Mitch_on_John Stillwell,John Baez math failures and cowards in admitting math truthes Terry Tao,Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales immoral in admitting slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. Is the 2nd derivative in Feynman's Electric field equation E = (-q/4*pi*e_0) [ (e_r)'/(r'^2) + (r'/c)(d/dt)(e_r'/r'^2) + (1/c^2)((d^2/dt^2)(e_r')] if that 2nd derivative is the same as C' in AP's EM equations?
> 5m views
> If the 2nd derivative in Feynman's Electric field equation E = (-q/4*pi*e_0) [ (e_r)'/(r'^2) + (r'/c)(d/dt)(e_r'/r'^2) + (1/c^2)((d^2/dt^2)(e_r')] if that 2nd derivative is the same as C' in AP's EM equations (modern day replacement of Maxwell Equations) E' = V'CB/(CB)^2 - VC'B/(CB)^2 - VCB'/(CB)^2 = V'/CB - VC'/C^2B - VB'/CB^2. Now in the Schrodinger equation we also run into a 2nd derivative but there are only 1st derivatives in AP's EM equations. So we have to ask if the C' is a 2nd derivative.

MitchR babbling on spam...
mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
mitchr...@gmail.com
variable speed of light
instead light has a constant speed that gravity does not slow down in space by escape velocity.
3:12 PM



> AP now thinks the second term - VC'B/(CB)^2 is the Schrodinger Equation in EM theory, would you agree?
>
> MitchR why waste your time, for Andrew Wiles, John Stillwell, Terence Tao are so retarded in mathematics, they cannot even admit slant cut of cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. And to press them with a question in calculus when they fail simple geometry--- why bother???
>
> CHEM ONE authors gives us a clue in their Schrodinger formula of E_n = - (2*pi^2*m*Z^2*e^4) / (n^2*h^2* alpha^2) with a footnote: alpha = 1.113*10^-10 C^2J^-1 m^-1 which is Coulomb force.
>
>
> Kibo failure of math, yet he spams and stalks 30 years nonstop
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
> Force of gravity = G*(m_1*m_2)/ distance^2 (Newton's law by 1687)
>
> Force of electrostatics = C(q_1*q_2)/ distance^2 (Coulomb law by 1785)
>
> So let us state the Coulomb-gravity law of Physics. From one of the permutations of V= CBE we have E = (V/(CB)) and when we differentiate that by the calculus we have E' = (V/(CB))'. Now we use the quotient rule of calculus, which is (f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/(gh)^2 and as we reduce that we get 3 terms of f'/gh -fg'/g^2h - fh'/gh^2. And using the quotient rule renders (V/(CB))' as that of V'/CB - VC'/C^2B - VB'/CB^2.
>
> E' = (V/(CB))' = V'CB/(CB)^2 - VC'B/(CB)^2 - VCB'/(CB)^2 = V'/CB - VC'/C^2B - VB'/CB^2.
>
> Harry, which term looks like the CHEM ONE equation--E_n = - (2*pi^2*m*Z^2*e^4) / (n^2*h^2* alpha^2)
>
>
>
> So our Coulomb-gravity law has 3 terms and we can break down each of those 3 terms into statements.
>
>
> So which of the AP-EM Equations is the Schrodinger Equation as given by CHEM ONE.
> > And I easily flip open some pages in CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, 1980 Waser, Trueblood, Knobler to page 311 for a sample of the Schrodinger equation as given by E_n = - (2*pi^2*m*Z^2*e^4) / (n^2*h^2* alpha^2).
> >
> > This is the question before me. Which term in which equation of the AP-EM laws is the Schrodinger Equation?
> >
> >
> >
> > Those 6 laws are these.
> >
> > 1) Magnetic monopole telling us what magnetism and electric current and magnetic field and electric field are.
> >
> > 2) New Ohm's law Voltage = capacitor-battery = quantity of current C times magnetic field times electric field. V= CBE. The equation of New Ohm's law is a math equation of volume Volume = length x width x height so we can expect that New Ohm's law is a measuring of volume in physics, volume of energy.
> >
> > The next 4 laws are derivatives of all the possible 4 permutations of C, B, E, and V.
> >
> > 3) Rate of change of C, quantity current, C' = (V/(BE))' Faraday law.
> >
> > 4) Rate of change of B, magnetic field, B' = (V/(CE))' Ampere-Maxwell law.
> >
> > 5) Rate of change of E, electric field, E' = (V/(CB))' Coulomb law & gravity.
> >
> > 6) The rate of change of V= CBE as V' = (CBE)' as AC transformer law.
> >
> > C' = (V/(BE))' = V'BE/(BE)^2 - VB'E/(BE)^2 - VBE'/(BE)^2 which is Faraday's law.
> > 1st term as current production -- 2nd term as Lenz law -- 3rd term as DC, AC direction
> >
> > B' = (V/(CE))' = V'CE/(CE)^2 - VC'E/(CE)^2 - VCE')/(CE)^2 which is Ampere-Maxwell law.
> > 1st term as B production -- 2nd term as Displacement current -- 3rd term as parallel attract
> >
> > E' = (V/(CB))' = V'CB/(CB)^2 - VC'B/(CB)^2 - VCB'/(CB)^2 which is Coulomb-gravity law.
> > 1st term as E production -- 2nd term as inverse square of distance -- 3rd term as spin and orbit synchronicity
> >
> > V' = (CBE)' = C'BE + CB'E + CBE' which is Transformer law
> > 1st term as V production in a transformer -- 2nd term as inverse square root -- 3rd term as DC, AC synchronicity
> >
> >
> > Review all of this, the EM equations of physics and mathematics.
> >
> > Faraday Law is (V/(B*L))' = i' from the AP-Maxwell Equations you learned in 1st year College.
> >
> > 1) Magnetic primal unit law Magnetic Field B = kg /A*s^2
> > 2) V = i*B*L New Ohm's law, law of electricity
> > 3) V' = (i*B*L)' Capacitor Law of Physics
> > 4) (V/i*L)' = B' Ampere-Maxwell law
> > 5) (V/(B*L))' = i' Faraday law
> > 6) (V/(i*B))' = L' the new law of Coulomb force with EM gravity force
> >
> >
> > PHYSICS LAWS
> >
> > 1) all the facts of chemistry and physics
> > 2) Voltage V = kg*m^2/A*s^3
> > 3) Current i = A = magnetic monopoles
> > 4) Magnetic primal unit law Magnetic Field B = kg /A*s^2
> > 5) angular momentum L = m^2/(A*s)
> > 6) V = i*B*L New Ohm's law, law of electricity
> > 7) V' = (i*B*L)' Capacitor Law of Physics
> > 8) (V/i*L)' = B' Ampere-Maxwell law
> > 9) (V/(B*L))' = i' Faraday law
> > 10) (V/(i*B))' = L' the new law of Coulomb force with EM gravity force
> >
> >
> >
> > Algebra of 3D Calculus, for remember we did the algebra of
> >
> > V' = (iBL)'
> > i' = (V/BL)'
> > B' = (V/iL)'
> > L' = (V/iB)'
> >
> > --- quoting 1st year calculus from Teaching True ---
> > Using the Product Rule which is (fgh)' = (f'gh + fg'h + fgh')
> >
> > Capacitor Law (i*B*L)' = i'*B*L + i*B'L + i*B*L'
> >
> > V' = (iBL)' = i'*B*L + i*B'*L + i*B*L' here we have three terms explaining capacitors
> >
> > Ampere-Maxwell Law
> >
> > Using the Quotient Rule, which is (f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/(gh)^2
> >
> > (V/i*L)' = B' = (V'*i*L - V*i' *L - V*i*L') / (i*L)^2
> >
> > Maxwell had two terms in the Ampere-Maxwell law-- the produced magnetic field and a displacement current, but above we see we have also a third new term.
> >
> > Faraday Law
> >
> > (V/B*L)' = i' = (V'*B*L - V*B' *L - V*B*L') / (B*L)^2
> >
> > ------------
> > V' = (iBL)' = i'*B*L + i*B'*L + i*B*L' reduces to
> > = iBL + iVL + iBL'
> >
> > i' = V'*B*L/ (B*L)^2 - V*B' *L/ (B*L)^2 - V*B*L' / (B*L)^2 reduces to
> > i' = B^2*L/ (B*L)^2 - V^2 *L/ (B*L)^2 - V*B*L' / (B*L)^2 further reduces
> > = 1/L - V^2/B^2*L - VL'/BL^2
> >
> > B' = V'*i*L/ (i*L)^2 - V*i' *L/ (i*L)^2 - V*i*L' / (i*L)^2 reduces to
> > B' = B*i*L/ (i*L)^2 - V*i *L/ (i*L)^2 - V*i*L' / (i*L)^2 further reduces to
> > = B/iL - V/iL - VL'/iL^2
> >
> >
> > L' = (V/i*B)' = (V'*i*B - V*i' *B - V*i*B') / (i*B)^2 reduces to
> > L' = i*B^2 / (i*B)^2 - V*i *B / (i*B)^2 - V^2*i / (i*B)^2 further reduces to
> > = 1/i - V/iB - V^2/iB^2
> >
> > --------
> >
> >
> > (1) V' = iBL + iVL + iBL'
> >
> > (2) i' = 1/L - V^2/B^2*L - VL'/BL^2
> >
> > (3) B' = B/iL - V/iL - VL'/iL^2
> >
> > (4) L' = 1/i - V/iB - V^2/iB^2
> >
> > Alright, so I replace L' in (1) with 1/i - V/iB - V^2/iB^2
> >
> > I get V' = iBL + iVL + iB*(1/i - V/iB - V^2/iB^2 )
> > = iBL + iVL + B - V - V^2/ B
> >
> >
> > Doing the replacement in (2)
> >
> > i' = 1/L - V^2/B^2*L - VL'/BL^2
> > = 1/L - V^2/B^2*L - V*(1/i - V/iB - V^2/iB^2) /BL^2
> > = 1/L - V^2/B^2*L - (V/iBL^2) - (V^2/iB^2L^2) - (V^3/(iB^3L^2))
> >
> > Doing the replacement in (3)
> >
> > B' = B/iL - V/iL - VL'/iL^2
> > = B/iL - V/iL - V(1/i - V/iB - V^2/iB^2)/iL^2
> > = B/iL - V/iL - (V/i^2L^2) - (V^2/i^2*B*L^2) - (V^3/( i^2B^2L^2))
> >
> > Is there any geometrical significance I can ascribe to this? There are some cubes involved.
> >
> > > > > Whereas the truth be known the real electron of a hydrogen atom is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus of 8 rings, where the muon and proton are doing the Faraday Law of producing more new electricity and storaging that electricity in what are known as neutrons. Because the muon is inside the proton it can fly around the torus inside at nearly the speed of light.
> > > > >
> > > > > Old Physics which Harry Cliff as a member, never took Logic, never learned how to think straight, think clear, and thus his physics knowledge is just hand down memorization. So stupid he never understood what the hell is angular momentum for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5MeV particle flying around at 99% speed of light and stay put on a proton of 938MeV.
> > > > >
> > > > > AP says the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. Now Dirac was a real physicist, but not Harry Cliff and everyone at CERN with their electron = 0.5MeV are fools of physics
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium
> AP
> 
> My_11th published book
>
> World's_First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> 
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis".. And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
>
> To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)