Let's define orbit X - the orbit first GPS satellite was
placed at.

During a solar day a Cs clock placed on orbit X will count
about 0.000038*9 192 631 770 periods more than
a Cs clock placed on Earth. Right? Isn't it one of your
magnificient predictions?

Considering the definitions valid in the time when this
prediction was made - it means: the frequency of
Cs on orbit X will be by (4/9 192 631 770) higher than
on Earth. Sorry, poor halfbarains, the predictions of
your idiot guru were denying each other; what a pity,
they were sooooo ingenious:(

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 6:10:17 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> Let's define orbit X - the orbit first GPS satellite was
> placed at.
>
> During a solar day a Cs clock placed on orbit X will count
> about 0.000038*9 192 631 770 periods more than
> a Cs clock placed on Earth. Right? Isn't it one of your
> magnificient predictions?
>
> Considering the definitions valid in the time when this
> prediction was made - it means: the frequency of
> Cs on orbit X will be by (4/9 192 631 770) higher than
> on Earth. Sorry, poor halfbarains, the predictions of
> your idiot guru were denying each other; what a pity,
> they were sooooo ingenious:(

In a recent post you wrote that the die hard relativist JanPB is "a woman". Is that so? I'm confused, as I call he/she "Piotr",
but it seems that he/she doesn't like it: Jan Piotr Belawski.

Can you confirm?

On Thursday, 27 October 2022 at 19:20:50 UTC+2, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 6:10:17 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Let's define orbit X - the orbit first GPS satellite was
> > placed at.
> >
> > During a solar day a Cs clock placed on orbit X will count
> > about 0.000038*9 192 631 770 periods more than
> > a Cs clock placed on Earth. Right? Isn't it one of your
> > magnificient predictions?
> >
> > Considering the definitions valid in the time when this
> > prediction was made - it means: the frequency of
> > Cs on orbit X will be by (4/9 192 631 770) higher than
> > on Earth. Sorry, poor halfbarains, the predictions of
> > your idiot guru were denying each other; what a pity,
> > they were sooooo ingenious:(
> In a recent post you wrote that the die hard relativist JanPB is "a woman". Is that so?

No, I didn't.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 7:20:50 PM UTC+2, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 6:10:17 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Let's define orbit X - the orbit first GPS satellite was
> > placed at.
> >
> > During a solar day a Cs clock placed on orbit X will count
> > about 0.000038*9 192 631 770 periods more than
> > a Cs clock placed on Earth. Right? Isn't it one of your
> > magnificient predictions?
> >
> > Considering the definitions valid in the time when this
> > prediction was made - it means: the frequency of
> > Cs on orbit X will be by (4/9 192 631 770) higher than
> > on Earth. Sorry, poor halfbarains, the predictions of
> > your idiot guru were denying each other; what a pity,
> > they were sooooo ingenious:(
> In a recent post you wrote that the die hard relativist JanPB is "a woman". Is that so? I'm confused, as I call he/she "Piotr",
> but it seems that he/she doesn't like it: Jan Piotr Belawski.
>
> Can you confirm?

I am a guy and my middle name is not Piotr.

I am not a die hard relativist either, I'll be very happy to see relativity replaced
by something better. What I speak against, though, is claims against
relativity that are based on either lies or ignorance. It's just a general
life principle, not really that of physics. That's why I defended Trump,
despite my having problems with him, and people calling me
names on FB and here because of that.

It's like this in life in general: if you guys want to defeat something (or
someone), the first prerequisite is to stop fantasising about that thing
(or that someone).

That's one standard reason dictators fall: they start believing their own
fantasies about their enemies.

--
Jan

On Thursday, 27 October 2022 at 20:01:29 UTC+2, JanPB wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 7:20:50 PM UTC+2, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 6:10:17 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Let's define orbit X - the orbit first GPS satellite was
> > > placed at.
> > >
> > > During a solar day a Cs clock placed on orbit X will count
> > > about 0.000038*9 192 631 770 periods more than
> > > a Cs clock placed on Earth. Right? Isn't it one of your
> > > magnificient predictions?
> > >
> > > Considering the definitions valid in the time when this
> > > prediction was made - it means: the frequency of
> > > Cs on orbit X will be by (4/9 192 631 770) higher than
> > > on Earth. Sorry, poor halfbarains, the predictions of
> > > your idiot guru were denying each other; what a pity,
> > > they were sooooo ingenious:(
> > In a recent post you wrote that the die hard relativist JanPB is "a woman". Is that so? I'm confused, as I call he/she "Piotr",
> > but it seems that he/she doesn't like it: Jan Piotr Belawski.
> >
> > Can you confirm?
> I am a guy and my middle name is not Piotr.
>
> I am not a die hard relativist either, I'll be very happy to see relativity replaced
> by something better.

Buhahahahahaha.

What I speak against, though, is claims against
> relativity that are based on either lies or ignorance.

Rather, your idiocy was proven inconsistent and you
have nothing but spitting in its defense. But what to
wxpect from a fanatic cultist.