On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 2:51:23 AM UTC-5, Andre Jute wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 11:23:05 AM UTC, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 8:03:10 PM UTC-5, Andre Jute wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:41:22 AM UTC, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 7:24:15 PM UTC-5, Andre Jute wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:16:08 PM UTC, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 5:52:38 PM UTC-5, Andre Jute wrote:
> > > > > > > On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 10:19:29 PM UTC, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 4:31:22 PM UTC-5, pH wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 2022-11-21, Andre Jute <fiul...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I've been saying this since I was a precocious teenager with a a column in the largest newspaper in the country, over 60 years ago.. It's more than a decade since, since right here on RBT, I explained why environmentalism is the religion of genocidal maniacs whose brains, if they ever had any, have been eaten by moral syphilis. Paul Driessen does an excellent jon of listing so many cockamamie policies pushed by these mindless clowns that it reads like parody, something found on a library shelf next to Dean Swift's Gulliver's Travels.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > COP-27 Financiers and Merchants Of Death
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://townhall.com/columnists/pauldriessen/2022/11/21/cop-27-financiers-and-merchants-of-death-n2616185
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Enjoy!*
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Andre Jute
> > > > > > > > > > *For the mental and morally stunted, that's sarcasm.
> > > > > > > > > Tried to open this and got a "link not found" message. Ah well.
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the attempt to share info.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Pureheart in Aptos, CA
> > > > > > > > All you missed was more right-wing disinformation. IOW, nothing new.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Really? Provide evidence to counter a single point Mr Driessen made.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You see, stupid- if the policies of the renewable energy hadn't been delayed by dullard Luddites like you, those mines would ave been closed down already, and these towns would be saved.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Nah, all I see among your slow-juvie debating tricks and ad hominem is "if..maybe...otherwise..." conditionals,
> > > > And of course you didn't read the link. So all we see is another useless bloviating asshole thinking he's clever, when he's just a useless bloviating asshole.
> > > > > all based on the proven-false assumption that sustainable energy works. What makes you look especially stupid is that you're assuming that the sustainable energy fallacy is valid
> > > > Considering I've never made any statement one way or the other - gee, andre building another strawman? That one's going to go over just as well as the Stieg Larsson hit job you ruined your Carrer with.
> > > > > within an example where the German government, and other governments who once believed in that foolish dream, have already admitted they fucked up -- and started digging for coal again, and putting up nuclear power stations.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Unsigned because I don't like stupid jerk-offs, and Flunky is an especially stupid jerk-off.
> > > > > >
> > > > > PS And didn't you tell us you were some kind of tester (at 60! Jesus -- what sort of a management didn't fire you at 35 for failing to advance?) of electrical equipment?
> > > > Nope. I never made that claim. That's you swallowing tommy's spunk once again. I''ve repeatedly stated what I do for a living, it's very clearly something neither you nor tommy (_especially_ tommy) have any capability of understanding. Suffice it to say - despite what your ignorant prejudices lead you to believe - Renewable energy isn't in my best interest.
> > > >
> > > > > If that is right
> > > >
> > > > Well it isn't, so once again you're just proving how much of a useless bloviating asshole you are.
> > > >
> > > > ,> you're also open to a charge of hypocrisy because any house-wiring electrician can tell you why sustainable power is technically a wet dream for stupid, obsessed people,
> > > >
> > > > Let me guess, these house-wiring electricians who supposedly think renewable energy isn't viable would be the same people who tommy says install "light lines" right?
> > > > > so you can't even claim ignorance as an excuse unless at the same time you confess to incompetence.
> > > > You're right, I can claim neither ignorance nor incompetence. You, otoh.....fucking unless
> > > >
> > > This is all ad hominem, denials without facts, and zero rational argument.
> > > It follows that you give no answers because you have none. Par for the course.
> > Hear now this, O foolish people, without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not - Jeremiah 5:21
> >
> > You were given to opportunity to read the argument, which you refused to do. Just for the record, that's called "willfull ignorance" you half-witted twat.
> > > The Left wants to shut up those of us with the brains to think for ourselves -- because they know they have no rational answers, just their twee "feelings", which they call "the science".
> > Of course we shouldn't be surprised that you have no understanding of what real science is - willfully or otherwise. The historical record of scientific achievements is lead overwhelmingly by progressives who ignored the religio-fascists and pressed on with free-thought. Idiots like you would like nothing better than to force the populace into a theocracy.
> > > That hoary old joke doesn't wash with me, sonny,
> > The only old joke here is you.
> > > and shouldn't wash even with an ignorant, semi-literate monkey like you either unless the vast empty space inside your head is full of the swirling mists of unfullfilled power-lust.. -- Unsigned
> > Get back to us on the subject of literacy when you can get published somewhere else besides an unmoderated internet forum, you useless old socialist hypocrite. Being in the oil and gas industry I understand better than anyone the technological possibilities of renewable energy. You're simply a troll with a decades-old misconception you desperately cling to because you know now you chose poorly. The sooner we're rid of old rusted anchors like you, the sooner we can get on with building a better life for future generations.
> >
> Still just bald assertions without the slightest attempt at providing any facts.

I've posted facts with quotes from individuals who directly refute your attempted challange. You refuse to read them, instead stooping to tommy's level and lying that the evidence wasn't posted. Contrast that with your "facts" - a rightwing op ed with no citations from a right wing website with a penchant for publishing that screeching cunt ann coulter. Your reading comprehension as bad as tommy's. His stupidity has not only rubbed off on you, it's left a permanent magatard tattoo that you've deluded yourself into thinking is a badge of honor.

> You're a shortass blusterer who hurts now because you thought (or was told by clowns who ran away long
> since when they set you on me without warning you that I'm Teflon or that I hit back) that I was an easy
> target, and you'll continue hurting until you implode or run away.

You'll squirrel away from this thread long before me you bloviating old fool. You always do. The fact that you slunk away from discussing the actual issue regarding the coal company vs the town like an embarrassed puppy that piddled on it's masters shoes is proof that you not only do not have an argument, you have no capacity to present one. Keep trying to hit me back with this "famous" kissinger debating style you keep bragging about. BTW - please let me know when you start.

> I don't care which; the day after it happens, I'll have to ask your name.

Still haven't figured out how to do your own homework.....I guess living off that socialist dole has left you rather intellectually impotent.

> I do adversarial polemics for a rich living

no, you don't. You're a former writer who retired embarrassingly after failing to produce anything more worthy that than toilet paper slogans for two decades, choosing to live somewhere that the taxpayers can support you. If you had done anything more than very poorly written [lack of] suspense novels since the millennium you would have incessantly bragged about it. You can post here because this is the only place you won't get booted off the forum.

> and you're a squiggly worm on my hook when I go fishing for fools. -- Andre Jute

dealing with you like fishing with dynamite. Slink back into your socialist hidey-hole, hypocrite.