For the 23d of October 2022:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8

--
Wouter Valentijn

Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time

http://www.nksf.nl/

liam=mail

On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:

> For the 23d of October 2022:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8

Wow. The amount of gushing in the comments over yet *another*
Earth-based story featuring recurring enemies is quite worrying.

This is just recycled crowd-pleasing rubbish.

--
Rob
"I have never understood why it should be necessary to become irrational
in order to prove that you care, or, indeed, why it should be necessary
to prove it at all." - Avon, Blake's 7

Robert wrote on 10/10/22 7:02 am:
> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>
>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>
> Wow. The amount of gushing in the comments over yet *another*
> Earth-based story featuring recurring enemies is quite worrying.

I'm guess 'Earth-based story' is cheaper to make!!
>
> This is just recycled crowd-pleasing rubbish.
>
Would you prefer they recycled stuff that didn't please the crowd?? ;-P
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 11/10/22 2:10 am:
> In article <ti0f9c$ofrl$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Robert wrote on 10/10/22 7:02 am:
>>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>>
>>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>
>>> Wow. The amount of gushing in the comments over yet *another*
>>> Earth-based story featuring recurring enemies is quite worrying.
>>
>> I'm guess 'Earth-based story' is cheaper to make!!
>>>
>>> This is just recycled crowd-pleasing rubbish.
>>>
>> Would you prefer they recycled stuff that didn't please the crowd??
>> ;-P
>
> The whole Chibnal;l / Timeless Child is so trashy, it needs to be
> retconned!

And no matter what YOU, clown, want, it will not/can not happen, clown!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 12/10/2022 1:08 am:
> In article <ti3imr$13d18$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 11/10/22 2:10 am:
>>> In article <ti0f9c$ofrl$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> Robert wrote on 10/10/22 7:02 am:
>>>>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow. The amount of gushing in the comments over yet
>>>>> *another* Earth-based story featuring recurring enemies is
>>>>> quite worrying.
>>>>
>>>> I'm guess 'Earth-based story' is cheaper to make!!
>>>>>
>>>>> This is just recycled crowd-pleasing rubbish.
>>>>>
>>>> Would you prefer they recycled stuff that didn't please the
>>>> crowd?? ;-P
>>>
>>> The whole Chibnal;l / Timeless Child is so trashy, it needs to
>>> be retconned!
>>
>> And no matter what YOU, clown, want, it will not/can not happen,
>> clown!!

> ASK RTD, Dannyboy!

ASK RTD, WHAT, clown??

And no matter what YOU, clown, want, it will not/can not happen, clown!!
--
Daniel

On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
> For the 23d of October 2022:
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>
>

I saw nothing of it either side of Strictly.

Obviously the BBC are too ashamed of this woke garbage to promote it as
it would result in a drop in viewership of the circus show that Strictly
Come Dancing has been turned into by the BBC's unethical exploitation of
dwarves (or is it dwarfs, maybe it's an attempted tie-in with The Rings
Woke?, was expecting them to dress up as Nori Brandyfoot and Sadoc
Burrows for Movie Week), the obese, and homosexuals for what they claim
is entertainment, which has already seen its ratings plummet.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tv/19913193/strictly-come-dancing-suffers-plummeting-ratings/

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>
>>
>
> I saw nothing of it either side of Strictly.

Then you weren’t very observant. I saw it in the break between
Saturday’s The Hit List and Strictly.

( *SNIP* Aggy rambling on how he doesn’t like Strictly
and The Rings Of Power even though he keeps watching
them! But as he doesn’t seem to pay any attention to what
he sees, I suppose it doesn’t matter whether he watches
or not.)

--
solar penguin

On 12/10/2022 10:38, solar penguin wrote:
> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I saw nothing of it either side of Strictly.
>
> Then you weren’t very observant. I saw it in the break between
> Saturday’s The Hit List and Strictly.
>

I wasn't watching The Hit List. Last thing before Strictly when I turned
on was David Attenborough. If the BBC wanted viewers for Doctor Whoke
then it should have shown the trailer immediately before Strictly and
immediately after and there was nothing after Strictly except some
stupid childish CBBC show, same on Sunday, obviously not as childish as
the writing of Chris Chibnall though, who writes like a 6 year old who
has never read a book before in his life.

> ( *SNIP* Aggy rambling on how he doesn’t like Strictly
> and The Rings Of Power even though he keeps watching > them!

Since I am paying for them. Strictly has been turned into a circus show
and The Rings of Woke has been written by a pair of autistic children
with no understanding of Tolkien who are writing autistic fan-fic in
exactly the same manner as Tim, except worse, with every single
character acting, speaking, and behaving as if they were autistic too.

>
But as he doesn’t seem to pay any attention to what
> he sees, I suppose it doesn’t matter whether he watches
> or not.)
>

Like I said, I didn't see it as it ended before I started watching
Strictly, so how am I supposed to pay attention to something I didn't
watch? Yet more autistic reasoning coming from the woke far-left.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I saw nothing of it either side of Strictly.
>
> Then you weren’t very observant. I saw it in the break between
> Saturday’s The Hit List and Strictly.
>
> ( *SNIP* Aggy rambling on how he doesn’t like Strictly
> and The Rings Of Power even though he keeps watching
> them! But as he doesn’t seem to pay any attention to what
> he sees, I suppose it doesn’t matter whether he watches
> or not.)
>

His stupid rant is based on Sun logic where they are comparing against 2012
ratings and noting a small fall off from the previous series - calling this
a “plummet” - which is, of course, exactly what has happened to all long
running TV shows as the viewing landscape has fundamentally shifted,
including Doctor Who. To report on a universal trend in TV viewing as being
due to perceived specific social changes to some programmes, in order to
pursue a small minded bigoted right wing agenda, is just a bit pathetic -
on the part of both the Sun and the Wholly Greek.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The True Idiot tried to insist:

> On 12/10/2022 10:38, solar penguin wrote:
>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I saw nothing of it either side of Strictly.
>>
>> Then you weren’t very observant. I saw it in the break between
>> Saturday’s The Hit List and Strictly.
>>
>
> I wasn't watching The Hit List. Last thing before Strictly
> when I turned on was David Attenborough.

But Attenborough was only before the Sunday results show,
not the proper live Strictly with the actual dances on Saturday.

> If the BBC wanted viewers for Doctor Whoke then it
> should have shown the trailer immediately before Strictly

They did. Before the proper Strictly on Saturday. That’s
the big, prestigious slot. Not the Sunday results show.

(*SNIP* more confused rambling about other shows that
have nothing to do with the Doctor Who trailer.)

--
solar penguin

On 12/10/2022 14:44, The Last Doctor wrote:
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I saw nothing of it either side of Strictly.
>>
>> Then you weren’t very observant. I saw it in the break between
>> Saturday’s The Hit List and Strictly.
>>
>> ( *SNIP* Aggy rambling on how he doesn’t like Strictly
>> and The Rings Of Power even though he keeps watching
>> them! But as he doesn’t seem to pay any attention to what
>> he sees, I suppose it doesn’t matter whether he watches
>> or not.)
>>
>
> His stupid rant is based on Sun logic where they are comparing against 2012
> ratings and noting a small fall off from the previous series - calling this
> a “plummet” - which is, of course, exactly what has happened to all long
> running TV shows as the viewing landscape has fundamentally shifted,

More complete and utter bullshit from the uninformed far-left.

Last year Strictly had record ratings. Streaming has existed for more
than a decade and viewing habits have not changed. The programmes have
gotten worse.

Strictly has become unwatchable thanks to biased woke judging over
marking the stupid novelty and circus acts, and penalizing serious
dancers who are trying to make and effort to improve like Matt and
Nadiya
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newsbirmingham/bbc-strictly-come-dancing-star-shirley-ballas-under-for-failing-to-mask-dislike-of-contestant/ar-AA12Ss3y?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=a1b7f1fb82f642ceb2a5401e3a936811

> including Doctor Who. To report on a universal trend in TV viewing as being
> due to perceived specific social changes to some programmes, in order to
> pursue a small minded bigoted right wing agenda, is just a bit pathetic -
> on the part of both the Sun and the Wholly Greek.
>

The far-left has gone insane. Talk about bigotry when the BBC has paired
up a dwarf with a partner twice her height (when should could have been
easily partnered with another dwarf) who has to bend down and risk
damaging his back in order to hold her, and then the stupid biased
judges who have obviously being instructed to over mark the circus acts
criticise Matt Goss for not being in the correct posture. Look at the
woke hypocrisy and double standards.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 12/10/2022 19:44, solar imbecile wrote:
>
> The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/2022 10:38, solar penguin wrote:
>>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I saw nothing of it either side of Strictly.
>>>
>>> Then you weren’t very observant. I saw it in the break between
>>> Saturday’s The Hit List and Strictly.
>>>
>>
>> I wasn't watching The Hit List. Last thing before Strictly
>> when I turned on was David Attenborough.
>
> But Attenborough was only before the Sunday results show,

Nope. I recorded Saturday's show so I could skip over the boring parts
especially Claudia Winkleman and watch everything else at 1.4 times
normal speed except for the dancing and still be able to catch up in
time for the voting after starting 45 minutes later, therefore I can
prove Attenborough was on just before Strictly started followed by a
Eurovision ad. So once again the Solar Imbecile is wrong.

> not the proper live Strictly with the actual dances on Saturday.
>

Nope.

>> If the BBC wanted viewers for Doctor Whoke then it
>> should have shown the trailer immediately before Strictly
>
> They did. Before the proper Strictly on Saturday. That’s

No they did not. They showed it immediately after The Hit List but
before Attenborough and other trailers.

> the big, prestigious slot. Not the Sunday results show.

The prestigious slot was the one Attenborough was given before Strictly
was announced which is where people watching the show on a PVR or video
recording software immediately skip to.

>
> (*SNIP* more confused rambling about other shows that
> have nothing to do with the Doctor Who trailer.)
>

It is easy to confuse the solar imbecile when no one else would be
confused at all.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

The Doctor wrote on 13/10/22 1:34 am:
> In article <ti5lni$1bq50$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 12/10/2022 1:08 am:
>>> In article <ti3imr$13d18$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 11/10/22 2:10 am:
>>>>> In article <ti0f9c$ofrl$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Robert wrote on 10/10/22 7:02 am:
>>>>>>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wow. The amount of gushing in the comments over yet
>>>>>>> *another* Earth-based story featuring recurring enemies
>>>>>>> is quite worrying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm guess 'Earth-based story' is cheaper to make!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is just recycled crowd-pleasing rubbish.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you prefer they recycled stuff that didn't please
>>>>>> the crowd?? ;-P
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole Chibnal;l / Timeless Child is so trashy, it needs
>>>>> to be retconned!
>>>>
>>>> And no matter what YOU, clown, want, it will not/can not
>>>> happen, clown!!
>>
>>> ASK RTD, Dannyboy!
>>
>> ASK RTD, WHAT, clown??
>>
>> And no matter what YOU, clown, want, it will not/can not happen,
>> clown!

> word is on Facebook, Dannyboy, the retconn is coming!

Trust me, clown, I'm *NOT*holding my breath, waiting for this to happen,
clown!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 13/10/22 10:40 pm:
> In article <ti8mg5$1p15f$3@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 13/10/22 1:34 am:
>>> In article <ti5lni$1bq50$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 12/10/2022 1:08 am:
>>>>> In article <ti3imr$13d18$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 11/10/22 2:10 am:
>>>>>>> In article <ti0f9c$ofrl$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Robert wrote on 10/10/22 7:02 am:
>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wow. The amount of gushing in the comments over yet
>>>>>>>>> *another* Earth-based story featuring recurring enemies
>>>>>>>>> is quite worrying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm guess 'Earth-based story' is cheaper to make!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is just recycled crowd-pleasing rubbish.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would you prefer they recycled stuff that didn't please
>>>>>>>> the crowd?? ;-P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The whole Chibnal;l / Timeless Child is so trashy, it needs
>>>>>>> to be retconned!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And no matter what YOU, clown, want, it will not/can not
>>>>>> happen, clown!!
>>>>
>>>>> ASK RTD, Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> ASK RTD, WHAT, clown??
>>>>
>>>> And no matter what YOU, clown, want, it will not/can not happen,
>>>> clown!
>>
>>> word is on Facebook, Dannyboy, the retconn is coming!
>>
>> Trust me, clown, I'm *NOT*holding my breath, waiting for this to happen,
>> clown!!

> So what is David Tennant and Catherine record new DW, Dannyboy!

So WHAT, clown?? In "The Five Doctor's", did the first Doctor eliminate
Doctors 2, 3, 4 and 5, clown??
--
Daniel

Op 14-10-2022 om 09:11 schreef tsbr...@gmail.com:
> On Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 9:30:14 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <ab6fdd65-2130-4946...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 7:34:23 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> In article <ti5lni$1bq50$2...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 12/10/2022 1:08 am:
>>>>>> In article <ti3imr$13d18$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>> <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 11/10/22 2:10 am:
>>>>>>>> In article <ti0f9c$ofrl$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>>> <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Robert wrote on 10/10/22 7:02 am:
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2022 08:11, Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For the 23d of October 2022:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxaDzBPBuP8
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wow. The amount of gushing in the comments over yet
>>>>>>>>>> *another* Earth-based story featuring recurring enemies is
>>>>>>>>>> quite worrying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm guess 'Earth-based story' is cheaper to make!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is just recycled crowd-pleasing rubbish.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would you prefer they recycled stuff that didn't please the
>>>>>>>>> crowd?? ;-P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The whole Chibnal;l / Timeless Child is so trashy, it needs to
>>>>>>>> be retconned!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And no matter what YOU, clown, want, it will not/can not happen,
>>>>>>> clown!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ASK RTD, Dannyboy!
>>>>>
>>>>> ASK RTD, WHAT, clown??
>>>>>
>>>>> And no matter what YOU, clown, want, it will not/can not happen, clown!!
>>>
>>>> word is on Facebook, Dannyboy, the retconn is coming!
>>>
>>> Please post the links to the articles that say that the retconn is coming.
>> Have you been keeping up Timbot?
>
> My Facebook hasn't notified me of articles about the Timeless Child being retconned. Please post the links to said articles.

Mine hasn't either.

And if there are actual articles, are they from /official/ sources?
Sources that actually say that /on the record/ ?

--
Wouter Valentijn

Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time

http://www.nksf.nl/

liam=mail

The Doctor wrote on 15/10/22 12:39 am:
> In article <tiavus$21fd2$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 13/10/22 10:40 pm:
>>> In article <ti8mg5$1p15f$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 13/10/22 1:34 am:

<Snip>

>>>>> word is on Facebook, Dannyboy, the retconn is coming!
>>>>
>>>> Trust me, clown, I'm *NOT*holding my breath, waiting for this
>>>> to happen, clown!!
>>
>>> So what is David Tennant and Catherine record new DW, Dannyboy!
>>
>> So WHAT, clown?? In "The Five Doctor's", did the first Doctor
>> eliminate Doctors 2, 3, 4 and 5, clown??

> you really re out of touch, Dannyboy!

..... to understand YOU, clown?? YEAP!!
--
Daniel

Wouter Valentijn wrote on 15/10/22 6:27 am:
> Op 14-10-2022 om 09:11 schreef tsbr...@gmail.com:
>> On Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 9:30:14 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> In article <ab6fdd65-2130-4946...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 7:34:23 AM UTC-7,
>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>> word is on Facebook, Dannyboy, the retconn is coming!
>>>>
>>>> Please post the links to the articles that say that the retconn is
>>>> coming.
>>> Have you been keeping up Timbot?
>>
>> My Facebook hasn't notified me of articles about the Timeless Child
>> being retconned.  Please post the links to said articles.
>
> Mine hasn't either.
>
> And if there are actual articles, are they from /official/ sources?
> Sources that actually say that /on the record/ ?
>
WHAT?? You wouldn't be accusing the clown of some subterfuge or other,
are you, Wouter?? ;-P
--
Daniel

Daniel65 wrote:

> Wouter Valentijn wrote on 15/10/22 6:27 am:
> >
> > And if there are actual articles, are they from official sources?
> > Sources that actually say that /on the record/ ?
> >
> WHAT?? You wouldn't be accusing the clown of some subterfuge or
> other, are you, Wouter?? ;-P

At best Dave's wishful thinking is taking over. Although there are
whispers around at such a thing 'might' happen I wouldn't trust those
unofficial sources... and comments by people on Facebook would most
definitely fall in to that category.

Op 15-10-2022 om 12:56 schreef Daniel65:
> Wouter Valentijn wrote on 15/10/22 6:27 am:
>> Op 14-10-2022 om 09:11 schreef tsbr...@gmail.com:
>>> On Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 9:30:14 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> In article <ab6fdd65-2130-4946...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 7:34:23 AM UTC-7,
>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
>>>>>> word is on Facebook, Dannyboy, the retconn is coming!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please post the links to the articles that say that the retconn is
>>>>> coming.
>>>> Have you been keeping up Timbot?
>>>
>>> My Facebook hasn't notified me of articles about the Timeless Child
>>> being retconned.  Please post the links to said articles.
>>
>> Mine hasn't either.
>>
>> And if there are actual articles, are they from /official/ sources?
>> Sources that actually say that /on the record/ ?
>>
> WHAT?? You wouldn't be accusing the clown of some subterfuge or other,
> are you, Wouter?? ;-P

I'm not making any claims. I am merely expressing my curiosity.

--
Wouter Valentijn

Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time

http://www.nksf.nl/

liam=mail

On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 7:24:51 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <tie52f$2mpek$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >Daniel65 wrote:
> >
> >> Wouter Valentijn wrote on 15/10/22 6:27 am:
> >> >
> >> > And if there are actual articles, are they from official sources?
> >> > Sources that actually say that /on the record/ ?
> >> >
> >> WHAT?? You wouldn't be accusing the clown of some subterfuge or
> >> other, are you, Wouter?? ;-P
> >
> >At best Dave's wishful thinking is taking over. Although there are
> >whispers around at such a thing 'might' happen I wouldn't trust those
> >unofficial sources... and comments by people on Facebook would most
> >definitely fall in to that category.
> LEt's see next week.
> --
> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
> Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
> Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
> Why are so many happy only when controlling others? -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

high five, popcorn!!! 🐶🐶🐶

Op 16-10-2022 om 13:54 schreef The Doctor:
> In article <3d3c866b-4f8d-499b-8d0d-22bdb7a2dbb1n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 2:01:37 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <d3e5e5b1-03de-486b...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> Rachel <roac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 7:24:51 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> In article <tie52f$2mpek$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wouter Valentijn wrote on 15/10/22 6:27 am:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And if there are actual articles, are they from official sources?
>>>>>>>> Sources that actually say that /on the record/ ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WHAT?? You wouldn't be accusing the clown of some subterfuge or
>>>>>>> other, are you, Wouter?? ;-P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At best Dave's wishful thinking is taking over. Although there are
>>>>>> whispers around at such a thing 'might' happen I wouldn't trust those
>>>>>> unofficial sources... and comments by people on Facebook would most
>>>>>> definitely fall in to that category.
>>>>> LEt's see next week.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
>>>>> Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
>>>> AntiChrist rising!
>>>>> Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>> https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
>>>>> Why are so many happy only when controlling others? -unknown Beware
>>>> https://mindspring.com
>>>>
>>>> high five, popcorn!!! 🐶🐶🐶
>>> Thank you!
>>
>> I see Non Cracking Popcorn!
>
>
>
> If the original post is over a month old,
> Tim's desparate spamtrolling, noted!
>
> Why are you marking your arm in Is and IIII/s Tim?
>
> Depeer Google groups now!

The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of October of 2022.
Which was last week.

--
Wouter Valentijn

Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time

http://www.nksf.nl/

liam=mail

The Doctor wrote on 17/10/22 8:13 am:
> In article <jr31mjFndgmU3@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
> <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>> Op 16-10-2022 om 13:54 schreef The Doctor:
>>> In article
>>> <3d3c866b-4f8d-499b-8d0d-22bdb7a2dbb1n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 2:01:37 PM UTC-7,
>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> In article <d3e5e5b1-03de-486b...@googlegroups.com>, Rachel
>>>>> <roac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 7:24:51 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <tie52f$2mpek$1...@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>>>>>> <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Wouter Valentijn wrote on 15/10/22 6:27 am:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And if there are actual articles, are they from
>>>>>>>>>> official sources? Sources that actually say that
>>>>>>>>>> /on the record/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WHAT?? You wouldn't be accusing the clown of some
>>>>>>>>> subterfuge or other, are you, Wouter?? ;-P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At best Dave's wishful thinking is taking over.
>>>>>>>> Although there are whispers around at such a thing
>>>>>>>> 'might' happen I wouldn't trust those unofficial
>>>>>>>> sources... and comments by people on Facebook would
>>>>>>>> most definitely fall in to that category.
>>>>>>> LEt's see next week. -- Member - Liberal International
>>>>>>> This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca Yahweh, King &
>>>>>>> country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
>>>>>> AntiChrist rising!
>>>>>>> Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>>>> https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
>>>>>>> Why are so many happy only when controlling others?
>>>>>>> -unknown Beware
>>>>>> https://mindspring.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> high five, popcorn!!! 🐶🐶🐶
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> I see Non Cracking Popcorn!
>>>
>>> If the original post is over a month old, Tim's desparate
>>> spamtrolling, noted!
>>>
>>> Why are you marking your arm in Is and IIII/s Tim?
>>>
>>> Depeer Google groups now!
>>
>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of October of
>> 2022. Which was last week.
>
> What is that about conditionals?

YOU, asswipe, are the one putting "conditionals" on postings here,
asswipe ..... and YOU, asswipe, are the one bitching about these
"conditionals", asswipe!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 17/10/22 10:59 am:
> In article <0a96c6d4-ae56-4128-a897-8e0e495f23b7n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 2:13:44 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> In article <jr31mj...@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>> <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of
>>>> October of 2022. Which was last week.
>>>>
>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>
>> If the original post doesn't meet your conditions for noting my
>> "desparate spamtrolling", why go to the trouble of noting it?
>
> You really are dense Tim!
>
Yes, Tim, you are dime in not realising that the asswipe doesn't really
worry about what he (or anyone else) posts .... as long as the asswipe
gets to post!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 18/10/22 1:10 am:
> In article <tij71r$3dldr$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 17/10/22 10:59 am:
>>> In article <0a96c6d4-ae56-4128-a897-8e0e495f23b7n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 2:13:44 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> In article <jr31mj...@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>>>> <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of
>>>>>> October of 2022. Which was last week.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>>>
>>>> If the original post doesn't meet your conditions for noting my
>>>> "desparate spamtrolling", why go to the trouble of noting it?
>>>
>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>
>> Yes, Tim, you are dime in not realising that the asswipe doesn't really
>> worry about what he (or anyone else) posts .... as long as the asswipe
>> gets to post!!
>
> Foul mouth Dannyboy cannot get the equation correct, nor the scenario.

What equation, clown?? What scenario, clown??
--
Daniel

Op 16-10-2022 om 23:13 schreef The Doctor:
> In article <jr31mjFndgmU3@mid.individual.net>,
> Wouter Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>> Op 16-10-2022 om 13:54 schreef The Doctor:
>>> In article <3d3c866b-4f8d-499b-8d0d-22bdb7a2dbb1n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 2:01:37 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> In article <d3e5e5b1-03de-486b...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> Rachel <roac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 7:24:51 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <tie52f$2mpek$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wouter Valentijn wrote on 15/10/22 6:27 am:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And if there are actual articles, are they from official sources?
>>>>>>>>>> Sources that actually say that /on the record/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WHAT?? You wouldn't be accusing the clown of some subterfuge or
>>>>>>>>> other, are you, Wouter?? ;-P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At best Dave's wishful thinking is taking over. Although there are
>>>>>>>> whispers around at such a thing 'might' happen I wouldn't trust those
>>>>>>>> unofficial sources... and comments by people on Facebook would most
>>>>>>>> definitely fall in to that category.
>>>>>>> LEt's see next week.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
>>>>>>> Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
>>>>>> AntiChrist rising!
>>>>>>> Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>>>> https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
>>>>>>> Why are so many happy only when controlling others? -unknown Beware
>>>>>> https://mindspring.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> high five, popcorn!!! 🐶🐶🐶
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> I see Non Cracking Popcorn!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If the original post is over a month old,
>>> Tim's desparate spamtrolling, noted!
>>>
>>> Why are you marking your arm in Is and IIII/s Tim?
>>>
>>> Depeer Google groups now!
>>
>>
>>
>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of October of 2022.
>> Which was last week.
>>
>
> What is that about conditionals?
>

Within the context of the date of this thread irrelevant.
As for the conditionals themselves, if the post is on-topic it is
relevant to the group.

--
Wouter Valentijn

Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time

http://www.nksf.nl/

liam=mail