On 15/01/2022 03:53, LegionX wrote:
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> I think he likely was tied to them... but from what he has shown in this groupI see no real skills with coding.
>
> He was friends with the others in VX. His viruses are 100% his
> original code tho. He didn't even use a tutorial to help with his
> first one - as many others did. There were no tutorials for him
> to go by - he opted to write them in a language that wasn't
> friendly to the task. What can we say? He likes a challenge.
>
>
> So he was on his own from start to finish. It's easier to write a
> virus in pure assembler than it is to write one using an HLL. And
> Gremlin didn't pick an HLL with many hand holding features to do
> this with. He selected an odd duck called ASiC. That language
> barely qualifies as an HLL. It's barely above assembler. It has a
> grand total of 80 internal commands. Anything else you want or
> need from it has to be provided by you. Either using it or
> another language to add functionality.
>
> We did tell your stupid ass - almost everyone with HHI has
> comparable skillsets. Most of us are coders - like Gremlin. This
> is why we understood what he did and for the most part why he did
> it.
>
> We disagreed with him on the entire release aspect. We've had many
> a discussion with him about that code. And the dataloss his viral
> code was responsible for. We are his friend but that doesn't mean
> we turned a blind eye to the stupid and harmful code he wrote
> either. We didn't have a problem with the coding aspect. It can
> be mentally stimulating to write self replicating code that can
> evade your systems defenses. We understood that. We didn't agree
> with their release in any manner..
>
> snit did you know that he got two legit av never expires licenses
> for regged copies in his real name while an active vxer? He did a
> deal with them. In exchange for regged copies of their warez he
> would email a fresh binary of his latest digital bug twenty four
> hours before it was provided on his pro virus website. Av got a
> 24 hour heads up and he got full access to their software with
> his own personalized registration key.
>
> So some Av already knew Raid aka Gremlins real information. The
> only avers to try and dox him though was Sophos. He kept
> embarrasing clueless cluley so cluley thought he'd pay Gremlin
> back and disclosed his first and last name in a virus bulletin
> article.
>
> The more David brings up for the purposes of sliming him - the
> more pathetic people learn you really are for trying to paint
> Gremlin out as a functionally illiterate and incompetent fraud.
> He's already forgotten more about computers than you, David
> Brooks, and Steve Carroll combined even know about the machine
> sitting in front of you. He can school all three of you on
> hardware software and networking. If that's not enough of an ass
> kicking, thanks to his secondary trade skills as an electrician
> he can run new dedicated circuits for those computers. He doesn't
> need to call a system builder a network engineer or an
> electrician. He's trained certified and has skill in all
> three.
>
> And if you're claiming that you've seen nothing involving skill
> from Gremlin - why did you and only you have such a hard time
> with duplicating his AZ program? What does that say about you
> snit? How based on the struggle you had doing that can anyone
> assume you're in a position to be able to determine who does and
> who doesn't have skill?
>
>> Carroll blows him away.
>
> Hows that? Carroll has shared script. Gremlin has shared actual
> source code for a binary when it's compiled. You had a hell of a
> time porting one of his simple programs called AZ so what makes
> you even think you're qualified to determine that Carroll has
> done as you wrote?
>
> We haven't seen him discuss a disassembly of an executable. We
> have seen Gremlin have such discussions.
>
>> Heck, I am a shitty scripter and we each have done things the other has failed to be able to do,or at least easily do.
>
> We doubt that you could write anything in script that Gremlin and
> or Steve Carroll couldn't duplicate with relative ease. The fact
> you admit you're a shitty scripter should tell most who
> understand logic and can apply it - that you are not even semi
> qualified or knowledgeable enough on the subject to give any
> opinion. Let alone the one you have. So logically speaking the
> only reason you made the comment was to try and take a cheap shot
> at Gremlin because you aren't even close to being in the same
> league. And because you cannot stand the fact they get along and
> either of them can school your master in it holding dumbass
> without really even trying.
>
> You are so desperate that you wish Gremlin needed help to write
> those viruses. It chaps your ass that he did not. And it's
> absolutely burning you up seeing all this disclosed about him. A
> disclosure which has *destroyed* the label you pulled from your
> arsehole to describe and slime him for search engine seeding.
>
>
> Even you can see the writing on the wall here. You know you
> royally fucked up in writing that bs description of Gremlin. And
> now you're wondering how you can revise and sell a new story.
> Rather than admit you lied about him. Yet again.
>
>
> He can't be as you described and have a background anything like
> the one David has brought up. Again - totally destroying the
> known false description you wrote for him to feed the floodbot
> for the specific purpose of screwing him over with search
> engines. You're a total dishonest pile of pigshit. You fucked up.
> Everybody knows you fucked up for sure now too snit. For
> sure.
>
> You're going to have to come up with something else. The past
> David shared for the purposes of fucking Gremlin over have
> instead - exposed you for having lied multiple times about
> Gremlin.
>
> David is so focused on revenge that he doesn't give a second
> thought about posting material about Gremlin which directly
> contradicts your story you fabricated to describe
> Gremlin.
>
> We told you that David wasn't your friend. Again because of his
> immense hatred of Gremlin he has confirmed you have lied about
> Gremlin. He doesn't care about the position he's placed you in -
> it's all about getting even with Gremlin. He tried to dox Gremlin
> unprovoked some years back. Gremlin performed a proper righteous
> and well deserved followup David doxxing two years after David
> initiated. It's been about getting even since then. You're
> nothing more than a pawn in his game. When the fuck are you going
> to wake up and realize that?
>
> Doesn't matter that he tossed you under the bus and will
> repeatedly do so if he thinks he can get one over on Gremlin or
> con someone into thinking Gremlin is an evil person who needs to
> be hungout to dry.
>
> David is so focused on this he challenged every attempt you made
> to infer Gremlin used someone elses code to work from - as you
> did with your bots - and continued to dismiss and correct you.
> Ouch. What David did was torpedo your anti Gremlin description
> that wasn't ever based on facts.
>
> When it comes to Gremlin - for David - you're nothing more than a
> means to an end. He was hoping you were more intelligent with
> skills you don't have so that you could help him with Gremlin. He
> has come to the realization that Gremlin would use you as a
> chewtoy. You do not have the abilities David assumed you did.
> Therefore you aren't as valuable to David as he initially thought
> you would be.
>
> He hasn such little confidence in your ability to square off with
> Gremlin that he has attempted to protect you from Gremlin. If he
> thought you could deal with Gremlin or us on your own - he
> wouldn't have. Yes snit - David knows that you're in way over
> your head. And now thanks to his xposting efforts the cocky
> posters from rec.photo.digital aren't interested in playing along
> anymore.
>
> Hh mistook Gremlin for being a weak usenet troll - he went by
> Davids words without fact checking. Probably wise of him to stop
> trying to help David dox him when he did. Because - it's one
> thing to get a smartass attitude with someone you mistake as
> being a regular joe for an infamous former blackhat hacker isn't
> it. :)

You really should stop exposing yourself in public!