Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below) |
mail files register nodelist faq login |

Posted: 8 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Science Council Rules Earth: Zelensky is optimistic with peace talk, but AP knows of no insane person like Putin ever reforming, insane people only get worse. I wish I could be as optimistic as President Zelensky of Ukraine that a negotiat |

Posted: 33 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Do not tell me the PBS Newshour completely missed the passing of Vangelis? I searched and searched,no luck. Perhaps this Monday PBS is going to do a entire segment on Vangelis and needed the research for a belated news coverage. AP |

Posted: 41 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Terence Tao, why Jan, is it because Tao is such a imp of math that he runs and hides whenever asked to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for I bet Tao failed geometry also with his ellipse a conic section when that is |

Posted: 42 Minutes ago by: Timothy Golden This just is wrong. Allowing the ellipses the expression is correct and the 'remainder' is exactly zero. If anything is wrong with the expression it is out further. You are dividing two natural values and getting a continuous value. |

Posted: 44 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Ben Green, Roger Penrose, Thomas Hales, Brian Greene, Lisa Randall, Edward Witten, John Baez, Alan H. Guth, Michael E. Brown, Konstantin Batygin, Ben Bullock, Larry Harson, Mark Barton, far too stupid in physic |

Posted: 46 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse The Ramanujan Machine - Using algorithms to discover new mathematics http://ramanujanmachine.com #math https://twitter.com/algoritmic/status/1194556487802195968 |

Posted: 52 Minutes ago by: sergi o "step by step" implies you are at a step number, came from previous step, and have not gone to the next step. so you are stuck at k. it is just one line in the code and needs the outside loop to drive all the steps s=.9 for i = 1 to o |

Posted: 58 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Thomas Hales, Brian Greene, Lisa Randall, Edward Witten, John Baez, Alan H. Guth, Michael E. Brown, Konstantin Batygin, Ben Bullock, Larry Harson, Mark Barton, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true elect |

Posted: 1 Hour 18 Minutes ago by: Chris M. Thomasson True. Humm... I am wondering if this is kosher wrt the step-by-step process... If the index of the process is infinity, then it is equal to one. [infinity] = 1 because the limit is one for the process as a whole? Is that just, moronic? |

Posted: 1 Hour 37 Minutes ago by: Dan Christensen If only you understood how mathematical proofs actually work, Jan Burse. Save yourself all this embarrassment, learn some math and just admit you were wrong. Dan |

Posted: 1 Hour 42 Minutes ago by: Dan Christensen [snip] None are as desperate as you, Jan Burse. Learn some math and just admit you were wrong and save yourself all this embarrassment. Dan |

Posted: 1 Hour 57 Minutes ago by: Jim Burns .... of m/n:k/1 1/1:1/1 1/2:2/1 1/3:4/1 1/4:7/1 ... 2/1:3/1 2/2:5/1 2/3:8/1 2/4:12/1 ... 3/1:6/1 3/2:9/1 3/3:13/1 3/4:18/1 ... 4/1:10/1 4/2:14/1 4/3:19/1 4/4:25/1 ... 5/1:15/1 5/2:20/1 5/3:26/1 5/4:33/1 ... |

Posted: 2 Hours 3 Minutes ago by: Dell Ibi your country is a gas station mascaraed as a country. |

Posted: 2 Hours 40 Minutes ago by: Señor_Dingus Double-idiot. |

Posted: 2 Hours 43 Minutes ago by: sergi o just use base(0.333....) 0.333... base10 = 1 base(0.333....) problem solved |

Posted: 3 Hours 42 Minutes ago by: Fritz Feldhase namely: |

Posted: 3 Hours 44 Minutes ago by: Fritz Feldhase Ooops, I meant |

Posted: 3 Hours 53 Minutes ago by: Timothy Golden How about 1/3 = 0.333...3 There. Now it's finished. Numbers as two-sided entities have a familiarity that is lost with the one sided form. The critical interpretation that I have recently found is to regard this form with the decimal poi |

Posted: 4 Hours 1 Minute ago by: Jim Burns I describe a fraction m/n. That's the assumption: That the fractions we are talking about are as I describe them. _From that description_ I show that k/1 is a vanishing minority of those fractions. That part is NOT an assumption. For |

Posted: 4 Hours 5 Minutes ago by: Fritz Feldhase Look, dumbo, if this were true then the set {A} would have to be A, which is NOT the case. Hint: If A = {0, 1} then A has exactly two elements, namely 0 and 1. But {A} has only o n e element, namely A. Hint: forall x(x e {A} <-> x = A), |

Posted: 4 Hours 30 Minutes ago by: Timothy Golden Yes, well here I think that as you distinguish mathematical objects from philosophy you are implying the existence of some pure form with a mechanism that can be detailed which deserves attention. As to when such a thing becomes 'mathemat |

Posted: 4 Hours 31 Minutes ago by: FromTheRafters Okay, so what is a theorem then? |

Posted: 4 Hours 38 Minutes ago by: FromTheRafters The best non-fiction writers. |

Posted: 4 Hours 52 Minutes ago by: Gus Gassmann [Idiotic crap] Because you wrote it! You have no fucking clue. Hint: the card() function is not continuous. |

Posted: 5 Hours 7 Minutes ago by: Socratis T.n.p. 10/1i = 100i ==> 100i * 1i = 100i^2 = 1m^2 10/1i^2 = 1000i^2 ==> 1000i^2 = 10m^2 10/1i^3 = 10'000i^3 => 10'000i^3 = 10m^3- In practice, the calculator deduces that if I divide 10/1i^3 I'm dividing: 10m^3. = 10'000i^3- As you know .. th |

Posted: 5 Hours 27 Minutes ago by: Fritz Feldhase This sequence DOES NOT HAVE a limit, you silly idiot! Since all terms in this sequence are either 1 or -1, no term is > 10. WOW! An incredibe insight, Mückenheim! |

Posted: 5 Hours 34 Minutes ago by: Fritz Feldhase No reaction/answer? Ok. So let's consider the following: Indeed! There's a simple distribution of the X to achieve this goal: Well done, Mückenheim! |

Posted: 5 Hours 37 Minutes ago by: Fritz Feldhase Indeed! There's a simple distribution of the X to achieve this goal: No one knows. |

Posted: 5 Hours 39 Minutes ago by: William Piffle. The intersection of a sequence of sets, each of cardinality alpeh_0, can be empty. This is a simple result of the Axiom of Infinity, It is a result that you do not like, not a contradiction. |

Posted: 5 Hours 46 Minutes ago by: Fritz Feldhase Sure, consider the two proper classes ORD (the class of all ordinal numbers) and R (the Russell class). These two (proper) classes do not form a set. I.e. There's no set X such that Ax(x e X <-> x = ORD v x = R).*) You are dumb like shi |

Posted: 5 Hours 53 Minutes ago by: sergi o Wrong. An Axiom is a mathematical statement that is assumed to be true. you cannot even get the basics right |

Posted: 5 Hours 56 Minutes ago by: sergi o here is where you make your mistake It is wrong, your reasoning is flawed, and you know this. |

Posted: 5 Hours 59 Minutes ago by: sergi o sure here is a finite grouping of characters on one line; 1 2 3 a to make them a set in Math, I have to declare it as such and use the notation this is the set of 1,2,3,a {1,2,3,a} |

Posted: 7 Hours 4 Minutes ago by: WM The k do not cover the matrix but only one column at the start. During the infinite operation their share cannot grow . My judgement is rooted in the fact that an infinite sequence of +1, -1, +1, -1, +1, -1, ... can never, at no finite |

Posted: 7 Hours 14 Minutes ago by: WM Here you can learn what the k c an do: If the fractions m/n are enumerated by the natural numbers k according to Cantor's function k = (m + n - 1)(m + n - 2)/2 + m then all the fractions of the sequence 1/1, 1/2, 2/1, 1/3, 2/2, 3/1, 1/4, |

Posted: 7 Hours 17 Minutes ago by: WM Do you know an example of a finite collection which is not a set? REgards, WM |

Posted: 7 Hours 19 Minutes ago by: WM Meanwhile this proof does count for many: If the fractions m/n are enumerated by the natural numbers k according to Cantor's function k = (m + n - 1)(m + n - 2)/2 + m then all the fractions of the sequence 1/1, 1/2, 2/1, 1/3, 2/2, 3/1, |

Posted: 7 Hours 22 Minutes ago by: WM You know this because you would not accept a contradiction. Many people differ in that point, for example here: If the fractions m/n are enumerated by the natural numbers k according to Cantor's function k = (m + n - 1)(m + n - 2)/2 + m |

Posted: 7 Hours 26 Minutes ago by: WM Depends. A good axiom is a brief statement describing well-established fact.. Example: Group axioms. A bad axiom is arbitrary nonsense, often contradicting well-established fact. Example: Large cardinal axioms. Regards, WM |

Posted: 7 Hours 32 Minutes ago by: Moe Endoso Press TV in Mariupol: Ukraine blew up theater to blame it on Russia https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2022/05/19/682341/Ukraine-Russia-Mariupol |

Posted: 10 Hours 22 Minutes ago by: FromTheRafters It does doesn't it. Looks sort of like some alien biomechanical tech. |

Posted: 10 Hours 26 Minutes ago by: FromTheRafters It is the mistake of thinking that summation is a step by step process. Just because there are indices for each member does not mean you have to add them in any particular order. |

Posted: 11 Hours 23 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse /* law of excluded middle */ /* doesn't hold in intuitionistic logic */ A v ~A Dan-O-Matiks non-classical Even and Odd do have a lot of holes, one cannot prove the following: /* doesn't hold in Dan-O-Matiks D */ Odd(A) & Odd(B) => A+B = |

Posted: 11 Hours 57 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse We are waiting for a proof. If only your axioms would exactly capture n. But this is not what they do. You cannot prove from your nonsense axioms: ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Even(a) & Even(b) => Even(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n |

Posted: 12 Hours 2 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse No mathematician is this careless as you are. Trying to sell us your non-classical Even and Odd is a result of a fallacy. You think Peano => Basics does also imply Basics => Peano, thats why you use the name n, which is not justified. |

Posted: 12 Hours 13 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Even(a) & Even(b) => Even(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Even(a) & Odd(b) => Odd(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Odd(a) & Even(b) => Odd(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Odd(a) & Od |

Posted: 12 Hours 14 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Even(a) & Even(b) => Even(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Even(a) & Odd(b) => Odd(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Odd(a) & Even(b) => Odd(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Odd(a) & Od |

Posted: 12 Hours 14 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Even(a) & Even(b) => Even(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Even(a) & Odd(b) => Odd(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Odd(a) & Even(b) => Odd(a+b)]] ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [Odd(a) & Od |

Posted: 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium So far, found no counterexample to the claim, that the whole number 604 has a unique division of 604/23 = 26.260... and 604/26 = 23.230... Let me call it a Symmetry Number. And this is needed for physics of speed of light versus two Planck |

Posted: 15 Hours 18 Minutes ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Here is a 360 of the field: https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbids8470760645258 |

Posted: 16 Hours 9 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium I wanted to check and see if any 4 asteroids, a quadruple set of asteroids have been found that are gravitationally bound. Sure enough there is 130 Elektra. Sure enough, there is a large asteroid as one corner and 3 asteroid moons revolving |

Posted: 16 Hours 14 Minutes ago by: sergi o Sorry but you are wrong. Repeating decimal representation of a number proves it is a rational number, and you can solve for the rational fraction. |

Posted: 16 Hours 19 Minutes ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 16 Hours 19 Minutes ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 16 Hours 19 Minutes ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 16 Hours 19 Minutes ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 16 Hours 19 Minutes ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 17 Hours 8 Minutes ago by: Dan Christensen n is correctly described here as the set of natural numbers. Geez, yer dumb, Jan Burse! You really must learn some math! Should be: ALL(a):[a e n => [a < 0 => ~Odd(a)]] where n is the set of natural numbers. BTW it is vacuously tr |

Posted: 17 Hours 20 Minutes ago by: Dan Christensen Wrong again, Troll Boy. It is correctly stated as: ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => a+b e n] where n = the set of natural numbers. Not required in the proof. Geez yer dumb. Learn some math. Likewise, not required, idiot! Wrong agai |

Posted: 17 Hours 28 Minutes ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I wonder if he thinks "becoming" just might be: [0] = 0 [1] = .9 [2] = .99 [3] = .999 [4] = .9999 [5] = .99999 |

Posted: 17 Hours 29 Minutes ago by: Dan Christensen Wrong again, Jan Burse. It is correctly stated as: ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => a+b e n] where n = the set of natural numbers Wrong again, Jan Burse. It is correctly stated as: ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => a+b=b+a] When will |

Posted: 17 Hours 37 Minutes ago by: Dan Christensen It was correctly stated as: ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => a+b e n] where n = the set of natural numbers Deal with it, Jan Burse. Wrong again, Jan Burse. It is corrected stated as: ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => a+b=b+a] When w |

Posted: 17 Hours 39 Minutes ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Thanks! This is rendered as an equirectangular. It is almost ready to create a 360 image out of it. |

Posted: 17 Hours 49 Minutes ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Wow! That is a very humbling comparison. Thank you so much! wow again. |

Posted: 18 Hours 12 Minutes ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Here is another one: https://fractalforums.org/gallery/1612-220522022650.png |

Posted: 18 Hours 17 Minutes ago by: Socratis T.n.p. Which is it Socratis?? You spammer crank. Told by Archimedes ... who writes 130 books ... without knowing T.d.i. Logic ... it's a compliment - :)) 0.1 *2 *10 = 2m^3 ==> 1i *20i *100i = 2000i^3. 0.2 *2 *10 = 4m^3 ==> 2i *20i *100i = 4'0 |

Posted: 18 Hours 37 Minutes ago by: FromTheRafters That number being represented by this symbol is not 'becoming' anything though. It simply is a representation of a number (the natural number one in this case) as embedded in the real number system. |

Posted: 18 Hours 41 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Is Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan, John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, Jim Holt, more of propagandists like Dan Christensen than logicians? Probably because none can ad |

Posted: 18 Hours 48 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Ben Green, Gerald Edgar, AMS, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Socratis no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calc |

Posted: 18 Hours 51 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Ben Green, Gerald Edgar, AMS, Andrew Wiles, Socratis no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calc |

Posted: 18 Hours 53 Minutes ago by: mitchr...@gmail.com It becomes infinitely close to being 1 without being. What about a size of infinity dan? At its end you can add. |

Posted: 19 Hours 2 Minutes ago by: Socratis T.n.p. 0.1 *2 *10 = 2m^3 ==> 1i *20i *100i = 2000i^3. 0.2 *2 *10 = 4m^3 ==> 2i *20i *100i = 4'000i^3. 0.5 *2 *10 = 10m^3 => 5i *20i *100i =10'000i^3. 1 * 2 * 10 = 20m^3 => 10i *20i *100i =20'000i^3. Socratis ==> 15i *30i *60i = i30^3 = 27'000i^3 |

Posted: 19 Hours 9 Minutes ago by: FromTheRafters What is an axiom again? |

Posted: 19 Hours 11 Minutes ago by: FromTheRafters Because there's more to a set than just its elements? Maybe he can't see it because it is dark. |

Posted: 19 Hours 20 Minutes ago by: FromTheRafters Those which are not set-like. Proper Classes for instance. |

Posted: 19 Hours 37 Minutes ago by: Ross A. Finlayson Why not - Mitch is a giant troll (gullible troll). These are infinitesimals because they have properties of real numbers about zero and between zero and one. "I.e.: there are only real numbers everywhere in the real numbers". Then, |

Posted: 20 Hours 33 Minutes ago by: sergi o I think Mitch camps out in that infinitesimal |

Posted: 20 Hours 33 Minutes ago by: Gus Gassmann [...] Obvious enough that from the additional axiom (along with the other axioms of a theory) you can derive a statement P and its negation ~P --- wait!!! Let's restate that as "one can derive a statement P and its negation ~P". You can de |

Posted: 20 Hours 36 Minutes ago by: Dan joyce Nice contemporary art piece. |

Posted: 20 Hours 39 Minutes ago by: sobriquet Nice! It looks a bit like the biomorphic art from Giger. https://imgur.com/a/XzJ2nqY |

Posted: 20 Hours 47 Minutes ago by: Dan joyce Think of it this way Mitch. When .999... becomes so close to being 1, then what the hell lets call it 1. When pi or e or any transcendental or irrational number expressed to 30 decimal place it is perfectly normal to round up the last di |

Posted: 21 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson https://fractalforums.org/gallery/1612-210522234523.png |

Posted: 21 Hours 36 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium John Baez, Edward Witten, Brian Greene, Lisa Randall, Alan H. Guth, Michael E. Brown, Konstantin Batygin, Ben Bullock, Larry Harson, Mark Barton, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0. |

Posted: 21 Hours 56 Minutes ago by: Archimedes Plutonium So, I see no way of stopping Russia from bombing Ukraine, endless bombing. And the insane stupidity of Putin will likely make it a bargaining chip for lifting all sanctions on Russia. The only solution I can see is to remove Putin. And as |

Posted: 21 Hours 59 Minutes ago by: wij Definition ℚ: x∈ℚ iff ∃p,q∈ℤ, x=p/q You are all fooled by pythagoreans. |

Posted: 22 Hours 2 Minutes ago by: Chris M. Thomasson The square circle? Fwiw, here is a trigonometric version of a parametric square: x(t) = cos(t) * abs(cos(t)) y(t) = sin(t) * abs(sin(t)) t from 0 to pi2 ;^) In wolfram: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=x+%3D+cos%28t%29+*+abs%28 |

Posted: 22 Hours 8 Minutes ago by: sergi o Extra extra credit: [(HINT:"bunch"! + 1)] why? |

Posted: 22 Hours 17 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):ALL(b):[Even(a) & Even(b) => Even(a+b)] ALL(a):ALL(b):[Even(a) & Odd(b) => Odd(a+b)] ALL(a):ALL(b):[Odd(a) & Even(b) => Odd(a+b)] ALL(a):ALL(b):[Odd(a) & Odd(b) => Even(a+b)] Not sure whether this can be proved in a Dan-O-Matik st |

Posted: 22 Hours 32 Minutes ago by: Maron Umeki Russian Engineers Begin Cleaning Azovstal As Mariupol Comes Back To Life https://www.bitchute.com/video/omW5jwGQeNqR/ RT International News - May 21 2022 (0900 MSK)News - May 21 2022 (0900 MSK) https://www.brighteon.com/05509f19-9d56-4 |

Posted: 22 Hours 37 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse The foremost duty of every mathematician, name your structures carefully. Do not call something N, if it is not N. Like here: https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm Maybe use D instead? D = The Dan-O-Matik structure, who knows maybe 50 year |

Posted: 22 Hours 44 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse 6 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e d & b e d => a+b e d] Axiom Properties of + 7 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e d & b e d => a+b=b+a] Axiom https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm Where is associativity? LoL Where is all of Peano? LMAO! Do you see the problem, or are |

Posted: 22 Hours 45 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse 6 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e d & b e d => a+b e d] Axiom Properties of + 7 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e d & b e d => a+b=b+a] Axiom https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm Where is associativity? LoL Where is all of Peano? LMAO! Do you see the problem, or are |

Posted: 22 Hours 48 Minutes ago by: Mostowski Collapse 6 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e d & b e d => a+b e d] Axiom Properties of + 7 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e d & b e d => a+b=b+a] Axiom https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm Where is associativity? LoL Where is all of Peano? LMAO! Do you se |

Posted: 22 Hours 59 Minutes ago by: William It does not have to be obvious. It must be a contradiction. The Axiom of Infinity does not lead to a contradiction it leads to results you do not like, |

Posted: 23 Hours 29 Minutes ago by: Ross A. Finlayson "Double or nothing" It is like physics with the relativist and absolutist again, simply mathematics with the regular iteration and regular increment, again. Then, it really is at least _some_ matters of philosophy, that the primary ob |

Posted: 23 Hours 42 Minutes ago by: Ross A. Finlayson Seems like "one system is carry, the other is round". That for both of them it works out "in the infinite case..." that a limit exists. Of course I have a mathematics degree and the curriculum included some usual axioms of algebra's |

Posted: 23 Hours 56 Minutes ago by: sergi o how are those axioms ? |

Posted: 1 Day ago by: sergi o why would it ? your elements are all over the floor! (yes I realize that could make up a set of elements on the floor, but I haven't declared it as being a set yet (HINT)) Extra Credit : how many different sets would a "bunch" of eleme |

Posted: 1 Day ago by: WM The square circle exists by a similarly invalid axiom. Here are some more: Axiom of two even primes: There are two even prime numbers. Axiom of prime number triples: There is a second triple of prime numbers, besides (3, 5, 7). |

Posted: 1 Day ago by: sergi o Wrong. you do not even know math protocol! He defined a set S. so you deal with it, what is WRONG with you ? Wrong. "Every element of S has a successor in S" now you have a different set, it is not the same set. your think |

Posted: 1 Day ago by: Jim Burns As far as zooming out is concerned... We have pretty firm observations for the age/size of the _observable_ universe. For that, the answer is "not forever". Suppose we very reasonably assume that, of all the universe that exists, obser |

Posted: 1 Day ago by: WM Of course not, since there is nothing else. Which bunch of finitely many elements would not be a set? Regards, WM |

Posted: 1 Day ago by: Archimedes Plutonium So the pattern is set. Russia bombs bombs and bombs but can never hold on to territory because the Ukrainians will gun down all situated Russians. While the Russians keep bombing from outside of Ukraine. There will come a moment in time, pe |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Chris M. Thomasson The whole numbers are actually infinite. Get over it. |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Think of them as fingerprints, or snowflakes. The word unique comes to mind. Keep in mind that this is in the physical world. I am not sure if the physical world is infinite. Can we zoom in forever? Also, can we zoom out forever? I th |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Edward Witten, John Baez, Brian Greene, Lisa Randall, Alan H. Guth, Michael E. Brown, Konstantin Batygin, Ben Bullock, Larry Harson, Mark Barton, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5 |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Edward Witten, John Baez, Brian Greene, Lisa Randall, Alan H. Guth, Michael E. Brown, Konstantin Batygin, Ben Bullock, Larry Harson, Mark Barton, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Here is an example: https://www.shadertoy.com/view/3tlcz4 https://www.shadertoy.com/view/4lffzM |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Chris M. Thomasson The long division hits a cycle, and is therefore, rational. Right? |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 2:54:34 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: [snip] AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not b |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Dan Christensen Idiot! That should be: ALL(a):[a in N => [a < 0 => ... When will you learn, Jan Burse? Whatever proposition you tack on here will be vacuously true because there no elements of N that are less than 0. Poor Jan Burse still doesn't get |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Señor_Dingus Shut up idiot. |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: sergi o 1 - .999... = infinitesimal = 0 |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: sergi o wrong! For k = (m + n - 1)(m + n - 2)/2 + m holds for all m,n and k in |N "because they have aleph_0 successors in |N" shows *you do not understand equations*! you have lost the argument, and are irrelevant. when you take a sheep |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan, John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists like Dan Christensen than logicians? Probably because none can ad |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Is John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman, Harvey Friedman, more of propagandists like Dan Christensen than logicians? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, n |

Posted: 1 Day 1 Hour ago by: sergi o wrong quote. P exists because Cantor identifies it in his statement. from quote above: Zermelo confirms there exists the null set, and it is formally used. |

Posted: 1 Day 2 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Book cover =============================================Mathematics for Physicists pp 13–99 Cite as basics Helmut Fischer & Helmut Kaul Chapters 8296 accesses summary "By a set we understand every combination M of certai |

Posted: 1 Day 2 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Idiot! That should be: ALL(a):[a in N => s(a)=/=0] When will you learn, Jan Burse??? Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com |

Posted: 1 Day 2 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen I never made that claim. That is just you playing the silly bugger, Jan Burse. You are looking like a complete idiot here. Even your little buddy and fellow troll here knows better when to shut up. Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware |

Posted: 1 Day 2 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen It must be frustrating as hell for you, Jan Burse, but as I keep telling readers here and you don't seem to grasp: Lines 1-16 are sufficient results from basic arithmetic to prove the required result. Nothing more. Nothing less. Deal with |

Posted: 1 Day 2 Hours ago by: WM Where does he state it? This statement refers to sets: "P == O means that the set P does not contain any single point. So it is, strictly speaking, not existing as such." [Cantor, p. 146] This one too: "It is not a genuine set and was |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Joao Rodrigues, Betsie Jonck, Jesse Alt, Margaret Archibald, Witwatersrand, Andrew Wiles, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit anal |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: mitchr...@gmail.com But .999... plus zero equals .999... To get to 1 you need to add an infinitesimal instead. Mitchell Raemsch |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Did nobody tell Dan Christensen in school that one is only allowed to replace definitions by logically equivalent ones and not by weaker axioms. If you do the later you only get garbage. Like odd natural numbers where this is not prov |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden That's two very weak points, Wolfgang. Could it be that infinite values are capable of having specific successors and predecessors while their specific ordering is not actually possible? In other words is it naive to claim that 111.. |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Jim Burns Describe these fractions m/n. Describe these k/1 as some, but not all, of the m/n. From the descriptions, we know that for each k, there is m/n such that k = (m+n-1)*(m+n-2)/2+m and for each m/n, there is k such that k = (m+n-1)*(m+ |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Commutation of Conditionals https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Commutation-of-Conditionals If I am smart, then I can use DC Proof Therefore, if I can use DC Proof, then I am smart. Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Samstag |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Commutation of Conditionals https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Commutation-of-Conditionals If I am smart, then I can use DC Proof Therefore, if I can use DC Proof, then I am smart. Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Samstag |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse For example this here fails, its from Peano: ALL(a):[s(a)=\=0] Within F4: + 0 1 2 3 0 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 0 2 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 2 But F4 satisfies your EvenNextOdd. Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Samstag, 21. Mai 2022 um 19:00:47 UT |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse You cannot prove it from your nonsense. Because this alone: 6 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => a+b e n] Axiom Properties of + 7 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => a+b=b+a] Axiom as in your common rules of basic arithmetic here: http |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[s(a)=\=0] Within F4: + 0 1 2 3 0 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 0 2 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 2 But F4 satisfies your EvenNextOdd. Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Samstag, 21. Mai 2022 um 18:51:52 UTC+2: |

Posted: 1 Day 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 6 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => a+b e n] Axiom Properties of + 7 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => a+b=b+a] Axiom as in your common rules of basic arithmetic here: https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm Is not equivalen |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase Indeed. That's the the very point of this short paper by Frege: He tried to point out the difference between (his) "sets" and "entities" he called "classes" (referring to some statements by Schröder). Of course there was an empty "set" |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase I see. So let's consider the/all k with k e IN. So "these k don't cover all IN because they have aleph_0 successors in IN." (Actually, "these k don't cover all IN because _each and every_ k has aleph_0 successors in IN.") Yeah, exactly |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden big snip of lots of BEFORE and AFTER In this parlor of the infinite the elaborate redundancies that are being worked on get wiped away by some large value under whose rational system all values up though n can be enlisted via multiples |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: sergi o wrong, your dark numbers have no properties, you cannot conclude anything about them. |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: William Piffle. S exists by the Axiom of infinity, It is well known that you do not like the results of taking this axiom, but results that you do no like are not contradictions. |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: sergi o wrong. it is called the empty set. You ARE new to this aren't you? wrong quote, that refers to class, not sets. wrong quote. P exists because Cantor identifies it in his statement. |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: sergi o wrong quote. what you snipped "again "the set, "all elements", can have a property that "each element" does not have." you confuse sets with their elements, most all the time. Fail. |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: sergi o there is infinite redundancy WM remains confused, from above; integer fractions indexed fractions definable fractions already indexed fractions |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: WM There is no set S but only a pot. inf. collection S. Irrespective of how man elements you have accumulated, you can find or construct one more element. In order to have all together "all" must have a meaning. That requires actual infini |

Posted: 1 Day 4 Hours ago by: WM The set does not exist, strictly speaking. "If, according to our previous use of the word, a class consists of things, is a collection, a collective union of them, then it must disappear when these things disappear. If we burn down all |

Posted: 1 Day 5 Hours ago by: WM No, that is possible, but there is no actual infinity of them. Regards, WM |

Posted: 1 Day 5 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. Socratis He never said what you preach. Socratis has discovered the true mathematics which is called T.n.p.- While you don't know that: 0.2 *1 *2 = 0.4m^3 = 2i *10i *20i = 400i^3- You are part of the Profs: Idiots. Who do not understand th |

Posted: 1 Day 5 Hours ago by: WM Unter einer "Menge" verstehen wir jede Zusammenfassung M von bestimmten wohlunterschiedenen Objekten m unsrer Anschauung oder unseres Denkens (welche die "Elemente" von M genannt werden) zu einem Ganzen. "every collection of definite we |

Posted: 1 Day 5 Hours ago by: WM But these k don't cover all |N because they have aleph_0 successors in |N. That is why your k are irrelevant as a vanishing minority. When we take an element and throw it away, then we will not collect a set. Do you believe that this |

Posted: 1 Day 5 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. Socratis He never said what you say. Socratis has discovered the true mathematics which is called T.n.p.- While you don't know that: 0.1 *1 *2 = 0.2m^3 = 1i *10i *20i = 200i^3- You are part of the Profs: Idiots. Who do not understand the |

Posted: 1 Day 5 Hours ago by: WM But the number of their digits is not specified. No, the fractions 1/1 and 2/2 have the same value but are different fractions. Regards, WM |

Posted: 1 Day 6 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Soooooo cute the way you "stick up" for your little buddy and fellow troll here. (Wink, wink!) About 700 lines worth of handwaving there, Jan Burse. See my formal proof done right: https://www.dcproof.com/ConstructAddFunction.htm (76 |

Posted: 1 Day 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse /* add definition */ 0+x = x x'+y = (x+y)' The smallest such + Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Samstag, 21. Mai 2022 um 15:13:37 UTC+2: |

Posted: 1 Day 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse STudentTs beWAREe: Dan-O-Matik poop mathematics makes your brain sick. Come on Dan-O-Matik, its not so difficult to get it right. Use two primitive recursive definitions from Peano Axioms, you can use the circumscription condition as yo |

Posted: 1 Day 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen JG's Pathetic Daily Spam Post -- Same shit AGAIN and AGAIN! STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of John Gabriel's fake math On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 7:51:47 AM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel) wrote: [snip spam] JG here cl |

Posted: 1 Day 8 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 1 Day 8 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 1 Day 8 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 1 Day 8 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 1 Day 8 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 1 Day 9 Hours ago by: Darin Okimasa cetarle teeleevizia Khakhole nazi scumbags jumping up and down in Austria https://www.bitchute.com/video/h4k8Jcohl1X7/ |

Posted: 1 Day 9 Hours ago by: Deivi Ooka cetarle teeleevizia Khakhole nazi scumbags jumping up and down in Austria https://www.bitchute.com/video/h4k8Jcohl1X7/ |

Posted: 1 Day 11 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Yes, I recall another treatment that went into the 'arms race' of egg-spot patterns for other nest parasites like Brown-headed Cowbirds. Fascinating stuff. |

Posted: 1 Day 11 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters The CDE (Continued Decimal Expansion) of 1/3 is a *representation* of a number, not a number itself. There is no need to finish such a supertask for something that just represents a number. What is the CFE (Continued Fractional Expansi |

Posted: 1 Day 11 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Yes. That would be vacuously true since no natural numbers are less than 0. Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com |

Posted: 1 Day 12 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[a e n => [a < 0 => ~Odd(a)]] Dan Christensen schrieb am Freitag, 20. Mai 2022 um 15:01:21 UTC+2: |

Posted: 1 Day 13 Hours ago by: wij 1/3= Quo + Rem 1/3= 0 + 1/3 1/3= 0.3 + Rem // move 3/10 from Rem, add to Quo 1/3= 0.33 + Rem // move 3/100 from Rem , add to Quo .... 1/3= 0.333...+ nonzero_remainder // always holds, because long division is an endless algorithm |

Posted: 1 Day 13 Hours ago by: William Nope. Trivial counterexample Consider a Peano set S. Every element of S has a successor in S. S does not have a successor in S. So not any has less than 1 but "all together" has less than 1. |

Posted: 1 Day 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Science Council Rules Earth-- pattern setting in to Kharkiv, Donbas, Mariupol, and Russian Invasion. A pattern seems to be setting in to the courageous Ukraine fighting against the Russian invaders. This pattern is seen in the attempt of |

Posted: 1 Day 16 Hours ago by: sergi o Numbers and math have many great beautiful areas, Im currently working on a problem that has easy solutions for simple 2d patterns (that can extend to infinity), but degrades into complexity fast for more complex 2d patterns, primarly us |

Posted: 1 Day 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Now we can see that 23.23 x 26 = 603.98 while 26.26 x 23 = 603.98 And I was using that as a algebra to see if I can spot any other integer like 604 with that amazing symmetry. Of course algebra cannot fetch out some symmetries. And of |

Posted: 1 Day 18 Hours ago by: Mike Terry No, that's not right. What long division shows is stuff like: 1/3=0.333 + nonzero_remainder 1/3=0.3333333 + nonzero_remainder etc. where there are only finitely many 3s in the decimal expansion. You CAN'T ACTUALLY PERF |

Posted: 1 Day 19 Hours ago by: wij [P1] From long division, we can have the true equality: 1/3=0.333... + nonzero_remainder This should be the basic instance where the repeating decimal problem is from. The infinite steps of the long division method in the conversio |

Posted: 1 Day 20 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium So, here is a fascinating question of both physics and mathematics. Is the pure number of 604 with square root being 24.57641.... the only number in all of mathematics that is boxed in by an upper and lower bound of 26.260 and 23.230? I |

Posted: 1 Day 21 Hours ago by: Major Uesugi you disgusting Khakhole scum jumping up and down in Austria https://www.bitchute.com/video/h4k8Jcohl1X7/ |

Posted: 1 Day 21 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I saw a recent Nova about the camo of bird eggs trying to evade the dreaded parasitic cuckoo, that love to "replace" eggs in existing nests... |

Posted: 1 Day 22 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters https://www.forbes.com/sites/kionasmith/2017/06/24/alan-turing-described-natures-beauty-with-numbers/?shs7a7dfc77ae Might be a paywall. https://www.bbcearth.com/news/the-maths-behind-a-leopards-spots |

Posted: 1 Day 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Is Gregory Chaitin, Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A.E. Dummett, more of propagandists like Dan Christensen than logicians? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the |

Posted: 1 Day 23 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase Ach, halt doch mal die Fresse, Du Troll! Nonsense. Hint: The set {} is empty. Which of its elements is empty too? The set {{0, 1}} contains exactly ONE element, namely the set {0, 1}, but this element contains ZWO elements, namely 0 an |

Posted: 1 Day 23 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase Ach, halt Dich mal die Fresse, Du Troll! Nonsense. Hint: The set {} is empty. Which of its elements is empty too? The set {{0, 1}} contains exactly ONE element, namely the set {0, 1}, but this element contains ZWO elements, namely 0 an |

Posted: 1 Day 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Now I am going to have to talk about something that is exceedingly ugly, very very ugly. But no more ugly than a petty dictator starting a nuclear war all because that petty dictator had slipped into insanity and pushed the nuclear buttons. |

Posted: 2 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium So, earlier this year I noticed a remarkable feature of the number 604, perhaps a unique feature that no other number in mathematics has (not sure of that claim as yet)? The feature of 604/23 = 26.260.... while 604/26 = 23.230.... Let |

Posted: 2 Days ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Interesting. Humm... Well, shit. All numbers are dark to a baby? Humm... Almost all? |

Posted: 2 Days ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Excellent response! A Jacuzzi is a spa... However, not all spas are a jacuzzi, in a sense... ;^) Did I pick up on your sense, in a sense... :^) |

Posted: 2 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium In AP's 188th book of Science, he derives the Infinity borderline of mathematics from the Physics constants of speed of light and Planck's constant. As I write in my 188th book of science: So, I am trying to obtain the infinity borderli |

Posted: 2 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Poem-Shit-for-brains, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Ben Green, Gerald Edgar, AMS, Socratis no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Funda |

Posted: 2 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Andrew Wiles, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Ben Green, Gerald Edgar, AMS, Socratis no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calc |

Posted: 2 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Ben Green, Gerald Edgar, AMS, Socratis no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calc |

Posted: 2 Days 1 Hour ago by: Grant Shirasu yet another proof, the nazi "ukraine" cocaine oligarchs, have no soldiers to be send to die for them in war. The azov nazis got the picture, finally, and now leaves. Ukraine eyes law to deprive people of citizenship The proposed law |

Posted: 2 Days 1 Hour ago by: Jim Burns I heard somewhere that black panthers have spots -- black-on-black spots. The problem with WM's dark numbers is that he thinks it's impossible to talk about only non-black-panther leopards. |

Posted: 2 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Joao Rodrigues, Betsie Jonck, Jesse Alt, Margaret Archibald, Witwatersrand no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analy |

Posted: 2 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Amine on Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Hugh David Politzer, Frank Wilczek, Raymond Davis Jr.,Adam G. Riess, John C. Mather. Amine and McGinn why?? They be |

Posted: 2 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Science Council Rules Earth--- The pollution of the West by bad guy countries needs to stop. --- quoting BBC on Ukraine nuclear power plant Zaporizhzhia --- Ukraine has dismissed as "wishful thinking" Russia's plan to connect a giant Ukrai |

Posted: 2 Days 1 Hour ago by: Chris M. Thomasson dark numbers written on a contrasting color of paper can be read? Imaging using black ink to write on a piece of paper that is black. WM's dark numbers... ;^) |

Posted: 2 Days 2 Hours ago by: Jim Burns "Calculemus." -- Gottfried Leibniz These fractions: m/n such thatm and n are _definable_ =only finite-many '+1' from 0 =for each BEFORE and AFTER =< m and each BEFORE and AFTER =< n, some j ends BEFORE and j+1 begins AFTER. Calculemu |

Posted: 2 Days 3 Hours ago by: Ney Eto They are asking about you, you deplorable nazi shit. Pushing lethal injections in humans, you *nazis* are going to hang in trees. THE PLAN - WHO plans for 10 years of pandemics, from 2020 to 2030 https://rumble.com/v13kefy-must-see-the- |

Posted: 2 Days 4 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. PT09PT4gVC5kLmkuID09PT09PSBULm4ucC4gPD09PT09DQoNCjIwaSAvMTBpID0gMmkgPT09PiAy aSAqMTBpID0gMjBpID0gMg0KMzBpLzEwaSA9IDNpID09PT4gM2kgKiAxMGkgPSAzMGkgPSAzDQo0 MGkvMTBpID0gNGkgPT09PiA0aSAqIDEwaSA9IDQwaS49IDQNCg0KMjAwYyAvMmMgPTEwMGMgPT4g MTAwYyAqM |

Posted: 2 Days 4 Hours ago by: sergi o 666 + 999 = 1665 so when you add 9s it pulls out a 1 off the rightmost digit, and puts it in a 1 up front ! 999 + 999 = 1998 see ! 4 + 9 = 13 !! 22,222,222 + 9,999,999 = 122,222,221 ! Extra credit problem; when does t |

Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: sergi o no, your claim is absolutely stupid, and intentionally misleading. if you believe that, you do not believe in equations. |

Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. PT09PT4gVC5kLmkuID09PT09PT09PT0gVC5uLnAuIDw9PT09PT09PT09PQ0KDQowLjEgKjIgKjEw ID0gMm1eMyA9PT4gMWkgKjIwaSAqMTAwaSA9IDIwMDBpXjMNCjAuMiAqMiAqMTAgPSAybV4zID09 PiAyaSAqMjBpICoxMDBpID0gNCcwMDBpXjMNCjAuNSAqMiAqMTAgPSAxMG1eMyA9PiA1aSAqMjBp ICoxMDBpI |

Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: sergi o you are outside of math, with your black numbers, magic math, it is stupid math. |

Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: sergi o they are not facts at all, its your misleading bullshit Wrong. by bijecting them with the fractions of the first column (we could use every other column or line as well Wrong. ). When applying the indexes for indexing fractions such |

Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Do pay attention, Jan Burse. Lines 1-14 are just some results from basic arithmetic on N as required in this proof. Each is derivable from Peano Axioms (also not shown here). Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.c |

Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Here, the definition of Even can only be applied for natural numbers. Sorry, it doesn't work for your "dark elements," Jan Burse. Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.w |

Posted: 2 Days 8 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden Well, perhaps you are wrong. Here we have some infinite numbers whose last digits are specified. I know because I specified them. I can at least increment the damn thing and I can do it many times. I do find it interesting that you lean |

Posted: 2 Days 9 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann Of course. Proof by intimidation. "It is true because WM says so." What a load of shit. |

Posted: 2 Days 9 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters You have said this before, do you have a citation for that? |

Posted: 2 Days 9 Hours ago by: WM My claim is absolutely true because every index supplied to a fraction is taken from a fraction: the integer fractions have to supply these indexes. You do, because you deny that every index supplied to a fraction is taken from a fracti |

Posted: 2 Days 9 Hours ago by: WM You are outside of logic. The set is nothing else but all its elements. If no natural number of N_p has less successors between itself and omega, then all natural numbers have not less successors. Note not any has less means all together |

Posted: 2 Days 9 Hours ago by: WM Here it is justified because the idea that no natural number of N_p has less successors between itself and omega but they all together cover these successors, is deepest medieval belief in black magic. And I dare to guess that not even th |

Posted: 2 Days 10 Hours ago by: WM No. The last digits cannot be known because they would put three dark numbers in an order. Dark numbers however cannot be ordered. This is proved best by dark fractions. Try to enumerate all positive fractions. 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ... |

Posted: 2 Days 10 Hours ago by: WM Wo you are not willing to analyse the facts. Enumerate all positive fractions. 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ... 2/1, 2/2, 2/3, 2/4, ... 3/1, 3/2, 3/3, 3/4, ... 4/1, 4/2, 4/3, 4/4, ... 5/1, 5/2, 5/3, 5/4, ... |

Posted: 2 Days 15 Hours ago by: Ross A. Finlayson 999! |

Posted: 2 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium John Gabriel on Lisa Randall, Dr. Hau, Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish, David J.. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita, Arthur B. McDonald, |

Posted: 2 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 2 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 2 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 2 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 2 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 2 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium My favorite of all musicians has died today-- Vangelis, and I am in tears listening to Chariots of Fire tonight, atom, God be with you Vangelis... Seems like not too long ago I nominated Vangelis for a Nobel Peace prize. They did it for Bo |

Posted: 2 Days 16 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. 0.1 *2 *10 = 2m^3 ==> 1i *20i *100i = 2000i^3 0.2 *2 *10 = 2m^3 ==> 2i *20i *100i = 4'000i^3 0.5 *2 *10 = 10m^3 => 5i *20i *100i '000i^3 1 * 2 * 10 = 10m^3 => 10i *20i *100i '000i^3- Socratis 5^3 +7^3 = 12 *(5*7 +2^2) = 468m^3 |

Posted: 2 Days 16 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. 0.1 *1 *10 = 1m^3 ==> 1i *10i *100i = 1000i^3 0.2 *1 *10 = 2m^3 ==> 2i *10i *100i = 2'000i^3 0.5 *1 *10 = 5m^3 ==> 5i *10i * 100i = 5'000i^3 1 * 1 * 10 = 10m^3 => 10i *10i *100i =10'000i^3- La Matematica non produce Linee...Ma quadrati e V |

Posted: 2 Days 17 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson https://fractalforums.org/gallery/1612-200522031824.png |

Posted: 2 Days 18 Hours ago by: David Petry I got the Robinson quotes from a Wikipedia article on "actual infinity". That article didn't include the second paragraph. What Fred Jeffries wrote in a previous article is almost exactly what he should be saying in response to (ii) |

Posted: 2 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Amine on Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Hugh David Politzer, Frank Wilczek, Raymond Davis Jr.,Adam G. Riess, Makoto Kobayashi, John C. Mather. Amine and McGinn why?? They b |

Posted: 2 Days 20 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden 'collectively' is a terminology that seems uncontroversial and acceptable. To what degree we work collectively here on usenet I wouldn't care to say, yet somehow it does hold true. Clearly definitions only work within their collective. If |

Posted: 2 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium 134th published book Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already writ |

Posted: 2 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Amine on Yoichiro Nambu, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Hugh David Politzer, Frank Wilczek, Raymond Davis Jr.,Adam G. Riess, Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, John C. Mather. Amine and McGinn why?? They be |

Posted: 2 Days 22 Hours ago by: Cleo Hirota not true, you can't add anything, the 9 goes to infinity, hence anything you add, fucks up your integer. One thing is for certain, *_it_never_converges_*. Just think again, deeper, not faster. |

Posted: 2 Days 22 Hours ago by: Lon Ebina come on, it's not my fault aioe banned relativity for posting. I am a nice man. I rarely insult anyone, an only as an insult in return. You can't blame me. Blame that gearmon wanker "homepage_designer" not knowing what he does. |

Posted: 2 Days 23 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney Of course. 1+0=1. |

Posted: 2 Days 23 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Do you mean: |

Posted: 3 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Stimulation in biology is far far different than that of "becoming young once again". I remember when Trump got off the plane after treatment for covid virus, and the treatment involved some high stimulants. And of course Trump would have r |

Posted: 3 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Hard to believe just 4 months ago the formation of Science Council to Rule Earth had been borne-- NATO, but now we have USA Supreme Court a primitive outhouse of Science. In all my years of writing on Science Council Rules Earth, I had th |

Posted: 3 Days 1 Hour ago by: Jim Burns Natural numbers are only definable =only finitely-many '+1' from 0 =only k such that, for each BEFORE and AFTER =< k, some j ends BEFORE and j+1 begins AFTER. This is why induction does not have any exceptions where it is intended to be |

Posted: 3 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium John Gabriel on Lisa Randall, Dr. Hau, Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish, David J.. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita, Arthur B. McDonald, |

Posted: 3 Days 1 Hour ago by: sergi o <snip crap> |

Posted: 3 Days 1 Hour ago by: sergi o <snip crap> <snip crap> |

Posted: 3 Days 1 Hour ago by: WM Those are number whihc can on,y be defined collectively. For every definable number we find ℵo successors ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo after n and before omega. For all natural numbers, defined collectively, we |

Posted: 3 Days 2 Hours ago by: WM Of course. Induction covers only the collection of definable natural numbers. That does not exclude aleph_0 dark numbers immediately before omega. I use it in the correct way: A quantity larger than all finite quantities. "In spite of |

Posted: 3 Days 2 Hours ago by: sergi o T24gNS8xOS8yMDIyIDk6NTEgQU0sIFRpbW90aHkgR29sZGVuIHdyb3RlOg0KPiBPbiBXZWRu ZXNkYXksIE1heSAxOCwgMjAyMiBhdCAxOjIzOjIwIEFNIFVUQy00LCB6ZWxvcy4uLkBnbWFp bC5jb20gd3JvdGU6DQo+PiB0aXNkYWcgMTcgbWFqIDIwMjIga2wuIDE5OjIxOjIxIFVUQysy IHNrcmV2IHRpbWJhLi4uQ |

Posted: 3 Days 2 Hours ago by: sergi o Whoa! hold on there Cowboy, you cant get something for nothing. did you own the .999 repeating ? if you don't own it, you cant get it. do you own an infinitesimal ? if you don't own it, you cant get it. |

Posted: 3 Days 3 Hours ago by: sergi o whoa! you should have used |chop| |

Posted: 3 Days 3 Hours ago by: mitchr...@gmail.com and you get the first integer. |

Posted: 3 Days 3 Hours ago by: Jim Burns Both dark numbers and omega are irrelevant to natural-number induction. It applies where it applies because, for each BEFORE and AFTER =< where it applies, some j ends BEFORE and j+1 begins AFTER. What excludes dark numbers immediately |

Posted: 3 Days 3 Hours ago by: Jim Burns 1. Some claims are not completely true. 2. Some claims are completely true. The method which I advocate starts with type 2 claims and proceeds to further claims _only_ by methods that can _only_ give a type 2 claim from type 2 claims. |

Posted: 3 Days 4 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Two ways for formally define a predicate https://groups.google.com/g/sci.logic/c/gV50jEU6fvQ Not about proving some arbitrary two theorems. Did you define even natural number or not? Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 19. Mai 202 |

Posted: 3 Days 4 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[a e n => 2*a+2 =\= 0] Counter Model: 1 e F4 Thats why you cannot prove: ALL(a):[a e n => (a < 0 => ~Odd(a))] Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2022 um 17:58:06 UTC+2: |

Posted: 3 Days 4 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[Even(a) => a e n] If not your „even“ might talk about fish or bicycle. LoL Dan Christensen schrieb am Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2022 um 17:49:48 UTC+2: |

Posted: 3 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen As usual, you seem to have entirely missed the point, Jan Burse. In the above proof, I formally prove: (1) ALL(a):[a e n => [Even(a) => Odd(a+1)]] (2) ALL(a):[a e n => Even(2*a) & Odd(2*a+1)] Given some results from basic arithmetic o |

Posted: 3 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergi o your direction always is 'not math'. there are no dark numbers. sorry, infinity is bigger than finite. meaningless drivel. |

Posted: 3 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergi o no, the set of natural numbers is an infinite set. no, if they are missing, someone must have noticed that they are missing. |

Posted: 3 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergi o he called you a silly troll, which I disagree with. But I have to ask, what type of program are you using to generate such large volumes of non-applicable fluff ? |

Posted: 3 Days 5 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden Ah, the foot and the meter have physical definitions and as units they are unique. But the conjunction of one foot and the definition of the foot are one and the same. If you could differentiate that I'd be impressed. Dimensional analysis |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Something similar is used to denote large primes, and it is not an infinite form used this way. |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann Ah, the quantifier switch. Nice! |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann Imaginative editing. Very funny! |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: William Indeed, between each element of the set N_p and omega there are aleph_0 successors Nope because the set, "all elements", can have a property that "each element" does not have. Each *element* of N_p is finite. The *set* N_p is infin |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o no, your claim is troll BS. |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden I haven't done anything to the notation. I have no idea where this question comes from. I really don't see where you are going with this. I guess you are saying this is the use of IN in the prior text? A long time ago I did ask for an |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o outright lie. |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o Wrong. Wrong. Wrong, numbers do not count themselves Your "definable" is only for stoners do you disagree ? call the natural number k, so k has less successors between itself and omega. obviously false Wrong, between the eleme |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM The set of indices is |N, a constant set. The set of missing indices is constant too and larger than |N. Regards, WM |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o wrong, all fractions are enumerated. case closed. wrong. all fractions are enumerated. case closed. |

Posted: 3 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM Potentially infinite, never actually infinite. For that sake it must have more than any natural number of numbers. This is impossible with definable natural numbers since they count them selves and never leave the finite domain. You clai |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM So it appears to someone who never faced in the right direction. What is wrong with my direction? (Except that it disproves your beliefs.) That does not exclude aleph_0 dark numbers immediately before omega. Impossible if actual infi |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM I have read it but I have not seen a refutation of my claim that in my matrix the share of enumerated fractions is |N| and the share of not enumerated fractions is |N|^2 - |N|, and that will never change. It is a true claim for the whole |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM An exception of your claim that completely true claims do not _become_ true. My claim *is* true: In spite of your triangle numbers it is clear that in my matrix the share of enumerated fractions is |N| and the share of not enumerated fr |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM Of course. The shares of enumerated and not enumerated fractions do never change. That is the only important feature. Whether we can finish or not, is irrelevant. Regards, WM |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden Wow, that brings passive aggressive to a whole new level! The values under discussion here are infinite forms right? Is 333...3 an infinite form? Yes. Are ellipses in use in mathematics? Yes. Are they used in number theory? Yes. It happ |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensens fake math Dan Christensen is here, he claims to have even natural numbers by this nonsense: https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm One can even not prove: ~EXIST(a):[a e n & a < 0] D |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse LoL Yony Mazuka schrieb: |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen WAR OF AGGRESSION = NAZI You don't understand--maybe you do?--what a horrible position your Fuhrer has put your country in. You will take generations to recover. The sooner you start, the better. |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Desperately trying to change the subject, Jan Burse? Can't blame you. You are getting your butt kicked here, but I made no claims about any numbers other than N. Just admit you were wrong and move on. You are looking very crankish here |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen JG's Pathetic Daily Spam Post -- Same shit AGAIN and AGAIN! STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of John Gabriel's fake math On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 11:43:20 PM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel) wrote: JG here claims to hav |

Posted: 3 Days 7 Hours ago by: Aubry Muso here you have your nazi, you nazi. Pay attention, there are some *two_nazi_women* excrement among the terrorists. I guess they sucked alot of nazi dick along the period journey. Sad the russians are not evil enough. The "war" had been |

Posted: 3 Days 9 Hours ago by: Nilo Kiski you don't undrestand tensors, you putrid nazi excrement. UK Column News 18th May 2022 https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-18th-may-2022 23:13 - The Word "Surrender" Is Out and "Evacuate" Is In, Sources: ************* |

Posted: 3 Days 9 Hours ago by: Eloy Ikeda watch here the extreme nazis, you repugnant nazi human excrement. *_Facts_*, not "propaganda". UK Column News 18th May 2022 https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-18th-may-2022 23:13 - The Word "Surrender" Is Out and "E |

Posted: 3 Days 11 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse If and only if it were N, and not something else maybe. LoL Dan Christensen schrieb am Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2022 um 02:03:24 UTC+2: |

Posted: 3 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Alright, just tonight I had a chance to read the full article. And I am going to revert myself back to the old tried and true and logical theory that ageing is caused by the accumulation of mistakes in the body. I do not buy this new resea |

Posted: 3 Days 14 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com your "definable" is MEANINGLESS False, they belong to N which is not finite. |

Posted: 3 Days 14 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com this is meaningless for what you want to do |

Posted: 3 Days 14 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com you are a total failure WM |

Posted: 3 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium The quadrapole star system of HD 98800 picture looks even more like a donut with the fake interpretation it is a black hole, when not true. It is a 4 star system. Another means of getting a donut shape galaxy is that we need not have a pa |

Posted: 3 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 3 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 3 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 3 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 3 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 3 Days 19 Hours ago by: sergi o ? |

Posted: 3 Days 19 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase Concerning Mückenheim that's _always_ the case. |

Posted: 3 Days 19 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase Fascinating, you psychotic asshole full of shit. So in your psychotic kingdom P(0) & An(n e IN & P(n) -> P(n+1)) does NOT imply An e IN: P(n) ? Hint: An e IN: P(n) means that THERE IS NO natural number n such that P(n) does NOT HOL |

Posted: 3 Days 20 Hours ago by: Jim Burns No. You are facing in the wrong direction. Stand on a number k finitely-many '+1" from 0. Turn away from omega and look at 0. k is subject to induction *because* k is finitely-many '+1' from 0. If the truth-value of P(i) changes, in |

Posted: 3 Days 20 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase Fuck off, you silly troll. Hint: We were talking about NATURAL NUMBERS! GOT THAT, you silly asshole full of shit?! *PLONK* |

Posted: 3 Days 20 Hours ago by: sergi o wrong, omega is not needed. "vanish" is not a mathematical term. Omega is diversion. wrong, no set is specified. So, how does the element 17 span an infinite set ? hokie-pokie baloney, prove it. you are spouting nonsense. use |

Posted: 3 Days 20 Hours ago by: sergi o ok so you state 17 has as many successors as 100^100^100 ? Wrong. try re-wording that. Wrong. The set is not a natural number, and neither is omega. you are the one with the wrong implied mumbo-jumbo, but you are crank, and tha |

Posted: 3 Days 20 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Maybe you didn't know, but this is the formal definition of < on N (line 13). Used on line 50. Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com |

Posted: 3 Days 20 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Almost ready to code up your work. I showed them to David Makin. https://ibb.co/c1CP79c I asked him if I have permission to show his private comments to you. https://i.ibb.co/PN9RfyZ/image.png |

Posted: 3 Days 20 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Will Roberts Court ban 1/2 eunuch status and have to use alleys with coat hangers?? Qwbr-fml describes wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic///Science &Technology Supreme Court involving sci |

Posted: 3 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Well Qwbr-fml is sometimes seen describing Mathopedia as orgasmic, cool, super orgastic climax. But AP, King of Science thinks Qwb is just trying to be funny, making fun of the fact that AP, King of Science is 1/2 eunuch, and proud of it, f |

Posted: 3 Days 21 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen I probably don't have to tell you, but your job became impossible when the ruSSian bombs started falling. The facts are killing you. It was no longer possible to pretend. Even diehard Trump fans began to wonder. |

Posted: 3 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Absolutely interesting and some evidence in favor of this theory-- a theory that the normal growth of a organism keeps on going when it should slow down, and thus ageing in their viewpoint is sort of a "Burn-out" of the body. AP |

Posted: 3 Days 21 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Still waiting, should we use this: ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [a<b <=> EXIST(c):[c e n & ~c=0 & a+c=b]]] https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm To order the reals? The rest of the axioms except for Nr. 10 are also satisfied by the |

Posted: 3 Days 21 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ruSSia needs a patriotic internet How its going: Google Moscow files bankruptcy Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 um 01:20:29 UTC+2: |

Posted: 3 Days 21 Hours ago by: Daven Okui another error, facts are never propaganda. You can't take facts?? Which country are you? |

Posted: 3 Days 21 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden I don't get your nonsense. Let n = 333...34. then n+1 is 333...35. zero is still zero and one is still one. Already at what? we're discussing WM's dark numbers, roughly. As you dodge the usage of the ellipsis and play dumb, the rational v |

Posted: 3 Days 22 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Ummm... Forget math, Nazi boy. Better stick to what you do best -- Nazi ruSSian propaganda. Even this you are not very good at, but nevertheless. |

Posted: 3 Days 22 Hours ago by: Keven Togo do it yourself, but you don't know the difference between a suppose and a proof requirement. |

Posted: 3 Days 22 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase You know there's a smallest natural number, usually called 0 (or 1). Which of your symbols donotes 0 (or 1)? And if we are already at that, if X denotes the natural number n which symbol denotes the natural number n+1? You see there' |

Posted: 3 Days 22 Hours ago by: Abram Mitsubishi Ctrl - Left could you please elaborate. |

Posted: 3 Days 22 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Obviously YOU cannot elaborate. HA, HA, HA!!!! (xaxaxa!!!) |

Posted: 3 Days 22 Hours ago by: Robt Kuno impossible. It's inconsistent. You can't expect inconsistencies to be elaborated. |

Posted: 3 Days 22 Hours ago by: Diego Ozu amazing with this severely uneducated individual. Using IFF implying "suppose", then using "suppose" implying _proof_. Then not a wonder the cretin keeps using double negations as war of aggression, once the _war_ already includes the |

Posted: 3 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium R5519 is a collisional ring galaxy, having been formed by a passerby galaxy plowing straight through the middle of a spiral galaxy, resulting in R5519 being transformed into the shape of a donut, once the passerby galaxy had gone away. But |

Posted: 3 Days 23 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden Sorry I didn't answer your question directly: yes: addition works: 333...29 + 5 = 333...34 333...29 + 333...34 = 666...63 |

Posted: 3 Days 23 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden To be honest with you I suspect that this form will eventually be treated as invalid. This form is already in use though it is not appreciated. I am referring to the decimal value as when we write: 1/3 = 0.333... and we observe that t |

Posted: 3 Days 23 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters You claim this. This means that you are accepting the successor function (each and every element of N has one successor) and induction, so don't try to disclaim it later. |

Posted: 3 Days 23 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Not even close. :) They are partitioning sets and those aren't even sets. |

Posted: 3 Days 23 Hours ago by: WM You claim that every natural number has aleph_0 successors between itself and omega. That implies that no natural number has less successors between itself and omega. That implies that between all elements of the the set of all natural nu |

Posted: 3 Days 23 Hours ago by: WM This statement is wrong if there is omega existing. Between every number subject to induction and omega there are aleph_0 natural numbers which are not subject to induction because they do never vanish. numbers [that] have ℵo successo |

Posted: 4 Days ago by: Fritz Feldhase You are sure that you are talking about _natural_ numbers (i.e. the elements in IN) AND the usual order defined on them? Say, n < m :<-> Ek e IN \ {0}: n + k = m , where + is the usual addition defined on IN. |

Posted: 4 Days ago by: Timothy Golden More carefully: ..., 333...29, 333...30, 333...31, 333...32, 333...33 |split| 333...34, 333...35, 333...36, ... |

Posted: 4 Days ago by: Timothy Golden Well, going off of my new interpretation I can split them at: 333...33 versus 333...34. How's that? |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: Fritz Feldhase That's indeed true! (Big surprise!) Not "consecutive" (though infiite). What he's talking about here is a partition of IN into two _infinite_ sets {a_1, a_2, a_3 ...} and {b_1, b_2, b_3, ...} such that a_i < b_j, for all i.j e IN. ( |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: casagiannoni A certain type of mathematically defined systems of semi-chaos have progressive states as represented by points on the XY coordinate plane. If random, then points would range evenly over the plane, but these systems have strong attractors |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: Dan Christensen If you want to be taken seriously, you will have to elaborate. Otherwise... Dan |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: Jim Burns Thank you for your kind words. I would very much like WM to read it, but I make no prediction in that regard. He's not my only possible reader, though. I imagine myself putting a light in the window for those trying to find their |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: Dan Christensen I suppose you didn't do very well in math class. Too busy reading Mein Kampf. Remember: WAR OF AGREESION = NAZI Dan |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: sergi o wrong, it is provee for all natural numbers. wrong, he said all natural numbers. Did you miss that ? wrong, By induction we can prove that the numbers reached by induction upto ω. Wrong, it is all natural numbers, the entire set, |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium "Ageing Upturned" New Scientist, 30Apr2022// And here I thought "accumulation of errors" was the mechanism of aging. I welcome news articles that are almost 180degrees opposite of what everyone is thinking. Of course, AP has his share of |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: Fritz Feldhase Or all elements in in IN. Right. Using symbols: An(n e IN -> P(n)) or An e IN: P(n). Right! No, we don't know that IN is finite. Hint: "Mathematical induction is a mathematical proof technique. It is essentially used to prove that a |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: Timothy Golden I wonder to what degree those concerned with natural valued infinity are possibly entertaining the birth of the continuum? As you start plopping down positions on a line and they keep going at some large value the discernment of the small |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: Heath Soma inconsistent. |

Posted: 4 Days 1 Hour ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Humm.... I like that idea! |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: Derek Otaka Mitchell Center Podcast: Naming the Problem: Capitalism is the Crisis Richard Wolff https://www.rdwolff.com/mitchell_center_podcast_naming_the_problem_capitalism_is_the_crisis |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: sergi o that is a very clear presentation. |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase So what?! Do you psychotic asshole full of shit understand the significance of the statement "(ii) Nevertheless, we should continue the business of Mathematics 'as usual,' i.e. we should act as if infinite totalities really existed." [A |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Go ahead, we'll wait. While we are waiting, why don't you tell us what 'successors before ω' means here. |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium #5-1, 134th published book Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had alre |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: Abel Godo Drained, Exhausted, Defeated: Watch Fighters From Besieged Azovstal Surrender to Russian Forces https://sputniknews.com/20220518/drained-exhausted-defeated-watch-fighters-from-besieged-azovstal-surrender-to-russian-forces-1095606900.html |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: WM Let's continue with the origianl source: "I feel quite unable to grasp the idea of an actual infinite totality. To me there appears to exist an unbridgeable gulf between sets or structures of one, or two, or five elements, on one hand, a |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: Ai Abe European Parliament Plans to Add Former German Chancellor Schroeder to Sanctions List: Report https://sputniknews.com/20220518/european-parliament-plans-to-add-former-german-chancellor-schroder-to-sanctions-list-1095602542.html |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: WM We prove it for all definable natural numbers. You know that the set of numbers which this is proved for is always finite? By induction we can prove that the numbers reached by induction have ℵo successors before ω.Therefore the |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: Alto Handa so true |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: Jim Burns Some claims are true of each natural number. Some claims are not true of each natural number. We can reason from the first kind of claim to further claims also true of each natural number. I don't know what you mean by "exception". Do |

Posted: 4 Days 2 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Some of the most severely ignorant and dumb clutch scientists, physicists in the entire world, to ever live and think they are in physics, are those that say, yes, yes to Pauli Exclusion Principle, yes, yes. But on the other side of their m |

Posted: 4 Days 3 Hours ago by: Zev Gensai you sure? |

Posted: 4 Days 3 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium R5519 Halo donut shaped galaxy is real-- recent two black holes are bullshit. If one looks at the animation of R5519 and sees that a spherical galaxy has its interior blown out by a passerby galaxy, leaving the spherical galaxy now to beco |

Posted: 4 Days 3 Hours ago by: Drew Idane not sure |

Posted: 4 Days 3 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Ayaz, police drag net spam help cause and contribute to BUFFALO shooting As the Criminal deranged shooter in Buffalo, sits down to read say sci.physics and other newsgroups laden with the toxic poison of drag net spam like Ayaz ayaz.s |

Posted: 4 Days 4 Hours ago by: sobriquet But then what does it mean when we prove something with mathematical induction? I would assume that if we proof a property P(n) for natural numbers n with induction, that means that for all natural numbers n, P(n) holds. But since there i |

Posted: 4 Days 4 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann Well, in a sense he is right: Since he is too dense to even understand what the task is, he never starts and pretends that that has done the job. It is clear that trying to talk sense into him is a waste of breath (or electrons, as the ca |

Posted: 4 Days 4 Hours ago by: FredJeffries Inasmuch as no one understood the point I was trying to make, I will only apologize for being such a bad expositor and wasting your time with my semi-rant. I will not pursue the matter further. On to bookkeeping points: I am not responsi |

Posted: 4 Days 4 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters What? |

Posted: 4 Days 4 Hours ago by: Yony Mazuka ### Suppose that it is sunny if any only if it is it not cloudy. 1 Sunny <=> ~Cloudy Premise ### plus that you illegally use IFF (if and only if), which makes you the nazi imbecile, people are talking about you, fooling arou |

Posted: 4 Days 4 Hours ago by: Sam Fukao ### Suppose that it is sunny if any only if it is it not cloudy. 1 Sunny <=> ~Cloudy Premise ### How on earth can a "suppose" ever become a proof, idiot. You can't suppose that, please suppose something else. |

Posted: 4 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o you are just bullshitting again. Here is your equation; ∀n ∈ ℕ_ind: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo . That does not answer the question which element n is. n has been claimed to be an element. which one is n ? or is your e |

Posted: 4 Days 6 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann What did I just say? Your sequence of matrices is decidedly *NOT* a constant set, at least not in any way that you seem to think of it. You do *NOT* have the first clue about limits. |

Posted: 4 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o above corrected. |

Posted: 4 Days 6 Hours ago by: William No *element* of N_p is infinite. The *set* N_p is infinite. |

Posted: 4 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o then why do you limit your swaparoofest to finite ? Define a constant set. do you mean a set that does not change with time ? or do you mean a set of constants or do you mean sets with the same number of elements ? |

Posted: 4 Days 6 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen So cute the way you "stick up" for your fellow trolls here, Jan Burse! There, from a list of results from basic arithmetic on N (lines 1-14) and a standard definition of EVEN and ODD (lines 15-16), I was able to formally derive: ALL(a |

Posted: 4 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o No. The taken set is a fixed finite set. Your increase is deception. you are the one that "exhausts" infinite sets. your argument is moot, a diversion. |

Posted: 4 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen "Sticking up" for your little buddy and fellow troll as always, Jan Burse? (Wink, wink!) There, from a list of results from basic arithmetic on N (lines 1-14) and a standard definition of EVEN and ODD (lines 15-16), I was able to formal |

Posted: 4 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM First: Limits are not relevant when enumerating elements. Second: The limit of a constant set is a constant set. Regards, WM |

Posted: 4 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM That does not answer the question which element it is. k has been claimed to be an element. But whe we state that k is an element, then we have to answer whether or not it is less than 10. All numbers you get by induction have ℵo suc |

Posted: 4 Days 7 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann |

Posted: 4 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM All numbers you get by induction have ℵo successors before ω: ∀n ∈ ℕ_ind: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo . They cannot be exhausted, because they remain always there. But the set of all natural numbers exhausts also these succ |

Posted: 4 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM This one, for instance: We check the number of indexes by bijecting them with the fractions of the first column (we could use every other column or line as well). 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ... 2/1, 2/2, 2/3, 2/4, ... 3/1, 3/2, 3/3, 3/4, ... |

Posted: 4 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM Of course! But there is a slight difference. Taking a number of integers from an infinite set increases the taken set and raises the impression of some fools that finally the infinite set could be exhausted nevertheless. Contrary to that, |

Posted: 4 Days 8 Hours ago by: WM Both supply potential infinity, i.e., numbers growing larger than any given number and (positive) numbers shrinking smaller than any given positive number. But that is not the infinite of set theory, namely actual infinity. All numbers |

Posted: 4 Days 9 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm But he cannot prove: ~EXIST(a):[a e n & a < 0] LoL Dan Christensen schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022 um 15:37:51 UTC+2: |

Posted: 4 Days 9 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm But he cannot prove: ~EXIST(a):[a e n & a < 0] LoL Dan Christensen schrieb am Donnerstag, 17. März 2022 um 00:55:37 UTC+1: |

Posted: 4 Days 9 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm But he cannot prove: ~EXIST(a):[a e n & a < 0] LoL Dan Christensen schrieb am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2022 um 06:14:24 UTC+2: |

Posted: 4 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium wonderful PHYSICSOPEDIA-- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics 1 view Skip to first unread message Subscribe Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo Archimedes Plutonium 9:23 AM (6 hours ago) to I say wonderful, for a |

Posted: 4 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 4 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M. says of H.Holden Thorp SCIENCE magazine fails at math and science, imp of physics and not one single marble brain-- Apparently because he steals the science of AP and thinks Internet is just a vast stealing field of science O |

Posted: 4 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M. says of H.Holden Thorp SCIENCE magazine fails at math and science, imp of physics and not one single marble brain-- Apparently because he steals the science of AP and thinks Internet is just a vast stealing field of science O |

Posted: 4 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Why Kibo Parry M. the 30 year hate bully stalker? Because in AP's 166th book Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science by Archimedes Plutonium That AP respectfully asks Pope Franci |

Posted: 4 Days 14 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney (sets timer) 🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Imp of Math" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> tarded: WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children his broken physi |

Posted: 4 Days 15 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com No, 1 and units have strict definitions. |

Posted: 4 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium I suppose most math professors thought a "limit analysis was a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus". Which only goes to show, most math professors have little to no logical brains. A geometry proof is not a limit analysis. |

Posted: 4 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium All other physics textbooks are antique junk for they have the wrong electron with 0.5MeV particle, that is the Dirac magnetic monopole. The atom's true electron is muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. |

Posted: 4 Days 16 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of John Gabriel's fake math JG's Pathetic Daily Spam Post -- It's the SAME SHIT EVERY DAY!!! On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 11:33:19 PM UTC-4,I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel) wrote: JG here claims to |

Posted: 4 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 4 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 4 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 4 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 4 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 4 Days 18 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen I'm having too much fun kicking your butt on the simple stuff, Jan Burse. Every student can relate to these fundamental issues. No one will care if I produce a 4000 line formal proof of Zorn's Lemma or whatever. If they need an example |

Posted: 4 Days 19 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Again, even if true, it would be irrelevant. Not even you can deny that the results from basic arithmetic on N that I list in lines 1-14 and the definition of Even and Odd on N on lines 15-16 are sufficient to prove: ALL(a):[a in n => [E |

Posted: 4 Days 19 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen I'm having too much kicking your butt on the simple stuff, Jan Burse. Every student can relate to these fundamental issues. No one will care if I produce a 4000 line formal proof of Zorn's Lemma. If they need an example of power of DC P |

Posted: 4 Days 20 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Not that crap again. :( |

Posted: 4 Days 20 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Every ordered field is a formally real field, i.e., 0 cannot be written as a sum of nonzero squares. Conversely, every formally real field can be equipped with a compatible total order, that will turn it into an ordered field. (This or |

Posted: 4 Days 20 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ~EXIST(a):[a e n & a < 0] From your axioms here: common rules of basic arithmetic (line 1-14) https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm What should be the proof? Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2022 um 02:08:29 UTC+2: |

Posted: 4 Days 20 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ~EXIST(a):[a < 0] What would be the proof? Dan Christensen schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022 um 21:47:38 UTC+2: |

Posted: 4 Days 20 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium great physics textbooks--AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// only physics books that have the correct electron-- the muon// Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing// Sociology series, book |

Posted: 4 Days 20 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 4 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium 88th published book Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing// Sociology series, book 10 by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition New True Ideas in Science are very diffi |

Posted: 4 Days 21 Hours ago by: Jim Burns If it is an element we should be able to know things about it which are true of each and every element. When we state what we mean by "natural number", that is true of each natural number. A _completely true_ claim. There are many way |

Posted: 4 Days 22 Hours ago by: Flex Inukai sure, but this depopulator is saying people have to take his untested poison every 6 months. A 6 months "medicine" for a _magic_ virus never seen in the history of mankind and the planet. also, it would not surprise me, the idiot took |

Posted: 4 Days 22 Hours ago by: William Piffle. It is trivial to see that there is a bijection from any Peano set, like the integer fractions, to a proper subset. The existence of a Peoano set is guaranteed by the Axiom of Infinity. You continue to argue that the axiom |

Posted: 4 Days 22 Hours ago by: Flex Inukai so you two guys are pretending not knowing the michele obama is a man? A man as a _first_lady_. Eight years (8). You pretend you don't know you had a _first_lady_, a country image position, as a man, along a 8 years, almost a decade?? |

Posted: 4 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Xi and Putin, which books do they belong in AP's 187 published books to date? 187th published book Brain diseases due to deep-grooved electrical circuits with no off-ramps // psychology by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) format: Amazon K |

Posted: 4 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium 134th published book Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already writ |

Posted: 4 Days 23 Hours ago by: sergi o why do you require indexing of all sets of elements ? wrong, its feature is that it is an element of |N |

Posted: 4 Days 23 Hours ago by: sergi o yes, that is called a "hot swapparoo", I gave the index 5 to 1/2, but I had to get the 5 from the originally 3/17. (IAW your statement above) SO, 5 got swapparooed from 3/17 to 1/2, but now 3/17 is not indexed!! I could have "swappa |

Posted: 4 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Xi loves Russia for stealing Outer Manchuria Xi hates USA for making China rich Xi will love Russia even more if Putin steals Inner Manchuria Kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss |

Posted: 4 Days 23 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann Will wonders never cease? Taking a finite number of integers from an infinite set leaves an infinite set! Stop the presses for this amazing insight. |

Posted: 4 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium magnificent & wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic // 88th published book Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing// Sociology serie |

Posted: 4 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Magnificent and wonderful because only a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus forces all of mathematics to be rigorous and consistent. Otherwise mathematics is an insane loose marbled science which it currently is. |

Posted: 5 Days ago by: WM This is a contradiction: Every index given to a fraction is taken form an originally indexed integer fraction. Therefore the set of not indexed fractions does never decrease. Regards, WM |

Posted: 5 Days ago by: WM If it is an element we should be able to know which element it is. There is an element which is a feature of ever element? Not in |N! Regards, WM |

Posted: 5 Days ago by: casagiannoni A certain type of mathematically defined systems of semi-chaos have progressive states as represented by points on the XY coordinate plane. If random, then points would range evenly over the plane, but these systems have strong attractors |

Posted: 5 Days ago by: Dan Christensen You later changed to: ~ALL(a):[a e n & Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Even(b)]] The analysis is still the same. The counter-example in both cases is a=0: There is no natural number < 0. |

Posted: 5 Days 1 Hour ago by: Dan Christensen Still no answer? Oh, well.... Huh??? We were talking about: ~ALL(a):[a e n => (Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Odd(b))]] Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof |

Posted: 5 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 5 Days 2 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Trump illegally packed the USA Supreme Court leaving it with 7 catholics, only 2 protestants and the 300 million American citizens likely to suffer the consequences of a packed court -- 166th published book Science &Technology Supreme Court |

Posted: 5 Days 2 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson In a roundhouse to the face. LOL! ;^) |

Posted: 5 Days 2 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Trump packed the Supreme Court, illegally. Catholics make up 23% of religion in USA while Protestants make up almost the remainder. Yet the Supreme Court is 7 catholics and 2 protestants. Where 2 divided by 9 is 22%. So if Trump had been a |

Posted: 5 Days 2 Hours ago by: sobriquet We know it by mathematical induction . So given an area of, say 2, we know we can subdivide one of its constituent areas into two equal areas of 1 (the base case). Then we apply the assumption that we can further subdivide one of its two |

Posted: 5 Days 3 Hours ago by: sergi o not under all conditions... |

Posted: 5 Days 3 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden This distinction to embedding still does not hold up. Unity represented in the discrete form is not controversial. Unity upon the continuum is arbitrarily selected, from which discrete intervals can extend. However, for instance, the mete |

Posted: 5 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse In F4 its very easy to see. Since your < degenerates to a =\= b. So if you have at least two evens, like Even(0) and Even(2), this formula cannot be satisfied: ~ALL(a):[a e n & Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Even(b)]] Mostowski |

Posted: 5 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 16. Mai 2022 um 23:56:13 UTC+2: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/B_nrhs-QQ7w/m/ZmC-DZqkBwAJ Why do you ask? Dan Christensen schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022 um 17:09:49 UTC+2: |

Posted: 5 Days 5 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Please answer the question, Jan Burse. Dan |

Posted: 5 Days 5 Hours ago by: Jim Burns This is how we know what we know _for each index k_ and so on. Among what we know there are claims which describe a fraction, statements true of a fraction no matter which fraction is referred to. These claims are _complete_ in the se |

Posted: 5 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse % 13 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a e n & b e n => [a<b <=> EXIST(c):[c e n & ~c=0 & a+c=b]]] % Axiom Its only a valid definition of a < b for the natural numbers. But if the model is not the natural numbers, it is nonsense. You can check you |

Posted: 5 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm Is satisfied by F4: + 0 1 2 3 0 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 0 2 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 2 * 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 2 0 2 0 2 3 0 3 2 1 Dan Christensen schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022 um 16:42:58 UTC+2: |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Are you really claiming that there exists a natural number less than 0??? One of those "dark elements" of yours, Jan Burse? HA, HA, HA!!! Dan |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o I heard he may have also counted by 3's to infinity, but it took the same amount of time |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse What the heck? Appeal to intended model? LoL Try this model here, does it satisfy the above formula? + 0 1 2 3 0 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 0 2 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 2 * 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 2 0 2 0 2 3 0 3 2 1 I didn't check yet. But your < is |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen See my reply just now to your nearly identical posting at sci.logic Dan On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 9:58:05 AM UTC-4, Mostowski Collapse wrote: |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse What the heck? Appeal to intended model? LoL Try this here model here, does it satisfy the above formula? + 0 1 2 3 0 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 0 2 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 2 * 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 2 0 2 0 2 3 0 3 2 1 I didn't check yet. But yo |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen See my reply just now to your nearly identical posting at sci.logic. Dan On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:05:28 AM UTC-4, Mostowski Collapse wrote: |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o seems like FredJeffries has never read Newton, nor had a class on convergence, or he forgot it all. I think he misquoted Robison or did not understand it.. |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Once with each hand, or in succession? :) |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: Fritz Feldhase Indeed! Note that Chuck Norris counted to infinity - twice. |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters The second set is a proper subset of the first, and is the same size. |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters It doesn't matter! It is a feature of each and every element. |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o <snip misleading and wrong crap> |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o yes, k is an element of the set of natural numbers, k∈ N it is the one between k-1 and k+1 it is the one you stop at, to end an infinite series, so you can proclaim the rest are Darkies, |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse (In both cases, n = the set of natural numbers.) But its a lie, the n of your EvenNextOdd.htm can be anything. You also use axioms that fell from the sky like for example: 10 ~EXIST(a):[a e n & 2*a=1] Axiom https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOd |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o yep, |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse (In both cases, n = the set of natural numbers.) But its a lie, the n of your EvenNextOdd.htm can be anything. You also use axioms that fell from the sky like for example: 10 ~EXIST(a):[a e n & 2*a=1] Axiom https://dcproof.com/E |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: William The set of integer fractions, like the set N_p, like any Peano set, has cadinality aleph_0. There is no problem with this set supplying a set of indexes with cardinality aleph_0 You do not like the idea of a bijection between a set of |

Posted: 5 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergi o that is seldom required in set theory. Counting is used for sheeps and rocks. the natural numbers When applying the indexes for indexing fractions according to m/n gets the index k from Cantors Enumeration, good for you. 100% w |

Posted: 5 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Says the crank, Jan Burse, who believes he can make logical inferences about functions outside of their domains of definition where they are technically UNDEFINED. Something about his "dark elements." Dan |

Posted: 5 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Irrelevant. They are among the properties of +, -, * and < on N. Deal with it, Jan Burse. Dan |

Posted: 5 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Says the crank, Jan Burse, who believes he can make logical inferences about functions outside of their domains of definition where they are technically UNDEFINED. Something about his "dark elements." Dan |

Posted: 5 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM You said k is an elements of |N. Which is it? Regards, WM |

Posted: 5 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM Please talk to the topic. Later on we may discuss other aspects. We check the number of indexes by bijecting them with the fractions of the first column (we could use every other column or line as well). When applying the indexes for inde |

Posted: 5 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM Wrong. Abzählen is basic to set theory. It means going through the natural numbers. |

Posted: 5 Days 10 Hours ago by: Bill Monti Hida nothing. Bye. Americans fly to Ukraine to fight against the Ukrainian Nazi Azov and liberalism https://www.bitchute.com/video/XTVdnlhieOl2/ Zelensky has accused the Russian Army of shelling schools and kindergartens https://www.bitchut |

Posted: 5 Days 10 Hours ago by: Bill Monti Hida You lying nazi bitch. Americans fly to Ukraine to fight against the Ukrainian Nazi Azov and liberalism https://www.bitchute.com/video/XTVdnlhieOl2/ Zelensky has accused the Russian Army of shelling schools and kindergartens https://w |

Posted: 5 Days 10 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 14 ALL(a):ALL(b):ALL(c):[a e n & b e n & c e n & ~a=0 => [a*b<a*c => b<c]] Axiom This query tells that it works in F_4: ?- domain(A), A \== 0, domain(B), domain(C), times(A,B,X), times(A,C,Y), less(X,Y), \+ less(B,C). false. -- |

Posted: 5 Days 13 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters I fail to see how this refutes what I said. We have the real numbers because we want to use the ideas of 'convergence' and 'limit' to define our numbers. Summation is usually done one way for finite summations and another way for infin |

Posted: 5 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Dan Christensen asks when will you learn Pope Francis and Catholic Schools CATHOLIC CHURCH APOLOGY TO GALILEO IS VIA ALLOWING ABORTION + BIRTH CONTROL + ACCEPTANCE OF BIOLOGY 10 views Skip to first unread message Subscribe Archimedes P |

Posted: 5 Days 13 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters No matter, every element of N is finite. |

Posted: 5 Days 13 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse The axioms are not specific to N. Could be anything. Not a very useful example. Your Even is not even natural numbers. Means its a definition of the even natural numbers. Even F_4 satisfies your axioms? F_4 has the following addition an |

Posted: 5 Days 14 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensens fake math and science. His DC Proof examples are full of mistakes. Dan Christensen schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022 um 04:44:43 UTC+ |

Posted: 5 Days 14 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensens fake math and science. His DC Proof examples are full of mistakes. Dan Christensen schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022 um 05:54:27 UTC+2: |

Posted: 5 Days 14 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensens fake math and science. His DC Proof examples are full of mistakes. Dan Christensen schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022 um 07:40:13 UTC+2: |

Posted: 5 Days 15 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 12:22:56 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: When will you learn, Archie Poo??? AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead an |

Posted: 5 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Univ Toronto, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Univ Toronto -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent wit |

Posted: 5 Days 15 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com And what does that mean? Define it in first order logic. Meaningless garbage. You fail again |

Posted: 5 Days 15 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com No one cares what you, a crank, says. He might have been a crank. I know for certain that you are. But both of you are wrong here. |

Posted: 5 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Of course no-one can learn true math with the wrong gaggle-set of numbers-- Reals, because you cannot have a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with Reals. The true numbers have breathing space from one number to the next num |

Posted: 5 Days 16 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson |

Posted: 5 Days 16 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I have implemented it several times in different languages. For whats it worth, I am thinking about creating a new test on my fractal247 site using WebAudio along with my fractals... Might be interesting. http://fractallife247.com/tes |

Posted: 5 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Dan Christensen asking Pope Francis more than twice a day. Dan Christensen asks when will you learn Pope Francis and Catholic Schools CATHOLIC CHURCH APOLOGY TO GALILEO IS VIA ALLOWING ABORTION + BIRTH CONTROL + ACCEPTANCE OF BIOLOGY On M |

Posted: 5 Days 16 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen JG's Pathetic Daily Spam Post -- Same shit AGAIN and AGAIN! STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of John Gabriel's fake math JG here claims to have a discovered a shortcut to mastering calculus without using limits. Unfortunately for him, |

Posted: 5 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 5 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 5 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 5 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 5 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 5 Days 17 Hours ago by: sergio you can find on line calculators that will do it for you, and several different mappings too, p,q can be mapped several different ways to a single index k |

Posted: 5 Days 17 Hours ago by: sergio corrected; "A serious purpose of mathematics is to provide a conceptual framework that helps us model the real world". this one is BS; "I think that there is a real need, in formalism and elsewhere, to link our understanding of mathe |

Posted: 5 Days 17 Hours ago by: sergio and.... |

Posted: 5 Days 17 Hours ago by: David Petry Recall what I've said many times: the serious purpose of mathematics is to provide a conceptual framework that helps us reason about the real world. So, (question for Zelos), how is that different from what Robinson said? And if |

Posted: 5 Days 18 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen When will you learn, Archie Poo???? STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can |

Posted: 5 Days 18 Hours ago by: David Petry I guess I meant to write (log(1+x)-x)/x^2 = -(1/2 - x/3 + x^2/4 ... ) |

Posted: 5 Days 18 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Even if true, it would be irrelevant. Again, the axioms listed at the beginning of my proof are just some results from basic arithmetic that were required for this proof about even and odd numbers. In a formal proof, you must make every o |

Posted: 5 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 5 Days 20 Hours ago by: Jim Burns It would need to be pseudo-code, since any real-world language would face some sort of maximum condition. Apart from that, it's almost too simple. from fraction to index j = (p+q-1)*(p+q-2)/2 + p from index to fraction s = ceiling(( |

Posted: 5 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Alan Weinstein, Lauren Williams,Mariusz Wodzicki,Joseph Wolf UC Berkeley, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Berkeley -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with__ h |

Posted: 5 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, John E. Mitchell |

Posted: 5 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson |

Posted: 5 Days 21 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson [...] I am curious... Have you ever implemented Cantor's paring function in a programming language? |

Posted: 5 Days 21 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. 2i *5i *20i 0i^3 ==> Alias 20c *50c *200c = 200'000c^3 Socratis => 5i *10i *20i = 1000i^3 ========> 6i *12i * 24i = 1728i^3 |

Posted: 5 Days 21 Hours ago by: Jan Baisotei Hi, nice to meet you. Io sono communisto, how are you? Proud of me being io sono communisto. |

Posted: 5 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M says 🐒 of Math Cynthia Larive, Po-Ning Chen, Wee Liang Gan, Gerhard Gierz _UC Riverside, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. John Baez certainly cannot admit the truth, for when |

Posted: 5 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Thorp, Young, Davis steal science, while Sawat Layuheem spams all day long ahoy! Dr. Thorp, Dr. Young, Dr. Chandler Davis steal away! Fail at science, even go so far as to steal science from AP. H. Holden Thorp fails Chemistry, now |

Posted: 5 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ~ALL(a):[a e n & Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Even(b)]] Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 16. Mai 2022 um 23:56:13 UTC+2: |

Posted: 5 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ~ALL(a):[a e n & Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Even(b)]] Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 16. Mai 2022 um 23:57:50 UTC+2: |

Posted: 5 Days 22 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. 1i *5i *20i =100i^3 ==> Alias 10c *50c *200c = 100'000c^3 Socratis => 5i *10i *20i = 1000i^3 ========> 3i *6i * 12i = 216i^3 |

Posted: 5 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm ~ALL(a):[a e n & Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Even(a)]] On the same reason that your axioms are also satisfied by Z, the set of positive and negative integers. There is not a single axiom that |

Posted: 5 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm ~ALL(a):[a e n & Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Even(b)]] On the same reason that your axioms are also satisfied by Z, the set of positive and negative integers. There is not a single axiom that |

Posted: 5 Days 22 Hours ago by: Gus Asahi which country would be that?? Zero is an "even number". This big mathematician isn't knowing what a zero stands for in science and technology. And he repeatedly is using double negation, in history, like the fool he are. |

Posted: 5 Days 23 Hours ago by: Harry Soga Good point. Me too. Io sono communisto, and I'm proud of it. |

Posted: 5 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M accuses Pope Francis of attacking him. Kibo, I bet it is the medication your taking for your bully-stalking disease. Your dosage is not high enough On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 4:33:13 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: Dan Chri |

Posted: 5 Days 23 Hours ago by: William The set of indexes is N_p. No *element* of N_p can leave no 0. The *set* N_p can leave no 0. A set of elements can do something that no element of the set can. No element can be infinite. The set, N_p, like any Peano set. is infin |

Posted: 5 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M accuses Pope Francis of attacking him. Kibo, I bet it is the medication your taking for your bully-stalking disease. Your dosage is not high enough On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 4:33:13 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: Dan Chri |

Posted: 5 Days 23 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. 1i *5i *20i 0i^3 ==> Alias 10c *50c *200c = 100'000c^3 Socratis => 5i *10i *20i = 1000i^3 |

Posted: 5 Days 23 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney You *still* haven't learned not to attack me? 🤡 of Math and 🃏 of Physics Archimedes "bozo" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science: 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig P |

Posted: 5 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Dan Christensen asks when will you learn Pope Francis and Catholic Schools CATHOLIC CHURCH APOLOGY TO GALILEO IS VIA ALLOWING ABORTION + BIRTH CONTROL + ACCEPTANCE OF BIOLOGY 3m views Dan Christensen says beware of Pope Francis and the Ca |

Posted: 5 Days 23 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 5 Days 23 Hours ago by: Doctor Denkenstein "Wimin!", the Holy Ghost said, "They are to blame." http://boards.4channel.org/his/thread/13327968 https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/13327968 http://archived.moe/his/thread/13327968 [Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]1 / 0 / 1 / 2 [Update] [Auto |

Posted: 6 Days ago by: Dan Christensen Easy. 0 is an even number and no natural number is less than 0. You didn't know that, Jan Burse? Sorry, your "dark elements" don't count. Poor Jan Burse still believes that it is possible to make logical inferences about functions outsid |

Posted: 6 Days ago by: Dan Christensen Easy. 0 is an even number and no natural number is less than 0. You didn't know that, Jan Burse? Sorry, your "dark elements" don't count. Poor Jan Burse still believes that it is possible to make logical inferences about functions outsid |

Posted: 6 Days ago by: Jim Burns We know various claims about a fraction. Among what we know are some claims which describe a fraction, statements true of a fraction no matter which fraction is referred to. These claims we know are _complete_ in the sense that the are |

Posted: 6 Days 1 Hour ago by: casagiannoni A certain type of mathematically defined systems of semi-chaos have progressive states as represented by points on the XY coordinate plane. If random, then points would range evenly over the plane, but these systems have strong attractors |

Posted: 6 Days 1 Hour ago by: WM Which one is it? Regards, WM |

Posted: 6 Days 1 Hour ago by: Mostowski Collapse ~ALL(a):[a e n => (Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Odd(b))]] Dan Christensen schrieb am Montag, 16. Mai 2022 um 07:10:09 UTC+2: |

Posted: 6 Days 1 Hour ago by: Mostowski Collapse ~ALL(a):[a e n => (Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Odd(b))]] Dan Christensen schrieb am Montag, 16. Mai 2022 um 07:10:09 UTC+2: |

Posted: 6 Days 2 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Liar, k is an element of N. |

Posted: 6 Days 3 Hours ago by: FredJeffries Gentlemen, gentlemen. PLEASE. Even though you can't do something we can still obtain the result that we would get if we could do it?! What kind of silliness is that? How do we KNOW what we would get if we can't do it? Not only can't do |

Posted: 6 Days 3 Hours ago by: sergio that does not make any sense at all. So you agree that Cantor's enumeration is correct! wrong. and intentionally misleading. do you fck with your students this way ? your "argument" is 100% bullshit. yes, the cheese has slid of |

Posted: 6 Days 3 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium _wonderful PHYSICSOPEDIA-- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics 1m views// 88th published book Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing// Sociology series, book 10 by Archim |

Posted: 6 Days 3 Hours ago by: WM Please talk to the topic. Later on we may discuss other aspects. We check the number of indexes by bijecting them with the fractions of the first column (we could use every other column or line as well). When applying the indexes for in |

Posted: 6 Days 4 Hours ago by: Jim Burns We know that, for each index k, for each split BEFORE and AFTER of indices =< k, some j ends BEFORE, and j+1 begins AFTER. We know that, for each index k, there is a unique _fraction_ m/n, (m/m ≠ 2m/2n), such that m+n = ceiling((sqrt( |

Posted: 6 Days 4 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Cynthia Larive, Po-Ning Chen, Wee Liang Gan, Gerhard Gierz _UC Riverside, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. John Baez certainly cannot admit the truth, for when confronted, the churly imp trie |

Posted: 6 Days 4 Hours ago by: sergio Wrong. this is stupid wrong. |

Posted: 6 Days 4 Hours ago by: sergio wrong, k represents a natural number and is always finite, it ends a FISON. your diversion does not work. Why do you always stop at some number ? So you can say there are dark numbers out beyond that point. so why do you say |

Posted: 6 Days 4 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Succulent & wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th published book Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat ste |

Posted: 6 Days 4 Hours ago by: sergio well, that is meaningless. |

Posted: 6 Days 4 Hours ago by: sergio That is not what Cantor says at all. Wrong, the countable set is never dark. |

Posted: 6 Days 4 Hours ago by: Ross A. Finlayson Probabilities vanish, our "best guess" is probabilistic while still it's all as continuous with the limits of information and dissipation. When I learned about atoms it wasn't until much later that I learned about superstrings: as muc |

Posted: 6 Days 4 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium And that brings up another question, of whether a moderator of a newsgroup can not only moderate and decide the fate of allowing or not allowing, but the question of whether a moderator can forge a post into a moderated newsgroup. For ins |

Posted: 6 Days 5 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Dan Christensen says Re: Kibo Parry M says demonic Pope Francis and goonclod failure// AP writes: CATHOLIC CHURCH APOLOGY TO GALILEO IS VIA ALLOWING ABORTION + BIRTH CONTROL + ACCEPTANCE OF BIOLOGY On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 2:55:23 PM |

Posted: 6 Days 5 Hours ago by: WM But empty of piffle compared to set theory. Try to understand that every index used to index a non-integer fraction or an integer fraction has to be taken from an integer fraction. 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ... 2/1, 2/2, 2/3, 2/4, ... 3/1, 3 |

Posted: 6 Days 5 Hours ago by: WM At which k? k is not a number and therefore not finite. It is only a variable where infinitely many numbers can be inserted, for every number also its successor. Regards, WM |

Posted: 6 Days 5 Hours ago by: WM Wrong. We know that every index used to index a non-integer fraction or an integer fraction has to be taken from an integer fraction. That is not claimed by me. Try to understand that every index used to index a non-integer fraction or |

Posted: 6 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM They are only collectively definable. As Cantor says above: The attempt to count an uncountable set will necessarily leave a remainder. But since we never reach the end of the countable set and therefore never come to prove the remainder |

Posted: 6 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated December 25, 2014 No. 908n “On the Procedure for Establishing a Diagnosis of Human Brain Death”, https://www.europeanproceedings.com/article/10.15405/epsbs.2021.02.02. |

Posted: 6 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Well big pharma will find more brain dead in Russia, half of the population is brain dead from vodka. "Russia has a so-called opt-out system, under which all adult citizens are presumed to have given consent to their organs being donated |

Posted: 6 Days 7 Hours ago by: Cane Hino You forgot the links to the published scientific *data*, proving your point, idiot. Here we go: so true so much indeed. Time to leave that _shithole_ named _switzarland_! They steal your organs out *_B_E_F_O_R_E_* you are dead!! Amazin |

Posted: 6 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dick Ibuka You stinking "micro_penises" obsessed pedophile. Read the given *data*. The switzarlenders are stupid and fooled by the corrupt government, thinking they are to be dead when their organs, eyes, veins, etc are stolen by the *_big_pharm |

Posted: 6 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Its quite possible that comrad micro penis aka luigi is already brain death, since his posts are only incoherent bowel movements. So maybe comrad micro prenis was shelled a few years ago in Donbass and is now some vegetable in some tuSSia |

Posted: 6 Days 8 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse But mwith new neuroscience methods, there are certain new ways to determine whether a patient is in coma or brain dead? This article is from 2019: January 29, 2019; 92 (5) SPECIAL ARTICLE Brain death, the determination of brain death, an |

Posted: 6 Days 8 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse You are already brain dead micro penis, I guess you are an internet zombie without any organs, almost like an Egyptian mummy, only with a keyboard and screen as extra. LoL BTW: There is was a famous Swiss death researcher: https://en |

Posted: 6 Days 9 Hours ago by: Edwyn Sasada kak da spasiba harasho, so true indeed. Moreover, nazi "ukraine", known as *vanilla_ISIS*, is committing openly *_severe_war_crimes_*, getting nobelized in return, with eurovision *gay_homo_crap* and Nobel prizes for "peace", loads of |

Posted: 6 Days 9 Hours ago by: Billy Naito hmm, this math imbecile isn't knowing he has to be alive when his organs are stolen. I bet the big mathematicians around here, are not knowing this simple thing. "However, Frei claimed the result was skewed by people who are misinform |

Posted: 6 Days 9 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Let's start online referendum :-) https://twitter.com/CMCD048/status/1525953321755893761 LoL Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 16. Mai 2022 um 13:00:30 UTC+2: |

Posted: 6 Days 9 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Russia has a so-called opt-out system, under which all adult citizens are presumed to have given consent to their organs being donated after their death unless they sign a notarized document stating otherwise. An opt-out system has be |

Posted: 6 Days 10 Hours ago by: Codey Ogata so true so much indeed. Time to leave that _shithole_ named _switzarland_! They steal your organs out *_B_E_F_O_R_E_* you are dead!! Amazing what those *fake_money* can do with the citizens. How the fuck to live in that shithole, are |

Posted: 6 Days 11 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Actually, it has been pointed out many times that they are embeddings not strictly speaking always 'subsets'. Funny that we seem to have started discrete with naturals and integers and then fractions of wholes where they can be symboli |

Posted: 6 Days 12 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com 1 is used for the multiplicative identity element in rings. Was that so fucking hard? |

Posted: 6 Days 12 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com notice how you STILL have not been able to define what dark numbers. |

Posted: 6 Days 12 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 6 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Mark Alber, Mei-Chu Chang, Vyjayanthi Chari, Kevin Costello, _UC Riverside, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. John Baez certainly cannot admit the truth, for when confronted, the churly imp tri |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu _Rensselaer Polytech, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Rensselaer -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent w |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, Daniel Stevenson, _Rensselaer Polytech, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Rensselaer -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew _Rensselaer Polytech, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Rensselaer -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent w |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson [...] https://www.hhblife.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/CNX_Calc_Figure_11_05_002.jpg |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu _Rensselaer Polytech, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Rensselaer -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Julian S. Georg,Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, _Rensselaer Polytech, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Rensselaer -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complace |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen JG's Pathetic Daily Spam Post -- Same AGAIN and AGAIN! STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of John Gabriel's fake math On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 12:54:21 AM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel (JG), Troll Boy) wrote: When will YOU |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li,Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski _Rensselaer Polytech, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Rensselaer -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with_ |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li,Peter Kramer On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 10:56:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: Not much difference between the corrupt Donald Trump and his mindless "big lie" and Rensselaer with their mindless |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 6 Days 15 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 6 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium AP's166th book Science Supreme Court// Justice is supposed to be about Truth and fairness-- impossible in a Roberts,Barrett,Gorsuch,Alito,Kavanaugh court that is anti-science anti-biology. Abortion is a Natural World Biology law. AP' |

Posted: 6 Days 16 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to be a failure of math and |

Posted: 6 Days 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium If the Mormon Church priests can receive Divine Revelation to change their operation-- allow women and blacks to become Mormon high clergy, then, so can the Catholic Church. Pope Francis can commune and receive Divine Revelation to change |

Posted: 6 Days 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Dan Christensen commencement speech at Univ Western, Linda is away (hope she gets some vacation) On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 10:26:02 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: Dan is a salacious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse |

Posted: 6 Days 17 Hours ago by: sergio remember that movie very funny! |

Posted: 6 Days 17 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 11:00:14 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote: When will you learn, Archie Poo??? AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislea |

Posted: 6 Days 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Dan says don't be victim to Pope Francis King's Univ. College-- Western Ontario. But I think the Pope can clean up sex abuse on Catholic schools simultaneously get a Revelation from God to allow abortions and allow birth control. 0 views Sk |

Posted: 6 Days 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Dan says don't be victim to Pope Francis King's Univ. College-- Western Ontario. But I think the Pope can clean up sex abuse on Catholic schools simultaneously get a Revelation from God to allow abortions and allow birth control. Pope Fra |

Posted: 6 Days 18 Hours ago by: sergio FISON(k) |

Posted: 6 Days 18 Hours ago by: sergio Finally you agree that Cantors enumeration is 100% correct. what??? False! We do not re-use indexes here, we always use a fresh set, you can buy them on eBay $15.99 m and n and k are ALL indexes. m is column, n is row, k is seque |

Posted: 6 Days 18 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 7:34:00 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote: When will you learn, Archie Poo? AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead a |

Posted: 6 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS series of textbooks by Archimedes Plutonium// Physics with the true real electron of atoms= muon// Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science by Archimedes Plutoni |

Posted: 6 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium AP's166th book Science Supreme Court// Justice is supposed to be about Truth and fairness-- impossible in a Roberts,Barrett,Gorsuch,Alito,Kavanaugh court that is anti-science anti-biology. Abortion is a Natural World Biology law. 1 view Sub |

Posted: 6 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Pope Francis Putin's Stooge no marble brain says Kibo Parry M the 30 year nonstop bully-stalker who is likely paid for by the Catholic church to bully stalk On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 5:46:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: Chancellor G |

Posted: 6 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Chancellor Gene Block you worked in biology, can you convey to Pope Francis a Zika pandemic of microbrains would ensue. Kibo Parry M. describing Catholic church, Supreme Court as satanic, demonic, evil// While AP describes abortion in p |

Posted: 6 Days 22 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney Why do you insist on screwing up the minds of children as young as 5? Do you hate children, or just math and science? WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children his broken physics |

Posted: 6 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium It is quite plain to see that Kibo Parry M. the 30 year nonstop bully-stalker, just stalks and stalks and stalks with hate spew daily. So I went to see if Rensselaer Polytech is a Catholic school, for it would make sense that a church woul |

Posted: 6 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Hatred of biology science by the Catholic Church starts with Darwin evolution. For the Catholic Church excelled in biology with Gregor Mendel an Augustinian monk which is the Catholic Church. So, up until Darwin Evolution, the Catholic Ch |

Posted: 6 Days 22 Hours ago by: Otha Kokan nothing. The nazi switzarland is a shithole country. Proof: Russians Cancelled [RT Documentary] https://www.brighteon.com/35301233-94f1-4845-9c85-33716aa4461f |

Posted: 6 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium In my teaching mathematics series, I make it such that Math is the easiest of all the sciences to learn. I take out almost everything that impedes student learning. For this is the reason I can teach calculus in junior high school-- I remov |

Posted: 6 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Lana Del Rey - (Official Music Video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdrL3QxjyVw We can fix the fish and bicycle problem for you. Why don't you simply exchange this axiom: 16 ALL(a):[Odd(a) <=> ~Even(a)] Axiom https://dcproof.com/EvenNe |

Posted: 6 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Dan warns students not to be a victim of Pope Francis education to hate biology science On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 2:53:26 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: Kibo Parry M says struggling for relevance Pope Francis, hagfish of math and slim |

Posted: 6 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M says struggling for relevance Pope Francis, hagfish of math and slime eel of physics Roberts, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch (Kibo is the Catholic church paying you to bully stalk nonstop for 30 years?) On Sunday, May 15, |

Posted: 6 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M says fails at math & repulsive Pope Francis, Catholic Church school education, Roberts, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch (Kibo is the Catholic church paying you to bully stalk nonstop for 30 years?) On Sunday, May 15, 2022 |

Posted: 6 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium We can see where Kibo Parry M. the 30 years nonstop hate bully-stalker is coming from. As I make the case in my 166th book of Science that the USA needs a Science Supreme Court to judge on issues of science. If you look at the history of |

Posted: 6 Days 23 Hours ago by: William The internet is full of piffile. |

Posted: 6 Days 23 Hours ago by: Rod Fujioka Indeed. Amazing so many stupid people in western liberal capitalist europe. Because the zelenske is a khazar, an actor (lying for money) and a cocaine abuser etc, these people find justified paying the double/triple, for their fuel, f |

Posted: 6 Days 23 Hours ago by: Jim Burns We know that no exceptions exist. Therefore, it is A Good Thing that we can't find them. No. There is no requirement keeping numerators and denominators from also being indexes. Your fantasy-argument would make ⟨0,0⟩ impossible, s |

Posted: 6 Days 23 Hours ago by: Oscar Yoshinobu fractals, idiot. I did this as 10 years old. |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Dan joyce Ditto! Most all of Chris's work in these renderings are fascinating. It truly is an art form in a branch of complex mathematics. Dan |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Dan Christensen, as he noticed himself, has odd and even fish and bicycle. How weird is that? Dan Christensen schrieb am Dienstag, 18. Mai 2021 um 04:49:53 UTC+2: |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Dan Christensen, as he noticed himself, has odd and even fish and bicycle. How weird is that? Dan Christensen schrieb am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2022 um 21:55:23 UTC+2: |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Dan Christensen, as he noticed himself, has odd and even fish and bicycle. How weird is that? Dan Christensen schrieb am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2022 um 21:55:23 UTC+2: |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Michael Moroney Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics Archimedes "struggling for relevance" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science: Trying to brainwash kids as young as 5? How evil! WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TE |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Jim Burns We know that, for each BEFORE and AFTER of places =< k, some j ends BEFORE and j+1 begins AFTER. Can you answer your question from that? If you can't, too bad. But we still know that, for each BEFORE and AFTER of places =< k, some j e |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: WM Cantor thought: By k = (m + n - 1)(m + n - 2)/2 + m all the fractions of the sequence 1/1, 1/2, 2/1, 1/3, 2/2, 3/1, 1/4, 2/3, 3/2, 4/1, 1/5, ... are enumerated. In fact we cannot find an exception. Alas almost all fractions are not e |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: WM At which k? Regards, WM |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Listen to the Professor: https://youtu.be/k9DO26O6dIg ;^) LOL! |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science When will you learn, Archie Poo? AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can onl |

Posted: 7 Days ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 2:20:20 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote: When will you learn, Archie Poo? AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead a |

Posted: 7 Days 1 Hour ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 1:21:46 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote: When will you learn, Archie Poo?? AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead |

Posted: 7 Days 1 Hour ago by: sergio to conserve, freeze-dry King Bob. Re-hydrate when needed. |

Posted: 7 Days 2 Hours ago by: Phil Carmody Cool stuff - good work, both! Phil -- We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast aside childish remnants from the dawn of |

Posted: 7 Days 2 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Anyway, thank you again for bringing this important subject to our attention. In the Case 2 definition, in Euclid setting, you cannot prove nonsense like this: 2 fish ε pond Axiom 12 Even(fish) <=> ~Odd(fish) Iff-And, 11 Unless you h |

Posted: 7 Days 2 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse fish e pond ------------------------------------------- Even(fish) <=> ~Odd(fish)) bicycle e street ----------------------------------------------------------- ~Even(bicycle) <=> Odd(bicycle) Thats provable from your axioms here: https: |

Posted: 7 Days 2 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Fail that test and, as you would expect, you cannot determine the truth value of Even(a). It would be UNDEFINED. Deal with it, Jan Burse. Just admit you were wrong and move on. You are looking like a complete idiot here. Dan Download |

Posted: 7 Days 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 2 fish ε pond Axiom 12 Even(fish) <=> ~Odd(fish) Iff-And, 11 Unless you have pond = n also somewhere. On the other hand Dan Christensen approach, which is not a fault of Case 1 versus Case 2, but yet another fault, can make such irre |

Posted: 7 Days 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse fish e pond ------------------------------------------- Even(fish) <=> ~Odd(fish)) bicycle e street ----------------------------------------------------------- Thats provable from your axioms here: https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm E |

Posted: 7 Days 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse fish e pond ------------------------------------------- Even(fish) <=> ~Odd(fish)) bicycle e street ----------------------------------------------------------- Thats provable from your axioms here: https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm |

Posted: 7 Days 3 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Dan Christensen says -- Bend over Michael Meighen McGill Univ-- are you ready, kids?? On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 12:09:56 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: #5-1, |

Posted: 7 Days 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse a e N Or to the quantifier here: 16 ALL(a):[Odd(a) <=> ~Even(a)] Axiom https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm For example, to a fish or a bicycle. How weird is that? LMAO! Dan Christensen schrieb am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2022 um 19:09:56 UT |

Posted: 7 Days 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse LoL Dan Christensen schrieb am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2022 um 18:15:43 UTC+2: |

Posted: 7 Days 3 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen The troll, Jan Burse, with his wonky definition, is unable to distinguish between cases when Even(x) is false (e.g. when x=1) and Even(x) is undefined (e.g. when x=1/2). According to him, we should be able to determine the evenness of eve |

Posted: 7 Days 3 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium _Sergio's 22April classic rant of Standard Model of Physics and the boneheads of modern day math who cannot tell a ellipse apart from oval, and failed ignoramuses who cannot even do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, so mi |

Posted: 7 Days 3 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium 134th published book Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already writt |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: Jim Burns Each swap conserves Bob. Nonetheless... What we know is what we are talking about. We are talking about a swap k, k+1 such that for each BEFORE and AFTER =< k, some j ends BEFORE and j+1 begins AFTER. Even though each swap conserves |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Pay attention, Jan Burse. It is a theorem about the natural numbers. It makes sense on the natural numbers, the subject of the theorem. On the contrary, you must be able to distinguish cases of Even(x) being false and Even(x) being |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen It's like this, Jan Burse: We can determine the truth value of the predicate Even(x) only when x is a natural number. Otherwise, we say that that Even(x) is UNDEFINED. Even(1) would be false. See the difference? Didn't think so. Oh, well. |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: Jim Burns We, including you, know that. From knowing that, we also know all the swaps of k, k+1 leave out one of the swapped. Thus Bob is not conserved. We can claim of each swap k, k+1 that, for each split BEFORE and AFTER of =< k, some j end |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: sergio Sockenheim Switcharoofestivuster (?) |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Sockenheim? |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Yes, I agree. Keeping even open makes no sense in a ∀ ∃ - Theory. Ever seen a natural number that is not the double of a rational number? EvenQ = Q OddQ = {} So what you proved: ALL(a):[a e n => [Even(a) => Odd(a+1)]] https://dcpr |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Thank you for bringing this important subject to our attention. You have also everything applicable to this test in DC Proof: a e N Or to the quantifier here: 16 ALL(a):[Odd(a) <=> ~Even(a)] Axiom https://dcproof.com/EvenNext |

Posted: 7 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Makes no sense. The standard definition again: For every natural number, we say it is even if and only if it is a multiple of 2? On what basis do you reject it? That it can't be applied to a fish or a bicycle? Only to natural numbers? |

Posted: 7 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse a e N For example, to a fish or a bicycle. How weird is that? Dan Christensen schrieb am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2022 um 17:18:13 UTC+2: |

Posted: 7 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergio wrong, you stopped at k again. now you say you are working with finite sets. dark to you, vast regions of math are dark to you. |

Posted: 7 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergio wrong, your swaparoofest to deceive shows you are entirely out of math. google Cantors Enumeration that is the correct way to do it. *by your own admission your way always fails*. |

Posted: 7 Days 5 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann [...] [...] Bullshit. The flawed English gives away the sock puppet, if the rest of the idiocy wasn't enough to go by. Fuck off, you narcissistic psychopath. |

Posted: 7 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[a e n => [Even(a) => Odd(a+1)]] You can only extend it to EvenZ and OddZ: ALL(a):[a e n => [EvenZ(a) => OddZ(a+1)]] But this works already not anymore: ALL(a):[a e n => [EvenQ(a) => OddQ(a+1)]] The problem is unlike the Peano ax |

Posted: 7 Days 5 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Definition: For any natural number, we say that it is EVEN if and only if it is a multiple of 2. Poor Jan Burse rejects this standard definition. Why? Because it cannot be applied, for example, to a fish or a bicycle. Just to be contrary |

Posted: 7 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergio |

Posted: 7 Days 5 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen In your example here, the standard definition of evenness on the natural numbers is applicable ONLY to the natural numbers, not, as you would have it, for everything in the universe: ALL(a):[a in N => [Even(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b in n & a=2* |

Posted: 7 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM Found in the internet: What if countability is inconsistent? (adopted from Mueckenheim): If the fractions m/n are enumerated by the natural numbers k according to Cantor's function k = (m + n - 1)(m + n - 2)/2 + m then all the fractions |

Posted: 7 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM I wrote: "For each place with a swap into it, there is a swap out of it. Never all swaps are completed."This means potential infinity. In potential infinity! If Bob cannot be eliminated then he can only be in the dark. Regards, WM |

Posted: 7 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM There is not enough ink to decribe more than the unjustified belief. All that happens in a distance of ℵo from ω. Uninteresting. All that happens in a distance of ℵo from ω. Uninteresting. Then it is in a distance of ℵo from |

Posted: 7 Days 9 Hours ago by: William Piffle |

Posted: 7 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium wonderful PHYSICSOPEDIA-- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics 1 view Skip to first unread message Subscribe Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo Archimedes Plutonium 9:23 AM (6 hours ago) to I say wonderful, for a |

Posted: 7 Days 12 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 125 ALL(a):[~a ε n => ~Even(a)] Conclusion, 114 Here is the full proof: See here: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.logic/c/gV50jEU6fvQ/m/ncKE65R2AgAJ Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2022 um 09:46:36 UTC+2: |

Posted: 7 Days 13 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse You are promoting non-well defined definitions with your UNDEFINED nonsense. Lets take a closer look at even natural numbers, how do they look like? According to Dan Christensen Case 1 type definition: { ... dark elements ..., 0, 2, 4, . |

Posted: 7 Days 13 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Students Beware: Dan Christensen is the crank who doesn't understand how to define Even = even natural numbers. Dan Christensen schrieb am Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 um 22:00:47 UTC+1: |

Posted: 7 Days 13 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 125 ALL(a):[~a ε n => ~Even(a)] Conclusion, 114 Here is the full proof: See here: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.logic/c/gV50jEU6fvQ/m/ncKE65R2AgAJ Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2022 um 09:17:09 UTC+2: |

Posted: 7 Days 13 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ~Even(-1) What are you bragging about? Dan Christensen schrieb am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2022 um 02:35:31 UTC+2: |

Posted: 7 Days 13 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Students Beware: Dan Christensen is the crank who doesn't understand how to define Even even natural numbers. Dan Christensen schrieb am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2022 um 07:00:26 UTC+2: |

Posted: 7 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Amy Barrett room for 938 Zika babies in her home, is that true Kibo Parry M.. On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: No wonder |

Posted: 7 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Chancellor Gene Block you worked in biology, can you convey to Pope Francis what a Zika pandemic of microbrains could ensue and even worse a covid-19 microcephaly could ensue. Catholic church, Supreme Court as satanic, demonic, evil// Wh |

Posted: 7 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Chancellor Gene Block you worked in biology, can you convey to Pope Francis a Zika pandemic of microbrains would ensue. Kibo Parry M. describing Catholic church, Supreme Court as satanic, demonic, evil// While AP describes abortion in pur |

Posted: 7 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Chancellor Gene Block you worked in biology, can you convey to Pope Francis a Zika pandemic of microbrains would ensue. UCLA,Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, UCLA, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, n |

Posted: 7 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, |

Posted: 7 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M says diabolical on Pope Francis. AP arguing wonderous PHYSICSOPEDIA-- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science by Archimed |

Posted: 7 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Catholic church, Supreme Court as satanic, demonic, evil// While AP describes abortion in purely biological terms-- we need it for viral pandemics such as Zika, and now Covid-19. Re: satanic MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of O |

Posted: 7 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M. says demonic Pope Francis. Why Kibo? AP is arguing for biology not anti-abortion in his books wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium// Science &Technology |

Posted: 7 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M, the 30 year nonstop bully stalker paid by organizations to hate spew. Re: satanic MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math//Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural la |

Posted: 7 Days 15 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 7 Days 15 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen JG's Pathetic Daily Spam Post -- Same AGAIN and AGAIN! STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of John Gabriel's fake math On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:44:43 PM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel (JG), Troll Boy) wrote: When will Y |

Posted: 7 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M says demonic Pope Francis and goonclod failure. On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:45:58 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"goonclod failure of science" > fails at math and science: > demonic Kibo Parry M on evil Pope Francis, hea |

Posted: 7 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M says demonic Pope Francis and goonclod failure. On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:45:58 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"goonclod failure of science" > fails at math and science: > demonic Kibo Parry M on evil Pope Francis, hea |

Posted: 7 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 7 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 7 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 7 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 7 Days 17 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 7 Days 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium I was looking for abortion in the Animal kingdom. There is much data on farm animals, but little in the wild. I was surprised to see that in humans, a Natural Abortion is called a miscarriage. Not surprised at all except for the frequency. |

Posted: 7 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium So here I am looking to see if a Catholic school education hinders, thwarts and decline in science achievement. I see that way back to 1963 with John Eccles winning the Nobel in Medicine and Physiology. And for physics, other than 2007 wit |

Posted: 7 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 7 Days 19 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Rensselaer Polytech, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Rensselaer -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent w |

Posted: 7 Days 19 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M says demonic Pope Francis and goonclod failure. On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:45:58 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: Kibo Parry M on evil Pope Francis, head of Catholic church with Kibo Parry M 30 year nonstop stalking. As |

Posted: 7 Days 19 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M says demonic Pope Francis and goonclod failure. On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:45:58 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: Kibo Parry M on evil Pope Francis, head of Catholic church with Kibo Parry M 30 year nonstop stalking. |

Posted: 7 Days 19 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M on evil Pope Francis, head of Catholic church with Kibo Parry M 30 year nonstop stalking. As a Naval Officer I pledged to "not lie,cheat, or steal, and not tolerate those that do". In modern times with Internet and stalkers lik |

Posted: 7 Days 20 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen So Even(1/2) would be false by this wonky definition. Better to stick to the conventional definition: ALL(a):[a in n => [Even(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b in n & a=2*b]]] Then Even(1/2) would not simply be false, it would be undefined since the d |

Posted: 7 Days 20 Hours ago by: Dan joyce Thanks Mike |

Posted: 7 Days 20 Hours ago by: Dan joyce No, I am just wondering why it gives a different resulting equation when the amounts are switched e for pi and phi for e e = phi*w*h, e^2 = phi^2 + w^2 + h^2 It does not give the correct answer. |

Posted: 7 Days 21 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen I will stick to the more conventional definition with none of your wonky "dark elements." Get a life, Jan Burse! Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com |

Posted: 7 Days 22 Hours ago by: Jim Burns Yes. For each place with a swap into it, there is a swap out of it. And, after all swaps, Bob is not at any place with a swap out of it. Where is Bob, after all swaps? He's not at any place with a swap into it, because there's a swap |

Posted: 7 Days 22 Hours ago by: sergio you are out of math, with your swaparoo swapfestable nonsense. use Equations, if you know math. |

Posted: 7 Days 22 Hours ago by: sergio wrong. Sets do not change. if you change one element, you have a different set. finite or infinite doesn't matter, sets do not change. you are outside of math. |

Posted: 7 Days 23 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 15 ALL(a):[Even(a) <=> a ε n & EXIST(b):[b ε n & a=2*b]] Axiom 16 ALL(a):[Odd(a) <=> a ε n & ~EXIST(b):[b ε n & a=2*b]] Axiom As predicted, the theorem is also provable: 113 ALL(a):[a ε n => [Even(a) => Odd(a+1)]] Rem DNeg, 112 T |

Posted: 7 Days 23 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 13 ALL(a):ALL(b):[a<b <=> a ε n & b ε n & EXIST(c):[c ε n & ~c=0 & a+c=b]] Axiom You can then prove the lemma as well: 78 ALL(a):[a ε n => ~EXIST(b):[b ε n & 2*a+1=2*b]] Conclusion, 17 For a full proof look here: https://groups. |

Posted: 7 Days 23 Hours ago by: Jim Burns All swaps are described, right at the beginning. Then, all swaps are reasoned about. Any conclusion applies to all swaps. All swaps are between places j and j+1. No swap loses Bob or loses any X. Assume that Bob gets to place k. ⟨1, |

Posted: 7 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Is the Beal Bank as corrupt as Andrew Beal-- still teaches a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when in truth that is a oval. Of what does it profit Andrew Beal for a Generalized FLT when Andrew cannot even tell the difference between a |

Posted: 7 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Is the Beal Bank as corrupt as Andrew Beal-- still teaches a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when in truth that is a oval. Of what does it profit Andrew Beal for a Generalized FLT when Andrew cannot even tell the difference between a |

Posted: 8 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Rensselaer Polytech, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Rensselaer -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with_ |

Posted: 8 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium John Roberts, is Rensselaer a Catholic school that should be teaching Creationism, and not Darwin Evolution also? I know they teach ellipse is a conic when actually it is a oval. Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked |

Posted: 8 Days ago by: WM Infinite sets change unless they contain dark elements. Regards, WM |

Posted: 8 Days ago by: WM And never can complete all swaps. And therefore it is not all swaps. For each place with a swap into it, there is a swap out of it. Never all swaps are completed. But a state after "all swaps" doesn't exist. In the same way as he |

Posted: 8 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Does the Catholic Church and Supreme Court use this Boston open hate spew channel to telephone in to harass and pester AP? |

Posted: 8 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 8 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 8 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium How much is the 30 year stalker hate channel-- Michael Moroney, how much is gay hatred, Catholic Church hatred, NSF Panchanathan hatred, perhaps even the Pope and USA Supreme Court using the hate spew channel that is Michael Moroney. How |

Posted: 8 Days 1 Hour ago by: William Piffle, A "potentially infinite" set is nonsense. Sets do not change. |

Posted: 8 Days 1 Hour ago by: Elgie Satoh Plutonium the nazis arming the nazis, with tanks etc. You? For you the nazis have a vaccine. The Covid Psyop Rolls On - Some NWO Plans Finishing Us Off https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=MARHM23DSKA2 Life in Third Reich - When the |

Posted: 8 Days 1 Hour ago by: Barry Schwarz snip Which raises the question: Are you interested in learning how to solve these types or problems or are you interested in learning how to use Wolfram? |

Posted: 8 Days 2 Hours ago by: Mike Terry I don't use Wolfram, but maybe it doesn't understand phi without help? When I try phi = (1+sqrt(5))/2, e = phi*w*h, e^2 = phi^2 + w^2 + h^2 it gets the numerical values of w,h above, although its "exact form" solution is rather mysteri |

Posted: 8 Days 2 Hours ago by: Dan joyce Mike Entering it in Wolfram ---- e = phi*w*h, e^2 = phi^2 + w^2 + h^2 It calculates in a different manner then pi=e*w*h,pi^2= e^2+w^2+h^2 Try in Wolfram --- e = phi*w*h, e^2 = phi^2 + w^2 + h^2 It does not give the proper amounts for |

Posted: 8 Days 2 Hours ago by: Jim Burns <WM<JB>> </WM<JB>> Each swap that Bob makes never can empty a place. For each place with a swap into it, there is a swap out of it. After all swaps, there are only places Bob never came to, and places Bob has left. Where is Bob? Afte |

Posted: 8 Days 3 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 8 Days 3 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 8 Days 3 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen The wonky bits about "dark elements" are left out of Case 1. So why include them? Dan |

Posted: 8 Days 3 Hours ago by: Mike Terry So our equations are e = φ*w*h, e^2 = φ^2 + w^2 + h^2 ? It's similar - we have wh = e/φ (W+h)^2 = w^2 + h^2 + 2wh = e^2 - φ^2 + 2e/φ so w+h = sqrt(e^2 - φ^2 + 2e/φ) // note positive root only |

Posted: 8 Days 4 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 8 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergio remember the 5 year plans? where the Gov ordered you what to plant and grow, on land you could not own ? Summing up the work of the Second Congress, of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party the following conclusions may be drawn: |

Posted: 8 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergio totally wrong. when you make a serious mistake, and everyone knows it, you should fess up, and admit your mistake. That is what honest men do. Your ego cannot defend your bad math in refusing Cantors Enumeration. You are wrong. |

Posted: 8 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergio Compliment of a set ? what is the compliment of {1,2,17.31} ? Wrong. When one element is taken out, the set is gone. It has been changed into a different set. "always wrong" WM. (AWWM) |

Posted: 8 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergio So you are saying *it is not the same as subtraction*. wrong quote, if you take a number out of a set of natural numbers, it is not the set of natural numbers anymore. which says if you change a set using an operator, it is not tha |

Posted: 8 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergio boring and trivial. |

Posted: 8 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM Then try mathematics: ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵ₀. Regards, WM |

Posted: 8 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM The set is finite (potentially infinite) because its complement is actually infinite. I know that you don't trust mathematics, but this is fact: ∀n ∈ ℕ_p: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵ₀. And the set is not more than all its el |

Posted: 8 Days 6 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen I don't know where you got that silly idea, Jan Burse. If you think you can make your wonky definition of evenness work, I invite you to try to prove ALL(a):[a in N => [Even(x) => Odd(x+1)]]. I am not motivated to do so, what with its sil |

Posted: 8 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM Of course. The only difference is that the result cannot get negative. Semikontinua genannt habe, lassen sich gewissermaßen durch Addition und Subtraktion aus perfekten Punktmengen (Cantor) Es sind dies die Operationen welche ich in e |

Posted: 8 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM In order to release you from Bob, go the other way round. Let all integer fractions be indexed. Then distribute the indices according to Cantor over the whole matrix, staring at the upper left corner. Recognize that you must fail because |

Posted: 8 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM If you insist on this then there are never all swaps. If you insist on this then there are never all swaps. Otherwise there are many dark places where Bob can hang around. Look, If someone says that he is collecting all elements but wh |

Posted: 8 Days 7 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium I was looking at whether the 5 conservative justices had any science background, and science to guide them in decision making for it is science that drives modern day social life. I find that Chief Justice Roberts father was an electrical |

Posted: 8 Days 7 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math//Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science by Archimedes Plutonium 1 view Subscribe Archimedes Plutonium's profile pho |

Posted: 8 Days 7 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium wonderful PHYSICSOPEDIA-- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics 1 view Skip to first unread message Subscribe Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo Archimedes Plutonium 9:23 AM (6 hours ago) to I say wonderful, for |

Posted: 8 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan joyce Thanks Barry. |

Posted: 8 Days 8 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Big italian family with everybody under one roof? Paleotic hunters and gatherers that are not anymore nomads? Mostowski Collapse schrieb: |

Posted: 8 Days 8 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann [..] Yes and yes. This is getting too boring. EOD |

Posted: 8 Days 8 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse I guess elderly persons and school children, not sure about home working wifes, does she sell her labor, are indeed non-proletariat: Karl Marx described the working class as the "proletariat", and that it was the working class who ultima |

Posted: 8 Days 8 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse What about an elderly person. Or a school child. Who does put the food on their table? And since they dont "work", do they belong to the non-proletariat? Audie Mutsu schrieb: |

Posted: 8 Days 8 Hours ago by: Audie Mutsu This brainfart imbecile wannabe capitalist, named "sergio", still not understanding the proletariat are putting food on his table. And that there are no "two classes". You fucking idiot. |

Posted: 8 Days 10 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse The funny thing about the whole endeavour, its still the ultimate freak show, since Dan Christensen never asked whether Case 2 => Case 1, which obviously holds, since we have: ∀x(Ex ↔ (Nx ∧ Dx)) → ∀x(Nx → (Ex ↔ Dx)) is vali |

Posted: 8 Days 12 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 15 ALL(a):[a e n => [Even(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b e n & a=2*b]]] Axiom Cannot be proved from: 15 ALL(a):[Even(a) <=> a e n & EXIST(b):[b e n & a=2*b]] Axiom Dan Christensen schrieb am Samstag, 14. Mai 2022 um 04:55:38 UTC+2: |

Posted: 8 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Will Donald Trump kiss the head of a Zika baby in 2024 campaign//Roberts,Alito,Barrett,Gorsuch,Kavanaugh// when Zika babies have almost no head?? Failures of biology, failures of Logic- Barrett,Roberts,Alito,Kavanaugh,Gorsuch, making pregn |

Posted: 8 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Princeton Univ,Christopher Skinner, Allan Sly, Elias Stein, Zoltán Szabó, Terence Tao Princeton Univ, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Princeton -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of |

Posted: 8 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math//Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science by Archimedes Plutonium wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistake |

Posted: 8 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Re: 9-Andrew Wiles and his fake FLT proof, so dumb on FLT he could not even spot Euler's flaw of exp 3 FLT, and so dumb as a mathematician, he never could do a geometry proof of calculus, FTC. by ross.pro...@gmx.com Jul 12, 2021, 4:36 |

Posted: 8 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Harvey Friedman, Christian Friesen, Ulrich Gerlach, Robert Gold Ohio State Univ, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. OSU -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with |

Posted: 8 Days 14 Hours ago by: Barry Schwarz Complicated perhaps (in the eye of the beholder) but definitely real and not complex. The same analysis with the new values shows that the two missing sides have lengths of 2.019682 and 0.831809. These are the values produced by the ex |

Posted: 8 Days 14 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta The deluded moron followers of Cantor reasoned that subtracting infinity from another infinity is the same as removing part of an infinite set, in other words, the result can be infinite if the set removed is smaller [the fucking idiots o |

Posted: 8 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Christopher Skinner, Allan Sly, Elias Stein, Zoltán Szabó, Terence Tao Princeton Univ, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Princeton -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __co |

Posted: 8 Days 14 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Georg Cantor was a mentally disturbed self-confessed Jew who was born in Russia and died in Germany. His claim to fame is the observation that certain sets can be systematically named or listed. This observation became the basis for his b |

Posted: 8 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium AP: Kibo, is Donald Trump going to kiss the Zika babies in the campaign trail? Kibo: Yes, Barrett, Alito, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Roberts pleaded with Don to kiss the Zika babies, for the young pregnant woman went full term to avoid being cla |

Posted: 8 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Univ Western Ontario, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. UWO -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with__ hate-stalker criminals of Kibo Parry M. or Jan Burse or |

Posted: 8 Days 16 Hours ago by: Dan joyce Mike, Here is a different one I entered on Wolfram alpha but this time using the golden ratio phi ---- e = phi*w*h, e^2 = phi^2+w^2+h^2 replacing pi with e and e with phi. Don't get this one at all. Complex, for sure. |

Posted: 8 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, Rensselaer Polytech, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Rensselaer -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent |

Posted: 8 Days 17 Hours ago by: sergio these are deep problems for dark numbers. How many people that glance at a 0, actually think "that is a 0" ? hardly any. do all 0's look the same ? How long does it take to rap,( tap, barcode, color of the rainbow, flashing light) a |

Posted: 8 Days 17 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of John Gabriel's fake math JG's Pathetic Daily Spam Post On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 10:46:16 PM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel (JG), Troll Boy) wrote: When will YOU learn, Troll Boy? JG h |

Posted: 8 Days 18 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 8 Days 18 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 8 Days 18 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 8 Days 18 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 8 Days 18 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 8 Days 19 Hours ago by: sergio excellent drawings, how do you do the 3D effect ? lighting, or is it some parts shadowing others ? |

Posted: 8 Days 20 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Ursula Keller,Joel Mesot, ETH Zurich ETH, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Dartmouth -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with__ hate- |

Posted: 8 Days 20 Hours ago by: William Indeed. every *element* of N_p is finite. The *set* N_p is infinite. No single *element* of N_p. would "resist". So what? The fact that every *element* of N_p would not resist says nothing about whether the *set* N_p would "resi |

Posted: 8 Days 21 Hours ago by: sergio that is what happens with commies, they split into two classes the proletariat scum, and the Friends of the Central Committee. Rich and Poor. What killed communism was trying to set prices for everything by remote bureaucrats. |

Posted: 8 Days 21 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse "A paleo diet is a dietary plan based on foods similar to what might have been eaten during the Paleolithic era, which dates from approximately 2.5 million to 10,000 years ago. A paleo diet typically includes lean meats, fish, fruits, |

Posted: 8 Days 21 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters That works for integers too, bonus! Mostowski Collapse has brought this to us : |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters So, set difference is the same as subtraction? No wonder your set of natural numbers is growing and shrinking so much. |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Infinitely *many* FISONs can be indexed by the infinitely *many* natural numbers. Don't fall into his trap about infinite finite things and finitely infinite things. :) |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mike Terry alternatively.. we have the WH and W+H (constant) values, so straight away W and H are the two roots of the quadratic x^2 - (W+H)x + (WH) = 0 i.e. x^2 - (pi^2 - e^2)x + pi^2/e^2 = 0 and we can use our favourite quadratic formula |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: Dan joyce Nice complex shapes. |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: Norge Yasui How can North Korea be pure communism?? That's why is been said, go read Marx's "Capitalism" so you know more about it. The farmers for instance, had/have own houses etc, also apartments in cities and summer houses in the mountains. T |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Dark number time 0... Oh shit zero is no longer dark... Have you ever thought about zero? If so, how long did it take you to think about it. Time is now introduced. ;^) |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: sergio DPKR had a great website at one time, they have been working on new one, cannot find the old one, that was 1950's commies. https://korea-dpr.com/ (still has batsht crazy commie books on it, see below) https://dprktoday.com/ "In |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson The two square roots definitely remind me of choosing roots in a reverse iteration Julia set. Check this out, the main equations are from me: http://paulbourke.net/fractals/multijulia Paul was nice enough to experiment with it, and ded |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Are you potentially wrong? |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Why not? Infinite FISON's can handle infinite natural numbers... Right? |

Posted: 8 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Is that true in North Korea? I am thinking about 100% pure communism. Not a hybrid. Am I still wrong? Sorry if I am. ;^o |

Posted: 8 Days 23 Hours ago by: sergio there is! your beeps, flashes, raps daffynition of "definable" is the border wrong, potential infinity means finite, all finites have an end. |

Posted: 8 Days 23 Hours ago by: Jim Burns Any place that Bob cannot swap _into_ is not where Bob is after all swaps. Any place that Bob can swap _out of_ is not where Bob is after all swaps. Describe a place which Bob can swap into. From that description, we know that any p |

Posted: 8 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium AP: Kibo why are they so anti-science? I mean, there is barely a single sign of coherent logic in all of the Roberts court starting with Citizen's United, John Roberts makes bribery be defined as acts of free speech, had Roberts even ever h |

Posted: 8 Days 23 Hours ago by: Floyd Shimedzu Nonsense, all I know from eastern europe had own houses, cars etc. Worked in own business, not state etc. You are making bullshit. |

Posted: 8 Days 23 Hours ago by: Dan joyce Nice. Here is another interesting one where e has length and width or height and the inner space diagonal is the same as the volume. 3.879925 = e*w*h,3.879925^2 = e^2+w^2+h^2 |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko, Terence Tao UCLA UCLA, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. UCLA -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with__ hate-stalker |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Mostowski Collapse This theorem was included in a web listing of the "top 100 mathematical theorems", dating from 1999, which later became used by Freek Wiedijk as a benchmark set to test the power of different proof assistants. As of 2021, the proof of |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: WM There is no fixed border between definable nd dark. There is no end to potential infinity. Regards, WM |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Mostowski Collapse Euclid proved that 2^(p−1=(2^p − 1) is an even perfect number whenever 2^p − 1 is prime. This is the final result on number theory in Euclid's Elements; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid%E2%80%93Euler_theorem LoL Mostowski C |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: sergio you snipped Cantor. |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: WM Wrong. You like to support magic. Fact is that you are in the position of a man who has collected some elements and claims to collect all the rest, but every time when he collects one element, he drops another element. So he will never |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: sergio Liar. or provide a proof that natural number k is not in any FISONs Liar. or provide a proof that natural number k is not in Endsegment(k). |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Mostowski Collapse ~EXIST(b):[a=b+b] => EXIST(c):[a=c+c+1] How would this work? I came up already with one step. Namely trying to show: ALL(b):ALL(c):[b+b =\= c+c+1] There are two cases: Case 1: b=<c, then you can use subtraction and get: 0 =\= (c-b)+(c |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: sergio no Clintus, that is capitalism, communism, political and economic doctrine that aims to replace private property and a profit-based economy with public ownership and communal control of at least the major means of production (e.g., mi |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Jim Burns That seems to be at the core of our discussion. I expect to be returning to my answer again and again, so I've cleaned up my writing as best I could. ---- Start Bob at 1. OXXXXX... Exchange 1 and 2. No empty place. XOXXXX... Exchange |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Frances Kirwan, Terry J.Lyons, Ben Green, Roger Penrose Math con-artists of conic sections Andrew Wiles, Frances Kirwan, Terry J.Lyons, Ben Green, Roger Penrose. Why not come clean on your gross error and mistake for a single cone has 1 ax |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: WM No. No. Regards, WM |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Mostowski Collapse Yes, we are possibly not yet at a faithful translation of Euclid, since Euclid had possibly only the positive natural numbers in mind, and then this phrase here: 6. An even number is that which is divisible into two equal parts. 7. An odd |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: WM I am removing elements from a set. A \ B is possible. Cantor does it too: wir könnten sie alsdann von S entfernen, ohne daß diese Menge dadurch die in 2) ausgedrückte Beziehung zu M verliert. Regards, WM |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: WM There is no time in mathematics. It means that for every element we can find its position with respect to the other elements in the given order. That is what we mean by Element für Element (Cantor) aufeinander abzählen lassen. (Cantor |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Failures of biology, failures of Logic- Barrett,Roberts,Alito,Kavanaugh,Gorsuch, making pregnant Zika women to be criminals. Roberts court is a illogical kangaroo court and he wants to saddle all Americans with his anti-science 0 views Skip |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: FromTheRafters Naturals w/zero only. |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner Dartmouth College, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Dartmouth -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring o |

Posted: 9 Days ago by: Davee Okuda You talk like an *_EinsatzgruppenFuhrer_*. |

Posted: 9 Days 1 Hour ago by: Clint Ochiai Can't be like that, it never been. You own your house, your garden, your house territory, your animals, the food you grow, your car etc. Ask the east europeans. |

Posted: 9 Days 1 Hour ago by: FromTheRafters That would be a proper subset, not a single element. You could use the initial element to satisfy this trivially since it has no predecessor. Again, you are not removing them from a set but only choosing between removing them, or not r |

Posted: 9 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel, Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling Caltech Univ, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Caltech -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with__ hate-stalk |

Posted: 9 Days 1 Hour ago by: Chris M. Thomasson For some reason I thought it was "Public" in the sense of the commune. |

Posted: 9 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Tomas Arias, Jim Alexander, Ivan Bazarov, Eberhard Bodenschatz Cornell Univ, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Cornell -- truth always wins and your actions of hiring or complacent with stalk |

Posted: 9 Days 1 Hour ago by: Mostowski Collapse You still sound totally confused. So why did you ask why this is not provable? Dan Christensen schrieb am Freitag, 13. Mai 2022 um 18:15:20 UTC+2: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.logic/c/gV50jEU6fvQ/m/Y4I0ke72AQAJ Dan Christensen schrie |

Posted: 9 Days 1 Hour ago by: Dan Christensen And that is a good thing! In the standard definition, you can only determine the evenness of a natural number. Unfortunately for you, Jan Burse, there are no "dark elements" in DC Proof. Maybe you can write your own proof checker that ca |

Posted: 9 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Emil Theodor Kocher, Kurt Wuthrich, Daniel Vassella it is so much easier for Univ Bern and ETH to admit the truth-- slant cut in single cone is oval, never the ellipse than to hire a goonclod stalker of Jan Burse to stalk anti-science. Is t |

Posted: 9 Days 2 Hours ago by: sergio T24gNS8xMy8yMDIyIDEyOjQ4IFBNLCBUaW1vdGh5IEdvbGRlbiB3cm90ZToNCj4gT24gVGh1 cnNkYXksIE1heSAxMiwgMjAyMiBhdCAzOjU1OjM0IFBNIFVUQy00LCBzZXJnaW8gd3JvdGU6 DQo+PiBPbiA1LzEyLzIwMjIgMjozNCBQTSwgVGltb3RoeSBHb2xkZW4gd3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4g T24gVGh1cnNkYXksIE1he |

Posted: 9 Days 2 Hours ago by: Jim Burns Agreed, very neat, not that I helped build Wolfram Alpha or anything. The 4 roots are trivial variations of each other. h₀=0.888927..., w₀=1.30014... h=h₀, w=w₀ h=-h₀, w=-w₀ h=w₀, w=h₀ h=-w₀, w=-h₀ The good news |

Posted: 9 Days 2 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse In Dans approach this formula: ALL(a):[Evenness(a) => Oddness(Successness(a))] Is then violated by a= -1, which gives: Evenness(-1) => Oddness(Successness(-1)) Since the counter model has Sucessness(-1)=0, we basically make use th |

Posted: 9 Days 2 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden You could try: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfMwXsWbvuk When was the cold war with Russia reignited? 2016 begins an era. On the numerical front: Values such as 0.333... seem to be accepted by mathematicians while a value such as 333. |

Posted: 9 Days 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Easy, there is this counter model: Evenness(-1) /* possible */ Sucessness(-1)=0 /* possible Why does this counter model work? Because from this here: Axiom: CASE 1 ALL(a):[a in n => [Evenness(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b in n & a=2*b]]] Axi |

Posted: 9 Days 3 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann It does *NOT*! All it means is that n < m iff f(n) < f(m). It does *NOT* mean that f(n) has to be constructed before f(m). You really have *NO CLUE* about *ANYTHING*. I would recommend that *YOU* learn German, if you had not demonstrated |

Posted: 9 Days 3 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann Shut the fuck up, moron, about things you do not understand. *EVERY* natural number is an element of a FISON, and *EVERY* natural number defines an end segment of cardinality aleph_0. |

Posted: 9 Days 3 Hours ago by: sergio "remove" is not the right word, as you have changed the set N_p into something else. wrong, {17,2,3} is a set defined by natural numbers. there is no such thing as your "definable" number, which requires two people a rapping, tappin |

Posted: 9 Days 3 Hours ago by: sergio T24gNS8xMy8yMDIyIDExOjU1IEFNLCBXTSB3cm90ZToNCj4gaG9yYW5kLi4uLkBnbWFpbC5j b20gc2NocmllYiBhbSBEb25uZXJzdGFnLCAxMi4gTWFpIDIwMjIgdW0gMTc6NDE6MzEgVVRD KzI6DQo+PiBPbiBUaHVyc2RheSwgMTIgTWF5IDIwMjIgYXQgMTE6MDg6MzIgVVRDLTMsIFdN IHdyb3RlOg0KPj4+IGhvc |

Posted: 9 Days 3 Hours ago by: Dutch Sakakibara NARRATIVE LOST https://www.bitchute.com/video/E8z9kR8v5tNd/ |

Posted: 9 Days 3 Hours ago by: WM Together with all its predecessors! There are no other sets defined by natural numbers. Every FISON is finite. No definable natural number is outside of a FISON. Which n would resist? Every n that can be counted can be removed. What w |

Posted: 9 Days 3 Hours ago by: WM Try to learn German. "Unter beidseitiger Wahrung der Rangfolge" means one after the other in the given order. "nacheinander die verschiedenen endlichen ganzen Zahlwerte 1, 2, 3, ..., ν, ... anzunehmen". Try to recover. Cantor, Colle |

Posted: 9 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Your claim. Let's see your formal proof, Jan Burse. Because the quantifier is not restricted to the natural numbers here and in your daffynition of evenness. A foolish mistake on your part, Jan Burse. Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 free |

Posted: 9 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan joyce You can say that again. Way over my head. |

Posted: 9 Days 5 Hours ago by: Dan joyce Yes, I refer to that as the inner space diagonal as being pi and also the volume being pi if the length is e Jim and Barry set me straight on finding width and height. Jim entered this equation into Wolfram --- pi = e*w*h, pi^2 = e^2+w^2 |

Posted: 9 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergio wow! that is neat!! has 4 roots and exact solutions are very complex, |

Posted: 9 Days 5 Hours ago by: Dan joyce That is neat. Thanks Dan |

Posted: 9 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ATOM TOTAL FAILURE LoL Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 11. April 2022 um 20:11:51 UTC+2: |

Posted: 9 Days 6 Hours ago by: Jacy Kagabu https://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/uncle-adolf-1536x860.jpg |

Posted: 9 Days 6 Hours ago by: Johan Takudome ∆x'∆t/∆t' + ∆x∆x'^2/c^2∆t'^2 = ∆x + ∆x ∆'t/∆t' [5] |

Posted: 9 Days 8 Hours ago by: Joedy Takudo I would rather send a letter to aioe.org to lift the ban for posting in sci.physics.relativity. Just tell the truth, that the homepage_designer thomas pointedhead is an uneducated, uncivilized wanker. Only the truth. If I were you. |

Posted: 9 Days 11 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Daher ist uns Bruch 1/(1+a) gleich dieser unendlichen Reihe 1-a+aa-aaa+... &c. 0.333... (S) = 1/3 (Lim S) where S=0.333... and Lim S = 1/3. https://www.academia.edu/45001199/Mainstream_mathematics_professors_are_incorrigibly_stupid_creatu |

Posted: 9 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium In my textbook I discuss the only practical use of trigonometry. In Old Math, trig only confused students, and no-one can ever think in terms of trig in their head. For trig functions are fake functions and need a polynomial replacement. 4 |

Posted: 9 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Apparently after Dr.Feynman departed Cornell, it has been on a down hill slide ever since, for they still think slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, while a High School student near Cornell can show them it is a Oval. The gravest error |

Posted: 9 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium General Nakasone,Dr.Panchanathan NSF,kibo analbuttfuckmanure attacks on Rensselaer Polytech Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 7:51:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney (kib |

Posted: 9 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium General Nakasone,Dr.Panchanathan NSF,kibo analbuttfuckmanure attacks on Rensselaer Polytech Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 7:51:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney (kib |

Posted: 9 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Math con-artists of conic sections Roger Penrose, Andrew Wiles, Frances Kirwan, Terry J.Lyons, Ben Green. I at least expected mathematicians to be among the most honest people on Earth. Sadly, late in life I find they are some of the most c |

Posted: 9 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Christian Leumann, Walter Benjamin, Emil Theodor Kocher is the reason Jan Burse could never admit slant cut in single cone is actually a Oval, never ellipse due to number of axes of symmetry, the same reason that everyone at Bern are failur |

Posted: 9 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Rahul Pandharipande, Richard Pink, Tristan Riviere is the reason Jan Burse could never admit slant cut in single cone is actually a Oval, never ellipse due to number of axes of symmetry, the same reason that everyone at ETH Zurich are failu |

Posted: 9 Days 14 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse The summer time sadness of Dan Christensen. He cannot prove the following with his approach: /* not provable */ |/- ALL(a):[Evenness(a) => Oddness(Successness(a))] It is not provable in yours, Dans, because for example, this is not |

Posted: 9 Days 14 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse The summer time sadness of Dan Christensen. He cannot prove the following with his approach: /* not provable */ |/- ALL(a):[Evenness(a) => Oddness(Successness(a))] It is not provable in yours, Dans, because for example, this is not |

Posted: 9 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Horst Knorrer, Emmanuel Kowalski, Urs Lang is the reason Jan Burse could never admit slant cut in single cone is actually a Oval, never ellipse due to number of axes of symmetry, the same reason that everyone at ETH Zurich are failures of g |

Posted: 9 Days 14 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Students Beware: Even at his advanced age (18+)?, Dan Christensen is STILL struggling with basic, elementary-school arithmetic. Dan Christensen schrieb am Montag, 18. April 2022 um 03:49:51 UTC+2: |

Posted: 9 Days 14 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Students Beware: Even at his advanced age (18+)?, Dan Christensen is STILL struggling with basic, elementary-school arithmetic. Dan Christensen schrieb am Freitag, 13. Mai 2022 um 06:55:51 UTC+2: |

Posted: 9 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Math con-artists of conic sections Andrew Wiles, Frances Kirwan, Terry J.Lyons, Ben Green, Roger Penrose. The math failure, con artist Andrew Wiles, get help from Frances Kirwan, Terry J.Lyons, Ben Green, Roger Penrose to help the Wiles fa |

Posted: 9 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Cynthia Larive, Mark Alber, John Baez, Mei-Chu Chang is the reason John Baez could never admit slant cut in single cone is actually a Oval, never ellipse due to number of axes of symmetry, the same reason that everyone at UC Riverside thi |

Posted: 9 Days 15 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of John Gabriel's fake math JG's Pathetic Daily Spam Post Same old crap gets the same old response. On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 12:16:57 AM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel (JG), Troll Boy) wr |

Posted: 9 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Dartmouth College, Kibo Parry M calls them failures. Why Kibo, is it because they can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem Calculus. For they cannot even understand that a |

Posted: 9 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 9 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 9 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 9 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 9 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 9 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium MIT,Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Kibo Parry M. says entire MIT professors of math and science are goonclod failures, not just scatterbrained like Gilbert Strang that defines "complex number" on page 360 or |

Posted: 9 Days 17 Hours ago by: sergio |

Posted: 9 Days 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Duke Univ dunces Steffen Bass,Robert Behringer,David Beratan,Robert Brown says Kibo Parry M. in his 30 years nonstop stalking, he even bad-mouthes his mother. Re: Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as McElro |

Posted: 9 Days 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Duke Univ dunces Steffen Bass,Robert Behringer,David Beratan,Robert Brown says Kibo Parry M. in his 30 years nonstop stalking, he even bad-mouthes his mother. Re: Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as McElroy |

Posted: 9 Days 18 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Weird. In the natural numbers, an odd number ALWAYS directly follows an even number. It is obviously a true statement, but that doesn't mean it is easy to prove. Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my |

Posted: 9 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Amy Coney Barrett, Roberts,Alito,Kavanaugh,Gorsuch, Kibo Parry M insane 30 year nonstop stalker says are court jesters// Science magazine says lead gasoline set many back in IQ several rungs of intelligence. And we can use Citizen's United |

Posted: 9 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium No wonder Ohio State is in the weeds of mathematics, when its professor/s believe in b.s. of Kibo Parry M & Jan Burse that 938 is 12% short of 945 or that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse of 2 axes of symmetry yet cone has only 1 a |

Posted: 9 Days 19 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. I show it to you for the umpteenth Time ... graphically: 0.2 * 0.5 * 2 = 2i *5i *20i = 200i^3 ... improperly called 0.2 ..///////////////////// /////////////////// ////////////////// //////////////// | |

Posted: 9 Days 20 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Open letter to heirs of Dr.Richard Feynman: please, can you provide information on whether Dr. Feynman had Hamartoma of the liver??? 6m views Open letter to heirs of Dr.Richard Feynman: please, can you provide information on whether Dr. Fe |

Posted: 9 Days 20 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Richard Pink, Tristan Riviere, Dietmar Salamon, ETH, are you as dumb in math as Jan Burse, who still thinks the slant cut in single cone is an ellipse, yet the single cone has but 1 axis of symmetry. Stupidity like this is what keeps ETH f |

Posted: 9 Days 20 Hours ago by: sergio so e^2+w^2+h^2 = e^2*w^2*h^2 or w^2 - e^2*w^2*h^2 + e^2 + h^2 = 0 w^2(1-e^2*h^2) = -e^2 - h^2 w^2 = -(e^2 + h^2)/(1-e^2*h^2) Extra Credit problem; 1 h cannot be this value: _______________ 2. what does - sign mean in above equat |

Posted: 9 Days 21 Hours ago by: Jim Burns pi = e*w*h, pi^2 = e^2+w^2+h^2 One line, comma separated. I tried it, it works. There's an "exact form" button, if you'd like that. |

Posted: 9 Days 22 Hours ago by: Barry Schwarz snip algebraic solution It's actually three known quantities: length, volume, and diagonal. Two of the quantities happen to have the same value but that is just a nit. You have a set of two simultaneous equations in two unknowns, w an |

Posted: 9 Days 22 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney Capitalism is an economic system where man exploits man. In Communism, it is the opposite. |

Posted: 9 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium crancks & loonies by James Kibo Parry Sep 28, 1994, 5:14:31 AM By the way by James Kibo Parry March 8, 1999 Re: bwr fml & Kibo Parry M on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, failures of Natural Logarithm with th |

Posted: 9 Days 23 Hours ago by: sergio No, the Ruskies are after, and took over, the Ukranian Coal fields in the east, 7th largest coal reserves in the world. but you wont hear any of that on Main Stream Media... |

Posted: 9 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo, does Harvard fail math because they are too stupid to see ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry and could not possibly be the slant cut in single cone since it has 1 axis of symmetry. Kibo, were you insane before you started your 30 year no |

Posted: 9 Days 23 Hours ago by: Comer Ohishi of course there is. You guys confuse what is communism with capitalism and opposite. |

Posted: 9 Days 23 Hours ago by: Dario Okimoto iDIOT, the nazi "ukraine" did that. The russian federation already won a part larger than UK from the nazi territory known as nazi_ukraine. Larger than UK, idiot. |

Posted: 9 Days 23 Hours ago by: sergio e is one outside edge. the problem could be over specified, via pi as volume and purble diagonal but its all simple equations |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: sergio Ka-Putin, he's a gonner, by his own ego. If I want to take over a country, I either pay off or bribe the elected officals, like the USA does, or I give the country great deals on huge projects that put them into big debt like China does |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Open letter to heirs of Dr.Richard Feynman: please, can you provide information on whether Dr. Feynman had Hamartoma of the liver??? 4m views 4 views Subscribe Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archime |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: FromTheRafters I think he is saying the volume of the right rectangular prism is fixed at pi as is the length of that purple diagonal, and e is the prism's length. |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Is there private property in 100% pure communism? |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Mostowski Collapse /* not provable */ |/- ALL(a):[Evenness(a) => Oddness(Successness(a))] But dont be sad, you can still prove this here with your approach, isn't this great? /* provable */ |- ALL(a):[a e n => (Evenness(a) => Oddness(Successness(a)))] It |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Chris M. Thomasson [...] Just a sketch, the dimensions are arbitrary for now. However, you are talking about the diagonal in the purple line, right? Just to clarify. https://i.ibb.co/ct8GgZb/ct-pov-music.png |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Micah Watanabe he wasn't even be talking about starvation, nazis, depopulation, etc wars, planetary wars etc, as some other children of capitalism. |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Amy Coney Barrett bereft of logical intelligence to stigmatize millions of women as criminals On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 3:06:52 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: Why Kibo Parry M, because Amy Coney Barrett thinks it is fine and dandy t |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Luiz Kawayama absolutely, my friend. And I wasn't even be talking about vaccines, depopulation, nazism and nuclear wars. That's capitalism. Go read Marx to learn more about it. why, because americans are leaving america, replaced by the immigrants |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: sergio hey, did you ever see Stalker (1979) russian sci fi ? Excellent! its on youtube free. average shot length is more than 1 min, it pulls you into the movie "Stalker is a complex, oblique parable that draws unforgettable images a |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Why Kibo Parry M, because Amy Coney Barrett thinks it is fine and dandy to make a young mother with a Zika pregancy who aborts the Zika fetus, and then Amy can stigmatize this young woman as a criminal. Maybe Putin's search for Nazis is m |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Trying to clarify myself here... The height should be the tip (say, positive y axis) of the right triangle in the diagonal of the box, right? It needs its hypotenuse to be pi, right? |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Byron Ninomiya you mean capitalism, exploiting human being, you stupid sob. In communism people owns the earth. In capitalism the rich parasites owns the people. Look around you, lockdown, vaccines, forced this and that, wars, propaganda massmedia s |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium General Nakasone,Dr.Panchanathan NSF,kibo analbuttfuckmanure attacks on Rensselaer Polytech Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 7:51:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney (kib |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: sergio socialism is using other people's function... |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: mitchr...@gmail.com or it will go on forever... at least till you die... |

Posted: 10 Days ago by: sergio T24gNS8xMi8yMDIyIDI6MzQgUE0sIFRpbW90aHkgR29sZGVuIHdyb3RlOg0KPiBPbiBUaHVy c2RheSwgTWF5IDEyLCAyMDIyIGF0IDM6MTY6NTggUE0gVVRDLTQsIFRpbW90aHkgR29sZGVu IHdyb3RlOg0KPj4gT24gVGh1cnNkYXksIE1heSAxMiwgMjAyMiBhdCAxMTozNToxNSBBTSBV VEMtNCwgVGltb3RoeSBHb |

Posted: 10 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Michael Moroney , Isiah Tabuchi 2 Re: awful 160th published book MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium Preface: A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subje |

Posted: 10 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium 1m views Now the reason I say wonderful is because so much of our world is being torn down and torn apart in crazy, insane and i |

Posted: 10 Days 1 Hour ago by: Chris M. Thomasson https://fractalforums.org/gallery/1612-120522191048.png |

Posted: 10 Days 1 Hour ago by: Timothy Golden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5P1Slac6W0 |

Posted: 10 Days 1 Hour ago by: William Indeed. Any single *element* of N_p can be removed. (indeed any finite set of elements of N_p). The *set* N_p cannot be removed. There is no single element of N_p (indeed no finite set of elements) which cannot be removed just as t |

Posted: 10 Days 1 Hour ago by: Timothy Golden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhj8xTRjFA0 |

Posted: 10 Days 1 Hour ago by: Dan joyce Still trying to plug into Wolfram alpha a formula with two known values Length (e) and volume (pi) and inner space diagonal (pi). To get width an height. Anyone? |

Posted: 10 Days 1 Hour ago by: Nick Kinoshita Ruble named world’s best-performing currency https://www.rt.com/business/555354-ruble-named-worlds-best-performing-currency/ Switzerland releases some frozen Russian assets https://www.rt.com/business/555381-switzerland-releases-froz |

Posted: 10 Days 2 Hours ago by: Brady Nakano 2022.05.10 Cacanada Is The Next Ukraine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYMhIe14uF0 Fuse (Tu-22M3s with Kh-22_32s) https://www.bitchute.com/video/sPJguQhvheke/ AZOV didn't let civilians out https://www.bitchute.com/video/aW3OQpp3Jbcc/ |

Posted: 10 Days 2 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters That's what many people overlook. Also, I'm hard-pressed to find a real number which doesn't have at least one convergent series representation. |

Posted: 10 Days 2 Hours ago by: Isiah Tabuchi Top Places Where Americans Are fleeing to as Americans are buying second passports as a 'plan B' https://www.brighteon.com/55adcbc4-03c9-49cb-83d7-f719119c50de aHmm?? americans fleeing america is treason. |

Posted: 10 Days 2 Hours ago by: Joedy Takudo Russia would need to take first Odessa, and then take over a land corridor through Ivano-Frankivsk, Chernivtsi and Vinnytsia, which are quite russophobic, and allow Hungary to regain the Zakarpattia Oblast. Yes, Serbia was bombed by t |

Posted: 10 Days 2 Hours ago by: Lucky Tsushima my friend, whatever happens to Galicia and western nazi "Ukraine", it's vitally important for Russia to establish a land bridge to Hungary. That way, Russia will be able to have unimpeded trade with the most pro-Russian states in the |

Posted: 10 Days 2 Hours ago by: Hayse Soho this, stupider than a bag of rocks, nazi bitch, still can't discern among the medium and the data. You unemployable dementia hit idiot. |

Posted: 10 Days 2 Hours ago by: Maron Umeki |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse No bitchute? Is it gone like rutube? Dany Hoshino schrieb am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2022 um 19:29:46 UTC+2: |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Phil Konda |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium .... 82) Archimedes Plutonium> 160th published book 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium 7) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: sergio Bob is at = > kbob kbob = (mbob+(mbob+nbob-1)*(mbob+nbob-2)/2)/1, so just mbob, nbob me and I send kbob right over (kbob = King Bob.) Extra Credit: if mbob is latitude, and nbob is longitiude, would King Bob not be a natural numbe |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Jim Burns tl;dr If C is an ordered collection which contains a first and a last, then appending k+1 to it == C∪{k+1} yields an ordered collection C∪{k+1} which contains a first and a last. Bob can exchange into places such that each non-emp |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney Considering the limited data available, where one person is known to be a complete failure at math and science, while the other five are unknown abilities, it is certainly false. The real question which should be asked is whether the |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Dany Hoshino amazing how stupid you two nazis can be. If nazi Poland enters fictitious nazi "ukraine", a russian territory, you're all fucked up. Ukraine and Russia Updates. The outcome is inevitable, Russia has won. https://www.brighteon.com/347cf |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Jim Burns that all matrix positions have Bob-conservation -- "Bob" being the name of the O which starts at the position of 1/2 in the matrix, and then swaps positions with X's at 2/1, 3/1, 6/1, ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjAg-8qqR3g St |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: sergio wrong! your h is a letter, that is all. Euler did not make a mistake, Mr Rectum forged a mistake on one of Eulers papers, and was caught by many in this forum doing that. |

Posted: 10 Days 3 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Are you lost in a universe of alternate facts? I just told you that h does not shrink or expand. For every non-parallel secant line there is a *unique* h and my identity holds: [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h) Of course, but I did n |

Posted: 10 Days 4 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse /* provable */ |- ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) => Oddnumber(Successor(a))] Is depreved by Dan Christensens poop 💩 mathematics: /* not provable */ |/- ALL(a):[Evenness(a) => Oddness(Successness(a))] He even managed to botch the Peano axioms |

Posted: 10 Days 4 Hours ago by: sergio WM doesnt have the background, nor the knowledge structure, to understand. If he cannot follow or do a Proof, he is pre-algebra at best. Cantor subject matter is out of reach for him. |

Posted: 10 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen You are repeating yourself, Jan Burse. See my reply just now to your identical posting on this topic elsewhere. Likewise, your next 3 postings here. Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my Math Blog at h |

Posted: 10 Days 4 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse /* Not Provable in the Dan Christensen Approach */ ALL(a):[Evenness(a) => Oddness(Successness(a))] Whereas with Euclid we can prove: /* Pretty much standard for everybody from math */ ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) => Oddnumber(Successor(a))] M |

Posted: 10 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Irrelevant. As usual, you are grasping at straws, Jan Burse. Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann [...] That does not say or mean "one after the other". That emphatically is *NOT* stated here. OK. This is the process of induction. Please give a proper citation. You seem to be really, really efficient at dredging up citations and |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergio T24gNS8xMi8yMDIyIDEwOjM1IEFNLCBUaW1vdGh5IEdvbGRlbiB3cm90ZToNCj4gT24gV2Vk bmVzZGF5LCBNYXkgMTEsIDIwMjIgYXQgMTowOTozMiBQTSBVVEMtNCwgVGltb3RoeSBHb2xk ZW4gd3JvdGU6DQo+PiBPbiBUdWVzZGF5LCBNYXkgMTAsIDIwMjIgYXQgOToxMzozNSBBTSBV VEMtNCwgVGltb3RoeSBHb |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: Timothy Golden If we accept the logic that rejects the rational value as fundamental based upon its embedded operator we land in the evaluated form of those values, for instance 3/5= 0.6, and we see that but for the decimal point the representation is f |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse In a few days the bat shit crazy and high as a kite Dan Christensen, went from this being consistent (has a model) with his Peano Axiom Successness: s(-1) = 0 To this being consistent (has a model) with his freaking carzy bullshit Evenn |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse In a few days the bat shit crazy and high as a kite Dan Christensen, went from this being consistent (has a model) with his Peano Axiom Successness: s(-1) = 0 To this being consistent (has a model) with his freaking carzy bullshit Evenne |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse In mathematics, a well-defined expression or unambiguous expression is an expression whose definition assigns it a unique interpretation or value. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-defined_expression You can even not exclude s(-1)=0 |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[Even'(a) <=> Even(a)] Anyway, you are allowed to do whatever you want, even if its the biggest bullshit on this planet. Your nonsense is not a definition, only an axiom. Most of mathematics is based on well defined definition |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Less wonky and more intuitive would be: "For every natural number, we say that it is even if and only if it is multiple of two." ALL(a):[a in N => [Even(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b in N & a=2*b]]] There is no need to formally consider anything o |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[Even'(a) <=> Even(a)] Anyway, you are allowed to do whatever you want. Only your nonsense is not a definition, only an axiom. Dan Christensen schrieb am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2022 um 16:05:49 UTC+2: |

Posted: 10 Days 5 Hours ago by: sergio Whoa!! that is not fact at all. Your goofy exchanges are deception. more lies. Wrong. k represents a natural number. you never took Algebra. no. k = m+(m+n-1)*(m+n-2)/2 is mapping of all rational numbers to all natural number |

Posted: 10 Days 6 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Of the documented 6 people with adult Hamartoma, for this abnormality is one of the most rare medical conditions in Medical Science. I wonder if all 6 such persons are super-achievers in life? Perhaps super atheletes or business persons, ev |

Posted: 10 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergio nonsense. wrong, it is only one to one mapping. keep trying to prove Cantor wrong, it is good use of your time. |

