Critical Cupcake 🌈 ♿ ⚛️
@CriticalCupcake
🤬🤬🤬

"A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."

https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/

On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

>Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>@CriticalCupcake
>???
>
>"A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>
>https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/

This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
bandwagon.

NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>> @CriticalCupcake
>> ???
>>
>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>
>> https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>
> This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
> reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
> bandwagon.
>

Extremely lazy reporting. The “new“ abortion law is from 1864. The refusal
was a 24 hour hold which is standard with any new medication at Walgreens.
I get it on my ongoing prescriptions almost every time. It’s just a “check
to make sure with the doctor and/or insurance” deal. Usually shows up as
“pharmacist is reviewing prescription.” This flap was made by the girls
Doctor Who went to Twitter and quite frankly out an out lied about what was
happening.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 06:32:35 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>>Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>>@CriticalCupcake
>>???
>>
>>"A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>>prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>>Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>
>>https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>
>This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
>reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
>denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>bandwagon.

I agree - the story seems suspicious - normally in such a story the
child's disease would have been named to pull the emotional
heartstrings. Possibly with information on a GoFundMe or other good
cause of that sort.

WASHINGTON - Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said Sunday that he wants any
Hurricane Ian relief bills to be targeted only at disaster funding, adding he
would not vote for legislation that goes beyond that.

Parts of Florida's Gulf Coast were destroyed by the hurricane before it cut
across the state and then swung through the Atlantic and made landfall on the
South Carolina coast. Fifty-four people have died as a result of the storm.

"What I won't support is things that are not emergency relief. What we're
going to ask for Florida is what we supported for every other state in the
country that's been affected by - by natural disasters, and that is emergency
relief designed to be spent immediately to help the people affected now,"
Rubio said on ABC's "This Week."

Rubio voted against Superstorm Sandy relief in 2013, saying that he thought
some funding in the bill was irrelevant to the relief.

He said on CNN's "State of the Union," Sunday that he would vote no on any
bill that is not "clean" when host Dana Bash asked Rubio if he would vote
against a bill ''that smells like pork."

"You will have people in the Senate, in the House that are going to vote
against disaster relief because they view these disaster relief bills as ways
for other people to get their pork and their pet projects done."

"Pork" is slang for unrelated funding requests inserted into congressional
spending legislation.

Hurricane Ian updates: Ian death toll climbs to 54; almost 1 million still
without power in Florida: Live updates

Biden Hurricane Ian: After FEMA update, Biden says Ian could be 'deadliest
hurricane in Florida's history.'

The White House has declared 13 counties in Florida as major disaster areas,
meaning tens of thousands of residents impacted by Hurricane Ian can apply
for financial assistance.

The declaration authorizes the Federal Emergency Management Agency to help
people in affected counties pay for temporary housing and home repairs, offer
low-interest loans to cover uninsured property losses, and fund other federal
programs to assist individuals and business owners recover from one of the
nation's most significant storms.

--
Let's go Brandon!

anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>> This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
>> reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>> bandwagon.
>
> Extremely lazy reporting. The “new“ abortion law is from 1864. The
> refusal was a 24 hour hold which is standard with any new medication at
> Walgreens. I get it on my ongoing prescriptions almost every time. It's
> just a "check to make sure with the doctor and/or insurance"� deal. Usually
> shows up as �pharmacist is reviewing prescription.” This flap was made by
> the girls Doctor Who went to Twitter and quite frankly out an out lied
> about what was happening.

Did he examine her in the TARDIS?

--
Let's go Brandon!

lcraver@home.ca wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 06:32:35 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>>This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
>>reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
>>denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>>bandwagon.
>
>I agree - the story seems suspicious - normally in such a story the
>child's disease would have been named to pull the emotional
>heartstrings. Possibly with information on a GoFundMe or other good
>cause of that sort.

Remember the fake news story about the girl in Ohio having to get an abortion
in another state?

Of COURSE it's more #FakeNews !

--
Let's go Brandon!

Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> WASHINGTON - Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said Sunday that he wants any
> Hurricane Ian relief bills to be targeted only at disaster funding, adding he
> would not vote for legislation that goes beyond that.

Everyone needs emergency relief from Ian!

>
> --
> Let's go Brandon!
>
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On 10/3/2022 12:24 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>>> @CriticalCupcake
>>> ???
>>>
>>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>>
>>> https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>>
>> This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
>> reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>> bandwagon.
>>
>
> Extremely lazy reporting. The “new“ abortion law is from 1864. The refusal
> was a 24 hour hold which is standard with any new medication at Walgreens.

You stupid gay homosexual stupid motherfucker.

"But methotrexate can also be used to end ectopic pregnancies, to induce
an abortion and that’s where the problem arises."

Are all the "medications at Walgreen's used to treat ectopic
pregnancies? Do you know about this stuff firsthand after flying to
Sweden to have a uterus installed? You stupid fuck. You fucking
dipshit find it a literal impossibility to be factual even though Eunuch
Derp is literally able to drive off a fucking cliff.

> I get it on my ongoing prescriptions almost every time.

No shit? You really did have a uterus put in?

It’s just a “check
> to make sure with the doctor and/or insurance” deal. Usually shows up as
> “pharmacist is reviewing prescription.” This flap was made by the girls
> Doctor Who went to Twitter and quite frankly out an out lied about what was
> happening.

Eunuch Derp! Super gay Anim8r managed to egest an even bigger pile of
horseshit than you! What are you going to do about it you weenie?

On 10/3/2022 12:50 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 06:32:35 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>>> @CriticalCupcake
>>> ???
>>>
>>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>>
>>> https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>>
>> This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
>> reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>> bandwagon.
>
> I agree - the story seems suspicious - normally in such a story the
> child's disease would have been named to pull the emotional
> heartstrings. Possibly with information on a GoFundMe or other good
> cause of that sort.

And a new candidate for stupidest motherfucker on the group emerges.

On 10/3/2022 1:28 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> lcraver@home.ca wrote:
>> On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 06:32:35 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>> This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
>>> reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
>>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>>> bandwagon.
>>
>> I agree - the story seems suspicious - normally in such a story the
>> child's disease would have been named to pull the emotional
>> heartstrings. Possibly with information on a GoFundMe or other good
>> cause of that sort.
>
> Remember the fake news story about the girl in Ohio having to get an abortion
> in another state?
>
> Of COURSE it's more #FakeNews !

And here is Ubi Pubie, king of shitposting!

anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

>> WASHINGTON - Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said Sunday that he wants any
>> Hurricane Ian relief bills to be targeted only at disaster funding,
>> adding he would not vote for legislation that goes beyond that.
>
> Everyone needs emergency relief from Ian!

Well, that's just mean!

--
Let's go Brandon!

On 2022-10-03 12:28 p.m., Ubiquitous wrote:
> lcraver@home.ca wrote:
>> On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 06:32:35 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>> This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
>>> reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
>>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>>> bandwagon.
>>
>> I agree - the story seems suspicious - normally in such a story the
>> child's disease would have been named to pull the emotional
>> heartstrings. Possibly with information on a GoFundMe or other good
>> cause of that sort.
>
> Remember the fake news story about the girl in Ohio having to get an abortion
> in another state?

Right. The story that the Republicans pronounced fake. After which
Gerson Fuentes, the father of the foetus was charged with rape, with the
police investigator who had been questioning him testifying at the
preliminary healing that Fuentes had confessed to raping her on at least
two occasions. And then the Indiana AG said he was investigating
Caitlin Bernard, the doctor who performed the abortion in that state to
see whether she'd reported the abortion to the authorities, and for
whether she had violated patient privacy laws. Then there was the Ohio
AG who said the abortion would have been legal under Ohio law. This was
not in fact true.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/07/28/gerson-fuentes-rape-charge-held-without-bond/10174498002/

