The portrayal of Gallifrey, the Doctor's home world in Doctor Who, does bear
some parallels to aspects of Colonial Britain, particularly in its depiction of
a powerful, technologically advanced society with imperialistic tendencies.
However, it is essential to recognize that Gallifrey's depiction in Doctor Who
is multifaceted and draws from various historical and fictional influences,
making direct comparisons to Colonial Britain complex.

Imperialistic Tendencies:
Gallifrey, like Colonial Britain, is depicted as a dominant and often arrogant
society that asserts its influence over other civilizations. The Time Lords,
the ruling elite of Gallifrey, are portrayed as a powerful and technologically
advanced race that wields significant influence over the universe. They are
shown to intervene in the affairs of other planets and species, often acting as
self-appointed arbiters of time and space. This imperialistic attitude echoes
the expansionist policies of Colonial Britain, which sought to assert its
dominance over other territories and civilizations.

Class Structure and Elitism:
Gallifrey also shares similarities with Colonial Britain in its rigid class
structure and elitist society. The Time Lords are depicted as a privileged
aristocracy, with power and influence concentrated in the hands of a select
few. Other Gallifreyan citizens, such as the Outsiders, are marginalised and
oppressed, reflecting themes of social inequality and class division similar
to those found in Colonial Britain.

Technological Superiority:
Both Gallifrey and Colonial Britain are portrayed as possessing advanced
technology and scientific knowledge that sets them apart from other
civilisations. The Time Lords' mastery of time travel and temporal manipulation
is depicted as a hallmark of their superiority, much like Colonial Britain's
technological advancements in fields such as industry, transportation, and
communication. This technological superiority reinforces their sense of
entitlement and superiority over other societies.

Cultural Hegemony:
Gallifrey, like Colonial Britain, is depicted as exerting cultural hegemony
over other civilizations, imposing its values, norms, and standards on those
it deems inferior. The Time Lords' adherence to strict codes of conduct and
adherence to tradition mirrors the cultural imperialism of Colonial Britain,
which sought to impose Western values and beliefs on indigenous populations.

Resistance and Rebellion:
In both Gallifrey and Colonial Britain, there are instances of resistance and
rebellion against the ruling elite. The Doctor, as a renegade Time Lord,
challenges the status quo and opposes the oppressive policies
of the Time Lords, much like anti-colonial movements challenged British
colonial rule. These acts of resistance highlight the tensions and conflicts
inherent in societies built on domination and oppression.

**However, it's important to note that Gallifrey is a fictional world created
within the context of a science fiction television series, and its portrayal
is influenced by a wide range of factors, including narrative considerations,
thematic relevance, and creative vision. While Gallifrey may draw inspiration
from aspects of Colonial Britain, it also incorporates elements from other
historical periods, mythologies, and fictional universes. As such, any
comparisons between Gallifrey and Colonial Britain should be approached
with nuance and consideration for the complexities of both fictional
and real-world contexts.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

Subject: ChatGPT comments...

[snip all unread]

Who cares?

_Disclaimer_: _I only speak for myself_ _and no one else_.

Please stop.

If anyone wants some robot arranging words in some essay on any of these
subjects, I'm sure they can find out how to do it.

It's not something to reply to as if a real person wrote it. It's just
more noise.

I even don't find it worth reading. I'm interested in the thoughts of
people.

Preferably not too long texts in one go. :)

--

Mickmane

In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>Subject: ChatGPT comments...
>
>[snip all unread]
>
>Who cares?
>
>_Disclaimer_: _I only speak for myself_ _and no one else_.
>
>Please stop.
>
>If anyone wants some robot arranging words in some essay on any of these
>subjects, I'm sure they can find out how to do it.
>
>It's not something to reply to as if a real person wrote it. It's just
>more noise.
>
>I even don't find it worth reading. I'm interested in the thoughts of
>people.
>
>Preferably not too long texts in one go. :)
>

Well let's see what scraping the Internet results in.

>--
>
>Mickmane
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote:
> >
>
> Well let's see what scraping the Internet results in.

