tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 11:30:00 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>> Binky bleated:
>>>
>>> You saying the doctor and the MAster in a same-sex
>>> relationship: Gross indecency!
>>>
>> Even if that were gross indecency _I DIDN’T SAY IT!!!_
>
> I think that Yads thinks that you SHOULD consider same
> sex relationships to be indecent!
>

But _I DIDN’T SAY THERE WAS A SAME SEX RELATIONSHIP!!!_

Whether they’re indecent or not (they’re not) is irrelevant
because _I DIDN’T SAY IT!!!_

Binky is lying about what I said. That is the real issue here.

--
solar penguin

Tim typed:

> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 11:30:00 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>
>> As far as I’m concerned we just plain don’t know what
>> sexes they were. One or both of them could’ve been a
>> different sex.
>
> Might Gallifreyans have more than two genders?
>

We just don’t know.

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 4/4/22 1:42 pm:
> In article <2b950ab5-e8da-4bff-9ca6-2ba55c2f0b42n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:33:23 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> In article <471945f3-74b5-469f...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 12:06:00 PM UTC-7,
>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> In article <c9a58951-d893-48cc...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 4:14:57 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <be40bf49-80fb-40cb...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>>>> Who is accusing you of flaming solar penguin?
>>>>>>> How dense are you Tim?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You asked why you should flame SP for your opinions!
>>>>> Blame/flame - interchangeable.
>>>>
>>>> You can't cook with a blame.
>>> It is called crisping the meal.
>>
>> How does verbal criticism literally cook meat?
>
> You really are dense Tim.

If YOU, clown, are the one that's always stuffing up, clown, how does
that make Tim 'dense', clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t2ev5r$itp$33@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t2e68v$gfl$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Tim typed:
>>
>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 11:30:00 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As far as I�?Tm concerned we just plain don�?Tt know what
>>>> sexes they were. One or both of them could�?Tve been a
>>>> different sex.
>>>
>>> Might Gallifreyans have more than two genders?
>>>
>>
>>We just don�?Tt know.
>>
>
> Time Lords, Time Ladies, Time Tots ....

A tot is a young child. You think it's a separate gender? You're weird,
Yads.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t2f1mj$2e3s$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t2f19d$1vo$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t2ev5r$itp$33@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t2e68v$gfl$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Tim typed:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 11:30:00 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I�?Tm concerned we just plain don�?Tt know what
>>>>>> sexes they were. One or both of them could�?Tve been a
>>>>>> different sex.
>>>>>
>>>>> Might Gallifreyans have more than two genders?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>We just don�?Tt know.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Time Lords, Time Ladies, Time Tots ....
>>
>>A tot is a young child. You think it's a separate gender? You're weird,
>>Yads.
>>
>>
>
> You really forgot the 4th and 5th Doctor eras then SW.

No Yads, I didn't.

Binky bleated:

> In article <t2e635$f5r$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 11:30:00 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>
>>>>> You saying the doctor and the MAster in a same-sex
>>>>> relationship: Gross indecency!
>>>>>
>>>> Even if that were gross indecency _I DIDN’T SAY IT!!!_
>>>
>>> I think that Yads thinks that you SHOULD consider same
>>> sex relationships to be indecent!
>>>
>>
>> But _I DIDN’T SAY THERE WAS A SAME SEX RELATIONSHIP!!!_
>>
>> Whether they’re indecent or not (they’re not) is irrelevant
>> because _I DIDN’T SAY IT!!!_
>>
>> Binky is lying about what I said. That is the real issue here.
>>
>
> Still spinning Birdie?
>

Prove it. Go on, prove it.

If you can show me a post where I said the Doctor and
the Master were definitely in a same sex romance during
their academy days, then I’ll admit that you didn’t lie. Well,
didn’t lie about this anyway.

(I still won’t agree that same sex relationships are indecent,
but that’s another matter. One thing at a time.)

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t2f6b3$eto$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t2e635$f5r$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that Yads thinks that you SHOULD consider
>>>>> same sex relationships to be indecent!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But _I DIDN’T SAY THERE WAS A SAME SEX RELATIONSHIP!!!_
>>>>
>>>> Whether they’re indecent or not (they’re not) is irrelevant
>>>> because _I DIDN’T SAY IT!!!_
>>>>
>>>> Binky is lying about what I said. That is the real issue here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Still spinning Birdie?
>>>
>>
>> Prove it. Go on, prove it.
>>
>> If you can show me a post where I said the Doctor and
>> the Master were definitely in a same sex romance during
>> their academy days, then I’ll admit that you didn’t lie. Well,
>> didn’t lie about this anyway.
>>
>> (I still won’t agree that same sex relationships are indecent,
>> but that’s another matter. One thing at a time.)
>
> That is the key.
>

So you accept that I _didn’t say_ that the Master and the
Doctor were definitely the same sex?

Good.

Now apologise for misrepresenting what I said.

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t2fmgu$mve$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t2f6b3$eto$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t2e635$f5r$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that Yads thinks that you SHOULD consider
>>>>>>> same sex relationships to be indecent!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But _I DIDN’T SAY THERE WAS A SAME SEX RELATIONSHIP!!!_
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whether they’re indecent or not (they’re not) is irrelevant
>>>>>> because _I DIDN’T SAY IT!!!_
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky is lying about what I said. That is the real issue here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still spinning Birdie?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Prove it. Go on, prove it.
>>>>
>>>> If you can show me a post where I said the Doctor and
>>>> the Master were definitely in a same sex romance during
>>>> their academy days, then I’ll admit that you didn’t lie. Well,
>>>> didn’t lie about this anyway.
>>>>
>>>> (I still won’t agree that same sex relationships are indecent,
>>>> but that’s another matter. One thing at a time.)
>>>
>>> That is the key.
>>>
>>
>> So you accept that I _didn’t say_ that the Master and the
>> Doctor were definitely the same sex?
>>
>> Good.
>>
>> Now apologise for misrepresenting what I said.
>
> That is something I never did.
>

Liar! You repeatedly insisted I was ‘grossly indecent’ for
saying the Doctor and the Master were in a same sex relationship.
Even though I had said no such thing.

Any normal person would apologise for something like
that.

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t2gfn5$t86$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t2fmgu$mve$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So you accept that I _didn’t say_ that the Master and the
>>>> Doctor were definitely the same sex?
>>>>
>>>> Good.
>>>>
>>>> Now apologise for misrepresenting what I said.
>>>
>>> That is something I never did.
>>>
>>
>> Liar! You repeatedly insisted I was ‘grossly indecent’ for
>> saying the Doctor and the Master were in a same sex relationship.
>> Even though I had said no such thing.
>>
>> Any normal person would apologise for something like
>> that.
>>
>
> Prove that you never said that.
>

How do you expect me to prove a negative?

I never said it in this thread, as you can see for yourself
if you look back through it.

More specifically I made a post on Mon, 28 Mar 2022 21:58:34
-0000 (UTC), Message-Id: <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
in which I first specifically questioned whether or not they
were the same sex. (You must’ve seen and read that post
because you responded to it.)

On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:30:16 -0000 (UTC) I made a post,
Message-Id: <t1v55o$rto$1@dont-email.me>, quoting
a line from a Moffat episode confirming that there’s a canonical
possibility that one of them might not have been male. (Again, you read and
replied to this.)

I later made several other posts in this same thread again
making the point that we don’t know what sexes the Doctor
and Master were. You saw and responded to these too. (I can find details of
these posts too if you like, though
as a system admin, you should be able to do that more
efficiently than me.)

Is that proof enough for you?

Now, apologise!

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 5/4/22 12:53 am:
> In article <t2eujd$4rc$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 4/4/22 1:42 pm:
>>> In article <2b950ab5-e8da-4bff-9ca6-2ba55c2f0b42n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:33:23 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> In article <471945f3-74b5-469f...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 12:06:00 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <c9a58951-d893-48cc...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 4:14:57 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <be40bf49-80fb-40cb...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who is accusing you of flaming solar penguin?
>>>>>>>>> How dense are you Tim?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You asked why you should flame SP for your opinions!
>>>>>>> Blame/flame - interchangeable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can't cook with a blame.
>>>>> It is called crisping the meal.
>>>>
>>>> How does verbal criticism literally cook meat?
>>>
>>> You really are dense Tim.
>>
>> If YOU, clown, are the one that's always stuffing up, clown, how does
>> that make Tim 'dense', clown??

> Are you suffering from Tim's dissease, Dannyboy?

Yet to be proven that Tim suffers from any disease, clown. YOU, on the
other hand, clown, ......!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 5/4/22 2:26 pm:
> In article <t2gfn5$t86$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>> Liar! You repeatedly insisted I was ‘grossly indecent’ for
>> saying the Doctor and the Master were in a same sex relationship.
>> Even though I had said no such thing.
>>
>> Any normal person would apologise for something like
>> that.
>
> Prove that you never said that.

AH!! Good!! Proving a *negative* !! But still, at least that means YOU,
clown, don't have to *PROVE* anything that YOU, clown, post!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 5/4/22 12:17 am:
> In article <t2e395$snq$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> You saying the doctor and the MAster in a same-sex
>>> relationship: Gross indecency!
>>
>> Even if that were gross indecency _I DIDN’T SAY IT!!!_
>>
>> _YOU_ are the one who says they were the same sex.
>> _I DIDN’T SAY IT!!!_
>>
>> As far as I’m concerned we just plain don’t know what
>> sexes they were. One or both of them could’ve been a
>> different sex.
>
> I have my doubts! The cHibnall corruption is getting to you SP!

So what is getting to YOU, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

On 2022-04-04 5:22 p.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <t2fmgu$mve$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t2f6b3$eto$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t2e635$f5r$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that Yads thinks that you SHOULD consider
>>>>>>> same sex relationships to be indecent!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But _I DIDN’T SAY THERE WAS A SAME SEX RELATIONSHIP!!!_
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whether they’re indecent or not (they’re not) is irrelevant
>>>>>> because _I DIDN’T SAY IT!!!_
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky is lying about what I said. That is the real issue here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still spinning Birdie?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Prove it. Go on, prove it.
>>>>
>>>> If you can show me a post where I said the Doctor and
>>>> the Master were definitely in a same sex romance during
>>>> their academy days, then I’ll admit that you didn’t lie. Well,
>>>> didn’t lie about this anyway.
>>>>
>>>> (I still won’t agree that same sex relationships are indecent,
>>>> but that’s another matter. One thing at a time.)
>>>
>>> That is the key.
>>>
>>
>> So you accept that I _didn’t say_ that the Master and the
>> Doctor were definitely the same sex?
>>
>> Good.
>>
>> Now apologise for misrepresenting what I said.
>
> That is something I never did.
>

In other words SP is right and you, as per usual, are full of shit. You
live a pathetic life binky and it shows in every post.

--
The very powerful and very stupid have one thing in common. They don't
alter their views to match the facts.

They alter the facts to match their views.

Doctor Who The Face of Evil, Part 4, January 22, 1977
(Binky couldn't name the episode)

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t2gi6t$6cf$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t2gfn5$t86$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t2fmgu$mve$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you accept that I _didn’t say_ that the Master and the
>>>>>> Doctor were definitely the same sex?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now apologise for misrepresenting what I said.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is something I never did.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Liar! You repeatedly insisted I was ‘grossly indecent’ for
>>>> saying the Doctor and the Master were in a same sex relationship.
>>>> Even though I had said no such thing.
>>>>
>>>> Any normal person would apologise for something like
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Prove that you never said that.
>>>
>>
>> How do you expect me to prove a negative?
>>
>> I never said it in this thread, as you can see for yourself
>> if you look back through it.
>>
>> More specifically I made a post on Mon, 28 Mar 2022 21:58:34
>> -0000 (UTC), Message-Id: <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
>> in which I first specifically questioned whether or not they
>> were the same sex. (You must’ve seen and read that post
>> because you responded to it.)
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:30:16 -0000 (UTC) I made a post,
>> Message-Id: <t1v55o$rto$1@dont-email.me>, quoting
>> a line from a Moffat episode confirming that there’s a canonical
>> possibility that one of them might not have been male. (Again, you read and
>> replied to this.)
>>
>> I later made several other posts in this same thread again
>> making the point that we don’t know what sexes the Doctor
>> and Master were. You saw and responded to these too. (I can find details of
>> these posts too if you like, though
>> as a system admin, you should be able to do that more
>> efficiently than me.)
>>
>> Is that proof enough for you?
>>
>> Now, apologise!
>>
>
> Sorry for mixing you up with Clem.
>
> I thought you were backing Clem.
>

My position is, the Doctor and Master were probably lovers
and may even have been married, but they weren’t necessarily
the same sex at the time.

I don’t know how this fits with Clem’s theory.

--
solar penguin

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t2gi6t$6cf$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>>
>>> Prove that you never said that.
>>>
>>
>> How do you expect me to prove a negative?
>>
>> I never said it in this thread, as you can see for yourself
>> if you look back through it.
>>
>> More specifically I made a post on Mon, 28 Mar 2022 21:58:34
>> -0000 (UTC), Message-Id: <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
>> in which I first specifically questioned whether or not they
>> were the same sex. (You must’ve seen and read that post
>> because you responded to it.)
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:30:16 -0000 (UTC) I made a post,
>> Message-Id: <t1v55o$rto$1@dont-email.me>, quoting
>> a line from a Moffat episode confirming that there’s a canonical
>> possibility that one of them might not have been male. (Again, you read and
>> replied to this.)
>>
>> I later made several other posts in this same thread again
>> making the point that we don’t know what sexes the Doctor
>> and Master were. You saw and responded to these too. (I can find details of
>> these posts too if you like, though
>> as a system admin, you should be able to do that more
>> efficiently than me.)
>>
>> Is that proof enough for you?
>>
>> Now, apologise!
>>
>
> Sorry for mixing you up with Clem.
>
> I thought you were backing Clem.
>

Finally! Thank you!

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t2hj46$pbd$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Sorry for mixing you up with Clem.
>>>
>>> I thought you were backing Clem.
>>>
>>
>>
>> My position is, the Doctor and Master were probably
>> lovers and may even have been married, but they weren’t
>> necessarily the same sex at the time.
>>
>> I don’t know how this fits with Clem’s theory.
>>
>
> Unlike the PWenger interference, the Doctor and the
> MAster were male.
>

Gibberish

--
solar penguin

"solar penguin" <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:t2hj46$pbd$1@dont-email.me...
>
> My position is, the Doctor and Master were probably lovers
> and may even have been married, but they weren't necessarily
> the same sex at the time.
>
> I don't know how this fits with Clem's theory.

I think one of the authors of some of the books (David McIntee) implied that
the Master was called Koschei. Not sure, but I think he might have come up
with an idea that the Master and the Doctor were actually brothers...

On 2022-04-05 8:26 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <t2hj6i$pum$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t2gi6t$6cf$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Prove that you never said that.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do you expect me to prove a negative?
>>>>
>>>> I never said it in this thread, as you can see for yourself
>>>> if you look back through it.
>>>>
>>>> More specifically I made a post on Mon, 28 Mar 2022 21:58:34
>>>> -0000 (UTC), Message-Id: <t1tb2a$acp$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> in which I first specifically questioned whether or not they
>>>> were the same sex. (You must’ve seen and read that post
>>>> because you responded to it.)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:30:16 -0000 (UTC) I made a post,
>>>> Message-Id: <t1v55o$rto$1@dont-email.me>, quoting
>>>> a line from a Moffat episode confirming that there’s a canonical
>>>> possibility that one of them might not have been male. (Again, you read and
>>>> replied to this.)
>>>>
>>>> I later made several other posts in this same thread again
>>>> making the point that we don’t know what sexes the Doctor
>>>> and Master were. You saw and responded to these too. (I can find details of
>>>> these posts too if you like, though
>>>> as a system admin, you should be able to do that more
>>>> efficiently than me.)
>>>>
>>>> Is that proof enough for you?
>>>>
>>>> Now, apologise!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry for mixing you up with Clem.
>>>
>>> I thought you were backing Clem.
>>>
>>
>> Finally! Thank you!
>>
>
> Hey bird, some newcomers might be trolling.
>
> I still need to raise an anti-TimBruening Force.
>
> He has been run out of other newgroups.
>

Dear sweet lord, who do you think you are? Here's a thought, stop
responding every single one of Tim's posts. If you take away the
attention you take away Tim.

Of course your beloved post count would match AIOE stats and that would
be a good thing.

Oh and stop making asinine accusations against others.

--
The very powerful and very stupid have one thing in common. They don't
alter their views to match the facts.

They alter the facts to match their views.

Doctor Who The Face of Evil, Part 4, January 22, 1977
(Binky couldn't name the episode)

The Doctor wrote on 6/04/2022 12:17 am:
> In article <t2har7$2v4$4@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 5/4/22 12:53 am:
>>> In article <t2eujd$4rc$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 4/4/22 1:42 pm:
>>>>> In article <2b950ab5-e8da-4bff-9ca6-2ba55c2f0b42n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:33:23 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <471945f3-74b5-469f...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 12:06:00 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <c9a58951-d893-48cc...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 4:14:57 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <be40bf49-80fb-40cb...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is accusing you of flaming solar penguin?
>>>>>>>>>>> How dense are you Tim?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You asked why you should flame SP for your opinions!
>>>>>>>>> Blame/flame - interchangeable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can't cook with a blame.
>>>>>>> It is called crisping the meal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does verbal criticism literally cook meat?
>>>>>
>>>>> You really are dense Tim.
>>>>
>>>> If YOU, clown, are the one that's always stuffing up, clown, how does
>>>> that make Tim 'dense', clown??
>>
>>
>>> Are you suffering from Tim's dissease, Dannyboy?
>>
>> Yet to be proven that Tim suffers from any disease, clown. YOU, on the
>> other hand, clown, ......!!

> spamtrolling is a diseaes, Dannyboy!

Well, YOU, clown, would know ALL about that, wouldn't YOU, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

solar penguin wrote on 6/04/2022 5:20 am:
> Binky bleated:
>> In article <t2hj46$pbd$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for mixing you up with Clem.
>>>>
>>>> I thought you were backing Clem.
>>>
>>> My position is, the Doctor and Master were probably
>>> lovers and may even have been married, but they weren’t
>>> necessarily the same sex at the time.
>>>
>>> I don’t know how this fits with Clem’s theory.
>>
>> Unlike the PWenger interference, the Doctor and the
>> MAster were male.
>
> Gibberish

I was wondering how or why 'PWenger' got into this discussion, myself,
..... but then we are dealing with the clown!!
--
Daniel

The Other Doctor wrote on 6/04/2022 7:17 am:
> "solar penguin" <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:t2hj46$pbd$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> My position is, the Doctor and Master were probably lovers and may
>> even have been married, but they weren't necessarily the same sex
>> at the time.
>>
>> I don't know how this fits with Clem's theory.
>
> I think one of the authors of some of the books (David McIntee)
> implied that the Master was called Koschei. Not sure, but I think he
> might have come up with an idea that the Master and the Doctor were
> actually brothers...

I don't know about 'David McIntee' but I've heard the "Doctor and Master
are Brothers" theory before, a long time ago!
--
Daniel

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t2igln$1ped$21@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t2ibjh$ue1$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"solar penguin" <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:t2hj46$pbd$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> My position is, the Doctor and Master were probably lovers
>>> and may even have been married, but they weren't necessarily
>>> the same sex at the time.
>>>
>>> I don't know how this fits with Clem's theory.
>>
>>I think one of the authors of some of the books (David McIntee) implied
>>that
>>the Master was called Koschei. Not sure, but I think he might have come up
>>with an idea that the Master and the Doctor were actually brothers...
>>
>>
>
> I thought RTD retconned the 8DAs.

So what?

Binky bleated:

> In article <t2ibjh$ue1$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think one of the authors of some of the books (David McIntee)
>> implied that the Master was called Koschei. Not sure, but
>> I think he might have come up with an idea that the Master
>> and the Doctor were actually brothers...
>>
>>
>
> I thought RTD retconned the 8DAs.

The Dark Path was an MA, not an 8DA

--
solar penguin

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t2k5ap$u12$45@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t2jgdk$2fo$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t2igln$1ped$21@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t2ibjh$ue1$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"solar penguin" <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:t2hj46$pbd$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>> My position is, the Doctor and Master were probably lovers
>>>>> and may even have been married, but they weren't necessarily
>>>>> the same sex at the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know how this fits with Clem's theory.
>>>>
>>>>I think one of the authors of some of the books (David McIntee) implied
>>>>that
>>>>the Master was called Koschei. Not sure, but I think he might have come
>>>>up
>>>>with an idea that the Master and the Doctor were actually brothers...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I thought RTD retconned the 8DAs.
>>
>>So what?
>>
>>
>
> So goodbye Ancestor Cell!

I've no idea what you're talking about, Yads. David McIntee didn't write the
Ancestor Cell. And the idea that the Doctor and the Master were brothers has
got nothing to do with the Ancestor Cell either.

There's a rumour that the idea goes all the way back to the time of Pertwee
and Delagado. The only reason the story was never written is because of
Delgado's unfortunate death.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t2k51r$u12$39@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> >
>>> My position is, the Doctor and Master were probably lovers
>>> and may even have been married, but they weren�?Tt necessarily
>>> the same sex at the time.
>>
>>I had thought that they had both been male from the beginning of the
>>Hartnell incarnation (the boy in the barn) to the time the Master became
>>Missy.
>
> Exactly!!!!!

Rubbish. Missy told Clara that she had known the Doctor "since he was a
little girl".