Sorry for my gross undersight, with not including Dirac and Feynman as the 7th King of Science, leaving AP as 8th. Sorry

My 184th published book

History of the Kings of Science of Earth// sociology
by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface: In early April of 2022, a PBS TV program documentary of Benjamin Franklin aired on TV, a 4 hour movie in two segments. I knew the history of Ben Franklin, but never in such detail. As the program entertained me immensely, and we must admit that in life, TV has become a great social entertainment (sociology linking up all humans) that is vital to our social psyche, but that this show inspired me to write a book on the Kings of Science, not realizing that Ben Franklin should be considered a King of Science. And especially writing a book in the midst of a Russian invasion of Ukraine that may escalate into a nuclear war because Russia has an insane leader Putin, and why Science Councils with Kings of Science are so important for all of humanity going forward into the future.

Cover Picture: Is of course the German statue Siegessaule that comes closest in my mind of a King of Science figurehead. This is my iphone photograph of Siegessaule.

-------------------------------
Table of Contents
-------------------------------

1) My history on this topic.

2) List of Earth's Kings of Science.

3) Missing two of the greatest scientists of the 20th century, who electrified planet Earth.

4) As King of Science, AP has the duty to steer Earth from a nuclear war.

5) The two episodes of Ben Franklin documentary on TV.

6) The first time I had written the idea of "King of Science".

7) Defining the concept "King of Science".

8) What contributing factors make a King of Science.

9) Timeline on the Kings of Science.

10) AP program for the future.

11) Evidence of Superdeterminism in Kings of Science.

I know what was going through my mind that I left out Feynman and Dirac, was that their physics is mostly replaced by AP with the real true electron being the muon and not the 0.5MeV particle. And the fact that especially Dirac was so taciturn in social moving and social movement. And I place the two of them together, just like Edison and Tesla, for Feynman did have a social movement going, for he lead physics with his textbooks of Feynman Lectures on Physics. Here is where even AP's mind was shaped for the future as a youngster in College reading that the most important single fact in all of physics is the Atomic Fact-- all things are made up of atoms. But Feynman had such a following that he was almost a physics cult figure, and that is very much a social gathering leadership.

But the reason I must and should include Dirac and Feynman is that both made sure that in the 20th century, that it was Quantum Electrodynamics QED that became the tops in physics and not all the surrounding chatterbox noise fakery of General Relativity, Standard Model and mindless black holes and other assorted nonsense.

Many of Feynman's exchanges with physicists was in adversity with the prevailing Standard Model-- complaining that "how can algebra tell us the Nature of physics". Both Feynman and Dirac built their physics reputation on electricity and magnetism, QED.

And if not for Dirac's insistence of the magnetic monopole, where would AP be in 2016-2017 upon realizing the true electron was the muon and the proton was 840MeV not 938MeV. Where would I be, if not for Dirac insisting on the existence of the magnetic monopole. For upon discovery of the real true electron is muon, what on Earth could I say the 0.5MeV particle was? Of course, I immediately said in 2017 that the 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole. But if Dirac had not been around in the 20th century, I may never have found what the 0.5MeV particle truly had to be.

So I apologize for being too harsh with missing Dirac and Feynman as a pair of Kings of Science, just like Edison and Tesla were a pair of Kings.

And the gap in time from one King of Science to another would have been too long from Edison and Tesla to AP. That is almost 120 years time gap. So with Dirac & Feynman we can say QED was 1960 and then 60 years later we have AP with Atom Totality and true electron is muon with the primal axiom over all of physics-- All is Atom and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism.

Sorry to both Dirac and Feynman for the slight. Every new generation of scientists, where we see 30 years as a single generation interval. That 120 years would have been 4 generations. And 60 years would be 2 generations. Too much in science takes place over 60 years that we need to evaluate the leadership in science.

AP