Op 17-10-2022 om 11:51 schreef tsbru...@gmail.com:
> On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 2:25:17 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 17/10/22 10:59 am:
>>> In article <0a96c6d4-ae56-4128...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 2:13:44 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> In article <jr31mj...@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>>>> <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>> <Snip>
>>>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of
>>>>>> October of 2022. Which was last week.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>>>
>>>> If the original post doesn't meet your conditions for noting my
>>>> "desparate spamtrolling", why go to the trouble of noting it?
>>>
>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>
>> Yes, Tim, you are dime in not realising that the asswipe doesn't really
>> worry about what he (or anyone else) posts .... as long as the asswipe
>> gets to post!!
>
> I am 10 cents?

Maybe that's your rapper name? ;-)

--
Wouter Valentijn

Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time

http://www.nksf.nl/

liam=mail

The Doctor wrote on 19/10/2022 1:43 am:
> In article <tilrag$3n1tc$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 18/10/22 1:10 am:
>>> In article <tij71r$3dldr$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/10/22 10:59 am:
>>>>> In article
>>>>> <0a96c6d4-ae56-4128-a897-8e0e495f23b7n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 2:13:44 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <jr31mj...@mid.individual.net>, Wouter
>>>>>>> Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th
>>>>>>>> of October of 2022. Which was last week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the original post doesn't meet your conditions for
>>>>>> noting my "desparate spamtrolling", why go to the trouble
>>>>>> of noting it?
>>>>>
>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, Tim, you are dime in not realising that the asswipe
>>>> doesn't really worry about what he (or anyone else) posts ....
>>>> as long as the asswipe gets to post!!
>>>
>>> Foul mouth Dannyboy cannot get the equation correct, nor the
>>> scenario.
>>
>> What equation, clown?? What scenario, clown??

> The scenario about conditionals, Dannyboy!

What scenario, asswipe??
What conditionals, asswipe??
What equation, asswipe??

The questions, which YOU, asswipe, are apparently, are UNABLE to answer,
asswipe, are mounting, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

Op 18-10-2022 om 23:35 schreef The Doctor:
> In article <jr8anmFhvhsU2@mid.individual.net>,
> Wouter Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>> Op 16-10-2022 om 23:13 schreef The Doctor:
>>> In article <jr31mjFndgmU3@mid.individual.net>,
>>> Wouter Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>> Op 16-10-2022 om 13:54 schreef The Doctor:
>>>>> In article <3d3c866b-4f8d-499b-8d0d-22bdb7a2dbb1n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 2:01:37 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <d3e5e5b1-03de-486b...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> Rachel <roac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 7:24:51 AM UTC-7,
>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <tie52f$2mpek$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Wouter Valentijn wrote on 15/10/22 6:27 am:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And if there are actual articles, are they from official sources?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sources that actually say that /on the record/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> WHAT?? You wouldn't be accusing the clown of some subterfuge or
>>>>>>>>>>> other, are you, Wouter?? ;-P
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At best Dave's wishful thinking is taking over. Although there are
>>>>>>>>>> whispers around at such a thing 'might' happen I wouldn't trust those
>>>>>>>>>> unofficial sources... and comments by people on Facebook would most
>>>>>>>>>> definitely fall in to that category.
>>>>>>>>> LEt's see next week.
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
>>>>>>>>> Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
>>>>>>>> AntiChrist rising!
>>>>>>>>> Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>>>>>> https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
>>>>>>>>> Why are so many happy only when controlling others? -unknown Beware
>>>>>>>> https://mindspring.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> high five, popcorn!!! 🐶🐶🐶
>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see Non Cracking Popcorn!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If the original post is over a month old,
>>>>> Tim's desparate spamtrolling, noted!
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you marking your arm in Is and IIII/s Tim?
>>>>>
>>>>> Depeer Google groups now!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of October of 2022.
>>>> Which was last week.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Within the context of the date of this thread irrelevant.
>> As for the conditionals themselves, if the post is on-topic it is
>> relevant to the group.
>>
>>
>
> The If in the above statement is a conditional.
>

Personally I don't think a month is really that old.

And who established the conditional? And when?

--
Wouter Valentijn

Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time

http://www.nksf.nl/

liam=mail

The Doctor wrote on 19/10/22 11:53 pm:
> In article <tio60v$3vtfp$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/10/2022 1:43 am:
>>> In article <tilrag$3n1tc$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 18/10/22 1:10 am:
>>>>> In article <tij71r$3dldr$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/10/22 10:59 am:
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> <0a96c6d4-ae56-4128-a897-8e0e495f23b7n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 2:13:44 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <jr31mj...@mid.individual.net>, Wouter
>>>>>>>>> Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th
>>>>>>>>>> of October of 2022. Which was last week.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If the original post doesn't meet your conditions for
>>>>>>>> noting my "desparate spamtrolling", why go to the trouble
>>>>>>>> of noting it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, Tim, you are dime in not realising that the asswipe
>>>>>> doesn't really worry about what he (or anyone else) posts ....
>>>>>> as long as the asswipe gets to post!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Foul mouth Dannyboy cannot get the equation correct, nor the
>>>>> scenario.
>>>>
>>>> What equation, clown?? What scenario, clown??
>>
>>> The scenario about conditionals, Dannyboy!
>>
>> What scenario, asswipe??
>> What conditionals, asswipe??
>> What equation, asswipe??
>>
>> The questions, which YOU, asswipe, are apparently, are UNABLE to answer,
>> asswipe, are mounting, asswipe!!
>
> cut-and-lie foul-mouth Dannyboy in action.

Oh!! Just in case YOU, asswipe, missed that questions that I asked (and
which, of course, YOU, asswipe, failed to answer!!), I'll re-post them
for YOU, asswipe!!

Quote
What scenario, asswipe??
What conditionals, asswipe??
What equation, asswipe??

The questions, which YOU, asswipe, are apparently, are UNABLE to answer,
asswipe, are mounting, asswipe!!
End Quote
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 20/10/22 7:35 am:
> In article <jrae0pFrthoU1@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
> <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>> Op 18-10-2022 om 23:35 schreef The Doctor:
>>> In article <jr8anmFhvhsU2@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>> <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>> Op 16-10-2022 om 23:13 schreef The Doctor:
>>>>> In article <jr31mjFndgmU3@mid.individual.net>, Wouter
>>>>> Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of
>>>>>> October of 2022. Which was last week.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>>>
>>>> Within the context of the date of this thread irrelevant. As
>>>> for the conditionals themselves, if the post is on-topic it is
>>>> relevant to the group.
>>>
>>> The If in the above statement is a conditional.
>>
>> Personally I don't think a month is really that old.
>>
>> And who established the conditional? And when?
>
> Tim by his spamtrolling!

Buggered if I can recall Tim mentioning 'conditional' in any of his
posts .... until YOU, asswipe, started using that term, asswipe .... for
some reason or other, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 20/10/22 10:49 pm:
> In article <tir42q$a5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 20/10/22 7:35 am:
>>> In article <jrae0pFrthoU1@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>> <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>> Op 18-10-2022 om 23:35 schreef The Doctor:
>>>>> In article <jr8anmFhvhsU2@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>>>> <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>>> Op 16-10-2022 om 23:13 schreef The Doctor:
>>>>>>> In article <jr31mjFndgmU3@mid.individual.net>, Wouter
>>>>>>> Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of
>>>>>>>> October of 2022. Which was last week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Within the context of the date of this thread irrelevant. As
>>>>>> for the conditionals themselves, if the post is on-topic it is
>>>>>> relevant to the group.
>>>>>
>>>>> The If in the above statement is a conditional.
>>>>
>>>> Personally I don't think a month is really that old.
>>>>
>>>> And who established the conditional? And when?
>>>
>>> Tim by his spamtrolling!
>>
>> Buggered if I can recall Tim mentioning 'conditional' in any of his
>> posts .... until YOU, asswipe, started using that term, asswipe .... for
>> some reason or other, asswipe!!
>
> Looks you really fould up fould-mouth Dannyboy!

"fould"??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 22/10/22 2:16 am:
> In article <titoqs$jmmg$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 20/10/22 10:49 pm:
>>> In article <tir42q$a5m4$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 20/10/22 7:35 am:
>>>>> In article <jrae0pFrthoU1@mid.individual.net>, Wouter
>>>>> Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>>> Op 18-10-2022 om 23:35 schreef The Doctor:
>>>>>>> In article <jr8anmFhvhsU2@mid.individual.net>, Wouter
>>>>>>> Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Op 16-10-2022 om 23:13 schreef The Doctor:
>>>>>>>>> In article <jr31mjFndgmU3@mid.individual.net>,
>>>>>>>>> Wouter Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the
>>>>>>>>>> 9th of October of 2022. Which was last week.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Within the context of the date of this thread
>>>>>>>> irrelevant. As for the conditionals themselves, if the
>>>>>>>> post is on-topic it is relevant to the group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The If in the above statement is a conditional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Personally I don't think a month is really that old.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And who established the conditional? And when?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim by his spamtrolling!
>>>>
>>>> Buggered if I can recall Tim mentioning 'conditional' in any of
>>>> his posts .... until YOU, asswipe, started using that term,
>>>> asswipe .... for some reason or other, asswipe!!
>>>
>>> Looks you really fowled up foul-mouth Dannyboy!
>>
>> "fould"?? -- Daniel
>
> Better?
>
Your word content, sure, asswipe, but your content with-in this
discussion, nope, not a bit, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

The asswipe asked:

> In article <titoqs$jmmg$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 20/10/22 10:49 pm:
>>> In article <tir42q$a5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 20/10/22 7:35 am:
>>>>> In article <jrae0pFrthoU1@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>>>> <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>>> Op 18-10-2022 om 23:35 schreef The Doctor:
>>>>>>> In article <jr8anmFhvhsU2@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>>>>>> <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Op 16-10-2022 om 23:13 schreef The Doctor:
>>>>>>>>> In article <jr31mjFndgmU3@mid.individual.net>, Wouter
>>>>>>>>> Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The original post of this thread was made on the 9th of
>>>>>>>>>> October of 2022. Which was last week.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is that about conditionals?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Within the context of the date of this thread irrelevant. As
>>>>>>>> for the conditionals themselves, if the post is on-topic it is
>>>>>>>> relevant to the group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The If in the above statement is a conditional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Personally I don't think a month is really that old.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And who established the conditional? And when?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim by his spamtrolling!
>>>>
>>>> Buggered if I can recall Tim mentioning 'conditional'
>>>> in any of his posts .... until YOU, asswipe, started
>>>> using that term, asswipe .... for some reason or other,
>>>> asswipe!!
>>>
>>> Looks you really fowled up foul-mouth Dannyboy!

Liar! That isn’t what you posted!

>>
>> "fould"??
>
> Better?

Not really. It’s still gibberish.

What is ‘fowled up’ supposed to mean? Did Daniel hold a
chicken in the air? (And if so, did he go on to stick a deckchair
up his nose, buy a jumbo jet and then bury all his clothes?)

--
solar penguin

The asswipe asked:

> In article <tj0eki$svii$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The asswipe asked:
>>
>>> In article <titoqs$jmmg$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 20/10/22 10:49 pm:
>>>>> In article <tir42q$a5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Buggered if I can recall Tim mentioning 'conditional'
>>>>>> in any of his posts .... until YOU, asswipe, started
>>>>>> using that term, asswipe .... for some reason or other,
>>>>>> asswipe!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks you really fowled up foul-mouth Dannyboy!
>>
>> Liar! That isn’t what you posted!
>>
>>>>
>>>> "fould"??
>>>
>>> Better?
>>
>> Not really. It’s still gibberish.
>>
>> What is ‘fowled up’ supposed to mean? Did Daniel hold
>> a chicken in the air? (And if so, did he go on to stick
>> a deckchair up his nose, buy a jumbo jet and then bury
>> all his clothes?)
>>
>
> Or Daniel is holding up a Solar Penguin in the air!
>

That’s not how the song goes!

--
solar penguin

The asswipe asserted:

> In article <tj12mf$ujgv$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The asswipe asked:
>>
>>> In article <tj0eki$svii$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The asswipe asked:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <titoqs$jmmg$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 20/10/22 10:49 pm:
>>>>>>> In article <tir42q$a5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Buggered if I can recall Tim mentioning 'conditional'
>>>>>>>> in any of his posts .... until YOU, asswipe, started
>>>>>>>> using that term, asswipe .... for some reason or other,
>>>>>>>> asswipe!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks you really fowled up foul-mouth Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> Liar! That isn’t what you posted!
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "fould"??
>>>>>
>>>>> Better?
>>>>
>>>> Not really. It’s still gibberish.
>>>>
>>>> What is ‘fowled up’ supposed to mean? Did Daniel
>>>> hold a chicken in the air? (And if so, did he go on
>>>> to stick a deckchair up his nose, buy a jumbo jet
>>>> and then bury all his clothes?)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Or Daniel is holding up a Solar Penguin in the air!
>>>
>>
>> That's not how the song goes!
>
> Caught the bird off guard!
>

**WHOOSH**

--
solar penguin

On Sunday, 23 October 2022 at 11:10:17 UTC+1, Tim typed:

> On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 2:54:28 AM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>
> >
> > What is ‘fowled up’ supposed to mean? Did Daniel hold a
> > chicken in the air? (And if so, did he go on to stick a deckchair
> > up his nose, buy a jumbo jet and then bury all his clothes?)
>
> Why would Daniel do something so weird?

They're lyrics from The Chicken Song.

"Hold a chicken in the air
Stick a deckchair up your nose
Buy a jumbo jet
And then bury all your clothes
Paint your left knee green
Then extract your wisdom teeth
Form a string quartet
And pretend your name is Keith
Skin yourself alive
Learn to speak Arapahoe
Climb inside a dog
And behead an Eskimo
Eat a Renault Four
Wear salami in your ears
Casserole your gran
Disembowel yourself with spears"