On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:22:29 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 28/09/2021 9:30 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 28/09/2021 10:03 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2021 8:51 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2021 4:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>
>>>> Just say "Yes" Keith. It's not like anyone actually cares :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Actually Noddy there are probably 4 self absorbed, self aggrandizing
>>> hypocrites who care.
>>>
>>> The type who would be nice to your face but stab you in the back as
>>> you walked away. Accuse you of doing things and saying things you
>>> never said. Absolute liars. Contemptible bullies. The sort that would
>>> not survive in the real world and are true keyboard warriors. Those
>>> types.
>>>
>>> The types I ignore because their opinions are not worth worrying about
>>> as I have no respect for lying bullies.
>>
>> lol! that's hilarious. to say that your grasp on reality is tenuous
>> would be the understatement of the year.
>>
>
> Not only NoddyLiar's abuse documented in countless thousands of posts
> but his own repulsive behaviour in here... as if it never happened!
>
> These people are ill.

Oh.
I thought that unhealthy yellow tinge was just cowardice.

alvey
Noting that they also have an unusual commonality of residence.

On 29/09/2021 10:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 29/09/2021 1:35 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>> hey grubby ol'son, care to name the four persons you're describing and
>> accusing of such things? or is it you who is a 'true keyboard
>> warrior'? curious minds would like to know. will you man up or run away?
>>
>>
> Start by looking in the mirror. Then look at all those you constantly
> "me too" to. BTW Calling me grubby doesn't bother me at all. I take it
> that it has hurt you so much that you have to try to bring me down, when
> in fact you're projecting your own failings.

Indeed he is. It's Felix. The *King* of the "Pick an argument and then
run away sooking when it doesn't go his way" routine. He's done it *so*
many times it's not funny. That is, when he's not calling people
"pedophiles" :)

It's as if their own behaviour is completely invisible to them :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 29/9/21 8:04 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 29/09/2021 10:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/09/2021 1:35 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> hey grubby ol'son, care to name the four persons you're describing
>>> and accusing of such things? or is it you who is a 'true keyboard
>>> warrior'? curious minds would like to know. will you man up or run away?
>>>
>>>
>> Start by looking in the mirror. Then look at all those you constantly
>> "me too" to. BTW Calling me grubby doesn't bother me at all. I take it
>> that it has hurt you so much that you have to try to bring me down,
>> when in fact you're projecting your own failings.
>
> Indeed he is. It's Felix. The *King* of the "Pick an argument and then
> run away sooking when it doesn't go his way" routine. He's done it *so*

Run away sooking? That's what *you* are doing ever since you were called
out on all your lies and self aggrandisement, ever since you were ask
for proof. It's your *didn't go your way* routine.

Such a pity there's no way you can provide proof of your trade
qualifications, that's just the way it is with *imaginary claims*.

> many times it's not funny. That is, when he's not calling people
> "pedophiles" :)
>
> It's as if their own behaviour is completely invisible to them :)

Jesus! *MORE* projection from the projection master. You're so good at
this projection caper that you even get your sycophants to project for
you as well. That really is *extreme*.

--

Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:04:51 +1000, Noddy wrote:

> On 29/09/2021 10:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/09/2021 1:35 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> hey grubby ol'son, care to name the four persons you're describing and
>>> accusing of such things? or is it you who is a 'true keyboard
>>> warrior'? curious minds would like to know. will you man up or run away?
>>>
>>>
>> Start by looking in the mirror. Then look at all those you constantly
>> "me too" to. BTW Calling me grubby doesn't bother me at all. I take it
>> that it has hurt you so much that you have to try to bring me down, when
>> in fact you're projecting your own failings.
>
> Indeed he is. It's Felix. The *King* of the "Pick an argument and then
> run away sooking when it doesn't go his way" routine. He's done it *so*
> many times it's not funny. That is, when he's not calling people
> "pedophiles" :)

Richie: Simply marrrrvellous piece of hypocrisy there from The Fraudster.

*You*, Der Der, are the most personally abusive poster I've seen in 25
years of usenet. For you to get upset, or even feign it, over *any* abuse
aimed at you, is staggering. You've also routinely stated that people who
can't take some "colourful" language in usenet are softcocks and should
leave. Then there's your proclaimations about being a hard man "with broad
shoulders", which is clearly just another lie and another log on this
raging bonfire of hypocrisy. Plus, as you regularly use phrases such as
"10yo in a treehouse", "Instead of constantly whinging about this like a
stupid little girl who's lost her Barbie doll" and of course the hilarious,
“And then runs off sooking like a little girl with sand up his vagina...”,
well... calling you a pedophile isn't an entirely baseless leap. It's wrong
to have made the accusation, but then there's more supporting evidence for
it than you've had for the hundreds of lies and slurs that you've hissed
out. Like this comedic classic for instance! "Sometimes you can tell a lot
about people from what they say Felix, and anyone who is as keen as Alvey
is to "prove himself" around here is about as smart as a teddy bear biscuit
coated in baby shit.
Hence, his net worth ain't going to be much.".

Here's some facts Der Der. You are a liar, hypocrite, fraud and coward.
Feel free to challenge any of these *facts*.

> It's as if their own behaviour is completely invisible to them :)

And a buffoon who really should add 'Mirror' to his name.

alvey
“It may come as a shock to you to learn, but when someone makes a claim
the onus falls on them to "prove" it if it is to be accepted as "true".
Fraudster, 25Mar16

On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:41:54 +1000, Xeno wrote:

> On 29/9/21 8:04 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 29/09/2021 10:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2021 1:35 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>>> hey grubby ol'son, care to name the four persons you're describing
>>>> and accusing of such things? or is it you who is a 'true keyboard
>>>> warrior'? curious minds would like to know. will you man up or run away?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Start by looking in the mirror. Then look at all those you constantly
>>> "me too" to. BTW Calling me grubby doesn't bother me at all. I take it
>>> that it has hurt you so much that you have to try to bring me down,
>>> when in fact you're projecting your own failings.
>>
>> Indeed he is. It's Felix. The *King* of the "Pick an argument and then
>> run away sooking when it doesn't go his way" routine. He's done it *so*
>
> Run away sooking? That's what *you* are doing ever since you were called
> out on all your lies and self aggrandisement, ever since you were ask
> for proof. It's your *didn't go your way* routine.
>
> Such a pity there's no way you can provide proof of your trade
> qualifications, that's just the way it is with *imaginary claims*.
>
>> many times it's not funny. That is, when he's not calling people
>> "pedophiles" :)
>>
>> It's as if their own behaviour is completely invisible to them :)
>
> Jesus! *MORE* projection from the projection master. You're so good at
> this projection caper that you even get your sycophants to project for
> you as well. That really is *extreme*.

And a waste of time.
The bulbs in his projector are too dim to be effective.

alvey

On 30/09/2021 6:12 am, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:04:51 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 29/09/2021 10:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2021 1:35 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> hey grubby ol'son, care to name the four persons you're describing and
>>>> accusing of such things? or is it you who is a 'true keyboard
>>>> warrior'? curious minds would like to know. will you man up or run away?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Start by looking in the mirror. Then look at all those you constantly
>>> "me too" to. BTW Calling me grubby doesn't bother me at all. I take it
>>> that it has hurt you so much that you have to try to bring me down, when
>>> in fact you're projecting your own failings.
>> Indeed he is. It's Felix. The *King* of the "Pick an argument and then
>> run away sooking when it doesn't go his way" routine. He's done it *so*
>> many times it's not funny. That is, when he's not calling people
>> "pedophiles" :)
> Richie: Simply marrrrvellous piece of hypocrisy there from The Fraudster.

just more his lies. I don't run from any of my comments. maybe he's
thinking of keefy or grubby? :)

>
> *You*, Der Der, are the most personally abusive poster I've seen in 25
> years of usenet. For you to get upset, or even feign it, over *any* abuse
> aimed at you, is staggering. You've also routinely stated that people who
> can't take some "colourful" language in usenet are softcocks and should
> leave. Then there's your proclaimations about being a hard man "with broad
> shoulders", which is clearly just another lie and another log on this
> raging bonfire of hypocrisy. Plus, as you regularly use phrases such as
> "10yo in a treehouse", "Instead of constantly whinging about this like a
> stupid little girl who's lost her Barbie doll" and of course the hilarious,
> “And then runs off sooking like a little girl with sand up his vagina...”,
> well... calling you a pedophile isn't an entirely baseless leap. It's wrong
> to have made the accusation,

here's the truth about the pedo thing. I was tired, I was frustrated to
the extreme, by trying discuss sensibly and rationally with the idiot,
and stupidly called him a pedo to evoke some reaction. It was a mistake.
It's wrong to accuse anyone of that even in jest. I apologized for it, I
retracted it, I stated I had no reason to think there was any evidence
for it, and he said he accepted my apology. But as is abundantly obvious
that hasn't prevented him from throwing it in my face at any
opportunity. so it's yet another example of his lack of integrity and
decency.

> but then there's more supporting evidence for
> it than you've had for the hundreds of lies and slurs that you've hissed
> out. Like this comedic classic for instance! "Sometimes you can tell a lot
> about people from what they say Felix, and anyone who is as keen as Alvey
> is to "prove himself" around here is about as smart as a teddy bear biscuit
> coated in baby shit.
> Hence, his net worth ain't going to be much.".
>
> Here's some facts Der Der. You are a liar, hypocrite, fraud and coward.
> Feel free to challenge any of these *facts*.

indeed. and those who support him like grubby, the cleaner, and the
village idiot, are now tarred with the same brush.

>
>> It's as if their own behaviour is completely invisible to them :)
> And a buffoon who really should add 'Mirror' to his name.
>
>
>
> alvey
> “It may come as a shock to you to learn, but when someone makes a claim
> the onus falls on them to "prove" it if it is to be accepted as "true".
> Fraudster, 25Mar16
>

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 30/09/2021 6:15 am, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:41:54 +1000, Xeno wrote:
>
>> On 29/9/21 8:04 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2021 10:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 29/09/2021 1:35 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> hey grubby ol'son, care to name the four persons you're describing
>>>>> and accusing of such things? or is it you who is a 'true keyboard
>>>>> warrior'? curious minds would like to know. will you man up or run away?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Start by looking in the mirror. Then look at all those you constantly
>>>> "me too" to. BTW Calling me grubby doesn't bother me at all. I take it
>>>> that it has hurt you so much that you have to try to bring me down,
>>>> when in fact you're projecting your own failings.
>>> Indeed he is. It's Felix. The *King* of the "Pick an argument and then
>>> run away sooking when it doesn't go his way" routine. He's done it *so*
>> Run away sooking? That's what *you* are doing ever since you were called
>> out on all your lies and self aggrandisement, ever since you were ask
>> for proof. It's your *didn't go your way* routine.
>>
>> Such a pity there's no way you can provide proof of your trade
>> qualifications, that's just the way it is with *imaginary claims*.
>>
>>> many times it's not funny. That is, when he's not calling people
>>> "pedophiles" :)
>>>
>>> It's as if their own behaviour is completely invisible to them :)
>> Jesus! *MORE* projection from the projection master. You're so good at
>> this projection caper that you even get your sycophants to project for
>> you as well. That really is *extreme*.
> And a waste of time.
> The bulbs in his projector are too dim to be effective.
>

LOL!

> alvey

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 30/09/2021 4:15 am, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:41:54 +1000, Xeno wrote:
>
>> On 29/9/21 8:04 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2021 10:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 29/09/2021 1:35 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>>> hey grubby ol'son, care to name the four persons you're describing
>>>>> and accusing of such things? or is it you who is a 'true keyboard
>>>>> warrior'? curious minds would like to know. will you man up or run away?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Start by looking in the mirror. Then look at all those you constantly
>>>> "me too" to. BTW Calling me grubby doesn't bother me at all. I take it
>>>> that it has hurt you so much that you have to try to bring me down,
>>>> when in fact you're projecting your own failings.
>>>
>>> Indeed he is. It's Felix. The *King* of the "Pick an argument and then
>>> run away sooking when it doesn't go his way" routine. He's done it *so*
>>
>> Run away sooking? That's what *you* are doing ever since you were called
>> out on all your lies and self aggrandisement, ever since you were ask
>> for proof. It's your *didn't go your way* routine.
>>
>> Such a pity there's no way you can provide proof of your trade
>> qualifications, that's just the way it is with *imaginary claims*.
>>
>>> many times it's not funny. That is, when he's not calling people
>>> "pedophiles" :)
>>>
>>> It's as if their own behaviour is completely invisible to them :)
>>
>> Jesus! *MORE* projection from the projection master. You're so good at
>> this projection caper that you even get your sycophants to project for
>> you as well. That really is *extreme*.
>
> And a waste of time.
> The bulbs in his projector are too dim to be effective.
>
>

Very good :-)

On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about
>>>>>>>>>>>> his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!)
>>>>>>>>>>>> has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some
>>>>>>>>>>>> of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>>> you, that was
>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them
>>>>>>>> up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I
>>>>>>>> know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz
>>>>>>>> could except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't require
>>>>>>>> noddy, a proven liar, to justify any of his claims to you?
>>>>>>>> interesting...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>>
>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed?
>>>
>>> Whatever.
>>
>>
>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>
> I choose my own options, thank you.

You only had one option to choose.
"Whatever" was just your infantile attempt at avoidance.

On 9/30/2021 7:28 PM, Clocky wrote:
> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>> has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>>>> you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me)
>>>>>>>>> also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly
>>>>>>>>> even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't
>>>>>>>>> require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any of his claims to
>>>>>>>>> you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
>>>>>> lying.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>
>>>> Whatever.
>>>
>>>
>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>
>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>
> You only had one option to choose.
> "Whatever" was just your infantile attempt at avoidance.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Here`s O'ticcy playing net cop *again!*...Lookout now!!!!. Hahaha.

--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea. Massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." — Gene
Spafford, 1992

On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>> has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>>>> you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them
>>>>>>>>> up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also
>>>>>>>>> I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even
>>>>>>>>> jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't
>>>>>>>>> require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any of his claims to
>>>>>>>>> you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
>>>>>> lying.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>
>>>> Whatever.
>>>
>>>
>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>
>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>
> You only had one option to choose.

If there is only one course of action available then there are no option
- basic logic.

However, since I don't answer to you or anybody here, I choose my own
actions.

> "Whatever" was just your infantile attempt at avoidance.

No, it was an expression of complete indifference to your obsessive
point of view. So, just move on or suck it up.

On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 22:13:03 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>>>>> you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them
>>>>>>>>>> up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also
>>>>>>>>>> I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even
>>>>>>>>>> jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't
>>>>>>>>>> require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any of his claims to
>>>>>>>>>> you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
>>>>>>> lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>
>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>
>> You only had one option to choose.
>
> If there is only one course of action available then there are no option
> - basic logic.

I will never admit that I am wrong - basic keith.

On 30/09/2021 10:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:

>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>
>> You only had one option to choose.
>
> If there is only one course of action available then there are no option
> - basic logic.
>
> However, since I don't answer to you or anybody here, I choose my own
> actions.

Don't you find it ridiculously amusing how these utter *morons* strut
around here as if they're in some mythical positions of "authority" and
demand that people comply with whatever instruction they deem fit to issue?

Talk about small dick syndrome. I'll bet they just *loved* being milk
monitors at school :)

>> "Whatever" was just your infantile attempt at avoidance.
>
> No, it was an expression of complete indifference to your obsessive
> point of view. So, just move on or suck it up.

You know that's not going to happen, right? If Jerky and his band of
merry fuckwits *didn't* carry on like they do around here they would
have absolutely no reason to be here as we all sure as shit know they
contribute *nothing* of value to this irrelevant little group in any
other way.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 30/09/2021 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>>>>> you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me)
>>>>>>>>>> also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly
>>>>>>>>>> even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't
>>>>>>>>>> require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any of his claims to
>>>>>>>>>> you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
>>>>>>> lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>
>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>
>> You only had one option to choose.
>
> If there is only one course of action available then there are no option
> - basic logic.
>

Basic logic says you're fucked.

We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)

On 1/10/21 9:04 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 30/09/2021 10:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>
>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>
>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>> option - basic logic.
>>
>> However, since I don't answer to you or anybody here, I choose my own
>> actions.
>
> Don't you find it ridiculously amusing how these utter *morons* strut
> around here as if they're in some mythical positions of "authority" and
> demand that people comply with whatever instruction they deem fit to issue?

Actually, I find it highly amusing how you strut around here all the
while creating a *mythology* around your capabilities. Such a shame it
all exists only in your mind.
>
> Talk about small dick syndrome. I'll bet they just *loved* being milk
> monitors at school :)

Sounds like you're echoing your own life *at school*, you know, the
place where your failures became self evident.
>
>>> "Whatever" was just your infantile attempt at avoidance.
>>
>> No, it was an expression of complete indifference to your obsessive
>> point of view. So, just move on or suck it up.
>
> You know that's not going to happen, right? If Jerky and his band of
> merry fuckwits *didn't* carry on like they do around here they would
> have absolutely no reason to be here as we all sure as shit know they
> contribute *nothing* of value to this irrelevant little group in any
> other way.

So, what's the reason you're here Darren? Nothing else worthwhile in
your life except for the fake persona you created in here?

--

Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 1/10/2021 7:43 am, Xeno wrote:
> On 1/10/21 9:04 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 10:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>
>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>
>>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>>> option - basic logic.
>>>
>>> However, since I don't answer to you or anybody here, I choose my own
>>> actions.
>>
>> Don't you find it ridiculously amusing how these utter *morons* strut
>> around here as if they're in some mythical positions of "authority"
>> and demand that people comply with whatever instruction they deem fit
>> to issue?
>
> Actually, I find it highly amusing how you strut around here all the
> while creating a *mythology* around your capabilities. Such a shame it
> all exists only in your mind.
>>
>> Talk about small dick syndrome. I'll bet they just *loved* being milk
>> monitors at school :)
>
> Sounds like you're echoing your own life *at school*, you know, the
> place where your failures became self evident.

He didn't go to school. He was the uneducable bogan sitting outside the
local deli with a packet of Winny Blues tucked into his shoulder.

On 1/10/2021 9:25 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 30/09/2021 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hoot!) has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'I *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Mind you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig
>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and
>>>>>>>>>>> me) also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and
>>>>>>>>>>> possibly even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now,
>>>>>>>>>>> but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any
>>>>>>>>>>> of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven
>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
>>>>>>>> lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>
>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>
>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>
>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>> option - basic logic.
>>
>
> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>
> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>
>

On 10/1/2021 10:32 AM, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 1/10/2021 9:25 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plonked sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hoot!) has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Der has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'I *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraud lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Mind you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and
>>>>>>>>>>>> me) also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any
>>>>>>>>>>>> of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven
>>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is
>>>>>>>>>> false, only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he
>>>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>
>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>
>>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>>> option - basic logic.
>>>
>>
>> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>>
>> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>>
>>
>
> hoisted by his own petard  :)

On 1/10/2021 10:32 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 1/10/2021 9:25 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hoot!) has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'I *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Mind you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and
>>>>>>>>>>>> me) also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any
>>>>>>>>>>>> of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven
>>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>>>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
>>>>>>>>> lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>
>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>
>>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>>> option - basic logic.
>>>
>>
>> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>>
>> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>>
>>
>
> hoisted by his own petard  :)
>
Little felix peeked from under the curtain and squeaked "Me too"

On 1/10/2021 9:43 am, Xeno wrote:
> On 1/10/21 9:04 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 10:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>
>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>
>>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>>> option - basic logic.
>>>
>>> However, since I don't answer to you or anybody here, I choose my own
>>> actions.
>>
>> Don't you find it ridiculously amusing how these utter *morons* strut
>> around here as if they're in some mythical positions of "authority"
>> and demand that people comply with whatever instruction they deem fit
>> to issue?
>
> Actually, I find it highly amusing how you strut around here all the
> while creating a *mythology* around your capabilities. Such a shame it
> all exists only in your mind.
>>
>> Talk about small dick syndrome. I'll bet they just *loved* being milk
>> monitors at school :)
>
> Sounds like you're echoing your own life *at school*, you know, the
> place where your failures became self evident.
>>
>>>> "Whatever" was just your infantile attempt at avoidance.
>>>
>>> No, it was an expression of complete indifference to your obsessive
>>> point of view. So, just move on or suck it up.
>>
>> You know that's not going to happen, right? If Jerky and his band of
>> merry fuckwits *didn't* carry on like they do around here they would
>> have absolutely no reason to be here as we all sure as shit know they
>> contribute *nothing* of value to this irrelevant little group in any
>> other way.
>
> So, what's the reason you're here Darren? Nothing else worthwhile in
> your life except for the fake persona you created in here?

Equally, what is the reason that you are here? Nothing else worthwhile
in your life except for wingeing about noddy?

On 1/10/2021 9:25 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 30/09/2021 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig
>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and
>>>>>>>>>>> me) also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and
>>>>>>>>>>> possibly even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now, but
>>>>>>>>>>> you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any of his
>>>>>>>>>>> claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
>>>>>>>> lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>
>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>
>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>
>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>> option - basic logic.
>>
>
> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>
> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>
>
I'd rather have a paradox than an obsession any day.

On 1/10/2021 11:22 am, jonz wrote:
> On 10/1/2021 10:32 AM, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 1/10/2021 9:25 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2021 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plonked sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand then either you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hoot!) has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Der has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'I *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraud lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Mind you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> me) also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven
>>>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is
>>>>>>>>>>> false, only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he
>>>>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which
>>>>>>>>> *no* evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>>
>>>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>>>> options - basic logic.

On 1/10/2021 11:58 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 1/10/2021 10:32 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 1/10/2021 9:25 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2021 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plonked sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand then either you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hoot!) has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Der has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'I *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraud lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Mind you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> me) also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven
>>>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is
>>>>>>>>>>> false, only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he
>>>>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which
>>>>>>>>> *no* evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>>
>>>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>>>> option - basic logic.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>>>
>>> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> hoisted by his own petard  :)
>>
> Little felix peeked from under the curtain and squeaked "Me too"

On 1/10/2021 12:01 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 1/10/2021 9:25 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2021 7:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all my posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plonked sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hoot!) has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once again that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Der has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'I *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraud lying his fool
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Mind you, that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very keen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge
>>>>>>>>>>>> them up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and
>>>>>>>>>>>> me) also I know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly even jonz could except he's a noddy devotee now,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to justify any
>>>>>>>>>>>> of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven
>>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is
>>>>>>>>>> false, only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he
>>>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>>>>>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>
>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>
>>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no
>>> option - basic logic.
>>>
>>
>> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>>
>> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>>
>>
> I'd rather have a paradox than an obsession any day.

On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:04:45 +1000, Noddy wrote:

> On 30/09/2021 10:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/09/2021 7:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>
>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>
>> If there is only one course of action available then there are no option
>> - basic logic.
>>
>> However, since I don't answer to you or anybody here, I choose my own
>> actions.
>
> Don't you find it ridiculously amusing how these utter *morons* strut
> around here as if they're in some mythical positions of "authority" and
> demand that people comply with whatever instruction they deem fit to issue?
>
> Talk about small dick syndrome. I'll bet they just *loved* being milk
> monitors at school :)
>
>>> "Whatever" was just your infantile attempt at avoidance.
>>
>> No, it was an expression of complete indifference to your obsessive
>> point of view. So, just move on or suck it up.
>
> You know that's not going to happen, right? If Jerky and his band of
> merry fuckwits *didn't* carry on like they do around here they would
> have absolutely no reason to be here as we all sure as shit know they
> contribute *nothing* of value to this irrelevant little group in any
> other way.

Tune in tomorrow for another disturbing episode of "Der Der's Alternate
Universe".

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus