OS: once for always and forever

Then I wrote it as Chess Optimal Strategy OS: once and for always

So, here is the problem. Does once and for always include once and for always and forever?

Is there a logical difference in for always and that of forever?

I think there is, in the idea of biology species. Say for instance the Dodo bird now extinct. Say we had some DNA remaining. So the Dodo bird DNA was "once" and will be the DNA "for always", but while the Dodo bird is extinct it is not forever. So that as the genetic engineers in the future take that Dodo bird DNA and resurrect the bird back to life in the distant future, we can say "once and for always and forever".