"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t458p4$2l7c$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...

>
> So SP thinks.
>
> Devices are not event?

You've got major problems with the English language, Yads. No wonder you
talk such gibberish.

solar penguin wrote on 25/4/22 4:20 pm> Binky bleated:
>> In article <t44l0d$5ci$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Binky bleated:
>>>> In article <t44jis$s4q$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>> In article <t447sc$57k$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cp /dev/null /dev/<first hard drive>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That’s _not_ what you posted before. Make up your mind!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is an event.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar! That’s not an event!
>>>>
>>>> Got a Win11 machine SP?
>>>
>>> Even if I did, it still wouldn’t be an event.
>>>
>>> Even if I owned all the Win11 machines in the world, it wouldn’t
>>> make any difference!
>>>
>>> In computer programming terms, an event is something that’s
>>> handled by an event handler.
>>>
>>> e.g. If you’re programming a in an object-oriented language, you
>>> could make one of your program objects react to the mouse by
>>> giving it an event handler like:
>>>
>>> on_rightmouseclick(): { whatever }
>>>
>>> But there’s no language with any such handler as:
>>>
>>> on_/dev/null(): { whatever }
>>>
>>> And why not? Because /dev/null isn’t an event. That’s why!
>>
>> So SP thinks.
>>
>> Devices are not event?
>
> That’s right. They’re “not event.” They’re devices.

I'm no expert, but I would think if something was a 'Device', it would
be a 'Device'!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 24/4/22 4:21 am:
> In article <t4100e$mub$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 23/4/22 12:53 am:
>>> In article <t3tls1$j6q$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> I have used Unix in the past, and so I’ve heard of
>>>> /dev/null. But IIRC it isn’t an event. It’s a
>>>> dummy file/directory/device thing. Not an event.
>>>
>>> But is can be made into an event!
>>
>> How do YOU, clown, or anyone, turn a location (/dev/null) into an
>> event, clown??
>>
>> (This should be interesting ...... NOT!!)

> cp /dev/null ....

O.K., my very limited knowledge of Linux/Unix, "cp /dev/null ... " is
merely *COPYING* whatever is in/at /dev/null to some unspecified location.

Am I missing something??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 25/4/22 2:46 pm:
> In article <0384f4fb-cb00-4622-b3f2-ed8fa98e4f8bn@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 3:53:31 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>> <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> Still not answering the question! Did you threaten to overrule
>>>> h...
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I mean: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get
>>>> involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>
>>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>>>
>>> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>>
>> In which DW episode(s) did she appear?
>
>
> No in DW, GJ!

"GJ"??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 25/4/22 8:53 am:
> In article <t44k28$vc5$2@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>> Still not answering the question! Did you threaten to overrule
>> h...
>>
>> Sorry, I mean: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get
>> involved in a lesbian relationship?
>
> Yes because of Chibnall.
>
> Sort of like Anne Lister.

Hmm! Is Anne Lister related to Dave Lister??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

Binky bleated:

> In article <t44k28$vc5$2@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Still not answering the question! Did you threaten to overrule h...
>>
>> Sorry, I mean: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>
>
> Yes because of Chibnall.

Well done! You’ve finally managed to answer the question!
See, it wasn’t that hard after all.

>
> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>

Liar! She couldn’t’ve suspected anything about the Whittaker
era because she was already dead before DW started!

--
solar penguin

"solar penguin" <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:t467s1$ppp$1@dont-email.me...
>
> Binky bleated:
>
>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Still not answering the question! Did you threaten to overrule h...
>>>
>>> Sorry, I mean: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>
>>
>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>
> Well done! You've finally managed to answer the question!
> See, it wasn't that hard after all.

He answered the question, yes. But he didn't answer it honestly. He didn't
have a clue that there would be any sort of "lesbian relationship". He just
knew he was going to hate anything Chibnall did, because Aggy told him to.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t46914$1efs$12@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t45ik3$ks9$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t44kbe$3bd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t44jis$s4q$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t447sc$57k$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cp /dev/null /dev/<first hard drive>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That�?Ts _not_ what you posted before. Make up your mind!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That is an event.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Liar! That�?Ts not an event!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Got a Win11 machine SP?
>>
>>You're an idiot, Yads. Windows 11 is an operating system. It's not a
>>machine.
>>
>>
>
> Still have an Ego bigger than your IQ, SW?

Gibberish.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t4692f$1efs$13@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t45im9$li7$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t44kd9$3bd$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t3rh5q$42i$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <t3pma7$fq6$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <t3oa7m$8st$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t3nc29$pf1$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might
>>>>>>>>>>>> get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Answer, �?oYes, I did,�?� or �?oNo, I didn�?Tt.�?�
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> SP ever visitied /dev/null?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why? Would I find your answer there?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No you got the idea!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I didn�?Tt get an answer!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Timelss child is a /dev/null event!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And if you were asked for an example of a /dev/null event
>>>>>>>> that would be an answer. (A wrong answer, but still an
>>>>>>>> answer.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But you weren�?Tt asked about /dev/null events. So it isn�?Tt
>>>>>>>> even an answer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Try again:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try again, again:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Timeless Child is a /dev/null event!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That _still_ isn�?Tt a valid answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You weren�?Tt asked about /dev/null events. You were asked
>>>>>> about you noticing things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See the difference!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now have one last go, and see if you can manage it.
>>>>>> Remember to answer �?oYes, I did,�?� or �?oNo, I didn�?Tt.�?�
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get
>>>>>>>>>> involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Answer, �?oYes, I did,�?� or �?oNo, I didn�?Tt.�?�
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Timeless Child is a /dev/null event!
>>>>>
>>>>> That i what the true diehrat DW fan notices!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Still not answering the question! Did you threaten to overrule h...
>>>>
>>>>Sorry, I mean: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get involved
>>>>in
>>>>a lesbian relationship?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>>>
>>> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>>
>>Liar! Chibnall is nothing like Anne Lister.
>>
>>
>
> OH? The Doctor is Gentleman Jack under chibnall1

Liar. The Doctor is the Doctor.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t4693g$1efs$14@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t45ioj$m2c$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t458p4$2l7c$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>
>>>
>>> So SP thinks.
>>>
>>> Devices are not event?
>>
>>You've got major problems with the English language, Yads. No wonder you
>>talk such gibberish.
>>
>>
>
> So s nuke going of is not an event according to SP and SW!

You're an idiot, Yads. A nuclear bomb is a device. A nuclear bomb detonating
is an event.

Binky bleated:

> In article <t45ioj$m2c$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> You've got major problems with the English language,
>> Yads. No wonder you talk such gibberish.
>>
>
> So s nuke going of is not an event according to SP and SW!

Oh, the irony!

--
solar penguin

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t46bb1$1efs$87@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t46aal$e3g$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t46914$1efs$12@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t45ik3$ks9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:t44kbe$3bd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>> In article <t44jis$s4q$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <t447sc$57k$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> cp /dev/null /dev/<first hard drive>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That�?Ts _not_ what you posted before. Make up your mind!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is an event.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Liar! That�?Ts not an event!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Got a Win11 machine SP?
>>>>
>>>>You're an idiot, Yads. Windows 11 is an operating system. It's not a
>>>>machine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Still have an Ego bigger than your IQ, SW?
>>
>>Gibberish.
>>
>>
>
> SW confirms his ego is bigger than his IQ!

Gibberish.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t46bc9$1efs$89@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t46adh$eu7$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t4693g$1efs$14@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t45ioj$m2c$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:t458p4$2l7c$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So SP thinks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Devices are not event?
>>>>
>>>>You've got major problems with the English language, Yads. No wonder you
>>>>talk such gibberish.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> So s nuke going of is not an event according to SP and SW!
>>
>>You're an idiot, Yads. A nuclear bomb is a device. A nuclear bomb
>>detonating
>>is an event.
>>
>>
>
> Thus the event is triggered by a device.

It can be. But the device is not the event.

Binky bleated:

> In article <t46anm$hfo$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t45ioj$m2c$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You've got major problems with the English language,
>>>> Yads. No wonder you talk such gibberish.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So s nuke going of is not an event according to SP
>>> and SW!
>>
>> Oh, the irony!
>>
>
> You got the idea!
>

**WHOOOOSH!!!**

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t467s1$ppp$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>>
>> Well done! You’ve finally managed to answer the question!
>> See, it wasn’t that hard after all.
>>
>>>
>>> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>>>
>>
>> Liar! She couldn’t’ve suspected anything about the
>> Whittaker era because she was already dead before
>> DW started!
>>
>
> Don't see the parallel, SP?
>

Not really. Can you explain it?

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 12:12 am:
> In article <t46025$on3$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> solar penguin wrote on 25/4/22 4:20 pm> Binky bleated:
>>>> In article <t44l0d$5ci$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>> In article <t44jis$s4q$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>> In article <t447sc$57k$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> cp /dev/null /dev/<first hard drive>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That’s _not_ what you posted before. Make up your mind!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is an event.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Liar! That’s not an event!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Got a Win11 machine SP?
>>>>>
>>>>> Even if I did, it still wouldn’t be an event.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even if I owned all the Win11 machines in the world, it wouldn’t
>>>>> make any difference!
>>>>>
>>>>> In computer programming terms, an event is something that’s
>>>>> handled by an event handler.
>>>>>
>>>>> e.g. If you’re programming a in an object-oriented language, you
>>>>> could make one of your program objects react to the mouse by
>>>>> giving it an event handler like:
>>>>>
>>>>> on_rightmouseclick(): { whatever }
>>>>>
>>>>> But there’s no language with any such handler as:
>>>>>
>>>>> on_/dev/null(): { whatever }
>>>>>
>>>>> And why not? Because /dev/null isn’t an event. That’s why!
>>>>
>>>> So SP thinks.
>>>>
>>>> Devices are not event?
>>>
>>> That’s right. They’re “not event.” They’re devices.
>>
>> I'm no expert, but I would think if something was a 'Device', it would
>> be a 'Device'!!
>
> It can be an event!
>
No, a device might have an event happen to it, but a device cannot be an
event, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 26/4/22 7:49 am:
> 169 13 13 On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 7:15:15 AM UTC-7, The Other
> Doctor wrote:
>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> news:t4693g$1efs$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t45ioj$m2c$1...@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
>>> <stephen.wils...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>> news:t458p4$2l7c$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>
>>>>> So SP thinks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Devices are not event?
>>>>
>>>> You've got major problems with the English language, Yads. No
>>>> wonder you talk such gibberish.
>>>
>>> So s nuke going of is not an event according to SP and SW!
>> You're an idiot, Yads. A nuclear bomb is a device. A nuclear bomb
>> detonating is an event.
>
> 40% of Russians favor their government detonating nuclear devices.

If I were in Russia, I would definitely be part of the 51%!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 12:00 am:
> In article <289e6c7f-6792-4a53-88cd-d9d887c4ff55n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 7:09:31 AM UTC-7, solar penguin
>> wrote:
>>> Binky bleated:
>>>> In article <t3uulj$t95$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>> <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>> In article <t3tls1$j6q$1...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>> <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>> In article <t3rhcn$5i1$1...@dont-email.me>, solar
>>>>>>>> penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Tim typed:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 12:18:34 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>>>> solar penguin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Timelss child is a /dev/null event!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And if you were asked for an example of a /
>>>>>>>>>>> dev/null event that would be an answer. (A wrong
>>>>>>>>>>> answer, but still an answer.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What would be an example of a right answer to the
>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null event Q?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> “Nothing because there are no such things as
>>>>>>>>> /dev/null events. Binky made them up.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Never working in Unix I see, SP!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have used Unix in the past, and so I’ve heard of
>>>>>>> /dev/null. But IIRC it isn’t an event. It’s a dummy
>>>>>>> file/directory/device thing. Not an event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But is can be made into an event!
>>>>>
>>>>> How?
>>>>
>>>> Says goodbye to your Unix machine!
>>> Gibberish!
>>
>> dev/null destroys computers?
>
> IT could.

BULLSHIT, clown!! It might (MIGHT) stop the computer from functioning
but it would not (NEVER) destroy the computer, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 12:13 am:
> In article <t460o6$rtb$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 25/4/22 2:46 pm:
>>> In article <0384f4fb-cb00-4622-b3f2-ed8fa98e4f8bn@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 3:53:31 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>> <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>> Still not answering the question! Did you threaten to overrule
>>>>>> h...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, I mean: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get
>>>>>> involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>>>>
>>>> In which DW episode(s) did she appear?
>>>
>>>
>>> No in DW, GJ!
>>
>> "GJ"??
>
> Gentleman Jack.

So, YOU, clown, think Anne Lister portrayed 'Gentleman Jack' in "Doctor
Who"!!

Really??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

solar penguin wrote on 26/4/22 3:46 pm:
> Binky bleated:
>> In article <t467s1$ppp$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Binky bleated:
>>>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>
>>>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>>>
>>> Well done! You’ve finally managed to answer the question!
>>> See, it wasn’t that hard after all.
>>>>
>>>> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>>>
>>> Liar! She couldn’t’ve suspected anything about the
>>> Whittaker era because she was already dead before
>>> DW started!
>>
>> Don't see the parallel, SP?
>
> Not really. Can you explain it?

I'm betting 'NO' .... at least not in any manner that 'we' understand!!
--
Daniel

"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
news:t48m9q$hff$3@dont-email.me...
> solar penguin wrote on 26/4/22 3:46 pm:
>> Binky bleated:
>>> In article <t467s1$ppp$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>>>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>>>>
>>>> Well done! You've finally managed to answer the question!
>>>> See, it wasn't that hard after all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>>>>
>>>> Liar! She couldn't've suspected anything about the
>>>> Whittaker era because she was already dead before
>>>> DW started!
>>>
>>> Don't see the parallel, SP?
>>
>> Not really. Can you explain it?
>
> I'm betting 'NO' .... at least not in any manner that 'we' understand!!

My guess is he's recently been to his "church" and heard a talk which
mentioned Anne Lister. They probably accused Anne of being the root of all
evil today (she had lesbian affairs back in the 19th century). And therefore
Yads thinks she must be the same as the 13th Doctor.

"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
news:t48m2u$hff$2@dont-email.me...
> The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 12:13 am:
>> In article <t460o6$rtb$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/4/22 2:46 pm:
>>>> In article <0384f4fb-cb00-4622-b3f2-ed8fa98e4f8bn@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 3:53:31 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>> <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>>>>> Still not answering the question! Did you threaten to overrule
>>>>>>> h...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, I mean: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get
>>>>>>> involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>>>>>
>>>>> In which DW episode(s) did she appear?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No in DW, GJ!
>>>
>>> "GJ"??
>>
>> Gentleman Jack.
>
> So, YOU, clown, think Anne Lister portrayed 'Gentleman Jack' in "Doctor
> Who"!!

Who knows what he thinks? However, Anne Lister was nicknamed Gentleman Jack.
Yads probably thinks he's being clever.

Binky bleated:

> In article <t480vf$hh$2@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t467s1$ppp$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>>>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>>>>
>>>> Well done! You’ve finally managed to answer the question!
>>>> See, it wasn’t that hard after all.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Liar! She couldn’t’ve suspected anything about the
>>>> Whittaker era because she was already dead before
>>>> DW started!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Don't see the parallel, SP?
>>>
>>
>> Not really. Can you explain it?
>>
>
> Anne Lister wants to be a man,

Liar! She’s dead. She doesn’t want anything any more.

> Same with the Jodie Whittaker "Doctor".
>

Liar! She’s perfectly happy as a woman!

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t48soj$8sa$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t480vf$hh$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t467s1$ppp$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <t44k28$vc5$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>>>>>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes because of Chibnall.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well done! You’ve finally managed to answer the question!
>>>>>> See, it wasn’t that hard after all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sort of like Anne Lister.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Liar! She couldn’t’ve suspected anything about the
>>>>>> Whittaker era because she was already dead before
>>>>>> DW started!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't see the parallel, SP?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not really. Can you explain it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Anne Lister wants to be a man,
>>
>> Liar! She’s dead. She doesn’t want anything any more.
>>
>>> Same with the Jodie Whittaker "Doctor".
>>>
>>
>> Liar! She’s perfectly happy as a woman!
>>
>
> A la Gentleman Jack!
>

Gibberish.

But even if it did make sense, it would contradict your
previous post.

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 26/04/2022 11:42 pm:
> In article <t48les$aa9$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 12:12 am:
>>> In article <t46025$on3$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> solar penguin wrote on 25/4/22 4:20 pm> Binky bleated:
>>>>>> In article <t44l0d$5ci$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>> Devices are not event?
>>>>>
>>>>> That’s right. They’re “not event.”
>> They’re devices.
>>>>
>>>> I'm no expert, but I would think if something was a 'Device',
>>>> it would be a 'Device'!!
>>>
>>> It can be an event!
>>>
>> No, a device might have an event happen to it, but a device cannot
>> be an event, clown!!

> Nuclear Explosion by nuclear bomd, there, Dannyboy.

"bomd"??

A Nuclear Bomb is a Device that has a Nuclear Explosion, the event,
happen to it, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel