In article <tp7dl6$pc9$1@pcls7.std.com>
Andrzej rapes kiddies <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> In article <nkcerhtsn4eimmn4sbrvpp5dlnojfrff22@4ax.com>,
> sick old nazoid paedo Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron ("KKKernal Corn") wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Please stay away from HUMAN forums, you shiteating, pissdrinking, donkeydicksucking,
> grannyfucking, jizzlicking, motherless pile of sub-excrement nazoid PAEDO filth who
> takes dozens of muzzie dicks up his arse and throat on an hourly basis.
>
> Thank you!

+1

R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> wrote

> Oil is stored solar power. It takes 100 mn years to make and you
> can discharge it just one time.

> It turns the earth back to what it was
> before dinosaurs were a thing

Bullshit.

> and is one of if not the biggest cause
> of cancer in developed countries, let alone the rest of the world.

More bullshit.

> Due to the incredibly poor efficiency of ICE you only get ~30% of the
> energy out that is actually in there.

> If you dont tune the motor every
> week that can drop to 20%.

More bullshit with current ICE cars which tune themselves continuously.

> For 150 years fossil companies have essentially been charging you triple
> for each gallon of gas an nitwits have been happy to pay through the
> nose for it.

More bullshit, in fact most didn't pay thru the nose at all.

> Electric motors there days run over 90% and up to 99% and the energy you
> can harvest to run them is essentially free

Pity about the cost of the hardware needed to 'harvest'
it and pity about the fact that its available for 'harvesting'
for only about 39% of the day when most of us are at work.

<reams of your even sillier pig ignorant shit flushed where it belongs>

R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> wrote
>>>>> Even Exxon calculated back in the 1980s that doubling the CO2 in

>>>>> the atm above what it used to be in the early 19th cent would lead to
>>>>> around 3C of warming. I.e. .01C per 1ppmv of CO2 added.

>>>> And in fact we might have seen 1C at most.

>>> Exxon confirmed they expected a CO2 doubling to produce 3C of warming.

>> And in fact we might have seen 1C at most.

> And in fact we've seen it was warmer even in the middle of a triple La
> Nina.

BULLSHIT. I only had the cooler on for a couple of days last summer
and only turned it on for the first time this summer on Xmas day for
a couple of days and its been off every day since then.

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 08:49:25 +1100, Trevor Wilson
<trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

>On 6/01/2023 6:38 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 05:54:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>
Trevor tells us we are all wrong, even claiming he knows more than
Scientists that state Climate change is based more on fiction than
fact, he gets his info from the media chicken feed he reads and
mindlessly believes this money making scam .
These media propagandists have a blacklist of knowledgeable people and
scientists
<https://saltbushclub.com/2019/08/18/black-list-of-climate-sceptics/>
He even states he knows more than all of them!

The so called green media promoted movement are out to destroy the
planet with their not well thought about plans.
https://tinyurl.com/2palpy4w
6 times more mining to produce an electric vehicle comparable to
combustion engine vehicle. Also might I add electric vehicles have a
lifespan. There are vintage combustion engine vehicles still on the
road today.
--
Petzl
The Greens have never done anything worthwhile to this country.
All they are known for is being an arm of the ALP and handing them and
vice versa, preferences at election time.

Labor the best party that Chinese money can buy!

On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 7:12:24 PM UTC+11, Daniel65 wrote:
> petzl wrote on 5/1/23 7:36 am:
> > On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 8:55:12 PM UTC+11, Daniel65 wrote:
> >> Petzl wrote on 3/1/23 8:02 pm:
> >>>
> >>> The FBI has just confirmed that it has paid MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
> >>> to
> >>
> >> Oh!! Have you got a (reputable) link for that, thanks??
> >>
> > You just like and take in media Chook food. Search results, doubt if
> > "ministry of truth" would allow your "media" to tell you
> > https://tinyurl.com/2h5vn8dl
> Hmm!! That obfuscated link takes people to a DuckDuckGo listing of
> various websites, Petzl. Why you would want to obfuscate a DDG link is
> beyond me .... but anyway ....
>
> The first link listed takes me to
>
> https://reason.com/2022/12/19/the-fbi-paid-twitter-3-4-million-for-processing-requests/
>
> reason.com .... don't know that I've ever heard of that let alone as a
> "(reputable) link" .... but whatever!!
>
> Thanks for trying, Petzl.
> >>> Twitter, and also that large amounts of money has been paid by
> >>> them to other Social Media Companies, which has all, when put
> >>> together, shown massive campaign fraud in the 2020 Election. The
> >>> FBI said they were working with private companies, but what they
> >>> didn’t say was that it was for the purpose of changing the
> >>> Election results, pushing Biden over “Trump.” Wow!
>
Easy to look but you conveniently too stupid to work out a search engine?

Try
https://tinyurl.com/2n5zmoga
--
Petzl
“Think before you speak”
“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”
“Everything you say should be true,
but not everything true should be said.”
Proving that there’s nothing really new under the sun,
Socrates’s Three Sieves?
A sieve is an old-fashioned word for a filter,
or you might think of a modern kitchen strainer as a good simile.

On 6/01/2023 12:11 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 08:23:17 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 5/01/2023 7:53 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 07:20:20 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/01/2023 11:20 pm, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:00:26 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/01/2023 4:29 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>>>>>>>>>> Joe wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  <reams of your shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed
>>>>>>>>> where it belongs>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ice core data tells us that sometimes, temperature rise precedes CO2
>>>>>>>>>> rise and sometimes it lags.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Because they aren't as correlated as you have previously stupidly
>>>>>>>>> claimed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bullshit. They are closely linked. When one goes up, the other follows.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pathetic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **"Pathetic"? It's a fact you boob.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> RIGHT NOW, we are experiencing a period where CO2 rise is leading
>>>>>>>>>> temperature rise. I expect that may change when CO2 levels reach
>>>>>>>>>> approximately 500ppm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  And you will discover that it doesn't when that happens.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <reams of your endlessly repeated shit flushed where it belongs>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At that point, we will see an increase in CO2 levels (and methane
>>>>>>>>>> levels), as the gases are released from oceans and Arctic regions.
>>>>>>>>>> Then, of course, temperature levels will increase further. Then
>>>>>>>>>> CO2/methane levels and process repeats.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  We'll see, and even it it does, that will not see a climate
>>>>>>>>> catastrophe as you have previously stupidly claimed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> YOU made that stupid claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **Actually, I did not. I merely repeated what the climate scientists
>>>>>> have told us.
>>>>>
>>>>> By repeating it, the anus[sic] is on you to prove it.
>>>>
>>>> **No, it isn't. I have provided links to the best science available. If
>>>> YOU dispute that science, then it is up to YOU to submit your refutation
>>>> of that science.
>>>>
>>>> So, over to you: Provide your page by page refutation of the science:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
>>>>
>>>> The report is extensive and I expect that it will take you quite some
>>>> time to read, understand and then submit your refutation of the science.
>>>>
>>>> Over to you.
>>>
>>> *You* call it the 'best science available', I don't. *I* call it yet
>>> more UN bullshit. Back over to you.
>>
>> **Good. You have called it bullshit. I assume you've read all the IPCC
>> reports and understood them. Submit your page by page refutation of the
>> IPCC reports. Or shut the fuck up.
>
> Listen here, convict spawn:

Yep. Having had British convicts shipped to our shores is a history we
share with the US which also had convicts shipped to the shores of it's
colonies.

It's amazing how many Americans are ignorant of their nation's convict
history. They parade their ignorance when they try to insult
Australians about our convict past.

On 6/01/2023 12:17 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:52:37 +1100, Fran
> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/01/2023 11:16 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:22:06 +1100, Fran
>>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/01/2023 11:20 pm, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:00:26 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> www.ipcc.ch
>>>>>
>>>>> UN? You cannot be serious!
>>>>
>>>> Trevor please stop arguing with this moron as all his responses (and
>>>> especially this one) reveal that that he's just another ill-educated,
>>>> parochial, ignorant boob.
>>>
>>> Is that the best you can do, you obsequious asslicking piece of shite?
>>
>> More proof of your lack of education and your ignorance. Learn to read.
>> Or ask someone to explain arse licking.
>
> No need. Do you even know what 'obsequious' MEANS?

Of course. Clearly you don't. Learn to read as currently you aren't
competent.
>
>> I didn't do any arse licking. I did describe you.
>
> You have been licking Twevor's ass wholesale. It describes YOU,
> shithead.

That's your fantasy.

You clearly don't read well enough to understand that my words described
you. I never implied that Trevor's arse has been, or needs, licking.
Effectively I told you that you are a know nothing, uneducated and
narrow minded fuckwit and I asked Trevor to stop playing with you.
But I'm sure you still won't get that message despite my repeating it.

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 08:49:25 +1100, Trevor Wilson
<trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

>On 6/01/2023 6:38 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 05:54:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

<b'rissed>

>>>>>>> So, over to you: Provide your page by page refutation of the science:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The report is extensive and I expect that it will take you quite some
>>>>>>> time to read, understand and then submit your refutation of the science.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over to you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *You* call it the 'best science available', I don't. *I* call it yet
>>>>>> more UN bullshit. Back over to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> **Good. You have called it bullshit. I assume you've read all the IPCC
>>>>> reports and understood them. Submit your page by page refutation of the
>>>>> IPCC reports. Or shut the fuck up.
>>>>
>>>> Listen here, convict spawn: if it has been excreted by the UN then
>>>> it's bullshit by definition. Nothing of value EVER gets excreted by
>>>> the Turd World dominated UN.
>>>
>>> **Prove it.
>>
>> It's the fucking UN...as useless an inter-governmental body as there
>> ever was.
>
>**Prove that the IPCC reports are in error. You can insult and demean
>the UN all you wish, but you need to provide some proof that the IPCC
>reports are wrong.
>
>Over to you dickhead: PROVE IT. Prove that the IPCC reports are wrong.

No, over to YOU, shithead. Prove they're worth any more than any
other UN excrement.

> What's there to prove?
>
>
>**Prove that the IPCC reports are wrong.
>
> Find ONE thing of value the UN has
>> ever produced.
>
>**The IPCC reports.

LOL. Horse manure like the rest of their output.

>>
>>>>>>>>>> YOU get to do the proving.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> THATS how it works.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **How it works is that YOU need to learn some basic science, before
>>>>>>>>> making an (bigger) idiot of yourself. Start here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> www.ipcc.ch
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> UN? You cannot be serious!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **As I stated before: YOU need to submit your refutation of the science.
>>>>>>> Don't forget: Like any scientific paper, I expect that you will submit
>>>>>>> yours for peer review.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, I will make it VERY easy for you, because I realise that the
>>>>>>> chances of you refuting the IPCC reports is an impossibility. You lack
>>>>>>> the resources, the will and the intellect to do so. All you need to do
>>>>>>> is prove that Svante Arrhenius, who formulated AGW theory way back in
>>>>>>> 1899, got it wrong. It has been estimated that Arrhenius performed as
>>>>>>> many as 100,000 hand calculations to formulate his theory. You could
>>>>>>> arrange for those same calculations to be performed on a cheap computer
>>>>>>> in a second of two today. So, easy for you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove that Svante Arrhenius was wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW: Many have tried and none have succeeded. Nonetheless, you might
>>>>>>> succeed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove Arrhenius wrong or shut the fuck up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prove that he was correct or YOU shut the fuck up, dickhead. Once
>>>>>> more, the anus[sic] is on you.
>>>>>
>>>>> **Arrhenius has been shown to be correct. _I_ don't need to prove. YOU
>>>>> claim that Arrhenius was wrong. Prove it or shut the fuck up.
>>>>
>>>> I have not claimed that he was wrong,
>>>
>>> **Yes, you have. Many times.
>>
>> Where? Be specific now, convict spawn!
>
>**Prove that Arrhenius was wrong.,

WHERE have I claimed he was wrong, convict spawn?

>>> I just want *you* to prove he
>>>> was correct.
>>>
>>> **I don't need to. Arrhenius proved his theory correct. Not once in the
>>> past 120 years has anyone proven him to be incorrect.
>>
>> So you claim. Now prove it.
>
>**Asked and answered. Arrhenius has already supplied the proof.

Prove it.

>>> Do it or YOU shut the fuck up, convict spawn.
>>>
>>> **I note that you have failed to prove Arrhenius wrong. I note that you
>>> have failed to prove the IPCC reports wrong.
>>
>> I note that you have failed to prove Arrhenius correct.
>
>**Arrhenius proved his own theory. Not once in the past 120+ years has
>Arrhenius been shown to be wrong.

Prove it.

> I note that
>> you have failed to prove the IPCC UN shitheads correct.
>
>**Since you have failed to read the IPCC reports and have failed to show
>where the IPCC got it wrong, it is you who has failed.

Wrong. All you do is repeat the same shite over and over without a
shred of proof.

>>
>> Now what about these ICE AGES going back 2.4 BILLION years I mentioned
>> elsewhere? No comment, shithead?
>
>**What about them?

YOU claim Ice Ages have only been going on for 1 million years. THAT'S
what's about them.

>Now, either prove Arrhenius wrong, or admit he was right.
>Prove the IPCC was wrong, or admit that the IPCC is right.

Prove that Ice Ages have only been happening for the past 1 million
years. I've NAMED the ones going back 2.4 BILLION years.

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 09:55:02 +1100, Fran
<gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
wrote:

>On 6/01/2023 12:11 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 08:23:17 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/01/2023 7:53 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 07:20:20 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/01/2023 11:20 pm, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:00:26 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/01/2023 4:29 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> Joe wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  <reams of your shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed
>>>>>>>>>> where it belongs>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ice core data tells us that sometimes, temperature rise precedes CO2
>>>>>>>>>>> rise and sometimes it lags.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Because they aren't as correlated as you have previously stupidly
>>>>>>>>>> claimed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. They are closely linked. When one goes up, the other follows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pathetic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **"Pathetic"? It's a fact you boob.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> RIGHT NOW, we are experiencing a period where CO2 rise is leading
>>>>>>>>>>> temperature rise. I expect that may change when CO2 levels reach
>>>>>>>>>>> approximately 500ppm.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  And you will discover that it doesn't when that happens.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <reams of your endlessly repeated shit flushed where it belongs>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> At that point, we will see an increase in CO2 levels (and methane
>>>>>>>>>>> levels), as the gases are released from oceans and Arctic regions.
>>>>>>>>>>> Then, of course, temperature levels will increase further. Then
>>>>>>>>>>> CO2/methane levels and process repeats.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  We'll see, and even it it does, that will not see a climate
>>>>>>>>>> catastrophe as you have previously stupidly claimed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> YOU made that stupid claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Actually, I did not. I merely repeated what the climate scientists
>>>>>>> have told us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By repeating it, the anus[sic] is on you to prove it.
>>>>>
>>>>> **No, it isn't. I have provided links to the best science available. If
>>>>> YOU dispute that science, then it is up to YOU to submit your refutation
>>>>> of that science.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, over to you: Provide your page by page refutation of the science:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
>>>>>
>>>>> The report is extensive and I expect that it will take you quite some
>>>>> time to read, understand and then submit your refutation of the science.
>>>>>
>>>>> Over to you.
>>>>
>>>> *You* call it the 'best science available', I don't. *I* call it yet
>>>> more UN bullshit. Back over to you.
>>>
>>> **Good. You have called it bullshit. I assume you've read all the IPCC
>>> reports and understood them. Submit your page by page refutation of the
>>> IPCC reports. Or shut the fuck up.
>>
>> Listen here, convict spawn:
>
>Yep. Having had British convicts shipped to our shores is a history we
>share with the US which also had convicts shipped to the shores of it's[sic]
>colonies.

Nothing on the scale of Oztralia's transportations. And illiteracy
noted.

Oztralian immigration officer to new arrival: Do you have a criminal
record?
New arrival: I didn't know that was still a requirement.

>It's amazing how many Americans are ignorant of their nation's convict
>history. They parade their ignorance when they try to insult
>Australians about our convict past.

STFU, convict spawn. I see that you haven't added a single comment
relevant to climate change or Ice Ages.

On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:15:53 +0000, KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com>
wrote:

<b'rissed>

WHY is Twevor Wilson ignoring this FACT?

