On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:19:40 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

>In message <tfsse8$1sop$1@gioia.aioe.org>, at 15:36:40 on Wed, 14 Sep
>2022, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com remarked:
>>On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:46:42 -0000 (UTC)
>>Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>><Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>>> All I can say is he posted a picture of a train carraige and in the window
>>>> was a reflection of an old guy taking the picture just in the spot he should
>>>> be if he was the one taking it. I can't imagine him photoshopping
>>>>some random
>>>
>>>> image out of the many he posts to put some fake person there.
>>>
>>>You obviously don't understand the trick to taking pictures with
>>>reflections of someone other than the photographer. The two very different
>>>people you claim were me were indeed two different real blokes reflected in
>>>the window, but not me, as I always take shots at an oblique angle, then
>>>straighten the frame in post.
>>
>>If you hadn't taken the picture down so damn fast I might even believe that.
>
>If the photo hadn't shown something undesirable, why take it down at
>all, or even if it did: erase the incriminating reflection and re-post.

I don't recall any of that happening. Neil is just making it up.

>
>Meanwhile, the excuses for not sending me a copy are wearing a bit thin.

I wonder which of the two completely different ones he's mentioned he might eventually come up with?

On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:06:18 +0100
Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:19:40 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
>
>>In message <tfsse8$1sop$1@gioia.aioe.org>, at 15:36:40 on Wed, 14 Sep
>>2022, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com remarked:
>>>On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:46:42 -0000 (UTC)
>>>Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>><Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>>>> All I can say is he posted a picture of a train carraige and in the window
>
>>>>> was a reflection of an old guy taking the picture just in the spot he
>should
>>>>> be if he was the one taking it. I can't imagine him photoshopping
>>>>>some random
>>>>
>>>>> image out of the many he posts to put some fake person there.
>>>>
>>>>You obviously don't understand the trick to taking pictures with
>>>>reflections of someone other than the photographer. The two very different
>>>>people you claim were me were indeed two different real blokes reflected in
>>>>the window, but not me, as I always take shots at an oblique angle, then
>>>>straighten the frame in post.
>>>
>>>If you hadn't taken the picture down so damn fast I might even believe that.
>>
>>If the photo hadn't shown something undesirable, why take it down at
>>all, or even if it did: erase the incriminating reflection and re-post.
>
>I don't recall any of that happening. Neil is just making it up.
>
>>
>>Meanwhile, the excuses for not sending me a copy are wearing a bit thin.
>
>I wonder which of the two completely different ones he's mentioned he might
>eventually come up with?

Roland seems to think I owe him some favour. I can't be fucking arsed to set
up some email account to send him a picture. He wasn't interested at the time
when we argued about it for about a week then so I've no idea why he's suddenly
so interested now other than you've wound him up even more recently.

On 15/09/2022 14:43, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:06:18 +0100
> Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:19:40 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> In message <tfsse8$1sop$1@gioia.aioe.org>, at 15:36:40 on Wed, 14 Sep
>>> 2022, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com remarked:
>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:46:42 -0000 (UTC)
>>>> Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>>>>> All I can say is he posted a picture of a train carraige and in the window
>>
>>>>>> was a reflection of an old guy taking the picture just in the spot he
>> should
>>>>>> be if he was the one taking it. I can't imagine him photoshopping
>>>>>> some random
>>>>>
>>>>>> image out of the many he posts to put some fake person there.
>>>>>
>>>>> You obviously don't understand the trick to taking pictures with
>>>>> reflections of someone other than the photographer. The two very different
>>>>> people you claim were me were indeed two different real blokes reflected in
>>>>> the window, but not me, as I always take shots at an oblique angle, then
>>>>> straighten the frame in post.
>>>>
>>>> If you hadn't taken the picture down so damn fast I might even believe that.
>>>
>>> If the photo hadn't shown something undesirable, why take it down at
>>> all, or even if it did: erase the incriminating reflection and re-post.
>>
>> I don't recall any of that happening. Neil is just making it up.
>>
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, the excuses for not sending me a copy are wearing a bit thin.
>>
>> I wonder which of the two completely different ones he's mentioned he might
>> eventually come up with?
>
> Roland seems to think I owe him some favour. I can't be fucking arsed to set
> up some email account to send him a picture. He wasn't interested at the time
> when we argued about it for about a week then so I've no idea why he's suddenly
> so interested now other than you've wound him up even more recently.

If a fuzzy outdated image that probably isn't me fell into the hands of
someone who couldn't be bothered to distribute it, I know I'd be quaking
in my boots.