In article <ujdqr4$3ul37$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>On 2023-11-19 11:34:43 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 4:40 am:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> So he obviously hates Suella Braverman then. Doesn't that make him a
>>> racist and a bigot, hating and encouraging others to hate and despise a
>>> (now former) government minister-of-colour that was appointed by the
>>> first ever British Prime Minister-of-colour?
>>>
>> Hmm!! Does Britain now have a 'Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>
>> Or should that be a 'White Prime Minister' and a 'Prime Minister-of-colour'??
>
>The fact that the news media is pushing that "Rishi Sunak is about to
>become the UK's first prime minister of colour and the first Hindu
>prime minister" simply proves they don't get it at all. The man's skin
>colour, religion, etc. is completely irrelevant to him getting or doing
>the job - if that was the reason he got the job, then it's
>reverse-racism.
>
>As soon as all these "Politically Correct" morons understand that, the
>sooner there will be true "equality" ... not that any of them actually
>want that. What they really want is the complete opposite of
>"equality": they want to have special privileges for themselves based
>on their skin colour / religion / gender / etc.
>
>

Exactly correct!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <ujds4p$3up3r$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 19/11/2023 11:29, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 7:31 am:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> If Tennant can go around attacking a female government minster because
>>> she is anti-woke than everyone else has the same right to attack
>>> anyone or anything that is either woke or pro-woke.
>>>
>> Isn't being 'woke' the same as being 'pro-woke'?? Can you be 'woke' by
>> being 'anti-woke'??
>
>No. Being woke is being a totally brainwashed retard. Being pro-woke is
>promoting being a totally brainwashed retard.

Exactly!
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <ujdsco$3up3r$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 19/11/2023 20:23, Your Name wrote:
>> On 2023-11-19 11:34:43 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 4:40 am:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>> So he obviously hates Suella Braverman then. Doesn't that make him a
>>>> racist and a bigot, hating and encouraging others to hate and despise
>>>> a (now former) government minister-of-colour that was appointed by
>>>> the first ever British Prime Minister-of-colour?
>>>>
>>> Hmm!! Does Britain now have a 'Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>>
>>> Or should that be a 'White Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>
>> The fact that the news media is pushing that "Rishi Sunak is about to
>> become the UK's first prime minister of colour and the first Hindu prime
>
>He already is.
>
>> minister" simply proves they don't get it at all. The man's skin colour,
>> religion, etc. is completely irrelevant to him getting or doing the job
>> - if that was the reason he got the job, then it's reverse-racism.
>>
>> As soon as all these "Politically Correct" morons understand that, the
>> sooner there will be true "equality" ... not that any of them actually
>> want that. What they really want is the complete opposite of "equality":
>> they want to have special privileges for themselves based on their skin
>> colour / religion / gender / etc.
>>
>>
>
>That has always been the woke ideology. They're the pigs in Animal Farm
>who must have more privileges over all the other animals while at the
>same time claiming that all animals are equal. These woke bigots think
>that they are superior to everyone and everything.
>

Napoleon at work.

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

The True Doctor wrote on 20/11/23 7:45 am:
> On 19/11/2023 11:29, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 7:31 am:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> If Tennant can go around attacking a female government minster
>>> because she is anti-woke than everyone else has the same right to
>>> attack anyone or anything that is either woke or pro-woke.
>>>
>> Isn't being 'woke' the same as being 'pro-woke'?? Can you be 'woke' by
>> being 'anti-woke'??
>
> No. Being woke is being a totally brainwashed retard. Being pro-woke is
> promoting being a totally brainwashed retard.
>
Hey, what do you know?? I agree with you, Agamemnon, for once .......

So how can you suggest (still showing above) "everyone else has the same
right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke or pro-woke"??

--
Daniel

Your Name wrote on 20/11/23 7:23 am:
> On 2023-11-19 11:34:43 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 4:40 am:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> So he obviously hates Suella Braverman then. Doesn't that make
>>> him a racist and a bigot, hating and encouraging others to hate
>>> and despise a (now former) government minister-of-colour that was
>>> appointed by the first ever British Prime Minister-of-colour?
>>>
>> Hmm!! Does Britain now have a 'Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>
>> Or should that be a 'White Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>> Minister-of-colour'??
>
> The fact that the news media is pushing that "Rishi Sunak is about to
> become the UK's first prime minister of colour and the first Hindu
> prime minister" simply proves they don't get it at all. The man's
> skin colour, religion, etc. is completely irrelevant to him getting
> or doing the job - if that was the reason he got the job, then it's
> reverse-racism.

And whilst you're at it, forget "The *man's* skin colour, religion, etc.
is completely irrelevant"!!

Maggie proved sexism was unnecessary as well!!

> As soon as all these "Politically Correct" morons understand that,
> the sooner there will be true "equality" ... not that any of them
> actually want that. What they really want is the complete opposite of
> "equality": they want to have special privileges for themselves based
> on their skin colour / religion / gender / etc.
--
Daniel

In article <ujffcs$9rfp$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The True Doctor wrote on 20/11/23 7:45 am:
>> On 19/11/2023 11:29, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 7:31 am:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>> If Tennant can go around attacking a female government minster
>>>> because she is anti-woke than everyone else has the same right to
>>>> attack anyone or anything that is either woke or pro-woke.
>>>>
>>> Isn't being 'woke' the same as being 'pro-woke'?? Can you be 'woke' by
>>> being 'anti-woke'??
>>
>> No. Being woke is being a totally brainwashed retard. Being pro-woke is
>> promoting being a totally brainwashed retard.
>>
>Hey, what do you know?? I agree with you, Agamemnon, for once .......
>
>So how can you suggest (still showing above) "everyone else has the same
>right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke or pro-woke"??
>

Exactly!-)

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <ujffol$9t5a$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Your Name wrote on 20/11/23 7:23 am:
>> On 2023-11-19 11:34:43 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 4:40 am:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>> So he obviously hates Suella Braverman then. Doesn't that make
>>>> him a racist and a bigot, hating and encouraging others to hate
>>>> and despise a (now former) government minister-of-colour that was
>>>> appointed by the first ever British Prime Minister-of-colour?
>>>>
>>> Hmm!! Does Britain now have a 'Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>>
>>> Or should that be a 'White Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>
>> The fact that the news media is pushing that "Rishi Sunak is about to
>> become the UK's first prime minister of colour and the first Hindu
>> prime minister" simply proves they don't get it at all. The man's
>> skin colour, religion, etc. is completely irrelevant to him getting
>> or doing the job - if that was the reason he got the job, then it's
>> reverse-racism.
>
>And whilst you're at it, forget "The *man's* skin colour, religion, etc.
>is completely irrelevant"!!
>
>Maggie proved sexism was unnecessary as well!!
>

Who? Thatchos?

>> As soon as all these "Politically Correct" morons understand that,
>> the sooner there will be true "equality" ... not that any of them
>> actually want that. What they really want is the complete opposite of
>> "equality": they want to have special privileges for themselves based
>> on their skin colour / religion / gender / etc.
>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

On 20/11/2023 11:26, Daniel65 wrote:
> Your Name wrote on 20/11/23 7:23 am:
>> On 2023-11-19 11:34:43 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 4:40 am:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>> So he obviously hates Suella Braverman then. Doesn't that make
>>>> him a racist and a bigot, hating and encouraging others to hate
>>>> and despise a (now former) government minister-of-colour that was
>>>> appointed by the first ever British Prime Minister-of-colour?
>>>>
>>> Hmm!! Does Britain now have a 'Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>>
>>> Or should that be a 'White Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>
>> The fact that the news media is pushing that "Rishi Sunak is about to
>> become the UK's first prime minister of colour and the first Hindu
>> prime minister" simply proves they don't get it at all. The man's
>> skin colour, religion, etc. is completely irrelevant to him getting
>> or doing the job - if that was the reason he got the job, then it's
>> reverse-racism.
>
> And whilst you're at it, forget "The *man's* skin colour, religion, etc.
> is completely irrelevant"!!
>
> Maggie proved sexism was unnecessary as well!!
>

Here goes another Squealer dissembling, lying and deceiving his
interlocutors by appealing to peoples stupidity.

Everyone with intelligence knows full well that Gatwa was only cast
because of how he looked and because he was a homosexual. There were
plenty of better actors that more closely fitted the character
description of the Doctor Who and would have been more believable, but
Davies had already decided and the BBC had decided for him that the
actor must be chosen to tick fake diversity tick boxes and virtue signal.

These woke tick boxes were RTDs primary motivation proving that RTD is
the real racist, homophobe, sexist, and bigot. His attempt to virtue
signal about portraying Davros as able bodied instead of referencing
existing continuity proves it, since there was no justification for him
to virtue signal and promote false narratives. He was utterly condemned
by wheelchair users who never asked this retard to represent either them
or people like them. Ironside and Professor X both had to use
wheelchairs and neither of them were evil.

>> As soon as all these "Politically Correct" morons understand that,
>> the sooner there will be true "equality" ... not that any of them
>> actually want that. What they really want is the complete opposite of
>> "equality": they want to have special privileges for themselves based
>> on their skin colour / religion / gender / etc.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 20/11/2023 11:19, Daniel65 wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote on 20/11/23 7:45 am:
>> On 19/11/2023 11:29, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 7:31 am:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>> If Tennant can go around attacking a female government minster
>>>> because she is anti-woke than everyone else has the same right to
>>>> attack anyone or anything that is either woke or pro-woke.
>>>>
>>> Isn't being 'woke' the same as being 'pro-woke'?? Can you be 'woke'
>>> by being 'anti-woke'??
>>
>> No. Being woke is being a totally brainwashed retard. Being pro-woke
>> is promoting being a totally brainwashed retard.
>>
> Hey, what do you know?? I agree with you, Agamemnon, for once .......
>
> So how can you suggest (still showing above) "everyone else has the same
> right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke or pro-woke"??
>

It's called freedom of speech.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

In article <ujg1sc$cnq4$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 20/11/2023 11:26, Daniel65 wrote:
>> Your Name wrote on 20/11/23 7:23 am:
>>> On 2023-11-19 11:34:43 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 4:40 am:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>> So he obviously hates Suella Braverman then. Doesn't that make
>>>>> him a racist and a bigot, hating and encouraging others to hate
>>>>> and despise a (now former) government minister-of-colour that was
>>>>> appointed by the first ever British Prime Minister-of-colour?
>>>>>
>>>> Hmm!! Does Britain now have a 'Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>>>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>>>
>>>> Or should that be a 'White Prime Minister' and a 'Prime
>>>> Minister-of-colour'??
>>>
>>> The fact that the news media is pushing that "Rishi Sunak is about to
>>> become the UK's first prime minister of colour and the first Hindu
>>> prime minister" simply proves they don't get it at all. The man's
>>> skin colour, religion, etc. is completely irrelevant to him getting
>>> or doing the job - if that was the reason he got the job, then it's
>>> reverse-racism.
>>
>> And whilst you're at it, forget "The *man's* skin colour, religion, etc.
>> is completely irrelevant"!!
>>
>> Maggie proved sexism was unnecessary as well!!
>>
>
>Here goes another Squealer dissembling, lying and deceiving his
>interlocutors by appealing to peoples stupidity.
>
>Everyone with intelligence knows full well that Gatwa was only cast
>because of how he looked and because he was a homosexual. There were
>plenty of better actors that more closely fitted the character
>description of the Doctor Who and would have been more believable, but
>Davies had already decided and the BBC had decided for him that the
>actor must be chosen to tick fake diversity tick boxes and virtue signal.
>
>These woke tick boxes were RTDs primary motivation proving that RTD is
>the real racist, homophobe, sexist, and bigot. His attempt to virtue
>signal about portraying Davros as able bodied instead of referencing
>existing continuity proves it, since there was no justification for him
>to virtue signal and promote false narratives. He was utterly condemned
>by wheelchair users who never asked this retard to represent either them
>or people like them. Ironside and Professor X both had to use
>wheelchairs and neither of them were evil.
>

And hired for it!

>>> As soon as all these "Politically Correct" morons understand that,
>>> the sooner there will be true "equality" ... not that any of them
>>> actually want that. What they really want is the complete opposite of
>>> "equality": they want to have special privileges for themselves based
>>> on their skin colour / religion / gender / etc.
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <ujg1v4$cnq4$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 20/11/2023 11:19, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 20/11/23 7:45 am:
>>> On 19/11/2023 11:29, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 7:31 am:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>> If Tennant can go around attacking a female government minster
>>>>> because she is anti-woke than everyone else has the same right to
>>>>> attack anyone or anything that is either woke or pro-woke.
>>>>>
>>>> Isn't being 'woke' the same as being 'pro-woke'?? Can you be 'woke'
>>>> by being 'anti-woke'??
>>>
>>> No. Being woke is being a totally brainwashed retard. Being pro-woke
>>> is promoting being a totally brainwashed retard.
>>>
>> Hey, what do you know?? I agree with you, Agamemnon, for once .......
>>
>> So how can you suggest (still showing above) "everyone else has the same
>> right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke or pro-woke"??
>>
>
>It's called freedom of speech.
>

Cheers!

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

The needs-to-be-seen-by-a-True Doctor wrote:

>
> Here goes another Squealer dissembling, lying and deceiving his
> interlocutors by appealing to peoples stupidity.
>

Is being a ‘Squealer’ better or worse than being a ‘woke
retard’?

--
solar penguin

solar penguin wrote:

>
> The needs-to-be-seen-by-a-True Doctor wrote:
>
> >
> > Here goes another Squealer dissembling, lying and deceiving his
> > interlocutors by appealing to peoples stupidity.
>
> Is being a ‘Squealer’ better or worse than being a ‘woke
> retard’?

Agamemnon must have just discovered the writings of George Orwell or
something, he's starting to sound like a young boy who has just
discovered his willy...

In article <ujg40g$d3q4$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>The needs-to-be-seen-by-a-True Doctor wrote:
>
>>
>> Here goes another Squealer dissembling, lying and deceiving his
>> interlocutors by appealing to peoples stupidity.
>>
>
>Is being a ‘Squealer’ better or worse than being a ‘woke
>retard’?
>

Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin on a nosedive.

>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <nnd$06931932$603b70d4@ae795f546660adee>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>solar penguin wrote:
>
>>
>> The needs-to-be-seen-by-a-True Doctor wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Here goes another Squealer dissembling, lying and deceiving his
>> > interlocutors by appealing to peoples stupidity.
>>
>> Is being a ‘Squealer’ better or worse than being a ‘woke
>> retard’?
>
>Agamemnon must have just discovered the writings of George Orwell or
>something, he's starting to sound like a young boy who has just
>discovered his willy...

Trying to be funny?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
> On 20/11/2023 11:19, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 20/11/23 7:45 am:
>>> On 19/11/2023 11:29, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 7:31 am:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>> If Tennant can go around attacking a female government
>>>>> minster because she is anti-woke than everyone else has the
>>>>> same right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke
>>>>> or pro-woke.
>>>>>
>>>> Isn't being 'woke' the same as being 'pro-woke'?? Can you be
>>>> 'woke' by being 'anti-woke'??
>>>
>>> No. Being woke is being a totally brainwashed retard. Being
>>> pro-woke is promoting being a totally brainwashed retard.
>>>
>> Hey, what do you know?? I agree with you, Agamemnon, for once
>> .......
>>
>> So how can you suggest (still showing above) "everyone else has the
>> same right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke or
>> pro-woke"??
>
> It's called freedom of speech.
>
Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything then!!
--
Daniel

On 21/11/2023 09:38, Daniel65 wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
>> On 20/11/2023 11:19, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 20/11/23 7:45 am:
>>>> On 19/11/2023 11:29, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 7:31 am:
>>>>>
>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>> If Tennant can go around attacking a female government
>>>>>> minster because she is anti-woke than everyone else has the
>>>>>> same right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke
>>>>>> or pro-woke.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't being 'woke' the same as being 'pro-woke'?? Can you be
>>>>> 'woke' by being 'anti-woke'??
>>>>
>>>> No. Being woke is being a totally brainwashed retard. Being
>>>> pro-woke is promoting being a totally brainwashed retard.
>>>>
>>> Hey, what do you know?? I agree with you, Agamemnon, for once
>>> .......
>>>
>>> So how can you suggest (still showing above) "everyone else has the
>>>  same right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke or
>>> pro-woke"??
>>
>> It's called freedom of speech.
>>
> Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything then!!

It means that everyone is free to say anything they want to say. Woke
retards on the far left need to be educated about it.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

In article <ujhtqi$paqp$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
>> On 20/11/2023 11:19, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 20/11/23 7:45 am:
>>>> On 19/11/2023 11:29, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 7:31 am:
>>>>>
>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>> If Tennant can go around attacking a female government
>>>>>> minster because she is anti-woke than everyone else has the
>>>>>> same right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke
>>>>>> or pro-woke.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't being 'woke' the same as being 'pro-woke'?? Can you be
>>>>> 'woke' by being 'anti-woke'??
>>>>
>>>> No. Being woke is being a totally brainwashed retard. Being
>>>> pro-woke is promoting being a totally brainwashed retard.
>>>>
>>> Hey, what do you know?? I agree with you, Agamemnon, for once
>>> .......
>>>
>>> So how can you suggest (still showing above) "everyone else has the
>>> same right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke or
>>> pro-woke"??
>>
>> It's called freedom of speech.
>>
>Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything then!!
>--
>Daniel

Well ...
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <uji7ej$qsba$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 21/11/2023 09:38, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
>>> On 20/11/2023 11:19, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 20/11/23 7:45 am:
>>>>> On 19/11/2023 11:29, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/23 7:31 am:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If Tennant can go around attacking a female government
>>>>>>> minster because she is anti-woke than everyone else has the
>>>>>>> same right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke
>>>>>>> or pro-woke.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Isn't being 'woke' the same as being 'pro-woke'?? Can you be
>>>>>> 'woke' by being 'anti-woke'??
>>>>>
>>>>> No. Being woke is being a totally brainwashed retard. Being
>>>>> pro-woke is promoting being a totally brainwashed retard.
>>>>>
>>>> Hey, what do you know?? I agree with you, Agamemnon, for once
>>>> .......
>>>>
>>>> So how can you suggest (still showing above) "everyone else has the
>>>>  same right to attack anyone or anything that is either woke or
>>>> pro-woke"??
>>>
>>> It's called freedom of speech.
>>>
>> Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything then!!
>
>It means that everyone is free to say anything they want to say. Woke
>retards on the far left need to be educated about it.
>

Hear! Hear!!

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 21/11/2023 09:38, Daniel65 wrote:
> > The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
> > >
> > > It's called freedom of speech.
> > >
> > Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything then!!
>
> It means that everyone is free to say anything they want to say. Woke
> retards on the far left need to be educated about it.

You DO say - and attack - anything that you want to!!! Nobody stops you
having your say here. But we have a right to reply to your posts and say
they are nonsense if that's what we think... I have replied (politely
enough) to many of your posts. But you just call everyone "squealer" or
"woke retards" which then gives everyone the impression that it is YOU
that can't handle people with a different opinion to yourself.

Oh, and I'd rather called be "Old Major"... as I am an old fat pig whose
best days are behind him. Thanks.

Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 21/11/2023 09:38, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
>>>>
>>>> It's called freedom of speech.
>>>>
>>> Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything then!!
>>
>> It means that everyone is free to say anything they want to say. Woke
>> retards on the far left need to be educated about it.
>
> You DO say - and attack - anything that you want to!!! Nobody stops you
> having your say here. But we have a right to reply to your posts and say
> they are nonsense if that's what we think...

That is Aggie’s main problem. He doesn’t think he has opinions - he has an
utterly insane certainty on his rectitude. And if that meant “talking out
of his rectum” he’d be right.

I have replied (politely
> enough) to many of your posts. But you just call everyone "squealer" or
> "woke retards" which then gives everyone the impression that it is YOU
> that can't handle people with a different opinion to yourself.

That’s not an impression - it’s a fact. Everyone but Aggie are illiterate,
uneducated fools who insist on using correct modern English and accept that
literature and drama have changed since ancient Egyptians, Indians and
Greeks independently originated the first forms of theatre.

> Oh, and I'd rather called be "Old Major"... as I am an old fat pig whose
> best days are behind him. Thanks.

Well if we’re all going to be characters in Amimal Farm then Aggie is
surely Mollie, as he refuses to even try to learn new things. Though he
thinks he’s Napoleon, of course.

As you’ve already selected Old Major then I choose Snowball.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

In article <xn0o9lxa93y6da9001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 21/11/2023 09:38, Daniel65 wrote:
>> > The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
>> > >
>> > > It's called freedom of speech.
>> > >
>> > Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything then!!
>>
>> It means that everyone is free to say anything they want to say. Woke
>> retards on the far left need to be educated about it.
>
>You DO say - and attack - anything that you want to!!! Nobody stops you
>having your say here. But we have a right to reply to your posts and say
>they are nonsense if that's what we think... I have replied (politely
>enough) to many of your posts. But you just call everyone "squealer" or
>"woke retards" which then gives everyone the impression that it is YOU
>that can't handle people with a different opinion to yourself.
>
>Oh, and I'd rather called be "Old Major"... as I am an old fat pig whose
>best days are behind him. Thanks.

Said BS the fat pig!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <ujj6od$103ut$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/11/2023 09:38, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's called freedom of speech.
>>>>>
>>>> Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything then!!
>>>
>>> It means that everyone is free to say anything they want to say. Woke
>>> retards on the far left need to be educated about it.
>>
>> You DO say - and attack - anything that you want to!!! Nobody stops you
>> having your say here. But we have a right to reply to your posts and say
>> they are nonsense if that's what we think...
>
>That is Aggie’s main problem. He doesn’t think he has opinions - he has an
>utterly insane certainty on his rectitude. And if that meant “talking out
>of his rectum” he’d be right.
>
>I have replied (politely
>> enough) to many of your posts. But you just call everyone "squealer" or
>> "woke retards" which then gives everyone the impression that it is YOU
>> that can't handle people with a different opinion to yourself.
>
>That’s not an impression - it’s a fact. Everyone but Aggie are illiterate,
>uneducated fools who insist on using correct modern English and accept that
>literature and drama have changed since ancient Egyptians, Indians and
>Greeks independently originated the first forms of theatre.
>
>> Oh, and I'd rather called be "Old Major"... as I am an old fat pig whose
>> best days are behind him. Thanks.
>
>Well if we’re all going to be characters in Amimal Farm then Aggie is
>surely Mollie, as he refuses to even try to learn new things. Though he
>thinks he’s Napoleon, of course.
>
>As you’ve already selected Old Major then I choose Snowball.
>

Art thou sane BlueShirt?

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

Blueshirt wrote on 22/11/23 7:38 am:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>> On 21/11/2023 09:38, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
>>>>
>>>> It's called freedom of speech.
>>>>
>>> Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything then!!
>>
>> It means that everyone is free to say anything they want to say.
>> Woke retards on the far left need to be educated about it.
>
> You DO say - and attack - anything that you want to!!! Nobody stops
> you having your say here. But we have a right to reply to your posts
> and say they are nonsense if that's what we think... I have replied
> (politely enough) to many of your posts. But you just call everyone
> "squealer" or "woke retards" which then gives everyone the impression
> that it is YOU that can't handle people with a different opinion to
> yourself.

Hear!! Hear!!

> Oh, and I'd rather called be "Old Major"... as I am an old fat pig
> whose best days are behind him. Thanks.
>
Whoosh!! Straight over my head! I have seen 'Animal Farm' ... many years
ago .... so, probably, those engrams have been re-purposed to some other
duties!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 22/11/23 8:50 am:
> In article <ujj6od$103ut$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>> On 21/11/2023 09:38, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 21/11/23 3:36 am:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's called freedom of speech.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ah!! O.K., so not necessarily supposed to mean anything
>>>>> then!!
>>>>
>>>> It means that everyone is free to say anything they want to
>>>> say. Woke retards on the far left need to be educated about
>>>> it.
>>>
>>> You DO say - and attack - anything that you want to!!! Nobody
>>> stops you having your say here. But we have a right to reply to
>>> your posts and say they are nonsense if that's what we think...
>>
>> That is Aggie’s main problem. He doesn’t think he has opinions
>> - he has an utterly insane certainty on his rectitude. And if that
>> meant “talking out of his rectum” he’d be right.
>>
>>> I have replied (politely enough) to many of your posts. But you
>>> just call everyone "squealer" or "woke retards" which then gives
>>> everyone the impression that it is YOU that can't handle people
>>> with a different opinion to yourself.
>>
>> That’s not an impression - it’s a fact. Everyone but Aggie are
>> illiterate, uneducated fools who insist on using correct modern
>> English and accept that literature and drama have changed since
>> ancient Egyptians, Indians and Greeks independently originated the
>> first forms of theatre.
>>
>>> Oh, and I'd rather called be "Old Major"... as I am an old fat
>>> pig whose best days are behind him. Thanks.
>>
>> Well if we’re all going to be characters in Amimal Farm then
>> Aggie is surely Mollie, as he refuses to even try to learn new
>> things. Though he thinks he’s Napoleon, of course.
>>
>> As you’ve already selected Old Major then I choose Snowball.
>
> Art thou sane BlueShirt?

Are YOU, asswipe, getting worse, asswipe?? For years YOU, asswipe, have,
seemingly, been unable to reply DIRECTLY to Idlehands, so reply to
Idlehands by replying with-in someone elses reply to Idlehands.

Now it seems YOU are having similar problems responding DIRECTLY to
Blueshirt!!
--
Daniel