Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Jul 28, 2022, 5:50:22 PM (19 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright I am in a sweet spot of research here, but I have to be careful in interpretation.

Strong Nuclear = 1
EM = 1/137
Weak Nuclear = 10^-6
gravity = 10^-39

Now I was looking around for that figure 10^-39 to see if it can be 10^-38 rather than 10^-39

Most definitely that is 10^-38 because we can alter the "use of what mass" whether a proton at 840MeV with true electron as muon 105MeV, and thus 10^-38 is the actual true number for coupling between strong nuclear and gravity.

Now the above can have a entry of PSI^2 of Schrodinger Equation.

Strong Nuclear = 1 PSI^2 = 1
EM = (1/137) = 0.0072 PSI^2 = 0.0848
Weak Nuclear = 10^-6 PSI^2 = 10^-12
gravity = 10^-38 PSI^2 = 10^-19

This helps enormously in interpretation, for the 10^-38 is a mirror reflection of the magnetic monopole 1.61*10^-19 Coulomb.

The EM of 0.848 is of course the interpretation of the Proton torus is 840MeV as a 8 ring torus with muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law.

So, yes, by exploring Ecology and biology science, by luck, I find myself seeing and straightening-out pure physics, the geometry of Electromagnetism.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Jul 28, 2022, 10:35:13 PM (15 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:33:01 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> Now of course the Weak Nuclear force at 10^-6 is that of 1.2*10^-6 in the magnetic monopole permeability constant and that the psi^2 is the electric field constant permittivity and is 1.44*10^-12.
>
> So the coupling force strength table is much like the EM Spectrum table, that shows the relationship of forces as if they are EM wavelength and frequency.
>
> But now let us talk about Ecology, a generalization of biology. Ecology is larger than biology for it relates biology with physical and chemical environment. And here we can go back in time to Ancient Greeks. And to a first Ecology idea, perhaps the beginning of Ecology science in human history with Plato's and Aristotle's "Being and Becoming".
>
> Plato invented "Being and Becoming" as perhaps the first Dynamic process of the science of biology. Taken up by his pupil Aristotle. Of course without doubt Aristotle is the first biologist, a systematic biologist as a Ancient Linneaus in classification of life. And the "Being and Becoming" is the Darwin theory of evolution of early Ancient Greek biology.
>
> And in a capsule overview of Plato and Aristotle Being & Becoming, is that of birth and then the growth of the individual. Being the birth, and becoming the growing up and becoming what they become.
>
> And so, naturally, early science would be more about biology than about physics and chemistry. Until the rise of chemistry and physics by the 1800s through 1900s.
>
> So Being & Becoming would enshrine biology from Plato and Aristotle to Darwin when evolution theory replaces Being & Becoming and finally, Chemistry and Quantum Mechanics enlarged the concept of Being & Becoming. Ironically, Being & Becoming was not thrown out but enlarged. For what happened is that Schrodinger Wave equation of collapsed wavefunction was being and that uncollapsed wavefunction gives birth to Being.
>
> So we have a schematic of Ecology.
>
> Uncollapsed Wavefunction in which waves of electric and magnetic fields. When these uncollapsed wavefunctions collapse, gives rise to material and is birth. Once borne, the Being moves through life to a Becoming.
>
> So the Ancient Being & Becoming, just did not start early enough, before the Being.
>
> So we can speak of birth as a actualization and now it has potential to becoming several things. But before birth actualization there was a pre-birth potential, a potential of unformed energy coming together to form a birth..
>
> Now, why talk about this of potential uncollapsed wavefunction to collapsed wavefunction of birth-being to that of potential to becoming. Why talk of this? Because it is embodied in this table.

> Strong Nuclear = 1 PSI^2 = 1
> EM = (1/137) = 0.0072 PSI^2 = 0.0848
> Weak Nuclear = 10^-6 PSI^2 = 10^-12 permeability and permittivity
> gravity = 10^-38 PSI^2 = 10^-19 monopole force 1.61*10^-19 coulombs
>
> AP, King of Science, especially physics-chemistry
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Jul 28, 2022, 11:52:45 PM (13 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
I wrote:
> Strong Nuclear = 1 PSI^2 = 1
> EM = (1/137) = 0.0072 PSI^2 = 0.0848
> Weak Nuclear = 10^-6 PSI^2 = 10^-12 permeability and permittivity
> gravity = 10^-38 PSI^2 = 10^-19 monopole force 1.61*10^-19 coulombs
>

So, well, permeability is magnetic permeability is 1.2*10^-6 N*A^-2 and permittivity is before divided by 6 is 8.8*10^-12 F*m^-1. After we divide permittivity by 6 we have 1.4*10^-12 F*m^-1. Why do we divide permittivity by 6? Because electric field is in Lewis Structure that of 6 as in 6 faces of a cube.

And so we see that permeability as Psi and then squared yields permittivity (1.2*10^-6)^2 = 1.4*10^-12

The Psi squared of monopole force 1.61*10^-19 Coulomb, that squared is 10^-38, the gravity strength per strong nuclear strength at 1.

And what this tells us, is the geometry of Electricity Magnetism force on the outer surface of a sphere, a sphere of electricity inside a Parallel Plate Capacitor. This means that gravity is the smallest force of attraction and its geometry is the surface of a sphere.

This relates to Ecology, as being not a Food Energy Pyramid but a surface area of a sphere.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
1:03 AM (12 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
For notice that permeability times permittivity (pre division by 6) equals Monopole strength of 1.6*10^-19 C.

(1.2*10^-6) * (8.8*10^-12) = 10.5*10^-18 and in scientific notation is 1*10^-19.

The thread that I am weaving together here is that of Ecology being electricity stored as the surface of a sphere inside of a Parallel Plate Capacitor of Physics. And this would make sense as to why all of Earth has 10^50 atoms and 10^38 of those atoms are atoms of Life, all on the surface of Earth. I am combining the geometry of pure physics of electricity stored in a capacitor with the fact that Life exists on a surface of a planet and has to deal with O2 intake, CO2 outflow and CO2 intake and O2 outflow.

We all think in science, especially biology and astronomy, that water is the key for life on other planets. No, in fact, the key is CO2 interchange with O2 is the key, and water is a sub-key, a secondary demand.

You can have a planet or moon full of water, but no life established, for the reason that you cannot interchange Animal CO2 with O2. This is likely to be the case on Europa, that some lifeforms may exist, but not in a plant with animal commensalism needed to terraform Europa with life.

Remember first life is merely a capacitor itself, for the electricity inside a capacitor is perfect-DNA, and if the conditions are suitable, that capacitor becomes a organism-- a bacteria or plant. But if the air supply is not suitable of CO2 and O2 then the planet will not be terraformed.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
3:20 AM (10 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, getting to the crux of the argument for Ecology Food Web. Plants comprise 82% biomass requiring animal-CO2 while Animals fungi and bacteria included breathing in O2 comprise 18% biomass. If we take a grid system onto the sphere surface, then the lines of longitude with latitude lines comprise 18% while the slantitude lines comprise 82%.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
1:18 PM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

Of course the 82% plants is biomass with all of animals comprising the remaining 18%.
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:17:44 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Alright, getting to the crux of the argument for Ecology Food Web. Plants comprise 82% while Animals fungi and bacteria included comprise 18%. If we take a grid system onto the sphere surface, then the lines of longitude with latitude lines comprise 18% while the slantitude lines comprise 82%.

Strong Nuclear = 1 PSI^2 = 1
EM = (1/137) = 0.0072 PSI^2 = 0.0848
Weak Nuclear = 10^-6 PSI^2 = 10^-12 permeability and permittivity
gravity = 10^-38 PSI^2 = 10^-19 monopole force 1.61*10^-19 coulombs

But let me see if I can sharpen the figures from research of the 82% with 18%. For I suspect the prefix numbers should be 84% versus 16%. Recall that the Golden Ratio is 1.61 with 0.61. These numbers are so important and baked into physics, just as pi is baked into physics in almost every number constant of physics.

The permittivity constant as listed is 8.8*10^-12 F*m^-1

Notice the Fine Structure Constant is 0.0072 but psi squared of FSC is 0.084. So we have to ask, is permittivity really that of 8.4*10^-12 rather than 8.8? What is the Sigma Error involved if we use 8.4 rather than 8.8? 8.8/8..4 = 4.7%. Usually we like to keep sigma error from 0.5% or below for equality. But in the case of Permittivity, it is measured with instruments of electricity itself, electrictity trying to measure electricity, and in those cases, a sigma error of 5% or below is equality.

So I am saying that the truer, the more true value of Permittivity of physics is 8.4*10^-12 F*m^-1.

And then the more true value of biology measuring plants biomass versus animal biomass is 84% versus 16%. It is difficult, very difficult for biologists to measure accurately the fungi and bacteria underground in the soil and these are animals exchanging O2 expelling Animal-CO2 for plant roots to grow.

Now, switching over to pure math.

Let me talk about longitude, latitude and slantitude to see if I can come up with 84 to 16 ratio. I have a 4 by 4 Grid

* * * *
* * * *
* * * *
* * * *

And I ask the question, how many longitude and latitude lines? And I see 4 + 4 = 8.

Now I ask for how many lines of slantitude, lines comprised of at least 2 points and at a slant angle to longitude or latitude. And I come up with 10 +32 = 42.

If I multiply 8 by 2 and then multiply 42 by 2, I end up with 16 as 16% for animal biomass and 84% for plant biomass. I end up with the Permittivity of physics as 8.4 prefix and of course, the all important golden ratio number of 1.61 appears in 16. And the Lewis Structure of 6 is the all important golden ratio number 0.61 but short for 6.

Now of course the many idiots of science will call AP a numerologist, numerology here there and everywhere. And one only needs to look at these idiots and ask why they are such mindless idiots to ever end up in science for they could never even see that a slant cut in a right-circular cone was never a ellipse but was a oval. You see, idiots of science have a mind that wants to hate people who understand and explain the truth of science, and end up calling them numerologists. We expect idiots to do nothing but hate hate hate before they ever do science itself.

AP, King of Science, especially physics-chemistry