Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Friends may come and go, but enemies accumulate. -- Thomas Jones


arts / rec.arts.sf.written / Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)

SubjectAuthor
* [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Quadibloc
+- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)pete...@gmail.com
+* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Kevrob
|`- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Quadibloc
+* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)WolfFan
|+* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Ninapenda Jibini
||`* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)WolfFan
|| +- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Ninapenda Jibini
|| `* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)rkshullat
||  +* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)WolfFan
||  |+* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Chris Buckley
||  ||+- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Paul S Person
||  ||`* [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Titus G
||  || +* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  || |`* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Robert Carnegie
||  || | `* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  || |  `* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.pete...@gmail.com
||  || |   +* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Scott Lurndal
||  || |   |`- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Gary R. Schmidt
||  || |   +* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  || |   |+* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  || |   ||`- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  || |   |`- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  || |   `* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  || |    `- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  || +* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Jack Bohn
||  || |+* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Scott Lurndal
||  || ||`* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
||  || || `* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Titus G
||  || ||  +- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Paul S Person
||  || ||  +* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Joe Pfeiffer
||  || ||  |`- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Titus G
||  || ||  `- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
||  || |`- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Don
||  || +* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Chris Buckley
||  || |+* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.pete...@gmail.com
||  || ||`- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Titus G
||  || |+- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Paul S Person
||  || |`- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Titus G
||  || +* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Scott Lurndal
||  || |`- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Titus G
||  || +- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Paul S Person
||  || +- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Joe Pfeiffer
||  || `* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Dorothy J Heydt
||  ||  `* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  ||   `* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.pete...@gmail.com
||  ||    `* Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Quadibloc
||  ||     `- Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.Paul S Person
||  |`- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)The Horny Goat
||  `- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Hamish Laws
|`* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Quadibloc
| `- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Ninapenda Jibini
+* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Dorothy J Heydt
|+* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Scott Lurndal
||`* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Paul S Person
|| +- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
|| `- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Dorothy J Heydt
|+* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Paul S Person
||+- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
||+- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Quadibloc
||+* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Dorothy J Heydt
|||`* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)The Horny Goat
||| `- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Quadibloc
||`* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)The Horny Goat
|| `- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Paul S Person
|`* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Quadibloc
| `* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Paul S Person
|  +- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Quadibloc
|  `* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Dorothy J Heydt
|   `* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Robert Carnegie
|    +- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)pete...@gmail.com
|    +- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Quadibloc
|    +* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Paul S Person
|    |+- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)pete...@gmail.com
|    |`- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Dimensional Traveler
|    `* Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Dorothy J Heydt
|     `- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Paul S Person
`- Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)Quadibloc

Pages:1234
Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)

<3c10f9cd-4004-475b-8807-be2365e642can@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=83498&group=rec.arts.sf.written#83498

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:908:b0:6fc:c237:be0e with SMTP id v8-20020a05620a090800b006fcc237be0emr554101qkv.213.1672058480701;
Mon, 26 Dec 2022 04:41:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:b020:b0:14f:9d87:3d58 with SMTP id
y32-20020a056870b02000b0014f9d873d58mr995905oae.108.1672058480436; Mon, 26
Dec 2022 04:41:20 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 04:41:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <tm57mg$het8$2@memoryalpha.rosettacon.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.169.156.149; posting-account=EJyruwoAAABsD3eA_NNkpwHg3OmdgHQ3
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.169.156.149
References: <3623f41d-9881-49ec-80aa-18f5e5f6b2a1n@googlegroups.com>
<0001HW.29329EE700566E5C70000123C38F@news.supernews.com> <XnsAF5B807255980taustincagmailcom@85.12.62.245>
<0001HW.2933BA110098CB9F70000201338F@news.supernews.com> <tm57mg$het8$2@memoryalpha.rosettacon.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3c10f9cd-4004-475b-8807-be2365e642can@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)
From: hamish.l...@gmail.com (Hamish Laws)
Injection-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 12:41:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3342
 by: Hamish Laws - Mon, 26 Dec 2022 12:41 UTC

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 2:18:05 AM UTC+11, rksh...@rosettacondot..com wrote:
> WolfFan <akwo...@zoho.com> wrote:
> >
> > Of course, if idiots wouldn’t pay $1500 for a video card, none of this
> > would matter.

How much do you spend on books a year?
If people want a high-end graphics card because they enjoy playing games that's their business.

>> The video card in my main Windows box cost $150.

And that would go terribly playing modern games.

>>The entire box
> > that I’m typing this on right now cost $1200, including upgrading the RAM,
> > and Apple stuff is supposed to be expensive. There is no way that I’d spend
> > $1500 on a video card. Ain’t happening... unless it’s a _pro_ video card,
> > to do actual work which makes actual money.

Which is fine for you, it won't work for people who want to play games.

>> Note that crypto Ponzi crap

Learn what a ponzi scheme actually is.

> I'm guessing you're not a gamer. I lost my previous video card at the height
> of the crypto craze and ended up having to pay $769 for a comparable
> replacement. While I personally wouldn't sink $1500 into a card I can easily
> see serious gamers doing it (the really serious ones would probably go dual).

Nah, very few games support dual graphics cards anymore

> I'm still running on dual 1080p monitors, so I'm definitely not in the
> "serious gamer" category.

Most people are gaming at "2K" resolution now, 4K is generally not seen as worthwhile but the top end NVidia cards will do it impressively if people want to - with live raytracing

> In a lot of ways it's like audio. My audiophile friends sink more into
> individual speakers than I have invested in all of my A/V equipment combined.
>
So long as they aren't paying ludicrous amounts for some of the cabling

Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)

<ad7bd2ee-ea88-4acd-8b59-a275fcc19099n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=83572&group=rec.arts.sf.written#83572

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9207:0:b0:6ff:afd8:f08e with SMTP id u7-20020a379207000000b006ffafd8f08emr1900237qkd.337.1672441460373;
Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:04:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:494c:b0:14c:96f6:c16e with SMTP id
fl12-20020a056870494c00b0014c96f6c16emr1623536oab.111.1672441459990; Fri, 30
Dec 2022 15:04:19 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:04:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3623f41d-9881-49ec-80aa-18f5e5f6b2a1n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=162.157.97.93; posting-account=1nOeKQkAAABD2jxp4Pzmx9Hx5g9miO8y
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.157.97.93
References: <3623f41d-9881-49ec-80aa-18f5e5f6b2a1n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ad7bd2ee-ea88-4acd-8b59-a275fcc19099n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [OT] The Return of Star Wars (Graphics Cards)
From: jsav...@ecn.ab.ca (Quadibloc)
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 23:04:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1638
 by: Quadibloc - Fri, 30 Dec 2022 23:04 UTC

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 2:21:00 PM UTC-7, Quadibloc wrote:

> Making Russia's (and China's) nuclear arsenals "impotent and
> obsolete" would be all very well if we could do it. It would be helpful
> to Ukraine and Taiwan.

Apparently there may be an easier way to bring Vladimir Putin
to justice.

We just have to pray that someday he will forget to recycle his
pizza boxes.

(Andrew Tate and Greta Thunberg, in case you're wondering about
the reference.)

John Savard

Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.

<2a4c759c-df53-4d19-a4de-4cecc651df59n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=83573&group=rec.arts.sf.written#83573

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6c81:0:b0:702:1fee:571d with SMTP id h123-20020a376c81000000b007021fee571dmr1219423qkc.253.1672441669467;
Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:07:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:4e48:b0:14f:bfad:19d3 with SMTP id
uj8-20020a0568714e4800b0014fbfad19d3mr1467918oab.65.1672441669171; Fri, 30
Dec 2022 15:07:49 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:07:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8e7eb827-0f4f-4981-a5ec-4b3eb655df8an@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=162.157.97.93; posting-account=1nOeKQkAAABD2jxp4Pzmx9Hx5g9miO8y
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.157.97.93
References: <3623f41d-9881-49ec-80aa-18f5e5f6b2a1n@googlegroups.com>
<0001HW.29329EE700566E5C70000123C38F@news.supernews.com> <XnsAF5B807255980taustincagmailcom@85.12.62.245>
<0001HW.2933BA110098CB9F70000201338F@news.supernews.com> <tm57mg$het8$2@memoryalpha.rosettacon.com>
<0001HW.29378D60017E4FC970000766C38F@news.supernews.com> <jupbg2F8m0nU1@mid.individual.net>
<tm9d3b$2o7n5$1@dont-email.me> <69fe06da-22e1-4d44-b831-da6933fc86b1n@googlegroups.com>
<82aecfba-6873-404d-8968-a7a5ac10882dn@googlegroups.com> <613513e7-7c80-48a6-82da-5984c3f22fcbn@googlegroups.com>
<0aae72af-ce46-48dc-a29b-a5802c88664fn@googlegroups.com> <e1a63484-3aa8-4613-a0f2-b1003819854an@googlegroups.com>
<8e7eb827-0f4f-4981-a5ec-4b3eb655df8an@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2a4c759c-df53-4d19-a4de-4cecc651df59n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [OT] Dumb Spider Question.
From: jsav...@ecn.ab.ca (Quadibloc)
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 23:07:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2526
 by: Quadibloc - Fri, 30 Dec 2022 23:07 UTC

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 4:17:33 PM UTC-7, Quadibloc wrote:

> The section "Random number generation" by Jack Moshman
> from Volume 2 of Mathematical Methods for Digital
> Computers provides a bit more of the quote:

> "anyone who consideres arithmetical methods of producing
> random digits is, of course, in a state of sin. For, as has been
> pointed out several times, there is no such thing as a random
> number - there are only methods to produce random numbers,
> and a strict arithmetic procedure of course is not such a
> method."

And here

https://dilbert.com/strip/2001-10-25

is a Dilbert comic strip that addresses this profound philosophical
question!!!

John Savard

Pages:1234
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor