On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> > wrote:
> > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> > 14, 2022
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> > been a
> > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> > "obvious" isn't
> > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> > evidence, I
> > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> > simply
> > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> > OPs made
> > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> > 7-day period
> > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> > up for
> > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> > of which
> > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> > Index of
> > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> > subject's OPs
> > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> > in posts
> > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> > triple. Which
> > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> > >>>>> exists -
> > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> > aapc; and
> > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> > meaning
> > >>>>> he never saw it.
> > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> > behind his back.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> > >> So what?
> > >>
> > >> You read and replied to the post.
> > >
> > >
> > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> > nothing about.
> > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> > one usenet group.
> >
> > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> >
> > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> > choice.
> > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> > >
> > > I was wrong
> > And you still are, it seems.
> >
> > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> > joint..
> > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> > posts in question.
> >
> > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> > >
> > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> Observation is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
>
> And so it goes.

Observation ingredients?

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >
> > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> > > 14, 2022
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> > > been a
> > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> > > "obvious" isn't
> > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> > > evidence, I
> > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> > > simply
> > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> > > OPs made
> > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> > > 7-day period
> > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> > > up for
> > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> > > of which
> > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> > > Index of
> > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> > > subject's OPs
> > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> > > in posts
> > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> > > triple. Which
> > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> > > >>>>> exists -
> > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> > > aapc; and
> > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> > > meaning
> > > >>>>> he never saw it.
> > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> > > behind his back.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> > > >> So what?
> > > >>
> > > >> You read and replied to the post.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> > > nothing about.
> > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> > > one usenet group.
> > >
> > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> > >
> > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> > > choice.
> > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> > > >
> > > > I was wrong
> > > And you still are, it seems.
> > >
> > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> > > joint..
> > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> > > posts in question.
> > >
> > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> > > >
> > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> > And so it goes.
>
> Observation ingredients?

Autocorrect typo corrected.

Thanks for the heads up, Corey.

🙂

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:42:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> > > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> > > > 14, 2022
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> > > > been a
> > > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> > > > "obvious" isn't
> > > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> > > > evidence, I
> > > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> > > > simply
> > > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> > > > OPs made
> > > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> > > > 7-day period
> > > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> > > > up for
> > > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> > > > of which
> > > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> > > > Index of
> > > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> > > > subject's OPs
> > > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> > > > in posts
> > > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> > > > triple. Which
> > > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> > > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> > > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> > > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> > > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> > > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> > > > >>>>> exists -
> > > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> > > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> > > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> > > > aapc; and
> > > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> > > > meaning
> > > > >>>>> he never saw it.
> > > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> > > > behind his back.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> > > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> > > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> > > > >> So what?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> You read and replied to the post.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> > > > nothing about.
> > > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> > > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> > > > one usenet group.
> > > >
> > > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> > > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> > > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> > > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> > > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> > > >
> > > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> > > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> > > > choice.
> > > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was wrong
> > > > And you still are, it seems.
> > > >
> > > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> > > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> > > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> > > > joint..
> > > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> > > > posts in question.
> > > >
> > > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> > > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> > > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> > > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> > > > >
> > > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> > > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> > > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> > > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > And so it goes.
> >
> > Observation ingredients?
> Autocorrect typo corrected.
>
> Thanks for the heads up, Corey.
>
> 🙂

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:46:01 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:42:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> > > > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > > > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> > > > > 14, 2022
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> > > > > been a
> > > > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> > > > > "obvious" isn't
> > > > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> > > > > evidence, I
> > > > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > > > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> > > > > simply
> > > > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > > > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> > > > > OPs made
> > > > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> > > > > 7-day period
> > > > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > > > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > > > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> > > > > up for
> > > > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> > > > > of which
> > > > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> > > > > Index of
> > > > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> > > > > subject's OPs
> > > > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> > > > > in posts
> > > > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> > > > > triple. Which
> > > > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> > > > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> > > > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> > > > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> > > > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> > > > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> > > > > >>>>> exists -
> > > > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> > > > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> > > > > aapc; and
> > > > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> > > > > meaning
> > > > > >>>>> he never saw it.
> > > > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> > > > > behind his back.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> > > > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> > > > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> > > > > >> So what?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> You read and replied to the post.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> > > > > nothing about.
> > > > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> > > > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> > > > > one usenet group.
> > > > >
> > > > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> > > > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> > > > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> > > > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> > > > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> > > > >
> > > > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> > > > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> > > > > choice.
> > > > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was wrong
> > > > > And you still are, it seems.
> > > > >
> > > > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> > > > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> > > > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> > > > > joint..
> > > > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> > > > > posts in question.
> > > > >
> > > > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> > > > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> > > > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> > > > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> > > > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> > > > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> > > > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > And so it goes.
> > >
> > > Observation ingredients?
> > Autocorrect typo corrected.
> >
> > Thanks for the heads up, Corey.
> >
>
> No worries, Violet.

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:05:43 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:46:01 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:42:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> > > > > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > > > > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> > > > > > 14, 2022
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> > > > > > been a
> > > > > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> > > > > > "obvious" isn't
> > > > > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> > > > > > evidence, I
> > > > > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > > > > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> > > > > > simply
> > > > > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > > > > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> > > > > > OPs made
> > > > > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> > > > > > 7-day period
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > > > > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > > > > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> > > > > > up for
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> > > > > > of which
> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> > > > > > Index of
> > > > > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> > > > > > subject's OPs
> > > > > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> > > > > > in posts
> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> > > > > > triple. Which
> > > > > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> > > > > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> > > > > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> > > > > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> > > > > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> > > > > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> > > > > > >>>>> exists -
> > > > > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> > > > > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> > > > > > aapc; and
> > > > > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> > > > > > meaning
> > > > > > >>>>> he never saw it.
> > > > > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> > > > > > behind his back.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> > > > > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> > > > > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> > > > > > >> So what?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> You read and replied to the post.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> > > > > > nothing about.
> > > > > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> > > > > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> > > > > > one usenet group.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> > > > > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> > > > > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> > > > > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> > > > > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> > > > > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> > > > > > choice.
> > > > > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was wrong
> > > > > > And you still are, it seems.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> > > > > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> > > > > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> > > > > > joint..
> > > > > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> > > > > > posts in question.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> > > > > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> > > > > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> > > > > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> > > > > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> > > > > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> > > > > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > > And so it goes.
> > > >
> > > > Observation ingredients?
> > > Autocorrect typo corrected.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the heads up, Corey.
> > >
> >
> > No worries, Violet.
> That's cool, Pastor C.
>
> HTH and HAND.

Spam-I-Am wrote:

> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:05:43 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:46:01 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
>> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:42:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
>> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> > > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> > > > > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> > > > > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
>> > > > > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
>> > > > > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
>> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
>> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
>> > > > > > 14, 2022
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
>> > > > > > been a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
>> > > > > > "obvious" isn't
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
>> > > > > > evidence, I
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
>> > > > > > simply
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
>> > > > > > OPs made
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
>> > > > > > 7-day period
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
>> > > > > > up for
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
>> > > > > > of which
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
>> > > > > > Index of
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
>> > > > > > subject's OPs
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
>> > > > > > in posts
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
>> > > > > > triple. Which
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
>> > > > > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
>> > > > > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
>> > > > > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
>> > > > > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
>> > > > > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
>> > > > > > >>>>> exists -
>> > > > > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
>> > > > > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
>> > > > > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
>> > > > > > aapc; and
>> > > > > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
>> > > > > > meaning
>> > > > > > >>>>> he never saw it.
>> > > > > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
>> > > > > > behind his back.
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
>> > > > > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
>> > > > > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
>> > > > > > >> So what?
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> You read and replied to the post.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
>> > > > > > nothing about.
>> > > > > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
>> > > > > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
>> > > > > > one usenet group.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
>> > > > > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
>> > > > > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
>> > > > > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
>> > > > > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
>> > > > > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
>> > > > > > choice.
>> > > > > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I was wrong
>> > > > > > And you still are, it seems.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
>> > > > > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
>> > > > > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
>> > > > > > joint..
>> > > > > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
>> > > > > > posts in question.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
>> > > > > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
>> > > > > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
>> > > > > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
>> > > > > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
>> > > > > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
>> > > > > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
>> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > > > > And so it goes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Observation ingredients?
>> > > Autocorrect typo corrected.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for the heads up, Corey.
>> > >
>> >
>> > No worries, Violet.
>> That's cool, Pastor C.
>>
>> HTH and HAND.

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:37:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> Spam-I-Am wrote:
>
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:05:43 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:46:01 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> >> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:42:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> >> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> > > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> > > > > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> >> > > > > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> >> > > > > > 14, 2022
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> >> > > > > > been a
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> >> > > > > > "obvious" isn't
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> >> > > > > > evidence, I
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> >> > > > > > simply
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> >> > > > > > OPs made
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> >> > > > > > 7-day period
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> >> > > > > > up for
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> >> > > > > > of which
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> >> > > > > > Index of
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> >> > > > > > subject's OPs
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> >> > > > > > in posts
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> >> > > > > > triple. Which
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> >> > > > > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> >> > > > > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> >> > > > > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> >> > > > > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> >> > > > > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> >> > > > > > >>>>> exists -
> >> > > > > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> >> > > > > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> >> > > > > > aapc; and
> >> > > > > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> >> > > > > > meaning
> >> > > > > > >>>>> he never saw it.
> >> > > > > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> >> > > > > > behind his back.
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> >> > > > > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> >> > > > > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> >> > > > > > >> So what?
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> You read and replied to the post.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> >> > > > > > nothing about.
> >> > > > > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> >> > > > > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> >> > > > > > one usenet group.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> >> > > > > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> >> > > > > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> >> > > > > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> >> > > > > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> >> > > > > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> >> > > > > > choice.
> >> > > > > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I was wrong
> >> > > > > > And you still are, it seems.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> >> > > > > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> >> > > > > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> >> > > > > > joint..
> >> > > > > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> >> > > > > > posts in question.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> >> > > > > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> >> > > > > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> >> > > > > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> >> > > > > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> >> > > > > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> >> > > > > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
> >> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> > > > > And so it goes.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Observation ingredients?
> >> > > Autocorrect typo corrected.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks for the heads up, Corey.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > No worries, Violet.
> >> That's cool, Pastor C.
> >>
> >> HTH and HAND.
>
> > Violet
> Troll much, Corey?
>
> 🙂

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:40:10 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:37:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > Spam-I-Am wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:05:43 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:46:01 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > >> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:42:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > >> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> > > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george....@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> > > > > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> > >> > > > > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> > >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> > >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> > >> > > > > > 14, 2022
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> > >> > > > > > been a
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> > >> > > > > > "obvious" isn't
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> > >> > > > > > evidence, I
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> > >> > > > > > simply
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> > >> > > > > > OPs made
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> > >> > > > > > 7-day period
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> > >> > > > > > up for
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> > >> > > > > > of which
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> > >> > > > > > Index of
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> > >> > > > > > subject's OPs
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> > >> > > > > > in posts
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> > >> > > > > > triple. Which
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> > >> > > > > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> > >> > > > > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> > >> > > > > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> > >> > > > > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> > >> > > > > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> exists -
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> > >> > > > > > aapc; and
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> > >> > > > > > meaning
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> he never saw it.
> > >> > > > > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> > >> > > > > > behind his back.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> > >> > > > > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> > >> > > > > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> > >> > > > > > >> So what?
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> You read and replied to the post.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> > >> > > > > > nothing about.
> > >> > > > > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> > >> > > > > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> > >> > > > > > one usenet group.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> > >> > > > > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it.. You didn't
> > >> > > > > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> > >> > > > > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> > >> > > > > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> > >> > > > > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> > >> > > > > > choice.
> > >> > > > > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I was wrong
> > >> > > > > > And you still are, it seems.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> > >> > > > > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> > >> > > > > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> > >> > > > > > joint..
> > >> > > > > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> > >> > > > > > posts in question.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> > >> > > > > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> > >> > > > > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> > >> > > > > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> > >> > > > > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> > >> > > > > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> > >> > > > > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
> > >> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >> > > > > And so it goes.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Observation ingredients?
> > >> > > Autocorrect typo corrected.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks for the heads up, Corey.
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > No worries, Violet.
> > >> That's cool, Pastor C.
> > >>
> > >> HTH and HAND.
> >
> > > Violet
> > Troll much, Corey?
> >
>
> Never. That’s just your violet fantasy.

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:45:05 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:40:10 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:37:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:05:43 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:46:01 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > > >> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:42:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > > >> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> > > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george....@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> > > >> > > > > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> > > >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> > > >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> > > >> > > > > > 14, 2022
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> > > >> > > > > > been a
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> > > >> > > > > > "obvious" isn't
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> > > >> > > > > > evidence, I
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> > > >> > > > > > simply
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> > > >> > > > > > OPs made
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> > > >> > > > > > 7-day period
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> > > >> > > > > > up for
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> > > >> > > > > > of which
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> > > >> > > > > > Index of
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> > > >> > > > > > subject's OPs
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> > > >> > > > > > in posts
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> > > >> > > > > > triple. Which
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> > > >> > > > > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> > > >> > > > > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> > > >> > > > > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> > > >> > > > > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> > > >> > > > > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> exists -
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> > > >> > > > > > aapc; and
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> > > >> > > > > > meaning
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> he never saw it.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> > > >> > > > > > behind his back.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> > > >> > > > > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> > > >> > > > > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post..
> > > >> > > > > > >> So what?
> > > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > >> You read and replied to the post.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> > > >> > > > > > nothing about.
> > > >> > > > > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> > > >> > > > > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> > > >> > > > > > one usenet group.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> > > >> > > > > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> > > >> > > > > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> > > >> > > > > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> > > >> > > > > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> > > >> > > > > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> > > >> > > > > > choice.
> > > >> > > > > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > I was wrong
> > > >> > > > > > And you still are, it seems.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> > > >> > > > > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> > > >> > > > > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> > > >> > > > > > joint..
> > > >> > > > > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> > > >> > > > > > posts in question.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> > > >> > > > > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> > > >> > > > > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> > > >> > > > > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> > > >> > > > > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> > > >> > > > > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> > > >> > > > > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
> > > >> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > >> > > > > And so it goes.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Observation ingredients?
> > > >> > > Autocorrect typo corrected.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks for the heads up, Corey.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > No worries, Violet.
> > > >> That's cool, Pastor C.
> > > >>
> > > >> HTH and HAND.
> > >
> > > > Violet
> > > Troll much, Corey?
> > >
> >
> > Never. That’s just your violet fantasy.
> I didn't expect you to admit it, Corey.
>
> 🙂

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> 14, 2022
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> been a
> >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> "obvious" isn't
> >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> evidence, I
> >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> simply
> >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> OPs made
> >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> 7-day period
> >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> up for
> >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> of which
> >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> Index of
> >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> subject's OPs
> >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> in posts
> >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> triple. Which
> >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> >>>>> exists -
> >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> aapc; and
> >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> meaning
> >>>>> he never saw it.
> >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> behind his back.
> >>>>
> >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> >>>>
> >>>> HTH and HAND.
> >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> >> So what?
> >>
> >> You read and replied to the post.
> >
> >
> > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> nothing about.
> Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> one usenet group.
>
> I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> cleaned-up edit of the first one.
>
> IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> choice.
> > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> >
> > I was wrong
> And you still are, it seems.
>
> No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> joint..
> At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> posts in question.
>
> As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> > Dunce is a scumbag.
> >
> > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.

Like I said earlier, Senetto's feeble little mind is obviously overwhelmed by his obsession.

HTH and HAND.

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:45:05 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:40:10 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:37:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:05:43 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:46:01 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > > >> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:42:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> > > >> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> > > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george....@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> > > >> > > > > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> > > >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> > > >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> > > >> > > > > > 14, 2022
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> > > >> > > > > > been a
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> > > >> > > > > > "obvious" isn't
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> > > >> > > > > > evidence, I
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> > > >> > > > > > simply
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> > > >> > > > > > OPs made
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> > > >> > > > > > 7-day period
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> > > >> > > > > > up for
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> > > >> > > > > > of which
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> > > >> > > > > > Index of
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> > > >> > > > > > subject's OPs
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> > > >> > > > > > in posts
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> > > >> > > > > > triple. Which
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> > > >> > > > > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> > > >> > > > > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> > > >> > > > > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> > > >> > > > > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> > > >> > > > > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> exists -
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> > > >> > > > > > aapc; and
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> > > >> > > > > > meaning
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> he never saw it.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> > > >> > > > > > behind his back.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> > > >> > > > > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> > > >> > > > > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post..
> > > >> > > > > > >> So what?
> > > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > >> You read and replied to the post.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> > > >> > > > > > nothing about.
> > > >> > > > > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> > > >> > > > > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> > > >> > > > > > one usenet group.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> > > >> > > > > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> > > >> > > > > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> > > >> > > > > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> > > >> > > > > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> > > >> > > > > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> > > >> > > > > > choice.
> > > >> > > > > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > I was wrong
> > > >> > > > > > And you still are, it seems.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> > > >> > > > > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> > > >> > > > > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> > > >> > > > > > joint..
> > > >> > > > > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> > > >> > > > > > posts in question.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> > > >> > > > > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> > > >> > > > > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> > > >> > > > > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> > > >> > > > > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> > > >> > > > > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> > > >> > > > > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
> > > >> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > >> > > > > And so it goes.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Observation ingredients?
> > > >> > > Autocorrect typo corrected.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks for the heads up, Corey.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > No worries, Violet.
> > > >> That's cool, Pastor C.
> > > >>
> > > >> HTH and HAND.
> > >
> > > > Violet
> > > Troll much, Corey?
> > >
> >
> > Never. That’s just your violet fantasy.
> I didn't expect you to admit it, Corey.
>
>
I didn't expect you to post anything else, Donkey.

Will Dockery wrote:

> On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 5:17:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-09-16 4:15 a.m., Spam-I-Am wrote:
>>
>> > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week.”
>> >
>> > How many Jim Senetto’s are there now?
>> Depends on what means by the term "Jim Senetto". If we use that as a
>> general term for those too stupid to know, or care, what an apostrophe
>> means, then I'd say there are now four of you.

> True, apostrophes don't matter.

For some, it seems not...!

On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 5:11:05 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>
> (cleaned-up copy)
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
> Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed).
>
> For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> as a percentage of the former to calculate
> the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>
> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.

And the numbers continue to rise.

On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 8:11:38 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 5:11:05 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >
> > (cleaned-up copy)
> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> > However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> > statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
> > Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> > quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> > credible evidence of
> > obsession. Using the Google feed).
> >
> > For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> > as a percentage of the former to calculate
> > the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> > (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >
> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.
>
> And the numbers continue to rise.

Thread marked spam.

Spam-I-Am wrote:

> On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 8:11:38 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 5:11:05 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> >
>> > (cleaned-up copy)
>> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>> > It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
>> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
>> > However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
>> > statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
>> > Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
>> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
>> > quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
>> > credible evidence of
>> > obsession. Using the Google feed).
>> >
>> > For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
>> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
>> > as a percentage of the former to calculate
>> > the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
>> > (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
>> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>> >
>> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
>> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
>> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
>> > rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
>> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
>> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>> > Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.
>>
>> And the numbers continue to rise.

> Thread marked spam.

Of course, skip and ignore if the thread doesn't interest you.

HTH and HAND.

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> 14, 2022
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> been a
> >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> "obvious" isn't
> >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> evidence, I
> >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> simply
> >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> OPs made
> >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> 7-day period
> >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> up for
> >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> of which
> >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> Index of
> >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> subject's OPs
> >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> in posts
> >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> triple. Which
> >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> >>>>> exists -
> >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> aapc; and
> >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> meaning
> >>>>> he never saw it.
> >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> behind his back.
> >>>>
> >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> >>>>
> >>>> HTH and HAND.
> >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> >> So what?
> >>
> >> You read and replied to the post.
> >
> >
> > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> nothing about.
> Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> one usenet group.

You're the one who isn't understanding, George (perhaps intentionally).

When you cross-post to different groups, Jim is only able to address your comments in the group/s he is a member of.

If you cross-post to RAP and Jim is not a member of RAP, your post (and any accusations it contains) will go unaddressed.

Both you and your Donkey have stressed what you believe to be the importance of "setting the record straight." How can Jim set the record straight in groups that he isn't a member of, and is therefore unaware that any accusations had been posted?

The alleged accusation that you have been posting behind Jim's back is 100% correct.

It's a Georgie Porgie tactic: attack in several groups. When those you've attacked confront you in one of the groups, you'll still remain unchallenged in the others.

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
>> blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
>> >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
>> wrote:
>> >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
>> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
>> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
>> 14, 2022
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
>> been a
>> >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
>> "obvious" isn't
>> >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
>> evidence, I
>> >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
>> simply
>> >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
>> OPs made
>> >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
>> 7-day period
>> >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
>> up for
>> >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
>> of which
>> >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
>> Index of
>> >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
>> subject's OPs
>> >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
>> in posts
>> >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
>> triple. Which
>> >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
>> concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
>> more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
>> he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
>> than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
>> you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
>> >>>>> exists -
>> >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
>> >>>>> - in light of the fact that
>> >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
>> aapc; and
>> >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
>> meaning
>> >>>>> he never saw it.
>> >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
>> behind his back.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
>> slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> HTH and HAND.
>> >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
>> >> So what?
>> >>
>> >> You read and replied to the post.
>> >
>> >
>> > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
>> nothing about.
>> Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
>> works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
>> one usenet group.

> You're the one who isn't understanding, George (perhaps intentionally).

> When you cross-post to different groups, Jim is only able to address your comments in the group/s he is a member of.

> If you cross-post to RAP and Jim is not a member of RAP, your post (and any accusations it contains) will go unaddressed.

> Both you and your Donkey have stressed what you believe to be the importance of "setting the record straight." How can Jim set the record straight in groups that he isn't a member of, and is therefore unaware that any accusations had been posted?

> The alleged accusation that you have been posting behind Jim's back is 100% correct.

> It's a Georgie Porgie tactic: attack in several groups. When those you've attacked confront you in one of the groups, you'll still remain unchallenged in the others.

Actually, cross posting the truth /is/ setting the record straight.

HTH and HAND.

George J. Dance wrote:

> On 2022-09-16 6:10 p.m., Spam-I-Am wrote:
>> On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 5:17:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>
>>> Depends on what means by the term "Jim Senetto".
>>
>> There’s something wrong with that sentence. Do you know what it is?

> Once again, that depends on whom it's wrong to (or for).

> What's wrong for me is that it omitted a word, "one". Though on
> reflection it would have been better in the passive tense; so in that
> sense, it would have still been wrong as there was a better way to put it.

> Whereas for you, what was wrong with it was that it led to the next
> sentence, the one you post-edited out:

> "If we use that [ie, "Jim Senetto"] as a
> general term for those too stupid to know, or care, what an apostrophe
> means, then I'd say there are now four of you."

What a bunch of nit-pickers on the Pen Gang.

On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:40:54 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> >> blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> >> >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> >> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> >> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> >> 14, 2022
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> >> been a
> >> >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> >> "obvious" isn't
> >> >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> >> evidence, I
> >> >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >> >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> >> simply
> >> >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >> >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> >> OPs made
> >> >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> >> 7-day period
> >> >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >> >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >> >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> >> up for
> >> >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> >> of which
> >> >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> >> Index of
> >> >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> >> subject's OPs
> >> >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> >> in posts
> >> >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> >> triple. Which
> >> >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> >> concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> >> more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> >> he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> >> than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> >> you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> >> >>>>> exists -
> >> >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> >> >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> >> >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> >> aapc; and
> >> >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> >> meaning
> >> >>>>> he never saw it.
> >> >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> >> behind his back.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> >> slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> HTH and HAND.
> >> >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> >> >> So what?
> >> >>
> >> >> You read and replied to the post.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> >> nothing about.
> >> Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> >> works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> >> one usenet group.
>
> > You're the one who isn't understanding, George (perhaps intentionally).
>
> > When you cross-post to different groups, Jim is only able to address your comments in the group/s he is a member of.
>
> > If you cross-post to RAP and Jim is not a member of RAP, your post (and any accusations it contains) will go unaddressed.
>
> > Both you and your Donkey have stressed what you believe to be the importance of "setting the record straight." How can Jim set the record straight in groups that he isn't a member of, and is therefore unaware that any accusations had been posted?
>
> > The alleged accusation that you have been posting behind Jim's back is 100% correct.
>
> > It's a Georgie Porgie tactic: attack in several groups. When those you've attacked confront you in one of the groups, you'll still remain unchallenged in the others.
> Actually, cross posting the truth /is/ setting the record straight.

Only in the mind of a 5-year old, Donkey.

Posting actual *evidence* that negates the false claim is the only way to "set the record straight."

Incessant whining, otoh, only reinforces the accusations, as it confirms that no evidence to the contrary exists.

-- Michael Pendragon

Die Stink, die.
Stop stinking up the place
Cover your ugly face
With sod so foul that only brambles dare
Take root atop its filth. Your grizzled hair
Long home to ticks and fleas
Shall be the straw where graveworms make their bed;
The earth repels you like some rank disease
The sun shines brighter knowing that you're dead
And songbird choirs echo "Die Stink, die."

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:40:54 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> >> >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
>> >> >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
>
>> >> >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
>> >> 14, 2022
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
>> >> been a
>> >> >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
>> >> "obvious" isn't
>> >> >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
>> >> evidence, I
>> >> >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> >> >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
>> >> simply
>> >> >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> >> >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
>> >> OPs made
>> >> >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
>> >> 7-day period
>> >> >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> >> >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> >> >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
>> >> up for
>> >> >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
>> >> of which
>> >> >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
>> >> Index of
>> >> >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
>> >> subject's OPs
>> >> >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
>> >> in posts
>> >> >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
>> >> triple. Which
>> >> >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
>> >> concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
>> >> more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
>> >> he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
>> >> than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
>> >> you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
>> >> >>>>> exists -
>> >> >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
>> >> >>>>> - in light of the fact that
>> >> >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
>> >> aapc; and
>> >> >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
>> >> meaning
>> >> >>>>> he never saw it.
>> >> >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
>> >> behind his back.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
>> >> slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> HTH and HAND.
>> >> >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
>> >> >> So what?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You read and replied to the post.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
>> >> nothing about.
>> >> Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
>> >> works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
>> >> one usenet group.
>>
>> > You're the one who isn't understanding, George (perhaps intentionally).
>>
>> > When you cross-post to different groups, Jim is only able to address your comments in the group/s he is a member of.
>>
>> > If you cross-post to RAP and Jim is not a member of RAP, your post (and any accusations it contains) will go unaddressed.
>>
>> > Both you and your Donkey have stressed what you believe to be the importance of "setting the record straight." How can Jim set the record straight in groups that he isn't a member of, and is therefore unaware that any accusations had been posted?
>>
>> > The alleged accusation that you have been posting behind Jim's back is 100% correct.
>>
>> > It's a Georgie Porgie tactic: attack in several groups. When those you've attacked confront you in one of the groups, you'll still remain unchallenged in the others.
>> Actually, cross posting the truth /is/ setting the record straight.

> Only in the mind of a 5-year old,

You are the most childish poster on the group, Pendragon....

Just saying....

On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 9:35:34 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:40:54 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >> >> >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> >> >> >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> >
> >> >> >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> >> >> 14, 2022
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> >> >> been a
> >> >> >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> >> >> "obvious" isn't
> >> >> >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> >> >> evidence, I
> >> >> >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >> >> >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> >> >> simply
> >> >> >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >> >> >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> >> >> OPs made
> >> >> >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> >> >> 7-day period
> >> >> >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >> >> >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >> >> >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> >> >> up for
> >> >> >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> >> >> of which
> >> >> >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> >> >> Index of
> >> >> >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> >> >> subject's OPs
> >> >> >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> >> >> in posts
> >> >> >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> >> >> triple. Which
> >> >> >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> >> >> concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> >> >> more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> >> >> he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> >> >> than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> >> >> you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> >> >> >>>>> exists -
> >> >> >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> >> >> >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> >> >> >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> >> >> aapc; and
> >> >> >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> >> >> meaning
> >> >> >>>>> he never saw it.
> >> >> >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> >> >> behind his back.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> >> >> slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> HTH and HAND.
> >> >> >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> >> >> >> So what?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You read and replied to the post.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> >> >> nothing about.
> >> >> Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> >> >> works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> >> >> one usenet group.
> >>
> >> > You're the one who isn't understanding, George (perhaps intentionally).
> >>
> >> > When you cross-post to different groups, Jim is only able to address your comments in the group/s he is a member of.
> >>
> >> > If you cross-post to RAP and Jim is not a member of RAP, your post (and any accusations it contains) will go unaddressed.
> >>
> >> > Both you and your Donkey have stressed what you believe to be the importance of "setting the record straight." How can Jim set the record straight in groups that he isn't a member of, and is therefore unaware that any accusations had been posted?
> >>
> >> > The alleged accusation that you have been posting behind Jim's back is 100% correct.
> >>
> >> > It's a Georgie Porgie tactic: attack in several groups. When those you've attacked confront you in one of the groups, you'll still remain unchallenged in the others.
> >> Actually, cross posting the truth /is/ setting the record straight.
>
> > Only in the mind of a 5-year old,
> You are the most childish poster on the group, Pendragon....
>
> Just saying....

IKYABWAI much, Stinky?

Michael Pendragon
"Memories... pressed between the pages just like fine wine...…........."
-- George "Stink" Sulzbach, career pissbum

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 9:35:34 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>>
>> > On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:40:54 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
>> >> >> 14, 2022
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
>> >> >> been a
>> >> >> >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
>> >> >> "obvious" isn't
>> >> >> >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
>> >> >> evidence, I
>> >> >> >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> >> >> >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
>> >> >> simply
>> >> >> >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> >> >> >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
>> >> >> OPs made
>> >> >> >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
>> >> >> 7-day period
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> >> >> >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> >> >> >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
>> >> >> up for
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
>> >> >> of which
>> >> >> >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
>> >> >> Index of
>> >> >> >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
>> >> >> subject's OPs
>> >> >> >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
>> >> >> in posts
>> >> >> >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
>> >> >> triple. Which
>> >> >> >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
>> >> >> concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
>> >> >> more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
>> >> >> he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
>> >> >> than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
>> >> >> you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
>> >> >> >>>>> exists -
>> >> >> >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
>> >> >> >>>>> - in light of the fact that
>> >> >> >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
>> >> >> aapc; and
>> >> >> >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
>> >> >> meaning
>> >> >> >>>>> he never saw it.
>> >> >> >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
>> >> >> behind his back.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
>> >> >> slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> HTH and HAND.
>> >> >> >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
>> >> >> >> So what?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> You read and replied to the post.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
>> >> >> nothing about.
>> >> >> Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
>> >> >> works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
>> >> >> one usenet group.
>> >>
>> >> > You're the one who isn't understanding, George (perhaps intentionally).
>> >>
>> >> > When you cross-post to different groups, Jim is only able to address your comments in the group/s he is a member of.
>> >>
>> >> > If you cross-post to RAP and Jim is not a member of RAP, your post (and any accusations it contains) will go unaddressed.
>> >>
>> >> > Both you and your Donkey have stressed what you believe to be the importance of "setting the record straight." How can Jim set the record straight in groups that he isn't a member of, and is therefore unaware that any accusations had been posted?
>> >>
>> >> > The alleged accusation that you have been posting behind Jim's back is 100% correct.
>> >>
>> >> > It's a Georgie Porgie tactic: attack in several groups. When those you've attacked confront you in one of the groups, you'll still remain unchallenged in the others.
>> >> Actually, cross posting the truth /is/ setting the record straight.
>>
>> > Only in the mind of a 5-year old,
>> You are the most childish poster on the group, Pendragon....
>>
>> Just saying....

> IKYABWAI much

Look who's talking, Michael Pendragon, the shit spewing little monkey.

HTH and HAND.

On Thursday, October 6, 2022 at 6:37:20 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 9:35:34 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:40:54 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> >> >> >> 14, 2022
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> >> >> >> been a
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> >> >> >> "obvious" isn't
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> >> >> >> evidence, I
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> >> >> >> simply
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> >> >> >> OPs made
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> >> >> >> 7-day period
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> >> >> >> up for
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> >> >> >> of which
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> >> >> >> Index of
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> >> >> >> subject's OPs
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> >> >> >> in posts
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> >> >> >> triple. Which
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> >> >> >> concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> >> >> >> more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> >> >> >> he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> >> >> >> than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> >> >> >> you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> >> >> >> >>>>> exists -
> >> >> >> >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> >> >> >> >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> >> >> >> >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> >> >> >> aapc; and
> >> >> >> >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> >> >> >> meaning
> >> >> >> >>>>> he never saw it.
> >> >> >> >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> >> >> >> behind his back.
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> >> >> >> slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> HTH and HAND.
> >> >> >> >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> >> >> >> >> So what?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> You read and replied to the post.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> >> >> >> nothing about.
> >> >> >> Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> >> >> >> works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> >> >> >> one usenet group.
> >> >>
> >> >> > You're the one who isn't understanding, George (perhaps intentionally).
> >> >>
> >> >> > When you cross-post to different groups, Jim is only able to address your comments in the group/s he is a member of.
> >> >>
> >> >> > If you cross-post to RAP and Jim is not a member of RAP, your post (and any accusations it contains) will go unaddressed.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Both you and your Donkey have stressed what you believe to be the importance of "setting the record straight." How can Jim set the record straight in groups that he isn't a member of, and is therefore unaware that any accusations had been posted?
> >> >>
> >> >> > The alleged accusation that you have been posting behind Jim's back is 100% correct.
> >> >>
> >> >> > It's a Georgie Porgie tactic: attack in several groups. When those you've attacked confront you in one of the groups, you'll still remain unchallenged in the others.
> >> >> Actually, cross posting the truth /is/ setting the record straight.
> >>
> >> > Only in the mind of a 5-year old,
> >> You are the most childish poster on the group, Pendragon....
> >>
> >> Just saying....
>
> > IKYABWAI much
> Look who's talking, Michael Pendragon, the shit spewing little monkey.
>
> HTH and HAND.

TROLL THREAD *PLONKED*

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Thursday, October 6, 2022 at 6:37:20 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>>
>> > On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 9:35:34 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:40:54 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> >> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
>> >> >> >> 14, 2022
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
>> >> >> >> been a
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
>> >> >> >> "obvious" isn't
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
>> >> >> >> evidence, I
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
>> >> >> >> simply
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
>> >> >> >> OPs made
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
>> >> >> >> 7-day period
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
>> >> >> >> up for
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
>> >> >> >> of which
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
>> >> >> >> Index of
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
>> >> >> >> subject's OPs
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
>> >> >> >> in posts
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
>> >> >> >> triple. Which
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
>> >> >> >> concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
>> >> >> >> more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
>> >> >> >> he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
>> >> >> >> than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
>> >> >> >> you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
>> >> >> >> >>>>> exists -
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> - in light of the fact that
>> >> >> >> >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
>> >> >> >> aapc; and
>> >> >> >> >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
>> >> >> >> meaning
>> >> >> >> >>>>> he never saw it.
>> >> >> >> >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
>> >> >> >> behind his back.
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
>> >> >> >> slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> HTH and HAND.
>> >> >> >> >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
>> >> >> >> >> So what?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> You read and replied to the post.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
>> >> >> >> nothing about.
>> >> >> >> Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
>> >> >> >> works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
>> >> >> >> one usenet group.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > You're the one who isn't understanding, George (perhaps intentionally).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > When you cross-post to different groups, Jim is only able to address your comments in the group/s he is a member of.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > If you cross-post to RAP and Jim is not a member of RAP, your post (and any accusations it contains) will go unaddressed.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Both you and your Donkey have stressed what you believe to be the importance of "setting the record straight." How can Jim set the record straight in groups that he isn't a member of, and is therefore unaware that any accusations had been posted?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > The alleged accusation that you have been posting behind Jim's back is 100% correct.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > It's a Georgie Porgie tactic: attack in several groups. When those you've attacked confront you in one of the groups, you'll still remain unchallenged in the others.
>> >> >> Actually, cross posting the truth /is/ setting the record straight.
>> >>
>> >> > Only in the mind of a 5-year old,
>> >> You are the most childish poster on the group, Pendragon....
>> >>
>> >> Just saying....
>>
>> > IKYABWAI much
>> Look who's talking, Michael Pendragon, the shit spewing little monkey.
>>
>> HTH and HAND.

George J. Dance wrote:
>
> (cleaned-up copy)

> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed).

> For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> as a percentage of the former to calculate
> the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.

NancyGene is sniffing along today, apparently.