On 2024-02-25 2:18 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:
>> In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
>>>>> not dump it here unasked.
>>>>
>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>
>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to do
>>> better than a piece of software.
>>>
>>> In theory...
>>
>> Well what about my reviews?
>>
> They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU need
> some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!

"Reviews"?????

LOLOLOL.

A mess of badly spelled lines that "review" nothing until it hits 0/10/

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

> In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> Mickmane wrote:

Aaah, those posts from xsnews still don't get here!

>>> You're posting stuff you don't even know the source of.
>>
>> I assume Doctor Who fans are responsible for inputting that stuff,
>> as Chat-GPT doesn't make it up.

Could be Doctor Who haters, or random people who know nothing about the
series. Could be purple tentacles posting from Pluto.

>> But with no sources quoted it just becomes irrelevant in the big
>> scheme of things.

Yep. My point exactly.

>> As Dave posts it but he doesn't even say if he agrees with it or not!

There's that.

>>> Wait, why am I even trying to reason with you. I already know
>>> you're completely insane.
>>
>> That didn't take long!!!

I established that a week or two ago, I think after he posted some
religious nuttery.

>>> I thought I could still just talk with you, kindly, what with you
>>> not knowing what you're doing. But if you keep spamming this
>>> nonsense, all that spam will be deleted on arrival, before I even
>>> see it.
>>
>> We all go through that stage...

Not sure, I see some people carrying on some feud, as if that would
actually change anything. (Well, all it affects is what _they_ look
like.)

--

Mickmane

The Doctor wrote on 26/2/24 1:03 am:
> In article <urf0kr$1p02t$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:
>>> In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves,
>>>>>> and not dump it here unasked.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>>>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to
>>>> do better than a piece of software.
>>>>
>>>> In theory...
>>>
>>> Well what about my reviews?
>>>
>> They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU
>> need some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>
> IYIO Red-beard!

Correct, "Yellow Beard Yadallee".
--
Daniel

Idlehands wrote on 26/2/24 7:47 am:
> On 2024-02-25 2:18 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:
>>> In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves,
>>>>>> and not dump it here unasked.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>>>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to
>>>> do better than a piece of software.
>>>>
>>>> In theory...
>>>
>>> Well what about my reviews?
>>>
>> They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU
>> need some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>
> "Reviews"?????
>
> LOLOLOL.
>
> A mess of badly spelled lines that "review" nothing until it hits
> 0/10/

Yeap.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 26/2/24 1:11 am:
> In article <urfhc6$2b7g$11@gallifrey.nk.ca>, The Doctor
> <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <urf0p6$1p02t$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> Idlehands wrote on 25/2/24 12:14 pm:
>>>> On 2024-02-24 9:31 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot
>>>>>>> themselves, and not dump it here unasked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You
>>>>> have actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be
>>>>> able to do better than a piece of software.
>>>>>
>>>>> In theory...
>>>>
>>>> Binky is incapable of having his own "opinions", he can only
>>>> give opinions that have been given to him by others.
>>>>
>>>> Case in point is his new obsession with ChatGPT and his
>>>> "artwork" that preceded this. I won't even start on his
>>>> so-called "Christianity".
>>>>
>>>> At least ChatGPT does not make spelling mistakes, something he
>>>> will never be able to do.
>
> Lying Idlehands can never tell the Truth!
>
>>> Here! Here!
>>
>> Oh?

Oh!! Look out, Idlehands, "Yellow Beard Yadallee" didn't think your
comment was worthwhile responding to .... the first time through .... so
HAD to come back to/for you!!

So an added Extra Bonus Post to add to his All Important Precious Post
Count!!
--
Daniel

Mickmane wrote:

> > In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> > Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> Mickmane wrote:
>
> Aaah, those posts from xsnews still don't get here!

Speak to your news admin...

Mickmane wrote:

> > In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> > Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>
> > As Dave posts it but he doesn't even say if he agrees with it
> > or not!
>
> There's that.

I think if Dave posted a one paragraph CHAT-GPT article and then
wrote why he agreed or disagreed with it, that would be something.
But he just cuts-and-pastes and dumps it here...

On 2024-02-26 2:26 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
> The Doctor wrote on 26/2/24 1:11 am:
>> In article <urfhc6$2b7g$11@gallifrey.nk.ca>, The Doctor
>> <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <urf0p6$1p02t$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> Idlehands wrote on 25/2/24 12:14 pm:
>>>>> On 2024-02-24 9:31 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot
>>>>>>>> themselves, and not dump it here unasked.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You
>>>>>> have actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be
>>>>>> able to do better than a piece of software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In theory...
>>>>>
>>>>> Binky is incapable of having his own "opinions", he can only
>>>>> give opinions that have been given to him by others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Case in point is his new obsession with ChatGPT and his
>>>>> "artwork" that preceded this.  I won't even start on his
>>>>> so-called "Christianity".
>>>>>
>>>>> At least ChatGPT does not make spelling mistakes, something he
>>>>> will never be able to do.
>>
>> Lying Idlehands can never tell the Truth!
>>
>>>> Here! Here!
>>>
>>> Oh?
>
> Oh!! Look out, Idlehands, "Yellow Beard Yadallee" didn't think your
> comment was worthwhile responding to .... the first time through .... so
> HAD to come back to/for you!!
>
> So an added Extra Bonus Post to add to his All Important Precious Post
> Count!!

When all one has is a Post Count, one has to do everything possible to
maintain it. Too bad he doesn't put the same effort into something that
matters.

Like English lessons.

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

In article <GZaS3yaLczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>> In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> Mickmane wrote:
>
>Aaah, those posts from xsnews still don't get here!
>
>>>> You're posting stuff you don't even know the source of.
>>>
>>> I assume Doctor Who fans are responsible for inputting that stuff,
>>> as Chat-GPT doesn't make it up.
>
>Could be Doctor Who haters, or random people who know nothing about the
>series. Could be purple tentacles posting from Pluto.
>

That the Sunmakers surpress?

>>> But with no sources quoted it just becomes irrelevant in the big
>>> scheme of things.
>
>Yep. My point exactly.
>
>>> As Dave posts it but he doesn't even say if he agrees with it or not!
>
>There's that.
>
>>>> Wait, why am I even trying to reason with you. I already know
>>>> you're completely insane.
>>>
>>> That didn't take long!!!
>
>I established that a week or two ago, I think after he posted some
>religious nuttery.
>

Whjat a nut you are.

>>>> I thought I could still just talk with you, kindly, what with you
>>>> not knowing what you're doing. But if you keep spamming this
>>>> nonsense, all that spam will be deleted on arrival, before I even
>>>> see it.
>>>
>>> We all go through that stage...
>
>Not sure, I see some people carrying on some feud, as if that would
>actually change anything. (Well, all it affects is what _they_ look
>like.)
>

Welcome aboard!

>--
>
>Mickmane
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <urhl59$2f3cq$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 26/2/24 1:03 am:
>> In article <urf0kr$1p02t$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:
>>>> In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves,
>>>>>>> and not dump it here unasked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>>>>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to
>>>>> do better than a piece of software.
>>>>>
>>>>> In theory...
>>>>
>>>> Well what about my reviews?
>>>>
>>> They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU
>>> need some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>>
>> IYIO Red-beard!
>
>Correct, "Yellow Beard Yadallee".

As I was saying about you.

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <urhl6t$2f3cq$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Idlehands wrote on 26/2/24 7:47 am:
>> On 2024-02-25 2:18 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:
>>>> In article <xn0oiglpu96moge002@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves,
>>>>>>> and not dump it here unasked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You have
>>>>> actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be able to
>>>>> do better than a piece of software.
>>>>>
>>>>> In theory...
>>>>
>>>> Well what about my reviews?
>>>>
>>> They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU
>>> need some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>>
>> "Reviews"?????
>>
>> LOLOLOL.
>>
>> A mess of badly spelled lines that "review" nothing until it hits
>> 0/10/
>

Lying Idlehands is not a Doctor Who fan!
And that is the TRuth!!

>Yeap.
>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <urhlfs$2f6gp$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 26/2/24 1:11 am:
>> In article <urfhc6$2b7g$11@gallifrey.nk.ca>, The Doctor
>> <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <urf0p6$1p02t$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> Idlehands wrote on 25/2/24 12:14 pm:
>>>>> On 2024-02-24 9:31 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot
>>>>>>>> themselves, and not dump it here unasked.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why don't you write YOUR opinions on those issues so? You
>>>>>> have actually watched Doctor Who episodes so you should be
>>>>>> able to do better than a piece of software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In theory...
>>>>>
>>>>> Binky is incapable of having his own "opinions", he can only
>>>>> give opinions that have been given to him by others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Case in point is his new obsession with ChatGPT and his
>>>>> "artwork" that preceded this. I won't even start on his
>>>>> so-called "Christianity".
>>>>>
>>>>> At least ChatGPT does not make spelling mistakes, something he
>>>>> will never be able to do.
>>
>> Lying Idlehands can never tell the Truth!

And still continues to spew lies!

>>
>>>> Here! Here!
>>>
>>> Oh?
>
>Oh!! Look out, Idlehands, "Yellow Beard Yadallee" didn't think your
>comment was worthwhile responding to .... the first time through .... so
>HAD to come back to/for you!!
>
>So an added Extra Bonus Post to add to his All Important Precious Post
>Count!!
>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0oij8pbbt6m0h005@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Mickmane wrote:
>
>> > In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> > Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>
>> > As Dave posts it but he doesn't even say if he agrees with it
>> > or not!
>>
>> There's that.
>
>I think if Dave posted a one paragraph CHAT-GPT article and then
>wrote why he agreed or disagreed with it, that would be something.
>But he just cuts-and-pastes and dumps it here...
>
>

So we can start the discussion.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 26.02.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> Mickmane wrote:
>>> In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

>>> As Dave posts it but he doesn't even say if he agrees with it
>>> or not!
>>
>> There's that.

> I think if Dave posted a one paragraph CHAT-GPT article and then
> wrote why he agreed or disagreed with it, that would be something.
> But he just cuts-and-pastes and dumps it here...

Very true.

A pile of sterile nothing. Well, I give up trying to get him to
understand that. Killfile it is.

--

Mickmane

In article <GZaSePN5czB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>On 26.02.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>> In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>
>>>> As Dave posts it but he doesn't even say if he agrees with it
>>>> or not!
>>>
>>> There's that.
>
>> I think if Dave posted a one paragraph CHAT-GPT article and then
>> wrote why he agreed or disagreed with it, that would be something.
>> But he just cuts-and-pastes and dumps it here...
>
>Very true.
>
>A pile of sterile nothing. Well, I give up trying to get him to
>understand that. Killfile it is.
>

When and cry do nothings!

>--
>
>Mickmane
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 2/26/2024 07:55, Idlehands wrote:

>
> When all one has is a Post Count, one has to do everything possible to
> maintain it.  Too bad he doesn't put the same effort into something that
> matters.
>
> Like English lessons.
>

Or his parent's internet company.

--

Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan

On 2024-02-26 7:08 p.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
> On 2/26/2024 07:55, Idlehands wrote:
>
>>
>> When all one has is a Post Count, one has to do everything possible to
>> maintain it.  Too bad he doesn't put the same effort into something
>> that matters.
>>
>> Like English lessons.
>>
>
> Or his parent's internet company.
>

That would be a good one as well.
--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

In article <hubDN.10546871$ee1.2759594@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
>On 2/26/2024 07:55, Idlehands wrote:
>
>>
>> When all one has is a Post Count, one has to do everything possible to
>> maintain it.  Too bad he doesn't put the same effort into something that
>> matters.
>>
>> Like English lessons.
>>

Lying Idlehands lies again!

>
>Or his parent's internet company.
>
>--
>
>Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
>--Carl Sagan
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 27.02.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> Mickmane wrote:
>>> In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> Mickmane wrote:

>> Aaah, those posts from xsnews still don't get here!

> Speak to your news admin...

I did, right now he's too busy with his real world job to spend time to
investigate.

(This newsserver thing is a hobby of him.)

Will have to wait until he finds time, or you just only post from
indigo. :)

--

Mickmane

The Doctor wrote on 27/2/24 2:35 am:
> In article <urhl59$2f3cq$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 26/2/24 1:03 am:
>>> In article <urf0kr$1p02t$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:

<Snip>

>>>>> Well what about my reviews?
>>>>>
>>>> They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU
>>>> need some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>>>
>>> IYIO Red-beard!
>>
>> Correct, "Yellow Beard Yadallee".
>
> As I was saying about you.

How many times, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"? *I CAN'T HEAR YOU* ,"Yellow
Beard Yadallee"?
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 27/2/24 2:36 am:
> In article <urhl6t$2f3cq$3@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Idlehands wrote on 26/2/24 7:47 am:
>>> On 2024-02-25 2:18 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:

<Snip>

>>>>> Well what about my reviews?
>>>>>
>>>> They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU
>>>> need some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>>>
>>> "Reviews"?????
>>>
>>> LOLOLOL.
>>>
>>> A mess of badly spelled lines that "review" nothing until it hits
>>> 0/10/
>
> Lying Idlehands is not a Doctor Who fan!
> And that is the TRuth!!

With all the GARBAGE YOU post, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", how can WE
believe ANYTHING YOU post is the 'TRuth', "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??
--
Daniel

Idlehands wrote on 27/2/24 12:55 am:
> On 2024-02-26 2:26 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:

<Snip>

>> So an added Extra Bonus Post to add to his All Important Precious
>> Post Count!!
>
> When all one has is a Post Count, one has to do everything possible
> to maintain it. Too bad he doesn't put the same effort into
> something that matters.
>
> Like English lessons.
>
Is 'SPELLING' included as part of 'English' ... or is it a subject all
on its own now-a-days??
--
Daniel

Mickmane wrote on 26/2/24 8:09 pm:
>> In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> Mickmane wrote:
>
> Aaah, those posts from xsnews still don't get here!
>
>>>> You're posting stuff you don't even know the source of.
>>>
>>> I assume Doctor Who fans are responsible for inputting that stuff,
>>> as Chat-GPT doesn't make it up.
>
> Could be Doctor Who haters, or random people who know nothing about the
> series. Could be purple tentacles posting from Pluto.

Isn't Chat-GPT an 'AI' computer program thinkee where you give it a few
basic ideas/suggestion and a required Document length (i.e. Word count)
and IT spits out the end product??
--
Daniel

On 2024-02-27 2:30 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
> Idlehands wrote on 27/2/24 12:55 am:
>> On 2024-02-26 2:26 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
>>> So an added Extra Bonus Post to add to his All Important Precious
>>> Post Count!!
>>
>> When all one has is a Post Count, one has to do everything possible
>> to maintain it.  Too bad he doesn't put the same effort into
>> something that matters.
>>
>> Like English lessons.
>>
> Is 'SPELLING' included as part of 'English' ... or is it a subject all
> on its own now-a-days??

Still part of the lessons, unless it's ESL classes, he could use both.

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

On 2024-02-27 2:26 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
> The Doctor wrote on 27/2/24 2:36 am:
>> In article <urhl6t$2f3cq$3@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel65  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> Idlehands wrote on 26/2/24 7:47 am:
>>>> On 2024-02-25 2:18 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 9:46 am:
>
> <Snip>
>
>>>>>> Well what about my reviews?
>>>>>>
>>>>> They, IMHO, are BLOODY HOPELESS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", so YOU
>>>>> need some practise, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>>>>
>>>> "Reviews"?????
>>>>
>>>> LOLOLOL.
>>>>
>>>> A mess of badly spelled lines that "review" nothing until it hits
>>>> 0/10/
>>
>> Lying Idlehands is not a Doctor Who fan!
>> And that is the TRuth!!
>
> With all the GARBAGE YOU post, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", how can WE
> believe ANYTHING YOU post is the 'TRuth', "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??

Poor binky, just keep telling yourself these lies asswipe if they help
you sleep at night.

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw