Hey starmaker, do you know

how many other lonely idiot trolls

are howling at the moon like you?

On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 17:18:14 -0500, Cyril Alberga
<Nowhere@invalid.nil> wrote:

>Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="(tebttvvdzt=========__1637619487)"
>
>--(tebttvvdzt=========__1637619487)
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>In article <g9jnpgl2m4fsl11ngp9a8mol9aqprvsthp@4ax.com>, psperson1
>@ix.netcom.invalid says...
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 01:26:56 -0800, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:20:39 -0500, J. Clarke
>> ><jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Not very smart though--any journalist worthy of the name who was given
>> >>such a list and told not to mention any of it would know that there
>> >>was something in the works. Not that it was much of a secret to the
>> >>physics community--one of my professors, who had been in grad school
>> >>at the time, commented that when they put together the list of noted
>> >>physicists who had "disappeared" the obvious conclusion was "atom
>> >>bomb".
>> >>
>> >
>> >Fair enough - but the Manhattan Project was always first an
>> >engineering and production triumph rather than a chemical or
>> >radiologicol triumph.
>> >
>> >Within an hour of the dropping of the Hiroshima bomb Japanese
>> >physicists had figured out WHAT had hit them and that it involved
>> >creating a critical mass of U-235 (they weren't aware of plutonium
>> >which was used in the Nagasaki bomb but U-235 was used in the
>> >Hiroshima bomb) and that radioactive materials were what the A-bomb
>> >was all about.
>> >
>> >What they didn't have was the ability to set up a manufacturing plant
>> >capable of actually building an atomic bomb of theri own.
>>
>> There appears to be a film, /Gift of Fire/
>> <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12015668/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1> about this.
>>
>> I've never seen it, so I have no idea what it has to say on the topic
>>
>> >Something along the lines of in the present day I know what goes into
>> >producing a reusable rocket but don't have the production ability at
>> >my command to actually do what SpaceX and their friends can do. I
>> >suspect an aeronautical engineer would have a better idea than I do on
>> >the specifics but without a manufacturing operation at his beck and
>> >call he'd have no more success than I would.
>> >
>> >The 'glory' of the US effort 1945-50 is that the engineers of the day
>> >worked out what the obstacles to the bomb were and how to overcome
>> >them which is very much a non-trivial exercise. For obvious reasons
>> >they keep the key points secret - how much of each isotope is critical
>> >mass, the specifics of isotope separation stuff like that.
>
>[I'm using a new new-reader for the first time. Appologies for messed
>up format, etc.]
>
>The attached might be of interest in this conversation.
>
>P. Taine
>
Whatever all that crap was don't post it to a non-binary newsgroup.

On Tuesday, 23 November 2021 at 00:25:28 UTC, J. Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 17:18:14 -0500, Cyril Alberga
> <Now...@invalid.nil> wrote:
>
> >Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="(tebttvvdzt=========__1637619487)"
> >
> >--(tebttvvdzt=========__1637619487)
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> >[I'm using a new new-reader for the first time. Appologies for messed
> >up format, etc.]
> >
> >The attached might be of interest in this conversation.
> >
> >P. Taine
> >
> Whatever all that crap was don't post it to a non-binary newsgroup.

It could go viral.

I'd say, "Use your words", but this discussion is mostly
"Starmaker" talking to himself, about himself, so:
use your commonsense. The only winning move is
not to play.

Here are excerpts from: --Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline)

U-235 has been separated in quantity easily sufficient for preliminary atomic-power research, and the like.
They got it out of uranium ores by new atomic isotope separation methods; they now have quantities measured in pounds.
But they have not brought the whole amount together, or any major portion of it. Because they are not at all sure that, once
started, it would stop before all of it had been consumed--in something like one micromicrosecond of time. [p. 154]

[...] Now the explosion of a pound of U-235, he said, 'Wouldn't be too unbearably violent, although it releases as
much energy as a hundred million pounds of TNT.

The surrounding matter, unable to maintain a self-supporting atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to
atomic explosion under U-235's forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, release its energy, too.

[...] What we need is a damper, something to hold the temperature of surrounding matter down. [p. 174]

[...] Two cast-iron hemispheres, clamped over the orange segments of cadmium alloy. And the fuse --- I see it is in -- a
tiny can of cadmium allow containing a speck of radium in a beryllium holder and a small explosive powerful enough to shatter
the cadmium walls... the powdered uranium oxide runs together in the central cavity.
The radium shoots neutrons into this mass--and the U-235 takes over from there.

Scientists from the other side of the world could not wait for their new issue of
Astounding Science Fiction to come out...
they were only interested in getting Updates of...The Atomic Bomb.

You can be sure Albert Einstein got his copy..

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> For Master spy Albert Einstein,
>
> Astounding Science Fiction magazine was the perfect
> vehicle to pass atomic secrets to the Russians.
> (passing information without making face to face contact)
>
> So, even before Astounding Science Fiction March 1944 ...
>
> "Someone in the United States government had realized the terrific potentialities of uranium 235 quite early and, as
> far back as the summer of 1940, had rounded up every atomic research man in the country and had sworn them to silence." --Astounding Science Fiction May 1941
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v27n03_1941-05/page/n57/mode/2up
>
> and there's more there!
>
> When the FBI comes to you and ask you "Where do you get your ideas?"
>
> you give them a name.
>
> "We were searching, there in the
> laboratory in Maryland, for a way
> to use U235 in a controlled explo-
> sion. We had a vision of a one-ton
> bomb that would be a whole air raid
> in itself, a single explosion that
> would flatten out an entire industrial
> center....
>
> The problem was, strangely
> enough, to find an explosive which
> would be weak enough to blow up
> only one county at a time, and stable
> enough to blow up only on request.
> If we could devise a really practical
> rocket fuel at the same time, one
> capable of driving a war rocket at a
> thousand miles an hour, or more,
> then we would be in a position to
> make most anybody say “uncle” to
> Uncle Sam. --Astounding Science Fiction May 1941
>
> When the FBI comes to you and ask you "Where do you get your ideas?"
>
> you give them a name. Whose name would you give?
>
> Or whose name you think they gave????
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > So, the writter of Astounding Science Fiction March 1944 (title: Deadline) story, by CLEVE CARTMILL, he
> > was approached by the FBI...
> >
> > and they asked him..."Where did you get your ideas from?"
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > As I mentioned before...Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the Russians..
> > > one of his many methods was
> > > passing information to the Russians with...
> > > comic books...
> > >
> > > Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline) has Albert Einstein fingerprints all over it.
> > >
> > > As you already know..Albert Einstein biggest lie was that the Germans were building an atomic bomb.
> > >
> > > So, he used that narrative in Astounding Science Fiction.
> > >
> > > The Title "Deadline"
> > >
> > > (build the bomb before the Germans build it) dats the deadline.
> > >
> > > Now, the very first paragraph reads:
> > >
> > > --
> > > Deadline
> > >
> > > by CLEVE CARTMILL
> > >
> > > There was a bomb that he wanted to destroy. It was
> > > in an enemy nation’s capital, and might explode at any
> > > moment. And that was precisely what he must prevent!
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Is this Relativity???
> > >
> > > "Time exists only in conscious-
> > > ness,” he said. “There won’t be
> > > any time, unless dust and rocks
> > > are aware of it." --Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline)
> > >
> > > or science fiction?
> > >
> > > There's more but it's only for Russians...commies.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > and the last sentence reads: "So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explosion of U-235." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> > > >
> > > > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan on August 1945...
> > > >
> > > > and this book was published March 1944..
> > > >
> > > > so I guess the comic book were still getting updates from Albert Einstein on it's progess.
> > > >
> > > > dats why Albert Einstein said:
> > > >
> > > > "....starting a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." - Albert Einstein
> > > >
> > > > "...imagine the earth being destroyed like a nova by a stellar explosion" -Albert Einstein
> > > >
> > > > "Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > > > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > > > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > > > explosion. And I mean every- thing." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> > > >
> > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> > > >
> > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> > > >
> > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> > > >
> > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > As I mentioned before..
> > > > >
> > > > > Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
> > > > > months earilier...
> > > > >
> > > > > and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..
> > > > >
> > > > > one other method I didn't mentioned was
> > > > > passing information to the russians with...
> > > > > comic books...
> > > > >
> > > > > This was published before
> > > > > they dropped the bomb on Japan..
> > > > >
> > > > > "“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT.
> > > > > Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
> > > > > eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
> > > > > “I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
> > > > > “Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable
> > > > > energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw,
> > > > > compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence
> > > > > of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
> > > > > “The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
> > > > > atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too.
> > > > > That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
> > > > > “Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
> > > > > “Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > > > > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > > > > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > > > > explosion. And I mean every- thing.
> > > > > “So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
> > > > > two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."
> > > > >
> > > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> > > > >
> > > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> > > > >
> > > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another... Einstein Lied Again
> > > > > >
> > > > > > is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> > > > > >
> > > > > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> > > > > >
> > > > > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (between the Administration and the group
> > > > > >
> > > > > > of physicists)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "One possible way
> > > > > >
> > > > > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> > > > > >
> > > > > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > > > >
> > > > > > capacity."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "His task might comprise the following:"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (now i know it's a guy!)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "to approach Government Departments,"
> > > > > > "keep them informed of the further development"
> > > > > > "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> > > > > > "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > > > "to speed up the experimental work"
> > > > > > "providing funds"
> > > > > > "through his contacts with private persons"
> > > > > > "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who is this masked man????
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who else...Leo Szilard.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> > > > > > indication of who that person might be with words like:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "a person who has your confidence"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > > > >
> > > > > > capacity."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> > > > > > is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Einstein Lied Again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Only Einstein can lie like that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > oh, did you see the draft?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 'which is at present'
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > being carried on
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > within the University laboratories.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > > > > > > the United States President????
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > b) *to speed up the experimental
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > His own little private manhattan project?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > > > > > > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > > > > > > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > > > > > > test?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > > > > > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > > > > > > hand!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > > > > > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > > > > > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > > > > > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > > > > > > Torpedo explosion...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Page 1
> > > > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > > > > Page 2
> > > > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > > > > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > > > > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > > > > > > >> >> they did in those
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > > > > > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > > > > > > >> and he tells her..
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > > > > > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > > > >> the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
(in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):

> - Untitled, 121 KB

Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.

So... why shouldn’t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?

In article <0001HW.274FB7F00193A06870000EA0D38F@news.eternal-
september.org>, akwolffan@zoho.com says...
>
> On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
> (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
>
> > - Untitled, 121 KB
>
> Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
> text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
> binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
> from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
> text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
>
> So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?

As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
devices.

I guess that isn't relevant to SF anymore, and the the SF community on
usenet is rather inflexible.

P. Taine

Cyril Alberga <Nowhere@invalid.nil> writes:
>In article <0001HW.274FB7F00193A06870000EA0D38F@news.eternal-
>september.org>, akwolffan@zoho.com says...
>>
>> On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
>> (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
>>
>> > - Untitled, 121 KB
>>
>> Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
>> text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
>> binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
>> from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
>> text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
>>
>> So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
>
>As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
>talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
>fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
>devices.

Many newsreaders don't handle binary content. Usenet providers may filter
binaries from non-binary groups. Usenet etiquette generally requires binaries
to be posted to the appropriate binary group.

Could you not, instead, have posted a link to the Smithsonian website
or other internet resource instead?

On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:10:10 -0500, Cyril Alberga
<Nowhere@invalid.nil> wrote:

>In article <0001HW.274FB7F00193A06870000EA0D38F@news.eternal-
>september.org>, akwolffan@zoho.com says...
>>
>> On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
>> (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
>>
>> > - Untitled, 121 KB
>>
>> Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
>> text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
>> binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
>> from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
>> text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
>>
>> So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
>
>As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
>talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
>fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
>devices.
>
>I guess that isn't relevant to SF anymore, and the the SF community on
>usenet is rather inflexible.

Given that nuclear weapons have been used in war and tested
extensively and large stockpiles of them exist in a number of
different countries, they are no more science fictional than chewing
gum and hand grenades.

Why do you believe it would be of interest and why did you have to
post it as a binary instead of just posting a link?

On 2021 Nov 28, Cyril Alberga wrote
(in article<MPG.3c0d81fbc593fc06989687@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):

> In article<0001HW.274FB7F00193A06870000EA0D38F@news.eternal-
> september.org>, akwolffan@zoho.com says...
> >
> > On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
> > (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
> >
> > > - Untitled, 121 KB
> >
> > Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
> > text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally
> > irrelevant
> > binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
> > from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
> > text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
> >
> > So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
>
> As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
> talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
> fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
> devices.

the only thing which came through was the image of the title page. A simple
copy-and-paste of the transcript would have been sufficient. Well, a
copy-and-paste, plus a few words from you about where you got it and why
it’s relevant. The title page was singularly uninformative.

A link to the site, plus, of course some comment about why the link is
relevant, would have worked, too.
>
>
> I guess that isn't relevant to SF anymore,

as only the title page was visible, and as you elected to not give any
context, well... exactly how was anyone supposed to know why you posted a
random binary?
> and the the SF community on
> usenet is rather inflexible.

The majority of newsfeeds drop binaries when posted to text-only groups. I
use two feeds. Your post showed in one but not the other, as that one drops
binaries when posted to text-only groups. A lot of people around here use
neewsfeeds which will drop binaries in text-only groups, soyou considerably
restricted your possible audience.

And then you didn’t post any text clarifying your position Someone’s
inflexible, all right...
>
>
> P. Taine

On 2021 Nov 28, Scott Lurndal wrote
(in article <K2PoJ.73697$3q9.33827@fx47.iad>):

> Cyril Alberga <Nowhere@invalid.nil> writes:
> > In article<0001HW.274FB7F00193A06870000EA0D38F@news.eternal-
> > september.org>, akwolffan@zoho.com says...
> > >
> > > On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
> > > (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
> > >
> > > > - Untitled, 121 KB
> > >
> > > Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
> > > text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally
> > > irrelevant
> > > binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
> > > from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
> > > text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
> > >
> > > So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
> >
> > As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
> > talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
> > fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
> > devices.
>
> Many newsreaders don't handle binary content. Usenet providers may filter
> binaries from non-binary groups. Usenet etiquette generally requires binaries
> to be posted to the appropriate binary group.
>
> Could you not, instead, have posted a link to the Smithsonian website
> or other internet resource instead?

that’s how I would have done it. Or maybe I’d have copy-pasted. But
that’s me.

On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:10:10 -0500, Cyril Alberga
<Nowhere@invalid.nil> wrote:

>In article <0001HW.274FB7F00193A06870000EA0D38F@news.eternal-
>september.org>, akwolffan@zoho.com says...
>>
>> On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
>> (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
>>
>> > - Untitled, 121 KB
>>
>> Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
>> text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
>> binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
>> from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
>> text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
>>
>> So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
>
>As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
>talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
>fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
>devices.
>
>I guess that isn't relevant to SF anymore, and the the SF community on
>usenet is rather inflexible.

This isn't about relevence or inflexibility.

The problem is that what I saw was a bunch of (I suppose) hex-encoded
byte values. A lot of them.

IOW, the problem is that communication did not occur. As you say
above, it was "fumbled".

Typed-in text. Or a link, with a note to say what it is about. That
/does/ work.
--
"I begin to envy Petronius."
"I have envied him long since."

In article <K2PoJ.73697$3q9.33827@fx47.iad>, scott@slp53.sl.home says...
>
> Cyril Alberga <Nowhere@invalid.nil> writes:
> >In article <0001HW.274FB7F00193A06870000EA0D38F@news.eternal-
> >september.org>, akwolffan@zoho.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
> >> (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
> >>
> >> > - Untitled, 121 KB
> >>
> >> Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
> >> text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
> >> binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
> >> from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
> >> text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
> >>
> >> So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
> >
> >As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
> >talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
> >fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
> >devices.
>
> Many newsreaders don't handle binary content. Usenet providers may filter
> binaries from non-binary groups. Usenet etiquette generally requires binaries
> to be posted to the appropriate binary group.
>
> Could you not, instead, have posted a link to the Smithsonian website
> or other internet resource instead?

Fine, I violated the protocols, which I had always thought of as
cultural, not built in. The problem was that I have no link to post, I
have a physical book, you know, ink on paper, and I packages the scanned
images (6) as a .pdf file. Why only the title page displayed I have no
idea, it works for me. Why science fiction? I guess I'm the only one
old enough to remember the Cartmill affair -- for details look up
"Deadline" in Wikipedia. But I guess history of SF is off the table as
well. Why no text? I have the (obviously deplorable) desire to avoid a
précis of material given to me, effectively a spoiler. Again, sorry for
disappointing people who want thing explained before they have to face
them.

In article <rq0aqgd645bkbv6b31i7j8jsi8pofctj4k@4ax.com>, psperson1
@ix.netcom.invalid says...
>
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:10:10 -0500, Cyril Alberga
> <Nowhere@invalid.nil> wrote:
>
> >In article <0001HW.274FB7F00193A06870000EA0D38F@news.eternal-
> >september.org>, akwolffan@zoho.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
> >> (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
> >>
> >> > - Untitled, 121 KB
> >>
> >> Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
> >> text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
> >> binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
> >> from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
> >> text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
> >>
> >> So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
> >
> >As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
> >talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
> >fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
> >devices.
> >
> >I guess that isn't relevant to SF anymore, and the the SF community on
> >usenet is rather inflexible.
>
> This isn't about relevence or inflexibility.
>
> The problem is that what I saw was a bunch of (I suppose) hex-encoded
> byte values. A lot of them.
>
> IOW, the problem is that communication did not occur. As you say
> above, it was "fumbled".
>
> Typed-in text. Or a link, with a note to say what it is about. That
> /does/ work.

Okay, For the record, the .pdf was not of scanned images, it was created
from a WordPerfect file, which I though would be less likely to be of
use to others. For why I thought it would be of intrest, check
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadline_(science_fiction_story)

And here it is, probably more platable the a formated text.

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD
OF REGENTS OF
THE SMITHSONIAN
INSTITUTION
SHOWING THE
OPERATIONS, EXPENDITURES, AND
CONDITION OF THE INSTITUTION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30
1940

(Publication 3606)
PROPERTY OF
CAIRO PUBLIC LIBRARY
UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1941
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. ------
Price 31-50 (doth cover)

NUCLEAR FISSION'
By KARL K. darrow Bell
Telephone Laboratories
Some time this summer the art of transmutation will come to its
majority; that is to say, 21 years will have passed since the day it was
born in Rutherford's laboratory. Infancy and adolescence for this
art have been marked by more stages than we generally count for
human children; I propose to distinguish six. Here follows a table
of six great events in the story of transmutation, beginning with birth
and ending with fission, which, by the way, bears a name that in
biology means a certain sort of birth. Each of them lifted the art to
a higher level with a broader scope. It is only the sixth and latest
which is my topic, but all the others lead up to it, as I will show
immediately with the table for my text.
Table of great events in history of transmutation
1919. First success with helium nuclei (energy of activation derived
from
radium, etc.).
1932. First success with hydrogen nuclei (energy of activation derived
from
voltage).
1932. Recognition of the liberated neutron.
1934. Recognition of radioactive bodies resulting from transmutation.
1934. Slow neutrons used to produce transmutation, this resulting in
radioactive
bodies.
1939. Recognition of fission.
Be it said that, in general, transmutation takes place when two
nuclei meet and enter into a reaction with each other. They are made
to meet by projecting one against the other, and accordingly we
speak of one as the projectile and of the other as the target.
Transmutation does not occur whenever a projectile comes into the
neighborhood of a target nucleus, but only on rare occasions which I
will call "lucky hits." There are four principal kinds of projectiles
in use for transmutation: Helium nuclei?hydrogen nuclei of two sorts,
the light and the heavy?and neutrons. Three stages of my
chronology have been marked with their names. The phenomena of
fission
are produced with neutrons as the projectiles and uranium2 as the
target, and they therefore belong in the fifth stage of the chronology.
But they also depend on the first and the second stages, for neutrons
are always obtained by bombarding various targets with projectiles of
the first three kinds; and of course they depend on the third, because
if the neutron had not been recognized it would hardly now be in
use as a tool. Moreover, they depend upon the fourth; the phenomena
of fission were first detected because the new-born elements resulting
from it are radioactive, and to this day they are often, though not
always, observed through this radioactivity. Next it will be noticed
that instead of putting fission into the fifth stage, I gave it a line
and a stage to itself, and said "recognition of fission" instead of
"discovery of fission." This was not in order to compose a three-word
poem, but because the phenomena were detected about 4 years before
they were properly analyzed; a strange and interesting story, for
which, however, there is not space.
Now I make final use of the table in speaking about energy.
Everyone has heard so much about the gigantic energies and the
huge voltages required for transmutation, that anyone may be
pardoned for thinking that transmutation is a process which
swallows up enormous quantities of energy?which is strongly
endothermic, to use the chemical word. Well, there are many
transmutations that swallow energy up without restoring it, but many
of them give back much more than they receive. I mean by this
simply that whenever a projectile makes a "lucky" hit on a target the
total energy of motion of the new-born nuclei is greater than that of
the projectile. On balance the experimenter does spend much more
energy than is released, because of the amount which he is obliged to
squander on projectiles which never make lucky hits; but if one
considers only those which do transmute, then their energy may well
be smaller and even very much smaller than that which appears on the
new-born nuclei. This is what I mean to suggest by using the name
"energy of activation" for the energy which hydrogen or helium nuclei
must have in order to make them efficient projectiles. It is, however,
the release of energy which is one of the spectacular features of
fission.
This release of energy is indeed amazing. When the process occurs
in any single nucleus there is released?in the form of kinetic
energy of the new-born particles?the appalling amount of 175,000,000
electron-volts. To get a notion of what this figure means, remember
that in the synthesis of hydrogen and oxygen into water?perhaps
the most terrific explosion of all of chemistry?there is released

* The lecture was confined to the fission of uranium by slow neutrons.
"Fast" neutrons (of energies amounting to a million or millions of
electron-volts) produce fission of a different isotope of uranium,
and also of thorium and of protactinium.

between two and three electron-volts for each pair of reacting
molecules; and in the notorious explosives of industry and war, such
as TNT and nitroglycerine, not even so much as that.
Now I have said that fission occurs when a slow neutron impinges
on a uranium nucleus, and that an enormous amount of energy is
released, and that the resulting new-born elements are radioactive;
but I have not yet said what these new-born elements are. This is
the second of the astonishing features of fission. All other
transmutations have resulted in changing the target element to some
other not more than two steps away from it in the periodic table of
the elements. In this periodic table, uranium stands at the ninety-
second and last place; but the no fewer than 16 different elements
thus far identified among the "fission-products" (as they are
called) stand in places ranging from the thirty-fifth to the fifty-
seventh! What happens in fission is therefore something never before
observed?the division of a massive nucleus into two nearly equal
fragments. In ordinary transmutations of heavy nuclei, a particle
small in both charge and mass pops into a nucleus, and another
particle small in charge and mass pops out. In this kind of
transmutation a particle of small mass and no charge at all wanders
into a uranium nucleus, and the nucleus promptly bursts apart into
two pieces not exactly alike indeed but not very different from one
another. Fission in biology is the division of a cell into two which
are very much alike in size, and this is the source of the name.
As for the fact that fission results in so many different types of
nucleus instead of just two, that probably has a double meaning.
Many of the radioactive bodies which are observed during and
after fission are clearly not the original fragments of the explosions,
for after the neutron influx is suspended they increase for a while
in amount instead of diminishing. It is clear that these are
descendants of the original fission fragments, and the question as to
which are really the original ones is at present a very live one.
Theory suggests that the initial fragment-pair need not always be the
same. One nucleus, on being entered by a neutron, may burst into
barium and krypton, another into xenon and strontium, another
perhaps into caesium and rubidium. (Note that the members of
these element-pairs are so chosen that their atomic numbers add up
to 92, which is a way of saying that the entire positive charge of the
uranium nucleus must be found upon the two initial fragments
immediately after the explosion.) Whatever the initial fragment-
pair may be, one at least of its members must be the parent of a long
chain of radioactive bodies, and probably both are. This sufficiently
accounts for the fact that the fission process produces radioactive
elements in a profusion and variety beyond any other which is known.
I have saved the most sensational item for the last. Not only is
fission caused by slow neutrons, but it produces fresh neutrons among
its many products. Could these fresh neutrons produce fission in
their turn ? Presumably they could; we know of nothing to
differentiate them from other neutrons. Could they produce new
fissions and these in turn new fissions and so onward in geometrical
progression, so that a whole massive piece of uranium might blow up
in a sudden explosion of unparalleled fury touched oil by so seemingly
innocent an event as the entry of a single neutron ?
This is perhaps the most important of the unsolved questions of
physics. Let us begin by asking after a certain necessary though not
sufficient condition. The fissions cannot proceed in geometrical
progression, the explosion of the whole mass cannot occur, unless each
fission results (on the average) in more than one free neutron to
replace the one neutron which is consumed in producing it. Is it so ?
Well, the few people whose opinions are worth taking agree that it
is. They do not agree well as to how many fresh neutrons there are
over and above one, but they do agree that there is an excess.
With this as a basis, let us turn the question around. Why has not
the great explosion happened as yet, since there are neutrons enough
to achieve it?
One reason apparently is, that the fresh neutrons are moving with
the wrong speeds when they are released. Fission is performed
mainly by very slow neutrons, while the new-born ones are very rapid.
But if the piece of uranium were very large, even the fresh neutrons
would be slowed down by their repeated collisions with nuclei; and
therefore those who are trying to make the explosion, or trying to
approach it without quite making it, are heaping up great masses of
uranium. If, however, the uranium is mixed with other elements?as
in nature it always has been?the neutrons are liable to be captured
and rendered harmless by the nuclei of these others. Therefore, the
next step is to purify the uranium. This would be easy enough were
it not that "purity" in this connection means something more stringent
than even chemical purity. Within the last few weeks it has been
proved that only one isotope of uranium is sensitive to slow neutrons,
and this is a rare one?fortunately, I feel like saying. One must
perform a process of isotope-separation in which the two isotopes
differ in mass by less than 2 percent, and one is more than a hundred
times as abundant as the other. Probably this will take a long time
in the doing. If and when it is done, shall we find that human artifice
has succeeded in removing or relaxing the last brake provided by
nature to impede the slide toward catastrophe? Perhaps not even
then, for the rare isotope of uranium may have ways of its own for
capturing neutrons and rendering them harmless before the most of
them achieve fissions. Perhaps on the other hand the brakes are easier
to relax than the foregoing words imply. Possibly they can be relaxed
just a little without letting go altogether, and then there may be
available a potent source of power. But at this point I depart from the
traditional detachment of the scientist, and express the fervent hope
that the mastery of this process, if ever to be achieved at all, will
not
be achieved until the world is ready to use it wisely.

On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:48:22 -0500, Cyril Alberga
<Nowhere@invalid.nil> wrote:

>In article <K2PoJ.73697$3q9.33827@fx47.iad>, scott@slp53.sl.home says...
>>
>> Cyril Alberga <Nowhere@invalid.nil> writes:
>> >In article <0001HW.274FB7F00193A06870000EA0D38F@news.eternal-
>> >september.org>, akwolffan@zoho.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
>> >> (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5c5338e3989683@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
>> >>
>> >> > - Untitled, 121 KB
>> >>
>> >> Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
>> >> text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
>> >> binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
>> >> from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
>> >> text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
>> >>
>> >> So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
>> >
>> >As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
>> >talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
>> >fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
>> >devices.
>>
>> Many newsreaders don't handle binary content. Usenet providers may filter
>> binaries from non-binary groups. Usenet etiquette generally requires binaries
>> to be posted to the appropriate binary group.
>>
>> Could you not, instead, have posted a link to the Smithsonian website
>> or other internet resource instead?
>
>Fine, I violated the protocols, which I had always thought of as
>cultural, not built in. The problem was that I have no link to post, I
>have a physical book, you know, ink on paper, and I packages the scanned
>images (6) as a .pdf file. Why only the title page displayed I have no
>idea, it works for me. Why science fiction? I guess I'm the only one
>old enough to remember the Cartmill affair -- for details look up
>"Deadline" in Wikipedia. But I guess history of SF is off the table as
>well. Why no text? I have the (obviously deplorable) desire to avoid a
>précis of material given to me, effectively a spoiler. Again, sorry for
>disappointing people who want thing explained before they have to face
>them.

No, no, we just want things to be /readable/.

We want /communication/ to occur.

And, BTW, making excuses doesn't really help.
--
"I begin to envy Petronius."
"I have envied him long since."

On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-5, Cyril Alberga wrote:
> In article <K2PoJ.73697$3q9....@fx47.iad>, sc...@slp53.sl.home says...
> >
> > Cyril Alberga <Now...@invalid.nil> writes:
> > >In article <0001HW.274FB7F001...@news.eternal-
> > >september.org>, akwo...@zoho.com says...
> > >>
> > >> On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
> > >> (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5...@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
> > >>
> > >> > - Untitled, 121 KB
> > >>
> > >> Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
> > >> text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
> > >> binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
> > >> from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
> > >> text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
> > >>
> > >> So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
> > >
> > >As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
> > >talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
> > >fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
> > >devices.
> >
> > Many newsreaders don't handle binary content. Usenet providers may filter
> > binaries from non-binary groups. Usenet etiquette generally requires binaries
> > to be posted to the appropriate binary group.
> >
> > Could you not, instead, have posted a link to the Smithsonian website
> > or other internet resource instead?
> Fine, I violated the protocols, which I had always thought of as
> cultural, not built in. The problem was that I have no link to post, I
> have a physical book, you know, ink on paper, and I packages the scanned
> images (6) as a .pdf file. Why only the title page displayed I have no
> idea, it works for me. Why science fiction? I guess I'm the only one
> old enough to remember the Cartmill affair -- for details look up
> "Deadline" in Wikipedia. But I guess history of SF is off the table as
> well. Why no text? I have the (obviously deplorable) desire to avoid a
> précis of material given to me, effectively a spoiler. Again, sorry for
> disappointing people who want thing explained before they have to face
> them.

The problem wasn't the content; it was the format. It appeared as a random
jumble of binary code, and was completely unreadable to everyone.

Usenet does not handle anything but ASCII (and increasingly UTF-8) gracefully.

pt

On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-5, Cyril Alberga wrote:
> In article <K2PoJ.73697$3q9....@fx47.iad>, sc...@slp53.sl.home says...
> >
> > Cyril Alberga <Now...@invalid.nil> writes:
> > >In article <0001HW.274FB7F001...@news.eternal-
> > >september.org>, akwo...@zoho.com says...
> > >>
> > >> On 2021 Nov 22, Cyril Alberga wrote
> > >> (in article<MPG.3c05e12f5...@news-ssl.newsgroupdirect.com>):
> > >>
> > >> > - Untitled, 121 KB
> > >>
> > >> Hmm. A binary, posted to a text-only group. Hmm. A binary, posted to a
> > >> text-only group... with no text. Hmm. What appears to be a totally irrelevant
> > >> binary, an image of what is allegedly the title page of a 1940 publication
> > >> from an institution which has very little to do with SFF, posted to a
> > >> text-only group allegedly aimed at written SFF. Hmm.
> > >>
> > >> So... why shouldn?t I just killfile you now and avoid the rush?
> > >
> > >As you wish. It was my fumbling attempt to post the transcription of a
> > >talk given at the Smithsonian in 1940, presenting the recent work on
> > >fission of Uranium, particularly U235, and the potential for explosive
> > >devices.
> >
> > Many newsreaders don't handle binary content. Usenet providers may filter
> > binaries from non-binary groups. Usenet etiquette generally requires binaries
> > to be posted to the appropriate binary group.
> >
> > Could you not, instead, have posted a link to the Smithsonian website
> > or other internet resource instead?
> Fine, I violated the protocols, which I had always thought of as
> cultural, not built in. The problem was that I have no link to post, I
> have a physical book, you know, ink on paper, and I packages the scanned
> images (6) as a .pdf file. Why only the title page displayed I have no
> idea, it works for me. Why science fiction? I guess I'm the only one
> old enough to remember the Cartmill affair

It's common knowledge.

William Hyde

"bozo de niro" wrote in message
news:07256734-a359-4681-a11d-6d6e44e89e81n@googlegroups.com...

JAY SMILKSTEIN / bozo de niro

Bozo_D...@37.com

Plaintiff: WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Index No: 541-07
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY
(More Information Below)

Jay A. Smilkstein
105 Manchester Drive,
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
@ Corner Of Marion Avenue
3.0 Bedroom
1.5 Bath
$ 480 K

914-666-6811 <------ 666 (Mark of Beast)

Everyone is jumping ship, (voyage of the damned) getting out.
Harry & Jay's Glory Hole home neighbors:
111 Manchester Drive, Mount Kisco, NY
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/111-Manchester-Dr-Mount-Kisco-NY-...

I just want to say here that my father Harry Smilkstein is still
alive at 99 years old, and in no way is my life a re-play of that
PSYCHO movie where my parent is dead in a room.
My father Harry Smilkstein is proud of me and he stands by me
and everything I do on the internet, harassing people on a vast
scale all over the world and especially New York.

I am beautiful:
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/07012011.jpg
WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

I STILL LIVE WITH DADDY JEW
I AM BOZO (Jay Smilkstein)

Jay A Smilkstein
AGE: 51 years old

RELATIVES:
Harry Smilkstein
Address:
105 Manchester Dr
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
(914) 666-6811
Mount Kisco, NY
AGE: 99 years old

Jay A Smilkstein
Address :
105 Manchester Dr
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
(914) 666-6811
Mount Kisco, NY
AGE 51 Years

Bozo's Mt. Kisko address is: 105 Manchester Drive
Mount Kisco, NY
914-666-6811

AMAZING THE JEW HAS A 666 PHONE NUMBER !
THE MARK OF THE BEAST !

Bozo ---> WIKIPEDIA Created A Page Because
The Jew Pest Jay Smilkstein, Is
A Notorious AntiChrist Satan Kike
Who Bothers Jew York Radio Stations
With His Angst To Promote Satanic
Judaic Bolshevik Pornographic Hassidics

WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

Plaintiff: BOURICIOUS WILLARD BOURICIOUS WILLARD Index No:
10830-04
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY Add. Info: CONTRACT

10830-04 2004/07/19 00 INDEX NUMBER APPLICATION
10830-04 2004/07/19 02 SUMMONS & COMPLAINT

Plaintiff: WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Index No:
541-07
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY Add. Info: F/S

541-07 2007/01/10 00 INDEX NUMBER APPLICATION
541-07 2007/01/10 02 SUMMONS & COMPLAINT
541-07 2007/01/10 LP LIS PENDENS SMILKSTEIN JAY
541-07 2007/01/10 LP LIS PENDENS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
541-07 2007/01/10 LP LIS PENDENS DOE JOHN
541-07 2007/01/19 03 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
541-07 2007/01/22 03 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
541-07 2007/03/02 06 RJI
541-07 2007/03/14 10 ORDER GIACOMO
541-07 2007/07/13 58 JDG F/S (FORECLOSURE & SALE)
541-07 2007/07/13 67 JUDGMENT ROLL
541-07 2007/09/07 30 DECISION & ORDER LOEHR
541-07 2007/09/07 03 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
541-07 2007/09/07 15 AFFIRMATION
541-07 2007/09/07 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE LOEHR
541-07 2007/09/07 15 AFFIRMATION
541-07 2007/09/07 03 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
541-07 2007/09/07 15 AFFIRMATION
541-07 2007/09/17 39 NOTICE OF ENTRY
541-07 2007/09/26 39 NOTICE OF ENTRY
541-07 2007/10/17 19 ANSWER
541-07 2009/01/16 30 DECISION & ORDER LOEHR
541-07 2009/01/16 11 MOTION
541-07 2009/01/16 36 SUPPORTING PLEADINGS
541-07 2009/05/21 63 TRIAL-READINESS ORDER LOEHR
541-07 2009/06/17 99 RESPONSE
541-07 2009/06/30 07 NOTE OF ISSUE
541-07 2009/09/09 99 RESPONSE
541-07 2009/09/11 48 NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION (UPON ORAL
EXAMINATION)
541-07 2009/09/25 40 STIPULATION
541-07 2010/01/26 99 NOTICE TO ADMIT

Control #: F06199075 Recording Date: 1999/03/16 Liber: 12250
Document class: Conveyance Papers Document Type: Deed Page: 00257
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Smilkstein Harry/adm First Party - Individual
Smilkstein Jay Second Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco

Control #: F06299075 Recording Date: 1999/03/16 Liber: 25324
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page:
00294
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Ameriquest Mortgage Co Second Party - Corporation
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco
Transaction Notes
STM 402700296 Discharged 11 Oct 00

Control #: 402230602 Recording Date: 2000/08/21 Liber: n/a
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page: n/a
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Delta Funding Corp Second Party - Corporation
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco
Transaction Notes
STM 430390304 Discharged
STM 430390320 Discharged
STM 433570614 Discharged 29 Jan 04

Control #: 420370553 Recording Date: 2002/02/19 Liber: n/a
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page: n/a
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Bouricius Willard G Second Party - Individual
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Bouricius Jean Second Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco
Transaction Notes
STM 442890016 Discharged 08 Feb 05

Control #: 420510469 Recording Date: 2002/02/27 Liber: n/a
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page: n/a
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Accredited Home Lenders Inc Second Party - Corporation
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco
Transaction Notes Image Liber/Page Doc Ref # Description Additonal
Info
Details
ASS 422620090 Assignment
STM 443370011 Discharged

Control #: 442890027 Recording Date: 2005/02/08 Liber: n/a
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page: n/a
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Washington Mutual Bank F A Second Party - Corporation
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco

Jay Smilkstein ("Bozo de Nero") - 64 A.D. Rome Mass Murder
Psychotropic Insane American JEW
Bozo Jay Smilkstein ("Bozo de Nero", "Bozo de Niro", "the deleter",
"Stan de SD")
Publicly Exhibited Emulation Of 'Nero' 64 A.D. Rome Fire

Bozo ---> WIKIPEDIA Created A Page Because
The Jew Pest Jay Smilkstein, Is
A Notorious AntiChrist Satan Kike
Who Bothers Jew York Radio Stations
With His Angst To Promote Satanic
Judaic Bolshevik Pornographic Hassidics

WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

Employed Circus Jew Clown Bozo Jay Smilkstein:
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/bozo_wild_jew.wav

> Jay A Smilkstein
> 105 Manchester Dr
> Mount Kisco, NY 10549
> AGE 51 Years

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/275659_100000408793494...

http://www.hfunderground.com/w/images/thumb/3/3c/Bozo_fest.jpg/300p...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/28334187@N07/2643592443/
JAY SMILKSTEIN / bozo de niro

Plaintiff: WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Index No: 541-07
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY
(More Information Below)

Jay A. Smilkstein
105 Manchester Drive,
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
@ Corner Of Marion Avenue
3.0 Bedroom
1.5 Bath
$ 480 K

914-666-6811 <------ 666 (Mark of Beast)

Everyone is jumping ship, (voyage of the damned) getting out.
Harry & Jay's Glory Hole home neighbors:
111 Manchester Drive, Mount Kisco, NY
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/111-Manchester-Dr-Mount-Kisco-NY-...

I just want to say here that my father Harry Smilkstein is still
alive at 99 years old, and in no way is my life a re-play of that
PSYCHO movie where my parent is dead in a room.
My father Harry Smilkstein is proud of me and he stands by me
and everything I do on the internet, harassing people on a vast
scale all over the world and especially New York.

I am beautiful:
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/07012011.jpg
WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

I STILL LIVE WITH DADDY JEW
I AM BOZO (Jay Smilkstein)

Jay A Smilkstein
AGE: 51 years old

RELATIVES:
Harry Smilkstein
Address:
105 Manchester Dr
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
(914) 666-6811
Mount Kisco, NY
AGE: 99 years old

Jay A Smilkstein
Address :
105 Manchester Dr
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
(914) 666-6811
Mount Kisco, NY
AGE 51 Years

Bozo's Mt. Kisko address is: 105 Manchester Drive
Mount Kisco, NY
914-666-6811

AMAZING THE JEW HAS A 666 PHONE NUMBER !
THE MARK OF THE BEAST !

Bozo ---> WIKIPEDIA Created A Page Because
The Jew Pest Jay Smilkstein, Is
A Notorious AntiChrist Satan Kike
Who Bothers Jew York Radio Stations
With His Angst To Promote Satanic
Judaic Bolshevik Pornographic Hassidics

WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

Plaintiff: BOURICIOUS WILLARD BOURICIOUS WILLARD Index No:
10830-04
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY Add. Info: CONTRACT

10830-04 2004/07/19 00 INDEX NUMBER APPLICATION
10830-04 2004/07/19 02 SUMMONS & COMPLAINT

"bozo de niro" wrote in message
news:4e223fa4-4268-4c17-ac51-8cd7b40453ben@googlegroups.com...

Hey starmaker, do you know

how many other lonely idiot trolls

are howling at the moon like you?

-----------------------------------

JAY SMILKSTEIN / bozo de niro

Bozo_D...@37.com

Plaintiff: WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Index No: 541-07
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY
(More Information Below)

Jay A. Smilkstein
105 Manchester Drive,
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
@ Corner Of Marion Avenue
3.0 Bedroom
1.5 Bath
$ 480 K

914-666-6811 <------ 666 (Mark of Beast)

Everyone is jumping ship, (voyage of the damned) getting out.
Harry & Jay's Glory Hole home neighbors:
111 Manchester Drive, Mount Kisco, NY
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/111-Manchester-Dr-Mount-Kisco-NY-...

I just want to say here that my father Harry Smilkstein is still
alive at 99 years old, and in no way is my life a re-play of that
PSYCHO movie where my parent is dead in a room.
My father Harry Smilkstein is proud of me and he stands by me
and everything I do on the internet, harassing people on a vast
scale all over the world and especially New York.

I am beautiful:
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/07012011.jpg
WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

I STILL LIVE WITH DADDY JEW
I AM BOZO (Jay Smilkstein)

Jay A Smilkstein
AGE: 51 years old

RELATIVES:
Harry Smilkstein
Address:
105 Manchester Dr
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
(914) 666-6811
Mount Kisco, NY
AGE: 99 years old

Jay A Smilkstein
Address :
105 Manchester Dr
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
(914) 666-6811
Mount Kisco, NY
AGE 51 Years

Bozo's Mt. Kisko address is: 105 Manchester Drive
Mount Kisco, NY
914-666-6811

AMAZING THE JEW HAS A 666 PHONE NUMBER !
THE MARK OF THE BEAST !

Bozo ---> WIKIPEDIA Created A Page Because
The Jew Pest Jay Smilkstein, Is
A Notorious AntiChrist Satan Kike
Who Bothers Jew York Radio Stations
With His Angst To Promote Satanic
Judaic Bolshevik Pornographic Hassidics

WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

Plaintiff: BOURICIOUS WILLARD BOURICIOUS WILLARD Index No:
10830-04
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY Add. Info: CONTRACT

10830-04 2004/07/19 00 INDEX NUMBER APPLICATION
10830-04 2004/07/19 02 SUMMONS & COMPLAINT

Plaintiff: WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Index No:
541-07
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY Add. Info: F/S

541-07 2007/01/10 00 INDEX NUMBER APPLICATION
541-07 2007/01/10 02 SUMMONS & COMPLAINT
541-07 2007/01/10 LP LIS PENDENS SMILKSTEIN JAY
541-07 2007/01/10 LP LIS PENDENS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
541-07 2007/01/10 LP LIS PENDENS DOE JOHN
541-07 2007/01/19 03 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
541-07 2007/01/22 03 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
541-07 2007/03/02 06 RJI
541-07 2007/03/14 10 ORDER GIACOMO
541-07 2007/07/13 58 JDG F/S (FORECLOSURE & SALE)
541-07 2007/07/13 67 JUDGMENT ROLL
541-07 2007/09/07 30 DECISION & ORDER LOEHR
541-07 2007/09/07 03 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
541-07 2007/09/07 15 AFFIRMATION
541-07 2007/09/07 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE LOEHR
541-07 2007/09/07 15 AFFIRMATION
541-07 2007/09/07 03 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
541-07 2007/09/07 15 AFFIRMATION
541-07 2007/09/17 39 NOTICE OF ENTRY
541-07 2007/09/26 39 NOTICE OF ENTRY
541-07 2007/10/17 19 ANSWER
541-07 2009/01/16 30 DECISION & ORDER LOEHR
541-07 2009/01/16 11 MOTION
541-07 2009/01/16 36 SUPPORTING PLEADINGS
541-07 2009/05/21 63 TRIAL-READINESS ORDER LOEHR
541-07 2009/06/17 99 RESPONSE
541-07 2009/06/30 07 NOTE OF ISSUE
541-07 2009/09/09 99 RESPONSE
541-07 2009/09/11 48 NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION (UPON ORAL
EXAMINATION)
541-07 2009/09/25 40 STIPULATION
541-07 2010/01/26 99 NOTICE TO ADMIT

Control #: F06199075 Recording Date: 1999/03/16 Liber: 12250
Document class: Conveyance Papers Document Type: Deed Page: 00257
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Smilkstein Harry/adm First Party - Individual
Smilkstein Jay Second Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco

Control #: F06299075 Recording Date: 1999/03/16 Liber: 25324
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page:
00294
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Ameriquest Mortgage Co Second Party - Corporation
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco
Transaction Notes
STM 402700296 Discharged 11 Oct 00

Control #: 402230602 Recording Date: 2000/08/21 Liber: n/a
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page: n/a
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Delta Funding Corp Second Party - Corporation
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco
Transaction Notes
STM 430390304 Discharged
STM 430390320 Discharged
STM 433570614 Discharged 29 Jan 04

Control #: 420370553 Recording Date: 2002/02/19 Liber: n/a
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page: n/a
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Bouricius Willard G Second Party - Individual
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Bouricius Jean Second Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco
Transaction Notes
STM 442890016 Discharged 08 Feb 05

Control #: 420510469 Recording Date: 2002/02/27 Liber: n/a
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page: n/a
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Accredited Home Lenders Inc Second Party - Corporation
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco
Transaction Notes Image Liber/Page Doc Ref # Description Additonal
Info
Details
ASS 422620090 Assignment
STM 443370011 Discharged

Control #: 442890027 Recording Date: 2005/02/08 Liber: n/a
Document class: Mortgage Papers Document Type: Mortgage Page: n/a
Transaction Parties Last/Corp Name First Name Party
Smilkstein Jay First Party - Individual
Washington Mutual Bank F A Second Party - Corporation
Transaction Towns Mt. Kisco

Jay Smilkstein ("Bozo de Nero") - 64 A.D. Rome Mass Murder
Psychotropic Insane American JEW
Bozo Jay Smilkstein ("Bozo de Nero", "Bozo de Niro", "the deleter",
"Stan de SD")
Publicly Exhibited Emulation Of 'Nero' 64 A.D. Rome Fire

Bozo ---> WIKIPEDIA Created A Page Because
The Jew Pest Jay Smilkstein, Is
A Notorious AntiChrist Satan Kike
Who Bothers Jew York Radio Stations
With His Angst To Promote Satanic
Judaic Bolshevik Pornographic Hassidics

WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

Employed Circus Jew Clown Bozo Jay Smilkstein:
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/bozo_wild_jew.wav

> Jay A Smilkstein
> 105 Manchester Dr
> Mount Kisco, NY 10549
> AGE 51 Years

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/275659_100000408793494...

http://www.hfunderground.com/w/images/thumb/3/3c/Bozo_fest.jpg/300p...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/28334187@N07/2643592443/
JAY SMILKSTEIN / bozo de niro

Plaintiff: WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Index No: 541-07
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY
(More Information Below)

Jay A. Smilkstein
105 Manchester Drive,
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
@ Corner Of Marion Avenue
3.0 Bedroom
1.5 Bath
$ 480 K

914-666-6811 <------ 666 (Mark of Beast)

Everyone is jumping ship, (voyage of the damned) getting out.
Harry & Jay's Glory Hole home neighbors:
111 Manchester Drive, Mount Kisco, NY
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/111-Manchester-Dr-Mount-Kisco-NY-...

I just want to say here that my father Harry Smilkstein is still
alive at 99 years old, and in no way is my life a re-play of that
PSYCHO movie where my parent is dead in a room.
My father Harry Smilkstein is proud of me and he stands by me
and everything I do on the internet, harassing people on a vast
scale all over the world and especially New York.

I am beautiful:
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/07012011.jpg
WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

I STILL LIVE WITH DADDY JEW
I AM BOZO (Jay Smilkstein)

Jay A Smilkstein
AGE: 51 years old

RELATIVES:
Harry Smilkstein
Address:
105 Manchester Dr
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
(914) 666-6811
Mount Kisco, NY
AGE: 99 years old

Jay A Smilkstein
Address :
105 Manchester Dr
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
(914) 666-6811
Mount Kisco, NY
AGE 51 Years

Bozo's Mt. Kisko address is: 105 Manchester Drive
Mount Kisco, NY
914-666-6811

AMAZING THE JEW HAS A 666 PHONE NUMBER !
THE MARK OF THE BEAST !

Bozo ---> WIKIPEDIA Created A Page Because
The Jew Pest Jay Smilkstein, Is
A Notorious AntiChrist Satan Kike
Who Bothers Jew York Radio Stations
With His Angst To Promote Satanic
Judaic Bolshevik Pornographic Hassidics

WIKIPEDIA
http://www.hfunderground.com/wiki/Bozo
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BDN00/

Plaintiff: BOURICIOUS WILLARD BOURICIOUS WILLARD Index No:
10830-04
Defendant: SMILKSTEIN JAY SMILKSTEIN JAY Add. Info: CONTRACT