Wait, there's more!

" Dear Mr.Brunmauer: You have asked me yesterday to submit to you in
writing my proposition to bring about a position of the torpedo
parallel to the wall of the ship, before the explosion. In working this
out,however,I became aware that the realization of this method is quite
impossible. It is impossible,namely, to bring the torpedo to rest in
working on it on such a short length which is available; the forces are
so tremendous that they must mechanically destroy the torpedo. If v
is the speed of a torpedo of the mass m,the negative accelerating force
K, the way of accelerationA, then K is given by the equation , mpur=
Ra If one puts f.instance m=100 kg. =10°% vs 25m = 255 -10°cm sek
sek 4=10 cm one gets E-adeh sueoiute units or 300 weight tons
(3+10°Kg.). It is clear that the structure of the torpedo cannot stand
this. The torpedo has therefore to be brought to explosion pefore
loosing its spneed. In 0,001 second it makes a way of 2,5 cme To be
sure the explosion should be finished before suneunkxrakxparxs
essential parts of the torpedo findergo deformation. It can f.i. be
arranged that the head of the torpedo can undergo a deformation of
appr. 10 om, without the rest of the torpedo being mechanically
deformed. This frontal part should contain empty space ( or a space
containing only air) to avoid that its deformation produces a
compression wave propagating backwards with great speed, The torpedo-
head would then look like this The empty space has the only
purpose to gain a few thousands of a second between the time of contact
with the ship's wall in which the fuse-mechanism comes into function
and the time in which the explosion is finished. " - Albert Einstein

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312
>
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9_qfAqVUAEEnuH?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
>
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
>
> photo/2
> photo/3
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > "According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you
> > were visiting me
> > it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to
> > explosion
> > a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
> > would like to submit to you for your judgement.
> > S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magbetic field with
> > vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
> > serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to S.
> > The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied by
> > tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment when
> > the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
> > influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
> > vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
> > enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
> > When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through the
> > nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
> > magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There is
> > now created a current i the intensity of which will change according to
> > the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
> > the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
> > again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
> > explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
> > contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and goes
> > again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
> >
> > (to be continued in whole with original full document enclosed for
> > examination)
> >
> > (of course there are other bombs..)
> >
> > Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
> > (from the comfort of his home of course)
> > (remote work bombing???)
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > "According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you were visiting me
> > > it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to explosion
> > > a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I would like to submit to you for your judgement." -Albert Einstein
> > >
> > > (to be continued in whole)
> > >
> > > anyway...
> > > 'on the electrodynamics of moving bodies' sounds likes the theory of bombs to me.
> > >
> > > and his second paper:
> > > "does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content" sounds like the theory of atomic bombs!
> > >
> > > In other words, The Theory of Relativity is actually...The Theory of ATOMIC BOMBS!
> > >
> > > In 1905 Albert Einstein was thinking..."How can I make an atomic bomb?"
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany
> > > > > > could gain an absolute advantage
> > > > > > He didn't want anymore involvement
> > > > > > beyond his one letter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
> > > > > notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in March.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then after all the bombs were dropped and America celebrated..
> > > > >
> > > > > Albert Einstein went on to design NEW bombs that would explode and kill more people.
> > > > >
> > > > > The man was de bomb!
> > > > >
> > > > > "Woe is me!"
> > > >
> > > > ENCLOSURE TO MR. ALBERT EINSTEIN'S LETTER OF
> > > > MARCH 25, 1945 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
> > > > by
> > > > L. Szilard
> > > >
> > > > The work on uranium has now reached a stage which will make it
> > > > possible for the Army to detonate atomic bombs in the immediate future.
> > > > The "demonstration" of such bombs may be expected rather soon and naturally
> > > > the War Department is considering the use of such bombs in the war against
> > > > Japan.
> > > >
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9xHzihVcAUIWHO?format=jpg&name=medium
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1
> > > >
> > > > Don't yous guys want to see the NEW BOMB that Albert Einstein went on to design that would explode and kill more people?
> > > >
> > > > it's yummy!
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
> > > >
> > > > (from the comfort of his home of course)
> > > >
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E8yGl_HVUAQcmo4?format=jpg&name=900x900
> > > >
> > > > Einstein was soooooooo sad about Japan, ...he wanted to kill Germans instead.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.