Scraping the bottom of the barrel for Doctor Who discussion more
like!

In article <xn0oif5k67p16l8004@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>> >
>>
>> Well let's see what scraping the Internet results in.
>
>Scraping the bottom of the barrel for Doctor Who discussion more
>like!

I wonder what ChatGPT was able to scrape from Usenet?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>> On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
>> wrote:

>> Subject: ChatGPT comments...

>> Please stop.
>>
>> If anyone wants some robot arranging words in some essay on any of
>> these subjects, I'm sure they can find out how to do it.

> Well let's see what scraping the Internet results in.

Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and not dump
it here unasked.

--

Mickmane

In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>> On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
>>> wrote:
>
>>> Subject: ChatGPT comments...
>
>>> Please stop.
>>>
>>> If anyone wants some robot arranging words in some essay on any of
>>> these subjects, I'm sure they can find out how to do it.
>
>> Well let's see what scraping the Internet results in.
>
>Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and not dump
>it here unasked.
>

Oi! Articales are worth discussing.

>--
>
>Mickmane
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
> > not dump it here unasked.
>
> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.

Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
better than a piece of software.

In theory...

On 24.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>> On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
>> wrote:
>>> In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>> On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
>>>> wrote:

>>>> Subject: ChatGPT comments...
>>
>>>> Please stop.
>>>>
>>>> If anyone wants some robot arranging words in some essay on any of
>>>> these subjects, I'm sure they can find out how to do it.
>>
>>> Well let's see what scraping the Internet results in.
>>
>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and not
>> dump it here unasked.

> Oi! Articales are worth discussing.

What articles? It's just a bunch of words arranged by some computer
program, no real person involved. Not worth reading.

In other words: Just more noise from you.

--

Mickmane

In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>> > not dump it here unasked.
>>
>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>
>Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
>better than a piece of software.
>
>In theory...

Well what about my reviews?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <GZTQxaxLczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>On 24.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>> On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>> In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>> Subject: ChatGPT comments...
>>>
>>>>> Please stop.
>>>>>
>>>>> If anyone wants some robot arranging words in some essay on any of
>>>>> these subjects, I'm sure they can find out how to do it.
>>>
>>>> Well let's see what scraping the Internet results in.
>>>
>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and not
>>> dump it here unasked.
>
>> Oi! Articales are worth discussing.
>
>What articles? It's just a bunch of words arranged by some computer
>program, no real person involved. Not worth reading.
>
>In other words: Just more noise from you.
>

IYIO.

>--
>
>Mickmane
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote:
> In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>>>> not dump it here unasked.
>>>
>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>
>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
>> better than a piece of software.
>>
>> In theory...
>
> Well what about my reviews?
>
are you tim

In article <9_ycnYJ3dYvM5kf4nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>>>>> not dump it here unasked.
>>>>
>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>
>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
>>> better than a piece of software.
>>>
>>> In theory...
>>
>> Well what about my reviews?
>>
>are you tim

no!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 2024-02-24 9:31 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>>> not dump it here unasked.
>>
>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>
> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
> better than a piece of software.
>
> In theory...

Binky is incapable of having his own "opinions", he can only give
opinions that have been given to him by others.

Case in point is his new obsession with ChatGPT and his "artwork" that
preceded this. I won't even start on his so-called "Christianity".

At least ChatGPT does not make spelling mistakes, something he will
never be able to do.

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

On 25.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <GZTQxaxLczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>> In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:

>>>>>> Subject: ChatGPT comments...
>>>>
>>>>>> Please stop.

>> What articles? It's just a bunch of words arranged by some computer
>> program, no real person involved. Not worth reading.
>>
>> In other words: Just more noise from you.

> IYIO.

I guess that means In Your Inspired Opinion.

It's certainly in my never humbe opinion.

And it's certainly not from any real person, so no one to reply to and
talk about it. Why bother read it? Why post it here?

I might as well count the bumps on my woodchip wallpaper, and start
drawing circles around one or the other, then post pictures of it here
so you can all admire me interacting with a non-entity.

--

Mickmane

The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:
> In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>>>> not dump it here unasked.
>>>
>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>
>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
>> better than a piece of software.
>>
>> In theory...
>
> Well what about my reviews?
>
They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU need
some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
--
Daniel

Idlehands wrote on 25/2/24 12:14 pm:
> On 2024-02-24 9:31 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>>>> not dump it here unasked.
>>>
>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>
>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
>> better than a piece of software.
>>
>> In theory...
>
> Binky is incapable of having his own "opinions", he can only give
> opinions that have been given to him by others.
>
> Case in point is his new obsession with ChatGPT and his "artwork" that
> preceded this.  I won't even start on his so-called "Christianity".
>
> At least ChatGPT does not make spelling mistakes, something he will
> never be able to do.
>
Here! Here!
--
Daniel

In article <GZXRIbqqczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>On 25.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <GZTQxaxLczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Subject: ChatGPT comments...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please stop.
>
>>> What articles? It's just a bunch of words arranged by some computer
>>> program, no real person involved. Not worth reading.
>>>
>>> In other words: Just more noise from you.
>
>> IYIO.
>
>I guess that means In Your Inspired Opinion.
>
>It's certainly in my never humbe opinion.
>

The send I is the opposite of Humble.

>And it's certainly not from any real person, so no one to reply to and
>talk about it. Why bother read it? Why post it here?
>
>I might as well count the bumps on my woodchip wallpaper, and start
>drawing circles around one or the other, then post pictures of it here
>so you can all admire me interacting with a non-entity.
>

Or is it based on what people think?

>--
>
>Mickmane
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <urf0kr$1p02t$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:
>> In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>>>>> not dump it here unasked.
>>>>
>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>
>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
>>> better than a piece of software.
>>>
>>> In theory...
>>
>> Well what about my reviews?
>>
>They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU need
>some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!

IYIO Red-beard!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <urf0p6$1p02t$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Idlehands wrote on 25/2/24 12:14 pm:
>> On 2024-02-24 9:31 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>>>>> not dump it here unasked.
>>>>
>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>
>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
>>> better than a piece of software.
>>>
>>> In theory...
>>
>> Binky is incapable of having his own "opinions", he can only give
>> opinions that have been given to him by others.
>>
>> Case in point is his new obsession with ChatGPT and his "artwork" that
>> preceded this.  I won't even start on his so-called "Christianity".
>>
>> At least ChatGPT does not make spelling mistakes, something he will
>> never be able to do.
>>
>Here! Here!

Oh?

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <urfhc6$2b7g$11@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>In article <urf0p6$1p02t$3@dont-email.me>,
>Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>Idlehands wrote on 25/2/24 12:14 pm:
>>> On 2024-02-24 9:31 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>>>>>> not dump it here unasked.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>>>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
>>>> better than a piece of software.
>>>>
>>>> In theory...
>>>
>>> Binky is incapable of having his own "opinions", he can only give
>>> opinions that have been given to him by others.
>>>
>>> Case in point is his new obsession with ChatGPT and his "artwork" that
>>> preceded this.  I won't even start on his so-called "Christianity".
>>>
>>> At least ChatGPT does not make spelling mistakes, something he will
>>> never be able to do.
>>>

Lying Idlehands can never tell the Truth!

>>Here! Here!
>
>Oh?
>
>>--
>>Daniel
>
>
>--
>Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
>Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
>Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
>What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 25.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <GZXRIbqqczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>> On 25.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
>> wrote:
>>> In article <GZTQxaxLczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:

>>>>>>>> Subject: ChatGPT comments...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please stop.
>>
>>>> What articles? It's just a bunch of words arranged by some
>>>> computer program, no real person involved. Not worth reading.
>>>>
>>>> In other words: Just more noise from you.
>>
>>> IYIO.
>>
>> I guess that means In Your Inspired Opinion.
>>
>> It's certainly in my never humbe opinion.

> The send I is the opposite of Humble.

You mean second?

So, inspired, important, irrisistible,...

>> And it's certainly not from any real person, so no one to reply to
>> and talk about it. Why bother read it? Why post it here?
>>
>> I might as well count the bumps on my woodchip wallpaper, and start
>> drawing circles around one or the other, then post pictures of it
>> here so you can all admire me interacting with a non-entity.

> Or is it based on what people think?

Oh, you don't even know?

If you had asked people, you could provide some data on who you asked.
That's missing, if any texts by people were involved at all, and not
texts posted by people quoting robots, who had assembled texts from
quoting other robots or their own previous texts,...

You're posting stuff you don't even know the source of.

You're not posting _your_ ideas.

Wait, why am I even trying to reason with you. I already know you're
completely insane.

I thought I could still just talk with you, kindly, what with you not
knowing what you're doing. But if you keep spamming this nonsense, all
that spam will be deleted on arrival, before I even see it.

--

Mickmane

Mickmane wrote:
>
> You're posting stuff you don't even know the source of.

I assume Doctor Who fans are responsible for inputting that stuff,
as Chat-GPT doesn't make it up. But with no sources quoted it just
becomes irrelevant in the big scheme of things. As Dave posts it but
he doesn't even say if he agrees with it or not!

> You're not posting your ideas.

You actually have to have ideas in the first place before you can
post them.

> Wait, why am I even trying to reason with you. I already know
> you're completely insane.

That didn't take long!!!
> I thought I could still just talk with you, kindly, what with you
> not knowing what you're doing. But if you keep spamming this
> nonsense, all that spam will be deleted on arrival, before I even
> see it.

We all go through that stage...

In article <GZXRelz5czB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>On 25.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <GZXRIbqqczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>> On 25.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>> In article <GZTQxaxLczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> Subject: ChatGPT comments...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please stop.
>>>
>>>>> What articles? It's just a bunch of words arranged by some
>>>>> computer program, no real person involved. Not worth reading.
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words: Just more noise from you.
>>>
>>>> IYIO.
>>>
>>> I guess that means In Your Inspired Opinion.
>>>
>>> It's certainly in my never humbe opinion.
>
>> The send I is the opposite of Humble.
>
>You mean second?
>
>So, inspired, important, irrisistible,...
>

Important!

>>> And it's certainly not from any real person, so no one to reply to
>>> and talk about it. Why bother read it? Why post it here?
>>>
>>> I might as well count the bumps on my woodchip wallpaper, and start
>>> drawing circles around one or the other, then post pictures of it
>>> here so you can all admire me interacting with a non-entity.
>
>> Or is it based on what people think?
>
>Oh, you don't even know?
>
>If you had asked people, you could provide some data on who you asked.
>That's missing, if any texts by people were involved at all, and not
>texts posted by people quoting robots, who had assembled texts from
>quoting other robots or their own previous texts,...
>
>You're posting stuff you don't even know the source of.
>
>You're not posting _your_ ideas.
>
>Wait, why am I even trying to reason with you. I already know you're
>completely insane.
>
>I thought I could still just talk with you, kindly, what with you not
>knowing what you're doing. But if you keep spamming this nonsense, all
>that spam will be deleted on arrival, before I even see it.
>

WEll the Truth is out there!

>--
>
>Mickmane
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Mickmane wrote:
>>
>> You're posting stuff you don't even know the source of.
>
>I assume Doctor Who fans are responsible for inputting that stuff,
>as Chat-GPT doesn't make it up. But with no sources quoted it just
>becomes irrelevant in the big scheme of things. As Dave posts it but
>he doesn't even say if he agrees with it or not!
>
>> You're not posting your ideas.
>
>You actually have to have ideas in the first place before you can
>post them.
>
>> Wait, why am I even trying to reason with you. I already know
>> you're completely insane.
>
>That didn't take long!!!
>
>> I thought I could still just talk with you, kindly, what with you
>> not knowing what you're doing. But if you keep spamming this
>> nonsense, all that spam will be deleted on arrival, before I even
>> see it.
>
>We all go through that stage...

And then you get Google!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown