It just makes too much sense.

Tim typed:

> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 9:06:21 AM UTC-7, Clem wrote:
>> It just makes too much sense.
>
> When did they marry?
>

Before they divorced.

--
solar penguin

On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 12:26:41 PM UTC-4, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 9:06:21 AM UTC-7, Clem wrote:
> > It just makes too much sense.
> When did they marry?
I would assume on Gallifrey; though now I type it out, marriage does seem pretty un-Gallifreyan. Maybe they snuck off to some other planet when they were both rebellious 200-somethings.

Clem

During their Academy days, naturally.

They told me themselves. Also, I think it makes all their interactions 10x funnier.

Point out where specifically in the 3rd Doctor's era he said, "The Master and I are not divorced."

Binky bleated:

> In article <437ed46f-bfb3-42dd-845c-b28fcb173712n@googlegroups.com>,
> Clem <blorbofrommyshows69@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Point out where specifically in the 3rd Doctor's era
>> he said, "The Master and I are not divorced."
>
> They refer to being at the academy almost at the same
> time.

So they could’ve married while they were there.

--
solar penguin

After they realized their tempestuous + volatile relationship was destroying them both :/.

Binky bleated:

> In article <t1qdco$rov$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <437ed46f-bfb3-42dd-845c-b28fcb173712n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> Clem <blorbofrommyshows69@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Point out where specifically in the 3rd Doctor's era
>>>> he said, "The Master and I are not divorced."
>>>
>>> They refer to being at the academy almost at the same
>>> time.
>>
>> So they could’ve married while they were there.
>>
>
> Doubtful.
>

Why? What’s doubtful about it?

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t1rgaq$6tf$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t1qdco$rov$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <437ed46f-bfb3-42dd-845c-b28fcb173712n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> Clem <blorbofrommyshows69@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Point out where specifically in the 3rd Doctor's era
>>>>>> he said, "The Master and I are not divorced."
>>>>>
>>>>> They refer to being at the academy almost at the same
>>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>> So they could’ve married while they were there.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Doubtful.
>>>
>>
>> Why? What’s doubtful about it?
>>
>
> The whole Chibnall effect is!
>

Liar! This has nothing to do with Chibnall!

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <11687fe3-2290-40cc-a122-2bcf90d082c6n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbrueni264@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 10:16:13 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>> Binky bleated:
>>>> In article <t1qdco$rov$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <437ed46f-bfb3-42dd...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> Clem <blorbofro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Point out where specifically in the 3rd Doctor's era
>>>>>>> he said, "The Master and I are not divorced."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They refer to being at the academy almost at the same
>>>>>> time.
>>>>>
>>>>> So they could’ve married while they were there.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Doubtful.
>>>>
>>> Why? What’s doubtful about it?
>>
>> Maybe Yads thinks that the Academy had a "No Marriage"
>> rule!
>
> Not for same sex!

So, you think the Academy didn’t have a “No Marriage”
rule for the same sex? OK. Were the Master and the Doctor
the same sex at the time?

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 29/3/22 9:32 am:
> In article <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <11687fe3-2290-40cc-a122-2bcf90d082c6n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbrueni264@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 10:16:13 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>> In article <t1qdco$rov$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <437ed46f-bfb3-42dd...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>> Clem <blorbofro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Point out where specifically in the 3rd Doctor's era
>>>>>>>>> he said, "The Master and I are not divorced."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They refer to being at the academy almost at the same
>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So they could’ve married while they were there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doubtful.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why? What’s doubtful about it?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe Yads thinks that the Academy had a "No Marriage"
>>>> rule!
>>>
>>> Not for same sex!
>>
>> So, you think the Academy didn’t have a “No Marriage”
>> rule for the same sex? OK. Were the Master and the Doctor
>> the same sex at the time?
>>
>
> SP , you must denounce the Timeless child !!

WHY must Solar Penguin, clown?? Can't Solar Penguin have a opinion of
his own, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 29/3/22 9:40 am:
> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 6:38:46 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> In article <c69b4563-8144-4703...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 9:06:21 AM UTC-7, Clem wrote:
>>>> It just makes too much sense.
>>>
>>> Is the thread title breaking news?
>> You really are dense Tim!
>
> The thread title was exclaiming

The thread title was asking a question, .... hence the '???'.

> about the divorce of the Doctor and the Master as if that news had
> just broken? The thread title was clearly astonished at that turn of
> events!
--
Daniel

On 2022-03-29 4:54 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
> The Doctor wrote on 29/3/22 9:32 am:
>> In article <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Binky bleated:
>>>
>>>> In article <11687fe3-2290-40cc-a122-2bcf90d082c6n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbrueni264@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 10:16:13 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>> In article <t1qdco$rov$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <437ed46f-bfb3-42dd...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>> Clem <blorbofro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Point out where specifically in the 3rd Doctor's era
>>>>>>>>>> he said, "The Master and I are not divorced."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They refer to being at the academy almost at the same
>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So they could’ve married while they were there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Doubtful.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why? What’s doubtful about it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe Yads thinks that the Academy had a "No Marriage"
>>>>> rule!
>>>>
>>>> Not for same sex!
>>>
>>> So, you think the Academy didn’t have a “No Marriage”
>>> rule for the same sex? OK. Were the Master and the Doctor
>>> the same sex at the time?
>>>
>>
>> SP , you must denounce the Timeless child !!
>
> WHY must Solar Penguin, clown?? Can't Solar Penguin have a opinion of
> his own, clown??
>

Binky needs more sheep to join him so he doesn't feel all alone. He
loves to beak off about 1984 but then insults anyone who doesn't "think"
like he does.

He is just not that bright, no matter what his mummy says.

--
The very powerful and very stupid have one thing in common. They don't
alter their views to match the facts.

They alter the facts to match their views.

Doctor Who The Face of Evil, Part 4, January 22, 1977
(Binky couldn't name the episode)

Binky bleated:

> In article <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <11687fe3-2290-40cc-a122-2bcf90d082c6n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbrueni264@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 10:16:13 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>> In article <t1qdco$rov$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <437ed46f-bfb3-42dd...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>> Clem <blorbofro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Point out where specifically in the 3rd Doctor's era
>>>>>>>>> he said, "The Master and I are not divorced."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They refer to being at the academy almost at the same
>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So they could’ve married while they were there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doubtful.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why? What’s doubtful about it?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe Yads thinks that the Academy had a "No Marriage"
>>>> rule!
>>>
>>> Not for same sex!
>>
>> So, you think the Academy didn’t have a “No Marriage”
>> rule for the same sex? OK. Were the Master and the Doctor
>> the same sex at the time?
>>
>
> SP , you must denounce the Timeless child !!
>

I didn’t even mention the Timeless Child! It’s got nothing
to do with whether or not the Master was ever female
in the Academy.

DOCTOR: Yeah, I think she was a man back then. I'm fairly
sure that I was too. It was a long time ago, though.
- http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/36-11.html

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t1v55o$rto$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <11687fe3-2290-40cc-a122-2bcf90d082c6n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbrueni264@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe Yads thinks that the Academy had a "No
>>>>>> Marriage" rule!
>>>>>
>>>>> Not for same sex!
>>>>
>>>> So, you think the Academy didn’t have a “No Marriage”
>>>> rule for the same sex? OK. Were the Master and
>>>> the Doctor the same sex at the time?
>>>>
>>>
>>> SP , you must denounce the Timeless child !!
>>>
>>
>> I didn’t even mention the Timeless Child! It’s got nothing
>> to do with whether or not the Master was ever female
>> in the Academy.
>>
>> DOCTOR: Yeah, I think she was a man back then. I'm fairly
>> sure that I was too. It was a long time ago, though.
>> - http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/36-11.html
>>
>
> Exactly why you need to denoune the Timeless Child, SP!
>

Eh? What? Pardon? Sorry?

That was a line from an Moffat episode from seasons before
Chibnall ever mentioned the Timeless Child!

OTOH if by “denoune” you mean “say that Moffat’s original
version of a pre-Hartnell female Doctor might’ve been
better than Chibnall’s reinterpretation of the idea,” then
yes, I’ll happily denoune away with the best of them.

--
solar penguin

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 30/03/2022 2:53 am:
> On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 4:53:23 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 29/3/22 9:40 am:
>>> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 6:38:46 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> In article <c69b4563-8144-4703...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 9:06:21 AM UTC-7, Clem wrote:
>>>>>> It just makes too much sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the thread title breaking news?
>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>
>>> The thread title was exclaiming
>> The thread title was asking a question, .... hence the '???'.
>
> What prompted the thread title to ask the question?

Not 'What', Tim, but 'Who' and the answer to that question is 'Whoever
started this thread, Tim.'.
--
Daniel

Binky bleated:

> In article <t20tbt$7ov$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t1v55o$rto$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <11687fe3-2290-40cc-a122-2bcf90d082c6n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbrueni264@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe Yads thinks that the Academy had a "No
>>>>>>>> Marriage" rule!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not for same sex!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, you think the Academy didn’t have a “No Marriage”
>>>>>> rule for the same sex? OK. Were the Master and
>>>>>> the Doctor the same sex at the time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> SP , you must denounce the Timeless child !!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I didn’t even mention the Timeless Child! It’s got nothing
>>>> to do with whether or not the Master was ever female
>>>> in the Academy.
>>>>
>>>> DOCTOR: Yeah, I think she was a man back then. I'm fairly
>>>> sure that I was too. It was a long time ago, though.
>>>> - http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/36-11.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> Exactly why you need to denounce the Timeless Child, SP!
>>>

Liar! That’s not what you posted! Apologise!

>>
>> Eh? What? Pardon? Sorry?
>>
>> That was a line from an Moffat episode from seasons before
>> Chibnall ever mentioned the Timeless Child!
>>
>> OTOH if by “denounce” you mean “say that Moffat’s original
>> version of a pre-Hartnell female Doctor might’ve been
>> better than Chibnall’s reinterpretation of the idea,” then
>> yes, I’ll happily denounce away with the best of them.

Liar! That’s not what I replied! Apologise!

>
> The sooner the Timelss Child is retconed, the Better!
>

So, you would be happy to see Chibnall’s Timeless Child
replaced with Moffat’s original version of the pre-Hartnell
female Doctor instead? And maybe even married to the
Master?

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t21nfc$79q$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t20tbt$7ov$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t1v55o$rto$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <11687fe3-2290-40cc-a122-2bcf90d082c6n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbrueni264@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe Yads thinks that the Academy had a "No
>>>>>>>>>> Marriage" rule!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not for same sex!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, you think the Academy didn’t have a “No Marriage”
>>>>>>>> rule for the same sex? OK. Were the Master and
>>>>>>>> the Doctor the same sex at the time?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SP , you must denounce the Timeless child !!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn’t even mention the Timeless Child! It’s got nothing
>>>>>> to do with whether or not the Master was ever female
>>>>>> in the Academy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DOCTOR: Yeah, I think she was a man back then. I'm fairly
>>>>>> sure that I was too. It was a long time ago, though.
>>>>>> - http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/36-11.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly why you need to denounce the Timeless Child, SP!
>>>>>
>>
>> Liar! That’s not what you posted! Apologise!
>>

Once again, you failed to apologise.

>>>>
>>>> Eh? What? Pardon? Sorry?
>>>>
>>>> That was a line from an Moffat episode from seasons before
>>>> Chibnall ever mentioned the Timeless Child!
>>>>
>>>> OTOH if by “denounce” you mean “say that Moffat’s original
>>>> version of a pre-Hartnell female Doctor might’ve been
>>>> better than Chibnall’s reinterpretation of the idea,” then
>>>> yes, I’ll happily denounce away with the best of them.
>>
>> Liar! That’s not what I replied! Apologise!
>>

And again. Why am I not suprised.

>>>
>>> The sooner the Timelss Child is retconed, the Better!
>>>
>>
>> So, you would be happy to see Chibnall’s Timeless Child
>> replaced with Moffat’s original version of the pre-Hartnell
>> female Doctor instead? And maybe even married to the
>> Master?
>>
>
> I am one of the female pre-Hartnell Doctors!!

If you can edit my posts without apology, then I can edit
yours. So there!

--
solar penguin

That's for me to know and for you to lose sleep over.

No. I'm a Lungbarrow believer, unfortunately.

All of them, if you know what to look for. Start by watching part 2 of the King's Demons backwards while standing on your head, and everything will become clear.

The Doctor wrote on 31/3/22 9:08 am:
> In article <0c01fa9d-1219-4c06-a377-ab4ff1aa572dn@googlegroups.com>,
> Clem <blorbofrommyshows69@gmail.com> wrote:
>> All of them, if you know what to look for. Start by watching part 2 of
>> the King's Demons backwards while standing on your head, and everything
>> will become clear.
>
> Troll.

Hmm! Could this be a case of "It takes one to know one!!"??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 31/3/22 5:12 am:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 4:46:50 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 30/03/2022 2:53 am:
>>> On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 4:53:23 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 29/3/22 9:40 am:
>>>>> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 6:38:46 AM UTC-7,
>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> In article <c69b4563-8144-4703...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 9:06:21 AM UTC-7, Clem
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> It just makes too much sense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the thread title breaking news?
>>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>
>>>>> The thread title was exclaiming
>>>> The thread title was asking a question, .... hence the '???'.
>>>
>>> What prompted the thread title to ask the question?
>> Not 'What', Tim, but 'Who' and the answer to that question is
>> 'Whoever started this thread, Tim.'.
>
> What prompted Clem to ask the question Re the Master and Doctor
> getting divorced?

Tim, you ask a lot of Questions here.

Who prompts YOU to ask those questions, Tim??
--
Daniel

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t243os$30uv$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <0a5cf7f5-aa61-459d-8a15-1f256512351cn@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbrueni264@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 3:29:54 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 31/3/22 5:12 am:
>>> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 4:46:50 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> >> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 30/03/2022 2:53 am:
>>> >>> On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 4:53:23 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> >>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 29/3/22 9:40 am:
>>> >>>>> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 6:38:46 AM UTC-7,
>>> >>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> >>>>>> In article <c69b4563-8144-4703...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> >>>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>> On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 9:06:21 AM UTC-7, Clem
>>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>> It just makes too much sense.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Is the thread title breaking news?
>>> >>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> The thread title was exclaiming
>>> >>>> The thread title was asking a question, .... hence the '???'.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> What prompted the thread title to ask the question?
>>> >> Not 'What', Tim, but 'Who' and the answer to that question is
>>> >> 'Whoever started this thread, Tim.'.
>>> >
>>> > What prompted Clem to ask the question Re the Master and Doctor
>>> > getting divorced?
>>> Tim, you ask a lot of Questions here.
>>>
>>> Who prompts YOU to ask those questions, Tim??
>>
>>Curiousity.
>
> Your own, then!

Whose curiosity do you think he should be using, Yads?