It appears to me that the mad scientists took
their info to the ...'Art Dept.' and told them,
"Gimme a Black Hole without looking like it was retouch
in Photoshop!"

And the 'art dept' genius blurred it so that
it appears to be a black hole in the center.

Actually, THEY BLURRED EVERYTHING!!!!

Then they took it back to the
mad scientists and he said...
"WHAT THE FUCK IS DAT????"

and the girl sez, "That's your black hole."

and the mad scientists sez to her..

"IT LOOK LIKE YOUR FUCKING ASS YOU UGLY FUCKIN BITCH!!!!"

of course she runs out of the room crying...

(watch how real women scientists are treated in the scientific community)

https://www.netflix.com/title/81303549

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Now, here is the First black hole photo they showed last year:
>
> the blurry one
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/1
>
> and my sharpen version one
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/2
>
> Are they going to repeat the same process over and over again for the rest of the billion black holes out there???
>
> I like my sharpen version better:
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/2
>
> only problem is, there is no black hole...
>
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/3
>
> they are just waves like an ocean wave...
>
> waddayoucallit, gravitional waves?
>
> space is wet
> but
> you're
> like a fish
> you don't feel
> the wet.
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Here is a video from sharp back to blurry
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1525273775251419136
> >
> > https://youtu.be/0a7etYMLqPs
> >
> > i guess they are trying to hide the stuff that is inside a black hole...
> >
> > but i'm in the mood for a jelly doughnut!
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Now, all you have to do is take this 'sharpen' photo of the blurry black
> > > hole
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1524978633311256577/photo/1
> > >
> > > and add around 160 percent blur (Gaussian Blur) and it looks the new
> > > fraudulent Black Hole photo in the news.
> > >
> > > There is a reason why men's vision gets blurry as they get older...it
> > > makes their wives look younger.
> > >
> > > all you see is a black hole.
> > >
> > > If you put a paper bag over you wife's head you need to put a hole in
> > > it.
> > >
> > > NASA needs a Black Hole.
> > >
> > > They remove the blue and green primary light colors..
> > >
> > > all you left with is red and black.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > They couldn't get it any more bluuryerrr?
> > > >
> > > > Here is the sharp version:
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1524978633311256577/photo/1
> > > >
> > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > FEEDING THE MIND OF PEOPLE WITH CRAP LIKE LIGO AND
> > > > > GRAVITATIONAL WAVES. This was announced today on Western media.
> > > > >
> > > > > *******************************************
> > > > > https://eventhorizontelescope.org/blog/astronomers-reveal-first-image-black-hole-heart-our-galaxy
> > > > >
> > > > > Astronomers have confirmed the supermassive object at the heart of the Milky Way galaxy is indeed a black hole and captured the first-ever images of it using a worldwide network of telescopes. The images were unveiled on Thursday at *********** multiple press conferences by a team of researchers *********** known as the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration.
> > > > >
> > > > > Known as Sagittarius A, the object at the center of the Milky Way – “invisible, compact and very massive,” as described in a press release published by the European Southern Observatory – was long suspected to be a black hole. However, the images created through linking up a global network of radio telescopes provide direct proof of this hypothesis.
> > > > >
> > > > > Main points of the "multiple press conferences":
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) The images show a dark central “shadow” surrounded by a bright ring made up of glowing gasses, the light they produce bent by the black hole’s powerful gravity. The object has four million times the mass of the Sun, and is located 27,000 light years away from our planet.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) Gases are orbiting the black hole at near the speed of light. EHT scientist Chi-kwan Chan likening the process to “trying to take a clear picture of a puppy quickly chasing its tail.”
> > > > >
> > > > > 3) The visuals were recorded by linking together eight radio observatories around the world to form what the researchers described as “a single ‘Earth-sized’ virtual telescope,” which was then used to observe Sagittarius A for hours at a time on multiple nights in 2017.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4) Powerful supercomputers and a team of more than 300 researchers from 80 institutes, previously imaged the black hole M87 at the center of the distant Messier 87 galaxy, publishing those findings in 2019. Sagittarius A is much closer, as well as over 1,000 times smaller and less massive. However, it was significantly more difficult to photograph, as it was equivalent to take a picture of a donut on the surface of the Moon from Earth.
> > > > >
> > > > > 5) Actually, due that gases rotates around the black hole several times per
> > > > > minute, a composite picture, averaged in time, was required plus the
> > > > > corrections due to comparisons with the solutions of general relativity
> > > > > equations, until a satisfactory picture was obtained. The blurred image is
> > > > > due to the multiple averages, result of heavy post-processing in the last
> > > > > five years.
> > > > >
> > > > > 6) Accompanying the photographic findings were six papers published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters covering various aspects of the discovery, from the imaging process to the morphology of black holes.
> > > > >
> > > > > 7) The main image was produced by averaging together thousands of images created using different computational methods — all of which accurately fit the EHT data. This averaged image retains features more commonly seen in the varied images, and suppresses features that appear infrequently.
> > > > >
> > > > > The images can also be clustered into four groups based on similar features. An averaged, representative image for each of the four clusters is shown in the bottom row. Three of the clusters show a ring structure but, with differently distributed brightness around the ring. The fourth cluster contains images that also fit the data but do not appear ring-like.
> > > > >
> > > > > Institutional Press Releases (in alphabetical order)
> > > > >
> > > > > European Southern Observatory
> > > > > Institute of Advanced Studies
> > > > > Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie
> > > > > National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > National Science Foundation
> > > > >
> > > > > ******************************************
> > > > > DISCLAIMER:
> > > > >
> > > > > The uber-doctore photograph IS NOT about OPTICAL wavelengths, but
> > > > > RADIO wavelengths, in the microwave region. So, IT'S NOT REAL!
> > > > >
> > > > > The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), an array which linked together eight existing RADIO observatories across the planet to form a single “Earth-sized” VIRTUAL telescope. The telescope is named after the “event horizon”, the boundary of the black hole beyond which no light can escape.
> > > > >
> > > > > The collected data, around 2017, was post-processed during 5 YEARS until
> > > > > the result MATCHED the database of possible solutions of general relativity.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is EXACTLY the same process used around LIGO for detecting gravitational
> > > > > waves. Any signal was compared with hundred of thousand of patterns
> > > > > stored in supercomputers, which are the result of different solutions of
> > > > > the equations of GR.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, go and believe whatever you want. But you was warned about this crap.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.