Posted: 10 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergio those quotes do not save your bad math, they underscore the fact that you do not fully understand them. |

Posted: 10 Days 6 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen I think most would prefer the less wonky and more intuitive: "For every natural number, we say that it is even if and only it is a multiple of 2." ALL(a):[a in N => [Even(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b in N & a=2*b]]] There is no need to formally |

Posted: 10 Days 6 Hours ago by: Dan joyce So my c value that I brute forced calculated is replaced by a different value when W and H are switched. Which makes h^2 + e^2 giving c^2 a different value and w^2 +pi^2 that same different value. But the box length and volume is unchang |

Posted: 10 Days 6 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Now the reason I say wonderful is because so much of our world is being torn down and torn apart in crazy, insane and illogic. We see Putin attacking Ukraine when we need Russia to help colonize Europa for our Sun has gone Red Giant Phase |

Posted: 10 Days 6 Hours ago by: WM No one matrix for one step of enumerating. "unter beidseitiger Wahrung der Rangfolge ihrer Elemente auf einander beziehen, abbilden lassen" [G. Cantor, letter to R. Lipschitz (19 Nov 1883)] "So stellt uns beispielsweise eine veränderl |

Posted: 10 Days 6 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Given: ALL(a):[a in N => [Even(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b in N & a=2*b]]] ALL(a):[a in N => [Even'(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b in N & a=2*b]]] Since evenness is only determined for the natural numbers, it would suffice to prove: ALL(a):[a in N => [Eve |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse /* Doesn't work for Dan Christensens Case 1 */ ALL(a):[a in n => [Evenness1(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b in n & a=2*b]]] ALL(a):[a in n => [Evenness2(a) <=> EXIST(b):[b in n & a=2*b]]] Then Evenness is not self synonymous. And therefore it is not |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium I see Roberts,Gorsuch,Kavanaugh,Alito,Barrett as insane justices for ever thinking that Zika pregnant mothers do not have a right to abortion and without being criminalized. I think it sheer crazy that 4 men and 1 woman believe that a youn |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann In other words, you are now stating that your matrix sequence was irrelevant. Good job! (This also gives me the opportunity to point out to you again that "element for element" does not mean "one after the other". Why, oh why, do you insi |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[Wonky(a) <=> ~Danish(a)] This means that practically all of mathematics is wonky, because Dan Christensen doesn't have the slightest clue.. Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2022 um 15:30:18 UTC+2: |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) <=> a e n & EXIST(b):[b e n & a=b+b]] This here: ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) => a e n] And then its a matter of contraposition: ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evennumber(a)] Nevertheless Dan Christensen, high as a kite and bat s |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) <=> a e n & EXIST(b):[b e n & a=b+b]] This here: ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) => a e n] And then its a matter of contraposition: ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evennumber(a)] Nevertheless Dan Christensen, high as a kite and bat s |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) <=> a e n & EXIST(b):[b e n & a=b+b]] This here: ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) => a e n] And then its a matter of contraposition: ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evennumber(a)] Nevertheless Dan Christensen, high as a kite and bat s |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) <=> a e n & EXIST(b):[b e n & a=b+b]] This here: ALL(a):[Evennumber(a) => a e n] And then its a matter of contraposition: ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evennumber(a)] Nevertheless Dan Christensen, high as a kite and bat s |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse |- ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evennumber(a)] Or in natural language: "Everything that is not a natural number is also not an even natural number" Which is the same as saying: "Everything that is not a car is not also not an electro car" Pret |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse |- ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evennumber(a)] Or in natural language: "Everything that is not a natural number is also not an even natural number" Which is the same as saying: "Everything that is not a car is not also not an electro car" Pret |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Because Euclid is the ancestor of nowadays mathematics. And he defines Evennumber, whereas you have only an axiom about Evenness which is not a definition. With Euclids definition we can of course prove: |- ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evennumber( |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Jan Burse's new little buddy and fellow troll JG (a match made in heaven!) really seems to be getting to him, what with the sense utter desperation, even the silly references to Euclid! To salvage what's left of his pet theory, poor Jan |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Roberts Supreme Court condemns every young pregnant mother, even with Zika microbrain virus to carry that baby to term. Suppose you are a young woman, pregnant and see that you catch Zika virus. You see your unborn baby with a micro skull |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Jan Burse's new little buddy and fellow troll JG (a match made in heaven!) really seems to be getting to him, what with the sense utter desperation, even the silly references to Euclid! To salvage what's left of his pet theory, poor Jan |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM My h is a shrinking sequence! Not everything Euler said must be false because he made a mistake. Regards, WM |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM Fine. That would be easily disproved. Each element which is followed by an infinite set belongs to a finite set, a FISON, and is provably not required to make the set ℕ infinite. Therefore you can remove it. ∀n ∈ ℕ_p: |ℕ \ {1, |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM Each m/n so defined has aleph_0 successors. Therefore your argument is void. No it follows from the fact that only exchanges take place which never can empty a place. Wrong. It is impossible that something leaves the matrix. But the |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM No. All fractions 1/1, 1/2, 2/1, 1/3, 2/2, 3/1, 1/4, 2/3, 3/2, 4/1, 1/5, 2/4, 3/3, 4/2, 5/1, 1/6, 2/5, 3/4, 4/3, 5/2, 6/1, ... described by indices k = (m + n - 1)(m + n - 2)/2 + m are collected in the first column. But all other column |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM Therefore it is irrelevant. "Wenn zwei wohldefinierte Mannigfaltigkeiten M und N sich eindeutig und vollständig, Element für Element, einander zuordnen lassen (was, wenn es auf eine Art möglich ist, immer auch noch auf viele andere W |

Posted: 10 Days 7 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen HA, HA!! Poor Jan Burse, sticking up for his little buddy and fellow troll here, is grasping at straws here. To salvage his pet theory, the notion of evenness must be determined, not only for the natural numbers, but EVERY OBJECT IN THE U |

Posted: 10 Days 8 Hours ago by: sobriquet In a way they do exist. Like if you add up an infinite number of numbers, the result might be a number (like the sum of numbers obtained from 1/(2^n) for n=0 to n=infinity, which adds up to 2). Even though you can't actually obtain the re |

Posted: 10 Days 9 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com There are plenty of us sane ones, I am and a few others. You, Gabriel, etc are the cranks and crackpots here. It doesn't because mathematicians do not care about the real world and physical stuff. There is nothing to wake up from. Inf |

Posted: 10 Days 9 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse We want bitchute, and we want it now! Len Deguchi schrieb am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2022 um 12:18:38 UTC+2: |

Posted: 10 Days 10 Hours ago by: Len Deguchi What the fuck is a "bitchute", this stupid individual isn't even knowing what a "bitchute" is. I wonder how you braindead individuals are allowed posting in a sober serious science group. You failed all your exams, you deplorable stup |

Posted: 10 Days 10 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse No more bitchute cocaine? Where are the many bitchute links? LoL Len Deguchi schrieb am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2022 um 12:02:12 UTC+2: |

Posted: 10 Days 10 Hours ago by: Len Deguchi you two ladies talk like nazis. In "ukraine". |

Posted: 10 Days 10 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse |- ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evennumber(a)] On the other hand for Dan Christensens Evenness you cannot prove it, |/- ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evenness(a)] there is an obstancle in the way, the Dan Christensens definitions are not well defined: "In m |

Posted: 10 Days 10 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensen 's fake math After 2 days, he still didn't understand the difference betweeen Evenness and Evennumber. Dan Christensen is the Super Rectum of stupidity. Dan Christensen schrieb am Son |

Posted: 10 Days 10 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensen 's fake math After 2 days, he still didn't understand the difference betweeen Evenness and Evennumber. Dan Christensen is the Super Rectum of stupidity. Dan Christensen schrieb am Do |

Posted: 10 Days 10 Hours ago by: Barry Schwarz I assume that by inner space diagonal you mean the diagonal between opposite corners that happens to pass through he center of the box. The volume of a rectangular box is given by l * w * h. The diagonal is given by sqrt(l^2 + w^2 + h^2 |

Posted: 10 Days 11 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Many mathematicians aren't interested in philosophy. |

Posted: 10 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium 161st published book PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science. |

Posted: 10 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle Dartmouth College, Kibo Parry M, why does Dartmouth College continue to fail to see slant cut in cone is Oval, never the ellipse. On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Mi |

Posted: 10 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Caltech worse than MIT-- run and hide from Oval is slant cut in single cone, not ellipse. Kip Thorne, David Goodstein, Thomas Rosenbaum, the run and hide crowd of physics, not the Dr. Feynman Barry Barish,Felix Boehm,Steven Frautschi,Dav |

Posted: 10 Days 12 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com You are still too stupid to understand what circular means. It is very rigorous, unlike your shit. Newton and the gang were way smarter than you have ever been. Yet fails doing derivatives for many functions and points that calculus c |

Posted: 10 Days 13 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium #5-8, 160th published book MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium Preface: A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about t |

Posted: 10 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Liposarcoma is a rare cancer. Both Dr. Feynman and AP had it. Liver Hamartoma in adults is extremely rare, last time I looked-- only 6 people on Earth have it. AP has it. Did Dr. Feynman have it? AP |

Posted: 10 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Caltech worse than MIT-- run and hide from Oval is slant cut in single cone, not ellipse. Kip Thorne, David Goodstein, Thomas Rosenbaum, the run and hide crowd of physics, not the Dr. Feynman Barry Barish,Felix Boehm,Steven Frautschi,Davi |

Posted: 10 Days 14 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta As a result of my historic theorem, it turns out that it's valid to simply throw away all the terms in h because these denote the difference in slope between the non-parallel secant line and the tangent line. However, my theorem never al |

Posted: 10 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Noam Elkies,Dennis Gaitsgory,Robin Gottlieb,Benedict Gross You mean the 4 failures, Kibo Parry M, 30 year nonstop stalker of Usenet Why do they lack the honesty and decency to admit slant cut in single cone is a oval, never the ellipse? |

Posted: 10 Days 15 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta For one who is constantly rejecting infinity and using it in his FISON arguments, it's perplexing that you would even quote such garbage as: "a/dx2 quantitas infinita infinities maior quam a/dx." - Euler So now you reject infinity, but |

Posted: 10 Days 15 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta For any x and h pair, my historic geometric theorem holds: [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h) Nothing shrinks or expands ever. |

Posted: 10 Days 15 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta No, h neither shrinks nor expands. h is merely the horizontal distance between the endpoints of each non-parallel secant line. You mean various forms of hand waving? And we can also see what happens in the finite difference quotient [ |

Posted: 10 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle Dartmouth College, Kibo Parry M, why does Dartmouth College continue to fail to see slant cut in cone is Oval, never the ellipse. On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, M |

Posted: 10 Days 15 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com We can think consideraby better than you. |

Posted: 10 Days 15 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com That is a function N to whatever set you have, no column in sight. Are you to stupid to understand that this is not your fucking column? Are you too stupid to understand that all this of yours is irrelevant and proves NOTHING of what |

Posted: 10 Days 15 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com set theory is part of matematics and very important in it |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney Looks like StupidPlutonium is having yet *another* autism meltdown, over a combination of the SC abortion ruling and being unable to understand such a trivial concept of "attack me, get punished for doing so". Not only can't he learn n |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of John Gabriel's fake math JG's Daily Desperation Spam Post -- Repeated Again and Again and Again On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 11:56:34 PM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel (JG), Troll Boy) w |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Jan Burse why Joel Mesot,Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, cannot ask the simple question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole On Saturday, June 9, 2018 |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Friedrich Durrenmatt, Daniel Vassella, Rene Fasel, Mani Matter , ETH Zurich On Saturday, June 9, 2018 at 6:35:36 PM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) wrote: |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Christian Leumann, Walter Benjamin, Emil Theodor Kocher, Kurt Wuthrich, ETH Zurich On Saturday, June 9, 2018 at 6:35:36 PM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) wrote: |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 10 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 10 Days 17 Hours ago by: Dan joyce |

Posted: 10 Days 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Terence Tao,Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, ETH Zurich On Saturday, June 9, 2018 at 6:35:36 PM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) wrote: UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology) UCLA Physics dept Ernest Abers, Elihu |

Posted: 10 Days 17 Hours ago by: NefeshBarYochai The truth of the matter is that nobody gives a damn which set of gooks wins. https://americanmilitarynews.com/2022/05/china-surrounds-taiwan-for-massive-invasion-rehearsal-drills/ |

Posted: 10 Days 17 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Terence Tao,Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology) UCLA Physics dept Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braun |

Posted: 10 Days 18 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse |/- ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evenness(a)] |/- ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Oddness(a)] |/- ALL(a):[a e n <=> Evenness(a) v Oddness(a)] |/- ALL(a):[Oddness(a) <=> a e n & ~Evenness(a)] On the other hand this is provable: |- ALL(a):[~a e n => ~Evennumber |

Posted: 10 Days 18 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse When you are an ultra moron as you are you, that cannot keep track of context, you should not use the same predicate name in different contexts as you do here: Dan Christensen schrieb am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2022 um 04:08:02 UTC+2: Better |

Posted: 10 Days 18 Hours ago by: David Petry Here's a quote from Abraham Robinson, who is undeniably a legit mathematician (use Wikipedia if you need to know more). "I think that there is a real need, in formalism and elsewhere, to link our understanding of mathematics with our unde |

Posted: 10 Days 18 Hours ago by: David Petry Using the Taylor series for log(1+x) gives (log(1+x)-x)/x^2 = -1/2 - x/3 + x^2/4 ... which gives |(log(1+x)-x)/x^2| = | -1/2 - x/3 + x^2/4 ...| <= 1/2 + |x|/3 + |x|^2/4 ... (if |x| < 1) and if |x| <= 1/2, this gives |(log(1+x)-x)/ |

Posted: 10 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Did Feynman have CT scans? |

Posted: 10 Days 18 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. Unfortunately, it is not you who pay for the consequences .. but all Others who have not had time to adapt to your False .. |

Posted: 10 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Noam Elkies,Dennis Gaitsgory,Robin Gottlieb,Benedict Gross You mean the 4 failures, Kibo Parry M, 30 year nonstop stalker of Usenet Why do they lack the honesty and decency to admit slant cut in single cone is a oval, never the ellipse? |

Posted: 10 Days 19 Hours ago by: sergio nope, you have to be able to see that you have nothing first. |

Posted: 10 Days 19 Hours ago by: sergio well, no need to use real values like pi and e, assign them later. so the box has length a, width b, height c so volume is abc inner space diagional... assuming it goes from one corner to the opposite corner... that is a right triang |

Posted: 10 Days 19 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. I wonder, how do you think that a Mathematical System .. is not able to calculate the Volumes ...... and from here it started Your path in True Idiocy ... continues ... and Stable .... Basically ... the inability to understand the system . |

Posted: 27 Days 3 Hours ago by: Yifang Xie M: Marketing 8th Edition By Dhruv Grewal and Michael Levy ISBN10: 1264131186 ISBN13: 9781264131181 TO REQUEST SMTB, E-mail Us at pro.fast @ hotmail dot com We also provide help in CONNECT Homeworks, CONNECT Assignments, LearnSmart Quizzes |

Posted: 27 Days 3 Hours ago by: Yifang Xie Essentials of Economics 5th Edition By Stanley Brue and Campbell McConnell and Sean Flynn ISBN10: 1265350647 ISBN13: 9781265350642 TO REQUEST SMTB, E-mail Us at pro.fast @ hotmail dot com We also provide help in CONNECT Homeworks, CONNECT |

Posted: 27 Days 3 Hours ago by: olcott So when Ĥ copies its input this copied input goes no where? You still have not cleared up your huge gaff about the location of the tape of machines that are simulated by a UTM. When a UTM simulates the TM description of another |

Posted: 27 Days 4 Hours ago by: Richard Hachel x= 0 to 5.0245 ∫ sqrt (1+x²) ? ? ? R.H. |

Posted: 27 Days 4 Hours ago by: Richard Hachel Merci beaucoup. R.H. |

Posted: 27 Days 4 Hours ago by: Ross A. Finlayson Cantor's theorems are quite most simple and for each of the "original", "first", "anti-diagonal", "powerset", theorems of Cantor for uncountability, that there only exists one function "counting the real numbers" is from that there exis |

Posted: 27 Days 5 Hours ago by: William The natural numbers are a Peano set. Thus a "dark element" cannot be a natural number. |

Posted: 27 Days 6 Hours ago by: sergio Wrong. 1,2,3,4,... are all natural numbers. Where in the equation above is your "collectively removed darkies" ? Which term is it ? Wrong again. you stopped at n. when you stop at n, you only create a FISON and an ENDSEGMENT, no dar |

Posted: 27 Days 6 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Liar! |

Posted: 27 Days 7 Hours ago by: rosab In[1]:= Integrate[Sqrt[1 + x^2], x] Out[1]= 1/2 (x Sqrt[1 + x^2] + ArcSinh[x]) |

Posted: 27 Days 7 Hours ago by: Julio Di Egidio Is that even you? I don't think so, for a couple of years now. Yet, for example, physics is full of it: take the 2D coordinates of a point, (x,y), and now have those change in time, whence (x(t),y(t)), which is a trajectory, i.e. a lin |

Posted: 27 Days 7 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann Use the trigonometric substitution x = tan t, dx = sec^2 t, t = arctan x (with t in (-pi/2, +pi/2) ) That gives ∫ sqrt (1+x²) dx = ∫ sec^3 t dt, which you can integrate by parts. It's not pretty, but it leads to a closed-form soluti |

Posted: 27 Days 8 Hours ago by: Richard Hachel How integrate ∫ sqrt (1+x²) |

Posted: 27 Days 10 Hours ago by: WM Try logic: Peano naturals: ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n} = {n+1, n+2, ..., omega} . Dark naturals: {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = {omega} Regards, WM |

Posted: 27 Days 10 Hours ago by: WM Therefore the Peano set does not contain dark elements. But between the Peano set and omega there are dark elements. Peano natural: ∀n ∈ ℕ_P: {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n} = {n+1, n+2, ..., omega} . Dark naturals: {1, 2 |

Posted: 27 Days 10 Hours ago by: WM Simply use logic, compare and find the difference between the isolated omega {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = {omega} and the not isolated omega ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n} = {n+1, n+2, ..., omega} |

Posted: 27 Days 10 Hours ago by: WM Dark natural numbers cannot be used individually. They can only be used collectively. They can be removed to isolate omega {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = {omega} Definable natural numbers can be used individually, but omega wil |

Posted: 27 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Brian Stone NSF, General Nakasone, Kibo Parry M on math failure Thomas Hales. Why Kibo, because he is too dumb in math to do a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Or is it because he is still deluded with a slant cut in sing |

Posted: 27 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium James S. Olvestad NSF, General Nakasone, Kibo Parry M on math failure Philip Hanlon. Why Kibo, because he is still deluded with a slant cut in single cone as ellipse when it is in truth a Oval, see AP proof below. On Monday, April 25, 202 |

Posted: 27 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium General Nakasone,F.Crim NSF, Kibo Parry M on math failure Ruth Charney. Why Kibo, because she is still deluded with a slant cut in single cone as ellipse when it is in truth a Oval, see AP proof below. On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:18:1 |

Posted: 27 Days 15 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com Go ahead and define it. You still haven't defined what "dark" means No one is doing that N^2 and N are not the same sets so this is invalid. You ahve STILL NOT DEFINED DARK! It means nothing of the sort. You failed to define what |

Posted: 27 Days 15 Hours ago by: zelos...@gmail.com This is a pure non-sequitor |

Posted: 27 Days 15 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 27 Days 15 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney Looks like Plutonium's Cult of Failure really is a suicide cult that wants to take the whole world out with them. Pluto wants NATO to attack Russia, starting a nuclear WWIII, he counts the nukes different countries have and speculates |

Posted: 27 Days 15 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of JG's fake math On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:45:35 AM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel (JG), Troll Boy) wrote: When will YOU learn, Troll Boy? JG here claims to have a discovered a shor |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium And one can go through almost every subject matter of Old Math and find pockets of what I call "math teacher security" at the expense of teaching fake math that makes students scared and fearful of math. Parametric equations is a prime exa |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Following is a simple example of how a function is constructed in DC Proof--not just defined, but formally proven to exist. Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpres |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson [...] I got it! https://i.ibb.co/BLWJDdv/ct-golden-p7.png ;^) |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Now on page 422 of Fisher & Ziebur "Calculus and Analytical Geometry" 1965, 2nd edition they discuss parametric equations and propose parametric equations for the equation x^(2/3) + y^(2/3) = a^(2/3). And this is typical Old Math, where in |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of JG's fake math On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 12:39:28 AM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel (JG), Troll Boy) wrote: When will YOU learn, Troll Boy? JG here claims to have a discovered a shor |

Posted: 27 Days 16 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I think I got the spiral arcs in there, except I drew full circles instead of the specific arc segments: https://i.ibb.co/J7Tcrc8/ct-golden-p6.png I think the spiral is in here, embedded within the rendering... ;^) |

Posted: 27 Days 17 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson That's a damn good one! I still have not fitted the curves to the rectangles. Here is a line in white that gives the basic basis for such a curve: https://i.ibb.co/ZKFx57P/ct-golden-p5.png |

Posted: 27 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Yes, Xi, how could you let Russia steal the pride and joy of China-- Manchuria of the Tang, Liao, Jin, Eastern Xia, Yuan, Northern Yuan, Ming, Later Jin and Qing dynasties. Xi, why do you let Russia steal your land and have Putin neonazies |

Posted: 27 Days 19 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Now I realize that this-- what I am about to say --- does not constitute a proof that parametric equations are simply fake props. Statement: I notice that never is it required to turn a polynomial equation into a parametric equation. Never |

Posted: 27 Days 19 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium AP's 240th book of science// Parametric Equations of Old Math were phony props, to bolster up the fact that only Polynomials are true functions of mathematics. 1m views Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> Apr 24, 2022, 7:4 |

Posted: 27 Days 19 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium China's Xi, liberating their precious Outer Manchuria, Amur & Ussuri River valleys from Putin's neonazies in that region// Science Council Rules Earth Hands clapping and thanks to Xi for finally addressing Russia's stealing of Outer Manchu |

Posted: 27 Days 19 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 0 = a*x^2 + b*y^2 -a*b AP brain farto thinks, its an oval. I guess the following parametrization works: x = sqrt(b) cos(t) y = sqrt(a) sin(t). Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 25. April 2022 um 02:42:21 UTC+2: |

Posted: 27 Days 20 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse But atan2(_,_) drops out of the equation, also sin(_) and cos(_), you only need sqrt(_) if you want this parametrization:, with t=1 you land on the unit circle, centered at zero: x = t*cos(phi) y = t*sin(phi) Give it a go with by this |

Posted: 27 Days 20 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium 240th book of science by AP Parametric Equations of Old Math were phony props, to bolster up the fact that only Polynomials are true functions of mathematics. And so when practitioners of math call a function which is fakery and need to |

Posted: 27 Days 20 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 0 = x - y (or alternatively 0 = y - x) https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=0+%3D+x+-+y LoL Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 25. April 2022 um 02:28:39 UTC+2: |

Posted: 27 Days 20 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse phi = atan2(-a,b) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atan2 You can now solve the equation: 0 = a*x + b*y = a*t*cos(phi)+b*t*sin(phi) = a*t*b/c+b*t*(-a)/c where c = sqrt(a^2 + b^2) since phi = atan2(-a,b) = 0 |

Posted: 27 Days 20 Hours ago by: sobriquet A bit like this one.. https://www.geogebra.org/m/sdTJfqb7 |

Posted: 27 Days 20 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Probably misunderstanding you here... Think in terms of two 2d vectors, and the angle between them. atan2(0, 0) is undefined when x _and_ y are both zero. So, taking the angle between points: vec2 p0 = {0, 0} vec2 p1 = {0, 0} vec2 dif |

Posted: 27 Days 20 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. If ... You are so ignorant that you don't understand: 6m = 60i ... You have sold your soul to the devil to suffer and to err. 1i * 60i * 60i = 3600i^3 = 3.6m^3 If...you are so ignorant that you don't understand: 3600i^3 > 3600i^2 ... It m |

Posted: 27 Days 21 Hours ago by: sobriquet https://i.imgur.com/UTeMGGB.png Line 20 reads: "rectangular area inscribed in the unit circle p1 x p2 (with proportion of the long side to the short side equal to the golden ratio p0)" p0, p1 and p2 are defined in lines 3, 13 and 14 res |

Posted: 27 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium I suspect the answer is going to be from someone who has worked long and hard in parametric equations, that the answer is that parametric equations was a "polynomial seeking equation". That parametric equations were foolish and silly math |

Posted: 27 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Question please, for Julio. For I have always shyed away from parametric equations in my entire life. If all valid and true functions are only Polynomials, then, does that not eliminate parametric equations completely off the face of all o |

Posted: 27 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Xi's China invades Outer Manchuria, Amur & Ussuri Rivers to regain land taken by Russia, while Putin invades Ukraine// Science Council Rules Earth Wikipedia-- Starting with the Treaty of Aigun in 1858 and the Treaty of Peking in 1860,the S |

Posted: 27 Days 21 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Xi's China invades Outer Manchuria, Amur & Ussuri Rivers to regain land taken by Russia, while Putin invades Ukraine// Science Council Rules Earth Wikipedia-- Starting with the Treaty of Aigun in 1858 and the Treaty of Peking in 1860,the S |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson [...] https://i.ibb.co/g6yxn9H/ct-golden-p4.png |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Actually I drew 7 of them. Count again... ;^) |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse What sits in the corner and cries all days, because Selenski is not his homo partner? Its Luigi micro penis! Maybe try Putler as your bed warmer ... Or Kyrill ... Dong Vassilikos schrieb am Sonntag, 24. April 2022 um 23:51:37 UTC+2: |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson [...] Check these experiments out: https://i.ibb.co/8mTnfYp/ct-p1.png https://i.ibb.co/JqWGmzW/ct-p2.png https://i.ibb.co/pJm7Y7z/ct-p3.png https://i.ibb.co/VxGTXny/ct-p4.png |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I inscribed the infinite golden rectangles from a line thing I coded up in the unit circle: https://i.ibb.co/VxGTXny/ct-p4.png |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium MATHOPEDIA-- List of 77 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor by Archimedes Plutonium Last revision was 24Apr2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science. Preface: A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclope |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium AP's 187th book of Science-- crank, insanity, stubborness, stupidity brain mechanism revealed in MRI scans by Archimedes Plutonium Well, I just finished up on book 186th proving the muon of the real true electron of atoms. And in that book |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium AP's 187th book of Science-- crank, insanity, stubborness, stupidity brain mechanism revealed in MRI scans by Archimedes Plutonium Well, I just finished up on book 186th proving the muon of the real true electron of atoms. And in that book |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: William The natural numbers are a Peano set (axiom of infinity) A Peano set cannot contain a "dark" element The natural numbers do not contain a "dark" element. |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Dong Vassilikos Also, you are stupid nazi "micro penises" obsessed pedophile. |

Posted: 27 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Finally on YouTube ALAIN COLMERAUER L'AVENTURE PROLOG 11.04.2022 - Prolog Heritage https://www.youtube.com/watch?vtIg_QKndvE |

Posted: 27 Days 23 Hours ago by: RichD You drew two rectangles, it looks right. The dimensions are unclear. What's a and b, in the initial rectangle? I suggest you re-jigger the x and y co-ordinates, negative numbers aren't helpful in geometry. The circles look cool, but |

Posted: 27 Days 23 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Well, I am using two points to define a line. Wrt the "overkill" result, I used: (the last two parameters for the golden_v0 function are 2, 2-ary vectors (x, y), p0 and p1. The two 2d points the define a line in in 2d space from which |

Posted: 27 Days 23 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Ding Dong Vaseline. Thats a good match for micro penis. LoL Dong Vassilikos schrieb am Sonntag, 24. April 2022 um 23:19:39 UTC+2: |

