Dan says, do not be a victim of anti-science Justin Trudeau and Linda Hasenfratz and Rose M. Patten with their 2 OR 1=3 with AND as subtraction for Justin et al love teaching dogma that is never corrected of mistakes.
On Saturday, August 28, 2021 at 9:13:07 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of

Question Dan, is it Dunning-Kruger disease that plagues John Baez, for he knows a cone has 1 axis of symmetry and the oval has one axis of symmetry, so Dan, why cannot the fool, silly fool of John Baez ever admit you cannot get a symmetry of 2 axes out of a cone of 1 axis of symmetry. Is it that John has breathed so much air pollution in California and become dumbnified that it is hard for John to even remember his name let alone mathematics. What say you Dan Christensen the Canadian insane stalker?

AP> Does John Baez and Jill Pipher and Ken Ribet suffer from Dunning-Kruger disease of psychology-- where they overestimate their abilities in math-- knowing the cone has 1 axis of symmetry, yet John, Jill & Ken still thinks 1 axis can yield a ellipse of 2 axes of symmetry in a slant cut. I think John, Jill & Ken are smarter than Dan Christensen with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, or, Kibo Parry M with his 938 is 12% short of 945, but not much smarter than Kibo Parry for both believe the slant cut in cone is a ellipse, when the truth be known, it is a Oval for the oval, like the cone has 1 axis of symmetry.
>
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Aug 27, 2021, 11:07:58 AM
> to sci.math
>
> Tao fails geometry because he believes Python with his cone has 2 axes of symmetry and hence slant cut is ellipse in cone, for otherwise, he would have said something by now 2016-2021.
> On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 10:35:31 AM UTC-5, Python wrote:
> > Why don't you buy this kind of stuff that will show you that
> > you didn't do the experiment right?
> >
> > https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/595178906992508262/
> >
> > Moreover that a slant cut in a cylinder shows an ellipse does not
> > contradict that some slant cuts in a cone shows an ellipse also.
>
> AP writes: no wonder that AP's discovery that Cone slant cut is an Oval never the ellipse is because everyone in math community other than AP thinks a cone has 2 axes of symmetry, just the same as a cylinder has 2 axis of symmetry.
>
> I have heard of color blindness where you fail to see certain wavelengths of color, and guess that in mathematics, now, we have to test students and teachers for axis blindness.
>
>
> Python wrote:
> Aug 27, 2021, 11:14:47 AM
> to sci.math
> Ludwig Poehlmann, aka Archimedes Plutonium a écrit :
> >
> > Tao fails geometry because he believes Python with his cone has 2 axes of symmetry and hence slant cut is ellipse in cone
>
> A cone has ONE axe of symmetry AND a slant cut in a cone IS an ellipse.
>
> You can buy a wood model for a few bucks, Ludwig, instead of making a
> fool of yourself.
>
> Python wrote:
> Aug 27, 2021, 11:41:04 AM
> to sci.math
> Ludwig Poehlmann, aka Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 11:14:47 AM UTC-5, Python wrote:
> >> Ludwig Poehlmann, aka Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Tao fails geometry because he believes Python with his cone has 2 axes of symmetry and hence slant cut is ellipse in cone
> >> A cone has ONE axe of symmetry AND a slant cut in a cone IS an ellipse..
> >>
> Python>> You can buy a wood model for a few bucks, Ludwig, instead of making a
> Python>> fool of yourself.
> >
> AP> a ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry, so how do you get a figure with 2
> AP> axes of symmetry from a cone of 1 axis of symmetry
>
> Python>watch it there:
> Python>https://www.youtube.com
>
> AP writes: Does Terence Tao, Jill Pipher & Ken Ribet and Python (possibly Terry Tao in disguise) have Dunning-Kruger effect disability? Wikipedia describes it as "internal illusion in people of low ability". In this case mathematics, that Terry Tao has low ability in math and so misperceives the Cone as 1 axes of symmetry and then deludes himself that a 2 axes of symmetry can be gotten with a slant cut in cone to yield ellipse. Whereas AP was always a straight and narrow on cue scientist, knowing that the cone of 1 axes could never yield a ellipse of 2 axes , no, for AP that slant cut could only yield another figure of 1 axes of symmetry-- the Oval.
>
> The follies and blunders of Dan Christensen, the mighty Canadian oaf of logic and math. Of course his most insane and twisted offering is his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, believing in Boole logic even when Boole screwed up royally in his AND connector truth table of TFFF when in reality it is TTTF, making a mockery of the Either..Or..Or..Both that is a insane self contradiction, yet all logicians of today and past still preach this error ridden nonsense of logic. But Dan is caught often with his mindless pronouncements in sci.math, such as these two incidents.
>
> Here is an example of Dan Christensen fumbling with the most simple of logic reasoning, and yet Canada keeps allowing this misfit to dig deeper into logic.
> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote:
> > Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > >>>> PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.
> > >>>
> > >>> The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> What a monsterous fool you are
> > >>
> > >
> > > OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.
> >
> > And yet Mr Plutonium is right. Two points are distinct (else they would
> > be one) and it is not necessary to say so.
> >
> Apparently Dan Christensen never took calculus or flunked it with this statement.
> On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 8:57:54 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 2:32:51 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > The nonexistence of a curved angle because there is no way to measure the angle if either one of the rays is not a straightline segment at the vertex,
> >
> > From the derivative of each curve at the point of contact you have the slopes of their respective tangents there. (Assuming derivatives are defined there.) From these slopes, you should be able to calculate angle formed.
> >
> >
> > Dan
>
>
>
> It has been known by AP that another clear case example of Dunning Kruger disease and mental disorder is the stalker Kibo Parry M. where he posts every day of the year almost for 28 years to sci.math when that insane koot cannot even do a percentage with his 938 is 12% short of 945.
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> And his continued stalk spam of a another posters mindless talk of some notes he took, a garbled nonsense mess--
> kibo>Here is a plane and cone
> x + 1 = z
> and
> 2*x^2 + 2*y^2 = z^2
> >
> kibo>Square the first equation giving us
> x^2 + 2*x + 1 = z^2
> >
> kibo>In the second equation replace z^2 with x^2 + 2*x + 1 giving us
> 2*x^2 + 2*y^2 = x^2 + 2*x + 1
> >
> kibo>Subtract x^2 + 2*x - 1 from both sides giving us
> x^2 - 2*x + 1 + 2*y^2 = 2
> >
> kibo>Replace x^2 - 2*x + 1 with (x-1)^2 giving us
> (x-1)^2 + 2*y^2 = 2
> >
> kibo>That is EXACTLY the equation of an ellipse
> And there are two planes of symmetry.
> >
> kibo>No matter how you tilt or rotate an ellipse it
> REMAINS an ellipse and has TWO PLANES of symmetry,
> just like the intersection of a plane and cylinder
> remains an ellipse no matter what the slope of the
> plane is.
> >
>
> AP writes: 7 years of stalker shithead Dan Christensen and 28 years of a shithead Kibo Parry M, unloading a wade of crap in every AP thread that AP was doing solid math and physics, such as the above, and no-one kicks the insane stalker Kibo Parry M out of sci.math and sci.physics.
>
> AP writes: well in the opinion of AP, that Kibo Parry M has more to worry about than Dunning Kruger disease of his mental health, because in the opinion of AP, that Kibo Parry is a insane person, all stalkers are insane people and as a stalker, not even a human being, no longer a human being but melting away in insanity. For 28 years now, the insane arsewipe Kibo Parry M.. has made no contribution to sci.math but to hate spew everyone he stalks. Get the straightjacket in emergency ambulance for Kibo Parry M size XXSmall.
>
> So, well is the world being Dumbnificated by the fossil fuel burning discharging tonnes and tonnes of toxic chemicals into the air every minute of the day, and that CO2 itself comes in several isomers where the Fire-CO2, not the Animal-CO2 isomer (see my chemistry books) is especially harmful to Humans thinking abilities especially logical thinking. So that John Baez, Terence Tao and Jill Pipher and Ken Ribet could no longer reason, reason that if a cone has 1 axis of symmetry, no way in hell is a slant cut into a 1 axis symmetry cone going to yield a 2 axes symmetry ellipse. No way in hell, but the cut will release a 1 axis symmetry Oval.
>
> AP
> King of Science, especially Physics