How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0

Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively banning
them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers, and all manner
of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their identities from
witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more businesses are refusing
entry to anyone wearing a mask.

If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to their
online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an appointment to
shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out of luck.

Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they want",
are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation of their
rights.

In article <HJqdnbgMIZdXvaf-nZ2dnZfqn_hj4p2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like this:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>
> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively banning
> them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers, and all manner
> of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their identities from
> witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more businesses are refusing
> entry to anyone wearing a mask.
>
> If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
> because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
> evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to their
> online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an appointment to
> shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out of luck.
>
> Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
> pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they want",
> are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation of their
> rights.

The above sure looks like a screeching meltdown to me. Why do you care
if some people still wear a mask? What possible difference does it
make? Why call them names like "hysterical mask fanatics" if they're
simply wearing masks? I'd agree that, at this point, if someone in a
store gave you grief for not wearing one, you'd have an excuse to start
calling them names. Has this happened to you? It hasn't to me.

BTW you are going to have people wearing a mask this time of year in an
attempt to avoid catching the flu. There have always been a few such,
and I expect there will be more this year, as the idea of wearing a
mask in the store is not as odd as it used to be.

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like this:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>
> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively banning
them due to explosion in property crime.

I didn’t think you had property crime in the Pueblo de Los Angeles?

Meanwhile, our mask wearing is on the upswing again. I got a terrified Uber
driver last week who didn’t like that I coughed and said she was going to
drive me home as fast as she possibly could because she had a baby girl at
home.

Shoplifters, robbers, and all manner
of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their identities
from
witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more businesses are
refusing
entry to anyone wearing a mask.
>
> If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to their
online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an appointment
to
shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out of luck.
>
> Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they
want",
are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation of their
rights.
>

>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

In article <021020222223322912%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <HJqdnbgMIZdXvaf-nZ2dnZfqn_hj4p2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
> > this:
> >
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
> >
> > Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively banning
> > them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers, and all
> > manner of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their
> > identities from witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more
> > businesses are refusing entry to anyone wearing a mask.
> >
> > If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
> > because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
> > evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to their
> > online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an appointment
> > to
> > shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out of luck.
> >
> > Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
> > pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they
> > want", are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation
> > of their rights.
>
> The above sure looks like a screeching meltdown to me.

You should probably see a specialist about that.

> Why do you care if some people still wear a mask? What possible difference
> does it make?

Well, as noted, a possible difference is that they stand a good chance
of being a criminal about to stick up the place.

> BTW you are going to have people wearing a mask this time of year in an
> attempt to avoid catching the flu.

Then they're going to have to shop online at an increasing number of
stores here.

On 10/2/2022 6:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like this:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>
> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore,

You've shown a dropbox image of one store, not "stores". Lie #1

You've shown no proof of location. Lie #2

The graphic is just badly superimposed on a window. Lie #3.

Conclusion: this is just another shitpost.

On 10/2/2022 9:23 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <HJqdnbgMIZdXvaf-nZ2dnZfqn_hj4p2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like this:
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>>
>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively banning
>> them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers, and all manner
>> of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their identities from
>> witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more businesses are refusing
>> entry to anyone wearing a mask.
>>
>> If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
>> because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
>> evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to their
>> online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an appointment to
>> shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out of luck.
>>
>> Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
>> pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they want",
>> are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation of their
>> rights.
>
>
> The above sure looks like a screeching meltdown to me. Why do you care
> if some people still wear a mask? What possible difference does it
> make?

His mental masturbation sessions become besmirched.

Why call them names like "hysterical mask fanatics" if they're
> simply wearing masks? I'd agree that, at this point, if someone in a
> store gave you grief for not wearing one, you'd have an excuse to start
> calling them names. Has this happened to you? It hasn't to me.
>
> BTW you are going to have people wearing a mask this time of year in an
> attempt to avoid catching the flu. There have always been a few such,
> and I expect there will be more this year, as the idea of wearing a
> mask in the store is not as odd as it used to be.

You seem to have forgotten the Oath Keepers motto: facts suck.

On 10/2/2022 10:47 PM, RichA wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 October 2022 at 19:37:56 UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like this:
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>>
>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively banning
>> them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers, and all manner
>> of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their identities from
>> witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more businesses are refusing
>> entry to anyone wearing a mask.
>>
>> If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
>> because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
>> evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to their
>> online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an appointment to
>> shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out of luck.
>>
>> Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
>> pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they want",
>> are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation of their
>> rights.
>
> Chinoids will be disappointed. They like wearing masks.

And the shitposting continues...

In article <atropos-5B3C41.22291902102022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <021020222223322912%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <HJqdnbgMIZdXvaf-nZ2dnZfqn_hj4p2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > > How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
> > > this:
> > >
> > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
> > >
> > > Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively
> > > banning
> > > them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers, and all
> > > manner of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their
> > > identities from witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more
> > > businesses are refusing entry to anyone wearing a mask.
> > >
> > > If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
> > > because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
> > > evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to
> > > their
> > > online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an
> > > appointment
> > > to
> > > shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out of luck.
> > >
> > > Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
> > > pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they
> > > want", are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation
> > > of their rights.
> >
> > The above sure looks like a screeching meltdown to me.
>
> You should probably see a specialist about that.

You do specialize in screeching meltdowns, and here we all are.

> > Why do you care if some people still wear a mask? What possible difference
> > does it make?
>
> Well, as noted, a possible difference is that they stand a good chance
> of being a criminal about to stick up the place.

Watch out for that old lady in the mask! She may be armed!

Do you think that masks suddenly became a thing for robbers during the
pandemic?

> > BTW you are going to have people wearing a mask this time of year in an
> > attempt to avoid catching the flu.
>
> Then they're going to have to shop online at an increasing number of
> stores here.

The prohibition will last until people complain and the stores start
losing money.

In article <thea36$14cd$1@gioia.aioe.org>, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:

> On 10/2/2022 6:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
> > this:
> >
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
> >
> > Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore,
>
>
> You've shown a dropbox image of one store, not "stores". Lie #1
>
> You've shown no proof of location. Lie #2
>
> The graphic is just badly superimposed on a window. Lie #3.
>
>
> Conclusion: this is just another shitpost.

Creating that sign, if it were real, would have cost several hundred
dollars. OTOH Kitson, the store in question, has been pulling bizarre
shit for a while now.

https://www.thecut.com/2021/08/the-red-pilling-of-kitson-fraser-ross.htm
l

In article <031020220840368565%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <atropos-5B3C41.22291902102022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <021020222223322912%nope@noway.com>,
> > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <HJqdnbgMIZdXvaf-nZ2dnZfqn_hj4p2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
> > > > this:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
> > > >
> > > > Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively
> > > > banning them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers,
> > > > and all manner of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide
> > > > their identities from witnesses and security cameras, so now more and
> > > > more businesses are refusing entry to anyone wearing a mask.
> > > >
> > > > If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
> > > > because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
> > > > evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to
> > > > their online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an
> > > > appointment to shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out
> > > > of luck.
> > > >
> > > > Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
> > > > pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they
> > > > want", are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation
> > > > of their rights.

> > > BTW you are going to have people wearing a mask this time of year in an
> > > attempt to avoid catching the flu.
> >
> > Then they're going to have to shop online at an increasing number of
> > stores here.
>
> The prohibition will last until people complain and the stores start
> losing money.

People are already complaining-- about their 'rights'-- the same people
who said rights don't matter when the masks were required. And yet the
bans persist and grow.

And the stores lose a helluva lot more money from the rampant
shoplifting than they do from the few customers who still are obsessed
with wearing masks.

On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 10:08:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>In article <031020220840368565%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <atropos-5B3C41.22291902102022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <021020222223322912%nope@noway.com>,
>> > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > In article <HJqdnbgMIZdXvaf-nZ2dnZfqn_hj4p2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
>> > > > this:
>> > > >
>> > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>> > > >
>> > > > Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively
>> > > > banning them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers,
>> > > > and all manner of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide
>> > > > their identities from witnesses and security cameras, so now more and
>> > > > more businesses are refusing entry to anyone wearing a mask.
>> > > >
>> > > > If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
>> > > > because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
>> > > > evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to
>> > > > their online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an
>> > > > appointment to shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out
>> > > > of luck.
>> > > >
>> > > > Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
>> > > > pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they
>> > > > want", are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation
>> > > > of their rights.
>
>> > > BTW you are going to have people wearing a mask this time of year in an
>> > > attempt to avoid catching the flu.
>> >
>> > Then they're going to have to shop online at an increasing number of
>> > stores here.
>>
>> The prohibition will last until people complain and the stores start
>> losing money.
>
>People are already complaining-- about their 'rights'-- the same people
>who said rights don't matter when the masks were required. And yet the
>bans persist and grow.
>
>And the stores lose a helluva lot more money from the rampant
>shoplifting than they do from the few customers who still are obsessed
>with wearing masks.

Does it matter if the shoplifters wear a mask or not when no one is
allowed to stop them and the cops won't bother to arrest them?

On Sun, 02 Oct 2022 22:23:32 -0400, A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

>The above sure looks like a screeching meltdown to me. Why do you care
>if some people still wear a mask? What possible difference does it
>make? Why call them names like "hysterical mask fanatics" if they're
>simply wearing masks? I'd agree that, at this point, if someone in a
>store gave you grief for not wearing one, you'd have an excuse to start
>calling them names. Has this happened to you? It hasn't to me.

I haven't worn a mask since our medical health officer said it was no
longer needed. (I've got my 3 shots and am waiting until the
'bivalent' vaccine or whatever it's called is available, despite two
of my family having had it - one of them 8000 miles away from me - and
a third testing positive.)

I'm being careful and when I'm in the grocery store and see a masked
person I normally keep my distance as one just doesn't need the hassle
of risking a confrontation. I've had a few friendly gestures from
masked folks who understand what I'm doing.

Anybody wanting to go postal on me will get back as good as they give
but so far so good.

On 10/3/2022 1:10 PM, shawn wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 10:08:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <031020220840368565%nope@noway.com>,
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <atropos-5B3C41.22291902102022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <021020222223322912%nope@noway.com>,
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <HJqdnbgMIZdXvaf-nZ2dnZfqn_hj4p2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
>>>>>> this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively
>>>>>> banning them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers,
>>>>>> and all manner of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide
>>>>>> their identities from witnesses and security cameras, so now more and
>>>>>> more businesses are refusing entry to anyone wearing a mask.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
>>>>>> because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
>>>>>> evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to
>>>>>> their online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an
>>>>>> appointment to shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out
>>>>>> of luck.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
>>>>>> pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they
>>>>>> want", are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation
>>>>>> of their rights.
>>
>>>>> BTW you are going to have people wearing a mask this time of year in an
>>>>> attempt to avoid catching the flu.
>>>>
>>>> Then they're going to have to shop online at an increasing number of
>>>> stores here.
>>>
>>> The prohibition will last until people complain and the stores start
>>> losing money.
>>
>> People are already complaining-- about their 'rights'-- the same people
>> who said rights don't matter when the masks were required. And yet the
>> bans persist and grow.
>>
>> And the stores lose a helluva lot more money from the rampant
>> shoplifting than they do from the few customers who still are obsessed
>> with wearing masks.
>
> Does it matter if the shoplifters wear a mask or not when no one is
> allowed to stop them and the cops won't bother to arrest them?

We may be hearing a tale of two cities, Frisco and L.A. ...

atropos@mac.com wrote:

> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively banning
> them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers, and all
> manner of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their
> identities from witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more
> businesses are refusing entry to anyone wearing a mask.

Isn't it a Moot Point if they never arrest or charge people?

--
Let's go Brandon!

nope@noway.com wrote:
> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like this:
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>>
>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively banning
>> them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers, and all manner
>> of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their identities from
>> witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more businesses are refusing
>> entry to anyone wearing a mask.
>>
>> If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
>> because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
>> evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to their
>> online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an appointment to
>> shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out of luck.
>>
>> Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
>> pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they want",
>> are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation of their
>> rights.
>
>The above sure looks like a screeching meltdown to me.

Strawman noted.

--
Let's go Brandon!

> A Friend
> > BTR1701
> >
> > Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
> > pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they want",
> > are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation of their
> > rights.
>
> The above sure looks like a screeching meltdown to me. Why do you
> care if some people still wear a mask? What possible difference does
> it make? Why call them names like "hysterical mask fanatics" if they're
> simply wearing masks?

The issue isn't people choosing to wear masks (other then criminals using
covid masks as an opportunity) it's Covid Commies demanding that we
all still be forced to wear masks 24/7/365.

I still see the occasional dumbass driving down the road in their own car
with the windows rolled up wearing a face diaper and other then laughing
at their paranoia, I don't have a problem with this but those types of people
saying _I_ need to be wearing a mask, well fuck them.

On 10/3/2022 7:40 AM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <atropos-5B3C41.22291902102022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <021020222223322912%nope@noway.com>,
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <HJqdnbgMIZdXvaf-nZ2dnZfqn_hj4p2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
>>>> this:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>>>>
>>>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively
>>>> banning
>>>> them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers, and all
>>>> manner of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide their
>>>> identities from witnesses and security cameras, so now more and more
>>>> businesses are refusing entry to anyone wearing a mask.
>>>>
>>>> If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
>>>> because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
>>>> evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to
>>>> their
>>>> online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an
>>>> appointment
>>>> to
>>>> shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out of luck.
>>>>
>>>> Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
>>>> pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they
>>>> want", are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation
>>>> of their rights.
>>>
>>> The above sure looks like a screeching meltdown to me.
>>
>> You should probably see a specialist about that.
>
>
> You do specialize in screeching meltdowns, and here we all are.
>
>
>>> Why do you care if some people still wear a mask? What possible difference
>>> does it make?
>>
>> Well, as noted, a possible difference is that they stand a good chance
>> of being a criminal about to stick up the place.
>
>
> Watch out for that old lady in the mask! She may be armed!

