One of the beauties of Google search and archive, is almost instant recollection of years gone by data. This was data collected below in 2016-2017 by my powerful multimeter. Seems as though peat moss was extra abundant in voltage, and thus electricity. And I have to wonder if the fungus that makes up so much of the soil is there for a largest possible constant electricity current in the soil.

For years and years I have pondered why only cedar tree seeds can sprout in the soil. If we are to say that seeds are not alive until sufficient electric current is pushed through the seed by soil electricity, and that there is insuffient electric current in South Dakota soil, but sufficient electric current in Oregon and Washington state soils, may go to answering why only cedar seeds have a start in South Dakota.

page51, 7-1, First life started as a capacitor, perhaps stars/planets start that way also/ Atom Totality textbook, 8th ed.
5 views
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Nov 29, 2017, 10:12:28 PM



to
page51, 7-1, First life started as a capacitor, perhaps stars/planets start that way also/ Atom Totality textbook, 8th ed.

1) Alright, I cannot think of any formula that is important in biology, except for Cell Theory, and the formula there, of course, is A= BCD in which the BCD is volume of the cell. So, one can think of the cell is to biology what the atom is to physics. For the prime formula of physics is A = BCD from which we see the New Ohm's law comes from as V= iBL. It is nice to know that Biology also starts with the basic formula A = BCD and is volume and the surface of the cell is so, so, very important. So when we want to discover what the world's first life was, and where it comes from. It comes from volume with the surface being extremely important. And this describes in physics the Capacitor. The capacitor as a prime, fundamental unit, which would become the cell in Biology.

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:41:51 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Reporting data on Capacitor strength for aluminum and carbon
graphite// 29mfarads, 19mfarads, 0 mfarads
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 02:41:51 +0000

Reporting data on Capacitor strength for aluminum and carbon graphite// 29mfarads, 19mfarads, 0 mfarads

Alright, I have my lab set up to handle microfarad readings for capacitors. I especially want farads for carbon, since First Life was a Capacitor of carbon.

So I have carbon graphite paper.

I have a telephone book to press the sheets of graphite and aluminum.

For dielectrics I use paper, or graphite.

I found 0 mfarads for graphite with paper dielectric

I found 29mfarads for aluminum with paper dielectric

I found 19mfarads for aluminum and using graphite paper as dielectric

Now, can I say that graphite paper has capacitance, even though it read 0 ?

I have some carbon in pencil form, so will test that next.

What I like to have-- is a mfarad reading for carbon.

If I make a theory that First Life was Capacitor, pretty tough to have a theory as such if carbon cannot be a capacitor.

So, I got 0 mfarad for graph paper, 29mfarad for aluminum, and 19 mfarad for aluminum with dielectric as graph paper.

AP

On Sunday, April 16, 2017 at 4:31:47 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Now I need to re-do this experiment to where I have one piece of aluminum, graphite paper, and paper for dielectric.

AP

On Sunday, April 16, 2017 at 11:46:22 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

On Sunday, April 16, 2017 at 4:31:47 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now I need to re-do this experiment to where I have one piece of aluminum, graphite paper, and paper for dielectric.
>
> AP

Alright, good, good,good, good, good,

I did the experiment of paper as insulator (dielectric) of aluminum 1 sheet with graphite paper as 2nd sheet and got 0 mfarad

I then pulled out two graphite rods 30cm long by .75cm diameter with a paper dielectric between the two rods. I registered 2mfarads

AP

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 19:58:32 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Capacitor strength for aluminum and carbon graphite// 29mfarads, 8mfarads
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:58:32 +0000

Capacitor strength for aluminum and carbon graphite// 29mfarads, 8mfarads

On Sunday, April 16, 2017 at 11:46:22 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Sunday, April 16, 2017 at 4:31:47 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Now I need to re-do this experiment to where I have one piece of aluminum, graphite paper, and paper for dielectric.
> >
> > AP
>
> Alright, good, good,good, good, good,
>
> I did the experiment of paper as insulator (dielectric) of aluminum 1 sheet with graphite paper as 2nd sheet and got 0 mfarad

The two aluminum sheets are 12cm by 12cm

>
> I then pulled out two graphite rods 30cm long by .75cm diameter with a paper dielectric between the two rods. I registered 2mfarads
>

Alright, I got assistance to tightly squeeze the carbon graphite rods together and found a 8mfarads capacitance.

Now let me compare that 8mfarads of carbon rods with paper dielectric with 29mfarads for two sheets aluminum with paper dielectric.

Now I do not know why graphite paper registers 0 capacitance.

AP

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:02:50 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: iron and carbon Re: _Reporting data on Capacitor strength for
aluminum and carbon, 29mfarads and 8 mfarads
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:02:50 +0000

iron and carbon Re: _Reporting data on Capacitor strength for aluminum and carbon, 29mfarads and 8 mfarads

Alright so I have capacitance for Carbon, which is great as First Life was a capacitor. This first life could be either animal or plant, but likely to be plant so as to later tap into photosynthesis.

The carbon is important as a skin for the living creature. For the plant it would be the skin also as a body trunk or coating for algae. For animals we call it skin, for plants call it coating.

Now, there must be metal involved and I think it is iron.

If memory is correct, iron is essential for both plant and animal.

Now the dielectric, the insulator of First Life, I am going to assume is water, whether fresh water or salt water.

AP

On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 4:54:44 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Holy smokes my potted plants peat-moss has 2.55 mfarads Re: 8th edition of Atom Totality soon to come

Since i have the multimeter out i looked to see if my plants in potted peat moss had capacitance. It has 2.55 microfarads.

Important for my First Life = capacitor theory

However peat moss comes from established life.

Now if i can get capacitance from nonlife dirt or nonlife soil we open up a huge vista of environment where life began. And it would imply first life began on land not water.

AP

On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 5:19:30 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Re: Holy smokes my potted plants peat has 2.55 mfarads Re: 8th edition of Atom Totality soon to come

- show quoted text -
Alright, I went out today to measure capacitance in mud around the the house. Got 0 readings.

I remeasured my peatmoss in plastic container, water saturated with tomato plant growing. I read approx 10 microfarads.

So I wonder if carbon-- geologically can form into something similar to peat moss. I do not mean actual peat moss itself for that is a product of already living life. I want a carbon before any life appeared on Earth. I want a carbon with capacitance to be the First Life on Earth.

So, in mineralogy, does carbon ever become peat moss like in rocks?

AP

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 17:29:36 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Cosmic Background Voltage Re: my house background voltage as high as
..092 V Re: 8th edition of Atom Totality soon to come
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:29:36 +0000

Cosmic Background Voltage Re: my house background voltage as high as .092 V Re: 8th edition of Atom Totality soon to come

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:00:20 -0800 (PST)

Subject: page46, 10-1, advances in the theory of First Life as a battery and
capacitor; AP/Maxwell theory/ textbook, 8th ed.
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:00:20 +0000

page47, 7-1, advances in the theory of First Life as a battery and capacitor; AP/Maxwell theory/ textbook, 8th ed.

page46, 10-1, advances in the theory of First Life as a battery and capacitor; AP/Maxwell theory/ textbook, 8th ed.

Now I discovered this year in 2016 that First Life anywhere in the cosmos is either a battery or capacitor, which of the two is more primitive remains to be seen, and proven by experiments. I have the hunch the battery is more primitive for it is raw voltage, whilst the capacitor is a Standing Current.

Just today I was hoping to get some materials of carbon to test their capacitance, and to test how likely they would be in a battery.

There is news in Scientific American:

First Life as Capacitor;; recent article in Scientific American, DEC2016 suggests a different mechanism for EATING

Of course, up until today, I was suggesting the mechanism for eating of First Life, as more important feature of life than replication, and the form of eating was magnetism, where foreign objects get stuck to the Living Capacitor and where it thus increases in size, especially when it attracts smaller capacitors to stick inside the larger one.

But the trouble so far with that mechanism, is that I cannot get my capacitors to show signs of magnetism in any appreciable amount of magnetism.

But perhaps I should look to see if iron can be formed into a capacitor rather than aluminum metal.

But tonight I was reading the recent Scientific American DEC2016 on page 34 talks about "Carbon-Breathing Batteries" subtitled "Electrochemical cells could suck carbon out of the atmosphere and turn it into electricity". Further along it states "The battery's anode is made of metallic aluminum, which is cheap, abundant, and easy to work with. The cathode consists of porous carbon, which the researchers inject with a mixture of gaseous oxygen and carbon dioxide. Aluminum, oxygen and carbon dioxide react inside the battery to yield electricity and aluminum oxalate." Sadat/Archer Cornell Univ.

So, if my mechanism of Magnetism as the EATING for First Life does not pan out, then I should immediately switch to the above mechanism that eating is a chemical reaction of a Capacitor-Battery.

Now, I wonder if iron works just as well as aluminum for the carbon sequester battery. Further, I wonder if phosphorus can be found in air molecules so that when the phosphorus gets into the battery, it is transformed into nucleotide molecules of AT and CG.

Now a Capacitor is not a battery and vice versa, so I have a huge challenge of many experiments ahead.

I need to know how First Life used carbon. Was it carbon in minerals, in rocks.

Or, perhaps it was carbon dioxide in gas near water. Funny, how First Life may have been bubbles, and the bubbles eating other bubbles and growing.

Now I do not know if I can equip my lab to do bubble experiments.

AP

was first-life CO2 bubble molecules?

On Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 10:00:23 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
- show quoted text -
Now just last week, in the lab, I built a capacitor of aluminum and paper as dielectric and read up to 7 farads, depending on how much pressure applied (how close together). Reinforcing the idea of a Standing Current vice a Running Current.

But now I need to explore carbon as the conductor, instead of aluminum or other metals.

Now it could be that iron that is the conductor and started First Life with water as dielectric. We know iron is in all plants and animals.

But I like to toy with the idea that carbon was the first life conductor with water its dielectric. And in this toying around, I can envision the carbon making itself into a battery or capacitor.

But I am having extreme difficulty of finding sources of carbon as sheets or films, or iron as sheets or films to compose a battery or capacitor.

Now in modern times we can look at rocks and minerals for carbon content. Where is carbon found naturally in rocks and minerals, as graphite or graphene? Is it in volcano spew that we get concentrations of carbon deposits?

But the best idea seems to be gas molecules of carbon, the CO2 or the CO and then the water molecule as dielectric.

So envision bubbles of CO2 as a capacitor, or battery with bubbles inside of bubbles. Perhaps First Lifes first meal was a bubble eating a bubble.

And perhaps, not a long shot, but that Jupiter's red spot is a bubble sea of life formed from CO2 to evolve into red algae.

So, this idea of bubbles of CO2 forming a capacitor. Is it far fetched? How long can a bubble survive? And so the bubble of CO2 is easily formed to where the carbon is a sphere layer sandwiched in between by water, or oxygen. And when a CO2 bubble grows, it merely eats a smaller bubble, and the storing of a electric standing current in the bubble, gives it mobility along with giving it a magnetic attraction force to eat smaller bubbles.

Reproduction is not far behind, for I think nearly all of us saw the toy of a loop stuck into soap water produces a bevy of bubbles, as we can say that one bubble formed many offspring bubbles.

But this quest into bubbles hinges only on the fact that I am having a hard time of finding carbon in sheets in Nature. Now most readers do not comprehend a Earth without life, and so they are thinking, lumber is sheets of carbon, forgetting that life was not here when First Life was forming. So I think sheets of carbon are not found in Nature, unless life already exists. So I want sheets of carbon just as clays come in sheets.

So is there any clay formations that have carbon sheets? I do not know. And if there is none, I will come back to this bubble idea.

This bubble idea is extremely fascinating as a First Life mechanism, because it would say that life is intrinsic as a simple chemical reaction that goes along these lines:

n*CO2 + m*H2O ==> arrangements of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen forming a sac forming a capacitor or battery.

It would be like saying, the formation of life is no more miraculous than is the formation of a rock or mix of molecules.