I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and they tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with them anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I checked on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going on?

On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 5:56:49 PM UTC, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and they tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with them anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I checked on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going on?

Mine went up a lot as well even though I now have a 1.1l car after I scrapped my Alfa and they said it was due to claiming for a cracked windscreen. I now pay £490 pa.

In article <op.1ger4vdjmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>, Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com>
wrote:
> I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and they
> tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with them
> anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I checked
> on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going on?

Husband and wife is usually cheaper.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 18:36:07 -0000, charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

> In article <op.1ger4vdjmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>, Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam..com>
> wrote:
>> I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and they
>> tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with them
>> anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I checked
>> on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going on?
>
> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.

Yip, I just fiddled with different options, and it's nothing to do with him being married or not. Adding a female driver lowers the premium, which is crazy. If you add your wife, all that's going to happen is more driving will take place. It cannot reduce the chances of an accident, since you'll use it the same amount yourself. In his case, his wife hated driving as she was getting a bit forgetful, so only he drove it. So basically, if you want a lower premium, put any woman as a second driver. It's not technically even fraud, since a named driver doesn't have to drive it, it's just there if they need it. I'm going to make someone up for my next policy. Or maybe perfectly legally put my sister on it, just in case she wants to borrow it sometime!

Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
> charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote
>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote

>>> I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and they
>>> tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with them
>>> anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I
>>> checked
>>> on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going on?
>>
>> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>
> Yip, I just fiddled with different options, and it's nothing to do with
> him being married or not. Adding a female driver lowers the premium,
> which is crazy.

Not if they make fewer claims, stupid.

> If you add your wife, all that's going to happen is more driving will
> take place.

More of your mindless bullshit.

> It cannot reduce the chances of an accident,

But can reduce the number of claims if they make fewer claims.

> since you'll use it the same amount yourself.

More of your mindless bullshit.

> In his case, his wife hated driving as she was getting a bit forgetful,
> so only he drove it.

Sure, but the insurance companys can't know that.

> So basically, if you want a lower premium, put any woman as a second
> driver. It's not technically even fraud,

Wrong if that woman will never drive it.

> since a named driver doesn't have to drive it, it's just there if they
> need it.

Which they never will.

> I'm going to make someone up for my next policy.

Thats fraud.

> Or maybe perfectly legally put my sister on it, just in case she wants
> to borrow it sometime!

Still fraud.

charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
> In article <op.1ger4vdjmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>, Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com>
> wrote:
> > I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and they
> > tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with them
> > anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I checked
> > on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going on?
>
> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>
Here in the UK more 'named drivers' on a policy nearly always reduce
the cost, it doesn't matter if they're related or not. We virtually
halved my M-I-L's premium by adding me, my wife and one of our
children to her policy (we really do drive her car quite a lot so it's
not 'cheating').

--
Chris Green
·

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 20:26:45 -0000, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>> charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote
>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>
>>>> I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and they
>>>> tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with them
>>>> anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I
>>>> checked
>>>> on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going on?
>>>
>>> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>>
>> Yip, I just fiddled with different options, and it's nothing to do with
>> him being married or not. Adding a female driver lowers the premium,
>> which is crazy.
>
> Not if they make fewer claims, stupid.
>
>> If you add your wife, all that's going to happen is more driving will
>> take place.
>
> More of your mindless bullshit.
>
>> It cannot reduce the chances of an accident,
>
> But can reduce the number of claims if they make fewer claims.
>
>> since you'll use it the same amount yourself.
>
> More of your mindless bullshit.
>
>> In his case, his wife hated driving as she was getting a bit forgetful,
>> so only he drove it.
>
> Sure, but the insurance companys can't know that.
>
>> So basically, if you want a lower premium, put any woman as a second
>> driver. It's not technically even fraud,
>
> Wrong if that woman will never drive it.

But above, his wife never drove it. Nothing has changed, there's still a car driven by a man, and a woman insured for it that never drives it.

>> since a named driver doesn't have to drive it, it's just there if they
>> need it.
>
> Which they never will.
>
>> I'm going to make someone up for my next policy.
>
> Thats fraud.
>
>> Or maybe perfectly legally put my sister on it, just in case she wants
>> to borrow it sometime!
>
> Still fraud.

They can't possibly know if my sister will ever use it when visiting me. It's there just in case she does.

Shit.... I don't think she has a license.

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 20:26:56 -0000, Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:

> charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
>> In article <op.1ger4vdjmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>, Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and they
>> > tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with them
>> > anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I checked
>> > on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going on?
>>
>> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>>
> Here in the UK more 'named drivers' on a policy nearly always reduce
> the cost, it doesn't matter if they're related or not. We virtually
> halved my M-I-L's premium by adding me, my wife and one of our
> children to her policy (we really do drive her car quite a lot so it's
> not 'cheating').

Doesn't always work like that. Consider a father adding his 17 year old son to his insurance, he's just passed his test, the premium will skyrocket. They ask when getting quotes about the named driver's history, so to reduce it, it has to be someone with a long clean driving history. And I'm sure it's some drivers being women that reduces it. Two men on a policy cannot be safer than one man, the car will clearly be used more by similar drivers.

I'm gonna have to add several women to my policy. It's not cheating even if they never drive it, the car is there just in case they want to. So is it cheaper to add more than one extra driver?

Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
> Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote
>> charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote
>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote

>>> > I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and
>>> they
>>> > tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with
>>> them
>>> > anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I
>>> checked
>>> > on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going
>>> on?
>>>
>>> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>>>
>> Here in the UK more 'named drivers' on a policy nearly always reduce
>> the cost, it doesn't matter if they're related or not. We virtually
>> halved my M-I-L's premium by adding me, my wife and one of our
>> children to her policy (we really do drive her car quite a lot so it's
>> not 'cheating').
>
> Doesn't always work like that. Consider a father adding his 17 year old
> son to his insurance, he's just passed his test, the premium will
> skyrocket. They ask when getting quotes about the named driver's
> history, so to reduce it, it has to be someone with a long clean driving
> history. And I'm sure it's some drivers being women that reduces it.

> Two men on a policy cannot be safer than one man, the car will clearly
> be used more by similar drivers.

That wrong too if both have their own cars and list each other
as well so they can borrow each others car is theirs breaks etc.

> I'm gonna have to add several women to my policy. It's not cheating
> even if they never drive it, the car is there just in case they want to.

Still fraud.

> So is it cheaper to add more than one extra driver?

Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>>> charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote
>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote

>>>>> I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and
>>>>> they
>>>>> tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with
>>>>> them
>>>>> anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I
>>>>> checked
>>>>> on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going
>>>>> on?
>>>>
>>>> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>>>
>>> Yip, I just fiddled with different options, and it's nothing to do with
>>> him being married or not. Adding a female driver lowers the premium,
>>> which is crazy.
>>
>> Not if they make fewer claims, stupid.
>>
>>> If you add your wife, all that's going to happen is more driving will
>>> take place.
>>
>> More of your mindless bullshit.
>>
>>> It cannot reduce the chances of an accident,
>>
>> But can reduce the number of claims if they make fewer claims.
>>
>>> since you'll use it the same amount yourself.
>>
>> More of your mindless bullshit.
>>
>>> In his case, his wife hated driving as she was getting a bit forgetful,
>>> so only he drove it.
>>
>> Sure, but the insurance companys can't know that.
>>
>>> So basically, if you want a lower premium, put any woman as a second
>>> driver. It's not technically even fraud,
>>
>> Wrong if that woman will never drive it.
>
> But above, his wife never drove it.

But the insurance company can't know that, stupid.

> Nothing has changed, there's still a car driven by a man, and a woman
> insured for it that never drives it.
>
>>> since a named driver doesn't have to drive it, it's just there if they
>>> need it.
>>
>> Which they never will.
>>
>>> I'm going to make someone up for my next policy.
>>
>> Thats fraud.
>>
>>> Or maybe perfectly legally put my sister on it, just in case she wants
>>> to borrow it sometime!
>>
>> Still fraud.
>
> They can't possibly know if my sister will ever use it when visiting
> me. It's there just in case she does.

Still fraud, just had to catch fraud.

> Shit.... I don't think she has a license.

Trade her in on one that does.

On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:09:23 PM UTC, Commander Kinsey wrote:

>
> Shit.... I don't think she has a license.

LICENCE in the UK.

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:37:34 -0000, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>> Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote
>>> charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote
>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>
>>>> > I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and
>>>> they
>>>> > tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with
>>>> them
>>>> > anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I
>>>> checked
>>>> > on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going
>>>> on?
>>>>
>>>> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>>>>
>>> Here in the UK more 'named drivers' on a policy nearly always reduce
>>> the cost, it doesn't matter if they're related or not. We virtually
>>> halved my M-I-L's premium by adding me, my wife and one of our
>>> children to her policy (we really do drive her car quite a lot so it's
>>> not 'cheating').
>>
>> Doesn't always work like that. Consider a father adding his 17 year old
>> son to his insurance, he's just passed his test, the premium will
>> skyrocket. They ask when getting quotes about the named driver's
>> history, so to reduce it, it has to be someone with a long clean driving
>> history. And I'm sure it's some drivers being women that reduces it.
>
>> Two men on a policy cannot be safer than one man, the car will clearly
>> be used more by similar drivers.
>
> That wrong too if both have their own cars and list each other
> as well so they can borrow each others car is theirs breaks etc.

If they hadn't put each other on their policies, less driving would be possible.

>> I'm gonna have to add several women to my policy. It's not cheating
>> even if they never drive it, the car is there just in case they want to.
>
> Still fraud.

No it isn't, there is no minimum amount of driving each driver has to do..

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:39:55 -0000, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>>>> charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote
>>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>
>>>>>> I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with
>>>>>> them
>>>>>> anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I
>>>>>> checked
>>>>>> on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going
>>>>>> on?
>>>>>
>>>>> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>>>>
>>>> Yip, I just fiddled with different options, and it's nothing to do with
>>>> him being married or not. Adding a female driver lowers the premium,
>>>> which is crazy.
>>>
>>> Not if they make fewer claims, stupid.
>>>
>>>> If you add your wife, all that's going to happen is more driving will
>>>> take place.
>>>
>>> More of your mindless bullshit.
>>>
>>>> It cannot reduce the chances of an accident,
>>>
>>> But can reduce the number of claims if they make fewer claims.
>>>
>>>> since you'll use it the same amount yourself.
>>>
>>> More of your mindless bullshit.
>>>
>>>> In his case, his wife hated driving as she was getting a bit forgetful,
>>>> so only he drove it.
>>>
>>> Sure, but the insurance companys can't know that.
>>>
>>>> So basically, if you want a lower premium, put any woman as a second
>>>> driver. It's not technically even fraud,
>>>
>>> Wrong if that woman will never drive it.
>>
>> But above, his wife never drove it.
>
> But the insurance company can't know that, stupid.
>
>> Nothing has changed, there's still a car driven by a man, and a woman
>> insured for it that never drives it.
>>
>>>> since a named driver doesn't have to drive it, it's just there if they
>>>> need it.
>>>
>>> Which they never will.
>>>
>>>> I'm going to make someone up for my next policy.
>>>
>>> Thats fraud.
>>>
>>>> Or maybe perfectly legally put my sister on it, just in case she wants
>>>> to borrow it sometime!
>>>
>>> Still fraud.
>>
>> They can't possibly know if my sister will ever use it when visiting
>> me. It's there just in case she does.
>
> Still fraud, just had to catch fraud.

No it isn't. It's remotely (very) possible she might want to drive it one day. Might aswell have that safety net there.

For my neighbour, I might suggest he puts one of his female neighbours (or me if it doesn't matter what sex they are) on his insurance just in case we need to give him a lift to hospital or something, more convenient if his car is left there for him to drive back. Oh, how would I get back. Anyway.... it might come in handy.

>> Shit.... I don't think she has a license.
>
> Trade her in on one that does.

Good idea.

Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>>> Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote
>>>> charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote
>>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote

>>>>> > I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and
>>>>> they
>>>>> > tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with
>>>>> them
>>>>> > anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I
>>>>> checked
>>>>> > on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going
>>>>> on?
>>>>>
>>>>> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>>>>>
>>>> Here in the UK more 'named drivers' on a policy nearly always reduce
>>>> the cost, it doesn't matter if they're related or not. We virtually
>>>> halved my M-I-L's premium by adding me, my wife and one of our
>>>> children to her policy (we really do drive her car quite a lot so it's
>>>> not 'cheating').
>>>
>>> Doesn't always work like that. Consider a father adding his 17 year
>>> old
>>> son to his insurance, he's just passed his test, the premium will
>>> skyrocket. They ask when getting quotes about the named driver's
>>> history, so to reduce it, it has to be someone with a long clean
>>> driving
>>> history. And I'm sure it's some drivers being women that reduces it..
>>
>>> Two men on a policy cannot be safer than one man, the car will clearly
>>> be used more by similar drivers.
>>
>> Thats wrong too if both have their own cars and list each other
>> as well so they can borrow each other's car is theirs breaks etc.
>
> If they hadn't put each other on their policies, less driving would be
> possible.

But when they had, it wouldnt be, stupid.

>>> I'm gonna have to add several women to my policy. It's not cheating
>>> even if they never drive it, the car is there just in case they want
>>> to.
>>
>> Still fraud.
>
> No it isn't,

Corse it is when they will never drive the car.

> there is no minimum amount of driving each driver has to do.

Irrelevant.

Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>>>>> charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote
>>>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote
>>
>>>>>>> I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>> anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I
>>>>>>> checked
>>>>>>> on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going
>>>>>>> on?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Husband and wife is usually cheaper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yip, I just fiddled with different options, and it's nothing to do
>>>>> with
>>>>> him being married or not. Adding a female driver lowers the premium,
>>>>> which is crazy.
>>>>
>>>> Not if they make fewer claims, stupid.
>>>>
>>>>> If you add your wife, all that's going to happen is more driving will
>>>>> take place.
>>>>
>>>> More of your mindless bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>> It cannot reduce the chances of an accident,
>>>>
>>>> But can reduce the number of claims if they make fewer claims.
>>>>
>>>>> since you'll use it the same amount yourself.
>>>>
>>>> More of your mindless bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>> In his case, his wife hated driving as she was getting a bit
>>>>> forgetful,
>>>>> so only he drove it.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, but the insurance companys can't know that.
>>>>
>>>>> So basically, if you want a lower premium, put any woman as a second
>>>>> driver. It's not technically even fraud,
>>>>
>>>> Wrong if that woman will never drive it.
>>>
>>> But above, his wife never drove it.
>>
>> But the insurance company can't know that, stupid.
>>
>>> Nothing has changed, there's still a car driven by a man, and a woman
>>> insured for it that never drives it.
>>>
>>>>> since a named driver doesn't have to drive it, it's just there if
>>>>> they
>>>>> need it.
>>>>
>>>> Which they never will.
>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to make someone up for my next policy.
>>>>
>>>> Thats fraud.
>>>>
>>>>> Or maybe perfectly legally put my sister on it, just in case she
>>>>> wants
>>>>> to borrow it sometime!
>>>>
>>>> Still fraud.
>>>
>>> They can't possibly know if my sister will ever use it when visiting
>>> me. It's there just in case she does.
>>
>> Still fraud, just hard to catch fraud.

> No it isn't.

Corse it is.

> It's remotely (very) possible she might want to drive it one day. Might
> aswell have that safety net there.

Even sillier than you usually manage and thats saying something.

> For my neighbour, I might suggest he puts one of his female neighbours
> (or me if it doesn't matter what sex they are) on his insurance just in
> case we need to give him a lift to hospital or something, more
> convenient if his car is left there for him to drive back.

OTOH there is the parking fee at the hospital that way.
And you have to get back somehow yourself, stupid.

> Oh, how would I get back. Anyway.... it might come in handy.
>
>>> Shit.... I don't think she has a license.
>>
>> Trade her in on one that does.
>
> Good idea.

On 22/01/2022 06:04 pm, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 5:56:49 PM UTC, Commander Kinsey wrote:

>> I just looked at my elderly neighbour's car insurance renewal, and they tried to raise the price from £260 to £315, I'll have a word with them anyway, and need to remove his deceased wife from it, but when I checked on a comparison site, the cheapest elsewhere was £450! WTF's going on?

> Mine went up a lot as well even though I now have a 1.1l car after I scrapped my Alfa and they said it was due to claiming for a cracked windscreen. I now pay £490 pa.

You are obviously - and perhaps understandably, given your history
(assuming you declared it) - seen as a bad risk, with a premium like
that at your age and in such a low powered car.

My comprehensive policy for a two-litre car is well under half that.

On 23/01/22 07:40, Peeler wrote:
> WTF has this shit got to do with a ng like urc, you fucked up troll-feeding
> senile asshole?

Epidermal mucus is secreted at a slow and relatively constant rate to
replace the dispersal of mucus from Peeler's outer surface

On 23/01/22 08:49, Peeler wrote:
> What could be cheaper and dumber than a troll and a troll-feeding senile
> asshole like you? Eh, senile twit?

The movement of Peeler's dental plate acts in a similar way to a fixed
pulley.

On 23/01/22 09:38, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler's pulley system allows maximal force transmission, but does not
permit speed amplification.

On 23/01/22 10:54, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler's brain has several Nervous System regions. Anterior and dorsal
to the optic chiasm is the unpaired preoptic nucleus.

On 23/01/22 11:51, Peeler wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 09:25:27 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
> Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:
>
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>
>
There is, however, no neurohaemal region in Peeler comparable to the
median eminence of most other vertebrates.

On 23/01/22 11:01, Peeler wrote:

>
> Feeling better now, troll-feeding senile idiot? <G>

The presence of GnRH has been demonstrated in Peeler, and it varies
seasonally with his reproductive state.

On 23/01/22 11:54, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler, covered in his own slime, will suffocate.

On 23/01/22 11:08, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler is called ‘snotty’ or ‘slime hag’ because he can release
prodigious quantities of mucins from glands running in two lines down
the length of his body.

On 23/01/22 07:38, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the subnormal sociopathic trolling attention whore's latest
> attention-baiting sick bullshit unread again>

Mucin threads are ejected forcefully from Peelr's slime glands. Once
outside him the threads trap copious quantities of water.