BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> In article
> <75033457.692129385.177902.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:11:37 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>
>>>>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>
>>>>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>
>>>>>> They cook everything in peanut oil
>>>
>>>>> This may be an issue for anyone with a peanut allergy, so they
>>>>> should avoid it at all cost. But this doesn't make it a "palace of
>>>>> death."
>>>
>>>> Why did you post this twice? Judges may I have a ruling? Is this Seamus?
>>>
>>> No. It's not seamus. KWillis is just not listening to you.
>>>
>>> Interactions in misunderstanding between Usenet users unknown to each
>>> is the point of Ubi's crossposting troll. Ubi has set up a scenario
>>> encouraging strangers to flame each other. Always cut Ubi's crosspost
>>> in followup. Ubi is not your friend.
>>>
>>> Note to KWillis:
>>>
>>> People with severe peanut allergies do not tolerate well even miniscule
>>> exposure to the allergen. If a restaurant kitchen uses peanut oil in
>>> sauteeing or deep frying and fails to disclose that to diners, then
>>> that absolutely could cause an allergic reaction so severe it's life
>>> threatening. Food that isn't fried but prepared in such a kitchen will
>>> contain allergens because the droplets go everywhere.
>>>
>>> There. I tried to explain it to him. Let's see if he acknowledges it.
>>>
>>
>> L O L, thanks.
>>
>> You’re absolutely right that it’s airborne. I can’t even go into five guys
>> but I respect the fact that they plainly mark that they’re using peanut oil
>> in the kitchen. I think they must have bubbling vats of peanut oil to dump
>> the fries in or something because it’s like somebody set off teargas to me.
>
> Five Guys has boxes of peanuts for customers to shell and eat while they
> wait in line. They're a very peanut-forward establishment.
>
> Too bad you can't go there. The burgers are heavenly.
>

Boxes of peanuts aren’t instantly fatal. No matter what James Cameron says
about testosterone, having it roaring through my system enables me to
survive bars where the floor is covered with peanut shells. But God help me
if I go into a general nutrition type place that has the machine in the
corner making peanut mulch or whatever the hell it is.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On 12/7/22 1:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article
> <75033457.692129385.177902.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:11:37 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>
>>>>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>
>>>>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>
>>>>>> They cook everything in peanut oil
>>>
>>>>> This may be an issue for anyone with a peanut allergy, so they
>>>>> should avoid it at all cost. But this doesn't make it a "palace of
>>>>> death."
>>>
>>>> Why did you post this twice? Judges may I have a ruling? Is this Seamus?
>>>
>>> No. It's not seamus. KWillis is just not listening to you.
>>>
>>> Interactions in misunderstanding between Usenet users unknown to each
>>> is the point of Ubi's crossposting troll. Ubi has set up a scenario
>>> encouraging strangers to flame each other. Always cut Ubi's crosspost
>>> in followup. Ubi is not your friend.
>>>
>>> Note to KWillis:
>>>
>>> People with severe peanut allergies do not tolerate well even miniscule
>>> exposure to the allergen. If a restaurant kitchen uses peanut oil in
>>> sauteeing or deep frying and fails to disclose that to diners, then
>>> that absolutely could cause an allergic reaction so severe it's life
>>> threatening. Food that isn't fried but prepared in such a kitchen will
>>> contain allergens because the droplets go everywhere.
>>>
>>> There. I tried to explain it to him. Let's see if he acknowledges it.
>>>
>>
>> L O L, thanks.
>>
>> You’re absolutely right that it’s airborne. I can’t even go into five guys
>> but I respect the fact that they plainly mark that they’re using peanut oil
>> in the kitchen. I think they must have bubbling vats of peanut oil to dump
>> the fries in or something because it’s like somebody set off teargas to me.
>
> Five Guys has boxes of peanuts for customers to shell and eat while they
> wait in line. They're a very peanut-forward establishment.
>
> Too bad you can't go there. The burgers are heavenly.

Thank God I'm vegan. I can see why you'd gravitate towards peanuts of
course.

On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:47:08 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

>KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:51:53 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
>> <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/6/2022 1:49 AM, KWills wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>
>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>
>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>>
>>> Coming from Anim it probably means they use peanut oil and/or peanuts.
>>
>> Ok. I don't understand what is so bad about that. Maybe not the
>> healthiest of choices, but bar someone having an allergy, it's not
>> going to make it a "palace of death."
>>
>
>It’s a palace of death for me and the hundreds of people they kill every
>year. There’s a reason they call Jimmy Carter history’s greatest monster.

Only idiots call President Carter history's greatest monster. He
wasn't the best President, but he was never any sort of monster.

--
Only one shopping day left until tomorrow!

On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:47:09 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

>KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:11:37 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>
>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>
>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>
>>> They cook everything in peanut oil
>>
>> This may be an issue for anyone with a peanut allergy, so they
>> should avoid it at all cost. But this doesn't make it a "palace of
>> death."
>
>Why did you post this twice? Judges may I have a ruling? Is this Seamus?

I didn't post it twice.
What do you gain from claiming something anyone with an interest
can check and see is false?

--
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.

On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:07:17 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
<dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

>On 12/7/2022 1:10 AM, KWills wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:51:53 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
>> <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/6/2022 1:49 AM, KWills wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>
>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>
>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>>
>>> Coming from Anim it probably means they use peanut oil and/or peanuts.
>>
>> Ok. I don't understand what is so bad about that. Maybe not the
>> healthiest of choices, but bar someone having an allergy, it's not
>> going to make it a "palace of death."
>>
>Anim has a _SEVERE_ peanut allergy.

I can only guess what that is like.

--
"Listen guv, I'm a ten-guv-a-day copper! Always have been, always will
be. If you want me to work on this case, I'm going to be calling you
guv all day long. It's all I know and it's all you need to know, guv."
- Shouting George

On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 10:31:19 PM UTC-5, Ubiquitous wrote:

I wouldn't feel too sorry for Chevy Chase - his net worth is $50 Million.

Irish Mike

In article <o3m2phtff5d3eeo7u8h0i5d4pfk4ssovoi@4ax.com>, KWills
<a@b.con> wrote:

> On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:47:08 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> >KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:51:53 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
> >> <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 12/6/2022 1:49 AM, KWills wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Another poison palace of death.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
> >>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
> >>>>
> >>> Coming from Anim it probably means they use peanut oil and/or peanuts.
> >>
> >> Ok. I don't understand what is so bad about that. Maybe not the
> >> healthiest of choices, but bar someone having an allergy, it's not
> >> going to make it a "palace of death."
> >>
> >
> >It’s a palace of death for me and the hundreds of people they kill every
> >year. There’s a reason they call Jimmy Carter history’s greatest monster.
>
> Only idiots call President Carter history's greatest monster. He
> wasn't the best President, but he was never any sort of monster.

It's a line from The Simpsons. Jeez.

KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:47:09 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:11:37 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>>
>>>> They cook everything in peanut oil
>>>
>>> This may be an issue for anyone with a peanut allergy, so they
>>> should avoid it at all cost. But this doesn't make it a "palace of
>>> death."
>>
>> Why did you post this twice? Judges may I have a ruling? Is this Seamus?
>
> I didn't post it twice.
> What do you gain from claiming something anyone with an interest
> can check and see is false?
>

Are you sure this ignorant lying asshole isn’t Seamus?

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:07:17 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
> <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>
>> On 12/7/2022 1:10 AM, KWills wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:51:53 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
>>> <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/6/2022 1:49 AM, KWills wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>>>
>>>> Coming from Anim it probably means they use peanut oil and/or peanuts.
>>>
>>> Ok. I don't understand what is so bad about that. Maybe not the
>>> healthiest of choices, but bar someone having an allergy, it's not
>>> going to make it a "palace of death."
>>>
>> Anim has a _SEVERE_ peanut allergy.
>
> I can only guess what that is like.
>

I hope you find out.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:47:08 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:51:53 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
>>> <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/6/2022 1:49 AM, KWills wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>>>
>>>> Coming from Anim it probably means they use peanut oil and/or peanuts.
>>>
>>> Ok. I don't understand what is so bad about that. Maybe not the
>>> healthiest of choices, but bar someone having an allergy, it's not
>>> going to make it a "palace of death."
>>>
>>
>> It’s a palace of death for me and the hundreds of people they kill every
>> year. There’s a reason they call Jimmy Carter history’s greatest monster.
>
> Only idiots call President Carter history's greatest monster. He
> wasn't the best President, but he was never any sort of monster.
>

You just never tire of reveling in your own willful ignorance, do you?

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

anim8rfsk wrote:
> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:11:37 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>
>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>
>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>
>>> They cook everything in peanut oil
>>
>> This may be an issue for anyone with a peanut allergy, so they
>> should avoid it at all cost. But this doesn't make it a "palace of
>> death."
>>
>
> Why did you post this twice? Judges may I have a ruling? Is this Seamus?
>
https://www.google.com/search?q=KWills,+convicted&filter=0&biw=1360&bih=625&dpr=1

A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> In article <o3m2phtff5d3eeo7u8h0i5d4pfk4ssovoi@4ax.com>, KWills
> <a@b.con> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:47:08 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:51:53 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
>>>> <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/6/2022 1:49 AM, KWills wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Coming from Anim it probably means they use peanut oil and/or peanuts.
>>>>
>>>> Ok. I don't understand what is so bad about that. Maybe not the
>>>> healthiest of choices, but bar someone having an allergy, it's not
>>>> going to make it a "palace of death."
>>>>
>>>
>>> It’s a palace of death for me and the hundreds of people they kill every
>>> year. There’s a reason they call Jimmy Carter history’s greatest monster.
>>
>> Only idiots call President Carter history's greatest monster. He
>> wasn't the best President, but he was never any sort of monster.
>
>
> It's a line from The Simpsons. Jeez.
>

No one can be this stupid and still type. We’re being trolled.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

William Stickers <bill.stickers@noneya.net> wrote:
> anim8rfsk wrote:
>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:11:37 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>>
>>>> They cook everything in peanut oil
>>>
>>> This may be an issue for anyone with a peanut allergy, so they
>>> should avoid it at all cost. But this doesn't make it a "palace of
>>> death."
>>>
>>
>> Why did you post this twice? Judges may I have a ruling? Is this Seamus?
>>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=KWills,+convicted&filter=0&biw=1360&bih=625&dpr=1
>

That explains a lot

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

In article <o3m2phtff5d3eeo7u8h0i5d4pfk4ssovoi@4ax.com>, a@b.con wrote:
> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:

>> It�s a palace of death for me and the hundreds of people they kill every
>> year. There�s a reason they call Jimmy Carter history�s greatest monster.
>
> Only idiots call President Carter history's greatest monster.

TROLL-O-METER
5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:47:08 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

>KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:51:53 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
>> <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/6/2022 1:49 AM, KWills wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>
>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>
>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>>
>>> Coming from Anim it probably means they use peanut oil and/or peanuts.
>>
>> Ok. I don't understand what is so bad about that. Maybe not the
>> healthiest of choices, but bar someone having an allergy, it's not
>> going to make it a "palace of death."
>>
>
>It’s a palace of death for me and the hundreds of people they kill every
>year. There’s a reason they call Jimmy Carter history’s greatest monster.

Peanut allergies are nature's way of thinning the herd.

KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

> Only idiots call President Carter history's greatest monster. He
>wasn't the best President, but he was never any sort of monster.

You crossposted to a tv newsgroup. If you are willfully oblivious to a
cultural reference from television, then you're trolling and should just
fuck off.

anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:47:09 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:11:37 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> KWills <a@b.con> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:21:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another poison palace of death.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've never eaten anything from Raising Cane as far as I know. As
>>>>>> such, I can't know much about it. But what makes it so bad?
>>>>>
>>>>> They cook everything in peanut oil
>>>>
>>>> This may be an issue for anyone with a peanut allergy, so they
>>>> should avoid it at all cost. But this doesn't make it a "palace of
>>>> death."
>>>
>>> Why did you post this twice? Judges may I have a ruling? Is this Seamus?
>>
>> I didn't post it twice.
>> What do you gain from claiming something anyone with an interest
>> can check and see is false?
>>
>
>Are you sure this ignorant lying asshole isn't Seamus?

This ignorant lying asshole isn't seamus.

On 2022-12-05 13:21:25 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> Through the extensive ad campaign, Chase and Raising Cane
>
> Another poison palace of death.

At least he's now found a job that suits his "talent". :-p

On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 07:53:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

>> Only idiots call President Carter history's greatest monster. He
>> wasn't the best President, but he was never any sort of monster.
>
>You just never tire of reveling in your own willful ignorance, do you?

A person is ignorant because they aren't up on Simpson trivia? (My
daughter's the Simpson's trivia contest buff in our house - she's
actually competed and scored well in them - whereas I've watched a few
episodes but wouldn't claim enclopedic knowledge unlike her)

The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 07:53:25 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>> Only idiots call President Carter history's greatest monster. He
>>> wasn't the best President, but he was never any sort of monster.
>>
>> You just never tire of reveling in your own willful ignorance, do you?
>
> A person is ignorant because they aren't up on Simpson trivia?

A troll (a troll isn’t a person) isn’t up on Simpsons trivia because
they’re willfully ignorant.

(My
> daughter's the Simpson's trivia contest buff in our house - she's
> actually competed and scored well in them - whereas I've watched a few
> episodes but wouldn't claim enclopedic knowledge unlike her)
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chase was the worst thing in "Caddyshack."
>

Hmmm. I like Chase there, but everybody else is so good, that what you say
may still be right.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

In article
<680889257.692245738.741738.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:

> RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Chase was the worst thing in "Caddyshack."
> >
>
> Hmmm. I like Chase there, but everybody else is so good, that what you say
> may still be right.

Didn't they add Chase after they'd first finished the film?

A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> In article
> <680889257.692245738.741738.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Chase was the worst thing in "Caddyshack."
>>>
>>
>> Hmmm. I like Chase there, but everybody else is so good, that what you say
>> may still be right.
>
>
> Didn't they add Chase after they'd first finished the film?
>

Not unless the film was only about half an hour without him.

They did add the sequence with him and Bill Murray that they just sort of
ad-libbed because they realized the two of them never appeared together.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

In article
<1795777091.692250746.369701.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:

> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <680889257.692245738.741738.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
> > anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Chase was the worst thing in "Caddyshack."
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hmmm. I like Chase there, but everybody else is so good, that what you say
> >> may still be right.
> >
> >
> > Didn't they add Chase after they'd first finished the film?
> >
>
> Not unless the film was only about half an hour without him.
>
> They did add the sequence with him and Bill Murray that they just sort of
> ad-libbed because they realized the two of them never appeared together.

OK thanks

A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> In article
> <1795777091.692250746.369701.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <680889257.692245738.741738.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
>>> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Chase was the worst thing in "Caddyshack."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm. I like Chase there, but everybody else is so good, that what you say
>>>> may still be right.
>>>
>>>
>>> Didn't they add Chase after they'd first finished the film?
>>>
>>
>> Not unless the film was only about half an hour without him.
>>
>> They did add the sequence with him and Bill Murray that they just sort of
>> ad-libbed because they realized the two of them never appeared together.
>
> OK thanks
>

I dug through the trivia on IMDb (much of which is just astonishingly,
provably, obviously untrue) and multiple entries say that the gopher was an
afterthought!

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.