In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
> >>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot
> >>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck
> >>>>>>>>> the taxpayer.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis
> >>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite?
> >>>>>>>>> So what will its new name be?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while
> >>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
> >>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
> >>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a
> >>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
> >>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
> >>>>>> level rise
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
> >>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when
> >>>>> I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
> >>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
> >>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
> >>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
> >>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
> >>>
> >>> Liar.
> >
> >> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
> >> everything around us goes to shit.
> >
> > Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
> > the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
> > underwater by 2011,
>
> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.

Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.

Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> > In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>> >>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>> >>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot
>> >>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck
>> >>>>>>>>> the taxpayer.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis
>> >>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite?
>> >>>>>>>>> So what will its new name be?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while
>> >>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>> >>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>> >>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a
>> >>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
>> >>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>> >>>>>> level rise
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>> >>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when
>> >>>>> I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>> >>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>> >>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>> >>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>> >>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>> >>>
>> >>> Liar.
>> >
>> >> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>> >> everything around us goes to shit.
>> >
>> > Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>> > the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>> > underwater by 2011,
>>
>> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
>
>Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
>of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
>results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.

Was Abraham Lincoln a white dude?

>Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
>whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
>kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.

Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>>Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
>>of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
>>results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.

>Was Abraham Lincoln a white dude?

Kind of left out some of the search results and related searc results.
Instead of a "yes" or "no" answer, results inserting race and racism
were ranked at the top or near the top.

https://digital.nls.uk/learning/struggles-for-liberty/themes/us-civil-war/abraham-lincoln-the-white-mens-president/

https://www.quora.com/Was-Abraham-Lincoln-a-racist-white-man

https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/1angab0/was_abraham_lincoln_racist/

https://www.nprillinois.org/statehouse/2004-02-01/lincoln-race-the-great-emancipator-didnt-advocate-racial-equality-but-was-he-a-racist

https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-white-supremacist-in-todays-standards

This question was submitted by CBS entertainment programming:

https://www.quora.com/Are-Iranians-white-or-Middle-Eastern

https://www.google.com/search&q=are+all+white+people+racist

All all white people racist?

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-lm&q=are+all+white+people+racist

There's overlap with the DDG search.

On 3/30/2024 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot the
>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck the
>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite? So what
>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while the
>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>
>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a DC
>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly very
>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when I
>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>
>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>
>>> Liar.
>
>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>> everything around us goes to shit.
>
> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
> of a, ya know, sea level rise.

"Between 1901 and 2018, average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10
in), an average of 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) per year. This rate
accelerated to 4.62 mm (0.182 in)/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate
change due to human activities is the main cause."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise

In article
<17c1a837bf6797c3$83382$1768716$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:

> On 3/30/2024 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> >>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
> >>>>>> level rise
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
> >>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when
> >>>>> I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
> >>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
> >>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
> >>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
> >>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
> >>>
> >>> Liar.
> >
> >> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
> >> everything around us goes to shit.
> >
> > Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
> > the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
> > underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
> > of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>
> "Between 1901 and 2018, average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10
> in), an average of 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) per year. This rate
> accelerated to 4.62 mm (0.182 in)/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate
> change due to human activities is the main cause."

And yet this sea level rise is apparent nowhere at any actual sea shore,
which means in 121 years the rise (if any) is so small it's beyond the
limits of human perception.

Yeah, that's certainly something to hysterically trash our economy and
radically alter our way of life over.

And Miami sure as shit ain't underwater, is it? In 2022, the ocean on
South Beach was at the same level it was in 2002.

In <uu4uaf$rmt$1@reader1.panix.com> danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> writes:

>In <N4mcnaFh6rVOdJj7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> writes:

>[snip]

>>>> Don't you remember St. Petersburg?
>>>
>>> St. Petersburg, Russia? Or Florida? In either case, I don't recall any
>>> bridge collapses in either place. Can you refresh my memory?

>I suspect the earlier poster is referring to this little
>even in Florida, but it was Sweetwater:

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_International_University_pedestrian_bridge_collapse

some more info on the FL bridge collapses:

[wsj]

Federal guidelines to protect bridges from vessel strikes were
drafted following the 1980 collapse of the Tampa Bay Sunshine
Skyway Bridge after a freighter rammed into one of its supports.
Bridges built before the guidelines were released in 1991 weren't
compelled to comply - but some areas have opted to
retrofit their bridges for safety. The Sunshine bridge has since
been rebuilt but wasn't among the eight that met the width and
height criteria used in the Journal's analysis.
=======
rest of a pretty good article, including diagrams:

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/these-eight-u-s-bridges-are-vulnerable-to-a-repeat-of-the-baltimore-crash-f2a2a057?st=8hwri6mbhpuuewf&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

On 3/30/24 4:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot
>>>>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck
>>>>>>>>>>> the taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis
>>>>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite?
>>>>>>>>>>> So what will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while
>>>>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a
>>>>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
>>>>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when
>>>>>>> I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>
>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>> underwater by 2011,
>>
>> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
>
> Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
> of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
> results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
>

So Google is the problem now? You can grow a pair of balls and provide
proof yourself, or you can scurry back into the woodwork like the
cockroach that you are. Your choice, cockroach.

> Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
> whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
> kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.

You made a claim that someone said something about "2011" and the claim
can't be verified because you're a piece of shit and a liar. Is any of
this getting through to you, Oath Keeper Cockroach?

On 3/30/24 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot the
>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck the
>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite? So what
>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while the
>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>
>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a DC
>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly very
>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when I
>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>
>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>
>>> Liar.
>
>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>> everything around us goes to shit.
>
> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
> of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>

Well, genius, NOAA (you know, REAL experts) say you're full of shit.

> Global sea level has been rising over the past century, and the rate has increased in recent decades. In 2014, global sea level was 2.6 inches 67 mm above the 1993 average—the highest annual average in the satellite record (1993-present). Sea level continues to rise at a rate of about one-eighth of an inch 3.2 mm per year.
>
> Higher sea levels mean that deadly and destructive storm surges push farther inland than they once did, which also means more frequent nuisance flooding. Disruptive and expensive, nuisance flooding is estimated to be from 300 percent to 900 percent more frequent within U.S. coastal communities than it was just 50 years ago.
>
> The two major causes of global sea level rise are thermal expansion caused by warming of the ocean (since water expands as it warms) and increased melting of land-based ice, such as glaciers and ice sheets. The ocean is absorbing more than 90 percent of the increased atmospheric heat associated with emissions from human activity.

And THEY don't play at knowing what they're talking about like you do.
You've been told this for decades.

> With continued ocean and atmospheric warming, sea levels will likely rise for many centuries at rates higher than that of the current century. In the United States, almost 40 percent of the population lives in relatively high-population-density coastal areas, where sea level plays a role in flooding, shoreline erosion, and hazards from storms. Globally, eight of the world's 10 largest cities are near a coast, according to the U.N. Atlas of the Oceans.

And you've been told this for decades.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot
>>>>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck
>>>>>>>>>>> the taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis
>>>>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite?
>>>>>>>>>>> So what will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while
>>>>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a
>>>>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
>>>>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when
>>>>>>> I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>
>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>> underwater by 2011,
>>
>> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
>
> Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
> of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
> results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
>
> Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
> whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
> kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
>
You've been told this for decades.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/30/24 5:31 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/30/2024 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>     "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
>>>>>>>>>> government
>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency
>>>>>>>>>> foot the
>>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the
>>>>>>>>>> Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite?
>>>>>>>>>> So what
>>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today
>>>>>>>>> while the
>>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to
>>>>>>> read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
>>>>>>> rebuilt.
>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I
>>>>>> was a DC
>>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
>>>>>> very
>>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and
>>>>>>> sea
>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea
>>>>>> level
>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me;
>>>>>> when I
>>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the
>>>>>> Statue of
>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>
>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>
>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
>> of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>
> "Between 1901 and 2018, average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10
> in), an average of 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) per year. This rate
> accelerated to 4.62 mm (0.182 in)/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate
> change due to human activities is the main cause."
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>

He's been told this for decades.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/30/24 6:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article
> <17c1a837bf6797c3$83382$1768716$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>,
> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2024 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when
>>>>>>> I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>
>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
>>> of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>>
>> "Between 1901 and 2018, average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10
>> in), an average of 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) per year. This rate
>> accelerated to 4.62 mm (0.182 in)/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate
>> change due to human activities is the main cause."
>
> And yet this sea level rise is apparent nowhere at any actual sea shore,
> which means in 121 years the rise (if any) is so small it's beyond the
> limits of human perception.
>
> Yeah, that's certainly something to hysterically trash our economy and
> radically alter our way of life over.
>
> And Miami sure as shit ain't underwater, is it? In 2022, the ocean on
> South Beach was at the same level it was in 2002.
>

Decades.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 11:59:14 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot the
>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck the
>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis Scott
>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite? So what
>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>
>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while the
>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>
>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>
>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a DC
>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly very
>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>
>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>> level rise
>>>>
>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when I
>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>
>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>
>> Liar.
>>
>
>Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>everything around us goes to shit.
>
>Everything's fine. It's perfectly normal to set new records every week

Cite your claim.

>Natural disasters that used to be unusual are regular occurrences.

Ditto.

>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:26:53 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

>On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot the
>>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck the
>>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite? So what
>>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while the
>>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a DC
>>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly very
>>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when I
>>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>
>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>
>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>> underwater by 2011,
>
>
>Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits. Methinks you're
>lying per usual.''

There tends to be very little searchable information from the 90's on
the Internet but they are certainly pushing a current narrative:

"Emilio Corrales, a project manager at consulting firm HDR, said his
team identified 28 project areas, including one on Big Coppitt Key,
where roads could be flooded with more than 6 inches of water during
king tides by 2025. King tides are the highest tides of the year, and
sea level rise is pushing them even higher.

Read more at:
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/environment/article255155012.html#storylink=cpy

>
>
> one would think that there would be *some* evidence
>> of a, ya know, sea level rise.

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:31:30 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
wrote:

>On 3/30/2024 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot the
>>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck the
>>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite? So what
>>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while the
>>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a DC
>>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly very
>>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when I
>>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>
>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>
>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
>> of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>
>"Between 1901 and 2018, average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10
>in), an average of 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) per year. This rate
>accelerated to 4.62 mm (0.182 in)/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate
>change due to human activities is the main cause."
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise

Wikipedia....
Laugh.

On 3/31/24 8:14 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/30/24 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>     "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
>>>>>>>>>> government
>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency
>>>>>>>>>> foot the
>>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the
>>>>>>>>>> Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite?
>>>>>>>>>> So what
>>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today
>>>>>>>>> while the
>>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to
>>>>>>> read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
>>>>>>> rebuilt.
>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I
>>>>>> was a DC
>>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
>>>>>> very
>>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and
>>>>>>> sea
>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea
>>>>>> level
>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me;
>>>>>> when I
>>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the
>>>>>> Statue of
>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>
>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>
>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
>> of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>>
>
> Well, genius, NOAA (you know, REAL experts) say you're full of shit.

It looks like we've got NOAA vs. don't-know-a.

>
>> Global sea level has been rising over the past century, and the rate
>> has increased in recent decades. In 2014, global sea level was  2.6
>> inches 67 mm above the 1993 average—the highest annual average in the
>> satellite record (1993-present). Sea level continues to rise at a rate
>> of  about one-eighth of an inch 3.2 mm per year.
>>
>> Higher sea levels mean that deadly and destructive storm surges push
>> farther inland than they once did, which also means more frequent
>> nuisance flooding. Disruptive and expensive, nuisance flooding is
>> estimated to be from 300 percent to 900 percent more frequent within
>> U.S. coastal communities than it was just 50 years ago.
>>
>> The two major causes of global sea level rise are thermal expansion
>> caused by warming of the ocean (since water expands as it warms) and
>> increased melting of land-based ice, such as glaciers and ice sheets.
>> The ocean is absorbing more than 90 percent of the increased
>> atmospheric heat associated with emissions from human activity.
>
> And THEY don't play at knowing what they're talking about like you do.
> You've been told this for decades.
>
>> With continued ocean and atmospheric warming, sea levels will likely
>> rise for many centuries at rates higher than that of the current
>> century.  In the United States, almost 40 percent of the population
>> lives in relatively high-population-density coastal areas, where sea
>> level plays a role in flooding, shoreline erosion, and hazards from
>> storms. Globally, eight of the world's 10 largest cities are near a
>> coast, according to the U.N. Atlas of the Oceans.
>
> And you've been told this for decades.
>

On 3/31/24 8:15 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
>>   trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>      "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> government
>>>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency
>>>>>>>>>>>> foot
>>>>>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity
>>>>>>>>>>>> to fuck
>>>>>>>>>>>> the taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
>>>>>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy",
>>>>>>>>>>>> amirite?
>>>>>>>>>>>> So what will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today
>>>>>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the
>>>>>>>>>>> company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript
>>>>>>>>> to read.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
>>>>>>>>> rebuilt.
>>>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I
>>>>>>>> was a
>>>>>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with
>>>>>>>> seemingly
>>>>>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost
>>>>>>>> control.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels
>>>>>>>>> and sea
>>>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no
>>>>>>>> sea level
>>>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from
>>>>>>>> me; when
>>>>>>>> I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in
>>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011);
>>>>>>>> Plymouth
>>>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the
>>>>>>>> Statue of
>>>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>>
>>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>>> underwater by 2011,
>>>
>>> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
>>
>> Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
>> of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
>> results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
>>
>> Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
>> whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
>> kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
>>
> You've been told this for decades.

Give him some credit, "I can't believe you had to use Google to know it
would get no hits" is pretty astute.

On 3/31/24 9:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:31:30 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2024 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot the
>>>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck the
>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite? So what
>>>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while the
>>>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a DC
>>>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly very
>>>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when I
>>>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>
>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
>>> of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>>
>> "Between 1901 and 2018, average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10
>> in), an average of 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) per year. This rate
>> accelerated to 4.62 mm (0.182 in)/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate
>> change due to human activities is the main cause."
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> Wikipedia....
> Laugh.

You're right, it would have far more credibility if it was
"Nobodipedia". Hint: you're an anonymous piece of dog shit.

In article <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
> > trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
> >>>>>>>>>>> government will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the
> >>>>>>>>>>> Baltimore bridge.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot
> >>>>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to
> >>>>>>>>>>> fuck the taxpayer.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis
> >>>>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy",
> >>>>>>>>>>> amirite? So what will its new name be?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while
> >>>>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the
> >>>>>>>>>> company/insurance.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to
> >>>>>>>> read.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridg
> >>>>>>>> e/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
> >>>>>>>> rebuilt. It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm
> >>>>>>>> sure the piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a
> >>>>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
> >>>>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and
> >>>>>>>> sea level rise
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea
> >>>>>>> level rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from
> >>>>>>> me; when I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was
> >>>>>>> in the same place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier
> >>>>>>> (despite AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011);
> >>>>>>> Plymouth Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of
> >>>>>>> the Statue of Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Liar.
> >>>
> >>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
> >>>> everything around us goes to shit.
> >>>
> >>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
> >>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
> >>> underwater by 2011,
> >>
> >> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
> >
> > Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
> > of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
> > results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
> >
> > Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
> > whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
> > kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
> >
> You've been told this for decades.

You're claiming I've been told for decades that Hutt couldn't find
anything about enviro-kooks pushing sea-level rise on Google?

Do tell...

(Your bullshit doesn't even make coherent sense anymore.)

On 3/31/2024 10:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:31:30 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2024 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the government
>>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot the
>>>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to fuck the
>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", amirite? So what
>>>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while the
>>>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to read.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be rebuilt.
>>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a DC
>>>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly very
>>>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and sea
>>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea level
>>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from me; when I
>>>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the same
>>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011); Plymouth
>>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the Statue of
>>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>
>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
>>> of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>>
>> "Between 1901 and 2018, average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10
>> in), an average of 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) per year. This rate
>> accelerated to 4.62 mm (0.182 in)/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate
>> change due to human activities is the main cause."
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> Wikipedia....
> Laugh.

I couldn't find a copy of the Trump Bible to consult.

On 3/31/24 4:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> government will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck the taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy",
>>>>>>>>>>>>> amirite? So what will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while
>>>>>>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the
>>>>>>>>>>>> company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to
>>>>>>>>>> read.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridg
>>>>>>>>>> e/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
>>>>>>>>>> rebuilt. It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm
>>>>>>>>>> sure the piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a
>>>>>>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
>>>>>>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and
>>>>>>>>>> sea level rise
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea
>>>>>>>>> level rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from
>>>>>>>>> me; when I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was
>>>>>>>>> in the same place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier
>>>>>>>>> (despite AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011);
>>>>>>>>> Plymouth Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of
>>>>>>>>> the Statue of Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>>>> underwater by 2011,
>>>>
>>>> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
>>>
>>> Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
>>> of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
>>> results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
>>>
>>> Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
>>> whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
>>> kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
>>>
>> You've been told this for decades.
>
> You're claiming I've been told for decades that Hutt couldn't find
> anything about enviro-kooks pushing sea-level rise on Google?
>
> Do tell...
>
> (Your bullshit doesn't even make coherent sense anymore.)
>

Nope, I claimed no such thing. You've been shown evidence for decades
that man made climate change would devastate the planet.

Well, now it is. And you still can't admit you were wrong, and it's
still happening.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/31/24 4:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> government will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck the taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy",
>>>>>>>>>>>>> amirite? So what will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while
>>>>>>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the
>>>>>>>>>>>> company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to
>>>>>>>>>> read.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridg
>>>>>>>>>> e/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
>>>>>>>>>> rebuilt. It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm
>>>>>>>>>> sure the piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a
>>>>>>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
>>>>>>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and
>>>>>>>>>> sea level rise
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea
>>>>>>>>> level rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from
>>>>>>>>> me; when I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was
>>>>>>>>> in the same place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier
>>>>>>>>> (despite AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011);
>>>>>>>>> Plymouth Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of
>>>>>>>>> the Statue of Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>>>> underwater by 2011,
>>>>
>>>> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
>>>
>>> Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
>>> of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
>>> results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
>>>
>>> Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
>>> whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
>>> kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
>>>
>> You've been told this for decades.
>
> You're claiming I've been told for decades that Hutt couldn't find
> anything about enviro-kooks pushing sea-level rise on Google?
>
> Do tell...
> >

Did tell. For decades.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/31/24 5:02 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/31/2024 10:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:31:30 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/2024 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>      "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> government
>>>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency
>>>>>>>>>>>> foot the
>>>>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to
>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck the
>>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy",
>>>>>>>>>>>> amirite? So what
>>>>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today
>>>>>>>>>>> while the
>>>>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript
>>>>>>>>> to read.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
>>>>>>>>> rebuilt.
>>>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I
>>>>>>>> was a DC
>>>>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with
>>>>>>>> seemingly very
>>>>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels
>>>>>>>>> and sea
>>>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no
>>>>>>>> sea level
>>>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from
>>>>>>>> me; when I
>>>>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the
>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011);
>>>>>>>> Plymouth
>>>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the
>>>>>>>> Statue of
>>>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>>
>>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>>> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some* evidence
>>>> of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>>>
>>> "Between 1901 and 2018, average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10
>>> in), an average of 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) per year. This rate
>>> accelerated to 4.62 mm (0.182 in)/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate
>>> change due to human activities is the main cause."
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>
>> Wikipedia....
>> Laugh.
>
> I couldn't find a copy of the Trump Bible to consult.
>
>

Did you catch the SNL cold open?

"Trump Bible... made with 100% bible."

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 4/1/2024 10:16 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/31/24 5:02 PM, moviePig wrote:
>> On 3/31/2024 10:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:31:30 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/30/2024 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>      "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701
>>>>>>>>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> government
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance
>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency foot the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Francis Scott
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy",
>>>>>>>>>>>>> amirite? So what
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today
>>>>>>>>>>>> while the
>>>>>>>>>>>> lawyers act to collect any money due from the
>>>>>>>>>>>> company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript
>>>>>>>>>> to read.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridge/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
>>>>>>>>>> rebuilt.
>>>>>>>>>> It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm sure the
>>>>>>>>>> piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I
>>>>>>>>> was a DC
>>>>>>>>> denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with
>>>>>>>>> seemingly very
>>>>>>>>> little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels
>>>>>>>>>> and sea
>>>>>>>>>> level rise
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no
>>>>>>>>> sea level
>>>>>>>>> rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from
>>>>>>>>> me; when I
>>>>>>>>> visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was in the
>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>> place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier (despite
>>>>>>>>> AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011);
>>>>>>>>> Plymouth
>>>>>>>>> Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of the
>>>>>>>>> Statue of
>>>>>>>>> Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>>>> underwater by 2011, one would think that there would be *some*
>>>>> evidence
>>>>> of a, ya know, sea level rise.
>>>>
>>>> "Between 1901 and 2018, average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10
>>>> in), an average of 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) per year. This rate
>>>> accelerated to 4.62 mm (0.182 in)/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate
>>>> change due to human activities is the main cause."
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>>
>>> Wikipedia....
>>> Laugh.
>>
>> I couldn't find a copy of the Trump Bible to consult.
>>
>>
>
> Did you catch the SNL cold open?
>
> "Trump Bible... made with 100% bible."

No. But now I will.

In article <uuefgr$2hcm5$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/31/24 4:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
> >>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

> >>>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
> >>>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
> >>>>> underwater by 2011,
> >>>>
> >>>> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
> >>>
> >>> Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
> >>> of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
> >>> results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
> >>>
> >>> Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
> >>> whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
> >>> kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
> >>>
> >> You've been told this for decades.
> >
> > You're claiming I've been told for decades that Hutt couldn't find
> > anything about enviro-kooks pushing sea-level rise on Google?
> >
> > Do tell...
> > >
>
> Did tell. For decades.

Well then it shouldn't be a problem for you to quote back an instance
where you told me 10 years ago about something that only occurred this
past week.

Put it here-->

In article <uuefg5$2hcm5$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/31/24 4:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
> >>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

> >>>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
> >>>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
> >>>>> underwater by 2011,
> >>>>
> >>>> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
> >>>
> >>> Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
> >>> of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
> >>> results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
> >>>
> >>> Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
> >>> whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
> >>> kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
> >>>
> >> You've been told this for decades.
> >
> > You're claiming I've been told for decades that Hutt couldn't find
> > anything about enviro-kooks pushing sea-level rise on Google?
> >
> > Do tell...
> >
> > (Your bullshit doesn't even make coherent sense anymore.)
> >
> Nope, I claimed no such thing. You've been shown evidence for decades
> that man made climate change would devastate the planet.

Hutt told me he couldn't find anything on Google to support the claim
that enviro-kooks have been predicting sea-level rise.

I responded that I can't believe he even needed to ask Google about one
of the basic claims of the Climate Cult.

You responded that I've "been told this for decades".

So prove it. Prove I've been told for decades that Google has no search
results of enviro-fanatics claiming sea levels will rise.

Betcha can't.