"The five major ice ages in the paleo record include the Huronian
glaciation (2.4 billion to 2.1 billion years ago), the Cryogenian
glaciation (720 million to 635 million years ago), the Andean-Saharan
glaciation (450 million to 420 million years ago), the Late Paleozoic
ice age (335 million to 260 million years ago) and the Quaternary
glaciation (2.7 million years ago to present)."

The polar ice caps are proof that we are still in a mega Ice Age.

On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 20:58:14 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN spamming as Andrzej rapes kiddies <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> wrote:

<jew shite b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

On 12/24/22 08:39, Petzl wrote:

Tiberius Caesar who reigned for 22 years,
and his last year was AD 37. wrote:
"The extremities of Spain, the various parts of Gaul, the regions of
Britain which have never been penetrated by Roman arms, have received
the religion of Christ."

No - that cant be true. That is only 5 or 10 years after the death of
Christ. It spread fast, but cant have spread that fast.

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:07:16 +1100, Fran
<gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
wrote:

>On 6/01/2023 12:17 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:52:37 +1100, Fran
>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/01/2023 11:16 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:22:06 +1100, Fran
>>>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/01/2023 11:20 pm, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:00:26 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> www.ipcc.ch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> UN? You cannot be serious!
>>>>>
>>>>> Trevor please stop arguing with this moron as all his responses (and
>>>>> especially this one) reveal that that he's just another ill-educated,
>>>>> parochial, ignorant boob.
>>>>
>>>> Is that the best you can do, you obsequious asslicking piece of shite?
>>>
>>> More proof of your lack of education and your ignorance. Learn to read.
>>> Or ask someone to explain arse licking.
>>
>> No need. Do you even know what 'obsequious' MEANS?
>
>Of course. Clearly you don't. Learn to read as currently you aren't
>competent.

Pathetic. What are you, 5 years old?

>>> I didn't do any arse licking. I did describe you.
>>
>> You have been licking Twevor's ass wholesale. It describes YOU,
>> shithead.
>
>That's your fantasy.

It's your daily obligation.

>You clearly don't read well enough to understand that my words described
>you. I never implied that Trevor's arse has been, or needs, licking.
>Effectively I told you that you are a know nothing, uneducated and
>narrow minded fuckwit and I asked Trevor to stop playing with you.
>But I'm sure you still won't get that message despite my repeating it.

Are you going to make ANY contribution to the topic of this thread or
are you simply going to keep brown-nosing Twevor?

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 11:02:14 +1100, abc <automatic440@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/24/22 08:39, Petzl wrote:
>
>
>Tiberius Caesar who reigned for 22 years,
>and his last year was AD 37. wrote:
>"The extremities of Spain, the various parts of Gaul, the regions of
>Britain which have never been penetrated by Roman arms, have received
>the religion of Christ."
>
>
>No - that cant be true. That is only 5 or 10 years after the death of
>Christ. It spread fast, but cant have spread that fast.
>
The Vatican first believed the scroll real, but could not verify it
was 100% genuine, but probably is.
The same for the Shroud of Christ
--
Petzl
Think of Christianity as Australia's immune system.
The Christian belief and fact is Moslems are deceived.
Like Schizophrenics, they need therapy;
Not confirmation of their delusions.
The recognized place of worship in a Christian Nation is a Christian Church.
Mosques are the recognized place of worship only in Moslem countries
Australia's only legally defined God is our Christian God whose compound redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ
Something as simple as denying Moslems a place to pray is all it takes to make them leave voluntarily and peacefully.

On Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:13:05 +0000, KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com>
wrote:

>On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:07:16 +1100, Fran
><gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On 6/01/2023 12:17 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:52:37 +1100, Fran
>>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/01/2023 11:16 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:22:06 +1100, Fran
>>>>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>>>>> wrote:

>>> No need. Do you even know what 'obsequious' MEANS?
>>
>>Of course. Clearly you don't. Learn to read as currently you aren't
>>competent.
>
>Pathetic. What are you, 5 years old?
>
>>>> I didn't do any arse licking. I did describe you.
>>>
>>> You have been licking Twevor's ass wholesale. It describes YOU,
>>> shithead.
>>
>>That's your fantasy.
>
>It's your daily obligation.
>
>>You clearly don't read well enough to understand that my words described
>>you. I never implied that Trevor's arse has been, or needs, licking.
>>Effectively I told you that you are a know nothing, uneducated and
>>narrow minded fuckwit and I asked Trevor to stop playing with you.
>>But I'm sure you still won't get that message despite my repeating it.
>
>Are you going to make ANY contribution to the topic of this thread or
>are you simply going to keep brown-nosing Twevor?
>
"Fran" never does she is obsequious only to the far lefty loons.
You will now be plonked she does this to all those intelligent
--
Petzl
Stop the fool's paradise of the so-called transition to a clean energy
economy and put the yearly $3.1b wasted into the pockets of Families
who desperately need it.

On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 23:23:02 +0000, KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:15:53 +0000, KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com>
>wrote:
>
><b'rissed>
>
>WHY is Twevor Wilson ignoring this FACT?
>
>"The five major ice ages in the paleo record include the Huronian
>glaciation (2.4 billion to 2.1 billion years ago), the Cryogenian
>glaciation (720 million to 635 million years ago), the Andean-Saharan
>glaciation (450 million to 420 million years ago), the Late Paleozoic
>ice age (335 million to 260 million years ago) and the Quaternary
>glaciation (2.7 million years ago to present)."
>
>The polar ice caps are proof that we are still in a mega Ice Age.

Sydney is now in the third moth of summer and it is and has been COLD!
--
Petzl
Stop the fool's paradise of the so-called transition to a clean energy
economy and put the yearly $3.1b into the pockets of families who
desperately need it.

https://www.ozanimals.com/wildlife/Bird/Owls.html

Friday, 6th January 2023, 00:57 UTC, X1.22

Duration: 8224320 seconds, 137072 minutes

( 8224320 - 0234228 ) / 9 = 887788

On 6/01/2023 9:38 am, Petzl wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 08:49:25 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 6/01/2023 6:38 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 05:54:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
> Trevor tells us we are all wrong,

**No. It's the SCIENCE that tells you that you are wrong you moron.

even claiming he knows more than
> Scientists that state Climate change is based more on fiction than
> fact,

**Not at all. I cite the climate scientists.

he gets his info from the media chicken feed he reads and
> mindlessly believes this money making scam .

**Nope. I read PEER-REVIEWED science.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

On 6/01/2023 10:15 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 08:49:25 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 6/01/2023 6:38 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 05:54:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
> <b'rissed>
>
>>>>>>>> So, over to you: Provide your page by page refutation of the science:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The report is extensive and I expect that it will take you quite some
>>>>>>>> time to read, understand and then submit your refutation of the science.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Over to you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *You* call it the 'best science available', I don't. *I* call it yet
>>>>>>> more UN bullshit. Back over to you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **Good. You have called it bullshit. I assume you've read all the IPCC
>>>>>> reports and understood them. Submit your page by page refutation of the
>>>>>> IPCC reports. Or shut the fuck up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Listen here, convict spawn: if it has been excreted by the UN then
>>>>> it's bullshit by definition. Nothing of value EVER gets excreted by
>>>>> the Turd World dominated UN.
>>>>
>>>> **Prove it.
>>>
>>> It's the fucking UN...as useless an inter-governmental body as there
>>> ever was.
>>
>> **Prove that the IPCC reports are in error. You can insult and demean
>> the UN all you wish, but you need to provide some proof that the IPCC
>> reports are wrong.
>>
>> Over to you dickhead: PROVE IT. Prove that the IPCC reports are wrong.
>
> No, over to YOU, shithead. Prove they're worth any more than any
> other UN excrement.

**YOU are the one claiming that all the peer-reviewed science in the
IPCC reports is wrong, yet you offer ZERO proof of your claim.

>
>> What's there to prove?
>>
>>
>> **Prove that the IPCC reports are wrong.
>>
>> Find ONE thing of value the UN has
>>> ever produced.
>>
>> **The IPCC reports.
>
> LOL. Horse manure like the rest of their output.

**The prove it you idiot.

>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> YOU get to do the proving.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> THATS how it works.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> **How it works is that YOU need to learn some basic science, before
>>>>>>>>>> making an (bigger) idiot of yourself. Start here:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> www.ipcc.ch
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> UN? You cannot be serious!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **As I stated before: YOU need to submit your refutation of the science.
>>>>>>>> Don't forget: Like any scientific paper, I expect that you will submit
>>>>>>>> yours for peer review.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However, I will make it VERY easy for you, because I realise that the
>>>>>>>> chances of you refuting the IPCC reports is an impossibility. You lack
>>>>>>>> the resources, the will and the intellect to do so. All you need to do
>>>>>>>> is prove that Svante Arrhenius, who formulated AGW theory way back in
>>>>>>>> 1899, got it wrong. It has been estimated that Arrhenius performed as
>>>>>>>> many as 100,000 hand calculations to formulate his theory. You could
>>>>>>>> arrange for those same calculations to be performed on a cheap computer
>>>>>>>> in a second of two today. So, easy for you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prove that Svante Arrhenius was wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW: Many have tried and none have succeeded. Nonetheless, you might
>>>>>>>> succeed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prove Arrhenius wrong or shut the fuck up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove that he was correct or YOU shut the fuck up, dickhead. Once
>>>>>>> more, the anus[sic] is on you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **Arrhenius has been shown to be correct. _I_ don't need to prove. YOU
>>>>>> claim that Arrhenius was wrong. Prove it or shut the fuck up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have not claimed that he was wrong,
>>>>
>>>> **Yes, you have. Many times.
>>>
>>> Where? Be specific now, convict spawn!
>>
>> **Prove that Arrhenius was wrong.,
>
> WHERE have I claimed he was wrong, convict spawn?
>
>>>> I just want *you* to prove he
>>>>> was correct.
>>>>
>>>> **I don't need to. Arrhenius proved his theory correct. Not once in the
>>>> past 120 years has anyone proven him to be incorrect.
>>>
>>> So you claim. Now prove it.
>>
>> **Asked and answered. Arrhenius has already supplied the proof.
>
> Prove it.

**Arrhenius has already proven his claim.

>
>>>> Do it or YOU shut the fuck up, convict spawn.
>>>>
>>>> **I note that you have failed to prove Arrhenius wrong. I note that you
>>>> have failed to prove the IPCC reports wrong.
>>>
>>> I note that you have failed to prove Arrhenius correct.
>>
>> **Arrhenius proved his own theory. Not once in the past 120+ years has
>> Arrhenius been shown to be wrong.
>
> Prove it.

**And again: Arrhenius proved his claim. YOU have failed to disprove
Arrhenius' theory.

Which, of course, means you are full of shit.

>
>> I note that
>>> you have failed to prove the IPCC UN shitheads correct.
>>
>> **Since you have failed to read the IPCC reports and have failed to show
>> where the IPCC got it wrong, it is you who has failed.
>
> Wrong. All you do is repeat the same shite over and over without a
> shred of proof.
>
>>>
>>> Now what about these ICE AGES going back 2.4 BILLION years I mentioned
>>> elsewhere? No comment, shithead?
>>
>> **What about them?
>
> YOU claim Ice Ages have only been going on for 1 million years. THAT'S
> what's about them.

**Did I make that claim? Cite.

>
>> Now, either prove Arrhenius wrong, or admit he was right.
>> Prove the IPCC was wrong, or admit that the IPCC is right.
>
> Prove that Ice Ages have only been happening for the past 1 million
> years. I've NAMED the ones going back 2.4 BILLION years.

**YOU need to prove that the IPCC data is wrong and that Arrhenius was
wrong.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

Petzl wrote on 6/1/23 11:29 am:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 11:02:14 +1100, abc <automatic440@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12/24/22 08:39, Petzl wrote:
>>
>> Tiberius Caesar who reigned for 22 years,
>> and his last year was AD 37. wrote:
>> "The extremities of Spain, the various parts of Gaul, the regions of
>> Britain which have never been penetrated by Roman arms, have received
>> the religion of Christ."
>>
>> No - that cant be true. That is only 5 or 10 years after the death of
>> Christ. It spread fast, but cant have spread that fast.
>>
> The Vatican first believed the scroll real, but could not verify it
> was 100% genuine, but probably is.
> The same for the Shroud of Christ
>
What "scroll", Petzl!!
--
Daniel

petzl wrote on 6/1/23 9:53 am:
> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 7:12:24 PM UTC+11, Daniel65 wrote:
>> petzl wrote on 5/1/23 7:36 am:
>>> On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 8:55:12 PM UTC+11, Daniel65
>>> wrote:
>>>> Petzl wrote on 3/1/23 8:02 pm:
>>>>>
>>>>> The FBI has just confirmed that it has paid MILLIONS OF
>>>>> DOLLARS to
>>>>
>>>> Oh!! Have you got a (reputable) link for that, thanks??
>>>>
>>> You just like and take in media Chook food. Search results, doubt
>>> if "ministry of truth" would allow your "media" to tell you
>>> https://tinyurl.com/2h5vn8dl
>> Hmm!! That obfuscated link takes people to a DuckDuckGo listing of
>> various websites, Petzl. Why you would want to obfuscate a DDG link
>> is beyond me .... but anyway ....
>>
>> The first link listed takes me to
>>
>> https://reason.com/2022/12/19/the-fbi-paid-twitter-3-4-million-for-processing-requests/
>>
>> reason.com .... don't know that I've ever heard of that let alone as
>> a "(reputable) link" .... but whatever!!
>>
>> Thanks for trying, Petzl.
>>>>> Twitter, and also that large amounts of money has been paid
>>>>> by them to other Social Media Companies, which has all, when
>>>>> put together, shown massive campaign fraud in the 2020
>>>>> Election. The FBI said they were working with private
>>>>> companies, but what they didn’t say was that it was for the
>>>>> purpose of changing the Election results, pushing Biden over
>>>>> “Trump.” Wow!
>>
> Easy to look but you conveniently too stupid to work out a search
> engine?

Are you looking in the mirror again, Petzl??

> Try https://tinyurl.com/2n5zmoga
>
Obfuscated link, again!! Nope!!
--
Daniel

Rod Speed wrote on 6/1/23 9:19 am:
> R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> wrote
>>>>>> Even Exxon calculated back in the 1980s that doubling the
>>>>>> CO2 in the atm above what it used to be in the early 19th
>>>>>> cent would lead to around 3C of warming. I.e. .01C per
>>>>>> 1ppmv of CO2 added.
>
>>>>> And in fact we might have seen 1C at most.
>
>>>> Exxon confirmed they expected a CO2 doubling to produce 3C of
>>>> warming.
>
>>> And in fact we might have seen 1C at most.
>
>> And in fact we've seen it was warmer even in the middle of a
>> triple La Nina.
>
> BULLSHIT. I only had the cooler on for a couple of days last summer
> and only turned it on for the first time this summer on Xmas day for
> a couple of days and its been off every day since then.

I don't even think I've switched mine over from "Heat"!!
--
Daniel

KKKernal Corn wrote on 6/1/23 12:11 am:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 08:23:17 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

<Snip>

>> **Good. You have called it bullshit. I assume you've read all the
>> IPCC reports and understood them. Submit your page by page
>> refutation of the IPCC reports. Or shut the fuck up.
>
> Listen here, convict spawn: if it has been excreted by the UN then
> it's bullshit by definition. Nothing of value EVER gets excreted by
> the Turd World dominated UN.
"Turd World dominated UN"?? Yes, you're correct, it is dominated by the
U.S. of A.!! ;-P
--
Daniel

Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:tp8nrl$34eie$1@dont-
email.me:

> KKKernal Corn wrote on 6/1/23 12:11 am:
>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 08:23:17 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
>>> **Good. You have called it bullshit. I assume you've read all the
>>> IPCC reports and understood them. Submit your page by page
>>> refutation of the IPCC reports. Or shut the fuck up.
>>
>> Listen here, convict spawn: if it has been excreted by the UN then
>> it's bullshit by definition. Nothing of value EVER gets excreted by
>> the Turd World dominated UN.
> "Turd World dominated UN"?? Yes, you're correct, it is dominated by the
> U.S. of A.!! ;-P

Portugal