On Sat, 08 May 2021 10:11:02 +1000, jonz scribed:

> On 5/8/2021 6:39 AM, Dechucka wrote:
>> On 7/05/2021 11:28 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 22:41:13 +1000, Max scribed:
>>>
>>>> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-
>>> for-
>>>>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years
>>>>>>>>>>> and nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at
>>>>>>>>>>> least.
>>>>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where
>>>>>>>>>>> you have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed
>>>>>>>>>> manifestly excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is)
>>>>>>>>>> won't be sufficient.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>>>>> .......................
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The
>>>>>>> jury decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the
>>>>>> poast alone you old fool!....
>>>>>
>>>>> roast perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence. Just like
>>>> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
>>>> totally exonerated.
>>>
>>> He is not totally exonerated. The stench will always e there.
>>>
>> Hayne is a convicted criminal but this may change in the future
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>  As it should!

It won't undo what happened over seas.

On 07-May-21 4:06 pm, Dechucka wrote:
> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-sexual-assault/100120002
>>>
>>>
>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>> nine months in jail.
>>>
>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.
>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you have
>>> more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>
>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be sufficient.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
>
> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?

Few people get the maximum sentence. One would have to look at sentences
given to other people. Of course, one has to care enough to make the effort.

Sylvia.

"Phil Allison" <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f8ff24b2-f42d-4f32-be71-ac08f36949c5n@googlegroups.com...
> Max the Psycho Troll wrote:
> =====================
>>>
>> >>> " I'm basically here to stir things up and create entertainment for
>> >>> myself."
>> >>>
>> >> What's wrong with that? It's a free and open newsgroup.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > ** Trolling is not allowed on ANY newsgroup.
>> > Trolling DESTROYS newsgrups.
>> >
>> > Your comment is the very definition of trolling.
>> >
>> > FOAD you wog idiot.
>> >
>> Luckily for this newsgroup you do not dictate how people post here.
>
> Newsgroups are self policing, unless "moderated".

That why we kicked you out.

> The usual usenet rules

No such animal.

> need to be observed.

Mindless bullshit.

> Anyone intent on * malicious trolling *
> is gonna get their arse kicked hard.

Yep, that why you cant sit down anymore.

>> You do not and will never have that power.

> You have *no idea* how much power
> one person can bring to bear.

Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed drunken
completely unemployable dole bludger fantasys.

"Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message news:s74nt1$177j$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 8/05/2021 10:20 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message
>> news:s74h7v$18qe$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> On 8/05/2021 4:57 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message
>>>> news:s73ch7$1ohc$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>>>> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
>>>>>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at
>>>>>>>>>>>> least.
>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed
>>>>>>>>>>> manifestly
>>>>>>>>>>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be
>>>>>>>>>>> sufficient.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>>>>>> .......................
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The
>>>>>>>> jury
>>>>>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad. This time Leave the poast
>>>>>>> alone you old fool!....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> roast perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>
>>>>> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence. Just like
>>>>> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
>>>>> totally exonerated.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, we know he did it. And so does he.
>>>
>>> Are you saying he exposed his genitals while in full garb in the
>>> sacristy
>>
>> Yep.
>>
>>> where there were bound to be people coming and going?

There arent actually because that’s where the priest
and the altar boys are dressing up and in the case
of the altar boy, being fucked up the arse.

>> Yep. We know he did that at the pool in sydney too and
>> was told by an adult there to behave himself or else.

> A bit different at a pool changerooms where it is expected that you would
> get naked to change clothes etc.

He was doing much more than that, stark naked and harassing kids.

> He might have been a bit a of wierdo in those settings

He was in fact a child molester. In the pool with kids too.

> and maybe even alleged low range offender,

Nothing low range about it.

> but he is not guilty of the serious offences he was aquitted of.

Corse he is, whatever the High Court claimed.

>>> Does that sound believable? The High Court thought it wasn't.
>>
>> That’s not what the High Court thought.
>
> The High Court talked about the impossibility and extreme unlikelyhood of
> the offences taking place as described by the complainant.

Bullshit it did.

snip

>>>> He is not totally exonerated. The stench will always e there.
>>>>
>>> Hayne is a convicted criminal but this may change in the future
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>  As it should!
>
> It won't undo what happened over seas.
>
No criminal conviction

Rod Raving Lunatic Ex Cop Speed wrote:
============================>>
> >>> Are you saying he exposed his genitals while in full garb in the
> >>> sacristy
> >>
> >> Yep.
> >>
> >>> where there were bound to be people coming and going?
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------
> There arent actually because that’s where the priest
> and the altar boys are dressing up and in the case
> of the altar boy, being fucked up the arse.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

** How odd that was never claimed by anyone the time of his trial ?

Of course, the Rodbot Ex cop was actually there and watched it all happen.
Must have a H.G. Wells time machine to do that sort of stuff with.

Explains how he knows more than anyone else.

Pig's arse....

....... Phil

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote

>>>>> Are you saying he exposed his genitals
>>>>> while in full garb in the sacristy

>>>> Yep.

Because that what the kid said.

>>>>> where there were bound to be people coming and going?

>> There arent actually because that’s where the priest
>> and the altar boys are dressing up and in the case
>> of the altar boy, being fucked up the arse.

> How odd that was never claimed by anyone the time of his trial ?

That was a joke, you stupid drug crazed drunken
completely unemployable dole bludging fuckwit.