On 2/10/2022 12:46 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 1/10/2022 10:55 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 29/09/2022 11:58 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2022 1:48 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 29/9/2022 1:24 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 29/09/2022 11:36 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> Noddy<me@home.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/09/2022 10:37 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 28/9/2022 10:32 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> It does. Every time I take it out I get smiles or waves from
>>>>>>>>> people,
>>>>>>>>> and often from people you wouldn't expect. Kids love it, and I got
>>>>>>>>> approached by a local copper after parking it in the village
>>>>>>>>> car park
>>>>>>>>> who I thought was going to ask to see my log book, but he
>>>>>>>>> wanted to
>>>>>>>>> ask if he could sit in it and have his pic taken as his old man
>>>>>>>>> was a
>>>>>>>>> Federal copper years ago who used to drive an F100 when they had a
>>>>>>>>> fleet of square 1970's models, and he wanted to send his Dad a
>>>>>>>>> pic of
>>>>>>>>> him sitting in mine :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL, that's pretty cool, just when you think the cop wants to
>>>>>>>> harass you
>>>>>>>> turns out he's just interested in your truck:-)
>>>>>>> Yeah, it was funny. I get all kinds of people admiring it which is
>>>>>>> something I never thought would happen as I would have thought it
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> only appeal to certain kinds of Neanderthals like me. But you get
>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>> kinds. Kids. Old ladies. Farmers. Cops. You name it. In fact I
>>>>>>> just got
>>>>>>> home from taking it out this morning and as I was getting out after
>>>>>>> parking it a young guy who works at the local Baker's Delight walked
>>>>>>> past as and said "Cool car".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some months ago I came out of the local Coles with a couple of
>>>>>>> bags of
>>>>>>> shopping and there was a young chick who had her phone on the ground
>>>>>>> filming herself doing a Tictoc dance in front of it. I just said "Go
>>>>>>> ahead" and waited a minute or so until she'd finished :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The level of interest is fascinating, and really quite
>>>>>>> unpredictable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attention whore you are then, *confirmed*!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really are a sad little man Darren!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ____
>>>>>> Xeno
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> what is your problem? he has a car that ppl admire and are
>>>>> interested in. he's done the work so he's entitled enjoy the
>>>>> accolades. nothing sad about that.
>>>>>
>>>> Only sad when he's calling *others* attention whores when he is one
>>>> himself. Also, IIRC, he didn't do the work, it was done by the
>>>> previous owner. Recall, he bought it *sight unseen*, then whinged
>>>> about what he'd got for his $50k.
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought it was beat up and he restored and repainted it
>>>
>>
>> Nah, he bought it like that and slapped some ridiculous looking white
>> wall tyres on it. 99% chance his Tik-Tok dance fantasy never happened
>> simply because young people into  Tik-Tok don't give a shit about some
>> fugly old truck.
>>
>>
>
> sounds right. he lives in a world of his imaginaiton
>
It goes well beyond his imagination I suspect. He lives in his own
delusional fantasyland and has long lost any ability to differentiate
between it and the real world - if he was ever even able to do that.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 30/09/2022 5:47 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 29/09/2022 9:24 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 29/09/2022 7:35 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2022 6:58 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 29/09/2022 5:47 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 29/09/2022 1:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/09/2022 11:10 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 8:07 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 7:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 6:54 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 1:03 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 9:52 am, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/9/2022 8:46 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently the new Ranger has a variable rate charge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system where the amount of charge the battery receives is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> variable. Often it's way less than the 13.8v minimum you'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect to see on a healthy conventional Alternator system,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the battery itself is usually only changed to 75% of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's capacity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another useless "fuel saving" idea that will be getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permanently disabled once the car gets here....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just something else to go wrong with very little if any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel saved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We just don't need this rubbish. It's been around for some
>>>>>>>>>>>> time now and does nothing other than add an extra element of
>>>>>>>>>>>> unreliability into the mix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you need to, then try the tyre dealer in Grant St
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bacchus near the corner of Main St. He's pretty good. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recently had to replace the battery in the Santa Fe which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crapped itself at not quite 4 years old which was a bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shitty. Price for a new replacement was around the 450
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mark at most places, but he supplied a new Bosch battery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 230 bucks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll keep them in mind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They're nice people, and pretty decent on their tyre prices
>>>>>>>>>>>> as well. They shit all over the local Bridgestone outlet.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Especially when it comes to tractor tyres.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if Jerky Birko ever managed to get the courage to
>>>>>>>>>>>> call them for the "full story" like he said he was gunna :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't need to, I already know you're a compulsive liar.
>>>>>>>>>>> However, remind us of why you balked at phoning Xeno's mate,
>>>>>>>>>>> you know the one you claimed didn't exist?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh that's right, you're not only a hypocritical habitual liar
>>>>>>>>>>> and a fraud, you're a coward as well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's funny, I just spent a number of days in Holland and 2
>>>>>>>>>> weeks on a cruise where about 20% of the passengers were Dutch.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's "The Netherlands" or "Nederland" or "Kingdom of the
>>>>>>>>> Netherlands" but not "Holland". Never was but it wasn't exactly
>>>>>>>>> discouraged in the past but now it is official.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.ksby.com/the-netherlands-no-longer-called-holland/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So which province are Amsterdam and Volendam in?
>>>>>>>> Which province is Rotterdam in?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> People don't go around referring to "Australia" as Tasmania or
>>>>>>> Queensland or any other state or territory do they you daft twit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   Universally, they
>>>>>>>>>> were happy, helpful people and easy to get along with, perhaps
>>>>>>>>>> they just don't do well in the southern hemisphere.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm doing just fine and that description can be applied to me
>>>>>>>>> just as well. This place isn't real life. Imagine if it was!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unfortunately from the only point of view that we have here,
>>>>>>>> there is no evidence of that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're a dull and dimwitted bore and it isn't just what you post
>>>>>>> in here to confirm it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>> lick, lick, suck, suck.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> burp! fart! snot! extra smelly fart!...
>>>>
>>> No more than expected.
>>
>>
>> do you ever get tired of being a childish twat? because you are
>> certainly tiresome..
>>
>>
> Childish twat? I give you "burp! fart! snot! extra smelly fart!..." The
> prosecution rests Your Honour

Yes childish twat, the prosecution rested the case at "lick, lick, suck,
suck.". Evidently you're so dim that you don't even understand parody.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 29/09/2022 11:25 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 28/09/2022 9:54 pm, Daryl wrote:
>> On 28/9/2022 8:30 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2022 3:17 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>> On 28/9/2022 2:01 pm, jonz wrote:
>>>
>>>>>   Yes, *Every* time you post/repost yer irrelevant rubbish in here.
>>>>> Silly fixated fuckwit that you are...
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I wonder what he thinks anyone is going to use a truck that's well
>>>> over 60 yrs old for?
>>>
>>> He's a fucking idiot, but then you're talking about a bloke who's
>>> claim to automotive fame is collecting a yard full of Leyland
>>> Marina's, which ranks him at the top of the list of no life losers.
>>> Little wonder that his own wife won't even talk to him, and it's
>>> incredibly interesting to note that the only person in this group I
>>> know of who has actually met him in the flesh has gone from being one
>>> of his biggest supporters to one of his greatest critics seemingly as
>>> a direct result of that meeting.
>>>
>>> I expect that prolly has something to do with the bloke being an
>>> absolute fucking flog who didn't live up to expectations :)
>>>
>>>> No one in their right mind would use it as a work truck, apart from
>>>> being too valuable it can't compete with a modern work ute for
>>>> safety, economy and comfort so therefore its main use is showing it
>>>> off and there is nothing wrong with that at all.
>>>
>>> It's a cruiser, and just like any other classic vehicle used used for
>>> cruising duties there need be no more justification other than the
>>> desire to do so. However at the end of the day it *is* still a ute,
>>> and now that I don't have the Navara any more I've been using it for
>>> a few "ute" type tasks.
>>>
>>> I took 300 litres of used oil down to the recycling station in it the
>>> other day, and last week end I used it to go to the local Mire 10 to
>>> pick up some timber and a couple of door jambs as we're renovating
>>> the house.
>>>
>>> People got a kick out of seeing it earning it's keep.
>>>
>>>> In my experience people like to see interesting vehicles being used.
>>>
>>> They do indeed.
>>>
>>
>> When I wash my Porsche on my driveway neighbours that normal just wave
>> and drive past stop for a chat and want to have a look at the car,
>> from what I've seen the old F truck gets plenty of attention.
>>
>
> when I wash or park my Lancer... no one takes any notice..
>

Nobody takes any notice of a budget priced "Porsche" either. It's what
he likes t believe because wankers like Daz and the fraud crave attention.

Even if it's mostly in their own mind.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 2/10/2022 12:56 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 2/10/2022 12:42 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 1/10/2022 7:46 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 1/10/2022 12:35 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 30/09/2022 7:59 pm, jonz wrote:
>>>>> On 9/28/2022 10:26 PM, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2022 9:49 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/9/2022 8:30 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In my experience people like to see interesting vehicles being
>>>>>>>>> used.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They do indeed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've seen another one around similar to yours that I've seen
>>>>>>> towing a trailer and appears to be used for work, I haven't had
>>>>>>> a chance to have an up close look but IMHO to be used as a daily
>>>>>>> work vehicle it would need to have substantial mods such as
>>>>>>> modern suspension/steering, brakes and drive line.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is what I plan on doing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've got a series III XJ6 Jag here in the back yard which is
>>>>>> going to donate it's front and rear ends, brakes and steering for
>>>>>> the Effie. Front end, brakes and steering are definite as they're
>>>>>> a perfect into these old tubs which gives them a massive upgrade
>>>>>> in one go of independent suspension, 4 pot front brakes with
>>>>>> decent sized rotors and power assisted rack & pinion which it
>>>>>> desperately needs over it's current standard "Armstrong" steering
>>>>>> system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Jag rear is set as the preferred option in the interests of
>>>>>> not only keeping it all Jag/Chev bolt pattern, but to have the
>>>>>> inboard rear discs and independent rear which would give it an
>>>>>> excellent steering, brakes and handling package. Those big old
>>>>>> cats had shitty engines and hopeless electrics, but they stopped,
>>>>>> steered and handled pretty well for an 1800kg "sports" car :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The downside to the Jag rear is that you have to take them out of
>>>>>> the factory cradle to mount them into the narrow chassis, and
>>>>>> once you do that it starts to get complicated with regards to
>>>>>> soft mounting, radius rods and exhausts. It's certainly doable,
>>>>>> but it's not a 5 minute job. If it proves to be too much of a
>>>>>> headache then plan B is a Ford 8 inch on a triangulated 4 link
>>>>>> with coil overs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Engine wise the old Y block will be getting sold off to a local
>>>>>> bloke who has a Customline who is looking for a good running
>>>>>> engine and in it's place will be an AU XR8 220kW 5 litre roller
>>>>>> cam engine and a Chev 700R4 with a home made adapter. Not sure if
>>>>>> I'll go injector or carb yet. I have a decent small windsor carb
>>>>>> and manifold combo here that would work very well on it, but I'm
>>>>>> interested in the Holley Sniper idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We'll see how it pans out....
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>>   Well, I know what your reply will/would be. :).
>>>>
>>>> Along the lines of what I've already said really :)
>>>
>>> Methinks there was a hint of scepticism there. Talk is cheap and, in
>>> your case, sure to be lies and bullshit. You have form!
>>>>
>>>>>      But, if that were mine, *Everything* would be original, or
>>>>> NOS as far as possible.
>>>>
>>>> I don't disagree with that sentiment, but to me it depends on the
>>>> vehicle.
>>>>
>>>> Some vehicles deserve to be preserved in their original condition
>>>> because they are simply far too special to be made into anything
>>>> else. Some of the real classics, such as any wire wheel equipped
>>>> front engined Ferrari. A D type Jaguar. A Mercedes 300SL Gullwing.
>>>> A GTHO Falcon. A Boss 429 Mustang. Etc, ad infinitum. I have a love
>>>> of all kinds of classic cars and I visit as many shows as I can to
>>>> see as many of them in the flesh as possible, and I get a great
>>>> kick out of seeing some of the real rarities.
>>>>
>>>> When was the last time you saw an original Tucker "Torpedo" in the
>>>> flesh?
>>>
>>> Ahem Darren, no one has ever seen a *vehicle* "in the flesh". I hate
>>> to break it to you but cars are made of metal, mostly. Made of a
>>> fair chunk of plastic these days too but, assuredly, *no flesh*.
>>
>>
>> just a point of order, 'in the flesh' means 'in person', so bodily
>> present
>>
> A point of order to override your point of order. When you use the
> phrase; "in the flesh", you are referring to a *person*, a flesh and
> blood *human*, in front of you that you can actually *see* or *meet*
> rather than, say, see on TV. The phrase does *not* refer to inanimate
> objects like cars.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEEA7Y6
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEEA7Y5
>>>>
>>>> A pretty impressive machine, and it was a real treat to get to see
>>>> such an automotive oddity up close and personal.
>>>
>>> Yep, two of life's failures side by side, that'd be a treat to see.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, I *also* believe that some vehicles are prime
>>>> candidates for modification as it helps to make them more a
>>>> enjoyable experience, and early F-100's are such a vehicle in my
>>>> opinion. Don't get me wrong, as I can appreciate one that's been
>>>> restored to original spec, and in fact there is a guy who lives
>>>> about 10 minutes from me in a place called Hopetoun Park who has a
>>>> really nice '55 that he's restored down to the last nut, bolt and
>>>> screw.
>>>>
>>>> But he *also* has a modified '56 which has been kept looking mostly
>>>> original but with relatively modern mechanicals because, as he
>>>> said, "They drive like shit, and sometimes it's nice to cruise
>>>> around in something that looks the part but isn't hard work to
>>>> operate".
>>>>
>>>> And on that point I concur.
>>>
>>> Of course you would! A truck is a truck is a truck. They are
>>> intended to carry *loads*. That's what that tub in the arse end is
>>> for. It was never intended to be what you intend to use it for, a
>>> *poseur* vehicle. Darren, the word "poseur" is *100% perfect* when
>>> referring to you.
>>>
>>> poseur: noun
>>> a person who behaves affectedly in order to impress others.
>>>
>>> It applies to a person who is, in short, a liar, a cheat, or is
>>> simply *delusional*. Perfect fit for you, eh laddie?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not into radical customisations, as I'm too old for that
>>>> rubbish these days. But I like "Resto-mods", which is the art of
>>>> taking a
>>>
>>> Too crippled you mean.
>>>
>>>> classic car or truck and basically keeping it looking fairly
>>>> original but updating the mechanicals to make it a far more
>>>> practical and useful vehicle. And the creature comforts as well,
>>>> with things like power steering, air conditioning, power windows,
>>>> better seats, etc.
>>>>
>>>> My Effie is relatively standard, with only a small handful of
>>>> modifications. It has a disc brake upgrade and a C4 auto. It still
>>>> has it's original 272 Y block V8, but with a 4 barrel carb, arfet
>>>> market intake manifold and a nice set of headers. The engine is
>>>> otherwise completely stock. It still has it's leaf sprung front
>>>> beam axle, it's leaf sprung Dana 44 diff with appallingly useless
>>>> 3.92:1 gearing, it's woeful 27:1 ratio manual steering box and it's
>>>> under floor mounted master cylinder with a "tree stump" type brake
>>>> pedal that pokes up at you through the floor :)
>>>>
>>>> And as a result of all that, it drives like shit :)
>>>
>>> It is a *truck* of *fifties* vintage! What the hell do you *expect*
>>> it to drive like? Do you have *any inkling* at all of the
>>> technological development that commenced in *vehicular design* in
>>> the 70s and then ramped up significantly during the 90s. I recall
>>> being taken through the GMH Development Labs in the 80s and they had
>>> some serious computer hardware - just for testing - even in those
>>> early days. Cars of the 50s are archaic in comparison, trucks of the
>>> 50s even more so. But then, the people who drove them back in the
>>> 50s weren't a bunch of *poseurs* like you.
>>>>
>>>> It wanders all over the road, it doesn't stop well and it's
>>>> difficult to
>>
>>
>> if the damn thing is this unsafe all the more reason to fit proper
>> seat belts
>>
> More reason to apply a *canary* to the windscreen if you ask me.
>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, they did that if the steering was worn out. They also did that
>>> if the steering was set wrong. Typically caster on those. With the
>>> original leaf springs, they would have the correct caster. Of course
>>> those original springs would sag and get the wrong "set", hence the
>>> wandering. Get the springs reset incorrectly and you're in for a
>>> world of pain. Of course, it is only *caster*. Any *mechanic* could
>>> easily check that out in a trice. Oh, I see, that leaves a liar like
>>> you totally lost since it requires a modicum of knowledge in
>>> steering and suspension geometry. An apprenticeship in the motor
>>> trade would have been of significant benefit  but, since you didn't
>>> even qualify to sign up for one, you're at a total loss. Bluff and
>>> bluster can't even help you here.  ;-)
>>>
>>>> stop straight, the steering is as vague as Felix sitting an IQ test,
>>
>>
>> lol. any IQ test I've ever done would've trashed his anytime. he
>> confuses intellectual prowess with practical matters, like being
>> careless or indifferent about something.
>>
> Darren's IQ is so low he couldn't even pass/complete *high school*.
>
> Nuff said!
>>
>>>> it
>>>
>>> Your lies are *vague*. When you are asked for specifics, like proof
>>> of your claims, you run, run, run.
>>>
>>>> sits on 3100rpm at freeway speeds thanks to the useless gearing and
>>>> it drinks fuel like a Battalion of German tanks moving at high speed.
>>>
>>> It has *truck gearing*, what on earth would you expect it to do at
>>> *freeway speeds* FFS? That ratio gives extra torque multiplication
>>> which helps with *acceleration under load* but, that's right, you
>>> don't understand those concepts, do you? Requires maths!
>>>>
>>>> Now, before you say "That gives it character", I agree. It makes it
>>>> fun because it's so fucking archaic, but it *does* get old. The
>>>> wife and I
>>>
>>> Hey Darren, a 50s vintage truck *is* old! Deal with it.
>>>
>>>> were out in it all day today shopping for new kitchen appliances as
>>>> we're renovating our house, and apart from using a tank of fuel I'm
>>>
>>> That'll teach you not to buy the cheapest house build available.
>>>
>>>> absolutely knackered tonight as driving the thing for any length of
>>>> time is hard work.
>>>
>>> Of course it is Darren - hard work for a physical & mental cripple
>>> like you.
>>>>
>>>> Not that I'm complaining as I love the thing, but in my opinion
>>>> there is nothing about it to be lost in making it a better drive.
>>>>
>>>>>    What i`d really like to own tho is a '32 three window coupe, or
>>>>> failing that, a '48 Mercury... Stock of course. :)
>>>>>    None of which is liable to happen now oh well...
>>>>
>>>> I'd have the 32 three window in a heartbeat which would be a rod in
>>>> my case of course, but you can have the Mercury. They were okay,
>>>> but I was never a big wrap for the Merc front bling. I always
>>>> thought it looked a bit garish. A 46 Ford ute I had years ago with
>>>> it's original flatty is
>>>
>>> Your lies and fake claims are a bit *garish*!
>>>
>>>> about as close as I ever came to one.
>>>>
>>>> 1940 Ford pickup is on my bucket list. Hot-rodded of course.
>>>> Something along these lines:
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.seven82motors.com.au/car/1940-ford-pick-up/#.Yzb-TG5BxPA
>>>>
>>>> Shit, if I found one like that I'd even leave the flatty in it,
>>>> even though it'd be almost as slow as Clasener's poverty pack
>>>> Corolla :)
>>>
>>> The 1.8 litre Corollas are capable of 195 kph Darren. They are also
>>> capable of 0-100 in 10.2 seconds. Not bad for a *family sedan*, eh?
>>
>>
>> the Lancer similar 9.5 sec, 200 klmph
>>
> Indeed, more than adequate for a family sedan. Darren's just
> projecting again. He does that a lot.

On 2/10/2022 3:42 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 29/09/2022 11:25 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 28/09/2022 9:54 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>> On 28/9/2022 8:30 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2022 3:17 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>>> On 28/9/2022 2:01 pm, jonz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>   Yes, *Every* time you post/repost yer irrelevant rubbish in
>>>>>> here. Silly fixated fuckwit that you are...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder what he thinks anyone is going to use a truck that's well
>>>>> over 60 yrs old for?
>>>>
>>>> He's a fucking idiot, but then you're talking about a bloke who's
>>>> claim to automotive fame is collecting a yard full of Leyland
>>>> Marina's, which ranks him at the top of the list of no life losers.
>>>> Little wonder that his own wife won't even talk to him, and it's
>>>> incredibly interesting to note that the only person in this group I
>>>> know of who has actually met him in the flesh has gone from being
>>>> one of his biggest supporters to one of his greatest critics
>>>> seemingly as a direct result of that meeting.
>>>>
>>>> I expect that prolly has something to do with the bloke being an
>>>> absolute fucking flog who didn't live up to expectations :)
>>>>
>>>>> No one in their right mind would use it as a work truck, apart
>>>>> from being too valuable it can't compete with a modern work ute
>>>>> for safety, economy and comfort so therefore its main use is
>>>>> showing it off and there is nothing wrong with that at all.
>>>>
>>>> It's a cruiser, and just like any other classic vehicle used used
>>>> for cruising duties there need be no more justification other than
>>>> the desire to do so. However at the end of the day it *is* still a
>>>> ute, and now that I don't have the Navara any more I've been using
>>>> it for a few "ute" type tasks.
>>>>
>>>> I took 300 litres of used oil down to the recycling station in it
>>>> the other day, and last week end I used it to go to the local Mire
>>>> 10 to pick up some timber and a couple of door jambs as we're
>>>> renovating the house.
>>>>
>>>> People got a kick out of seeing it earning it's keep.
>>>>
>>>>> In my experience people like to see interesting vehicles being used.
>>>>
>>>> They do indeed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> When I wash my Porsche on my driveway neighbours that normal just
>>> wave and drive past stop for a chat and want to have a look at the
>>> car, from what I've seen the old F truck gets plenty of attention.
>>>
>>
>> when I wash or park my Lancer... no one takes any notice..
>>
>
> Nobody takes any notice of a budget priced "Porsche" either. It's what
> he likes to believe because wankers like Daz and the fraud crave
> attention.
>
> Even if it's mostly in their own mind.
>

it's a useless car. no room for passengers, or picking up stuff from
Bunnings, etc., probably drinks petrol at a phenomenal rate too.

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

On 29/09/2022 11:50 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 28/09/2022 11:44 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 28/09/2022 7:55 am, Daryl wrote:
>>> On 28/9/2022 1:46 am, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, thank you. I just put some different whitewalls on it. It had
>>>> inch and 3/4 wide whites on it when I bought it, but I've changed to
>>>> 3 inch wide whites which I think suits it better. You can see the
>>>> difference between them in this pic:
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEE0T0R
>>>>
>>>> Now I just have to wait for the hubcaps I like going back into
>>>> production.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> LOL, I don't mind the look of either tyre.
>>
>> I liked the smaller whites when I first got it, but have seen a few
>> pics of trucks in the US with the larger 3 inch wide jobs and think
>> that suits them better. More of a traditional "hot rod" look which is
>> what I like.
>>
>>> Certainly looks much better with those wheels than 22' alloys with
>>> very low profile tyres which I have seen on plenty of older cars
>>> which IMHO looks wrong.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> Like the lovely lady neighbour I have who owns these two classics that
>> I look after for her. They're nice cars, but her wheel choices are
>> totally wrong in my opinion. She likes them though, and that's all
>> that matters.
>>
>>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEE2HVB
>>
>>
>>
>
> totally wrong wheels on that red car
>

Nice car but the wheels are hideous! Just as bad as the awful white wall
tyres on that fugly truck.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 2/10/2022 3:38 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 30/09/2022 5:47 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 29/09/2022 9:24 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2022 7:35 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 29/09/2022 6:58 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 29/09/2022 5:47 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/09/2022 1:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/09/2022 11:10 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 8:07 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 7:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 6:54 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 1:03 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 9:52 am, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/9/2022 8:46 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently the new Ranger has a variable rate charge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system where the amount of charge the battery receives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is variable. Often it's way less than the 13.8v minimum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you'd expect to see on a healthy conventional Alternator
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system, and the battery itself is usually only changed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 75% of it's capacity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another useless "fuel saving" idea that will be getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permanently disabled once the car gets here....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just something else to go wrong with very little if any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel saved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We just don't need this rubbish. It's been around for some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time now and does nothing other than add an extra element
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of unreliability into the mix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you need to, then try the tyre dealer in Grant St
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bacchus near the corner of Main St. He's pretty good. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recently had to replace the battery in the Santa Fe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which crapped itself at not quite 4 years old which was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit shitty. Price for a new replacement was around the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 450 mark at most places, but he supplied a new Bosch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> battery for 230 bucks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll keep them in mind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're nice people, and pretty decent on their tyre
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prices as well. They shit all over the local Bridgestone
>>>>>>>>>>>>> outlet. Especially when it comes to tractor tyres.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if Jerky Birko ever managed to get the courage to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> call them for the "full story" like he said he was gunna :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't need to, I already know you're a compulsive liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>> However, remind us of why you balked at phoning Xeno's
>>>>>>>>>>>> mate, you know the one you claimed didn't exist?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh that's right, you're not only a hypocritical habitual
>>>>>>>>>>>> liar and a fraud, you're a coward as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's funny, I just spent a number of days in Holland and 2
>>>>>>>>>>> weeks on a cruise where about 20% of the passengers were Dutch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's "The Netherlands" or "Nederland" or "Kingdom of the
>>>>>>>>>> Netherlands" but not "Holland". Never was but it wasn't
>>>>>>>>>> exactly discouraged in the past but now it is official.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ksby.com/the-netherlands-no-longer-called-holland/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So which province are Amsterdam and Volendam in?
>>>>>>>>> Which province is Rotterdam in?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People don't go around referring to "Australia" as Tasmania or
>>>>>>>> Queensland or any other state or territory do they you daft twit?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   Universally, they
>>>>>>>>>>> were happy, helpful people and easy to get along with,
>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps they just don't do well in the southern hemisphere.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm doing just fine and that description can be applied to me
>>>>>>>>>> just as well. This place isn't real life. Imagine if it was!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately from the only point of view that we have here,
>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence of that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're a dull and dimwitted bore and it isn't just what you
>>>>>>>> post in here to confirm it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> lick, lick, suck, suck.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> burp! fart! snot! extra smelly fart!...
>>>>>
>>>> No more than expected.
>>>
>>>
>>> do you ever get tired of being a childish twat? because you are
>>> certainly tiresome..
>>>
>>>
>> Childish twat? I give you "burp! fart! snot! extra smelly fart!..."
>> The prosecution rests Your Honour
>
> Yes childish twat, the prosecution rested the case at "lick, lick,
> suck, suck.". Evidently you're so dim that you don't even understand
> parody.
>

exactly. poor ol'keefy musta failed hi school english

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

On 2/10/2022 9:42 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 1/10/2022 7:46 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 1/10/2022 12:35 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2022 7:59 pm, jonz wrote:
>>>> On 9/28/2022 10:26 PM, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2022 9:49 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/9/2022 8:30 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In my experience people like to see interesting vehicles being
>>>>>>>> used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They do indeed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've seen another one around similar to yours that I've seen
>>>>>> towing a trailer and appears to be used for work, I haven't had a
>>>>>> chance to have an up close look but IMHO to be used as a daily
>>>>>> work vehicle it would need to have substantial mods such as modern
>>>>>> suspension/steering, brakes and drive line.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is what I plan on doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've got a series III XJ6 Jag here in the back yard which is going
>>>>> to donate it's front and rear ends, brakes and steering for the
>>>>> Effie. Front end, brakes and steering are definite as they're a
>>>>> perfect into these old tubs which gives them a massive upgrade in
>>>>> one go of independent suspension, 4 pot front brakes with decent
>>>>> sized rotors and power assisted rack & pinion which it desperately
>>>>> needs over it's current standard "Armstrong" steering system.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Jag rear is set as the preferred option in the interests of not
>>>>> only keeping it all Jag/Chev bolt pattern, but to have the inboard
>>>>> rear discs and independent rear which would give it an excellent
>>>>> steering, brakes and handling package. Those big old cats had
>>>>> shitty engines and hopeless electrics, but they stopped, steered
>>>>> and handled pretty well for an 1800kg "sports" car :)
>>>>>
>>>>> The downside to the Jag rear is that you have to take them out of
>>>>> the factory cradle to mount them into the narrow chassis, and once
>>>>> you do that it starts to get complicated with regards to soft
>>>>> mounting, radius rods and exhausts. It's certainly doable, but it's
>>>>> not a 5 minute job. If it proves to be too much of a headache then
>>>>> plan B is a Ford 8 inch on a triangulated 4 link with coil overs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Engine wise the old Y block will be getting sold off to a local
>>>>> bloke who has a Customline who is looking for a good running engine
>>>>> and in it's place will be an AU XR8 220kW 5 litre roller cam engine
>>>>> and a Chev 700R4 with a home made adapter. Not sure if I'll go
>>>>> injector or carb yet. I have a decent small windsor carb and
>>>>> manifold combo here that would work very well on it, but I'm
>>>>> interested in the Holley Sniper idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll see how it pans out....
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>>   Well, I know what your reply will/would be. :).
>>>
>>> Along the lines of what I've already said really :)
>>
>> Methinks there was a hint of scepticism there. Talk is cheap and, in
>> your case, sure to be lies and bullshit. You have form!
>>>
>>>>      But, if that were mine, *Everything* would be original, or NOS
>>>> as far as possible.
>>>
>>> I don't disagree with that sentiment, but to me it depends on the
>>> vehicle.
>>>
>>> Some vehicles deserve to be preserved in their original condition
>>> because they are simply far too special to be made into anything
>>> else. Some of the real classics, such as any wire wheel equipped
>>> front engined Ferrari. A D type Jaguar. A Mercedes 300SL Gullwing. A
>>> GTHO Falcon. A Boss 429 Mustang. Etc, ad infinitum. I have a love of
>>> all kinds of classic cars and I visit as many shows as I can to see
>>> as many of them in the flesh as possible, and I get a great kick out
>>> of seeing some of the real rarities.
>>>
>>> When was the last time you saw an original Tucker "Torpedo" in the
>>> flesh?
>>
>> Ahem Darren, no one has ever seen a *vehicle* "in the flesh". I hate
>> to break it to you but cars are made of metal, mostly. Made of a fair
>> chunk of plastic these days too but, assuredly, *no flesh*.
>
>
> just a point of order, 'in the flesh' means 'in person', so bodily present
>
>
>>>
>>>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEEA7Y6
>>>
>>>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEEA7Y5
>>>
>>> A pretty impressive machine, and it was a real treat to get to see
>>> such an automotive oddity up close and personal.
>>
>> Yep, two of life's failures side by side, that'd be a treat to see.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, I *also* believe that some vehicles are prime
>>> candidates for modification as it helps to make them more a enjoyable
>>> experience, and early F-100's are such a vehicle in my opinion. Don't
>>> get me wrong, as I can appreciate one that's been restored to
>>> original spec, and in fact there is a guy who lives about 10 minutes
>>> from me in a place called Hopetoun Park who has a really nice '55
>>> that he's restored down to the last nut, bolt and screw.
>>>
>>> But he *also* has a modified '56 which has been kept looking mostly
>>> original but with relatively modern mechanicals because, as he said,
>>> "They drive like shit, and sometimes it's nice to cruise around in
>>> something that looks the part but isn't hard work to operate".
>>>
>>> And on that point I concur.
>>
>> Of course you would! A truck is a truck is a truck. They are intended
>> to carry *loads*. That's what that tub in the arse end is for. It was
>> never intended to be what you intend to use it for, a *poseur*
>> vehicle. Darren, the word "poseur" is *100% perfect* when referring to
>> you.
>>
>> poseur: noun
>> a person who behaves affectedly in order to impress others.
>>
>> It applies to a person who is, in short, a liar, a cheat, or is simply
>> *delusional*. Perfect fit for you, eh laddie?
>>>
>>> I'm not into radical customisations, as I'm too old for that rubbish
>>> these days. But I like "Resto-mods", which is the art of taking a
>>
>> Too crippled you mean.
>>
>>> classic car or truck and basically keeping it looking fairly original
>>> but updating the mechanicals to make it a far more practical and
>>> useful vehicle. And the creature comforts as well, with things like
>>> power steering, air conditioning, power windows, better seats, etc.
>>>
>>> My Effie is relatively standard, with only a small handful of
>>> modifications. It has a disc brake upgrade and a C4 auto. It still
>>> has it's original 272 Y block V8, but with a 4 barrel carb, arfet
>>> market intake manifold and a nice set of headers. The engine is
>>> otherwise completely stock. It still has it's leaf sprung front beam
>>> axle, it's leaf sprung Dana 44 diff with appallingly useless 3.92:1
>>> gearing, it's woeful 27:1 ratio manual steering box and it's under
>>> floor mounted master cylinder with a "tree stump" type brake pedal
>>> that pokes up at you through the floor :)
>>>
>>> And as a result of all that, it drives like shit :)
>>
>> It is a *truck* of *fifties* vintage! What the hell do you *expect* it
>> to drive like? Do you have *any inkling* at all of the technological
>> development that commenced in *vehicular design* in the 70s and then
>> ramped up significantly during the 90s. I recall being taken through
>> the GMH Development Labs in the 80s and they had some serious computer
>> hardware - just for testing - even in those early days. Cars of the
>> 50s are archaic in comparison, trucks of the 50s even more so. But
>> then, the people who drove them back in the 50s weren't a bunch of
>> *poseurs* like you.
>>>
>>> It wanders all over the road, it doesn't stop well and it's difficult to
>
>
> if the damn thing is this unsafe all the more reason to fit proper seat
> belts
>

On 2/10/2022 2:38 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 30/09/2022 5:47 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 29/09/2022 9:24 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2022 7:35 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 29/09/2022 6:58 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 29/09/2022 5:47 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/09/2022 1:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/09/2022 11:10 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 8:07 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 7:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 6:54 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 1:03 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 9:52 am, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/9/2022 8:46 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently the new Ranger has a variable rate charge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system where the amount of charge the battery receives is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> variable. Often it's way less than the 13.8v minimum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you'd expect to see on a healthy conventional Alternator
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system, and the battery itself is usually only changed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 75% of it's capacity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another useless "fuel saving" idea that will be getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permanently disabled once the car gets here....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just something else to go wrong with very little if any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel saved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We just don't need this rubbish. It's been around for some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time now and does nothing other than add an extra element
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of unreliability into the mix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you need to, then try the tyre dealer in Grant St
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bacchus near the corner of Main St. He's pretty good. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recently had to replace the battery in the Santa Fe which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crapped itself at not quite 4 years old which was a bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shitty. Price for a new replacement was around the 450
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mark at most places, but he supplied a new Bosch battery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 230 bucks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll keep them in mind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're nice people, and pretty decent on their tyre prices
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as well. They shit all over the local Bridgestone outlet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Especially when it comes to tractor tyres.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if Jerky Birko ever managed to get the courage to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> call them for the "full story" like he said he was gunna :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't need to, I already know you're a compulsive liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>> However, remind us of why you balked at phoning Xeno's mate,
>>>>>>>>>>>> you know the one you claimed didn't exist?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh that's right, you're not only a hypocritical habitual
>>>>>>>>>>>> liar and a fraud, you're a coward as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's funny, I just spent a number of days in Holland and 2
>>>>>>>>>>> weeks on a cruise where about 20% of the passengers were Dutch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's "The Netherlands" or "Nederland" or "Kingdom of the
>>>>>>>>>> Netherlands" but not "Holland". Never was but it wasn't
>>>>>>>>>> exactly discouraged in the past but now it is official.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ksby.com/the-netherlands-no-longer-called-holland/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So which province are Amsterdam and Volendam in?
>>>>>>>>> Which province is Rotterdam in?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People don't go around referring to "Australia" as Tasmania or
>>>>>>>> Queensland or any other state or territory do they you daft twit?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   Universally, they
>>>>>>>>>>> were happy, helpful people and easy to get along with,
>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps they just don't do well in the southern hemisphere.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm doing just fine and that description can be applied to me
>>>>>>>>>> just as well. This place isn't real life. Imagine if it was!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately from the only point of view that we have here,
>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence of that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're a dull and dimwitted bore and it isn't just what you post
>>>>>>>> in here to confirm it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> lick, lick, suck, suck.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> burp! fart! snot! extra smelly fart!...
>>>>>
>>>> No more than expected.
>>>
>>>
>>> do you ever get tired of being a childish twat? because you are
>>> certainly tiresome..
>>>
>>>
>> Childish twat? I give you "burp! fart! snot! extra smelly fart!..."
>> The prosecution rests Your Honour
>
> Yes childish twat, the prosecution rested the case at "lick, lick, suck,
> suck.". Evidently you're so dim that you don't even understand parody.
>
Old misery guts to the rescue. Apparently you don't understand it either.

On 2/10/2022 11:17 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 30/09/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/09/2022 6:20 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2022 5:50 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote in news:jpnfuoF64olU1
>>>> @mid.individual.net:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> QED, thanks for proving my point.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any time now felix will piss in your pocket and feed your ego.
>>>>>
>>>>> "The team" 2 old farts who think that saying the same thing multiple
>>>>> times a day achieves something.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 over ego'ed troll
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 Sycophant
>>>> That's genuinely remarkable keith.
>>>>
>>>> *Every single statement* you've made in that brain-wrenching miasma is
>>>> wrong. All of them factually, and some in English as well! "over
>>>> ego'ed"!!! Gak! That's worse than "beer-oh".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> putting on my Freudian hat for a moment, I'm thinking maybe keefy
>>> zero is not content with his life, so he resents those who are
>>
>> My God! Resent who you are? That's the funniest thing that you've said
>> all year.
>
> Most likely true. Have you laughed this year, bore?
>
Constantly at you and the other members of the misery quartet.

On 1/10/2022 6:56 am, alvey wrote:
> Noddy <me@home.com> wrote in news:th6rs1$112dq$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 30/09/2022 7:46 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2022 7:25 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>>> Jesus keith, no wonder you're the death of every party... you're
>>>> soooooo boring!
>>>
>>> Says the guy who has been posting the same old thing several times a
>>> day for years. The irony is astounding.
>>
>> I would have thought that the death of every party would be the
>> cockspank who has to take his Ipad along with him as everyone else
>> detests the cunt of a thing that much that no one will talk to him.
>> Not even his wife :)
>>
>> But that's another story.
>>
>> There is some level of irony all round here Keith, and part of it is
>> in the form of you in repeatedly offering up these backhanded quips to
>> the very people you criticise for their inane repititous bullshit :)
>>
>> You need to appreciate that you are arguing with people who are
>> incapable of anything *remotely* approaching logic and who never play
>> on a field with fixed goal posts, and as a result you can *never* win.
>> In fact all you do by commenting is feed them the oxygen they need to
>> keep going. The *only* way you can beat them is to block or ignore
>> them and deny them the very thing they exist here for, which is to be
>> attention whores.
>>
>> Of course, if pulling their chains amuses you then knock yourself out,
>> but you look just as stupid as they do in doing the same thing over
>> and over.
>
> Well if keith isn't going to respond to this steaming pile of Fraudster
> poo (yet again), neither am I.

That's my good deed for the day.

On 4/10/2022 7:05 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 1/10/2022 6:56 am, alvey wrote:

>> Well if keith isn't going to respond to this steaming pile of Fraudster
>> poo (yet again), neither am I.
>
> That's my good deed for the day.

Lol :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 4/10/2022 7:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 4/10/2022 7:05 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 1/10/2022 6:56 am, alvey wrote:
>
>>> Well if keith isn't going to respond to this steaming pile of Fraudster
>>> poo (yet again), neither am I.
>>
>> That's my good deed for the day.
>
> Lol :)
>
Aw Darren, you've gone and spoiled the day! The lies and bullshit are
hiding behind you ready to spring out and assail aus.cars!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote in
news:jq27joFraspU2@mid.individual.net:

> On 2/10/2022 11:17 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 30/09/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2022 6:20 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 30/09/2022 5:50 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>> keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote in news:jpnfuoF64olU1
>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> QED, thanks for proving my point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any time now felix will piss in your pocket and feed your ego.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The team" 2 old farts who think that saying the same thing
>>>>>> multiple times a day achieves something.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 over ego'ed troll
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 Sycophant
>>>>> That's genuinely remarkable keith.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Every single statement* you've made in that brain-wrenching
>>>>> miasma is wrong. All of them factually, and some in English as
>>>>> well! "over ego'ed"!!! Gak! That's worse than "beer-oh".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> putting on my Freudian hat for a moment, I'm thinking maybe keefy
>>>> zero is not content with his life, so he resents those who are
>>>
>>> My God! Resent who you are? That's the funniest thing that you've
>>> said all year.
>>
>> Most likely true. Have you laughed this year, bore?
>>
> Constantly at you and the other members of the misery quartet.

Anddd there's another trait you have in common with The Fraudster. Using
ludicrously inappropriate words. ie. Would you care to explain how
highlighting the Fraudsters' lies, cowardice and hypocrisy equates to
making me a "misery"?

alvey

keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote in news:jq27qaFraspU3
@mid.individual.net:

> On 1/10/2022 6:56 am, alvey wrote:

>>
>> Well if keith isn't going to respond to this steaming pile of Fraudster
>> poo (yet again), neither am I.
>
> That's my good deed for the day.

Increase your popularity! Do more!

alvey

On 5/10/2022 4:36 am, alvey wrote:
> keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote in
> news:jq27joFraspU2@mid.individual.net:
>
>> On 2/10/2022 11:17 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 30/09/2022 6:20 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 30/09/2022 5:50 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote in news:jpnfuoF64olU1
>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> QED, thanks for proving my point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any time now felix will piss in your pocket and feed your ego.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "The team" 2 old farts who think that saying the same thing
>>>>>>> multiple times a day achieves something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1 over ego'ed troll
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1 Sycophant
>>>>>> That's genuinely remarkable keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Every single statement* you've made in that brain-wrenching
>>>>>> miasma is wrong. All of them factually, and some in English as
>>>>>> well! "over ego'ed"!!! Gak! That's worse than "beer-oh".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> putting on my Freudian hat for a moment, I'm thinking maybe keefy
>>>>> zero is not content with his life, so he resents those who are
>>>>
>>>> My God! Resent who you are? That's the funniest thing that you've
>>>> said all year.
>>>
>>> Most likely true. Have you laughed this year, bore?
>>>
>> Constantly at you and the other members of the misery quartet.
>
> Anddd there's another trait you have in common with The Fraudster. Using
> ludicrously inappropriate words. ie. Would you care to explain how
> highlighting the Fraudsters' lies, cowardice and hypocrisy equates to
> making me a "misery"?
>
>
> alvey
>
>

I'm not sure how 'death of every party' keith can claim that he can both
be laughing constantly yet claiming that something which is most likely
factual is the funniest thing he has hear all year.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

Clocky wrote:
> On 5/10/2022 4:36 am, alvey wrote:
>> keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote in
>> news:jq27joFraspU2@mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> On 2/10/2022 11:17 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 30/09/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 30/09/2022 6:20 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 30/09/2022 5:50 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote in news:jpnfuoF64olU1
>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> QED, thanks for proving my point.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any time now felix will piss in your pocket and feed your ego.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "The team" 2 old farts who think that saying the same thing
>>>>>>>> multiple times a day achieves something.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1 over ego'ed troll
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1 Sycophant
>>>>>>> That's genuinely remarkable keith.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Every single statement* you've made in that brain-wrenching
>>>>>>> miasma is wrong. All of them factually, and some in English as
>>>>>>> well! "over ego'ed"!!! Gak! That's worse than "beer-oh".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> putting on my Freudian hat for a moment, I'm thinking maybe keefy
>>>>>> zero is not content with his life, so he resents those who are
>>>>>
>>>>> My God! Resent who you are? That's the funniest thing that you've
>>>>> said all year.
>>>>
>>>> Most likely true. Have you laughed this year, bore?
>>>>
>>> Constantly at you and the other members of the misery quartet.
>>
>> Anddd there's another trait you have in common with The Fraudster. Using
>> ludicrously inappropriate words. ie. Would you care to explain how
>> highlighting the Fraudsters' lies, cowardice and hypocrisy equates to
>> making me a "misery"?
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>>
>
> I'm not sure how 'death of every party' keith can claim that he can
> both be laughing constantly yet claiming that something which is most
> likely factual is the funniest thing he has hear all year.
>
>

but keefy.zero is a strange person. (not normal)

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

On 4/10/2022 4:00 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 2/10/2022 2:38 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 30/09/2022 5:47 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2022 9:24 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 29/09/2022 7:35 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 29/09/2022 6:58 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/09/2022 5:47 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/09/2022 1:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 29/09/2022 11:10 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 8:07 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 7:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2022 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 6:54 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 1:03 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/09/2022 9:52 am, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/9/2022 8:46 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently the new Ranger has a variable rate charge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system where the amount of charge the battery receives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is variable. Often it's way less than the 13.8v minimum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you'd expect to see on a healthy conventional Alternator
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system, and the battery itself is usually only changed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 75% of it's capacity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another useless "fuel saving" idea that will be getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permanently disabled once the car gets here....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just something else to go wrong with very little if any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel saved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We just don't need this rubbish. It's been around for some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time now and does nothing other than add an extra element
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of unreliability into the mix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you need to, then try the tyre dealer in Grant St
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bacchus near the corner of Main St. He's pretty good. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recently had to replace the battery in the Santa Fe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which crapped itself at not quite 4 years old which was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit shitty. Price for a new replacement was around the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 450 mark at most places, but he supplied a new Bosch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> battery for 230 bucks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll keep them in mind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're nice people, and pretty decent on their tyre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prices as well. They shit all over the local Bridgestone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outlet. Especially when it comes to tractor tyres.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if Jerky Birko ever managed to get the courage to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call them for the "full story" like he said he was gunna :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't need to, I already know you're a compulsive liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, remind us of why you balked at phoning Xeno's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mate, you know the one you claimed didn't exist?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh that's right, you're not only a hypocritical habitual
>>>>>>>>>>>>> liar and a fraud, you're a coward as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's funny, I just spent a number of days in Holland and 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks on a cruise where about 20% of the passengers were Dutch.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's "The Netherlands" or "Nederland" or "Kingdom of the
>>>>>>>>>>> Netherlands" but not "Holland". Never was but it wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>> exactly discouraged in the past but now it is official.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ksby.com/the-netherlands-no-longer-called-holland/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So which province are Amsterdam and Volendam in?
>>>>>>>>>> Which province is Rotterdam in?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> People don't go around referring to "Australia" as Tasmania or
>>>>>>>>> Queensland or any other state or territory do they you daft twit?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>   Universally, they
>>>>>>>>>>>> were happy, helpful people and easy to get along with,
>>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps they just don't do well in the southern hemisphere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm doing just fine and that description can be applied to me
>>>>>>>>>>> just as well. This place isn't real life. Imagine if it was!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately from the only point of view that we have here,
>>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence of that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're a dull and dimwitted bore and it isn't just what you
>>>>>>>>> post in here to confirm it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lick, lick, suck, suck.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> burp! fart! snot! extra smelly fart!...
>>>>>>
>>>>> No more than expected.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> do you ever get tired of being a childish twat? because you are
>>>> certainly tiresome..
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Childish twat? I give you "burp! fart! snot! extra smelly fart!..."
>>> The prosecution rests Your Honour
>>
>> Yes childish twat, the prosecution rested the case at "lick, lick,
>> suck, suck.". Evidently you're so dim that you don't even understand
>> parody.
>>
> Old misery guts to the rescue. Apparently you don't understand it either.

I obviously understand it just fine, bore.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."