On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>> read'  (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>
>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>
>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>
>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
>>>>>
>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,  what
>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>
>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>
>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'll take that as a no.
>>
> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested
> in debate, to learn -  only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
>
> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?

Is that a 'no'?

You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
counters yours.

On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>
>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>
>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested
>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
>>
>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>
> Is that a 'no'?
>
> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
> counters yours.

coherent is probably the word you are looking for.

--
Lady Astor: "If you were my husband I'd give you poison."
Churchill: "If you were my wife, I'd drink it."

On 01/01/2024 16:29, Steve wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 12:48:01 +0000
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right
>>>>>> wing, because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay
>>>>>> their salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely
>>>>>> so candid leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites
>>>>>> you read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she
>>>>>> can be well misinformed).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
>>>>>> *true*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
>>>>>> brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC
>>>>>> and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you
>>>>>> about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable energy
>>>>>> and net zero, and in general anything they take a political
>>>>>> stance on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
>>>>>> what reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>>
>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>
>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>
>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>> interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and
>> faux logic.
>>
>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>
>>
> Ooooh, a tetchy turnip.
>
> I'll take that as an emphatic no.
>
>
I'll take that as a yes, then
Disgusting

--
“The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to
fill the world with fools.”

Herbert Spencer

On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>>
>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>
>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested
>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
>>>
>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>
>> Is that a 'no'?
>>
>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>> counters yours.
>
> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>

Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.

--
“The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to
fill the world with fools.”

Herbert Spencer

In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>,
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
> > On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> >>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
> >>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
> >>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
> >>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
> >>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
> >>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
> >>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
> >>>>>>> conspiracy
> >>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
> >>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
> >>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
> >>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
> >>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
> >>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
> >>>>>>> be well misinformed).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
> >>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
> >>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
> >>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
> >>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
> >>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
> >>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
> >>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
> >>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
> >>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
> >>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
> >>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
> >>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll take that as a no.
> >>>>
> >>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested
> >>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
> >>>
> >>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
> >>
> >> Is that a 'no'?
> >>
> >> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
> >> counters yours.
> >
> > coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
> >

> Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.

Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
wrote:

> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>>
>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>
>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>>> interested
>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
>>>
>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>
>> Is that a 'no'?
>>
>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>> counters yours.
>
> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.

Not if its a shit of an argument

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--
Xeno to senile Rodent:
"You're a sad old man Rod, truly sad."
MID: <id04c3F50peU1@mid.individual.net>

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
>wrote:
>
>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
>>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
>>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
>>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
>>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
>>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
>>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
>>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
>>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
>>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
>>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
>>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
>>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
>>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
>>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>>
>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>>>> interested
>>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
>>>>
>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>>
>>> Is that a 'no'?
>>>
>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>>> counters yours.
>>
>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>
>Not if its a shit of an argument

Children! Behave yourselves!

If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.

On 01/01/2024 21:08, charles wrote:
> In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>,
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
>>>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
>>>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
>>>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
>>>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
>>>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
>>>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
>>>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
>>>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
>>>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
>>>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
>>>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
>>>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
>>>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
>>>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested
>>>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>>>
>>>> Is that a 'no'?
>>>>
>>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>>>> counters yours.
>>>
>>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>>>
>
>> Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
>
> Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.
>
Shame he never learnt from the experience. He was, in my direct
experience, a total shit.

--
“The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the
urge to rule it.”
– H. L. Mencken

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:11:06 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
>>>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right
>>>>>>>>> wing,
>>>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
>>>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so
>>>>>>>>> candid
>>>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
>>>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
>>>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
>>>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
>>>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
>>>>>>>>> *true*.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
>>>>>>>>> brain
>>>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about
>>>>>>>>> climate
>>>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero,
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
>>>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>>>>> interested
>>>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>>>
>>>> Is that a 'no'?
>>>>
>>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>>>> counters yours.
>>>
>>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>>
>> Not if its a shit of an argument
>
>
> Children! Behave yourselves!
>
> If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.

Go and fuck yourself, again.

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:12:40 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:11:06 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
>>>>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right
>>>>>>>>>> wing,
>>>>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
>>>>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so
>>>>>>>>>> candid
>>>>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
>>>>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
>>>>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
>>>>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
>>>>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
>>>>>>>>>> brain
>>>>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about
>>>>>>>>>> climate
>>>>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero,
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
>>>>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>>>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>>>>>> interested
>>>>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that a 'no'?
>>>>>
>>>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>>>>> counters yours.
>>>>
>>>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>>>
>>> Not if its a shit of an argument
>>
>>
>> Children! Behave yourselves!
>>
>> If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.
>
>Go and fuck yourself, again.

Gosh, you can't even design original insults. Electronics is way out
of your league.

There is about a 100% negative correlation between electronic design
talent and foul, crude behavior. That makes perfect sense.

On 2/01/2024 10:11 am, John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:

<snip>

> Children! Behave yourselves!
>
> If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.

Not a competition that John Larkin would take part in, unless he was
convinced that he would win it, and he'd do a Trump if he didn't.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:19:03 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:12:40 +1100, "Rod Speed"
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:11:06 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
>>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some
>>>>>>>>>>> depth,
>>>>>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right
>>>>>>>>>>> wing,
>>>>>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay
>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so
>>>>>>>>>>> candid
>>>>>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she
>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists
>>>>>>>>>>> making
>>>>>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy
>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
>>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
>>>>>>>>>>> brain
>>>>>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about
>>>>>>>>>>> climate
>>>>>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero,
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and
>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>>>>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>>>>>>> interested
>>>>>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux
>>>>>>> logic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that a 'no'?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>>>>>> counters yours.
>>>>>
>>>>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>>>>
>>>> Not if its a shit of an argument
>>>
>>>
>>> Children! Behave yourselves!
>>>
>>> If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.

>> Go and fuck yourself, again.

> Gosh, you can't even design original insults.

You don't qualify for an original insult.

Plenty of others have done.

> Electronics is way out of your league.

There you go, face down in the fucking mud, as always.

Done a hell of a lot more of that than you have ever done, thanks.

> There is about a 100% negative correlation betweenelectronic design
> talent and foul, crude behavior.

Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something.

In article <umvhro$2c854$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 01/01/2024 21:08, charles wrote:
> > In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
> > <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
> >>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> >>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000 The Natural Philosopher
> >>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000 The Natural Philosopher
> >>>>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000 Cursitor Doom
> >>>>>>>>>> <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab? Anyone still
> >>>>>>>>>>> convinced Covid arose naturally?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
> >>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some
> >>>>>>>>> depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable
> >>>>>>>>> explanations from conspiracy - most academics are left wing,
> >>>>>>>>> because the gummint pays their salaries, most career scientists
> >>>>>>>>> and technologosts are right wing, because they know what works
> >>>>>>>>> - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what position
> >>>>>>>>> you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan
> >>>>>>>>> sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the
> >>>>>>>>> BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists
> >>>>>>>>> making money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement.
> >>>>>>>>> It's not right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring
> >>>>>>>>> by the people who used to be in the Communist party.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy
> >>>>>>>>> from within by telling tales about its government.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
> >>>>>>>>> *true*.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
> >>>>>>>>> brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the
> >>>>>>>>> BBC and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to
> >>>>>>>>> you about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable
> >>>>>>>>> energy and net zero, and in general anything they take a
> >>>>>>>>> political stance on.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and
> >>>>>>>>> we will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
> >>>>>>>>> what reason would they have to exist any more?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
> >>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions. When did you stop fucking your
> >>>>>>> pet rabbit?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
> >>>>> interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and
> >>>>> faux logic.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
> >>>>
> >>>> Is that a 'no'?
> >>>>
> >>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
> >>>> counters yours.
> >>>
> >>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
> >>>
> >
> >> Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
> >
> > Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.
> >
> Shame he never learnt from the experience. He was, in my direct
> experience, a total shit.

so, you actually met him?

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:12:40 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--
Website (from 2007) dedicated to the nonagenarian and senile Australian
cretin's pathological trolling:
https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/rod-speed-faq.2973853/

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:01:44 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

On 02/01/2024 08:00, charles wrote:
> In article <umvhro$2c854$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 01/01/2024 21:08, charles wrote:
>>> In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
>>>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000 The Natural Philosopher
>>>>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000 The Natural Philosopher
>>>>>>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000 Cursitor Doom
>>>>>>>>>>>> <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab? Anyone still
>>>>>>>>>>>>> convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some
>>>>>>>>>>> depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>> explanations from conspiracy - most academics are left wing,
>>>>>>>>>>> because the gummint pays their salaries, most career scientists
>>>>>>>>>>> and technologosts are right wing, because they know what works
>>>>>>>>>>> - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what position
>>>>>>>>>>> you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan
>>>>>>>>>>> sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the
>>>>>>>>>>> BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists
>>>>>>>>>>> making money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement.
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring
>>>>>>>>>>> by the people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy
>>>>>>>>>>> from within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
>>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
>>>>>>>>>>> brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the
>>>>>>>>>>> BBC and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to
>>>>>>>>>>> you about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable
>>>>>>>>>>> energy and net zero, and in general anything they take a
>>>>>>>>>>> political stance on.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and
>>>>>>>>>>> we will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
>>>>>>>>>>> what reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions. When did you stop fucking your
>>>>>>>>> pet rabbit?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>>>>>>> interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and
>>>>>>> faux logic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that a 'no'?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>>>>>> counters yours.
>>>>>
>>>>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>> Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
>>>
>>> Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.
>>>
>> Shame he never learnt from the experience. He was, in my direct
>> experience, a total shit.
>
> so, you actually met him?
>
Not me. friend had extensive dealings with him. Tam encouraged him to
blow the whistle on his employers, which information Tam used to enhance
his career, whilst my friend got the sack and was made unemployable.

--
Any fool can believe in principles - and most of them do!

On 02/01/2024 04:01, Rod Speed wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:19:03 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:

<snip>

>> Electronics is way out  of your league.
>
> There you go, face down in the fucking mud, as always.
>
> Done a hell of a lot more of that than you have ever done, thanks.

What do you have in mind?

I haven't seen any evidence of you doing anything constructive, simply
resorting to abuse when your shortcomings are exposed.

In article <un0p3c$2kn1n$1@dont-email.me>,
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 02/01/2024 08:00, charles wrote:
> > In article <umvhro$2c854$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
> > <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> On 01/01/2024 21:08, charles wrote:
> >>> In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
> >>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>> On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
> >>>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000 The Natural Philosopher
> >>>>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000 The Natural Philosopher
> >>>>>>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000 Cursitor Doom
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab? Anyone still
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> convinced Covid arose naturally?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
> >>>>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some
> >>>>>>>>>>> depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable
> >>>>>>>>>>> explanations from conspiracy - most academics are left wing,
> >>>>>>>>>>> because the gummint pays their salaries, most career scientists
> >>>>>>>>>>> and technologosts are right wing, because they know what works
> >>>>>>>>>>> - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what position
> >>>>>>>>>>> you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan
> >>>>>>>>>>> sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the
> >>>>>>>>>>> BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed).
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists
> >>>>>>>>>>> making money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement.
> >>>>>>>>>>> It's not right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring
> >>>>>>>>>>> by the people who used to be in the Communist party.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy
> >>>>>>>>>>> from within by telling tales about its government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
> >>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
> >>>>>>>>>>> brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the
> >>>>>>>>>>> BBC and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to
> >>>>>>>>>>> you about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable
> >>>>>>>>>>> energy and net zero, and in general anything they take a
> >>>>>>>>>>> political stance on.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and
> >>>>>>>>>>> we will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
> >>>>>>>>>>> what reason would they have to exist any more?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
> >>>>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions. When did you stop fucking your
> >>>>>>>>> pet rabbit?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
> >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
> >>>>>>> interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and
> >>>>>>> faux logic.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is that a 'no'?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
> >>>>>> counters yours.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>> Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
> >>>
> >>> Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.
> >>>
> >> Shame he never learnt from the experience. He was, in my direct
> >> experience, a total shit.
> >
> > so, you actually met him?
> >
> Not me. friend had extensive dealings with him. Tam encouraged him to
> blow the whistle on his employers, which information Tam used to enhance
> his career,

Did Tam ever rise above being a back-bench MP?

> whilst my friend got the sack and was made unemployable.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:01:44 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:19:03 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:12:40 +1100, "Rod Speed"
>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:11:06 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
>>>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some
>>>>>>>>>>>> depth,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
>>>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>>>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
>>>>>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right
>>>>>>>>>>>> wing,
>>>>>>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay
>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so
>>>>>>>>>>>> candid
>>>>>>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists
>>>>>>>>>>>> making
>>>>>>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's
>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy
>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
>>>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
>>>>>>>>>>>> brain
>>>>>>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about
>>>>>>>>>>>> climate
>>>>>>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and
>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>>>>>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>>>>>>>> interested
>>>>>>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux
>>>>>>>> logic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that a 'no'?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>>>>>>> counters yours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not if its a shit of an argument
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Children! Behave yourselves!
>>>>
>>>> If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.
>
>>> Go and fuck yourself, again.
>
>> Gosh, you can't even design original insults.
>
>You don't qualify for an original insult.
>
>Plenty of others have done.
>
>> Electronics is way out of your league.
>
>There you go, face down in the fucking mud, as always.
>
>Done a hell of a lot more of that than you have ever done, thanks.

Show is a cool circuit that you have designed, and we'll have a
friendly discussion about it.

Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote

>>> Electronics is way out of your league.

>> There you go, face down in the fucking mud, as always.

>> Done a hell of a lot more of that than you have ever done, thanks.

> What do you have in mind?

None of your business.

<reams of your shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed where it
belongs>

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 22:00:10 +1100, charles <charles@candehope.me.uk>
wrote:

> In article <un0p3c$2kn1n$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 02/01/2024 08:00, charles wrote:
>> > In article <umvhro$2c854$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
>> > <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> >> On 01/01/2024 21:08, charles wrote:
>> >>> In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
>> >>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>> On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
>> >>>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000 The Natural Philosopher
>> >>>>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000 The Natural Philosopher
>> >>>>>>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000 Cursitor Doom
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab? Anyone still
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> convinced Covid arose naturally?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some
>> >>>>>>>>>>> depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable
>> >>>>>>>>>>> explanations from conspiracy - most academics are left wing,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> because the gummint pays their salaries, most career
>> scientists
>> >>>>>>>>>>> and technologosts are right wing, because they know what
>> works
>> >>>>>>>>>>> - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what position
>> >>>>>>>>>>> you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green
>> vegan
>> >>>>>>>>>>> sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to
>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>> BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed).
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists
>> >>>>>>>>>>> making money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax
>> movement.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's not right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit
>> stirring
>> >>>>>>>>>>> by the people who used to be in the Communist party.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy
>> >>>>>>>>>>> from within by telling tales about its government.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
>> >>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into
>> your
>> >>>>>>>>>>> brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the
>> >>>>>>>>>>> BBC and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to
>> >>>>>>>>>>> you about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable
>> >>>>>>>>>>> energy and net zero, and in general anything they take a
>> >>>>>>>>>>> political stance on.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us
>> and
>> >>>>>>>>>>> we will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they
>> did*,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> what reason would they have to exist any more?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>> >>>>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions. When did you stop fucking
>> your
>> >>>>>>>>> pet rabbit?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>> >>>>>>> interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry
>> and
>> >>>>>>> faux logic.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Is that a 'no'?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>> >>>>>> counters yours.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
>> >>>
>> >>> Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.
>> >>>
>> >> Shame he never learnt from the experience. He was, in my direct
>> >> experience, a total shit.
>> >
>> > so, you actually met him?
>> >
>> Not me. friend had extensive dealings with him. Tam encouraged him to
>> blow the whistle on his employers, which information Tam used to enhance
>> his career,
>
> Did Tam ever rise above being a back-bench MP?

He was PPS to Crossman very early on but then shat in the
nest very enthusastically indeed and never managed anything
other and a real pest for the rest of his political 'career'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tam_Dalyell#Political_career

>> whilst my friend got the sack and was made unemployable.

On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 03:19:05 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:01:44 +1100, "Rod Speed"
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:19:03 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:12:40 +1100, "Rod Speed"
>>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:11:06 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
>>>>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater
>>>>>> <tim@streater.me.uk>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Righttarded fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, just a fruitcake.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that without a scientific education in some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> depth,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays
>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wing,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay
>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> candid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists
>>>>>>>>>>>>> making
>>>>>>>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> brain
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> climate
>>>>>>>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net
>>>>>>>>>>>>> zero,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look at UKIP...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't answer leading questions.
>>>>>>>>>>> When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll take that as a no.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
>>>>>>>>> interested
>>>>>>>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux
>>>>>>>>> logic.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is that a 'no'?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
>>>>>>>> counters yours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not if its a shit of an argument
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Children! Behave yourselves!
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.
>>
>>>> Go and fuck yourself, again.
>>
>>> Gosh, you can't even design original insults.
>>
>> You don't qualify for an original insult.
>>
>> Plenty of others have done.
>>
>>> Electronics is way out of your league.
>>
>> There you go, face down in the fucking mud, as always.
>>
>> Done a hell of a lot more of that than you have ever done, thanks.
>
> Show is a cool circuit that you have designed, and we'll have a
> friendly discussion about it.

On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 03:58:05 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--
The Natural Philosopher about senile Rodent:
"Rod speed is not a Brexiteer. He is an Australian troll and arsehole."
Message-ID: <pu07vj$s5$2@dont-email.me>

On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 03:51:13 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--
FredXX to Rodent Speed:
"You are still an idiot and an embarrassment to your country. No wonder
we shipped the likes of you out of the British Isles. Perhaps stupidity
and criminality is inherited after all?"
Message-ID: <plbf76$gfl$1@dont-email.me>