The asswipe asserted:

> In article <u886g0$17pkb$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The a%ipe asserted:
>>
>>> In article <u85hpi$qum2$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The a%ipe asserted:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You really have the mind in the gutter Idlehands-mouth
>>>>> Solar Penguin!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My mind is in the gutter because I _don’t_ want to give
>>>> you oral sex? How does that work?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your mind is in the gutter for thinking oral sex!!
>>
>> You’re the one who asked me for oral sex in the first place!
>> How many gutters is your mind in?
>>
>
> I never would ask you for that Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin!
>

Lying asswipe!

The asswipe asserted:

> In article <u89pcq$1du0f$2@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The asswipe asserted:
>>
>>> In article <u886g0$17pkb$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The asswipe asserted:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <u85hpi$qum2$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The asswipe asserted:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You really have the mind in the gutter Idlehands-mouth
>>>>>>> Solar Penguin!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My mind is in the gutter because I _don’t_ want
>>>>>> to give you oral sex? How does that work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your mind is in the gutter for thinking oral sex!!
>>>>
>>>> You’re the one who asked me for oral sex in the
>>>> first place! How many gutters is your mind in?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I never would ask you for that Idlehands-mouth Solar
>>> Penguin!
>>>
>>
>> Lying asswipe!
>>
>
> Lying Idlehands-mouth SP for you1

Look, stop sulking and just accept it. You are never going
to get a blowjob from me, ever!

--

solar penguin

On 2023-07-08 9:38 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <u8biko$1nuhh$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The a%ipe asserted:
>>
>>> In article <u89pcq$1du0f$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The a%ipe asserted:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <u886g0$17pkb$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The a%ipe asserted:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <u85hpi$qum2$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The a%ipe asserted:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You really have the mind in the gutter Idlehands-mouth
>>>>>>>>> Solar Penguin!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My mind is in the gutter because I _don’t_ want
>>>>>>>> to give you oral sex? How does that work?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your mind is in the gutter for thinking oral sex!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You’re the one who asked me for oral sex in the
>>>>>> first place! How many gutters is your mind in?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I never would ask you for that Idlehands-mouth Solar
>>>>> Penguin!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lying a%ipe!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Lying Idlehands-mouth SP for you1
>>
>> Look, stop sulking and just accept it. You are never going
>> to get a blowjob from me, ever!
>>
>
> iNo oral sex here! No homosexual sex here!!
>

Just jacking off...I mean being attacked by a succubus.

That's what happens when you hide in mummy's basement.

--
"He who establishes his argument by noise and command shows that his
reason is weak." Michel Eyquem de Montaigne

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tim typed:
>
>> Dracula's feathers?
>>
>
> Carmilla’s cloaca!
>
> (We are playing “Name a fictional vampire and part of
> a bird’s anatomy,” aren’t we?)
>

We seem to’ve gotten distracted and neglected the game.
Let’s start it up again and see if we can get a long cascade
of vampires and bird parts.

Orlok’s beak.

--

solar penguin

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Tim typed:
>>
>>> Dracula's feathers?
>>>
>>
>> Carmilla’s cloaca!
>>
>> (We are playing “Name a fictional vampire and part of
>> a bird’s anatomy,” aren’t we?)
>>
>
> We seem to’ve gotten distracted and neglected the game.
> Let’s start it up again and see if we can get a long cascade
> of vampires and bird parts.
>
> Orlok’s beak.
>

Lestat’s gizzard.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Tim typed:
>>>
>>>> Dracula's feathers?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Carmilla’s cloaca!
>>>
>>> (We are playing “Name a fictional vampire and part of
>>> a bird’s anatomy,” aren’t we?)
>>>
>>
>> We seem to’ve gotten distracted and neglected the game.
>> Let’s start it up again and see if we can get a long cascade
>> of vampires and bird parts.
>>
>> Orlok’s beak.
>>
>
> Lestat’s gizzard.
>

Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real thing!)

--

solar penguin

tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 3:21:45 AM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Tim typed:
>>>
>>>> Dracula's feathers?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Carmilla’s cloaca!
>>>
>>> (We are playing “Name a fictional vampire and part of
>>> a bird’s anatomy,” aren’t we?)
>>>
>>
>> We seem to’ve gotten distracted and neglected the game.
>> Let’s start it up again and see if we can get a long cascade
>> of vampires and bird parts.
>
> LOL!
>>
>> Orlok’s beak.
>
> Edward Cullen's Talons.
>

Queen Camilla’s syrinx.

(That’s the Queen Camilla from ‘State of Decay’, not the
one Daniel is thinking of!)

--

solar penguin

The asswipe asked:

> In article <f451b34d-a7f0-46e5-8d65-393443640901n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 3:21:45 AM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Tim typed:
>>>>
>>>>> Dracula's feathers?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Carmilla’s cloaca!
>>>>
>>>> (We are playing “Name a fictional vampire and part
>>>> of a bird’s anatomy,” aren’t we?)
>>>>
>>>
>>> We seem to’ve gotten distracted and neglected the
>>> game. Let’s start it up again and see if we can get
>>> a long cascade of vampires and bird parts.
>>
>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Orlok’s beak.
>>
>> Edward Cullen's Talons.
>
> What about your fingernails?

What part of “Name a fictional vampire and part of a bird’s
anatomy,” don’t you understand?

--

solar penguin

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 3:21:45 AM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Tim typed:
>>>>
>>>>> Dracula's feathers?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Carmilla’s cloaca!
>>>>
>>>> (We are playing “Name a fictional vampire and part of
>>>> a bird’s anatomy,” aren’t we?)
>>>>
>>>
>>> We seem to’ve gotten distracted and neglected the game.
>>> Let’s start it up again and see if we can get a long cascade
>>> of vampires and bird parts.
>>
>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Orlok’s beak.
>>
>> Edward Cullen's Talons.
>>
>
> Queen Camilla’s syrinx.
>
> (That’s the Queen Camilla from ‘State of Decay’, not the
> one Daniel is thinking of!)
>

Nosferatu’s keel.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <u8ggrp$2g541$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real thing!)
>
> They are!

They are? That's good. Show me a picture of some so, real ones that is
obviously...

solar penguin wrote:

>
> The asswipe asked:
> >
> > What about your fingernails?
>
> What part of “Name a fictional vampire and part of a bird’s
> anatomy,” don’t you understand?

Only the “Name a fictional vampire and part of a bird’s anatomy” bit...

Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <u8ggrp$2g541$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real thing!)
>>
>> They are!
>
> They are? That's good. Show me a picture of some so, real ones that is
> obviously...
>

The idiot doesn’t know his Bible. Again. Angels have no wings, canonically.
Those are part of the later mythology.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Last Doctor wrote:

> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <u8ggrp$2g541$1@dont-email.me>,
> >> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real thing!)
> >>
> >> They are!
> >
> > They are? That's good. Show me a picture of some so, real ones that is
> > obviously...
>
> The idiot doesn’t know his Bible. Again. Angels have no wings,
> canonically.

Dave doesn't know his Bible? Say it ain't so?!

I am so shocked by this revelation... :-)

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <u8hkv0$2jr7b$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <u8ggrp$2g541$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real thing!)
> >>>
> >>> They are!
> >>
> >> They are? That's good. Show me a picture of some so, real ones that
> >> is obviously...
> >
> > The idiot doesn’t know his Bible. Again. Angels have no wings,
> > canonically. Those are part of the later mythology.
>
> Yet another John LEnin talkes!

You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.

If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble proving it
then should you?

The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

>
> The idiot doesn’t know his Bible. Again. Angels have
> no wings, canonically. Those are part of the later mythology.
>

To be fair, it depends on the type of angel. Humanoid angels
didn’t have wings, nor did those eldritch ones that look
like rings with eyes, but Biblical cherubim were like winged
sphinxes. (Not the cute Cupids we normally associate
with cherubs but still winged anyway.)

--

solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 11/7/23 4:06 pm:
> In article <nnd$75df5bfc$3183afbc@16cee562e34b89a2>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

<Snip>

>> You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.
>>
>> If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble proving it
>> then should you?
>
> I tought Stalin was a Lenin disciple.
>
"tought"??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$75df5bfc$3183afbc@16cee562e34b89a2>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <u8hkv0$2jr7b$1@dont-email.me>,
> >> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >> >Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> >> The Doctor wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> In article <u8ggrp$2g541$1@dont-email.me>,
> >> >>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real thing!)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> They are!
> >> >>
> >> >> They are? That's good. Show me a picture of some so, real ones
> >> >> that is obviously...
> >> >
> >> > The idiot doesn’t know his Bible. Again. Angels have no wings,
> >> > canonically. Those are part of the later mythology.
> >>
> >> Yet another John LEnin talkes!
> >
> > You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.
> >
> > If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble proving it
> > then should you?
>
> I thought Stalin was a Lenin disciple. [corrected]

Once again, Dave avoids answering a question.

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:

> 1400 On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 11:06:51 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
> > In article <nnd$75df5bfc$3183afbc@16cee562e34b89a2>,
> > Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > > The Doctor wrote:
> > >
> > >> In article <u8hkv0$2jr7b$1...@dont-email.me>,
> > >> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> > >> >Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > >> >> The Doctor wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> In article <u8ggrp$2g541$1...@dont-email.me>,
> > >> >>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real thing!)
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> They are!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> They are? That's good. Show me a picture of some so, real ones
> > >> >> that is obviously...
> > >> >
> > >> > The idiot doesn’t know his Bible. Again. Angels have no wings,
> > >> > canonically. Those are part of the later mythology.
> > >>
> > >> Yet another John LEnin talkes!
> > >
> > > You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.
> > >
> > > If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble proving
> > > it then should you?
> >
> > I thought Stalin was a Lenin disciple. [corrected]
>
> What does that have to do with the possible flying appendages of angels?

It doesn't! It's just Dave's way of not answering a question. It's what
he does. He makes a claim, then when he's asked to back it up, he moves
the goal-posts and goes off on a tangent.

Dave absolutely CANNOT back up his beliefs! He's like an automaton that
just blindly parrots what he's been told. He has no free thinking
whatsoever.

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 4:52:41 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote on 11/7/23 4:06 pm:
> > > In article <nnd$75df5bfc$3183afbc@16cee562e34b89a2>,
> > > Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > <Snip>
> > >> You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.
> > >>
> > >> If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble proving
> > it >> then should you?
> > >
> > > I tought Stalin was a Lenin disciple.
> > >
> > "tought"??
>
> As in "I tought I saw a putty cat!".

Yes.

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <0c79de5e-b3d7-42cf-bb17-19b5e837afcfn@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1400 On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 11:06:51 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
> >> In article <nnd$75df5bfc$3183afbc@16cee562e34b89a2>,
> >> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> >The Doctor wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In article <u8hkv0$2jr7b$1...@dont-email.me>,
> >> >> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >> >> >Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> >> >> The Doctor wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> In article <u8ggrp$2g541$1...@dont-email.me>,
> >> >> >>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real thing!)
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> They are!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> They are? That's good. Show me a picture of some so, real ones
> >> >> >> that is obviously...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The idiot doesn’t know his Bible. Again. Angels have no wings,
> >> >> > canonically. Those are part of the later mythology.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yet another John LEnin talkes!
> >> >
> >> >You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.
> >> >
> >> >If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble proving
> >> >it then should you?
> >>
> >> I tought Stalin was a Lenin disciple.
> >
> > What does that have to do with the possible flying appendages of
> > angels?
>
> Note why I counter BS.

You don't counter anything you clown! You state that something
fantastical is real, then run away when asked to provide evidence of your
claim. If something is real you should have no problem proving it. But of
course, you can't!

I'll make it easy for you. Angels do not exist and are part of a
mythology that some simple minded people (yes, that means you) mistakenly
think is real.

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$40b1e31f$100847a1@0486840ad943d7fc>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <nnd$75df5bfc$3183afbc@16cee562e34b89a2>,
> >> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> > The Doctor wrote:
> >> >> Yet another John LEnin talkes!
> >> >
> >> > You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.
> >> >
> >> > If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble proving
> >> > it then should you?
> >>
> >> I thought Stalin was a Lenin disciple. [corrected]
> >
> > Once again, Dave avoids answering a question.
>
> You accuse me of rewriting history.

You do.

Where will we start so, the 13th Doctor?

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$6f6b9589$2048caf6@7108d28ad9618b6a>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> What does that have to do with the possible flying appendages of
> >> angels?
> >
> > It doesn't! It's just Dave's way of not answering a question. It's
> > what he does. He makes a claim, then when he's asked to back it up,
> > he moves the goal-posts and goes off on a tangent.
> >
> > Dave absolutely CANNOT back up his beliefs! He's like an automaton
> > that just blindly parrots what he's been told. He has no free thinking
> > whatsoever.
>
> Wrong! You accuse be of being like Stalin!

No Dave, I am right...

Blueshirt wrote on 11/07/2023 11:12 pm:
> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> 1400 On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 11:06:51 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <nnd$75df5bfc$3183afbc@16cee562e34b89a2>,
>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <u8hkv0$2jr7b$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <u8ggrp$2g541$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real thing!)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They are!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are? That's good. Show me a picture of some so, real ones
>>>>>>> that is obviously...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idiot doesn’t know his Bible. Again. Angels have no wings,
>>>>>> canonically. Those are part of the later mythology.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet another John LEnin talkes!
>>>>
>>>> You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.
>>>>
>>>> If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble proving
>>>> it then should you?
>>>
>>> I thought Stalin was a Lenin disciple. [corrected]
>>
>> What does that have to do with the possible flying appendages of angels?
>
> It doesn't! It's just Dave's way of not answering a question. It's what
> he does. He makes a claim, then when he's asked to back it up, he moves
> the goal-posts and goes off on a tangent.

Bullshit!! A tangent DOES have some contact with the original.

The asswipe NEVER has that sort of contact with reality!!

> Dave absolutely CANNOT back up his beliefs! He's like an automaton that
> just blindly parrots what he's been told. He has no free thinking
> whatsoever.
>
Yeap!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 12/07/2023 2:14 am:
> In article <nnd$6f6b9589$2048caf6@7108d28ad9618b6a>, Blueshirt
> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> 1400 On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 11:06:51 PM UTC-7, The Doctor
>>> wrote:
>>>> In article <nnd$75df5bfc$3183afbc@16cee562e34b89a2>, Blueshirt
>>>> <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <u8hkv0$2jr7b$1...@dont-email.me>, The Last
>>>>>> Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <u8ggrp$2g541$1...@dont-email.me>, solar
>>>>>>>>> penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Angel’s wings. (Which even sounds like a real
>>>>>>>>>> thing!)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They are!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They are? That's good. Show me a picture of some so,
>>>>>>>> real ones that is obviously...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The idiot doesn’t know his Bible. Again. Angels have no
>>>>>>> wings, canonically. Those are part of the later
>>>>>>> mythology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet another John LEnin talkes!
>>>>>
>>>>> You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble
>>>>> proving it then should you?
>>>>
>>>> I thought Stalin was a Lenin disciple. [corrected]
>>>
>>> What does that have to do with the possible flying appendages of
>>> angels?
>>
>> It doesn't! It's just Dave's way of not answering a question. It's
>> what he does. He makes a claim, then when he's asked to back it up,
>> he moves the goal-posts and goes off on a tangent.
>>
>> Dave absolutely CANNOT back up his beliefs! He's like an automaton
>> that just blindly parrots what he's been told. He has no free
>> thinking whatsoever.
>
> Wrong! You accuse be of being like Stalin!
>
Bullshit, asswipe, Blueshirt did not accuse 'be' (whomever that might
be!!) of anything, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 11/07/2023 10:39 pm:
> On Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 4:52:41 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 11/7/23 4:06 pm:
>>> In article <nnd$75df5bfc$3183afbc@16cee562e34b89a2>,
>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> <Snip>
>>>> You are like Stalin... re-writing history to suit yourself.
>>>>
>>>> If Angels having wings is real, you should have no trouble proving it
>>>> then should you?
>>>
>>> I tought Stalin was a Lenin disciple.
>>>
>> "tought"??
>
> As in "I tought I saw a putty cat!".
>
I thought that was "putty tat".
--
Daniel