Armed? It could be worse than that, it could be someone on their way to
the show the masked singer.

> Do you think that masks suddenly became a thing for robbers during the
> pandemic?

Isn't that when they first came up with Nixon masks? At the behest of
Roger Stone maybe?

>>> BTW you are going to have people wearing a mask this time of year in an
>>> attempt to avoid catching the flu.
>>
>> Then they're going to have to shop online at an increasing number of
>> stores here.
>
>
> The prohibition will last until people complain and the stores start
> losing money.

Eunuch Derp is hiding under a chair at this point.

On 10/3/2022 8:04 AM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <thea36$14cd$1@gioia.aioe.org>, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/2/2022 6:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
>>> this:
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>>>
>>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore,
>>
>>
>> You've shown a dropbox image of one store, not "stores". Lie #1
>>
>> You've shown no proof of location. Lie #2
>>
>> The graphic is just badly superimposed on a window. Lie #3.
>>
>>
>> Conclusion: this is just another shitpost.
>
>
> Creating that sign, if it were real, would have cost several hundred
> dollars. OTOH Kitson, the store in question, has been pulling bizarre
> shit for a while now.
>
> https://www.thecut.com/2021/08/the-red-pilling-of-kitson-fraser-ross.htm
> l

That sign looked phony as fuck. The quality control at right wing
dickhead HQ isn't too good.

On 10/3/2022 12:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <031020220840368565%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <atropos-5B3C41.22291902102022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <021020222223322912%nope@noway.com>,
>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <HJqdnbgMIZdXvaf-nZ2dnZfqn_hj4p2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
>>>>> this:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>>>>>
>>>>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore, they're actively
>>>>> banning them due to explosion in property crime. Shoplifters, robbers,
>>>>> and all manner of criminals are using the excuse to wear a mask to hide
>>>>> their identities from witnesses and security cameras, so now more and
>>>>> more businesses are refusing entry to anyone wearing a mask.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you're one of those hysterical mask fanatics who is still wearing one
>>>>> because you're terrified of the Wuhan Flu and you think-- against all
>>>>> evidence-- that a mask somehow protects you, the stores direct you to
>>>>> their online mail order presence and some will allow you to set up an
>>>>> appointment to shop after hours, but during business hours, you're out
>>>>> of luck.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course the same people who shouted down the anti-maskers during the
>>>>> pandemic that "private businesses can enforce whatever dress code they
>>>>> want", are now having screeching meltdowns about how this is a violation
>>>>> of their rights.
>
>>>> BTW you are going to have people wearing a mask this time of year in an
>>>> attempt to avoid catching the flu.
>>>
>>> Then they're going to have to shop online at an increasing number of
>>> stores here.
>>
>> The prohibition will last until people complain and the stores start
>> losing money.
>
> People are already complaining--

Same old shitposting. How many people? Did you talk to them yourself?
Have their been polls? Do you have proof of these polls? No, no, no,
and no.

about their 'rights'-- the same people
> who said rights don't matter when the masks were required. And yet the
> bans persist and grow.

Like crabs.

> And the stores lose a helluva lot more money

How much money? Where are the statistics? Same old shiposting.

from the rampant
> shoplifting than they do from the few customers who still are obsessed
> with wearing masks.

What threshold has to be reached for it to be declared "rampant"? Same
old shitposting.

On Oct 3, 2022 at 2:04:33 PM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

> On 10/3/2022 8:04 AM, A Friend wrote:
>> In article <thea36$14cd$1@gioia.aioe.org>, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/2/2022 6:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
>>>> this:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>>>>
>>>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore
>>
>> Creating that sign, if it were real, would have cost several hundred
>> dollars. OTOH Kitson, the store in question, has been pulling bizarre
>> shit for a while now.
>>
>> https://www.thecut.com/2021/08/the-red-pilling-of-kitson-fraser-ross.html
>>
> That sign looked phony as fuck. The quality control at right wing
> dickhead HQ isn't too good.

Oh, look! It's also on 'progressive'-friendly CBS News' website, too. I guess
you and "A Friend" have some 'splainin' to do. (Unless, that is, you're going
to double down and claim CBS is also intentionally posting fake news now,
too.)

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kitson-bans-face-masks-after-spike-in-theft/

I had no idea that the Democrat cheerleaders at CBS News are now "right-wing
dickhead HQ".

Good to know. (Although I'm sure that'll suddenly change the moment it becomes
inconvenient for you.)

On 10/3/2022 4:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2022 at 2:04:33 PM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/3/2022 8:04 AM, A Friend wrote:
>>> In article <thea36$14cd$1@gioia.aioe.org>, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/2/2022 6:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
>>>>> this:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
>>>>>
>>>>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore
>>>
>>> Creating that sign, if it were real, would have cost several hundred
>>> dollars. OTOH Kitson, the store in question, has been pulling bizarre
>>> shit for a while now.
>>>
>>> https://www.thecut.com/2021/08/the-red-pilling-of-kitson-fraser-ross.html
>>>
>> That sign looked phony as fuck. The quality control at right wing
>> dickhead HQ isn't too good.
>
> Oh, look! It's also on 'progressive'-friendly CBS News' website, too. I guess
> you and "A Friend" have some 'splainin' to do. (Unless, that is, you're going
> to double down and claim CBS is also intentionally posting fake news now,
> too.)
>
> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kitson-bans-face-masks-after-spike-in-theft/
>
> I had no idea that the Democrat cheerleaders at CBS News are now "right-wing
> dickhead HQ".
>
> Good to know. (Although I'm sure that'll suddenly change the moment it becomes
> inconvenient for you.)

You stupid fucking stupid eunuch'd cunt. That's why I said "looked"
because I didn't give a shit enough about your shitpost to find out if
it was real or not and since you lie in just about every post now there
was a good chance it was. If you're in doubt remember I'm a wordsmith
and you're a stupid shitposting cunt. Hope this helps.

But just so we're clear when you say you're "seeing signs around town"
and post one sign, again, you're usually lying. You're more likely to
see signs saying "stupid cunts not welcome."

In article <6oGcnZyWHY87yab-nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> On Oct 3, 2022 at 2:04:33 PM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
> > On 10/3/2022 8:04 AM, A Friend wrote:
> >> In article <thea36$14cd$1@gioia.aioe.org>, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 10/2/2022 6:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>> How times have changed. More and more around town I'm seeing signs like
> >>>> this:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/at0tt9po8f15459/Kitsons.png?dl=0
> >>>>
> >>>> Not only do L.A. stores not require masks anymore
> >>
> >> Creating that sign, if it were real, would have cost several hundred
> >> dollars. OTOH Kitson, the store in question, has been pulling bizarre
> >> shit for a while now.
> >>
> >> https://www.thecut.com/2021/08/the-red-pilling-of-kitson-fraser-ross.html
> >>
> > That sign looked phony as fuck. The quality control at right wing
> > dickhead HQ isn't too good.
>
> Oh, look! It's also on 'progressive'-friendly CBS News' website, too. I guess
> you and "A Friend" have some 'splainin' to do. (Unless, that is, you're going
> to double down and claim CBS is also intentionally posting fake news now,
> too.)

"Intentionally posting fake news" is not a charge I'm going to make.
They're being stupid about it, as the pic doesn't pass the smell test.
I would have called the store to find out what was going on first.

> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kitson-bans-face-masks-after-spike-in-theft/

In article <thfl7u$6fg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:

> If you're in doubt remember I'm a wordsmith

Hahahahahaha! Now *that's* funny, Hutt.

Calling you a wordsmith is like calling one of the slovenly Kardashian
whores a particle physicist.

On 10/3/2022 7:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <thfl7u$6fg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
> wrote:
>
>> If you're in doubt remember I'm a wordsmith
>
> Hahahahahaha! Now *that's* funny, Hutt.

Funny? You're the stupid piece of shit who literally thinks it's
possible to literally know what literally driving off a cliff is like.
That's some stupid fucking shit right there. And of course, being a
eunuch, you don't have the fucking balls to own up to your own bullshit.

> Calling you a wordsmith is like calling one of the slovenly Kardashian
> whores a particle physicist.

]
Ouch. I'm decimated. And still not a misogynist. Let's look at the
tally: Eunuch Derp--eunuch, check. Misogynist, check. Too stupid to
use words correctly, check. White supremacist, check. Too eunuchy to
have a valid identity, check. Did I miss any?

In article <thfl7u$6fg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, gmsingh@email.com wrote:

> If you're in doubt remember I'm a wordsmith

No, that was your sockuppet, FPP, who made that claim.
Do try to not confuse them, mkay?

--
Let's go Brandon!