On 9/12/2022 10:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <tfoq6b$18mv$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <tfm7rn$9q7$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-09-10 11:17 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 5:23 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> "Certain spots". Media soft-pedal for "they were banned from camping in
>>>>>>> front of schools and other places frequented by children". Because
>>>>>>> refusing to allow vagrant encampments in and around schools, forcing
>>>>>>> the kids to have to play Turd Hopscotch and Needle Roulette on their
>>>>>>> way into and out of school everyday, having to run a gauntlet of sex
>>>>>>> offenders and violent ex-cons is just *such* an extreme position to
>>>>>>> take.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What a load of bigoted stereotyping.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are all you leftists suddenly so invested in exposing children to
>>>>> every manner of human degradation?
>>>>
>>>> We're not.
>>>
>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>> Where is the degradation there?
>>
>> [Snip unsanitary conditions at encampments -- this is what happens if
>> you deny a swath of the population access to the tools of basic hygiene,
>> dummkopf.
>
> Just like when the city provided dumpsters for their trash and the
> vagrants ignored them

That's just mean. It's not like anyone else in a big city litters, right?

On 2022-09-12 11:40 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 2022-09-10 11:17 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> Why are all you leftists suddenly so invested in exposing children to
>>>>> every manner of human degradation?
>>>>
>>>> We're not.
>>>
>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>> Where is the degradation there?

*crickets*

>> [Snip unsanitary conditions at encampments -- this is what happens if
>> you deny a swath of the population access to the tools of basic hygiene,
>> dummkopf.
>
> Just like when the city provided dumpsters for their trash and the
> vagrants ignored them and continued to throw their trash on the ground,
> when the city provided the vagrants with "tools of basic hygiene", they
> still shit on the sidewalk.

[citation needed]

> L.A. put portable toilets and washrooms all around the encampments

Free to use, or with coin-operated doors or something like that?

> Human sex trafficking is just one more crime that goes unenforced and
> tolerated (and thereby encouraged) by our entirely 'progressive'
> Democrat city government.

[citation needed]

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

On Sep 13, 2022 at 7:56:28 PM PDT, "kensi"
<kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> On 2022-09-12 11:40 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-09-10 11:17 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> Why are all you leftists suddenly so invested in exposing children to
>>>>>> every manner of human degradation?
>>>>>
>>>>> We're not.
>>>>
>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>>
>>> Where is the degradation there?
>
> *crickets*
>
>>> [Snip unsanitary conditions at encampments -- this is what happens if
>>> you deny a swath of the population access to the tools of basic hygiene,
>>> dummkopf.
>>
>> Just like when the city provided dumpsters for their trash and the
>> vagrants ignored them and continued to throw their trash on the ground,
>> when the city provided the vagrants with "tools of basic hygiene", they
>> still shit on the sidewalk.
>
> [citation needed]

The trash mountains in Venice right out in the open for all to see are all the
"citation" necessary.
>
>> L.A. put portable toilets and washrooms all around the encampments
>
> Free to use, or with coin-operated doors or something like that?

Free. The vagrants get everything free (which isn't really free-- they've just
changed the address on the bill).

On 9/13/2022 11:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2022 at 7:56:28 PM PDT, "kensi"
> <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2022-09-12 11:40 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 11:17 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> Why are all you leftists suddenly so invested in exposing children to
>>>>>>> every manner of human degradation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We're not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>>>
>>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>
>> *crickets*
>>
>>>> [Snip unsanitary conditions at encampments -- this is what happens if
>>>> you deny a swath of the population access to the tools of basic hygiene,
>>>> dummkopf.
>>>
>>> Just like when the city provided dumpsters for their trash and the
>>> vagrants ignored them and continued to throw their trash on the ground,
>>> when the city provided the vagrants with "tools of basic hygiene", they
>>> still shit on the sidewalk.
>>
>> [citation needed]
>
> The trash mountains in Venice right out in the open for all to see are all the
> "citation" necessary.

No verb necessary either apparently.

>>> L.A. put portable toilets and washrooms all around the encampments
>>
>> Free to use, or with coin-operated doors or something like that?
>
> Free. The vagrants get everything free (which isn't really free-- they've just
> changed the address on the bill).

Nobody's stopping you from joining them, if you haven't already.

On 2022-09-14 12:55 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2022 at 7:56:28 PM PDT, "kensi"
>> On 2022-09-12 11:40 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 11:17 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> every manner of human degradation?
>>>>>> We're not.
>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>> Where is the degradation there?
>> *crickets*

*crickets intensifying*

>>> when the city provided the vagrants with "tools of basic hygiene", they
>>> still shit on the sidewalk.
>>
>> [citation needed]
>
> The trash mountains in Venice right out in the open for all to see are all the
> "citation" necessary.

Disagree. All I have so far is your word for it, and I'm certainly not
flying all the way from Helsinki to LA (roughly halfway around the
entire planet) just to eyeball this location for myself. Not unless
you'll be paying me the full cost of the trip, including airfare,
accommodations, and my salary for the duration.

>>> L.A. put portable toilets and washrooms all around the encampments
>>
>> Free to use, or with coin-operated doors or something like that?
>
> Free. The vagrants get everything free (which isn't really free-- they've just
> changed the address on the bill).

Everything except what they actually need: housing.

Capitalism has failed them, and most of us, and the planet. It's time
for it to die so that something new can be tried.

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

In article <tg0qkm$58k$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> On 2022-09-14 12:55 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> > On Sep 13, 2022 at 7:56:28 PM PDT, "kensi"
> >> On 2022-09-12 11:40 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2022-09-10 11:17 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> every manner of human degradation?
> >>>>>> We're not.
> >>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
> >>>> Where is the degradation there?
> >> *crickets*
>
> *crickets intensifying*
>
> >>> when the city provided the vagrants with "tools of basic hygiene", they
> >>> still shit on the sidewalk.
> >>
> >> [citation needed]
> >
> > The trash mountains in Venice right out in the open for all to see are
> > all the "citation" necessary.
>
> Disagree. All I have so far is your word for it, and I'm certainly not
> flying all the way from Helsinki to LA (roughly halfway around the
> entire planet) just to eyeball this location for myself.

Do what you want. Fly here, Google some images, there are a lot of 24/7
webcams of Venice on YouTube, etc. Ultimately what you choose to do or
not do is of no concern to me.

> >>> L.A. put portable toilets and washrooms all around the encampments
> >>
> >> Free to use, or with coin-operated doors or something like that?
> >
> > Free. The vagrants get everything free (which isn't really free--
> > they've just changed the address on the bill).
>
> Everything except what they actually need: housing.

Giving a violent schizophrenic or a chronically addicted drug addict or
alcoholic an apartment does nothing to solve the problem. They're still
going to be a burden and a danger to those around them and will do
nothing but trash and foul the taxpayer-funded dwelling they've been
provided for free.

This isn't theoretical, either. During the Wuhan Flu lockdowns, vagrants
in San Francisco and L.A. were provided free hotel rooms via "Project
Room Key". A year and a half later, when the project was ended, the
cities (read: taxpayers) were on the hook for the repair and renovation
of hundreds of hotel rooms which were trashed by the vagrants that were
living in them. Everything from feces smeared on the walls, to
infestations of rodents and insects attracted by rotting food tossed on
the floors and left to rot, to rooms being partially incinerated by
vagrants trying to cook meth in them.

In several instances, the damage was so extensive that the city was
forced to buy the entire property outright and demolish the hotel
because the damage was too extensive and was condemned as unacceptable
for human habitation by code enforcement.

> Capitalism has failed them, and most of us, and the planet. It's time
> for it to die so that something new can be tried.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/vtxx07bzesokwr0/Capitalism_Failed.png?dl=0

On 2022-09-16 12:18 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2022-09-14 12:55 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Sep 13, 2022 at 7:56:28 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>>> On 2022-09-12 11:40 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>>> *crickets*
>>
>> *crickets intensifying*

*crickets now voting on whether to unionize, complaining of overwork*

>> Disagree. All I have so far is your word for it, and I'm certainly not
>> flying all the way from Helsinki to LA (roughly halfway around the
>> entire planet) just to eyeball this location for myself.
>
> Do what you want. Fly here, Google some images, there are a lot of 24/7
> webcams of Venice on YouTube, etc. Ultimately what you choose to do or
> not do is of no concern to me.

Then I *choose* to remain skeptical of your klame for so long as you
choose not to substantiate it when challenged to do so.

>>> Free. The vagrants get everything free (which isn't really free--
>>> they've just changed the address on the bill).
>>
>> Everything except what they actually need: housing.
>
> Giving a [stereotype deleted] or a [stereotype deleted] or [stereotype
> deleted] an apartment does nothing to solve the problem.

It does everything to solve the problems that are the direct result of
having a large unhoused population. It does not, admittedly, solve the
problems your (mostly bogus anyway) stereotypes reference, but the
funding to address those problems was long since cut along with the
funding for adequate public housing, and for the same greedy capitalist
reasons.

> They're still going to be a burden

Capitalism strikes again: anyone who isn't a billionaire is valued only
insofar as they are of some use to a billionaire. We're all objects, as
far as the ruling class is concerned, with no independent right to
exist, and by extension no freedom. The "free" market makes serfs of
everyone but the wealthiest, to be bought, sold, used, and discarded as
those barons see fit. Feudalism was not really overthrown in 1776, just
disguised. Rather badly disguised, at that.

In an actually humanist society, *nobody* would be viewed as a "burden".
People would be seen as ends in themselves, not means to an end nor
obstacles.

> This isn't theoretical, either. During the Wuhan Flu lockdowns, vagrants
> in San Francisco and L.A. were provided free hotel rooms via "Project
> Room Key". A year and a half later, when the project was ended, the
> cities (read: taxpayers) were on the hook for the repair and renovation
> of hundreds of hotel rooms which were trashed by the vagrants that were
> living in them. Everything from feces smeared on the walls, to
> infestations of rodents and insects attracted by rotting food tossed on
> the floors and left to rot, to rooms being partially incinerated by
> vagrants trying to cook meth in them.

[citation needed]

> In several instances, the damage was so extensive that the city was
> forced to buy the entire property outright and demolish the hotel
> because the damage was too extensive and was condemned as unacceptable
> for human habitation by code enforcement.

[citation needed]

>> Capitalism has failed them, and most of us, and the planet. It's time
>> for it to die so that something new can be tried.
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/vtxx07bzesokwr0/Capitalism_Failed.png?dl=0

Not even going to bother clicking on another of your blank dropbox
"png file"s. But I will provide you with some food for thought:

https://evonomics.com/free-market-genocide-the-real-history-of-trade/

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

In article <tg15ar$11u4$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> On 2022-09-16 12:18 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> > kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> On 2022-09-14 12:55 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> On Sep 13, 2022 at 7:56:28 PM PDT, "kensi"
> >>>> On 2022-09-12 11:40 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
> >>>>>> Where is the degradation there?
> >>>> *crickets*
> >>
> >> *crickets intensifying*
>
> *crickets now voting on whether to unionize, complaining of overwork*
>
> >> Disagree. All I have so far is your word for it, and I'm certainly not
> >> flying all the way from Helsinki to LA (roughly halfway around the
> >> entire planet) just to eyeball this location for myself.
> >
> > Do what you want. Fly here, Google some images, there are a lot of 24/7
> > webcams of Venice on YouTube, etc. Ultimately what you choose to do or
> > not do is of no concern to me.
>
> Then I *choose* to remain skeptical of your klame

Somehow I think I'll manage to survive.

[Rest snipped as hypocritical demands for citations while providing none
to back up the kensi/seamus sock's own assertions.]

On 2022-09-16 4:01 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> [snip his complete capitulation on every point via not making any
> effort at all to defend any of his klames]
*does a little victory dance*

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
<kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <tfm7rn$9q7$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2022-09-10 11:17 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-09-10 5:23 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>
>>>>>> "Certain spots". Media soft-pedal for "they were banned from camping in
>>>>>> front of schools and other places frequented by children". Because
>>>>>> refusing to allow vagrant encampments in and around schools, forcing
>>>>>> the kids to have to play Turd Hopscotch and Needle Roulette on their
>>>>>> way into and out of school everyday, having to run a gauntlet of sex
>>>>>> offenders and violent ex-cons is just *such* an extreme position to
>>>>>> take.
>>>>>
>>>>> What a load of bigoted stereotyping.
>>>>
>>>> Why are all you leftists suddenly so invested in exposing children to
>>>> every manner of human degradation?
>>>
>>> We're not.
>>
>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>
> Where is the degradation there?

A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a kid in
the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1573048386076319744/pu/vid/720x1160/qNZJp6WtUVtTPCv5.mp4?tag=14

On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>> Where is the degradation there?
>
> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a kid in
> the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.

Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

On Sep 22, 2022 at 8:13:26 PM PDT, "kensi"
<kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>
>> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a kid in
>> the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>
> Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
> nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
> degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
> was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
> that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
> accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?

The kensi sock does all it can to keep from having to answer the original
question: Why are leftists so invested lately in exposing children to this
sort of thing and to violent, drug-addicted vagrants?

On 9/22/2022 6:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
> <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <tfm7rn$9q7$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-09-10 11:17 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 5:23 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> "Certain spots". Media soft-pedal for "they were banned from camping in
>>>>>>> front of schools and other places frequented by children". Because
>>>>>>> refusing to allow vagrant encampments in and around schools, forcing
>>>>>>> the kids to have to play Turd Hopscotch and Needle Roulette on their
>>>>>>> way into and out of school everyday, having to run a gauntlet of sex
>>>>>>> offenders and violent ex-cons is just *such* an extreme position to
>>>>>>> take.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What a load of bigoted stereotyping.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are all you leftists suddenly so invested in exposing children to
>>>>> every manner of human degradation?
>>>>
>>>> We're not.
>>>
>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>
>> Where is the degradation there?
>
> A trans-testicle stripper

Irony alert courtesy of Eunuch Derp!

performs at an “all ages” drag show while a kid in
> the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>
>
> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1573048386076319744/pu/vid/720x1160/qNZJp6WtUVtTPCv5.mp4?tag=14
>
>

On 9/22/2022 11:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2022 at 8:13:26 PM PDT, "kensi"
> <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>>
>>> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a kid in
>>> the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>>
>> Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
>> nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
>> degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
>> was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
>> that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
>> accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?
>
> The kensi sock does all it can to keep from having to answer the original
> question: Why are leftists so invested lately in exposing children to this
> sort of thing and to violent, drug-addicted vagrants?
>
>

More horseshit.

kkensington01@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:

>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>
>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>
>> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while
>> a kid in the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>
>Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
>nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
>degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
>was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
>that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
>accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?

Nonresponse noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

--
Let's go Brandon!

atropos@mac.com wrote:
> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:

>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>>
>>> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while
>>> a kid in the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>>
>> Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
>> nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
>> degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
>> was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
>> that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
>> accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?
>
>The kensi sock does all it can to keep from having to answer the original
>question:

That's its tell for when it has lost a debate.

>Why are leftists so invested lately in exposing children to this
>sort of thing and to violent, drug-addicted vagrants?

One word: grooming.

--
Let's go Brandon!

On 2022-09-22 11:13 p.m., kensi wrote:
> On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>
>> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a
>> kid in
>> the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>
> Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
> nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
> degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
> was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
> that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
> accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?

Let the record show that nobody was willing to be more specific, and
therefore that the claim that it is "degrading" remains unsupported by
any evidence.

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

In article <tgm27t$ih3$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> On 2022-09-22 11:13 p.m., kensi wrote:
> > On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> >> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
> >>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
> >>> Where is the degradation there?
> >>
> >> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a
> >> kid in the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
> >
> > Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
> > nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
> > degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
> > was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
> > that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
> > accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?
>
> Let the record show that nobody was willing to be more specific, and
> therefore that the claim that it is "degrading" remains unsupported by
> any evidence.

Let the record show that the kensi-sock is perfectly fine with and sees
nothing wrong with 7-year-olds watching trans-testicle strip shows and
can't seem to explain why leftist 'progressives' are so invested in
exposing children to this sort of thing.

On 9/24/2022 1:17 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <tgm27t$ih3$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2022-09-22 11:13 p.m., kensi wrote:
>>> On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>>>
>>>> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a
>>>> kid in the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>>>
>>> Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
>>> nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
>>> degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
>>> was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
>>> that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
>>> accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?
>>
>> Let the record show that nobody was willing to be more specific, and
>> therefore that the claim that it is "degrading" remains unsupported by
>> any evidence.
>
> Let the record show that the kensi-sock is perfectly fine with and sees
> nothing wrong with 7-year-olds watching trans-testicle strip shows and
> can't seem to explain why leftist 'progressives' are so invested in
> exposing children to this sort of thing.

`So you're saying you're too scared shitless to answer the question,
Eunuch Derp?

On 2022-09-24 2:17 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <tgm27t$ih3$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2022-09-22 11:13 p.m., kensi wrote:
>>> On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>>>
>>>> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a
>>>> kid in the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>>>
>>> Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
>>> nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
>>> degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
>>> was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
>>> that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
>>> accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?
>>
>> Let the record show that nobody was willing to be more specific, and
>> therefore that the claim that it is "degrading" remains unsupported by
>> any evidence.
>
> Let the record show that the kensi-sock

Who is "the kensi-sock", ko0k? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.

> is perfectly fine with and sees nothing wrong with 7-year-olds watching
> trans-testicle strip shows and can't seem to explain why leftist
> 'progressives' are so invested in exposing children to this sort of
> thing.

[citation needed] that they are holding strip shows (as opposed to, say,
story hours) in any locations with children.

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

On Sep 24, 2022 at 9:06:53 PM PDT, "kensi"
<kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> On 2022-09-24 2:17 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <tgm27t$ih3$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2022-09-22 11:13 p.m., kensi wrote:
>>>> On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>>>>
>>>>> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a
>>>>> kid in the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>>>>
>>>> Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
>>>> nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
>>>> degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
>>>> was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
>>>> that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
>>>> accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?
>>>
>>> Let the record show that nobody was willing to be more specific, and
>>> therefore that the claim that it is "degrading" remains unsupported by
>>> any evidence.
>>
>> Let the record show that the kensi-sock
>
> Who is "the kensi-sock", ko0k? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
> that alias.
>
>> is perfectly fine with and sees nothing wrong with 7-year-olds watching
>> trans-testicle strip shows and can't seem to explain why leftist
>> 'progressives' are so invested in exposing children to this sort of
>> thing.
>
> [citation needed] that they are holding strip shows (as opposed to, say,
> story hours) in any locations with children.

This is what a "family friendly" drag show looks like. Drag queens spreading
their legs for little kids to tip them.

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1581050115535818753/pu/vid/720x1120/VT2xD3s9hPfrw1V9.mp4?tag=14

The kensi sock *still* hasn't explained why it's become so important lately
for 'progressive' leftists to do this sort of thing for young children.

On 10/15/2022 5:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2022 at 9:06:53 PM PDT, "kensi"
> <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2022-09-24 2:17 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <tgm27t$ih3$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>> kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-09-22 11:13 p.m., kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-09-22 7:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2022 at 7:33:48 PM PDT, "kensi"
>>>>>>> On 2022-09-11 11:59 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> Kid-time drag queen shows called. They beg to differ.
>>>>>>> Where is the degradation there?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A trans-testicle stripper performs at an “all ages” drag show while a
>>>>>> kid in the front row attempts to hand the stripper a cash tip.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please be more specific. Where is the degradation? Was there any actual
>>>>> nudity? If so, does that mean you think the human body is inherently
>>>>> degrading, either of itself or of whomever sees it? But I doubt there
>>>>> was nudity, let alone anything outright sexually explicit. So ... was it
>>>>> that the person was gender nonconforming? Or maybe the fact that they
>>>>> accepted tips? Is a server at a restaurant degrading as well, then?
>>>>
>>>> Let the record show that nobody was willing to be more specific, and
>>>> therefore that the claim that it is "degrading" remains unsupported by
>>>> any evidence.
>>>
>>> Let the record show that the kensi-sock
>>
>> Who is "the kensi-sock", ko0k? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
>>
>>> is perfectly fine with and sees nothing wrong with 7-year-olds watching
>>> trans-testicle strip shows and can't seem to explain why leftist
>>> 'progressives' are so invested in exposing children to this sort of
>>> thing.
>>
>> [citation needed] that they are holding strip shows (as opposed to, say,
>> story hours) in any locations with children.
>
> This is what a "family friendly" drag show looks like. Drag queens spreading
> their legs for little kids to tip them.
>
>
> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1581050115535818753/pu/vid/720x1120/VT2xD3s9hPfrw1V9.mp4?tag=14
>
> The kensi sock *still* hasn't explained why it's become so important lately
> for 'progressive' leftists to do this sort of thing for young children.

Maybe the kensi sock is waiting for the "Ed Stasiak" sock to ask him.
But hey, at least you're entertaining.

On 2022-10-15 6:35 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2022 at 9:06:53 PM PDT, "kensi"
> <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> [citation needed] that they are holding strip shows (as opposed to, say,
>> story hours) in any locations with children.
>
> This is what a "family friendly" drag show looks like. Drag queens spreading
> their legs for little kids to tip them.
>
> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1581050115535818753/pu/vid/720x1120/VT2xD3s9hPfrw1V9.mp4?tag=14

I didn't see anything there any more sexual than you could see watching
gymnastics in the Summer Games, and you can find people baring a *lot*
more skin at the local beach. Children are routinely allowed to witness
both.

You're just being ridiculous now.

The only way this thing differed was that the performers are
gender-nonconforming. So clearly it is that which is offending you, and
only that. Which makes you a bigot, but one without the gonads to own it.

Everybody everywhere is going to say that BTR1701 is the biggest yellow
belly in the west!

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

On 11/18/22 9:47 PM, kensi wrote:
> On 2022-10-15 6:35 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Sep 24, 2022 at 9:06:53 PM PDT, "kensi"
>> <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> [citation needed] that they are holding strip shows (as opposed to, say,
>>> story hours) in any locations with children.
>>
>> This is what a "family friendly" drag show looks like. Drag queens
>> spreading
>> their legs for little kids to tip them.
>>
>> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1581050115535818753/pu/vid/720x1120/VT2xD3s9hPfrw1V9.mp4?tag=14
>
> I didn't see anything there any more sexual than you could see watching
> gymnastics in the Summer Games, and you can find people baring a *lot*
> more skin at the local beach. Children are routinely allowed to witness
> both.
>
> You're just being ridiculous now.

Yeah, but is it really his fault that this is the only thing that will
give him an erection?

> The only way this thing differed was that the performers are
> gender-nonconforming. So clearly it is that which is offending you, and
> only that. Which makes you a bigot, but one without the gonads to own it.

100% And his lack of gonads is obviously a running theme.

> Everybody everywhere is going to say that BTR1701 is the biggest yellow
> belly in the west!

I believe eunuch is more apropos, but there it is.

On 2022-11-18 10:47 p.m., kensi wrote:
> On 2022-10-15 6:35 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Sep 24, 2022 at 9:06:53 PM PDT, "kensi"
>> <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> [citation needed] that they are holding strip shows (as opposed to, say,
>>> story hours) in any locations with children.
>>
>> This is what a "family friendly" drag show looks like. Drag queens
>> spreading
>> their legs for little kids to tip them.
>>
>> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1581050115535818753/pu/vid/720x1120/VT2xD3s9hPfrw1V9.mp4?tag=14
>
> I didn't see anything there any more sexual than you could see watching
> gymnastics in the Summer Games, and you can find people baring a *lot*
> more skin at the local beach. Children are routinely allowed to witness
> both.
>
> You're just being ridiculous now.
>
> The only way this thing differed was that the performers are
> gender-nonconforming. So clearly it is that which is offending you, and
> only that. Which makes you a bigot, but one without the gonads to own it.
>
> Everybody everywhere is going to say that BTR1701 is the biggest yellow
> belly in the west!

*crickets*

K0ok's k0wardice k0nfirmed!

*snicker*

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate