In article <94qrrhhmfsfbku3oae8eltg6ph3qpoluav@4ax.com>,
sick old nazoid paedo Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron ("KKKernal Corn") wrote:

> Actually, the beneficiary of your anilingus

PLEASE stop using foul language in this forum, you shiteating,
pissdrinking, donkeydicksucking, grannyfucking, jizzlicking,
motherless pile of sub-excrement nazoid PAEDO filth who takes
dozens of muzzie dicks up his arse and throat on an hourly basis.

> For the record, the current Quaternary Period (mentioned in the
> glossary) started 2.7 million years ago and is the FIFTH of the major
> Ice Ages. Look it up, you silly little cunt.

AND, you inferior cockroach?

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:58:35 +1100, Trevor Wilson
<trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

> On 11/01/2023 8:35 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:58:22 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/01/2023 11:59 pm, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 09:03:02 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/01/2023 10:23 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:15:53 +0000, KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <b'rissed>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WHY is Twevor Wilson ignoring this FACT?
>>>>>
>>>>> **I ignore nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am, however, STILL waiting for you to provide your proof that:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Arrhenius was wrong.
>>>>> * The IPCC reports are wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have failed miserably in supporting your claims.
>>>>
>>>> You haven't even read the IPCC reports. If you had, you wouldn't have
>>>> claimed that Ice Ages only covered the last million years.
>>>
>>> **Did I make such a claim?
>>>
>>> Cite.
>> I already did that <sigh>. Here it is again:
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>> Message-Id: <k1gte6FnsslU1@mid.individual.net>
>> **Points:
>> * We don't know if glaciations are cyclical or not.
>> * The regularity of glaciations is highly variable (+/- 50kyr).
>> * The history of this planet stretches to around 4.5 billion years.
>> The history of glacial periods is less than 1 million years.
>> * We need a great deal more information to determine if there is a
>> cyclical nature to glaciations.
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>> You see where it says 1 million years? Explain your way out of that,
>> shithead.
>
> **Read what I wrote. CAREFULLY.
>
>>
>>>>>> "The five major ice ages in the paleo record include the Huronian
>>>>>> glaciation (2.4 billion to 2.1 billion years ago), the Cryogenian
>>>>>> glaciation (720 million to 635 million years ago), the
>>>>>> Andean-Saharan
>>>>>> glaciation (450 million to 420 million years ago), the Late
>>>>>> Paleozoic
>>>>>> ice age (335 million to 260 million years ago) and the Quaternary
>>>>>> glaciation (2.7 million years ago to present)."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The polar ice caps are proof that we are still in a mega Ice Age.
>>>>>
>>>>> **Ummm, nope. We are in a cool period, but the planet is warming
>>>>> rapidly. As Arrhenius predicted and as the IPCC has reported.
>>>>
>>>> Idiot. Every mega Ice Age had a warming period as it waned.
>>>
>>> **Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is
>>> warming.
>> Every mega ICE AGE has a cooling period followed by a warming period.
>> We are LEAVING the current mega ice age. The real question is how soon
>> we will have a mini ice age similar to those in the Middle Ages when
>> the Thames would regularly freeze over.
>
> **Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is warming.
>
> I don't want a history lesson. I want to hear your scientific
> explanation of how it can occur.

Don't need on given that it clearly did happen, repeatedly.

Learn to read, "KKKernal Corn"!

"The amount of anthropogenic greenhouse gases emitted into Earth's
oceans and atmosphere is predicted to prevent the next glacial period
for the next 500,000 years, which otherwise would begin in around
50,000 years, and likely more glacial cycles after."

On 11/01/2023 9:36 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:02:43 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2023 8:28 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:56:13 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/01/2023 12:01 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 19:24:38 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/01/2023 10:15 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 08:49:25 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/01/2023 6:38 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 05:54:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <b'rissed>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, over to you: Provide your page by page refutation of the science:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The report is extensive and I expect that it will take you quite some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time to read, understand and then submit your refutation of the science.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Over to you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *You* call it the 'best science available', I don't. *I* call it yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more UN bullshit. Back over to you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> **Good. You have called it bullshit. I assume you've read all the IPCC
>>>>>>>>>>>> reports and understood them. Submit your page by page refutation of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> IPCC reports. Or shut the fuck up.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Listen here, convict spawn: if it has been excreted by the UN then
>>>>>>>>>>> it's bullshit by definition. Nothing of value EVER gets excreted by
>>>>>>>>>>> the Turd World dominated UN.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> **Prove it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's the fucking UN...as useless an inter-governmental body as there
>>>>>>>>> ever was.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **Prove that the IPCC reports are in error. You can insult and demean
>>>>>>>> the UN all you wish, but you need to provide some proof that the IPCC
>>>>>>>> reports are wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Over to you dickhead: PROVE IT. Prove that the IPCC reports are wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, over to YOU, shithead. Prove they're worth any more than any
>>>>>>> other UN excrement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **YOU are the one claiming that all the peer-reviewed science in the
>>>>>> IPCC reports is wrong, yet you offer ZERO proof of your claim.
>>>>>
>>>>> You haven't even READ the IPCC reports. That much is obvious.
>>>>
>>>> **I have read MUCH of the IPCC reports. I have not read ALL the reports
>>>> in their entirety.
>>>>
>>>> YOU, OTOH, have read not one word of the IPCC reports.
>>>
>>> You should have started with the GLOSSARY, you silly convict spawn.
>>> That might have told you something about ICE AGES.
>>
>> **I suggest you read the IPCC reports, before you condemn them.
>
> I suggest you start with the GLOSSARY before attempting to read them.

**You have condemned the IPCC reports, yet you have failed to read them.

Why?

>
>>>>>>>> What's there to prove?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **Prove that the IPCC reports are wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Find ONE thing of value the UN has
>>>>>>>>> ever produced.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **The IPCC reports.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL. Horse manure like the rest of their output.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **The prove it you idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> READ it, shithead. One million years of Ice Ages? LOL
>>>>
>>>> **You need to read the IPCC reports and issue your page by page refutation.
>>>>
>>>> Over to you.
>>>
>>> One million years of Ice Ages? The IPCC reports that you praise so
>>> much, and which you obviously haven't even read, disagree with you.
>>>
>>> Back over to you.
>>
>> **Again: READ the IPCC reports, before you attempt to refute them.
>
> Again, see what the GLOSSARY has to say about Ice Ages.

**You have not read the IPCC reports, yet you continue to condemn them.

Why?

>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YOU get to do the proving.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THATS how it works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **How it works is that YOU need to learn some basic science, before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making an (bigger) idiot of yourself. Start here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.ipcc.ch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UN? You cannot be serious!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **As I stated before: YOU need to submit your refutation of the science.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't forget: Like any scientific paper, I expect that you will submit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yours for peer review.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I will make it VERY easy for you, because I realise that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chances of you refuting the IPCC reports is an impossibility. You lack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the resources, the will and the intellect to do so. All you need to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is prove that Svante Arrhenius, who formulated AGW theory way back in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1899, got it wrong. It has been estimated that Arrhenius performed as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many as 100,000 hand calculations to formulate his theory. You could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrange for those same calculations to be performed on a cheap computer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in a second of two today. So, easy for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove that Svante Arrhenius was wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW: Many have tried and none have succeeded. Nonetheless, you might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> succeed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove Arrhenius wrong or shut the fuck up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove that he was correct or YOU shut the fuck up, dickhead. Once
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more, the anus[sic] is on you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> **Arrhenius has been shown to be correct. _I_ don't need to prove. YOU
>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that Arrhenius was wrong. Prove it or shut the fuck up.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have not claimed that he was wrong,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> **Yes, you have. Many times.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Where? Be specific now, convict spawn!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **Prove that Arrhenius was wrong.,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WHERE have I claimed he was wrong, convict spawn?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I just want *you* to prove he
>>>>>>>>>>> was correct.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> **I don't need to. Arrhenius proved his theory correct. Not once in the
>>>>>>>>>> past 120 years has anyone proven him to be incorrect.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you claim. Now prove it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **Asked and answered. Arrhenius has already supplied the proof.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **Arrhenius has already proven his claim.
>>>>>
>>>>> He didn't even MENTION Ice Ages.
>>>>
>>>> **So? Arrhenius wrote about HUMAN influence on the climate. His theory
>>>> has never been disproven. Not by you. Not by anyone.
>>>
>>> We all KNOW about HUMAN influence on the climate. Now what about ICE
>>> AGES?
>>>
>>> And where are the PEER REVIEWS? Find just ONE!
>>
>> **Again: NOT ONCE has Arrhenius been proven incorrect. Not by you. Not
>> by anyone.
>
> Has he even ONCE been peer reviewed? By ANYONE?

On 11/01/2023 9:37 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:

>
> Actually, the beneficiary of your anilingus, Twevor Wislon, seems to
> think there have only been glaciations for the most recent million
> years.
>

**Wrong.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

On 11/01/2023 9:49 am, Rod Speed wrote:
> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>
> <reams of your endless mindless stupid repetition and lies flushed where
> it belongs>
>
>> So? Arrhenius wrote about HUMAN influence on the climate. His theory
>> has never been disproven. Not by you. Not by anyone.
>
> His theory doesn't explain why the CO2 has hiked massively
> while the temperature has at most hiked by a pathetic just 1C
>

**Are you now claiming that Arrhenius was wrong?

Prove it.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

On 11/01/2023 10:06 am, Rod Speed wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:58:35 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2023 8:35 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:58:22 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/01/2023 11:59 pm, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 09:03:02 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/01/2023 10:23 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:15:53 +0000, KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <b'rissed>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WHY is Twevor Wilson ignoring this FACT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **I ignore nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am, however, STILL waiting for you to provide your proof that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Arrhenius was wrong.
>>>>>> * The IPCC reports are wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have failed miserably in supporting your claims.
>>>>>
>>>>> You haven't even read the IPCC reports.  If you had, you wouldn't have
>>>>> claimed that Ice Ages only covered the last million years.
>>>>
>>>> **Did I make such a claim?
>>>>
>>>> Cite.
>>>  I already did that <sigh>.  Here it is again:
>>>  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>> Message-Id: <k1gte6FnsslU1@mid.individual.net>
>>>  **Points:
>>>  * We don't know if glaciations are cyclical or not.
>>> * The regularity of glaciations is highly variable (+/- 50kyr).
>>> * The history of this planet stretches to around 4.5 billion years.
>>> The history of glacial periods is less than 1 million years.
>>> * We need a great deal more information to determine if there is a
>>> cyclical nature to glaciations.
>>>  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>>  You see where it says 1 million years?  Explain your way out of that,
>>> shithead.
>>
>> **Read what I wrote. CAREFULLY.
>>
>>>
>>>>>>> "The five major ice ages in the paleo record include the Huronian
>>>>>>> glaciation (2.4 billion to 2.1 billion years ago), the Cryogenian
>>>>>>> glaciation (720 million to 635 million years ago), the
>>>>>>> Andean-Saharan
>>>>>>> glaciation (450 million to 420 million years ago), the Late
>>>>>>> Paleozoic
>>>>>>> ice age (335 million to 260 million years ago) and the Quaternary
>>>>>>> glaciation (2.7 million years ago to present)."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The polar ice caps are proof that we are still in a mega Ice Age.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **Ummm, nope. We are in a cool period, but the planet is warming
>>>>>> rapidly. As Arrhenius predicted and as the IPCC has reported.
>>>>>
>>>>> Idiot. Every mega Ice Age had a warming period as it waned.
>>>>
>>>> **Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is
>>>> warming.
>>>  Every mega ICE AGE has a cooling period followed by a warming period.
>>> We are LEAVING the current mega ice age. The real question is how soon
>>> we will have a mini ice age similar to those in the Middle Ages when
>>> the Thames would regularly freeze over.
>>
>> **Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is warming.
>>
>> I don't want a history lesson. I want to hear your scientific
>> explanation of how it can occur.
>
> Don't need on given that it clearly did happen, repeatedly.

**Again: I don't want a history lesson. I want to hear your scientific
explanation of how this planet can enter an ice age, whilst temperatures
are RISING.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

On 11/01/2023 9:50 am, Rod Speed wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:58:22 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
> <reams of your endless mindless stupid repetition and lies flushed where
> it belongs>
>
>> Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is warming.
>
> The planet stops warming and starts cooling and it did that repeatedly,
> fuckwit.

**You're providing me with a history lesson. Not interested.

Provide a scientific explanation of how this planet can enter an ice age
whilst temperatures are RISING.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:50:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:58:22 +1100, Trevor Wilson
><trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
><reams of your endless mindless stupid repetition and lies flushed where
>it belongs>
>
>> Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is warming.
>
>The planet stops warming and starts cooling and it did that repeatedly,
>fuckwit.
>
Shhh don't tell Tevor the truth
--
Petzl
Wind generators have a very limited life span
(about 15 years I have heard).
The entire energy used to manufacture them and dismantle them
is probably greater than the electricity
that they generated in their entire lifetime!!!
They were never an option for base-load power for industry anyway!
Still - they kept a lot people in employment
while they were flavour of the month
.........................................in China!!!

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:07:22 +1100, David <not@home.org> wrote:

>
> Learn to read, "KKKernal Corn"!
>
> "The amount of anthropogenic greenhouse gases emitted into Earth's
> oceans and atmosphere is predicted to prevent the next glacial period
> for the next 500,000 years, which otherwise would begin in around
> 50,000 years, and likely more glacial cycles after."

Just because some fool claims something...

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:54:46 +1100, Trevor Wilson
<trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

> On 11/01/2023 9:49 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>> <reams of your endless mindless stupid repetition and lies flushed
>> where it belongs>
>>
>>> So? Arrhenius wrote about HUMAN influence on the climate. His theory
>>> has never been disproven. Not by you. Not by anyone.
>> His theory doesn't explain why the CO2 has hiked massively
>> while the temperature has at most hiked by a pathetic just 1C

> Are you now claiming that Arrhenius was wrong?

I clearly said

His theory doesn't explain why the CO2 has hiked massively
while the temperature has at most hiked by a pathetic just 1C

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:56:22 +1100, Trevor Wilson
<trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

> On 11/01/2023 10:06 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:58:35 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/01/2023 8:35 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:58:22 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/01/2023 11:59 pm, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 09:03:02 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/01/2023 10:23 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:15:53 +0000, KKKernal Corn
>>>>>>>> <vet@invalid.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <b'rissed>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WHY is Twevor Wilson ignoring this FACT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **I ignore nothing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am, however, STILL waiting for you to provide your proof that:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Arrhenius was wrong.
>>>>>>> * The IPCC reports are wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have failed miserably in supporting your claims.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You haven't even read the IPCC reports. If you had, you wouldn't
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> claimed that Ice Ages only covered the last million years.
>>>>>
>>>>> **Did I make such a claim?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cite.
>>>> I already did that <sigh>. Here it is again:
>>>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>>> Message-Id: <k1gte6FnsslU1@mid.individual.net>
>>>> **Points:
>>>> * We don't know if glaciations are cyclical or not.
>>>> * The regularity of glaciations is highly variable (+/- 50kyr).
>>>> * The history of this planet stretches to around 4.5 billion years.
>>>> The history of glacial periods is less than 1 million years.
>>>> * We need a great deal more information to determine if there is a
>>>> cyclical nature to glaciations.
>>>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>>> You see where it says 1 million years? Explain your way out of that,
>>>> shithead.
>>>
>>> **Read what I wrote. CAREFULLY.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> "The five major ice ages in the paleo record include the Huronian
>>>>>>>> glaciation (2.4 billion to 2.1 billion years ago), the Cryogenian
>>>>>>>> glaciation (720 million to 635 million years ago), the
>>>>>>>> Andean-Saharan
>>>>>>>> glaciation (450 million to 420 million years ago), the Late
>>>>>>>> Paleozoic
>>>>>>>> ice age (335 million to 260 million years ago) and the Quaternary
>>>>>>>> glaciation (2.7 million years ago to present)."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The polar ice caps are proof that we are still in a mega Ice Age.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Ummm, nope. We are in a cool period, but the planet is warming
>>>>>>> rapidly. As Arrhenius predicted and as the IPCC has reported.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Idiot. Every mega Ice Age had a warming period as it waned.
>>>>>
>>>>> **Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is
>>>>> warming.
>>>> Every mega ICE AGE has a cooling period followed by a warming period.
>>>> We are LEAVING the current mega ice age. The real question is how soon
>>>> we will have a mini ice age similar to those in the Middle Ages when
>>>> the Thames would regularly freeze over.
>>>
>>> **Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is
>>> warming.
>>>
>>> I don't want a history lesson. I want to hear your scientific
>>> explanation of how it can occur.
>> Don't need one given that it clearly did happen, repeatedly.
>
> Again: I don't want a history lesson.

You have always been, and always will be completely and utterly irrelevant.

What you might or might not claim to not want in spades.

> I want to hear your scientific explanation of how this planet can enter
> an ice age, whilst temperatures are RISING.

You have always been, and always will be completely and utterly irrelevant.

What you might or might not claim to want in spades.

Don't need one given that it clearly did happen, repeatedly.

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:57:28 +1100, Trevor Wilson
<trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

> On 11/01/2023 9:50 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:58:22 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>> <reams of your endless mindless stupid repetition and lies flushed
>> where it belongs>
>>
>>> Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is warming.
>> The planet stops warming and starts cooling and it did that
>> repeatedly, fuckwit.

> You're providing me with a history lesson.

Actually rubbing your stupid nose in what happens, repeatedly.

> Not interested.

You have always been, and always will be completely and utterly irrelevant.

What you might or might not claim to be interested in spades.

> Provide a scientific explanation of how this planet can enter an ice age
> whilst temperatures are RISING.

Don't need one given that it clearly did happen, repeatedly.

On 11/01/2023 11:20 am, Rod Speed wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:54:46 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2023 9:49 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>>>  <reams of your endless mindless stupid repetition and lies flushed
>>> where it belongs>
>>>
>>>> So? Arrhenius wrote about HUMAN influence on the climate. His theory
>>>> has never been disproven. Not by you. Not by anyone.
>>>  His theory doesn't explain why the CO2 has hiked massively
>>> while the temperature has at most hiked by a pathetic just 1C
>
>> Are you now claiming that Arrhenius was wrong?
>
> I clearly said
>
>     His theory doesn't explain why the CO2 has hiked massively
>     while the temperature has at most hiked by a pathetic just 1C

**Are you now claiming that Arrhenius was wrong?

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> kept mindlessly
repeating the same shit, just like a 2 year old.

In alt.global-warming Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> kept mindlessly
> repeating the same shit, just like a 2 year old.

I don't know why undertakers complain: epitaphs write themselves.

--
Listener:
>>[PM] Julia Gillard is lucky we don't have the guillotine in these days.
Allan Jones:
>Yep. Bring back the guillotine. I'm happy people are angry.
-- Allan Jones, Sydney Talkback Radio, July 2011

Trevor Wilson
/cross posting to metal asylum quality political sewage newsgroups
terminated/
/snip some idiot content/

> **Again: I don't want a history lesson. I want to hear your scientific
> explanation of how this planet can enter an ice age, whilst temperatures
> are RISING.

It is all your fault Trevor failing to understand the capitalist hard
right's methodical double think...if one could call that deranged mental
absurdity thinking at all.
You see they have absolutely no issues with imagining ice formation in
boiling water.

--
Ördög
"A reminder for your mortification"

Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote

Hilarious
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-11/sun-cable-enters-administration/101845100

On 11/01/2023 12:36 pm, *Ördög* the real newsgroup Devil wrote:
> Trevor Wilson
> /cross posting to metal asylum quality political sewage newsgroups
> terminated/
> /snip some idiot content/
>
>> **Again: I don't want a history lesson. I want to hear your scientific
>> explanation of how this planet can enter an ice age, whilst
>> temperatures are RISING.
>
> It is all your fault Trevor failing to understand the capitalist hard
> right's methodical double think...if one could call that deranged mental
> absurdity thinking at all.
> You see they have absolutely no issues with imagining ice formation in
> boiling water.
>

**Ah, that explains it.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

Rod Speed wrote on 11/1/23 11:56 am:
> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> kept mindlessly
> repeating the same shit, just like a 2 year old.

Yes, Roddles, I've noticed that you do this ..... and everyone has to
PROVE what they present whereas YOU, Roddles, just have to be accepted
as read!!
--
Daniel

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:42:23 +1100, Fran
<gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
wrote:

>On 11/01/2023 12:02 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:

<b'rissed>

>>>>>> Listen here, convict spawn:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep. Having had British convicts shipped to our shores is a history we
>>>>> share with the US which also had convicts shipped to the shores of it's[sic]
>>>>> colonies.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing on the scale of Oztralia's transportations.
>>>
>>> ?????? Nothing I wrote referred to number of convicts transported. But
>>> then you never can read well.
>>
>> ALL of Oztralia's original 'immigrants' were convicts. Most of the
>> recent ones have been too!
>
>Korn, your ignorance is already well proven so there is no need for yo
>to keep parading it.

Cunt, your shitty little island's history is already well known.
There's no point trying to deny it.

>>> And illiteracy
>>>> noted.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Oztralian immigration officer to new arrival: Do you have a criminal
>>>> record?
>>>> New arrival: I didn't know that was still a requirement.
>>>
>>> Nah, that was the immigration officer at Ellis Island.
>>
>> Nah, it wasn't.
>>
>>>>> It's amazing how many Americans are ignorant of their nation's convict
>>>>> history. They parade their ignorance when they try to insult
>>>>> Australians about our convict past.
>>>>
>>>> STFU, convict spawn.
>>>
>>> Nope. Sadly I don't have a single convict ancestor. They are highly
>>> desirable to have in one's tree.
>>
>> Bad blood is inherited.
>
>I'm sure you have lots of it.
>
>Only a bunch of retards on that silly little
>> upside down island of yours would find it 'desirable'.
>
>Yes,

I'm glad we agree on that, then.

>provincial and insular septics often make such ignorant comments.
>Americans should get out more but passpost ownership in the US has
>always been low when compared to more outward looking less parochial and
>narrow minded nations.

Why bother going to all these shitholes when all the information (and
more) is available on the Internet?

>>> I see that you haven't added a single comment
>>>> relevant to climate change or Ice Ages.
>>>
>>> Neither have you so it's not a requirement.
>>
>> Yes I have, you lying cunt.
>
>No, you haven't. You think your braying comments to Trevor are
>meaningful but all you contribute is trolling and ignorance.

I have exposed your anilingus beneficiary Twevor as an ignorant and
pompous twat who knows jack shit.

Now tell us what YOU know (LOL) about climate change and Ice Ages!

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:31:49 +1100, Fran
<gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
wrote:

>On 11/01/2023 12:01 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 11:51:57 +1100, Fran
>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/01/2023 11:13 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:07:16 +1100, Fran
>>>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/01/2023 12:17 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:52:37 +1100, Fran
>>>>>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/01/2023 11:16 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:22:06 +1100, Fran
>>>>>>>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/01/2023 11:20 pm, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:00:26 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> www.ipcc.ch
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> UN? You cannot be serious!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trevor please stop arguing with this moron as all his responses (and
>>>>>>>>> especially this one) reveal that that he's just another ill-educated,
>>>>>>>>> parochial, ignorant boob.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is that the best you can do, you obsequious asslicking piece of shite?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More proof of your lack of education and your ignorance. Learn to read.
>>>>>>> Or ask someone to explain arse licking.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No need. Do you even know what 'obsequious' MEANS?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course. Clearly you don't. Learn to read as currently you aren't
>>>>> competent.
>>>>
>>>> Pathetic. What are you, 5 years old?
>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't do any arse licking. I did describe you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have been licking Twevor's ass wholesale. It describes YOU,
>>>>>> shithead.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's your fantasy.
>>>>
>>>> It's your daily obligation.
>>>
>>> Your fantasy is all your own work.
>>
>> It's not your fantasy, it's your reality.
>
>My reality is that I'm reading your dimwitted, dull and stupid comments.
> Sadly, you don't understand what you read but then turn your fantasies
>into your reality.

Even more sadly, your tongue has been up Twevor's rear end so much
that you don't even know this is your reality.

>>>>> You clearly don't read well enough to understand that my words described
>>>>> you. I never implied that Trevor's arse has been, or needs, licking.
>>>>> Effectively I told you that you are a know nothing, uneducated and
>>>>> narrow minded fuckwit and I asked Trevor to stop playing with you.
>>>>> But I'm sure you still won't get that message despite my repeating it.
>>>>
>>>> Are you going to make ANY contribution to the topic of this thread or
>>>> are you simply going to keep brown-nosing Twevor?
>>>
>>> I never have brown nosed Trevor.
>>
>> Yes you have and yes you do, cunt.
>
>Your gutter background is evident enough in all of your other posts so
>repeated evidence from you is not required.

Your convict and prostitute heritage has made you what you are. There
is no escape from inherited bad blood.

>>> But then to someone like you, my using
>>> the word 'please' probably does constitute brown nosing.
>>
>> To someone like you, there's nothing wrong with brown nosing.
>
> From someone like you who can't read, your conclusions are irrelevant.

From someone like you who brown noses constantly, your opinions can be
dismissed as irrelevant.

>Do you
>> tickle your clit (if any) while doing so?
>
>As I said, your gutter background is evident enough without more proof.

As I said, your convict and prostitute heritage has made you what you
are. If that's not a gutter background, I don't know what is.

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:58:35 +1100, Trevor Wilson
<trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

>On 11/01/2023 8:35 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:58:22 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/01/2023 11:59 pm, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 09:03:02 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/01/2023 10:23 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:15:53 +0000, KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <b'rissed>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WHY is Twevor Wilson ignoring this FACT?
>>>>>
>>>>> **I ignore nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am, however, STILL waiting for you to provide your proof that:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Arrhenius was wrong.
>>>>> * The IPCC reports are wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have failed miserably in supporting your claims.
>>>>
>>>> You haven't even read the IPCC reports. If you had, you wouldn't have
>>>> claimed that Ice Ages only covered the last million years.
>>>
>>> **Did I make such a claim?
>>>
>>> Cite.
>>
>> I already did that <sigh>. Here it is again:
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>> Message-Id: <k1gte6FnsslU1@mid.individual.net>
>>
>> **Points:
>>
>> * We don't know if glaciations are cyclical or not.
>> * The regularity of glaciations is highly variable (+/- 50kyr).
>> * The history of this planet stretches to around 4.5 billion years.
>> The history of glacial periods is less than 1 million years.
>> * We need a great deal more information to determine if there is a
>> cyclical nature to glaciations.
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> You see where it says 1 million years? Explain your way out of that,
>> shithead.
>
>**Read what I wrote. CAREFULLY.

Explain what you think you wrote. CAREFULLY. Everyone can see what
you DID write.

How about starting with "What I really meant to say was..."?

This should be good.

>>
>>>>>> "The five major ice ages in the paleo record include the Huronian
>>>>>> glaciation (2.4 billion to 2.1 billion years ago), the Cryogenian
>>>>>> glaciation (720 million to 635 million years ago), the Andean-Saharan
>>>>>> glaciation (450 million to 420 million years ago), the Late Paleozoic
>>>>>> ice age (335 million to 260 million years ago) and the Quaternary
>>>>>> glaciation (2.7 million years ago to present)."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The polar ice caps are proof that we are still in a mega Ice Age.
>>>>>
>>>>> **Ummm, nope. We are in a cool period, but the planet is warming
>>>>> rapidly. As Arrhenius predicted and as the IPCC has reported.
>>>>
>>>> Idiot. Every mega Ice Age had a warming period as it waned.
>>>
>>> **Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is warming.
>>
>> Every mega ICE AGE has a cooling period followed by a warming period.
>> We are LEAVING the current mega ice age. The real question is how soon
>> we will have a mini ice age similar to those in the Middle Ages when
>> the Thames would regularly freeze over.
>
>**Explain how the planet can enter an ice age, if the planet is warming.
>
>I don't want a history lesson. I want to hear your scientific
>explanation of how it can occur.

Read it again. We are not ENTERING an Ice Age, we are LEAVING the
current (Quaternary) one: the warming period always follows the
cooliing period. I want to hear your scientific explanation of how
you can't understand that.

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:52:55 +1100, Fran
<gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
wrote:

>On 11/01/2023 9:37 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:59:20 +1100, Fran
>> <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/01/2023 8:28 am, KKKernal Corn wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:56:13 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> **YOU are the one claiming that all the peer-reviewed science in the
>>>>>>> IPCC reports is wrong, yet you offer ZERO proof of your claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You haven't even READ the IPCC reports. That much is obvious.
>>>>>
>>>>> **I have read MUCH of the IPCC reports. I have not read ALL the reports
>>>>> in their entirety.
>>>>>
>>>>> YOU, OTOH, have read not one word of the IPCC reports.
>>>>
>>>> You should have started with the GLOSSARY, you silly convict spawn.
>>>
>>> It's clear that YOU never read the glossary.
>>
>> It's absolutely clear you can't even UNDERSTAND the glossary.
>
>Unlike you, I can find it, read it and understand it.

Obviously not.

>>>> That might have told you something about ICE AGES.
>>>
>>> You should take your own advice. Start with the glossary of the IPCC.
>>>
>>> THEN you'll find out it says nothing about ice ages that anyone here
>>> doesn't already know:
>>> "An ice age or glacial period is characterized by a long-term reduction
>>> in the temperature of the Earth's climate, resulting in growth of ice
>>> sheets and glaciers."
>>> https://apps.ipcc.ch/glossary/
>>>
>>> or try an earlier version:
>>> "Ice age An informal term for a geological period characterised by a
>>> long-term reduction in the temperature48
>>> of the Earth's climate, resulting in the presence or expansion of ice
>>> sheets and glaciers. Among the Earth’s49
>>> ice ages is the current Quaternary Period, characterized by alternating
>>> glacial and interglacial intervals."
>>> https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SOD_Glossary.pdf
>>
>> Actually,
>
>Actually, it's clear you never read the glossary, couldn't find it and
>even if you had found it, you wouldn't have understood it.

Actually, even though you've reposted the verbiage verbatim, you still
don't understand it.

>the beneficiary of your anilingus, Twevor Wislon, seems to
>> think there have only been glaciations for the most recent million
>> years.
>
>Yur fantasy interpretation of what you have convinced yourself he thinks
>is irrelevant.
>
>snip of more evidence of your gutter origins.

I'm waiting for him to wriggle out of what he said about glaciation
perods only covering the last million years.

I don't HAVE to wait for you to suck his rear end again.

On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 23:07:22 +0000 (UTC), David <not@home.org> wrote:

>
>Learn to read, "KKKernal Corn"!
>
>"The amount of anthropogenic greenhouse gases emitted into Earth's
>oceans and atmosphere is predicted to prevent the next glacial period
>for the next 500,000 years, which otherwise would begin in around
>50,000 years, and likely more glacial cycles after."

Eat shit, "David".

We're ALREADY in a glacial period, the Quaternary, which began 2.7
million years ago. The gap between glacial periods has varied
tremendously in the past and will do so in the future.

When global warming kills off 95% of the Earth's population, WHO is
going to keep producing greenhouse gases?