On 10/7/2022 3:06 AM, David Johnston wrote:
> On 2022-10-03 12:28 p.m., Ubiquitous wrote:
>> lcraver@home.ca wrote:
>>> On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 06:32:35 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> This sounds like lazy reporting.  There is much given in the way of
>>>> reason why this may have been done.  It is just as likely she was
>>>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>>>> bandwagon.
>>>
>>> I agree - the story seems suspicious - normally in such a story the
>>> child's disease would have been named to pull the emotional
>>> heartstrings. Possibly with information on a GoFundMe or other good
>>> cause of that sort.
>>
>> Remember the fake news story about the girl in Ohio having to get an
>> abortion
>> in another state?
>
> Right.  The story that the Republicans pronounced fake.  After which
> Gerson Fuentes, the father of the foetus was charged with rape, with the
> police investigator who had been questioning him testifying at the
> preliminary healing that Fuentes had confessed to raping her on at least
> two occasions.  And then the Indiana AG said he was investigating
> Caitlin Bernard, the doctor who performed the abortion in that state to
> see whether she'd reported the abortion to the authorities, and for
> whether she had violated patient privacy laws.  Then there was the Ohio
> AG who said the abortion would have been legal under Ohio law.  This was
> not in fact true.
>
> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/07/28/gerson-fuentes-rape-charge-held-without-bond/10174498002/
>

Holy balls, Pubie lied again? That's the fourth time this minute!

David Johnston <davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On 2022-10-03 12:28 p.m., Ubiquitous wrote:

>>>. . .

>>Remember the fake news story about the girl in Ohio having to get an abortion
>>in another state?

>Right. The story that the Republicans pronounced fake. After which
>Gerson Fuentes, the father of the foetus was charged with rape, with the
>police investigator who had been questioning him testifying at the
>preliminary healing that Fuentes had confessed to raping her on at least
>two occasions. And then the Indiana AG said he was investigating
>Caitlin Bernard, the doctor who performed the abortion in that state to
>see whether she'd reported the abortion to the authorities, and for
>whether she had violated patient privacy laws. Then there was the Ohio
>AG who said the abortion would have been legal under Ohio law. This was
>not in fact true.

>https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/07/28/gerson-fuentes-rape-charge-held-without-bond/10174498002/

Hold it.

It sounded fake because the reporter who first interviewed the doctor
reported the abortion in an off-hand way and failed to confirm the facts
of the salacious story independently. Then Biden used it in a speech.

It was only after a reporter from a Gannet paper in the state that the
girl came from dug through police reports and was able to identify the
crime and the victim that it turned out to be a true story.

Biden never should have used the unconfirmed story in a speech and,
quite frankly, he lucked out.

So yeah, it was badly reported but it turned out NOT to be fake news.
The unconfirmed story never should have run and it was unprofessional
journalism but not for the reason Ubi believes.

The Indiana AG libeled the doctor and said he was conducting a criminal
investigation because she had a history of failing to comply with
Indiana's medical reporting requirements.

That turned out not to be true in any way. Her record keeping and
reporting were quite complete.

Didn't she sue him for libel?

On 2022-10-07 12:29 p.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> David Johnston <davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 2022-10-03 12:28 p.m., Ubiquitous wrote:
>
>>>> . . .
>
>>> Remember the fake news story about the girl in Ohio having to get an abortion
>>> in another state?
>
>> Right. The story that the Republicans pronounced fake. After which
>> Gerson Fuentes, the father of the foetus was charged with rape, with the
>> police investigator who had been questioning him testifying at the
>> preliminary healing that Fuentes had confessed to raping her on at least
>> two occasions. And then the Indiana AG said he was investigating
>> Caitlin Bernard, the doctor who performed the abortion in that state to
>> see whether she'd reported the abortion to the authorities, and for
>> whether she had violated patient privacy laws. Then there was the Ohio
>> AG who said the abortion would have been legal under Ohio law. This was
>> not in fact true.
>
>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/07/28/gerson-fuentes-rape-charge-held-without-bond/10174498002/
>
> Hold it.
>
> It sounded fake because the reporter who first interviewed the doctor
> reported the abortion in an off-hand way and failed to confirm the facts
> of the salacious story independently. Then Biden used it in a speech.
>
> It was only after a reporter from a Gannet paper in the state that the
> girl came from dug through police reports and was able to identify the
> crime and the victim that it turned out to be a true story.
>
> Biden never should have used the unconfirmed story in a speech and,
> quite frankly, he lucked out.
>
> So yeah, it was badly reported but it turned out NOT to be fake news.
> The unconfirmed story never should have run and it was unprofessional
> journalism but not for the reason Ubi believes.
>
> The Indiana AG libeled the doctor and said he was conducting a criminal
> investigation because she had a history of failing to comply with
> Indiana's medical reporting requirements.
>
> That turned out not to be true in any way. Her record keeping and
> reporting were quite complete.
>
> Didn't she sue him for libel?

Her attorney took the first step that could lead to a libel lawsuit, but
it seems to just have been a warning that if Rokita didn't stop the
harassment he'd face legal action. I'm guessing he did stop.

David Johnston <davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On 2022-10-07 12:29 p.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>David Johnston <davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>On 2022-10-03 12:28 p.m., Ubiquitous wrote:

>>>>>. . .

>>>>Remember the fake news story about the girl in Ohio having to get an
>>>>abortion in another state?

>>>Right. The story that the Republicans pronounced fake. After which
>>>Gerson Fuentes, the father of the foetus was charged with rape, with the
>>>police investigator who had been questioning him testifying at the
>>>preliminary healing that Fuentes had confessed to raping her on at least
>>>two occasions. And then the Indiana AG said he was investigating
>>>Caitlin Bernard, the doctor who performed the abortion in that state to
>>>see whether she'd reported the abortion to the authorities, and for
>>>whether she had violated patient privacy laws. Then there was the Ohio
>>>AG who said the abortion would have been legal under Ohio law. This was
>>>not in fact true.

>>>https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/07/28/gerson-fuentes-rape-charge-held-without-bond/10174498002/

>>Hold it.

>>It sounded fake because the reporter who first interviewed the doctor
>>reported the abortion in an off-hand way and failed to confirm the facts
>>of the salacious story independently. Then Biden used it in a speech.

>>It was only after a reporter from a Gannet paper in the state that the
>>girl came from dug through police reports and was able to identify the
>>crime and the victim that it turned out to be a true story.

>>Biden never should have used the unconfirmed story in a speech and,
>>quite frankly, he lucked out.

>>So yeah, it was badly reported but it turned out NOT to be fake news.
>>The unconfirmed story never should have run and it was unprofessional
>>journalism but not for the reason Ubi believes.

>>The Indiana AG libeled the doctor and said he was conducting a criminal
>>investigation because she had a history of failing to comply with
>>Indiana's medical reporting requirements.

>>That turned out not to be true in any way. Her record keeping and
>>reporting were quite complete.

>>Didn't she sue him for libel?

>Her attorney took the first step that could lead to a libel lawsuit, but
>it seems to just have been a warning that if Rokita didn't stop the
>harassment he'd face legal action. I'm guessing he did stop.

Thanks. I wondered what became of the lawsuit. It would have been
interesting if she'd pursued it.

In <thq64q$3s4r0$1@dont-email.me> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> writes:

[snip]

>>>Didn't she sue him for libel?

>>Her attorney took the first step that could lead to a libel lawsuit, but
>>it seems to just have been a warning that if Rokita didn't stop the
>>harassment he'd face legal action. I'm guessing he did stop.

>Thanks. I wondered what became of the lawsuit. It would have been
>interesting if she'd pursued it.

Probably not. Bringing _any_ gov't agency/head to
accountability in courtrooms is just about impossible.

For folk like DAs and AGs, change that "just about"
to "99.999%" ...

--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

On 10/7/2022 5:47 PM, RichA wrote:
> On Monday, 3 October 2022 at 06:18:52 UTC-4, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Critical Cupcake 🌈 ♿ ⚛️
>> @CriticalCupcake
>> 🤬🤬🤬
>>
>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>
>> https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>
> Nothing like fishing for one-offs, huh?

Normal people use the word "phishing" these days, but hey, you haven't
managed to look as stupid as right wing darling Herschel Walker yet!

BTW, what's with the f------ emojies?

Apparently they can be copied from Twitter, why do you even give a shit?

On 2022-10-03 11:24 a.m., anim8rfsk wrote:
> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>>> @CriticalCupcake
>>> ???
>>>
>>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>>
>>> https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>>
>> This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
>> reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>> bandwagon.
>>
>
> Extremely lazy reporting. The “new“ abortion law is from 1864. The refusal
> was a 24 hour hold which is standard with any new medication at Walgreens.

How do you know it was a 24 hour hold?

On 2022-10-03 4:32 a.m., NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>> @CriticalCupcake
>> ???
>>
>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>
>> https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>
> This sounds like lazy reporting. There is much given in the way of
> reason why this may have been done. It is just as likely she was
> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
> bandwagon.

Why is it just as likely she was denied for a different reason?

On 10/7/2022 6:31 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> On 2022-10-03 4:32 a.m., NoBody wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>>> @CriticalCupcake
>>> ???
>>>
>>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>>
>>> https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>>>
>>
>> This sounds like lazy reporting.  There is much given in the way of
>> reason why this may have been done.  It is just as likely she was
>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>> bandwagon.
>
> Why is it just as likely she was denied for a different reason?

The medication is for Rheumatoid Arthritis, but can also be used for
abortions. Pharmacists are prohibited from filling prescriptions for it.

On 2022-10-07 11:07 p.m., suzeeq wrote:
> On 10/7/2022 6:31 PM, David Johnston wrote:
>> On 2022-10-03 4:32 a.m., NoBody wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>>>> @CriticalCupcake
>>>> ???
>>>>
>>>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>>>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>>>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>>>
>>>> https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>>>
>>> This sounds like lazy reporting.  There is much given in the way of
>>> reason why this may have been done.  It is just as likely she was
>>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>>> bandwagon.
>>
>> Why is it just as likely she was denied for a different reason?
>
> The medication is for Rheumatoid Arthritis, but can also be used for
> abortions. Pharmacists are prohibited from filling prescriptions for it.

It would be more accurate to say that they're afraid to fill
prescriptions for it because they're afraid the transaction will be
misinterpreted.

On 10/8/2022 12:07 AM, suzeeq wrote:
> On 10/7/2022 6:31 PM, David Johnston wrote:
>> On 2022-10-03 4:32 a.m., NoBody wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:18:47 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Critical Cupcake ? ? ??
>>>> @CriticalCupcake
>>>> ???
>>>>
>>>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>>>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>>>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>>>>
>>>> https://www.kold.com/2022/10/01/teen-girl-denied-medication-refill-under-azs-new-abortion-law/
>>>
>>> This sounds like lazy reporting.  There is much given in the way of
>>> reason why this may have been done.  It is just as likely she was
>>> denied for a different reason and the left is jumping on the abortion
>>> bandwagon.
>>
>> Why is it just as likely she was denied for a different reason?
>
> The medication is for Rheumatoid Arthritis, but can also be used for
> abortions. Pharmacists are prohibited from filling prescriptions for it.

They aren't "prohibited" they just don't want to risk being prosecuted
for it.

rander3128@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 3 October 2022 at 06:18:52 UTC-4, gmsingh@email.com wrote:

>> Critical Cupcake 🌈 ♿ ⚛️
>> @CriticalCupcake
>> 🤬🤬🤬
>>
>> "A 14-year-old Tucson girl was denied a refill of a life-saving
>> prescription drug she had been taking for years just two days after
>> Arizona’s new abortion law had taken effect."
>
> Nothing like fishing for one-offs, huh?

Yeah, you can practically smell the desperation from "trotsky".
Sad.

--
Let's go Brandon!