Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"Buy land. They've stopped making it." -- Mark Twain


tech / sci.math / Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

SubjectAuthor
* My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workDan Christensen
+* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workFritz Feldhase
|`* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
| `- Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
+- Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMathin3D
+* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workDan Christensen
|`* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workKye Egonidis
| `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workDan Christensen
|  `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workKye Egonidis
|   +* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
|   |+* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
|   ||`* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workKye Egonidis
|   || `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workDan Christensen
|   ||  `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workKye Egonidis
|   ||   `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workDan Christensen
|   ||    +* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workKye Egonidis
|   ||    |`* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
|   ||    | `- Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
|   ||    `- Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMichael Moroney
|   |`* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workKye Egonidis
|   | +* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workFromTheRafters
|   | |`- Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workKye Egonidis
|   | `- Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
|   `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workDan Christensen
|    `- Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workKye Egonidis
`* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
 +* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
 |`* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
 | `- Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
 `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workAnton Moto
  `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
   `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
    `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workAnton Moto
     `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
      `* Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse
       `- Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not workMostowski Collapse

Pages:12
My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97694&group=sci.math#97694

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:c250:0:b0:444:4193:7eb1 with SMTP id w16-20020a0cc250000000b0044441937eb1mr1542903qvh.40.1650578642783;
Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4802:0:b0:2f4:e38a:daa3 with SMTP id
v2-20020a814802000000b002f4e38adaa3mr1817008ywa.431.1650578642669; Thu, 21
Apr 2022 15:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=163.182.226.42; posting-account=OWfgwwgAAADQpH2XgMDMe2wuQ7OFPXlE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.182.226.42
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: Dan_Chri...@sympatico.ca (Dan Christensen)
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 22:04:02 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 3
 by: Dan Christensen - Thu, 21 Apr 2022 22:04 UTC

My Axiom of Functional Equality, as it stands, does not work. Thanks all for your persistence on this issue. I will either replace or withdraw it altogether within the next few days.

Regards,
Dan

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<a49778e9-7dce-4d0c-9a55-28444a810d33n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97696&group=sci.math#97696

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5bcd:0:b0:2e1:c6c4:ca00 with SMTP id b13-20020ac85bcd000000b002e1c6c4ca00mr1267639qtb.528.1650581300555;
Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:83cf:0:b0:2ec:5d4:58be with SMTP id
t198-20020a8183cf000000b002ec05d458bemr2046938ywf.509.1650581300317; Thu, 21
Apr 2022 15:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=79.206.201.6; posting-account=-75WZwoAAABL0f0-07Kn6tvNHWg7W9AE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 79.206.201.6
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a49778e9-7dce-4d0c-9a55-28444a810d33n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: franz.fr...@gmail.com (Fritz Feldhase)
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 22:48:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 8
 by: Fritz Feldhase - Thu, 21 Apr 2022 22:48 UTC

On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 12:04:10 AM UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote:

> My Axiom of Functional Equality, as it stands, does not work. Thanks all for your persistence on this issue. I will either replace or withdraw it altogether within the next few days.

Why not discuss this topic sine ira et studio, Dan?

Imho you should try to do that too. I'd say non of us is an idiot. Especially Ben and Jan DO know what they are talking about. It might not hurt at least to assume that they might say something meaningful sometimes.

The function topic is interesting imho. We all might learn something here.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<bde495f9-77ca-4f1d-929b-dff6d235e4a5n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97699&group=sci.math#97699

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a37:de0c:0:b0:69e:cd37:7646 with SMTP id h12-20020a37de0c000000b0069ecd377646mr1178367qkj.449.1650584412579;
Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:89:b0:2d7:fb7d:db7 with SMTP id
be9-20020a05690c008900b002d7fb7d0db7mr2477767ywb.219.1650584412410; Thu, 21
Apr 2022 16:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a49778e9-7dce-4d0c-9a55-28444a810d33n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com> <a49778e9-7dce-4d0c-9a55-28444a810d33n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bde495f9-77ca-4f1d-929b-dff6d235e4a5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:40:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 14
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:40 UTC

I was expecting: My Axiom of Functional Equality, as it stands,
does not work. --> Hee Hee! <--- (the Famous Dan Christens exclamation)

Because you got an Aha Moment... (At least I guess so...)

Fritz Feldhase schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 00:48:26 UTC+2:
> On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 12:04:10 AM UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> > My Axiom of Functional Equality, as it stands, does not work. Thanks all for your persistence on this issue. I will either replace or withdraw it altogether within the next few days.
> Why not discuss this topic sine ira et studio, Dan?
>
> Imho you should try to do that too. I'd say non of us is an idiot. Especially Ben and Jan DO know what they are talking about. It might not hurt at least to assume that they might say something meaningful sometimes.
>
> The function topic is interesting imho. We all might learn something here.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<98e79bd3-2a13-4f7e-b781-31a30901c445n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97700&group=sci.math#97700

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7f95:0:b0:2f3:479d:1c1d with SMTP id z21-20020ac87f95000000b002f3479d1c1dmr1394206qtj.345.1650584521989;
Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:a4c:0:b0:628:b143:5bd with SMTP id z12-20020a5b0a4c000000b00628b14305bdmr2210931ybq.212.1650584521514;
Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <bde495f9-77ca-4f1d-929b-dff6d235e4a5n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<a49778e9-7dce-4d0c-9a55-28444a810d33n@googlegroups.com> <bde495f9-77ca-4f1d-929b-dff6d235e4a5n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <98e79bd3-2a13-4f7e-b781-31a30901c445n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:42:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 17
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:42 UTC

30 hits with Hee Hee:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/search?q=Hee%20Hee

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 01:40:17 UTC+2:
> I was expecting: My Axiom of Functional Equality, as it stands,
> does not work. --> Hee Hee! <--- (the Famous Dan Christens exclamation)
>
> Because you got an Aha Moment... (At least I guess so...)
> Fritz Feldhase schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 00:48:26 UTC+2:
> > On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 12:04:10 AM UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >
> > > My Axiom of Functional Equality, as it stands, does not work. Thanks all for your persistence on this issue. I will either replace or withdraw it altogether within the next few days.
> > Why not discuss this topic sine ira et studio, Dan?
> >
> > Imho you should try to do that too. I'd say non of us is an idiot. Especially Ben and Jan DO know what they are talking about. It might not hurt at least to assume that they might say something meaningful sometimes.
> >
> > The function topic is interesting imho. We all might learn something here.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<2edb7271-2ce7-462a-9879-cd43aa5f5ae8n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97702&group=sci.math#97702

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:15d1:b0:2f3:4dad:9f4 with SMTP id d17-20020a05622a15d100b002f34dad09f4mr1635156qty.287.1650592091057;
Thu, 21 Apr 2022 18:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1549:b0:642:b223:a253 with SMTP id
r9-20020a056902154900b00642b223a253mr2470818ybu.485.1650592090879; Thu, 21
Apr 2022 18:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 18:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=204.27.217.15; posting-account=NPSZfwoAAADnLo0bjR29AqwlFTeNuI_c
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.27.217.15
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2edb7271-2ce7-462a-9879-cd43aa5f5ae8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: mathi...@gmail.com (Mathin3D)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 01:48:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 6
 by: Mathin3D - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 01:48 UTC

Imagine if one day John Gabriel were to admit his "New Calculus" is a heap of sh t. That would be the day. :)

On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 6:04:10 PM UTC-4, Dan Christensen wrote:
> My Axiom of Functional Equality, as it stands, does not work. Thanks all for your persistence on this issue. I will either replace or withdraw it altogether within the next few days.
>
> Regards,
> Dan

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97731&group=sci.math#97731

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1767:b0:456:f39:4cbb with SMTP id et7-20020a056214176700b004560f394cbbmr293320qvb.37.1650650591818;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:8c10:0:b0:61d:b17e:703d with SMTP id
k16-20020a258c10000000b0061db17e703dmr5809370ybl.154.1650650591528; Fri, 22
Apr 2022 11:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=163.182.226.42; posting-account=OWfgwwgAAADQpH2XgMDMe2wuQ7OFPXlE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.182.226.42
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: Dan_Chri...@sympatico.ca (Dan Christensen)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:03:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 27
 by: Dan Christensen - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:03 UTC

On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 6:04:10 PM UTC-4, Dan Christensen wrote:
> My Axiom of Functional Equality, as it stands, does not work. Thanks all for your persistence on this issue. I will either replace or withdraw it altogether within the next few days.
>

Some background from Wikipedia:

"In the relational approach, a function f: X→Y is a binary relation between X and Y that associates to each element of X exactly one element of Y. That is, f is defined by a set G of ordered pairs (x, y) with x ∈ X, y ∈ Y, such that every element of X is the first component of exactly one ordered pair in G. ... The set G is called the graph of f. Some authors identify it with the function; however, in common usage, THE FUNCTION IS GENERALLY DISTINGUISHED FROM ITS GRAPH." (My emphasis)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_(mathematics)#Relational_approach

It now seems to me that it may only to be possible to effectively formalize the notion of the equality of functional operators (e.g. f(x)) by identifying functions with their graphs. In keeping with common usage (as above), I will withdraw my Axiom of Functional Equality. We can still, however, make use of the equivalence: ALL(a):[a in dom => f(a)=g(a)].

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97732&group=sci.math#97732

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: qli...@xuelxjxk.io (Kye Egonidis)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:11:33 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="65024"; posting-host="mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Kye Egonidis - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:11 UTC

Dan Christensen wrote:

> "In the relational approach, a function f: X→Y is a binary relation
> between X and Y that associates to each element of X exactly one element
> of Y. That is, f is defined by a set G of ordered pairs (x, y) with x ∈
> X,
> y ∈ Y, such that every element of X is the first component of exactly
> one ordered pair in G. ... The set G is called the graph of f. Some
> authors identify it with the function; however, in common usage, THE
> FUNCTION IS GENERALLY DISTINGUISHED FROM ITS GRAPH." (My emphasis)
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_(mathematics)#Relational_approach
>
> It now seems to me that it may only to be possible to effectively
> formalize the notion of the equality of functional operators (e.g. f(x))
> by identifying functions with their graphs. In keeping with common usage
> (as above), I will withdraw my Axiom of Functional Equality. We can
> still, however, make use of the equivalence: ALL(a):[a in dom =>
> f(a)=g(a)].

completely nonsense, G can only output pairs and know nothing about the
Function Block. You can curve fit G but that's not the function F.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97733&group=sci.math#97733

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2416:b0:69f:534:4a37 with SMTP id d22-20020a05620a241600b0069f05344a37mr3423238qkn.527.1650651472237;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:a4c:0:b0:628:b143:5bd with SMTP id z12-20020a5b0a4c000000b00628b14305bdmr6001932ybq.212.1650651472020;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=163.182.226.42; posting-account=OWfgwwgAAADQpH2XgMDMe2wuQ7OFPXlE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.182.226.42
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: Dan_Chri...@sympatico.ca (Dan Christensen)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:17:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 33
 by: Dan Christensen - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:17 UTC

On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 2:11:44 PM UTC-4, Kye Egonidis wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> > "In the relational approach, a function f: X→Y is a binary relation
> > between X and Y that associates to each element of X exactly one element
> > of Y. That is, f is defined by a set G of ordered pairs (x, y) with x ∈
> > X,
> > y ∈ Y, such that every element of X is the first component of exactly
> > one ordered pair in G. ... The set G is called the graph of f. Some
> > authors identify it with the function; however, in common usage, THE
> > FUNCTION IS GENERALLY DISTINGUISHED FROM ITS GRAPH." (My emphasis)
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_(mathematics)#Relational_approach
> >
> > It now seems to me that it may only to be possible to effectively
> > formalize the notion of the equality of functional operators (e.g. f(x))
> > by identifying functions with their graphs. In keeping with common usage
> > (as above), I will withdraw my Axiom of Functional Equality. We can
> > still, however, make use of the equivalence: ALL(a):[a in dom =>
> > f(a)=g(a)].

> completely nonsense, G can only output pairs and know nothing about the
> Function Block. You can curve fit G but that's not the function F.

Curve fitting? Are we talking about the same thing?

Dan

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97737&group=sci.math#97737

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: qli...@xuelxjxk.io (Kye Egonidis)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:25:55 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="65025"; posting-host="mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Kye Egonidis - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:25 UTC

Dan Christensen wrote:

>> > It now seems to me that it may only to be possible to effectively
>> > formalize the notion of the equality of functional operators (e.g.
>> > f(x)) by identifying functions with their graphs. In keeping with
>> > common usage (as above), I will withdraw my Axiom of Functional
>> > Equality. We can still, however, make use of the equivalence:
>> > ALL(a):[a in dom => f(a)=g(a)].
>
>> completely nonsense, G can only output pairs and know nothing about the
>> Function Block. You can curve fit G but that's not the function F.
>
> Curve fitting? Are we talking about the same thing?

Once pairs of values you have as data, the best you can do is approximate,
curve fitting, Kalman filtering etc.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97738&group=sci.math#97738

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:4104:b0:42c:1db0:da28 with SMTP id kc4-20020a056214410400b0042c1db0da28mr4501111qvb.67.1650652157729;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:649:0:b0:645:7678:7d5d with SMTP id
o9-20020a5b0649000000b0064576787d5dmr5537376ybq.483.1650652157552; Fri, 22
Apr 2022 11:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com> <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:29:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 22
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:29 UTC

Assume you have a curve f, in the real plane, and its
a function from x-axis to y-axis on the x-axis domain X.

What are these pairs then?

{ (x, f(x)) | x e X }

Kye Egonidis schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 20:26:04 UTC+2:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> >> > It now seems to me that it may only to be possible to effectively
> >> > formalize the notion of the equality of functional operators (e.g.
> >> > f(x)) by identifying functions with their graphs. In keeping with
> >> > common usage (as above), I will withdraw my Axiom of Functional
> >> > Equality. We can still, however, make use of the equivalence:
> >> > ALL(a):[a in dom => f(a)=g(a)].
> >
> >> completely nonsense, G can only output pairs and know nothing about the
> >> Function Block. You can curve fit G but that's not the function F.
> >
> > Curve fitting? Are we talking about the same thing?
> Once pairs of values you have as data, the best you can do is approximate,
> curve fitting, Kalman filtering etc.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97740&group=sci.math#97740

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:578c:0:b0:2f1:ed92:39a9 with SMTP id v12-20020ac8578c000000b002f1ed9239a9mr4345269qta.300.1650652615561;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:1cd5:0:b0:2f4:c3fc:2174 with SMTP id
c204-20020a811cd5000000b002f4c3fc2174mr6406162ywc.512.1650652615377; Fri, 22
Apr 2022 11:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com> <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:36:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 28
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:36 UTC

Anyway congratulations for challenging the point
nature of set theory. Thats quite some trolling feat,

doing in unconsciously. I also assume you don't
want to challenge the notion of continuum?

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 20:29:22 UTC+2:
> Assume you have a curve f, in the real plane, and its
> a function from x-axis to y-axis on the x-axis domain X.
>
> What are these pairs then?
>
> { (x, f(x)) | x e X }
> Kye Egonidis schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 20:26:04 UTC+2:
> > Dan Christensen wrote:
> >
> > >> > It now seems to me that it may only to be possible to effectively
> > >> > formalize the notion of the equality of functional operators (e.g.
> > >> > f(x)) by identifying functions with their graphs. In keeping with
> > >> > common usage (as above), I will withdraw my Axiom of Functional
> > >> > Equality. We can still, however, make use of the equivalence:
> > >> > ALL(a):[a in dom => f(a)=g(a)].
> > >
> > >> completely nonsense, G can only output pairs and know nothing about the
> > >> Function Block. You can curve fit G but that's not the function F.
> > >
> > > Curve fitting? Are we talking about the same thing?
> > Once pairs of values you have as data, the best you can do is approximate,
> > curve fitting, Kalman filtering etc.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<57799ae0-cb46-49c2-bfd1-9d1a2010dfa8n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97741&group=sci.math#97741

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d7cb:0:b0:444:2b27:80d3 with SMTP id g11-20020a0cd7cb000000b004442b2780d3mr4752727qvj.57.1650652656137;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:a43:0:b0:63d:c248:13a5 with SMTP id
z3-20020a5b0a43000000b0063dc24813a5mr5995817ybq.614.1650652655968; Fri, 22
Apr 2022 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=163.182.226.42; posting-account=OWfgwwgAAADQpH2XgMDMe2wuQ7OFPXlE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.182.226.42
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com> <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <57799ae0-cb46-49c2-bfd1-9d1a2010dfa8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: Dan_Chri...@sympatico.ca (Dan Christensen)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:37:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 19
 by: Dan Christensen - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:37 UTC

On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 2:26:04 PM UTC-4, Kye Egonidis wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> >> > It now seems to me that it may only to be possible to effectively
> >> > formalize the notion of the equality of functional operators (e.g.
> >> > f(x)) by identifying functions with their graphs. In keeping with
> >> > common usage (as above), I will withdraw my Axiom of Functional
> >> > Equality. We can still, however, make use of the equivalence:
> >> > ALL(a):[a in dom => f(a)=g(a)].
> >
> >> completely nonsense, G can only output pairs and know nothing about the
> >> Function Block. You can curve fit G but that's not the function F.
> >
> > Curve fitting? Are we talking about the same thing?
> Once pairs of values you have as data, the best you can do is approximate,
> curve fitting, Kalman filtering etc.

Sounds like statistics. I was talking about set theory.

Dan

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<pan$b83b7$76b2d222$5a7d721d$42e9e324@xuelxjxk.io>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97742&group=sci.math#97742

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: qli...@xuelxjxk.io (Kye Egonidis)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:38:54 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$b83b7$76b2d222$5a7d721d$42e9e324@xuelxjxk.io>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>
<pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="65025"; posting-host="mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Kye Egonidis - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:38 UTC

Mostowski Collapse wrote:

> Assume you have a curve f, in the real plane, and its a function from
> x-axis to y-axis on the x-axis domain X.
>
> What are these pairs then?
>
> { (x, f(x)) | x e X }
>
> Kye Egonidis schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 20:26:04 UTC+2:

you miss the point, stoopid, which reveals you never did math for real.
When your data come in pairs, the best you can do is approximate, it FFT,
correlation, auto-correlation, Kalman filtering, curve fitting etc, to
investigate the signal/function you go further with, along your system.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<t3uv0g$vq1$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97752&group=sci.math#97752

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nom...@afraid.org (FromTheRafters)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:17:30 -0700
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <t3uv0g$vq1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com> <d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io> <ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com> <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io> <201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com> <pan$b83b7$76b2d222$5a7d721d$42e9e324@xuelxjxk.io>
Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:17:36 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e86c5a01ed3835cefbd0908d64b67321";
logging-data="32577"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+TZklYaXSpxYild9RVoXjjUC49RHF6toU="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WaF3NlaBJ3NEdMCYS1WvMj/LK3U=
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
X-ICQ: 1701145376
 by: FromTheRafters - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:17 UTC

Kye Egonidis submitted this idea :
> Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>
>> Assume you have a curve f, in the real plane, and its a function from
>> x-axis to y-axis on the x-axis domain X.
>>
>> What are these pairs then?
>>
>> { (x, f(x)) | x e X }
>>
>> Kye Egonidis schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 20:26:04 UTC+2:
>
> you miss the point, stoopid, which reveals you never did math for real.
> When your data come in pairs, the best you can do is approximate, it FFT,
> correlation, auto-correlation, Kalman filtering, curve fitting etc, to
> investigate the signal/function you go further with, along your system.

You wandered into a discussion of set theory, not on fitting a curve.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<b2e90c28-40e5-4db6-9e06-09b8ab1db4aan@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97760&group=sci.math#97760

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d7cb:0:b0:444:2b27:80d3 with SMTP id g11-20020a0cd7cb000000b004442b2780d3mr4977115qvj.57.1650657132095;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:3ce:0:b0:644:d1dd:351c with SMTP id
t14-20020a5b03ce000000b00644d1dd351cmr5930498ybp.545.1650657131882; Fri, 22
Apr 2022 12:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pan$b83b7$76b2d222$5a7d721d$42e9e324@xuelxjxk.io>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com> <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com> <pan$b83b7$76b2d222$5a7d721d$42e9e324@xuelxjxk.io>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b2e90c28-40e5-4db6-9e06-09b8ab1db4aan@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:52:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 18
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:52 UTC

Could be micro penis trolling. LoL, good one.
What about the Nazi pairs, do they also Curve fit?

Kye Egonidis schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 20:39:07 UTC+2:
> Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>
> > Assume you have a curve f, in the real plane, and its a function from
> > x-axis to y-axis on the x-axis domain X.
> >
> > What are these pairs then?
> >
> > { (x, f(x)) | x e X }
> >
> > Kye Egonidis schrieb am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 20:26:04 UTC+2:
> you miss the point, stoopid, which reveals you never did math for real.
> When your data come in pairs, the best you can do is approximate, it FFT,
> correlation, auto-correlation, Kalman filtering, curve fitting etc, to
> investigate the signal/function you go further with, along your system.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<pan$702da$ca532b7a$462894af$4f16fec3@xuelxjxk.io>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97765&group=sci.math#97765

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: qli...@xuelxjxk.io (Kye Egonidis)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 20:53:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$702da$ca532b7a$462894af$4f16fec3@xuelxjxk.io>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>
<pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>
<pan$b83b7$76b2d222$5a7d721d$42e9e324@xuelxjxk.io>
<t3uv0g$vq1$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="53772"; posting-host="mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Kye Egonidis - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 20:53 UTC

FromTheRafters wrote:

>> you miss the point, stoopid, which reveals you never did math for real.
>> When your data come in pairs, the best you can do is approximate, it
>> FFT, correlation, auto-correlation, Kalman filtering, curve fitting
>> etc,
>> to investigate the signal/function you go further with, along your
>> system.
>
> You wandered into a discussion of set theory, not on fitting a curve.

another indolent on the rampage. I ran into a discussion of data in points
as pairs, versus functions. And "curve fitting" is just one thing one may
start investigating. As correlation, auto-correlation, FFT, Kalman
filtering etc. Guess why.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97767&group=sci.math#97767

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: qli...@xuelxjxk.io (Kye Egonidis)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:29:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>
<pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>
<f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="6591"; posting-host="mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Kye Egonidis - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:29 UTC

Mostowski Collapse wrote:

> Anyway congratulations for challenging the point nature of set theory.
> Thats quite some trolling feat,

you mean, you, the indolent fake_money impertinent.

But I start loving Trump already. What a proper punch line, ignored by
everybody that time.

TRUMP TELLS NAZI ZELENSKY
https://www.bitchute.com/video/USkUUfltydCA/

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<pan$4f936$e1c3a64e$43ccb604$2a6fff71@xuelxjxk.io>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97768&group=sci.math#97768

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: qli...@xuelxjxk.io (Kye Egonidis)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:50:54 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$4f936$e1c3a64e$43ccb604$2a6fff71@xuelxjxk.io>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>
<pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<57799ae0-cb46-49c2-bfd1-9d1a2010dfa8n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="39978"; posting-host="mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Kye Egonidis - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:50 UTC

Dan Christensen wrote:

>> > Curve fitting? Are we talking about the same thing?
>> Once pairs of values you have as data, the best you can do is
>> approximate,
>> curve fitting, Kalman filtering etc.
>
> Sounds like statistics. I was talking about set theory.

actually dynamics, you can't go further with big_data along your system.
You need the signal, or the function. Which reveals, you nazi "ukrainian"
supporters never did math and physics for real, in research, universities
and similar.

But I start loving Trump already. What a proper punch line, ignored by
everybody that time.

TRUMP TELLS NAZI ZELENSKY https://www.bitchute.com/video/USkUUfltydCA/

of course not, the nazi homo zelenske can't do that, when the nazi liberal
capitalist western europe, are providing him with *cocaine* etc etc and
etc, illegal and not easy to find.

Why capitalist western europe are using the nazis? Because no sober
citizen would fight with his life, for sake of the oligarchs enslaving
them for decades now. The sober "ukrainian" citizen sees the russian army
as *liberators*. Imagine being a citizen in fucking nazi "ukraine", living
near a *bio_weapon_laboratory*, which can be above the surface, in a
building, or underground. The last thing you'll do is to give your life
for the sake of the nazi zelenske and the oligarchs. What an impertinent
indolent idiot.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<b71f1c71-bcd3-450d-8d1e-43ea48551703n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97769&group=sci.math#97769

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1375:b0:69e:5deb:eb5e with SMTP id d21-20020a05620a137500b0069e5debeb5emr4003948qkl.53.1650664271726;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:1f07:0:b0:2f4:c74a:c970 with SMTP id
f7-20020a811f07000000b002f4c74ac970mr7179309ywf.50.1650664271596; Fri, 22 Apr
2022 14:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=163.182.226.42; posting-account=OWfgwwgAAADQpH2XgMDMe2wuQ7OFPXlE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.182.226.42
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com> <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com> <f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b71f1c71-bcd3-450d-8d1e-43ea48551703n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: Dan_Chri...@sympatico.ca (Dan Christensen)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:51:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 17
 by: Dan Christensen - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:51 UTC

On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 5:30:02 PM UTC-4, Kye Egonidis wrote:
> Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>
> > Anyway congratulations for challenging the point nature of set theory.
> > Thats quite some trolling feat,
> you mean, you, the indolent fake_money impertinent.
>
> But I start loving Trump already. What a proper punch line, ignored by
> everybody that time.
>
> TRUMP TELLS NAZI ZELENSKY
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/USkUUfltydCA/

Don't forget, Nazi boy... WAR OF AGRESSION = NAZI.

No doubt you and your boss, if he lives, will be facing the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal II. Just hope you won't be sent to a US or, worse, a Russian prison.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<pan$aa0a0$91e03044$fd1516bf$6179c71b@xuelxjxk.io>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97771&group=sci.math#97771

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: qli...@xuelxjxk.io (Kye Egonidis)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:58:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$aa0a0$91e03044$fd1516bf$6179c71b@xuelxjxk.io>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>
<pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>
<f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io>
<b71f1c71-bcd3-450d-8d1e-43ea48551703n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="48041"; posting-host="mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Kye Egonidis - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:58 UTC

Dan Christensen wrote:

>> > Anyway congratulations for challenging the point nature of set
>> > theory.
>> > Thats quite some trolling feat,
>> you mean, you, the indolent fake_money impertinent.
>>
>> But I start loving Trump already. What a proper punch line, ignored by
>> everybody that time.
>>
>> TRUMP TELLS NAZI ZELENSKY https://www.bitchute.com/video/USkUUfltydCA/
>
> Don't forget, Nazi boy... WAR OF AGRESSION = NAZI.

this math challenged indolent imbecile is not knowing war is about
aggression. Go fuck yourself some over places, you puerile behavioural
imbecile. You don't even know what functions are along a process.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<d617ec13-36ce-44f5-bb79-f230269fed2fn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97777&group=sci.math#97777

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1375:b0:69e:5deb:eb5e with SMTP id d21-20020a05620a137500b0069e5debeb5emr4104111qkl.53.1650666788637;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:1102:0:b0:645:67f1:c658 with SMTP id
2-20020a251102000000b0064567f1c658mr6725454ybr.303.1650666788472; Fri, 22 Apr
2022 15:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pan$aa0a0$91e03044$fd1516bf$6179c71b@xuelxjxk.io>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=163.182.226.42; posting-account=OWfgwwgAAADQpH2XgMDMe2wuQ7OFPXlE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.182.226.42
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com> <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com> <f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io> <b71f1c71-bcd3-450d-8d1e-43ea48551703n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$aa0a0$91e03044$fd1516bf$6179c71b@xuelxjxk.io>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d617ec13-36ce-44f5-bb79-f230269fed2fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: Dan_Chri...@sympatico.ca (Dan Christensen)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 22:33:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 18
 by: Dan Christensen - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 22:33 UTC

On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 5:58:17 PM UTC-4, Kye Egonidis wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> >> > Anyway congratulations for challenging the point nature of set
> >> > theory.
> >> > Thats quite some trolling feat,
> >> you mean, you, the indolent fake_money impertinent.
> >>
> >> But I start loving Trump already. What a proper punch line, ignored by
> >> everybody that time.
> >>
> >> TRUMP TELLS NAZI ZELENSKY https://www.bitchute.com/video/USkUUfltydCA/
> >
> > Don't forget, Nazi boy... WAR OF AGRESSION = NAZI.
> this math challenged indolent imbecile is not knowing war is about
> aggression. Go fuck yourself some over places, you puerile behavioural
> imbecile. You don't even know what functions are along a process.

HA, HA! If you had done better in math, you probably wouldn't have to be prostituting yourself like this for a known war criminal.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<pan$2536f$58845826$90331c05$ac9d1222@xuelxjxk.io>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97778&group=sci.math#97778

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: qli...@xuelxjxk.io (Kye Egonidis)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 22:35:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$2536f$58845826$90331c05$ac9d1222@xuelxjxk.io>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>
<pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>
<f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io>
<b71f1c71-bcd3-450d-8d1e-43ea48551703n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$aa0a0$91e03044$fd1516bf$6179c71b@xuelxjxk.io>
<d617ec13-36ce-44f5-bb79-f230269fed2fn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="60511"; posting-host="mLipwYpzeQOxl5Glx+csOw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Kye Egonidis - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 22:35 UTC

Dan Christensen wrote:

>> > Don't forget, Nazi boy... WAR OF AGRESSION = NAZI.
>> this math challenged indolent imbecile is not knowing war is about
>> aggression. Go fuck yourself some over places, you puerile behavioural
>> imbecile. You don't even know what functions are along a process.
>
> HA, HA! If you had done better in math, you probably wouldn't have to be
> prostituting yourself like this for a known war criminal.

that's a double negation, idiot. You say "aggression" two times, since war
includes aggression already. Gee, you are so stupid.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<8cb02644-57ac-45ea-a12d-e2e6628b1ca6n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97780&group=sci.math#97780

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e71a:0:b0:69e:a5f4:e5f2 with SMTP id m26-20020ae9e71a000000b0069ea5f4e5f2mr4208737qka.662.1650668106069;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:e296:0:b0:2f7:c169:126f with SMTP id
l144-20020a0de296000000b002f7c169126fmr2207527ywe.431.1650668105831; Fri, 22
Apr 2022 15:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pan$2536f$58845826$90331c05$ac9d1222@xuelxjxk.io>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com> <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com> <f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io> <b71f1c71-bcd3-450d-8d1e-43ea48551703n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$aa0a0$91e03044$fd1516bf$6179c71b@xuelxjxk.io> <d617ec13-36ce-44f5-bb79-f230269fed2fn@googlegroups.com>
<pan$2536f$58845826$90331c05$ac9d1222@xuelxjxk.io>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8cb02644-57ac-45ea-a12d-e2e6628b1ca6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 22:55:06 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 17
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 22:55 UTC

So my guess was right, its Luigi aka micro penis,
nymshifter and Nazi friend. ruSSia is Z, Ukraine
will show them !Z. The triple negation law is:

!!!Z = !Z

Kye Egonidis schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 00:35:14 UTC+2:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> >> > Don't forget, Nazi boy... WAR OF AGRESSION = NAZI.
> >> this math challenged indolent imbecile is not knowing war is about
> >> aggression. Go fuck yourself some over places, you puerile behavioural
> >> imbecile. You don't even know what functions are along a process.
> >
> > HA, HA! If you had done better in math, you probably wouldn't have to be
> > prostituting yourself like this for a known war criminal.
> that's a double negation, idiot. You say "aggression" two times, since war
> includes aggression already. Gee, you are so stupid.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<dc0dce0e-0247-4f6f-bef4-b4f2cb41cfdan@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97781&group=sci.math#97781

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5f13:0:b0:2f1:f414:e037 with SMTP id x19-20020ac85f13000000b002f1f414e037mr5014285qta.257.1650668374162;
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:b0:645:8009:911f with SMTP id
z13-20020a25868d000000b006458009911fmr6718207ybk.339.1650668373983; Fri, 22
Apr 2022 15:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8cb02644-57ac-45ea-a12d-e2e6628b1ca6n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com> <pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com> <pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com> <f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io> <b71f1c71-bcd3-450d-8d1e-43ea48551703n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$aa0a0$91e03044$fd1516bf$6179c71b@xuelxjxk.io> <d617ec13-36ce-44f5-bb79-f230269fed2fn@googlegroups.com>
<pan$2536f$58845826$90331c05$ac9d1222@xuelxjxk.io> <8cb02644-57ac-45ea-a12d-e2e6628b1ca6n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <dc0dce0e-0247-4f6f-bef4-b4f2cb41cfdan@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 22:59:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 32
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 22:59 UTC

Via sci.physics:

> "!Z" is pronounced "Not Z" ( c, c++, c#, Java, etc. ).
>
> Emblem of the Azov (Азов) Regiment ( Z with a line through it, Ƶ ):
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/AZOV_logo.svg/545px-AZOV_logo.svg.png

LoL

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 00:55:11 UTC+2:
> So my guess was right, its Luigi aka micro penis,
> nymshifter and Nazi friend. ruSSia is Z, Ukraine
> will show them !Z. The triple negation law is:
>
> !!!Z = !Z
> Kye Egonidis schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 00:35:14 UTC+2:
> > Dan Christensen wrote:
> >
> > >> > Don't forget, Nazi boy... WAR OF AGRESSION = NAZI.
> > >> this math challenged indolent imbecile is not knowing war is about
> > >> aggression. Go fuck yourself some over places, you puerile behavioural
> > >> imbecile. You don't even know what functions are along a process.
> > >
> > > HA, HA! If you had done better in math, you probably wouldn't have to be
> > > prostituting yourself like this for a known war criminal.
> > that's a double negation, idiot. You say "aggression" two times, since war
> > includes aggression already. Gee, you are so stupid.

Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work

<t3vcjm$p0j$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=97782&group=sci.math#97782

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Uh3cGLv3BUP05xA/L7flqA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:09:44 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t3vcjm$p0j$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <0abbe4e6-fec8-48fa-96a9-c5328dcb7bb8n@googlegroups.com>
<d7b93d47-1607-4501-840e-b20014bbf210n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$e8057$9e0b5d60$489e07c5$87e413f9@xuelxjxk.io>
<ef3f05dd-3a85-4f96-b561-af9498a397ean@googlegroups.com>
<pan$8c870$10235e97$89de06d0$f09779d0@xuelxjxk.io>
<201889de-f96b-4bb8-86cd-147cb1381a1en@googlegroups.com>
<f236fb6f-c1af-4830-8b83-fe7877476566n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$b46f5$48641089$eb657825$2afbc8fd@xuelxjxk.io>
<b71f1c71-bcd3-450d-8d1e-43ea48551703n@googlegroups.com>
<pan$aa0a0$91e03044$fd1516bf$6179c71b@xuelxjxk.io>
<d617ec13-36ce-44f5-bb79-f230269fed2fn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="25619"; posting-host="Uh3cGLv3BUP05xA/L7flqA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.6.1
Content-Language: en-US
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Michael Moroney - Fri, 22 Apr 2022 23:09 UTC

On 4/22/2022 6:33 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 5:58:17 PM UTC-4, Kye Egonidis wrote:
>> Dan Christensen wrote:
>>
>>>>> Anyway congratulations for challenging the point nature of set
>>>>> theory.
>>>>> Thats quite some trolling feat,
>>>> you mean, you, the indolent fake_money impertinent.
>>>>
>>>> But I start loving Trump already. What a proper punch line, ignored by
>>>> everybody that time.
>>>>
>>>> TRUMP TELLS NAZI ZELENSKY https://www.bitchute.com/video/USkUUfltydCA/
>>>
>>> Don't forget, Nazi boy... WAR OF AGRESSION = NAZI.
>> this math challenged indolent imbecile is not knowing war is about
>> aggression. Go fuck yourself some over places, you puerile behavioural
>> imbecile. You don't even know what functions are along a process.
>
> HA, HA! If you had done better in math, you probably wouldn't have to be prostituting yourself like this for a known war criminal.

Nymshifter, I hope you are aware that they are already making cases
against some 560 or so Russian war criminals. Are you one of them? Where
will you hide once the Ukrainian blue and gold flies proudly over the
Kremlin?

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor