On 1/12/2023 10:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 8:32 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Noddy wrote:
>
>>> You have this fucked up idea in your head that just because someone
>>> has commented about themselves in a newsgroup that they're
>>> automatically compelled to prove it to be true to all and sundry. I
>>> have no idea where you get this bullshit from, but okay.
>>>
>>> Presumably you're planning on asking Jerky and Teacher to present
>>> their qualifications for all to see some time soon?
>>>
>>
>> nope, because I take them at their word, and besides both have anyway
>
> I see. So, the next time you strut around here jerking your soft on

The only person *strutting* here, Darren, is *you*. Whether you have a
soft on or a hard on, I don't really care - but what I do know is you
don't have *balls*!

> about how you have an unbised, open mind and are capable of independent
> thought, I'll just remind you of this hypocritical bullshit you've
> posted right here.

Err, he has an unbiased mind. The difference - for you - is that Clocky
and I had the *balls* to front up with proof of claims *we made*. No
bias needed or warranted Darren, Felix has clapped his eyes on the proof.
>
> I'm a Fucking idiot :)
>

Here, I fixed your line above.

Oh, and how about some proof of *your claims*. It's well past due!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

Xeno wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 10:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 1/12/2023 8:32 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>> You have this fucked up idea in your head that just because someone
>>>> has commented about themselves in a newsgroup that they're
>>>> automatically compelled to prove it to be true to all and sundry. I
>>>> have no idea where you get this bullshit from, but okay.
>>>>
>>>> Presumably you're planning on asking Jerky and Teacher to present
>>>> their qualifications for all to see some time soon?
>>>>
>>>
>>> nope, because I take them at their word, and besides both have anyway
>>
>> I see. So, the next time you strut around here jerking your soft on
>
> The only person *strutting* here, Darren, is *you*. Whether you have a
> soft on or a hard on, I don't really care - but what I do know is you
> don't have *balls*!
>
>> about how you have an unbised, open mind and are capable of
>> independent thought, I'll just remind you of this hypocritical
>> bullshit you've posted right here.
>
> Err, he has an unbiased mind. The difference - for you - is that
> Clocky and I had the *balls* to front up with proof of claims *we
> made*. No bias needed or warranted Darren, Felix has clapped his eyes
> on the proof.
>>
>> I'm a Fucking idiot :)
>>
>
> Here, I fixed your line above.

you did!

>
> Oh, and how about some proof of *your claims*. It's well past due!
>

can't prove what he doesn't have  :)

--
Have a nice day!..

On 1/12/2023 7:58 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 1/12/2023 3:18 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 1/12/2023 9:51 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:37 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:01 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But you're not going to show them are you, so you expect us
>>>>>>>>>>> to believe you sight unseen.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> who is us? I don't care if you believe me or not. those who
>>>>>>>>>> know and/or trust me will.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Init funny how when you apply that logic to *yourself* you see
>>>>>>>>> it as being completely rational and don't understand why anyone
>>>>>>>>> else would think otherwise, but if I do exactly the same thing
>>>>>>>>> it's a crime that needs to be investigated by Interpol :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As I understand felix, he is willing to show his proof to people
>>>>>>>> he trusts. This of course rules out you and the Enablers. Is
>>>>>>>> that correct felix?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> no, I'm just saying those who trust me will take me at my word.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is good enough for me as you don't have the long and
>>>>>> inglorious history of dishonesty, unapologetic bullshit and
>>>>>> cretinous abuse that surrounds the Fraudster like a particularly
>>>>>> rancid fart.
>>>>>>
>>>>> And is why Felix got to review *my proof*.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, and you know it won't be plastered all over the internet
>>>
>>> exactly
>>>
>>>> which is exactly what the fraud and co. would do. They have form
>>>> after all.
>>>
>>> yes. remember grubby's rapture when he thought he had a video of me?
>>>
>> Don't get too cocky,
>
> what cocky? just stating fact
>
>> things are known about you.
>>>
>>
>
> oh really? please enlighten me via email.. keefy@ausnet.info. if you
> don't, I'll assume you're talking bullshit
>
I do do things out in the open not secretly somewhere in the background
like the team does.

Your address is known.

On 1/12/2023 7:55 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 1/12/2023 10:42 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> alvey wrote:
>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:01 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> But you're not going to show them are you, so you expect us to
>>>>>>> believe you sight unseen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> who is us? I don't care if you believe me or not. those who know
>>>>>> and/or trust me will.
>>>>>
>>>>> Init funny how when you apply that logic to *yourself* you see it
>>>>> as being completely rational and don't understand why anyone else
>>>>> would think otherwise, but if I do exactly the same thing it's a
>>>>> crime that needs to be investigated by Interpol :)
>>>>
>>>> As I understand felix, he is willing to show his proof to people he
>>>> trusts. This of course rules out you and the Enablers. Is that
>>>> correct felix?
>>>>
>>>
>>> no, I'm just saying those who trust me will take me at my word. but
>>> that is not to say it can't be proven if I wished to do so. and of
>>> course as you say, Noddy and his gang wouldn't qualify as worthy
>>> recipients.
>>
>> Total cop-out, you are making a complete hypocrite of yourself. If you
>> aren't prepared to do it yourself, don't expect other to.
>>
>
> you're just too stupid to understand, even when it's been explained to
> you in great detail. but when I claim to be a qualified mechanic with
> three apprenticeships under my belt and post with authority on
> automotive matters I promise I will post evidence of them.
>
You have explicitly stated that you ran a successful business for 30
years, but you refuse to provide any information at all about it. Yet
you demand that others provide proof of what they say that they did.
That's hypocrisy.

On 1/12/2023 10:38 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>> On 1/12/2023 10:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2023 8:32 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You have this fucked up idea in your head that just because someone
>>>>> has commented about themselves in a newsgroup that they're
>>>>> automatically compelled to prove it to be true to all and sundry. I
>>>>> have no idea where you get this bullshit from, but okay.
>>>>>
>>>>> Presumably you're planning on asking Jerky and Teacher to present
>>>>> their qualifications for all to see some time soon?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> nope, because I take them at their word, and besides both have anyway
>>>
>>> I see. So, the next time you strut around here jerking your soft on
>>
>> The only person *strutting* here, Darren, is *you*. Whether you have a
>> soft on or a hard on, I don't really care - but what I do know is you
>> don't have *balls*!
>>
>>> about how you have an unbised, open mind and are capable of
>>> independent thought, I'll just remind you of this hypocritical
>>> bullshit you've posted right here.
>>
>> Err, he has an unbiased mind. The difference - for you - is that
>> Clocky and I had the *balls* to front up with proof of claims *we
>> made*. No bias needed or warranted Darren, Felix has clapped his eyes
>> on the proof.
>>>
>>> I'm a Fucking idiot :)
>>>
>>
>> Here, I fixed your line above.
>
> you did!
>
>>
>> Oh, and how about some proof of *your claims*. It's well past due!
>>
>
> can't prove what he doesn't have  :)
>
But I'm allowed to ask! ;-)

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

Keithr0 wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 7:58 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2023 3:18 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 1/12/2023 9:51 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:37 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:01 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But you're not going to show them are you, so you expect us
>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe you sight unseen.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> who is us? I don't care if you believe me or not. those who
>>>>>>>>>>> know and/or trust me will.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Init funny how when you apply that logic to *yourself* you
>>>>>>>>>> see it as being completely rational and don't understand why
>>>>>>>>>> anyone else would think otherwise, but if I do exactly the
>>>>>>>>>> same thing it's a crime that needs to be investigated by
>>>>>>>>>> Interpol :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I understand felix, he is willing to show his proof to
>>>>>>>>> people he trusts. This of course rules out you and the
>>>>>>>>> Enablers. Is that correct felix?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> no, I'm just saying those who trust me will take me at my word.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is good enough for me as you don't have the long and
>>>>>>> inglorious history of dishonesty, unapologetic bullshit and
>>>>>>> cretinous abuse that surrounds the Fraudster like a particularly
>>>>>>> rancid fart.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And is why Felix got to review *my proof*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, and you know it won't be plastered all over the internet
>>>>
>>>> exactly
>>>>
>>>>> which is exactly what the fraud and co. would do. They have form
>>>>> after all.
>>>>
>>>> yes. remember grubby's rapture when he thought he had a video of me?
>>>>
>>> Don't get too cocky,
>>
>> what cocky? just stating fact
>>
>>> things are known about you.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> oh really? please enlighten me via email.. keefy@ausnet.info. if you
>> don't, I'll assume you're talking bullshit
>>
> I do do things out in the open not secretly somewhere in the
> background like the team does.
>
> Your address is known.

so you're a stalker then

--
Have a nice day!..

On 1/12/2023 11:12 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 7:55 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2023 10:42 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:01 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But you're not going to show them are you, so you expect us to
>>>>>>>> believe you sight unseen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> who is us? I don't care if you believe me or not. those who know
>>>>>>> and/or trust me will.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Init funny how when you apply that logic to *yourself* you see it
>>>>>> as being completely rational and don't understand why anyone else
>>>>>> would think otherwise, but if I do exactly the same thing it's a
>>>>>> crime that needs to be investigated by Interpol :)
>>>>>
>>>>> As I understand felix, he is willing to show his proof to people he
>>>>> trusts. This of course rules out you and the Enablers. Is that
>>>>> correct felix?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> no, I'm just saying those who trust me will take me at my word. but
>>>> that is not to say it can't be proven if I wished to do so. and of
>>>> course as you say, Noddy and his gang wouldn't qualify as worthy
>>>> recipients.
>>>
>>> Total cop-out, you are making a complete hypocrite of yourself. If
>>> you aren't prepared to do it yourself, don't expect other to.
>>>
>>
>> you're just too stupid to understand, even when it's been explained to
>> you in great detail. but when I claim to be a qualified mechanic with
>> three apprenticeships under my belt and post with authority on
>> automotive matters I promise I will post evidence of them.
>>
> You have explicitly stated that you ran a successful business for 30
> years, but you refuse to provide any information at all about it. Yet
> you demand that others provide proof of what they say that they did.
> That's hypocrisy.

I don't think it is. His business wasn't in automotive so irrelevant
(that word again) to discussions here.

On the other hand, my qualifications and work experience *are* relevant
to what is discussed here because it is pretty much all automotive with
a smattering of IT.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 1/12/2023 11:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 7:58 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2023 3:18 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 1/12/2023 9:51 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:37 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:01 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But you're not going to show them are you, so you expect us
>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe you sight unseen.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> who is us? I don't care if you believe me or not. those who
>>>>>>>>>>> know and/or trust me will.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Init funny how when you apply that logic to *yourself* you see
>>>>>>>>>> it as being completely rational and don't understand why
>>>>>>>>>> anyone else would think otherwise, but if I do exactly the
>>>>>>>>>> same thing it's a crime that needs to be investigated by
>>>>>>>>>> Interpol :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I understand felix, he is willing to show his proof to
>>>>>>>>> people he trusts. This of course rules out you and the
>>>>>>>>> Enablers. Is that correct felix?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> no, I'm just saying those who trust me will take me at my word.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is good enough for me as you don't have the long and
>>>>>>> inglorious history of dishonesty, unapologetic bullshit and
>>>>>>> cretinous abuse that surrounds the Fraudster like a particularly
>>>>>>> rancid fart.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And is why Felix got to review *my proof*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, and you know it won't be plastered all over the internet
>>>>
>>>> exactly
>>>>
>>>>> which is exactly what the fraud and co. would do. They have form
>>>>> after all.
>>>>
>>>> yes. remember grubby's rapture when he thought he had a video of me?
>>>>
>>> Don't get too cocky,
>>
>> what cocky? just stating fact
>>
>>> things are known about you.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> oh really? please enlighten me via email.. keefy@ausnet.info. if you
>> don't, I'll assume you're talking bullshit
>>
> I do do things out in the open not secretly somewhere in the background
> like the team does.
>
> Your address is known.

You sure of that?

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

Keithr0 wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 7:55 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2023 10:42 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:01 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But you're not going to show them are you, so you expect us to
>>>>>>>> believe you sight unseen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> who is us? I don't care if you believe me or not. those who know
>>>>>>> and/or trust me will.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Init funny how when you apply that logic to *yourself* you see it
>>>>>> as being completely rational and don't understand why anyone else
>>>>>> would think otherwise, but if I do exactly the same thing it's a
>>>>>> crime that needs to be investigated by Interpol :)
>>>>>
>>>>> As I understand felix, he is willing to show his proof to people
>>>>> he trusts. This of course rules out you and the Enablers. Is that
>>>>> correct felix?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> no, I'm just saying those who trust me will take me at my word. but
>>>> that is not to say it can't be proven if I wished to do so. and of
>>>> course as you say, Noddy and his gang wouldn't qualify as worthy
>>>> recipients.
>>>
>>> Total cop-out, you are making a complete hypocrite of yourself. If
>>> you aren't prepared to do it yourself, don't expect other to.
>>>
>>
>> you're just too stupid to understand, even when it's been explained
>> to you in great detail. but when I claim to be a qualified mechanic
>> with three apprenticeships under my belt and post with authority on
>> automotive matters I promise I will post evidence of them.
>>
> You have explicitly stated that you ran a successful business for 30
> years, but you refuse to provide any information at all about it. Yet
> you demand that others provide proof of what they say that they did.
> That's hypocrisy.

context is everything. I'm not making ANY claims relevant to posting
here like noddy is. and it was qualified mechanics here who first raised
suspicions about his claims and asked for proof. and contrary to what
you say I have not demanded anything. I have only commented on his
failure to support his claims, stalker.

--
Have a nice day!..

Xeno wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 10:38 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Xeno wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2023 10:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 1/12/2023 8:32 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> You have this fucked up idea in your head that just because
>>>>>> someone has commented about themselves in a newsgroup that
>>>>>> they're automatically compelled to prove it to be true to all and
>>>>>> sundry. I have no idea where you get this bullshit from, but okay.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Presumably you're planning on asking Jerky and Teacher to present
>>>>>> their qualifications for all to see some time soon?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> nope, because I take them at their word, and besides both have anyway
>>>>
>>>> I see. So, the next time you strut around here jerking your soft on
>>>
>>> The only person *strutting* here, Darren, is *you*. Whether you have
>>> a soft on or a hard on, I don't really care - but what I do know is
>>> you don't have *balls*!
>>>
>>>> about how you have an unbised, open mind and are capable of
>>>> independent thought, I'll just remind you of this hypocritical
>>>> bullshit you've posted right here.
>>>
>>> Err, he has an unbiased mind. The difference - for you - is that
>>> Clocky and I had the *balls* to front up with proof of claims *we
>>> made*. No bias needed or warranted Darren, Felix has clapped his
>>> eyes on the proof.
>>>>
>>>> I'm a Fucking idiot :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here, I fixed your line above.
>>
>> you did!
>>
>>>
>>> Oh, and how about some proof of *your claims*. It's well past due!
>>>
>>
>> can't prove what he doesn't have  :)
>>
> But I'm allowed to ask!  ;-)
>
>

of course you are. but note that keefy the stalker never attacks you or
anyone else here for doing so except me.

--
Have a nice day!..

Xeno wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 11:12 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 1/12/2023 7:55 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 1/12/2023 10:42 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:01 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But you're not going to show them are you, so you expect us to
>>>>>>>>> believe you sight unseen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> who is us? I don't care if you believe me or not. those who
>>>>>>>> know and/or trust me will.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Init funny how when you apply that logic to *yourself* you see
>>>>>>> it as being completely rational and don't understand why anyone
>>>>>>> else would think otherwise, but if I do exactly the same thing
>>>>>>> it's a crime that needs to be investigated by Interpol :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I understand felix, he is willing to show his proof to people
>>>>>> he trusts. This of course rules out you and the Enablers. Is that
>>>>>> correct felix?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no, I'm just saying those who trust me will take me at my word.
>>>>> but that is not to say it can't be proven if I wished to do so.
>>>>> and of course as you say, Noddy and his gang wouldn't qualify as
>>>>> worthy recipients.
>>>>
>>>> Total cop-out, you are making a complete hypocrite of yourself. If
>>>> you aren't prepared to do it yourself, don't expect other to.
>>>>
>>>
>>> you're just too stupid to understand, even when it's been explained
>>> to you in great detail. but when I claim to be a qualified mechanic
>>> with three apprenticeships under my belt and post with authority on
>>> automotive matters I promise I will post evidence of them.
>>>
>> You have explicitly stated that you ran a successful business for 30
>> years, but you refuse to provide any information at all about it. Yet
>> you demand that others provide proof of what they say that they did.
>> That's hypocrisy.
>
> I don't think it is. His business wasn't in automotive so irrelevant
> (that word again) to discussions here.

of course it's not. and nor have I made any claims about it. keefy the
stalker is just obsessed with me

>
> On the other hand, my qualifications and work experience *are*
> relevant to what is discussed here because it is pretty much all
> automotive with a smattering of IT.
>

--
Have a nice day!..

Xeno wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 11:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 1/12/2023 7:58 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 1/12/2023 3:18 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 9:51 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:37 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:01 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you're not going to show them are you, so you expect
>>>>>>>>>>>>> us to believe you sight unseen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> who is us? I don't care if you believe me or not. those who
>>>>>>>>>>>> know and/or trust me will.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Init funny how when you apply that logic to *yourself* you
>>>>>>>>>>> see it as being completely rational and don't understand why
>>>>>>>>>>> anyone else would think otherwise, but if I do exactly the
>>>>>>>>>>> same thing it's a crime that needs to be investigated by
>>>>>>>>>>> Interpol :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As I understand felix, he is willing to show his proof to
>>>>>>>>>> people he trusts. This of course rules out you and the
>>>>>>>>>> Enablers. Is that correct felix?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> no, I'm just saying those who trust me will take me at my word.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is good enough for me as you don't have the long and
>>>>>>>> inglorious history of dishonesty, unapologetic bullshit and
>>>>>>>> cretinous abuse that surrounds the Fraudster like a
>>>>>>>> particularly rancid fart.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And is why Felix got to review *my proof*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed, and you know it won't be plastered all over the internet
>>>>>
>>>>> exactly
>>>>>
>>>>>> which is exactly what the fraud and co. would do. They have form
>>>>>> after all.
>>>>>
>>>>> yes. remember grubby's rapture when he thought he had a video of me?
>>>>>
>>>> Don't get too cocky,
>>>
>>> what cocky? just stating fact
>>>
>>>> things are known about you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> oh really? please enlighten me via email.. keefy@ausnet.info. if you
>>> don't, I'll assume you're talking bullshit
>>>
>> I do do things out in the open not secretly somewhere in the
>> background like the team does.
>>
>> Your address is known.
>
> You sure of that?
>
>

I doubt that he is

--
Have a nice day!..

On 1/12/2023 11:27 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>> On 1/12/2023 10:38 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 1/12/2023 10:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 1/12/2023 8:32 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have this fucked up idea in your head that just because
>>>>>>> someone has commented about themselves in a newsgroup that
>>>>>>> they're automatically compelled to prove it to be true to all and
>>>>>>> sundry. I have no idea where you get this bullshit from, but okay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Presumably you're planning on asking Jerky and Teacher to present
>>>>>>> their qualifications for all to see some time soon?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nope, because I take them at their word, and besides both have anyway
>>>>>
>>>>> I see. So, the next time you strut around here jerking your soft on
>>>>
>>>> The only person *strutting* here, Darren, is *you*. Whether you have
>>>> a soft on or a hard on, I don't really care - but what I do know is
>>>> you don't have *balls*!
>>>>
>>>>> about how you have an unbised, open mind and are capable of
>>>>> independent thought, I'll just remind you of this hypocritical
>>>>> bullshit you've posted right here.
>>>>
>>>> Err, he has an unbiased mind. The difference - for you - is that
>>>> Clocky and I had the *balls* to front up with proof of claims *we
>>>> made*. No bias needed or warranted Darren, Felix has clapped his
>>>> eyes on the proof.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm a Fucking idiot :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here, I fixed your line above.
>>>
>>> you did!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and how about some proof of *your claims*. It's well past due!
>>>>
>>>
>>> can't prove what he doesn't have  :)
>>>
>> But I'm allowed to ask!  ;-)
>>
>>
>
> of course you are. but note that keefy the stalker never attacks you or
> anyone else here for doing so except me.
>
Why doesn't he have a go at the FLCJC for not asking Darren. Oh, that's
right, they trust Darren and won't ask even though claiming trade
qualifications whilst not possessing them is fraud, pure and simple. You
want to know where the hypocrites are - they're in the FLCJC and Darren
is the biggest hypocrite of them all.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 1/12/2023 11:24 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Keithr0 wrote:

>>>>> You have explicitly stated that you ran a successful business for 30
>> years, but you refuse to provide any information at all about it. Yet
>> you demand that others provide proof of what they say that they did.
>> That's hypocrisy.
>
> context is everything. I'm not making ANY claims relevant to posting
> here like noddy is.

There *is* no "relevance" here Felix. This is a newsgroup. Not a court
of law for fuck's sake.

> and it was qualified mechanics here who first raised
> suspicions about his claims and asked for proof.

Yeah, it was. A "qualified mechanic" who can't tell the difference
between glass and plastic, and another who doesn't understand how basic
brake systems or carburetors work, and who thinks dealers alter ECU maps
to compensate for engine wear.

Oh my Gawd. I feel *so* ashamed.....

> and contrary to what you say I have not demanded anything. I have only commented on his
> failure to support his claims, stalker.

Just like you have when you claim you were a successful businessman?

Do yo know what the totally bizarre part about all this is Felix? Apart
from the uncontrollable fascination you and your fucked up mates have
about me and my life, the really funny bit is that you genuinely seem to
think that there is a legitimate distinction between me not providing
anything and you doing exactly the same thing :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 1/12/2023 11:29 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Xeno wrote:

>> I don't think it is. His business wasn't in automotive so irrelevant
>> (that word again) to discussions here.
>
> of course it's not. and nor have I made any claims about it. keefy the
> stalker is just obsessed with me

Irony.

Felix, just out of curiosity, how many posts about me have you and your
mates made today?

Take your time :)

--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 2/12/2023 12:09 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 11:29 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Xeno wrote:
>
>>> I don't think it is. His business wasn't in automotive so irrelevant
>>> (that word again) to discussions here.
>>
>> of course it's not. and nor have I made any claims about it. keefy the
>> stalker is just obsessed with me
>
>
> Irony.
>
> Felix, just out of curiosity, how many posts about me have you and your
> mates made today?

Not enough!
>
> Take your time :)
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.
>

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 1/12/2023 11:19 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Keithr0 wrote:

>> I do do things out in the open not secretly somewhere in the
>> background like the team does.
>>
>> Your address is known.
>
> so you're a stalker then

ROTFL :)

From the bloke who was *so* interested to see where I lived that he had
to email his mate on the quiet to get the address and come do a drive by :)

Hahahahahahahah :)

You couldn't write shit this funny if you *wanted* to :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 1/12/2023 10:31 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Noddy wrote:
>> On 1/12/2023 8:32 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>> You have this fucked up idea in your head that just because someone
>>>> has commented about themselves in a newsgroup that they're
>>>> automatically compelled to prove it to be true to all and sundry. I
>>>> have no idea where you get this bullshit from, but okay.
>>>>
>>>> Presumably you're planning on asking Jerky and Teacher to present
>>>> their qualifications for all to see some time soon?
>>>>
>>>
>>> nope, because I take them at their word, and besides both have anyway
>>
>> I see. So, the next time you strut around here jerking your soft on
>> about how you have an unbised, open mind and are capable of
>> independent thought, I'll just remind you of this hypocritical
>> bullshit you've posted right here.
>
> there isn't any

And in that three word sentence right there lies all the evidence anyone
need to see to show that you are totally bat shit delusional :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 2/12/2023 12:08 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 11:24 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Keithr0 wrote:
>
>>>>>> You have explicitly stated that you ran a successful business for 30
>>> years, but you refuse to provide any information at all about it. Yet
>>> you demand that others provide proof of what they say that they did.
>>> That's hypocrisy.
>>
>> context is everything. I'm not making ANY claims relevant to posting
>> here like noddy is.
>
> There *is* no "relevance" here Felix. This is a newsgroup. Not a court
> of law for fuck's sake.
>
But you were making fraudulent claims here related to your
qualifications and, on the basis of those claims, offering to work on
people's cars. That is *F-R-A-U-D* no matter how you might want to dress
it up. Claims like you are making have people making a visit to a court
of law! I daresay the VACC did a good old check on you. Hey did the VACC
ring you? Maybe that was why you suddenly stopped doing *outside work*
and decided to retire to your own cars.
>
>> and it was qualified mechanics here who first raised suspicions about
>> his claims and asked for proof.
>
> Yeah, it was. A "qualified mechanic" who can't tell the difference
> between glass and plastic, and another who doesn't understand how basic
> brake systems or carburetors work, and who thinks dealers alter ECU maps
> to compensate for engine wear.
>
> Oh my Gawd. I feel *so* ashamed.....
>
You should!
>
>> and contrary to what you say I have not demanded anything. I have only
>> commented on his failure to support his claims, stalker.
>
> Just like you have when you claim you were a successful businessman?
>
> Do yo know what the totally bizarre part about all this is Felix? Apart
> from the uncontrollable fascination you and your fucked up mates have
> about me and my life, the really funny bit is that you genuinely seem to
> think that there is a legitimate distinction between me not providing
> anything and you doing exactly the same thing :)
>
>
>

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 2/12/2023 12:13 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 10:31 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Noddy wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2023 8:32 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You have this fucked up idea in your head that just because someone
>>>>> has commented about themselves in a newsgroup that they're
>>>>> automatically compelled to prove it to be true to all and sundry. I
>>>>> have no idea where you get this bullshit from, but okay.
>>>>>
>>>>> Presumably you're planning on asking Jerky and Teacher to present
>>>>> their qualifications for all to see some time soon?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> nope, because I take them at their word, and besides both have anyway
>>>
>>> I see. So, the next time you strut around here jerking your soft on
>>> about how you have an unbised, open mind and are capable of
>>> independent thought, I'll just remind you of this hypocritical
>>> bullshit you've posted right here.
>>
>> there isn't any
>
> And in that three word sentence right there lies all the evidence anyone
> need to see to show that you are totally bat shit delusional :)
>
*M-I-R-R-O-R*

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 1/12/2023 11:27 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Xeno wrote:

>>> can't prove what he doesn't have  :)
>>>
>> But I'm allowed to ask!  ;-)
>>
>>
>
> of course you are.

Yeah. Repeatedly. Every single day like a totally unhinged fuckwit.

> but note that keefy the stalker never attacks you or
> anyone else here for doing so except me.

And here it is. That time in your "fun regime" where it suddenly stops
being fun for you and you start playing the victim.

A few more posts and you'll spit the dummy, call people "pedophiles" and
then run off to the spare bedroom where you'll beat yourself stupid with
the wand off the vacuum cleaner.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Noddy wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 11:24 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Keithr0 wrote:
>
>>>>>> You have explicitly stated that you ran a successful business for 30
>>> years, but you refuse to provide any information at all about it.
>>> Yet you demand that others provide proof of what they say that they
>>> did. That's hypocrisy.
>>
>> context is everything. I'm not making ANY claims relevant to posting
>> here like noddy is.
>
> There *is* no "relevance" here Felix. This is a newsgroup. Not a court
> of law for fuck's sake.
>
>
>> and it was qualified mechanics here who first raised suspicions about
>> his claims and asked for proof.
>
> Yeah, it was. A "qualified mechanic" who can't tell the difference
> between glass and plastic, and another who doesn't understand how
> basic brake systems or carburetors work, and who thinks dealers alter
> ECU maps to compensate for engine wear.
>
> Oh my Gawd. I feel *so* ashamed.....
>
>
>> and contrary to what you say I have not demanded anything. I have
>> only commented on his failure to support his claims, stalker.
>
> Just like you have when you claim you were a successful businessman?
>
> Do yo know what the totally bizarre part about all this is Felix?
> Apart from the uncontrollable fascination you and your fucked up mates
> have about me and my life, the really funny bit is that you genuinely
> seem to think that there is a legitimate distinction between me not
> providing anything and you doing exactly the same thing :)
>
>
>

there is. you just make excuses because you've lied about your work
experience and qualifications. correct me if I'm wrong.

--
Have a nice day!..

Noddy wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 11:19 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Keithr0 wrote:
>
>>> I do do things out in the open not secretly somewhere in the
>>> background like the team does.
>>>
>>> Your address is known.
>>
>> so you're a stalker then
>
> ROTFL :)
>
> From the bloke who was *so* interested to see where I lived that he
> had to email his mate on the quiet to get the address

another lie. I never did any such thing. your address was posted here.
it's also a matter of public record from your business registrations.

> and come do a drive by :)

another lie. I never 'drove by' your property and that was proven during
a previous discussion. I was in Bacchus Marsh and simply drove around to
see what it was like.

>
> Hahahahahahahah :)
>
> You couldn't write shit this funny if you *wanted* to :)
>
>

--
Have a nice day!..

Noddy wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 11:27 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Xeno wrote:
>
>>>> can't prove what he doesn't have  :)
>>>>
>>> But I'm allowed to ask!  ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> of course you are.
>
> Yeah. Repeatedly. Every single day like a totally unhinged fuckwit.
>
>> but note that keefy the stalker never attacks you or anyone else here
>> for doing so except me.
>
> And here it is. That time in your "fun regime" where it suddenly stops
> being fun for you and you start playing the victim.

just stating the facts, stupid

--
Have a nice day!..

Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 1/12/2023 7:58 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 1/12/2023 3:18 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 9:51 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:37 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/12/2023 12:01 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you're not going to show them are you, so you expect us
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe you sight unseen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> who is us? I don't care if you believe me or not. those who
>>>>>>>>>>>> know and/or trust me will.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Init funny how when you apply that logic to *yourself* you
>>>>>>>>>>> see it as being completely rational and don't understand why
>>>>>>>>>>> anyone else would think otherwise, but if I do exactly the
>>>>>>>>>>> same thing it's a crime that needs to be investigated by
>>>>>>>>>>> Interpol :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As I understand felix, he is willing to show his proof to
>>>>>>>>>> people he trusts. This of course rules out you and the
>>>>>>>>>> Enablers. Is that correct felix?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> no, I'm just saying those who trust me will take me at my word.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is good enough for me as you don't have the long and
>>>>>>>> inglorious history of dishonesty, unapologetic bullshit and
>>>>>>>> cretinous abuse that surrounds the Fraudster like a particularly
>>>>>>>> rancid fart.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And is why Felix got to review *my proof*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed, and you know it won't be plastered all over the internet
>>>>>
>>>>> exactly
>>>>>
>>>>>> which is exactly what the fraud and co. would do. They have form
>>>>>> after all.
>>>>>
>>>>> yes. remember grubby's rapture when he thought he had a video of me?
>>>>>
>>>> Don't get too cocky,
>>>
>>> what cocky? just stating fact
>>>
>>>> things are known about you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> oh really? please enlighten me via email.. keefy@ausnet.info. if you
>>> don't, I'll assume you're talking bullshit
>>>
>> I do do things out in the open not secretly somewhere in the
>> background like the team does.
>>
>> Your address is known.
>
> so you're a stalker then

What's this? It's not Richardson making threats is it?
Isn't that behaviour illegal now?

alvey
Thinking Richardson must be pretty unpopular with his neighbors if he
does his do do out in the open.