On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > George J. Dance wrote:
> > >
> > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > >
> > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > > decided to see what I could come up with.
> > >
> > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > >
> > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > >
> > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > >
> > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > Definitely due for an update.
> >
> > 🙂
> I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.

Lo7!! Perfect example of obsession by the Obsessos Dunce and sWill!!! You say your foe is feeble minded, old and senile but you take his words so seriously like they hold great power over you or it is that they strike some sore nerves or stoke some guilty conscience pangs. You say he's merely a simple "troll" and "comes with the territory," yet for some reason supposed superior "Usenet vets" so well verse with Usenet etiquette cannot follow the common wisdom and do what the supposed "troll" does. So I wonder who's the troll and what you all do cannot be so wrong since you superior "Usenet vets" are doing it...
But what do you expect from a Dunce that made a total farce of his boasted ethic?

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:20:16 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > > > >
> > > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
> > > > >
> > > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > > > >
> > > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > > > >
> > > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > > > Definitely due for an update.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.
> > Your food bill must be up 99%
> Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.
>
> Good food, low cost.
>
> How about your food bill, obsesso?
>
> 🙂

Idiot, I was talking to Dance and is whale's consumption.

Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:

> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:20:16 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> > > > George J. Dance wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>> > > > >
>> > > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
>> > > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
>> > > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
>> > > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> > > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
>> > > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> > > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
>> > > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
>> > > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> > > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> > > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
>> > > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
>> > > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
>> > > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
>> > > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
>> > > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
>> > > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
>> > > > Definitely due for an update.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.
>> > Your food bill must be up 99%
>> Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.
>>
>> Good food, low cost.
>>
>> How about your food bill, obsesso?
>>
>

> Idiot

Look who's talking, an obsessive and feeble-minded old fart.

🙂

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:20:11 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:20:16 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> >> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> >> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> > > > George J. Dance wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> >> > > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> >> > > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> >> > > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >> > > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> >> > > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >> > > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> >> > > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> >> > > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >> > > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >> > > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> >> > > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> >> > > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> >> > > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> >> > > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> >> > > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> >> > > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >> > > > Definitely due for an update.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.
> >> > Your food bill must be up 99%
> >> Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.
> >>
> >> Good food, low cost.
> >>
> >> How about your food bill, obsesso?
> >>
> >
> > Idiot
>
> Look who's talking, an obsessive and feeble-minded old fart.
>
> 🙂

Dockery, I have it all over you. You remain a failure, as does Dance Pants, as does Jail-bird, as does the thing called Jordy

Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:

> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:20:11 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
>> Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>>
>> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:20:16 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
>> >> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
>> >> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> >> > > > George J. Dance wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
>> >> > > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
>> >> > > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
>> >> > > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> >> > > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
>> >> > > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> >> > > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
>> >> > > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
>> >> > > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> >> > > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> >> > > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
>> >> > > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
>> >> > > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
>> >> > > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
>> >> > > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
>> >> > > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
>> >> > > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
>> >> > > > Definitely due for an update.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.
>> >> > Your food bill must be up 99%
>> >> Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.
>> >>
>> >> Good food, low cost.
>> >>
>> >> How about your food bill, obsesso?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Idiot
>>
>> Look who's talking, an obsessive and feeble-minded old fart.
>>
>> 🙂

> Dockery, I have it all over you

Keep telling yourself that while you obsess over me every day, Senetto.

You're just a feeble-minded old fart, a gasbag.

And so it goes.

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:40:12 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:20:11 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> >> Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:20:16 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> >> >> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> >> >> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> >> > > > George J. Dance wrote:
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> >> >> > > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> >> >> > > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> >> >> > > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >> >> > > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> >> >> > > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >> >> > > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> >> >> > > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> >> >> > > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >> >> > > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >> >> > > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> >> >> > > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> >> >> > > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> >> >> > > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> >> >> > > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> >> >> > > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> >> >> > > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >> >> > > > Definitely due for an update.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%..
> >> >> > Your food bill must be up 99%
> >> >> Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.
> >> >>
> >> >> Good food, low cost.
> >> >>
> >> >> How about your food bill, obsesso?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Idiot
> >>
> >> Look who's talking, an obsessive and feeble-minded old fart.
> >>
> >> 🙂
>
>
> > Dockery, I have it all over you
> Keep telling yourself that while you obsess over me every day, Senetto.
>
> You're just a feeble-minded old fart, a gasbag.
>
> And so it goes.

Wow, you're fired up today,,,,,whiskey in your oatmeal?

Try doing some wash today, piggy.

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:44:35 PM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:40:12 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> > Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:20:11 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> > >> Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:20:16 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> > >> >> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > >> >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> > >> >> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> >> > > > George J. Dance wrote:
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > >> >> > > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > >> >> > > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > >> >> > > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > >> >> > > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > >> >> > > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > >> >> > > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > >> >> > > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > >> >> > > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > >> >> > > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > >> >> > > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > >> >> > > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > >> >> > > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > >> >> > > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > >> >> > > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > >> >> > > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > >> >> > > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > >> >> > > > Definitely due for an update.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.
> > >> >> > Your food bill must be up 99%
> > >> >> Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Good food, low cost.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> How about your food bill, obsesso?
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Idiot
> > >>
> > >> Look who's talking, an obsessive and feeble-minded old fart.
> > >>
> > >> 🙂
> >
> >
> > > Dockery, I have it all over you
> > Keep telling yourself that while you obsess over me every day, Senetto.
> >
> > You're just a feeble-minded old fart, a gasbag.
> >
> > And so it goes.
> Wow, you're fired up today,,,,,

And you're not?

🙂

George J. Dance wrote:
>
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>
> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.
>
> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,
>
> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>
> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>
> I think these figures speak for themselves.

Again, it's probably spiking today, since Jim Senetto posts about nothing but his obsession with me, my life and family.

And so it goes.

George J. Dance wrote:
>
> (cleaned-up copy)

> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed).

> For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> as a percentage of the former to calculate
> the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.

Again, I think this calls out for an update, since Jim Senetto is more unhinged than ever before.

HTH and HAND.

George Dance wrote:
> Will Dockery wrote:
>> George J. Dance wrote:
>
>>> > > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
>>> > > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
>>> > > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
>>> > > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>>> > > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
>>> > > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>>> > > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
>>> > > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
>>> > > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>>> > > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>>> > > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
>>> > > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
>>> > > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
>>> > > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
>>> > > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
>>> > > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
>>> > > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>
> > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
>
> > Definitely due for an update.
>
> I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.

No doubt even higher these days.

George J. Dance wrote:

>
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

Looks like Senetto has decided to obsess over you for a while now, George.

🙂

George J. Dance wrote:

>
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

As the numbers rise, to this day.

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 2:05:13 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> George J. Dance wrote:
>
> >
> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>
> > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > decided to see what I could come up with.
>
> > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > obsession. Using the Google feed,
>
> > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>
> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>
> > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> As the numbers rise, to this day.

Another sWill Douchery misrepresentation-- JIm posted once today that I see, you ilcounterate idiot!
Lo7z. Look who's obsessing himself-- the Duckery LAMe Index is always maxed out- 52 weeks a year!
What's the matter Willy? poor Willy, no one payin' any attention to his spam scat slingin' (I'm really beginnin' to think you're really into that)
BTW: where was that great thing you claimed to have over at RAP-- it's a goddamned ghost town over there-- no views :(
Soon, AAPC will be like RAP and AAP and you guys will have to find a new captive audience to spam.
But then it may be the end of the line for you Usenet "real poets," along with Usenet poetry...

Ash Wurthing wrote:

> On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 2:05:13 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> George J. Dance wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>>
>> > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
>> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
>> > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
>> > decided to see what I could come up with.
>>
>> > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
>> > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> > obsession. Using the Google feed,
>>
>> > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
>> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
>> > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
>> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>>
>> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
>> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
>> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
>> > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
>> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
>> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>>
>> > I think these figures speak for themselves.
>> As the numbers rise, to this day.

>
> Lo7z. Look who's obsessing himself

Your pal Jim Senetto, right.

🙂

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:44:35 PM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq.. wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:40:12 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> > Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:20:11 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> > >> Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:20:16 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> > >> >> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > >> >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> > >> >> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> >> > > > George J. Dance wrote:
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > >> >> > > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > >> >> > > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > >> >> > > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > >> >> > > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > >> >> > > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > >> >> > > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > >> >> > > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > >> >> > > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > >> >> > > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > >> >> > > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > >> >> > > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > >> >> > > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > >> >> > > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > >> >> > > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > >> >> > > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > >> >> > > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > >> >> > > > Definitely due for an update.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.
> > >> >> > Your food bill must be up 99%
> > >> >> Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Good food, low cost.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> How about your food bill, obsesso?
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Idiot
> > >>
> > >> Look who's talking, an obsessive and feeble-minded old fart.
> > >>
> > >> 🙂
> >
> >
> > > Dockery, I have it all over you
> > Keep telling yourself that while you obsess over me every day, Senetto.
> >
> > You're just a feeble-minded old fart, a gasbag.
> >
> > And so it goes.
> Wow, you're fired up today,,,,,

Look who's talking, Senetto, the feeble minded obsesso.

🙂

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 10:10:10 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 2:05:13 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> George J. Dance wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> >>
> >> > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> >> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> >> > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> >> > decided to see what I could come up with.
> >>
> >> > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> >> > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >> > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >>
> >> > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> >> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> >> > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >> > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >> > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> >> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >>
> >> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> >> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> >> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> >> > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> >> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> >> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >>
> >> > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >> As the numbers rise, to this day.
>
> >
> > Lo7z. Look who's obsessing himself
> Your pal Jim Senetto, right.

And you too-- see your posts in this thread-- you constantly repeating "feeble minded" and other mindless one liners like some taunting child makes you look obsessive too.
And makes people wonder-- if Dockery is such a great comix folk poet performer, why is he spending so much time on AAPC correcting the record, no fans to be seen here or on RAP and apparently no activity on social media to keep hm busy.

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 1:40:47 AM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 10:10:10 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> > Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 2:05:13 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> George J. Dance wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > >>
> > >> > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > >> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > >> > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > >> > decided to see what I could come up with.
> > >>
> > >> > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > >> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > >> > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > >> > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > >>
> > >> > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > >> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > >> > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > >> > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > >> > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > >> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > >>
> > >> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > >> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > >> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > >> > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > >> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > >> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > >>
> > >> > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > >> As the numbers rise, to this day.
> >
> > >
> > > Lo7z. Look who's obsessing himself
> > Your pal Jim Senetto, right.
> And you too-- see your posts in this thread-- you constantly repeating "feeble minded"

That's my observation, yes.

On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
>
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>
> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.
>
> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,
>
> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>
> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>
> I think these figures speak for themselves.

The numbers must be going through the roof this morning.

🙂

On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 7:55:58 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
> >
> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> >
> > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > decided to see what I could come up with.
> >
> > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >
> > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

Suckery sure loves when he crew arm chairs like psychiatrists, too bad they can't help him with his N.P.D.

> >
> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >
> > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> The numbers must be going through the roof this morning.

Don't fear, you know you quickly will leave him in the dust with your Dockery LAMe spam index-- Hell, you blow the rest of the group combined away. You'll have all the top threads but no readers, no fans, just rotten tomatoes thrown at you :(

Ash Wurthing wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 7:55:58 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
>> >
>> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>> >
>> > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
>> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
>> > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
>> > decided to see what I could come up with.
>> >
>> > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
>> > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> > obsession. Using the Google feed,
>> >
>> > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
>> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
>> > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
>> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Suckery sure loves

Childish name-calling from Ash noted again.

Grow up, little man.

🙂

>> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
>> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
>> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
>> > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
>> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
>> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>> >
>> > I think these figures speak for themselves.
>> The numbers must be going through the roof this morning.

> Don't fear

Not at all, I'm laughing at your boy Senetto and his latest meltdown.

HTH and HAND.

George J. Dance wrote:
> On 2022-09-16 6:23 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 5:17:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-09-16 4:15 a.m., Spam-I-Am wrote:
> >>
> >>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week.”
> >>>
> >>> How many Jim Senetto’s are there now?
> >> Depends on what means by the term "Jim Senetto". If we use that as a
> >> general term for those too stupid to know, or care, what an apostrophe
> >> means, then I'd say there are now four of you.
> >
> > True, apostrophes don't matter.
> >
>
> Of course they matter. At minimum they serve a gatekeeper role: they
> separate the yobs (who don't understand them) from the snobs (who at
> least understand the rules of how to use them).
>
> You just used an apostrophe, "don't". You understand why; it's a
> contraction, and the apostrophe means you left out some letters in one
> word to combine it with another one. Right?
>
> I remember Stuart Leichter explaining that's exactly what the possessive
> form "'s" does (or at least did, originally). Think of it that way and
> it's much harder to get wrong.

Again, well put, George.

On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 9:15:10 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> Ash Wurthing wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 7:55:58 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> >> >
> >> > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> >> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> >> > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> >> > decided to see what I could come up with.
> >> >
> >> > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> >> > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >> > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >> >
> >> > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> >> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> >> > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >> > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >> > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> >> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>
> > Suckery sure loves
> Childish name-calling from Ash noted again.
>
> Grow up, little man.
>
> 🙂
> >> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> >> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> >> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> >> > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> >> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> >> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >> >
> >> > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >> The numbers must be going through the roof this morning.
>
> > Don't fear
> Not at all, I'm laughing at your boy Senetto and his latest meltdown.

So why are you, as you say, "whining" about it?
#WillDockery says he's here for poetry-- but it seems that he more interested in things like laughing about people being provoke into anger by him and his buddies spammin' and trollin', like Dance's poem about jism and troll threads about "sister fisting"...

On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 6:55:53 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 9:15:10 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> > Ash Wurthing wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 7:55:58 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > >> >
> > >> > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > >> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > >> > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > >> > decided to see what I could come up with.
> > >> >
> > >> > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > >> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > >> > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > >> > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > >> >
> > >> > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > >> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > >> > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > >> > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > >> > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > >> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >
> > > Suckery sure loves
> > Childish name-calling from Ash noted again.
> >
> > Grow up, little man.
> >
> > 🙂
> > >> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > >> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > >> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > >> > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > >> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > >> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > >> >
> > >> > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > >> The numbers must be going through the roof this morning.
> >
> > > Don't fear
> > Not at all, I'm laughing at your boy Senetto and his latest meltdown.
> So why are you, as you say, "whining

You seem confused again, Ash.

George J. Dance wrote:
>
> (cleaned-up copy)
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
> Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed).
>
> For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> as a percentage of the former to calculate
> the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>
> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.

And the numbers add up, to the present day.

🙂

On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 10:42:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> George J. Dance wrote:
> >
> > (cleaned-up copy)
> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> > However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> > statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
> > Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> > quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> > credible evidence of
> > obsession. Using the Google feed).
> >
> > For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> > as a percentage of the former to calculate
> > the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> > (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >
> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.
>
> And the numbers add up, to the present day.

Gee whiz, some things never change here... sadly enough...