5-Olcott,Cambridge Sainsbury, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes,Ahnert,Alai as spam mill insane as Olcott with his 938MeV proton, his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and his ellipse a conic when it is a oval, and never a geometry proof of fundamental theorem of calculus. Olcott spams sci.math everyday for decades and does it only because he likes to piss people off, for Olcott is a failure of science

Why Cambridge England encourages crazy insane spam of Olcott. Harry Cliff, any answers on that???? And is that why you think the electron of atoms is 0.5MeV when it is the muon.
olcott, olcott 47
unread,
Refuting the Peter Linz Halting Problem Proof V6
On 3/30/2022 9:59 PM, Dennis Bush wrote: > On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 10:52:11 PM UTC-4,
> > > >
> 4 > > Is everyone at Cambridge a blind logical misfit with their Rutherford atom of 938MeV proton and electron at 0.5MeV and as insane as the spammer Olcott with his endless spam of HALTING.
> > > > Cambridge professors insane about Logic turns students like Pete Olcott insane also.
> > > > David Sainsbury Cambridge Univ
> > > > Cambridge Physics Dept
> > > >
> 5 > > Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.
> > > >
> > > > Cambridge Math Dept
> > > >
> > > > Alan Baker
> > > > Bela Bollobas
> > > > Darwin Smith
> > > > John Coates
> > > > Timothy Gowers
> > > > Peter Johnstone
> > > > Imre Leader
> > > > Gabriel Paternain
> > > > ..
> > > > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> > > > , . `.' ' `.
> > > > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> > > > . ; .' . `. ;
> > > > ; . ' `. . '
> > > > . ' ` `. |
> > > > . '. '
> > > > . 0 0 ' `.
> > > > ' `
> > > > ; `
> > > > .' `
> > > > ; U `
> > > > ; '; `
> > > > : | ;.. :` `
> > > > : `;. ```. .-; | '
> > > > '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> > > > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi I am Pete Olcott who failed logic and math and now is satisfied in spamming sci.math with loads of waste paper from the computer room. I love to pester people who do know logic and math, since I am a crank failure. Crank crank crank.
> > > > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> > > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > > ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> > > > ` . ' '
> > > > / ` `. ' ' .
> > > > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> > > > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> > > > / .'' ; ` .' `
> > > > ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> > > > "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> > > > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> > > > :' | ' ` , `. `
> > > > | ' ` ' `. `
> > > > ` ' ` ; `. |
> > > > `.' ` ; `-'
> > > > `...'
> > > > Can any-one at Cambridge start correcting the error filled Boole, Jevons, Russell, Whitehead, Godel, Wittgenstein, all failures of logic and logical reasoning, include Cantor and his tripe of undefined infinity, an infinity without a borderline between finite and infinite.
> > > >
> > > > Cambridge, you no longer are a premiere University but a school that fosters and shelters losers of logical reasoning.
> > > > Pete Olcott closing down Cambridge University because they teach hypocrisy of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 12:45:05 PM UTC-5, peteolcott wrote:
> > > > > this is bloody well not frigging spam.
> > > > Olcott loves to irritate people in science, for he must have failed science to spend this inordinate amount of time posting computer waste and pretending to talk about Logic.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Olcott can John Coates,David Sainsbury, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or is that totally foreign to them? Mind you, not a limit analysis hornswaggle for that is not geometry, limit analysis is not even a math proof for anyone can analysis things, analysis this post and only math hypocrites would think it is a proof.
> > > >
> > > > Re: Cambridge, you no longer are a premiere University but a school that fosters and shelters losers of logical reasoning. And why do you encourage crank screwballs that repeat computer trash, Pete Olcott, spamming sci.math everyday?
> > > >
> > > > > Olcott can Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, ever ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or does that thought fly way too above their heads?
> > > > >
> > > > > Copyright 2021 Pete Olcott
> > > > > Spammers hit targets no one else can hit;
> > > > > Crackpots hit a target no one else cares to see.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Olcott, why cannot Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle? Is it because they cannot even do logic correctly with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Olcott why does Cambridge Univ Stephen J. Toope, David Sainsbury, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain keep teaching Boole error filled logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and these crazies still think the slant cut in cone is a ellipse when in fact it is a Oval. Why brainwash and pollute more students like Pete Olcott who is crazy enough as it is.
> > > > 
> > > > > Cambridge failures of physics who cannot even ask the question which is the atom's true real electron-- the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Harry Cliff, AP requires that Harry Cliff LHCb physicist to publish in the Cambridge Univ student newspaper of how sorry he is and apologizes for his physics stupidity of thinking that a hydrogen atom is composed of a electron of 0.5MeV flying around outside of a proton of 938MeV, flying around at 99% speed of light and still holding up and holding together as a hydrogen atom. Such stupid physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Whereas the truth be known the real electron of a hydrogen atom is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus of 8 rings, where the muon and proton are doing the Faraday Law of producing more new electricity and storaging that electricity in what are known as neutrons. Because the muon is inside the proton it can fly around the torus inside at nearly the speed of light.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Old Physics which Harry Cliff is a member, never took Logic, never learned how to think straight, think clear, and thus his physics knowledge is just hand down memorization. So stupid he never understood what the hell is angular momentum for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5MeV particle flying around at 99% speed of light and stay put on a proton of 938MeV.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AP says the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. Now Dirac was a real physicist, but not Harry Cliff and everyone at CERN with their electron = 0.5MeV.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So, Harry Cliff, AP requires you to publish in Cambridge student newspaper your apology for the boneheaded physics you pursue and teach and test on fake physics of the atom.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics.. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1033 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > #3-1, 2nd published book