On Sunday, 29 August 2021 at 12:33:17 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
> On 29/08/2021 02:53 am, Mike Collins wrote:
> > On Sunday, 29 August 2021 at 01:23:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
> >> On 29/08/2021 12:06 am, TMS320 wrote:
> >>> On 28/08/2021 12:33, JNugent wrote:
> >>>> On 28/08/2021 11:54 am, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Saturday, August 28, 2021 at 10:40:11 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> ...with the fundamental difference that when drivers kill they only get
> >>>>>> fined for the dodgy tyres.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And not for killing four people.
> >>>>
> >>>>> A driver of a car which skidded on black ice and ploughed into a
> >>>>> group of cyclists killing four of them, has been fined for having
> >>>>> defective tyres.
> >>>>
> >>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/5241798.stm
> >>>>
> >>>> We all remember the case.
> >>>>
> >>>> If we all recall it correctly, the tyres offence was the only one with
> >>>> which he was charged by the police / CPS and convicted by the court.
> >>>> The authorities will have had their reasons for that.
> >>
> >>> Probably because the jury would be drivers. Just like the jury in a
> >>> trial of a cyclist.
> >> <sigh>
> >>
> >> Juries don't determine which cases come to court or what charges are
> >> brought.
> >>
> >> Don't be silly.
>
> >>>> Who wants to see people punished for offences they have not committed?
> >>>> Other than you, I mean.
> >
> > But the reason Causing Death by Dangerous Driving law was introduced was because juries were unwilling to convict a motorist of Manslaughter or Murder, it is 'only a driving offence' and cyclists 'don't pay road tax'.
> Does that mean that people must be punished for offences they have not
> committed and with which they have not even been charged?
>
> Think carefully (if you are capable of that) before answering. Try not
> to make yourself look even sillier than usual.

I am sure in Nugentworld causing death by dangerous driving is not an offence because the Prime Directive of Nugentworld is "Motorists can do no wrong"

On 30/08/21 04:59, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:11:22 +0100, swldx...@gmail.com
> <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, August 28, 2021 at 4:01:40 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:35:06 +0100, swldx...@gmail.com
>>> <swldx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 5:10:55 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey
>>> wrote:
>>> >> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 19:59:41 +0100, swldx...@gmail.com
>>> <swldx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > On Sunday, August 22, 2021 at 4:44:39 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> > How can you expect a tyre or lamp to last from MOT to MOT? Or
>>> screenwash lasting a year?
>>> >> >> I only change a tyre if:
>>> >> >> It fails the MOT
>>> >> >
>>> >> > My car just failed the MOT on one tyre - so I have replaced all
>>> four with Goodyear Efficient Grip tyres as the original ones are all
>>> different cheapo makes. Tyres on the Drive are going to the MOT
>>> centre to fit them on Saturday.
>>> >> So you have just admitted to illegally driving your car with one
>>> defective tyre. Are you going to report yourself to the police?
>>> >
>>> > I don't know why it failed - he didn't say.
>>> He wanted some money and hadn't found a genuine fault. It's very
>>> interesting if you take your car to two or more MOT centres, you can
>>> get completely different faults. It's as though they don't actually
>>> look at the car and just make shit up....
>>
>> They didn't get any money - they don't fit tyres, so I got Tyres on
>> the Drive to fit a new set of four tyres at the garage and then it
>> passed.
>
> But you only needed one.

That says more about you than them. They are entitled to share their views.

Crap licker

On 30/08/21 06:37, Peeler wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 10:08:04 -0700 (PDT), swldx...@gmail.com, an absolutely
> brain dread troll-feeding senile asshole and typical demented Google groper
> blathered yet again:
>
>> Two more were advisory - in fact they were cheapo makes and all four were
>> different models so I replaced the lot with Goodyears.
>
> Hard to tell which of the two of you is the bigger idiot, you off topic
> troll-feeding senile swine!
>
That says more about you than them. They are entitled to share their views.

shaft splurt

On 30/08/2021 10:00 am, Mike Collins wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 August 2021 at 12:33:17 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
>> On 29/08/2021 02:53 am, Mike Collins wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 29 August 2021 at 01:23:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
>>>> On 29/08/2021 12:06 am, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>> On 28/08/2021 12:33, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/08/2021 11:54 am, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, August 28, 2021 at 10:40:11 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...with the fundamental difference that when drivers kill they only get
>>>>>>>> fined for the dodgy tyres.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And not for killing four people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A driver of a car which skidded on black ice and ploughed into a
>>>>>>> group of cyclists killing four of them, has been fined for having
>>>>>>> defective tyres.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/5241798.stm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We all remember the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we all recall it correctly, the tyres offence was the only one with
>>>>>> which he was charged by the police / CPS and convicted by the court.
>>>>>> The authorities will have had their reasons for that.
>>>>
>>>>> Probably because the jury would be drivers. Just like the jury in a
>>>>> trial of a cyclist.
>>>> <sigh>
>>>>
>>>> Juries don't determine which cases come to court or what charges are
>>>> brought.
>>>>
>>>> Don't be silly.
>>
>>>>>> Who wants to see people punished for offences they have not committed?
>>>>>> Other than you, I mean.
>>>
>>> But the reason Causing Death by Dangerous Driving law was introduced was because juries were unwilling to convict a motorist of Manslaughter or Murder, it is 'only a driving offence' and cyclists 'don't pay road tax'.
>> Does that mean that people must be punished for offences they have not
>> committed and with which they have not even been charged?
>>
>> Think carefully (if you are capable of that) before answering. Try not
>> to make yourself look even sillier than usual.
>
> I am sure in Nugentworld causing death by dangerous driving is not an offence because the Prime Directive of Nugentworld is "Motorists can do no wrong"

Stop being stupid (a tall order, I know).

Answer the question (it really ISN'T difficult).

The question is: "[Should] people ... be punished for offences they
have not committed and with which they have not even been charged?"

There are only three possible answers:

(a) Yes (that's probably the one you'd prefer to choose if you didn't
already know much much more stupid it would make you look),

(b) No (the correct answer, which, by definition, you cannot choose), and

(c) I don't know (which may even have a ring of truth in it, when it's
you attempting an answer).

Which is it?

On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 18:08:04 +0100, swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 5:59:37 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>
>> > They didn't get any money - they don't fit tyres, so I got Tyres on the Drive to fit a new set of four tyres at the garage and then it passed.
>> But you only needed one.
>
> Two more were advisory

You do realise you can ignore that page?

> - in fact they were cheapo makes and all four were different models so I replaced the lot with Goodyears.

I thought someone like you would carefully match at least the tyres on the same axles.

On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 21:27:56 +0100, colwyn <guddiesx@btinternet.invalid> wrote:

> On 29/08/2021 12:33, JNugent wrote:
>> On 29/08/2021 02:53 am, Mike Collins wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 29 August 2021 at 01:23:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
>>>> On 29/08/2021 12:06 am, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>> On 28/08/2021 12:33, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/08/2021 11:54 am, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, August 28, 2021 at 10:40:11 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...with the fundamental difference that when drivers kill they
>>>>>>>> only get
>>>>>>>> fined for the dodgy tyres.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And not for killing four people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A driver of a car which skidded on black ice and ploughed into a
>>>>>>> group of cyclists killing four of them, has been fined for having
>>>>>>> defective tyres.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/5241798.stm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We all remember the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we all recall it correctly, the tyres offence was the only one with
>>>>>> which he was charged by the police / CPS and convicted by the court.
>>>>>> The authorities will have had their reasons for that.
>>>>
>>>>> Probably because the jury would be drivers. Just like the jury in a
>>>>> trial of a cyclist.
>>>> <sigh>
>>>>
>>>> Juries don't determine which cases come to court or what charges are
>>>> brought.
>>>>
>>>> Don't be silly.
>>
>>>>>> Who wants to see people punished for offences they have not committed?
>>>>>> Other than you, I mean.
>>>
>>> But the reason Causing Death by Dangerous Driving law was introduced
>>> was because juries were unwilling to convict a motorist of
>>> Manslaughter or Murder, it is 'only a driving offence' and cyclists
>>> 'don't pay road tax'.
>>
>> Does that mean that people must be punished for offences they have not
>> committed and with which they have not even been charged?
>>
>> Think carefully (if you are capable of that) before answering. Try not
>> to make yourself look even sillier than usual.
>
> Obviously, you are not married!

Are you implying the wife commits a crime and you get jailed for it, or she judges you incorrectly? If the latter, that's no reason for the courts to decide matters so hastily.

On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:00:10 +0100, Mike Collins <cmike8828@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sunday, 29 August 2021 at 12:33:17 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
>> On 29/08/2021 02:53 am, Mike Collins wrote:
>> > On Sunday, 29 August 2021 at 01:23:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
>> >> On 29/08/2021 12:06 am, TMS320 wrote:
>> >>> On 28/08/2021 12:33, JNugent wrote:
>> >>>> On 28/08/2021 11:54 am, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Saturday, August 28, 2021 at 10:40:11 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>> ...with the fundamental difference that when drivers kill they only get
>> >>>>>> fined for the dodgy tyres.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> And not for killing four people.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> A driver of a car which skidded on black ice and ploughed into a
>> >>>>> group of cyclists killing four of them, has been fined for having
>> >>>>> defective tyres.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/5241798.stm
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We all remember the case.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If we all recall it correctly, the tyres offence was the only one with
>> >>>> which he was charged by the police / CPS and convicted by the court.
>> >>>> The authorities will have had their reasons for that.
>> >>
>> >>> Probably because the jury would be drivers. Just like the jury in a
>> >>> trial of a cyclist.
>> >> <sigh>
>> >>
>> >> Juries don't determine which cases come to court or what charges are
>> >> brought.
>> >>
>> >> Don't be silly.
>>
>> >>>> Who wants to see people punished for offences they have not committed?
>> >>>> Other than you, I mean.
>> >
>> > But the reason Causing Death by Dangerous Driving law was introduced was because juries were unwilling to convict a motorist of Manslaughter or Murder, it is 'only a driving offence' and cyclists 'don't pay road tax'.
>> Does that mean that people must be punished for offences they have not
>> committed and with which they have not even been charged?
>>
>> Think carefully (if you are capable of that) before answering. Try not
>> to make yourself look even sillier than usual.
>
> I am sure in Nugentworld causing death by dangerous driving is not an offence because the Prime Directive of Nugentworld is "Motorists can do no wrong"

You really need to understand motive, blame, culpability, that sort of thing. If you trip over the flex to my lawnmower, that wasn't my fault.

On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 4:43:57 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 18:08:04 +0100, swldx...@gmail.com <swldx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 5:59:37 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> >
> >> > They didn't get any money - they don't fit tyres, so I got Tyres on the Drive to fit a new set of four tyres at the garage and then it passed.
> >> But you only needed one.
> >
> > Two more were advisory
> You do realise you can ignore that page?
> > - in fact they were cheapo makes and all four were different models so I replaced the lot with Goodyears.
> I thought someone like you would carefully match at least the tyres on the same axles.

I just did - all four, but the cheapo tyres had plenty of meat on them to just throw away until I had to.

On 31/08/21 04:57, Peeler wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 09:19:53 -0700 (PDT), swldx...@gmail.com, an absolutely
> brain dread troll-feeding senile asshole and typical demented Google groper
> blathered yet again:
>
>
>> I just did - all four, but the cheapo tyres had plenty of meat on them to
>> just throw away until I had to.
>
> Nope, it's YOU on all fours and YOU got his meat in your senile gob again,
> you idiotic senile sucker of troll cock!
>
Non sequitur.

Rambling ginger sock slapper

On 31/08/21 01:20, Peeler wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 21:27:38 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>> That says more about you than them. They are entitled to share their views.
>
> Everything about him says that he's a TROLLING ATTENTION WHORE! Everything
> about YOU says that you are a miserable gay masochistic little cyclist,
> fairy cyclist!

What about you?
>
>> Crap licker
>
> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
> cyclist!
>

douche maggot

On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:19:53 +0100, swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 4:43:57 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 18:08:04 +0100, swldx...@gmail.com <swldx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 5:59:37 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> >
>> >> > They didn't get any money - they don't fit tyres, so I got Tyres on the Drive to fit a new set of four tyres at the garage and then it passed.
>> >> But you only needed one.
>> >
>> > Two more were advisory
>> You do realise you can ignore that page?
>> > - in fact they were cheapo makes and all four were different models so I replaced the lot with Goodyears.
>> I thought someone like you would carefully match at least the tyres on the same axles.
>
> I just did - all four, but the cheapo tyres had plenty of meat on them to just throw away until I had to.

Why did you buy the cheap ones in the first place?

On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:19:53 +0100, swldx...@gmail.com <swldx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 4:43:57 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> >> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 18:08:04 +0100, swldx...@gmail.com <swldx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 5:59:37 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > They didn't get any money - they don't fit tyres, so I got Tyres on the Drive to fit a new set of four tyres at the garage and then it passed.
> >> >> But you only needed one.
> >> >
> >> > Two more were advisory
> >> You do realise you can ignore that page?
> >> > - in fact they were cheapo makes and all four were different models so I replaced the lot with Goodyears.
> >> I thought someone like you would carefully match at least the tyres on the same axles.
> >
> > I just did - all four, but the cheapo tyres had plenty of meat on them to just throw away until I had to.
> Why did you buy the cheap ones in the first place?

I bought the car a year ago with them already on.

On 31/08/21 21:26, Peeler wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 21:18:18 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>> Everything about him says that he's a TROLLING ATTENTION WHORE! Everything
>>> about YOU says that you are a miserable gay masochistic little cyclist,
>>> fairy cyclist!
>>
>> What about you?
>
> Everything about me says that I DETEST trolling attention whores and
> miserable gay masochistic little cyclists!

Fair enough.
But they are allowed to post whatever they like.
>
>>>> Crap licker
>>>
>>> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
>>> cyclist!
>>>
>>
>> douche maggot
>
> You STINK of your FAGGOTRY, little fairy cyclist
>

dick bucket

On 31/08/21 21:24, Peeler wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 21:17:23 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>> Nope, it's YOU on all fours and YOU got his meat in your senile gob again,
>>> you idiotic senile sucker of troll cock!
>>>
>> Non sequitur.
>
> There is NO non sequitur to entirely off topic shit, you real dumb fairy
> cyclist!

Yours is not off topic?
>
>> Rambling ginger sock slapper
>
> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
> cyclist!
>

virgin spazz flaps packer

On 1/09/21 05:18, Peeler wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:29:57 -0700 (PDT), swldx...@gmail.com, an absolutely
> brain dread troll-feeding senile asshole and typical demented Google groper
> blathered yet again:
>
>
>>> Why did you buy the cheap ones in the first place?
>>
>> I bought the car a year ago with them already on.
>
> This is a ng about cycling, NOT about cars, you abnormal troll-feeding
> senile idiot!
>
This is not a NG about trolls.

utter fuck herder

On 1/09/21 21:42, Peeler wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 21:29:25 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>>>
>>>> What about you?
>>>
>>> Everything about me says that I DETEST trolling attention whores and
>>> miserable gay masochistic little cyclists!
>>
>> Fair enough.
>> But they are allowed to post whatever they like.
>
> ONLY in your demented gay little mind, fairy cyclist!

You try and stop them.
>
>>>>>> Crap licker
>>>>>
>>>>> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
>>>>> cyclist!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> douche maggot
>>>
>>> You STINK of your FAGGOTRY, little fairy cyclist
>>>
>>
>> dick bucket
>
> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
> cyclist!
>
chesticle balls

On 1/09/21 21:38, Peeler wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 21:30:31 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>
>>> There is NO non sequitur to entirely off topic shit, you real dumb fairy
>>> cyclist!
>>
>> Yours is not off topic?
>
> Indeed! It's HIGHLY on topic, dimwit!

Prove it.
>
>>>> Rambling ginger sock slapper
>>>
>>> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
>>> cyclist!
>>>
>>
>> virgin spazz flaps packer
>
> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
> cyclist!
>
unhuman poop face

On 1/09/21 21:41, Peeler wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 21:31:32 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>>> I bought the car a year ago with them already on.
>>>
>>> This is a ng about cycling, NOT about cars, you abnormal troll-feeding
>>> senile idiot!
>>>
>> This is not a NG about trolls.
>
> As long as trolls are infesting this newsgroups and a few assholes keep
> feeding that troll, it is a newsgroup about trolls, you idiotc little fairy
> cyclist!

So what are you going to do about it? Shouting nonsense is obviously not
working.
>
>> utter fuck herder
>
> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
> cyclist!
>

dried out waffle amputee

On 3/09/21 01:18, Peeler wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 21:27:20 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>> On 1/09/21 21:42, Peeler wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 21:29:25 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
>>> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything about me says that I DETEST trolling attention whores and
>>>>> miserable gay masochistic little cyclists!
>>>>
>>>> Fair enough.
>>>> But they are allowed to post whatever they like.
>>>
>>> ONLY in your demented gay little mind, fairy cyclist!
>>
>> You try and stop them.
>
> Exactly, gay shithead! ...and for as long as the subnormal idiots keep
> playing their game!

You are not succeeding, are you?
>
>>> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
>>> cyclist!
>>>
>> chesticle balls
>
> You STINK of your FAGGOTRY!
>
lard fan

On 3/09/21 01:13, Peeler wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 21:28:02 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>>> Yours is not off topic?
>>>
>>> Indeed! It's HIGHLY on topic, dimwit!
>>
>> Prove it.
>
> I told you already, and I tell you again: NOBODY needs to prove ANYTHING to
> an abysmally stupid and gay little cyclist like you!

No proof.
So I don't believe anything you say.
>
>>>>
>>>> virgin spazz flaps packer
>>>
>>> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
>>> cyclist!
>>>
>> unhuman poop face
>
> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
> cyclist!
>

senile anus bandit wiper

On 3/09/21 01:15, Peeler wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 21:29:24 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>>> This is not a NG about trolls.
>>>
>>> As long as trolls are infesting this newsgroups and a few assholes keep
>>> feeding that troll, it is a newsgroup about trolls, you idiotc little fairy
>>> cyclist!
>>
>> So what are you going to do about it? Shouting nonsense is obviously not
>> working.
>
> There is nothing "nonsense" about pointing out the trolls and the
> troll-feeding senile assholes in this group, filthy fag!

Oh how the daisies smell sweet.
>
>>>> utter fuck herder
>>>
>>> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
>>> cyclist!
>>>
>>
>> dried out waffle amputee
>
> You STINK of your FAGGOTRY, Mr. Peter Keller!
>

shit splurt

On 4/09/21 02:15, Peeler wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 00:02:31 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>>> You try and stop them.
>>>
>>> Exactly, gay shithead! ...and for as long as the subnormal idiots keep
>>> playing their game!
>>
>> You are not succeeding, are you?
>
> In fact you troll-feeding sick assholes KEEP getting exposed for what you
> are! With you additionally being a miserable fag!

The light at the end of the tunnel stole the goods.
>
>>>>> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
>>>>> cyclist!
>>>>>
>>>> chesticle balls
>>>
>>> You STINK of your FAGGOTRY!
>>>
>> lard fan
>
> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
> cyclist!
>

twunting twat piper

On 4/09/21 02:10, Peeler wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 00:03:31 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>> I told you already, and I tell you again: NOBODY needs to prove ANYTHING to
>>> an abysmally stupid and gay little cyclist like you!
>>
>> No proof.
>> So I don't believe anything you say.
>
> Who cares. You ARE an idiot! And a gay one too! <BG>

An old apple does not make any sense.
>
>
>>> Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's ngs, dumb gay little
>>> cyclist!
>>>
>>
>> senile anus bandit wiper
>
> You STINK of your FAGGOTRY, fairy cyclist!

utter puke professor
>

On 4/09/21 02:11, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the resident fairy cyclist's inevitable sick gay shit>
>
The legend of the raven's roar lay down on the riverbed.

lord dictator