A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>
>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>
>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>
>>
>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>
>
>
> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>

I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On 2/20/23 6:41 AM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <8XHIL.1107130$vBI8.96616@fx15.iad>, trotsky
> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/19/23 5:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>> In article <tsu61d$goal$1@dont-email.me>, Alan Smithee <alms@last.inc>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Starsky and Hutch to return as Fox announces major change to characters
>>>>
>>>> The hit 1970s detective drama will make its long-awaited comeback with
>>>> two female characters in the titular roles.
>>>>
>>>> A remake of the iconic cop show, Starsky and Hutch is officially in the
>>>> works and expected to land on screens later this year. However, new
>>>> stars will be at the helm of the show as Fox confirmed the drama will be
>>>> female-led.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1736500/Starsky-and-Hutch-female-
>>>> reboot-Fox
>>>
>>>
>>> They're trying to make it interesting. They will fail.
>>
>>
>> Why?
>
>
> I don't think there's any appetite for this. They might have tried
> doing something entirely original, but it appears they didn't have the
> guts.
>
> The original had David Soul, an actor who was kinda spooky and weird.
> That worked.

Any of these "remakes" take way too much license to have much or any
bearing on the original. Thus this show depends entirely on the cast
and the production. I'm sure you would have said the same about a show
about Wednesday Addams.

On 2/20/23 6:43 AM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>
>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>
>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>
>>
>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>
>
>
> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.

Much like Ian's intellect.

On 2/20/23 4:55 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>
>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>
>>>
>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>
>
> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable

Are you still HIV positive then?

In article <OaTIL.739748$MVg8.655867@fx12.iad>, trotsky
<gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

> On 2/20/23 6:41 AM, A Friend wrote:
> > In article <8XHIL.1107130$vBI8.96616@fx15.iad>, trotsky
> > <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/19/23 5:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
> >>> In article <tsu61d$goal$1@dont-email.me>, Alan Smithee <alms@last.inc>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Starsky and Hutch to return as Fox announces major change to characters
> >>>>
> >>>> The hit 1970s detective drama will make its long-awaited comeback with
> >>>> two female characters in the titular roles.
> >>>>
> >>>> A remake of the iconic cop show, Starsky and Hutch is officially in the
> >>>> works and expected to land on screens later this year. However, new
> >>>> stars will be at the helm of the show as Fox confirmed the drama will be
> >>>> female-led.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1736500/Starsky-and-Hutch-fema
> >>>> le-
> >>>> reboot-Fox
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> They're trying to make it interesting. They will fail.
> >>
> >>
> >> Why?
> >
> >
> > I don't think there's any appetite for this. They might have tried
> > doing something entirely original, but it appears they didn't have the
> > guts.
> >
> > The original had David Soul, an actor who was kinda spooky and weird.
> > That worked.
>
>
> Any of these "remakes" take way too much license to have much or any
> bearing on the original. Thus this show depends entirely on the cast
> and the production. I'm sure you would have said the same about a show
> about Wednesday Addams.

I wouldn't have said anything about a show with Wednesday Addams in it,
and I have no idea why you think I would. I have no interest in that
sort of thing. I have no interest in revivals generally.

On 2023-02-19 2:58 p.m., Alan Smithee wrote:
> Starsky and Hutch to return as Fox announces major change to characters
>
> The hit 1970s detective drama will make its long-awaited comeback with
> two female characters in the titular roles.
>
> A remake of the iconic cop show, Starsky and Hutch is officially in the
> works and expected to land on screens later this year. However, new
> stars will be at the helm of the show as Fox confirmed the drama will be
> female-led.
>
> https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1736500/Starsky-and-Hutch-female-reboot-Fox

It was a terrible show. I don't care what they do with it.

On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:

> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>
>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>
>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>
>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>
> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable

Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.

--
"Who would ever do this to him!?" - HottCiara on DOOL (04-27-2020), asking
who would stab Victor Kirakis... How about ANYONE WHO'S EVER MET HIM??!!

On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:55:23 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

>A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>
>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>
>>>
>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>
>
>I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable

So long as you don't have Pharmacy Girl providing you your meds I
think you've got a shot.

In article <tt142r$th01$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
<IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:

> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>
> > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
> >> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
> >>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
> >>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
> >>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
> >>>>
> >>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
> >>>> remembered that one of them had died.
> >>>
> >>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
> >>
> >> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
> >> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
> >
> > I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>
> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.

I suppose part of that is aimed at me, although I don't know which half
of the insult I'm supposed to be annoyed by.

Surviving into your late 70s these days in the U.S. is not remarkable
or astonishing or any of that other simple-minded stuff. You're pretty
damn stupid if you think otherwise.

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:55:23 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>
>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>
>>
>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>
> So long as you don't have Pharmacy Girl providing you your meds I
> think you've got a shot.
>

Did I tell you she may be the emergency backup relief pharmacist at my
current pharmacy on the weekends?

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> In article <tt142r$th01$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
> <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>
>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>
>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>
>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>
>> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.
>
>
> I suppose part of that is aimed at me, although I don't know which half
> of the insult I'm supposed to be annoyed by.
>
> Surviving into your late 70s these days in the U.S. is not remarkable
> or astonishing or any of that other simple-minded stuff. You're pretty
> damn stupid if you think otherwise.
>

Obamacare has made it remarkably difficult.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 22:30:47 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

>shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:55:23 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>
>> So long as you don't have Pharmacy Girl providing you your meds I
>> think you've got a shot.
>>
>
>Did I tell you she may be the emergency backup relief pharmacist at my
>current pharmacy on the weekends?

It's been nice knowing you. I hope you've written an explanatory note
to let the cops know what likely happened in the case of your sudden
demise.

On 2/20/23 11:30 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> In article <tt142r$th01$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
>> <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>>
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>>
>>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>>
>>> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.
>>
>>
>> I suppose part of that is aimed at me, although I don't know which half
>> of the insult I'm supposed to be annoyed by.
>>
>> Surviving into your late 70s these days in the U.S. is not remarkable
>> or astonishing or any of that other simple-minded stuff. You're pretty
>> damn stupid if you think otherwise.
>>
>
> Obamacare has made it remarkably difficult.

Sure, just like trying to figure out what "native resolution" is.

On 2/20/23 6:43 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>
>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I
>>>>> thought I
>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>
>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid  *again*?
>>>
>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79.  I
>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>
>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>
> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.

Is there ever a time when Ian isn't butt hurt? Not with his
proclivities I'm sure.

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 22:30:47 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:55:23 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>>
>>> So long as you don't have Pharmacy Girl providing you your meds I
>>> think you've got a shot.
>>>
>>
>> Did I tell you she may be the emergency backup relief pharmacist at my
>> current pharmacy on the weekends?
>
> It's been nice knowing you. I hope you've written an explanatory note
> to let the cops know what likely happened in the case of your sudden
> demise.
>

She wears a Covid mask at all times and never waits on me. It could be her.
I won’t know until I’ve gone full Boston Brand.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On 2023-02-21 05:30:48 +0000, anim8rfsk said:

> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> In article <tt142r$th01$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
>> <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>>
>>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>>
>>> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.
>>
>> I suppose part of that is aimed at me, although I don't know which half
>> of the insult I'm supposed to be annoyed by.
>>
>> Surviving into your late 70s these days in the U.S. is not remarkable
>> or astonishing or any of that other simple-minded stuff. You're pretty
>> damn stupid if you think otherwise.

Hey, look! Trotsky's pathetic minion doubles-down on defending the
psychopath! And on *STOOPID*!!

> Obamacare has made it remarkably difficult.

Among many other things, like Gless being a drinker and smoker!!

--
"Who would ever do this to him!?" - HottCiara on DOOL (04-27-2020), asking
who would stab Victor Kirakis... How about ANYONE WHO'S EVER MET HIM??!!

On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 04:31:47 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

>shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 22:30:47 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:55:23 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>>>
>>>> So long as you don't have Pharmacy Girl providing you your meds I
>>>> think you've got a shot.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did I tell you she may be the emergency backup relief pharmacist at my
>>> current pharmacy on the weekends?
>>
>> It's been nice knowing you. I hope you've written an explanatory note
>> to let the cops know what likely happened in the case of your sudden
>> demise.
>>
>
>She wears a Covid mask at all times and never waits on me. It could be her.
>I won’t know until I’ve gone full Boston Brand.

Maybe it isn't Pharmacy Girl but her sister. The nice one.
She's the one that will make sure you get the right medicine on time..
Oh, what am I thinking. We know how your luck is.

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 04:31:47 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 22:30:47 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:55:23 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I thought I
>>>>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>>>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>>>>
>>>>> So long as you don't have Pharmacy Girl providing you your meds I
>>>>> think you've got a shot.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did I tell you she may be the emergency backup relief pharmacist at my
>>>> current pharmacy on the weekends?
>>>
>>> It's been nice knowing you. I hope you've written an explanatory note
>>> to let the cops know what likely happened in the case of your sudden
>>> demise.
>>>
>>
>> She wears a Covid mask at all times and never waits on me. It could be her.
>> I won’t know until I’ve gone full Boston Brand.
>
> Maybe it isn't Pharmacy Girl but her sister. The nice one.
> She's the one that will make sure you get the right medicine on time..
> Oh, what am I thinking. We know how your luck is.
>

Lol. She actually has an older sister who looks just like her.. But she
wasn’t in the pharmacy business.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

In article <tt2hn3$15b2v$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
<IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:

> On 2023-02-21 05:30:48 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>
> > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> In article <tt142r$th01$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
> >> <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
> >>> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
> >>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
> >>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
> >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I
> >>>>>>> thought I
> >>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
> >>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
> >>>
> >>> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.
> >>
> >> I suppose part of that is aimed at me, although I don't know which half
> >> of the insult I'm supposed to be annoyed by.
> >>
> >> Surviving into your late 70s these days in the U.S. is not remarkable
> >> or astonishing or any of that other simple-minded stuff. You're pretty
> >> damn stupid if you think otherwise.
>
> Hey, look! Trotsky's pathetic minion doubles-down on defending the
> psychopath! And on *STOOPID*!!

Thanks for proving my point.

In article <o10JL.1520562$GNG9.159179@fx18.iad>, trotsky
<gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

> On 2/20/23 6:43 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
> > On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
> >
> >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
> >>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
> >>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
> >>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I
> >>>>> thought I
> >>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
> >>>>
> >>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid  *again*?
> >>>
> >>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79.  I
> >>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
> >>
> >> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
> >
> > Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.
>
>
> Is there ever a time when Ian isn't butt hurt? Not with his
> proclivities I'm sure.

I think the nerves must wear out after a while.

On 2/21/23 4:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <tt2hn3$15b2v$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
> <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2023-02-21 05:30:48 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>
>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <tt142r$th01$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
>>>> <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I
>>>>>>>>> thought I
>>>>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>>>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose part of that is aimed at me, although I don't know which half
>>>> of the insult I'm supposed to be annoyed by.
>>>>
>>>> Surviving into your late 70s these days in the U.S. is not remarkable
>>>> or astonishing or any of that other simple-minded stuff. You're pretty
>>>> damn stupid if you think otherwise.
>>
>> Hey, look! Trotsky's pathetic minion doubles-down on defending the
>> psychopath! And on *STOOPID*!!
>
>
> Thanks for proving my point.

Ian's gone even further off the deep end than usual. His panties must
be in several knots.

On 2/21/23 4:13 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <o10JL.1520562$GNG9.159179@fx18.iad>, trotsky
> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/23 6:43 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>>
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I
>>>>>>> thought I
>>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid  *again*?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79.  I
>>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>>
>>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>>
>>> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad minion.
>>
>>
>> Is there ever a time when Ian isn't butt hurt? Not with his
>> proclivities I'm sure.
>
>
> I think the nerves must wear out after a while.

In "his" case the brain might have worn out first.

In article <vqcJL.836491$8_id.795690@fx09.iad>, trotsky
<gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

> On 2/21/23 4:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> > In article <tt2hn3$15b2v$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
> > <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2023-02-21 05:30:48 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
> >>
> >>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >>>> In article <tt142r$th01$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
> >>>> <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
> >>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
> >>>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I
> >>>>>>>>> thought I
> >>>>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
> >>>>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad
> >>>>> minion.
> >>>>
> >>>> I suppose part of that is aimed at me, although I don't know which half
> >>>> of the insult I'm supposed to be annoyed by.
> >>>>
> >>>> Surviving into your late 70s these days in the U.S. is not remarkable
> >>>> or astonishing or any of that other simple-minded stuff. You're pretty
> >>>> damn stupid if you think otherwise.
> >>
> >> Hey, look! Trotsky's pathetic minion doubles-down on defending the
> >> psychopath! And on *STOOPID*!!
> >
> >
> > Thanks for proving my point.
>
>
> Ian's gone even further off the deep end than usual. His panties must
> be in several knots.

Also, this month's drugs don't ship for another week. I hope he has a
rubber slab to bite down on.

On 2/21/23 5:29 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <vqcJL.836491$8_id.795690@fx09.iad>, trotsky
> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/21/23 4:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>> In article <tt2hn3$15b2v$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
>>> <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-02-21 05:30:48 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>>>
>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <tt142r$th01$1@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
>>>>>> <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 22:55:23 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>>>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <g_HIL.1107132$vBI8.761766@fx15.iad>, trotsky
>>>>>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/23 8:04 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-20 01:55:21 +0000, Rhino said:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-19 8:43 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/19/2023 07:09 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're trying to make it interesting.  They will fail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will they do an all male 'cagney and lacey'?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, but the males will actually be trans-men.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Amazingly, both Tyne Daly and Sharon Gless are still alive - I
>>>>>>>>>>> thought I
>>>>>>>>>>> remembered that one of them had died.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Christ, are you phishing to be called stupid *again*?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tyne Daly is 76 (she turns 77 tomorrow) and Sharon Gless is 79. I
>>>>>>>>> don't think making it to your late 70s is remarkable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think making it to 70 at all is going to be pretty remarkable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure. But you can't explain that to the psychopath and his kneepad
>>>>>>> minion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suppose part of that is aimed at me, although I don't know which half
>>>>>> of the insult I'm supposed to be annoyed by.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Surviving into your late 70s these days in the U.S. is not remarkable
>>>>>> or astonishing or any of that other simple-minded stuff. You're pretty
>>>>>> damn stupid if you think otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> Hey, look! Trotsky's pathetic minion doubles-down on defending the
>>>> psychopath! And on *STOOPID*!!
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for proving my point.
>>
>>
>> Ian's gone even further off the deep end than usual. His panties must
>> be in several knots.
>
>
> Also, this month's drugs don't ship for another week. I hope he has a
> rubber slab to bite down on.

The interesting thing to me is I do almost nothing to provoke other than
respond to other people. And you're pretty much the Switzerland of the
group, how the fuck he managed to take umbrage with you is beyond
anyone's guess. But he and his ilk aren't here to show how well
balanced they are of course.