Posted: 27 Days 23 Hours ago by: Dong Vassilikos You are an idiot. A stupid nazi. Proofs: Die Wahrheit über den Schauspieler Selenski der Euch in den dritten Weltkrieg führen will🤮 https://www.bitchute.com/video/qCCl5XnOCTP6/ |

Posted: 27 Days 23 Hours ago by: RichD Well done, Grasshoppa! Except your construction is ccw, opposite of mine. You drew six rectangles, right? That one is overkill. What initial values did you use for a and b? -- Rich |

Posted: 27 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor by Archimedes Plutonium Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science. Preface: A Physicsopedia is a book of the ove |

Posted: 27 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Hi, Julio, I am so happy to see you back in sci.math posting. I love reading your posts especially when you put the Cretins in their place. I suppose this may help in your question. In my mathematics, the only real true functions of mat |

Posted: 27 Days 23 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I used your danj**@*** address. Can you email me so I can send you the test MIDI I made? It should help us get on the same page. |

Posted: 27 Days 23 Hours ago by: Dan joyce No! I did not. Dan |

Posted: 28 Days ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I assume it is the argument of a complex number. |

Posted: 28 Days ago by: Python What an idiot you are Julio... |

Posted: 28 Days ago by: Python Like Jews, right? |

Posted: 28 Days ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Nice! I like the circles within the golden rectangle. Also, its nice how the rectangle is inscribed within the unit circle. Well done. Now, I want to put circles inside of the squares in the infinite rectangle. Let's see here... Here |

Posted: 28 Days ago by: sobriquet Some initial geometric sketches: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/lr7o4i0uat |

Posted: 28 Days 1 Hour ago by: sergio each element of {1,2,3,...} is finite, "can be handled individually", and the set (of natural numbers) is infinite. |

Posted: 28 Days 1 Hour ago by: William As any non empty subset of a Peano set must contain a least element, a Peano set cannot contain a "dark" element. |

Posted: 28 Days 1 Hour ago by: William Piffle. Each *element* is finite so each element "can be handled individually". |

Posted: 28 Days 1 Hour ago by: Julio Di Egidio The arg function takes one complex argument. I guess you meant arg(b-ia). Julio |

Posted: 28 Days 2 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse { (x,y) e R x R | 0 = a*x + b*y } There is a corner case a=0 & b=0 which is not a straight line, but the full plane R x R. The form with 0 = ... sees a curve as a finding roots problem. Which is not what one usually expects. But the "ro |

Posted: 28 Days 2 Hours ago by: Julio Di Egidio Right, I see, but it's the exact opposite that you are saying: instead of the relations here we bring it back to a functional form in two variables. Indeed, cool idea... I do not understand what you mean by arg(b,-a). Julio |

Posted: 28 Days 3 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse 0 = a*x + b*y. You can cover all straight lines going through zero, also horizontal and vertical lines. You can also derive this parametrization: x = t*cos(phi) y = t*sin(phi) where phi = arg(b,-a). ju...@diegidio.name schrieb am S |

Posted: 28 Days 3 Hours ago by: WM No. dark numbers can only be treated collectively. Regards, WM |

Posted: 28 Days 3 Hours ago by: WM Individually concerns always elements or a finite set. most of which cannot be handled individually. Regards, WM |

Posted: 28 Days 4 Hours ago by: Julio Di Egidio In the "parametric" example indeed I said t=0, not x nor y. But parametric was a red herring: look at the "simpler" example, that's already and directly the problem, that whenever I take the "factor" to the other side, I incur into an is |

Posted: 28 Days 4 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters As a point/slope formula neither x nor y can be zero. Both x in terms of y and y in terms of x must be true. IOW I think you would have to capture both 'bad' cases. |

Posted: 28 Days 4 Hours ago by: FromTheRafters Where do they start? Is there a 'least' dark number? Of what use are they? Please don't confuse them with the natural numbers which can be treated either way. |

Posted: 28 Days 4 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Are you a gator? No! But DC Proof looks dead, so I come over and investigate. But that makes you an investigator. Why isn’t gator attacking you?!?! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nTbQlZsQv0 |

Posted: 28 Days 4 Hours ago by: sergio Errors: 1. Omega is not a natural number, so your equation is error. Errors: 2. _def is not math, 3. Omega is not a natural number Errors: 4. This is not a proof, it does not have the structure of a proof 5. Calling math mistakes " |

Posted: 28 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse /* provable */ ALL(f):EXIST(y):ALL(a):[f(a) e y] For classes F we cannot prove: /* not provable */ ALL(F):EXIST(y):ALL(a):[F(a) e y] |

Posted: 28 Days 5 Hours ago by: Julio Di Egidio In fact, here is a simpler form of the same problem: Say I have the relation y = m x for m any real number. I could rewrite it as x = (1/m) y, and now it is not defined for m = 0. But, it occurs to me, if I need to express x in terms o |

Posted: 28 Days 5 Hours ago by: William "collectively treating" removing an infinite set. "individually treating" removing a finite set. An infinite *set* with finite *elements*. |

Posted: 28 Days 6 Hours ago by: Julio Di Egidio m = (y(t) - y0) / (x(t) - x0) (must be a constant) but that expression fails (doesn't it?) for t = 0, because x(0) = x0 and y(0) = y0, so we get m = 0/0. In practice, if we are given expressions y(t) and x(t) and need to find the cor |

Posted: 28 Days 7 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse There are some interesting new tensions, all over the place, the polarization is working out. Like tensions between Greece and Turkey. https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/diplomacy/conditions-between-turkey-greece-need-immediate-resolut |

Posted: 28 Days 8 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse LoL, ruSSian on a new crusade. I thought we have left behind religious wars, after all the CCCP was scientific atheist. But the Putler has invented a new scheme of polarizing the world, and who falls for it? Brain dead Italians like Lui |

Posted: 28 Days 8 Hours ago by: Dong Vassilikos British Mercenary Who Fought for Ukraine: "Ukraine Is Not the Good Guys" https://www.bitchute.com/video/WyVM4rD8lak9/ and that slavic nazi bitch, turned anglo-saxon overnight, victoria nulland fuck the EU, there will be a punishment fo |

Posted: 28 Days 9 Hours ago by: Dong Vassilikos maybe just you, not understnding it. |

Posted: 28 Days 9 Hours ago by: Dong Vassilikos part of the nazi criminal illegal organization nato, whereas turkey buys S400 etc from Russia. What an idiot. Does not matter, fool, you are supporting the nazi "ukraine" without being registered as nato bitch. What an idiot, ladies a |

Posted: 28 Days 9 Hours ago by: WM Correction This proves the existence of numbers which can only be treated collectively. I call them dark numbers. Regards, WM |

Posted: 28 Days 9 Hours ago by: WM Potentially infinitely many. But we cannot reach omega and ℵ₀ by individually treating the natural numbers ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n} = {n+1, n+2, ..., omega} . This proves the existence of numbers |

Posted: 28 Days 9 Hours ago by: WM Either there is no "all n" or most are dark. All you can treat is a potentially infinite collection ℕ_def ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n} = {n+1, n+2, ..., omega} . More is not possible. If there are all n |

Posted: 28 Days 10 Hours ago by: WM Potentially infinitely many. But we cannot reach omega and ℵ₀ by collectively treating the natural numbers ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n} = {n+1, n+2, ..., omega} . This proves the existence of numbers |

Posted: 28 Days 10 Hours ago by: WM We can reach omega by collectively treating the natural numbers {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = {omega} , but not by individually treating them. For all definable n we get ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, . |

Posted: 28 Days 13 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney Yes, one of these days, you need to come up with actual experimental evidence and scientific observations which supports your claims. Since you never provided any of the so-called "proof" which you claim, I must assume your peer revi |

Posted: 28 Days 13 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta But not all n. It's similar to your FISON argument. Every FISON is finite but not ALL. Therefore, this kind of reasoning suffers from the same problems. |

Posted: 28 Days 14 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo Parry M on Andrew Beal's dishonesty in math "silly boy, that's off by more than.." I am sure Mr. Beal can do a percentage correctly but not Kibo Parry M. who spends 30 years stalking those who succeed in science while Kibo fails. But M |

Posted: 28 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Jan Burse on Terence Tao dishonesty in math, for he knows a cone has one axis of symmetry, oval one axis of symmetry and ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry, yet dishonest Tao can not admit to his lifelong mistake, yet expects students at UCLA |

Posted: 28 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo says Andrew Wiles a math failure and physics failures Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss. Why Kibo? Because they think the electron of atoms is the 0.5MeV particle when in truth it is the muon stuck |

Posted: 28 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Kibo says analbuttfuckmanure Ken Ribet, John Stillwell,Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, SAYS stalker Kibo Parry M. of 30 years nonstop. On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: |

Posted: 28 Days 15 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 28 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 28 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 28 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 28 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 28 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 28 Days 17 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney You mean Stupid 卐Владольф Путлер卐 (Vladolf Putler) is going to attack Turkey next? Should someone remind 卐Путлер卐 that Turkey is part of NATO? And how will RuSSia do that with the Moskva busy doing submarine |

Posted: 28 Days 18 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium DQoNCkRhbiBDaHJpc3RlbnNlbiBzYXlzIGJlbmQgb3ZlciwgZXIuLi4gTWljaGFlbCBNZWlnaGVu LCBSb3NlIE0uIFBhdHRlbiBhbmQgTGluZGEgSGFzZW5mcmF0ei4gSGFzIERhbiwgZmluYWxseSBs ZWFybmVkIGEgZWxsaXBzZSBpcyBuZXZlciBhIGNvbmljIHNlY3Rpb24gZm9yIHRoYXQgaXMgdGhl IG92YWwgY |

Posted: 28 Days 19 Hours ago by: olcott The key fact (that is perpetually over your head) is that the input to H(P,P) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations making it necessarily correct for H to reject this input. It is your failure to acknowledge this key fact |

Posted: 28 Days 20 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 4:26:18 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote: When will you learn, Archie Poo? AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mis |

Posted: 28 Days 20 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson Here is what I coded up so far: ________________________ // Test for RichD over on sci.math... namespace ct_golden { void golden_v0( ct::plot::cairo::plot_2d& plot, unsigned long ri, unsigned long rn, |

Posted: 28 Days 21 Hours ago by: RichD Pull out your graph paper for this one - We're going to extend the golden ratio, from line segment to 2-D; a golden rectangle. Draw a rectangle of height a, width a + b Call it R[1]. (large, for clarity) b/a = r ~ .6 To be precis |

Posted: 28 Days 21 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I sent you a very simple test MIDI with the notes of pi. ______________________________ std::vector<int> pi_notes = { 3,1,4,1,5,9,2,6,5,3,5,8,9,7,9,3,2,3,8,4,6,2, 6,4,3,3,8,3,2,7,9,5,0,2,8,8,4,1,9,7,1,6,9,3, 9,9,3,7,5 }; __ |

Posted: 28 Days 22 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Putin and Xi can add 1+1=2, not Gerald Edgar so says Kibo Parry M & Major On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 1:30:15 PM UTC-5, Major Tom Threepersons wrote: Putin & Xi smarter than Gerald Edgar, Dr Panchanathan in math Why does not Dr. Ed |

Posted: 28 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Do they have biolabs in italy, maybe the LGBT+ are from some biolabs, a new weapon of destruct for the country. Hurry, put them into some filtration camps. LoL Chad Pezos schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 23:35:13 UTC+2: |

Posted: 28 Days 22 Hours ago by: Chad Pezos wasn't you supporting the factual, registered, nazis in "ukraine", my friend?? What more could you demand proving that you are a nazi, supporting a nazi war. anyhow, apparently the russian army will get control over Black Sea, includ |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Van & Kibo Parry M. why do you believe Xi wants Russia and USA exchange their 6,000 nuclear missiles sparing China of any hit and China then rules Earth, with Russia & USA & Europe nuclear ash piles? Why do you not see that Russia is aimin |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Tell it to the judges at Nuremberg War Crime Tribunal II, Nazi boy. Maybe you will get to sit next to your boss in the prisoners' dock. Don't be surprised if he tries to blame you. |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Chad Pezos No sir. Your numbers of gays and wankers in switzerland compared to italy. But the in italy they are gays and wankers too. I can't explain. |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Jan Burse on failures Doreen Wackeroth, Martin Grunewald, Peter Higgs, Dr. Kotwal, Dr. D. Denisov, Dr. Gomez-Ceballos, Harry Cliff. Kibo, how much of this physics failure is due to the fact that they "hide behind a big machine" as a substit |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Ukrainian Forces Strike Russian Command Post and Kill Two More Generals https://www.thedailybeast.com/ukrainian-forces-strike-russian-command-post-and-kill-two-more-generals —- Серьезно? Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Samstag |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Zelos, is Peter Higgs & Sheldon Glashow hiding behind a big machine rather than tell the truth-- they failed physics. So stupid they cannot even ask a question and cannot even add 1+1=2 in oval is the conic section. Kibo Parry M. on failur |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse You say they are all home because they are gay? (Not openly, since not accepted by the parents, but nevertheless totally ruSSian Nazi gay?) Chad Pezos schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 22:25:13 UTC+2: |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse You say they are all home because they are gay? (Not openly, since not accepted by the parents, but nevertheless totally ruSSian Nazi gay?) Chad Pezos schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 22:25:07 UTC+2: |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I can do that, and create high quality 3d graphics perfectly timed to it. I am currently using only 24 frames per second to time the music with. All delays are multiples of 24. The ratio can of course be different. Say, I choose to tim |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Chris M. Thomasson I never messed around with sound over on ShaderToy; need to give it a look. Thanks for the link! :^) Wrt my experiment wrt setting my field to music, I actually coded up a little MIDI program in C++ so I can create music right from my |

Posted: 28 Days 23 Hours ago by: Jim Burns The most important result of induction is this: Let P(i) be a predicate of second ends of collections with counting-orders which begin at 1 and end somewhere. If any second end k exists such that P(1) and ~P(k) then the second ends fro |

Posted: 29 Days ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Putin & Xi smarter than Gerald Edgar, Dr Panchanathan in math |

Posted: 29 Days ago by: sobriquet Do you use special software to create the music? I was kind of impressed with the results in shadertoy in this tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XeE0v5JLiQ But it seems likely a more convenient interface and system designed fo |

Posted: 29 Days ago by: Chad Pezos Why deleting the link to the public available data, my friend, showing the ruble increasing over the fake money you parasitize on, why? Afraid that facts puts you in prison, my friend? https://www.x-rates.com/graph/?from=RUB&to=USD&am |

Posted: 29 Days ago by: Chad Pezos That must be because the italians parents never accept their kids being gays. As different from the slavic nazis populating the fake territory named switzerland. |

Posted: 29 Days 1 Hour ago by: sergio what number is more than every finite number ? no, that is called finite. Collective Removal is what happens to garbage. wrong, there are no dark numbers, nor dark sets, nor dark elements, that darkness is all in your mind. You n |

Posted: 29 Days 1 Hour ago by: Archimedes Plutonium MATHOPEDIA-- List of 77 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor by Archimedes Plutonium Last revision was 14Jan2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science. Preface: A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclope |

Posted: 29 Days 1 Hour ago by: WM Yes. Yes. Every n that we can define satisfies the criterion. Most are dark. But by the general rule f(n) = 1/n we know that we can get as closely as we like to zero while the dark terms will never revert the result. Regards, WM |

Posted: 29 Days 2 Hours ago by: mitchr...@gmail.com Trump brilliance is history. As Biden the flunky is too. Mitchell Raemsch |

Posted: 29 Days 3 Hours ago by: olcott You might make a wild guess like this if you make sure to hardly pay attention. When you actually pay close attention and carefully study my paper it is very easy to see that H sees the same infinitely repeating pattern that we see, th |

Posted: 29 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan joyce Interesting! I like to put irrational or transcendental numbers like pi and e using the scale 0-9 as notes. Some interesting areas in the decimal expansion of many of these producing some interesting sounds. Maybe some renderings can be |

Posted: 29 Days 4 Hours ago by: olcott Yet when you carefully examine my paper: Anyone that is an expert in the C programming language, the x86 programming language, exactly how C translates into x86 and what an x86 processor emulator is can easily verify that the correctly |

Posted: 29 Days 4 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Ummm.... that was sarcasm. As you can see in your own neighbourhood, ruSSia's economy is going down the toilet. It will only get worse as long a war criminals like your boss are in charge. Genocide will never be cool, comrade. Remember... |

Posted: 29 Days 4 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Did you look in your flat. Maybe your son still lives with his parents. In Italy its 46.6%, in Switzerland its only 14.4% Percentage of Young Adults In Europe, aged 25-34, Who Still Live With Their Parents https://twitter.com/exploremapp |

Posted: 29 Days 5 Hours ago by: olcott None-the-less H(P,P) does correctly compute the mapping from its inputs to its own reject state therefore H(P,P) correctly decides the halt status of the halting problem's "impossible" input. Anyone that is an expert in the C programmi |

Posted: 29 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse I don't think I have ruSSian Nazi parents.... Sorry cannot help you, I am not your lost comrad son. Don Christodoulou schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 16:58:25 UTC+2: |

Posted: 29 Days 5 Hours ago by: Don Christodoulou You might be his son. What was the name of your mother? |

Posted: 29 Days 5 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse More comrades, comrades, … along the route Odessa, Transinistrien, Moldova… Until Putin can take a bath in Dubrovnik. On the other side of the adria he can wave micro penis. Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 1 |

Posted: 29 Days 5 Hours ago by: olcott All of my reviewers expect H(P,P) to compute the halt status of P(P), yet the behavior specified by the input to H(P,P) is not the same as the behavior specified by P(P). Anyone that is an expert in the C programming language, the x86 p |

Posted: 29 Days 6 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse Micro penis does not have family? ruSSian penis too smol? no future comrades through procreation, only occupation. Why are there so many more women in Russia than men? https://www.rbth.com/lifestyle/330062-why-are-there-so-many-women-in |

Posted: 29 Days 6 Hours ago by: Don Christodoulou yes sure, good point. To me that's an increasing. But related to *fake_money* which is increasing *even_more*. What an idiot. Russia rich in *commodities* not *fake_money*. https://www.x-rates.com/graph/?from=RUB&to=USD&amount=1 |

Posted: 29 Days 6 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen And the economy in ruSSia is just booming with the ruble stronger than ever. HA, HA, HA!!! |

Posted: 29 Days 7 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Not what I said. I don't know why you removed my comment? That is not the right thing to do. Here's what I wrote: One can say the same about the flawed mainstream definition of derivative: f'(x) = lim_{h->0} [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h As h decr |

Posted: 29 Days 7 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Even simpler: One cannot remove that which one does not have. |

Posted: 29 Days 7 Hours ago by: Don Christodoulou my-ohh-my, capitalist western europe fucked up. Driving fake economies, on energy stolen on *fake_money*, not possible anymore. A 2000 years ago, they killed an innocent man for their *_fake_money_* Milan, Italy...food rations https:/ |

Posted: 29 Days 7 Hours ago by: WM Every finite set, but with no upper threshold, that means more than every given finite number. That is potentially infinite. Other removals are only possible collectively. By definition: dark is all that you cannot remove individually. |

Posted: 29 Days 8 Hours ago by: Don Christodoulou Absolutely sure. Here's what the *russian_army* should do from the very beginning, along the provincial region of its territory, illegally named "ukraine". You take out their *_lying_propaganda_machine_* from the very beginning. Ver |

Posted: 29 Days 10 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse " then there exists bijection k: x -> y" Using function space notation, but then it proves: ALL(a):[a e x => k(a) e y] (k: x -> y) http://dcproof.com/CBS.htm But Dan Christensen is lucky, you can extract a function k' : x -> y, from k, v |

Posted: 29 Days 10 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dans fake DC Proof. Dan Christensen schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 06:50:29 UTC+2: |

Posted: 29 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Analbuttfuckmanure physics failures Dr.Arthur McDonald, Lisa Randall,Dr.Panchanathan, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Harry Cliff says Kibo Parry M, the 30 year stalker, who says 938 is 12% short of 945. On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 2:14: |

Posted: 29 Days 12 Hours ago by: Don Christodoulou Yes, he inherited, but to call Trump "brilliance" I cancel it from my areas. And yes so, the capitalist economy is *NOT* science. It's capitalism, a term you have to learn. The dirt at the bottom of the garbage hole. |

Posted: 29 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Analbuttfuckmanure physics failures Dr. Gomez-Ceballos, Lisa Randall,Dr.Panchanathan, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Harry Cliff says Kibo Parry M, the 30 year stalker, who says 938 is 12% short of 945. On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 2:14: |

Posted: 29 Days 12 Hours ago by: Ney Grammatakakis absolutely, this is what happens when you are not evil enough. Especially dealing with the capitalist nazis. Russia Lost 1000 KIA During the First 30 Days Because ‘They Felt Sorry for Ukraine’ – Expert https://www.veteranstoday.co |

Posted: 29 Days 12 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Analbuttfuckmanure John Stillwell,Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Ken Ribet, SAYS stalker Kibo Parry M. of 30 years nonstop. Why Kibo, because Tao, Wiles, Hales, Stillwell, Ribet, believes a single cone with 1 axi |

Posted: 29 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Analbuttfuckmanure Terrence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Ken Ribet, SAYS stalker Kibo Parry M. of 30 years nonstop. Why Kibo, because Tao, Wiles, Hales, Stillwell, Ribet, believes a single cone with 1 axis of symmetry |

Posted: 29 Days 15 Hours ago by: Archimedes Plutonium Analbuttfuckmanure Terrence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Ken Ribet, SAYS stalker Kibo Parry M. of 30 years nonstop. Why Kibo, because Tao, Wiles, Hales, Stillwell, Ribet, believes a single cone with 1 axis of symmetry t |

Posted: 29 Days 15 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of JG's fake math On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 12:27:57 AM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel (JG), Troll Boy) wrote: When will YOU learn, Troll Boy? JG here claims to have a discovered a s |

Posted: 29 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies The four basic operations of arithmetic using only magnitudes (geometry): https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmeti |

Posted: 29 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://www.academia.edu/67862197/How_we_got_numbers Exact Arithmetic operations using only compass and straight edge: https://www.academia.edu/74052319/The_four_basic_operations_of_Arithmetic_using_only_magnitudes_expressed_as_ratios_a |

Posted: 29 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Mainstream mathematics academics are CRANKS. They cannot be convinced even in the face of overwhelming evidence. My Geometric limit theorem of 2014 throws egg all over the faces of the vile scum in mainstream mathematics academia: https: |

Posted: 29 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over ag |

Posted: 29 Days 16 Hours ago by: Eram semper recta https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Seeing is believing, so download the following applet and watch how my historic geometric theorem works for any given function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6U |

Posted: 29 Days 17 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig 4) Ludwig Plutonium 5) Archimedes Plutonium 6) Archimedes Plutonium |

Posted: 29 Days 17 Hours ago by: olcott So the halt decider computes the halting *function* on some other basis than what its input actually specifies (What is it a mind reader?) You really don't think these things through do you? |

Posted: 29 Days 17 Hours ago by: mitchr...@gmail.com He inherited it all from Trump's brilliance. Now everything is flunking out. Compare it to Trump. It's the economy stupid. Mitchell Raemsch |

Posted: 29 Days 18 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. 1i *70i * 70i = 4900i^3 = 4.9m^3 1i *60i *60i = 3600i^3 =3.6m^3 Saluti da Socratis > 2i *4i *8i = i4^3 = 64.Litri |

Posted: 29 Days 18 Hours ago by: Socratis T.n.p. 1i *70i * 70i = 4900i^3 = 4.9m^3 1i *60i *60i = 3600i^3 =3.6m^3 Saluti da Socratis > 2i *4i *8i = i4^3 = 64.Litri |

Posted: 29 Days 20 Hours ago by: William Whoosh, The sound of WM changing the subject. By "removing them individually" you mean remove a finite set. You are correct. One cannot remove the elements of N_p without removing an infinite set. How you remove N_p has nothing to do wit |

Posted: 29 Days 20 Hours ago by: William Whoosh, The sound of WM changing the subject. By "removing them individually" you mean remove an infinite set. You are correct. One cannot remove all elements of N_p without removing an infinite set. |

Posted: 29 Days 21 Hours ago by: Michael Moroney Nymshifter, I hope you are aware that they are already making cases against some 560 or so Russian war criminals. Are you one of them? Where will you hide once the Ukrainian blue and gold flies proudly over the Kremlin? |

Posted: 29 Days 21 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse LoL Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 00:55:11 UTC+2: |

Posted: 29 Days 21 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse So my guess was right, its Luigi aka micro penis, nymshifter and Nazi friend. ruSSia is Z, Ukraine will show them !Z. The triple negation law is: !!!Z = !Z Kye Egonidis schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 00:35:14 UTC+2: |

Posted: 29 Days 21 Hours ago by: Gus Gassmann [...] Congratulations on this earth-shattering insight. Only, where the fuck did you get the notion that anyone was talking about {ℕ, ω}? |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: Kye Egonidis that's a double negation, idiot. You say "aggression" two times, since war includes aggression already. Gee, you are so stupid. |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen HA, HA! If you had done better in math, you probably wouldn't have to be prostituting yourself like this for a known war criminal. |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse If micro penis had a family, he would possibly stab his wife and his kids and then hang himself… Every Russian Oligarch Who Has Died Since Putin Invaded Ukraine—Full List https://www.newsweek.com/every-russian-oligarch-who-has-died-s |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: Ben When I looked is was your rather pointless rewriting of the conclusion. Have you removed my name from any and all of your work? How could it be? Any two things should not be quantified like that nor should the antecedent be like that. |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: Mostowski Collapse micro penis, the Nazi alcoholic, more hefti than WM and his FISONs. Now micro penis is looking for alcohol in biolabs. Boyd Papadopulos schrieb am Mittwoch, 20. April 2022 um 20:37:54 UTC+2: |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: Kye Egonidis just to realize the spread of the braindead in capitalist *moon_landing* america. Instead of laughing, they applaud in standing ovations. Biden - 'In the US military, every vehicle is going to be climate- friendly. We're spending billi |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: sergio I suggest you forget using generalizations. Extra Credit- show what is wrong with each of the following statements; 1. "A function or sequence" 2. "f(n) has domain n ∈ ℕ" 3. "It cannot be discontinuous at ω because there |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: Kye Egonidis this math challenged indolent imbecile is not knowing war is about aggression. Go fuck yourself some over places, you puerile behavioural imbecile. You don't even know what functions are along a process. |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: sergio nope, that is not right either, try again, and pay attention to Math Nomenclature. |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: Dan Christensen Don't forget, Nazi boy... WAR OF AGRESSION = NAZI. No doubt you and your boss, if he lives, will be facing the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal II. Just hope you won't be sent to a US or, worse, a Russian prison. |

Posted: 29 Days 22 Hours ago by: Kye Egonidis actually dynamics, you can't go further with big_data along your system. You need the signal, or the function. Which reveals, you nazi "ukrainian" supporters never did math and physics for real, in research, universities and similar. |

Posted: 29 Days 23 Hours ago by: Kye Egonidis you mean, you, the indolent fake_money impertinent. But I start loving Trump already. What a proper punch line, ignored by everybody that time. TRUMP TELLS NAZI ZELENSKY https://www.bitchute.com/video/USkUUfltydCA/ |

Posted: 29 Days 23 Hours ago by: Kye Egonidis how moon landing america is gonna win the nazi ukraine war: Biden - 'In the US military, every vehicle is going to be climate- friendly. We're spending billions https://www.bitchute.com/video/V08D0IobDQd0/ |

Posted: 29 Days 23 Hours ago by: Kye Egonidis another indolent on the rampage. I ran into a discussion of data in points as pairs, versus functions. And "curve fitting" is just one thing one may start investigating. As correlation, auto-correlation, FFT, Kalman filtering etc. Gue |

**1206** recent articles found.

clearneti2ptor