On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
> On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>
>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>
>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>
>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>
>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
>>
>> No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
>> experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
>> through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
>> of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
>> not. You show no sign of self awareness.
>
> You are 'spot on', Snit.

He's overmedicated ;)

You know I've given you example HTML that you have turned into a page
and run (you've even written some of your own so stop lying).

On 04/04/2022 20:49, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>> On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>> <t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
>>>
>>> No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
>>> experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
>>> through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
>>> of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
>>> not. You show no sign of self awareness.
>>
>> IAWTP
>
> LOL! Drugs and alcohol, folks... beware!

I use neither drugs NOR alcohol.

Why do you need and use them, Steve Carroll?

On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>
>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>
>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>
>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>
>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>>> it, troll.
>>
>>
>> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
>> failing to run EtreCheck.
>
> First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...

OK - we'll set that aside.

> Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,

I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.

My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to
download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
me in that endeavour.

> I use the terminal for things of that nature that I'm interested in. BTW,
> your question has shifted again, you realize that, right? Isn't this
> supposed to be a "Question "about JavaScript"? So why aren't you talking
> "about JavaScript"? Did you think no one would notice what you're doing?

I'm working for the common good.

> Do you think your 'friend' will agree with me on this point being that
> he states things like:
>
> "I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
>
> and
>
> "I encourage people to act as I do" - Snit
>
> "I am, of course, honest and honorable... something which some people
> appreciate but others fear.  And loath" - Snit
>
> Were he as "honest and honorable" as he's tried to sell himself, it's
> only logical to assume that he should be along 'any minute now' to
> "encourage" one of his 'friends' to "act as" he does, right? Maybe he
> doesn't have enough energy left over after his 'pile on' attempts ;)

I TRUST Snit. Sadly, I do NOT trust Steve Carroll. :-(

On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
> On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>>>> it, troll.
>>>
>>>
>>> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
>>
>> First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
>> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
>
> OK - we'll set that aside.

You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.

>> Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
>
> I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.

Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:

<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>

> My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to
> download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
> me in that endeavour.

No, you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting"
how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people. What's up with
that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the
world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser
has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?

On 04/04/2022 23:48, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>> On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>>>>> it, troll.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
>>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
>>>
>>> First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
>>> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
>>
>> OK - we'll set that aside.
>
> You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.

I've not argued the toss.

>>> Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
>>
>> I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
>
> Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
>
> <https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>

Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!

It's taken you a very long time to identify the REAL target!

https://jmp.sh/iecrmhJ

Working out to be a pretty good scam, eh?!!

>> My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to
>> download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
>> me in that endeavour.
>
> No, you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting"
> how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people. What's up with
> that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
> such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the
> world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser
> has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?

I've had a good life thanks. I reflect on the time when HRH Prince
Andrew had to address ME as 'Sir' when he was undergoing his helicopter
flying training. I was the ATC training officer at the time, teaching
him The Rules Of The Air before he was let loose to fly solo!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Andrew,_Duke_of_York

On Apr 4, 2022 at 3:48:58 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fskq$vi1$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>> On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>>>>> it, troll.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
>>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
>>>
>>> First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
>>> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
>>
>> OK - we'll set that aside.
>
> You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.

More of your drama.
>
>>> Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
>>
>> I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
>
> Of course you do,

And here you speak for him. You do that a lot.

>
>> My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to
>> download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
>> me in that endeavour.
>
> No,

Again you seek to speak FOR him. Why not try to listen? Why not seek to
understand?

> you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting"
> how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people.

Here you are targeting people to push your drama.

> What's up with
> that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
> such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the
> world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser
> has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?

Projection filled drama from you.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:17:56 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fg94$42s$14@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>
>>>>
>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>
>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
>>
>> No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
>> experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
>> through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
>> of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
>> not. You show no sign of self awareness.

Below you project your own crap as you ignore what I said.

> Of course I do, I've given him examples of it and he's done so.
>
> Stop lying... and sober up.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:15:12 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fg3v$42s$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:43:14 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <t2fe82$42s$5@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>>>> --------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>>
>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>
>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>
>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>
>>> Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
>>> is pretty silly, isn't it?
>>
>> You think people owe you for your pushing of games and drama. It is a part of
>> your entitlement worldview.

> You have it backwards,

No, I have it exactly right.

> he's the one who asked me for help

Nobody said, suggested, hinted, or implied otherwise.

>
>>> You began the other thread by asking a
>>> question you didn't really want answered.
>>
>> He never said that. If you answered the question it was buried in your
>> nonsense about giving him assignments and speaking for him.

> He proved it

No. You made it up. You lied. As you do. You cannot stop pushing your idiotic
drama.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:10:03 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2ffqb$42s$12@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (snip goofy pretense at mind reading)
>
>>>>> I *did* help...
>>>>
>>>> You might have had bits of help
>>>
>>> How would YOU know,
>>
>> I read your comments.

>> Seriously, why do you play these stupid games?

And you have no answer... you just push more drama and games.

>
> Exactly, YOU read them and they're about a topic you "do not know". Now
> answer why you would "know" what you stated you "do not know". How does
> that work?
>
> (snip more projection)

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 1:04:17 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fj01$imf$5@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>> On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>> <t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
>>>
>>> No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
>>> experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
>>> through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
>>> of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
>>> not. You show no sign of self awareness.
>>
>> You are 'spot on', Snit.
>
> He's overmedicated ;)

More of your focus on medications.

>
> You know I've given you example HTML that you have turned into a page
> and run (you've even written some of your own so stop lying).

I doubt even you have any idea what your are talking about. Whatever it is it
surely is not relevant to anything happening now. You live in the past and
make up stories about it to try to defend your poor behavior.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 1:02:50 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fita$imf$4@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>
>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>
>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>
>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>
>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>>> it, troll.
>>
>>
>> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
>> failing to run EtreCheck.
>
> First off, you didn't demny it so,

Just today you were mocking me for typos. Here you are making one.

But you have double standards.

> according to the 'logic' your
> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...

Here you are speaking FOR me. No, I have never backed your lies, nor suggested
you are not dishonest. You are. You lie pretty much non-stop.

> Why would I entertain your faulty logic?

Here you are dodging questions. Why not just say why you refuse to run it? But
you prefer drama.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:49:49 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fi4t$imf$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>
> LOL! Drugs and alcohol, folks... beware!

Why not seek help for your problem?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:34:48 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sLH2K.41421$Xa1.30458@fx10.ams1>:

> On 04/04/2022 19:50, Snit wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:43:14 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <t2fe82$42s$5@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>>>> --------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>>
>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>
>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>
>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>
>>> Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
>>> is pretty silly, isn't it?
>>
>> You think people owe you for your pushing of games and drama. It is a part of
>> your entitlement worldview.
>>
>>> You began the other thread by asking a
>>> question you didn't really want answered.
>>
>> He never said that. If you answered the question it was buried in your
>> nonsense about giving him assignments and speaking for him.
>>
>>> Then you 'rattled cages'. Why
>>> should anyone ever follow your BS? Work to make it less obvious <shrug>.
>>
>> You play games and when you are called out you play victim.
>
> IAWTP
>
> All true.

It is likely a waste of time, but when I spent a few days calling out as many
of his lies as I reasonably could his lying did, for a while, reduce. I figure
I might try to the same with his drama and victim games.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:34:07 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<PKH2K.41420$Xa1.2209@fx10.ams1>:

> On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>
>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>
>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>
>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>
>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
>>
>> No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
>> experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
>> through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
>> of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
>> not. You show no sign of self awareness.
>
> You are 'spot on', Snit. You help me, and I much appreciate that. :-)

It is a shame Carroll cannot understand people... he DOES have decent tech
skills and shows his code and other work. He shows more skill than Gremlin /
LegionX, but he prefers drama and trolling over tech.

>
> I'm not playing games. https://jumpshare.com/v/WT3YiIJ24vE8nmkaJcS2

Curious.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:32:27 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<fJH2K.41419$Xa1.20920@fx10.ams1>:

> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>
>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>
>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>
>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>
>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>
>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>
>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>
>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>> it, troll.
>
>
> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
> failing to run EtreCheck.

Not enough time... he spends it all trolling and pushing drama.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:25:08 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<oCH2K.25058$sMg.22678@fx06.ams1>:

> On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>
>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>
>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>
>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>
>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
>>
>> No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
>> experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
>> through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
>> of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
>> not. You show no sign of self awareness.
>
> IAWTP

I am hoping Carroll will reduce this nonsense of his, as he did reduce his
lying, even if just for a bit, when I called that out.

It is a likely impossible task, but might as well try it.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:25:43 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<X7L2K.394158$F_q1.350248@fx01.ams1>:

> On 04/04/2022 23:48, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>>>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>>>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>>>>>> it, troll.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
>>>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
>>>>
>>>> First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
>>>> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
>>>
>>> OK - we'll set that aside.
>>
>> You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
>
> I've not argued the toss.
>
>>>> Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
>>>
>>> I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
>>
>> Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
>>
>> <https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
>
> Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!

He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them. Carroll
now denies it but I have shown you posts where he directly talks about
contacting one of my employers.

> It's taken you a very long time to identify the REAL target!
>
> https://jmp.sh/iecrmhJ
>
> Working out to be a pretty good scam, eh?!!
>
>>> My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to
>>> download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
>>> me in that endeavour.
>>
>> No, you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting"
>> how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people. What's up with
>> that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
>> such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the
>> world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser
>> has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?
>
> I've had a good life thanks. I reflect on the time when HRH Prince
> Andrew had to address ME as 'Sir' when he was undergoing his helicopter
> flying training. I was the ATC training officer at the time, teaching
> him The Rules Of The Air before he was let loose to fly solo!
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Andrew,_Duke_of_York

You focus on good things, and on your own life. Not putting others down. That
is commendable.

I wish Carroll felt better about himself.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 05/04/2022 01:02, Snit wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:25:43 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
> <X7L2K.394158$F_q1.350248@fx01.ams1>:
>
>> On 04/04/2022 23:48, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>>>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>>>>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>>>>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>>>>>>> it, troll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
>>>>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
>>>>>
>>>>> First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
>>>>> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
>>>>
>>>> OK - we'll set that aside.
>>>
>>> You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
>>
>> I've not argued the toss.
>>
>>>>> Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
>>>>
>>>> I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
>>>
>>> Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
>>>
>>> <https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
>>
>> Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
>
> He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them. Carroll
> now denies it but I have shown you posts where he directly talks about
> contacting one of my employers.

Perhaps he - mistakenly - thought you were a 'bad guy'?!!!

You have proved to me that you are not! :-D

>> It's taken you a very long time to identify the REAL target!
>>
>> https://jmp.sh/iecrmhJ
>>
>> Working out to be a pretty good scam, eh?!!
>>
>>>> My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to
>>>> download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
>>>> me in that endeavour.
>>>
>>> No, you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting"
>>> how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people. What's up with
>>> that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
>>> such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the
>>> world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser
>>> has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?
>>
>> I've had a good life thanks. I reflect on the time when HRH Prince
>> Andrew had to address ME as 'Sir' when he was undergoing his helicopter
>> flying training. I was the ATC training officer at the time, teaching
>> him The Rules Of The Air before he was let loose to fly solo!
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Andrew,_Duke_of_York
>
> You focus on good things, and on your own life. Not putting others down. That
> is commendable.

I do. Thank you.

> I wish Carroll felt better about himself.

Indeed. Who will look after him in his dotage?

On 05/04/2022 00:57, Snit wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:34:48 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
> <sLH2K.41421$Xa1.30458@fx10.ams1>:
>
>> On 04/04/2022 19:50, Snit wrote:
>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:43:14 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>> <t2fe82$42s$5@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>>>>> --------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>
>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>
>>>> Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
>>>> is pretty silly, isn't it?
>>>
>>> You think people owe you for your pushing of games and drama. It is a part of
>>> your entitlement worldview.
>>>
>>>> You began the other thread by asking a
>>>> question you didn't really want answered.
>>>
>>> He never said that. If you answered the question it was buried in your
>>> nonsense about giving him assignments and speaking for him.
>>>
>>>> Then you 'rattled cages'. Why
>>>> should anyone ever follow your BS? Work to make it less obvious <shrug>.
>>>
>>> You play games and when you are called out you play victim.
>>
>> IAWTP
>>
>> All true.
>
> It is likely a waste of time, but when I spent a few days calling out as many
> of his lies as I reasonably could his lying did, for a while, reduce. I figure
> I might try to the same with his drama and victim games.

Please ..... only do so if you feel strong enough to cope with the
battle. Good luck if you do! :-D

On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

(snip)

>>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
>>>>
>>>> No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
>>>> experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
>>>> through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
>>>> of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
>>>> not. You show no sign of self awareness.
>>>
>>> You are 'spot on', Snit.

You say that, yet, you're tacitly admitting you could run the example
(and what choice do you have when you know that the usenet archive is
sitting there, waiting to demolish any lie you try to tell on this?).

>> He's overmedicated ;)
>
> More of your focus on medications.

Well, I was discussin YOU, so...

>> You know I've given you example HTML that you have turned into a page
>> and run (you've even written some of your own so stop lying).
>
> I doubt even you have any idea what your are talking about.

Reality, nothing for you to worry your pointy, overmedicated little head
over ;)

"I've not argued the toss." - DB

Translation:
He *can't* 'argue the toss.

Unlike you, there are still some pieces of reality he won't swim
upstream against.

On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2022 at 1:02:50 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
><t2fita$imf$4@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>>>> it, troll.
>>>
>>>
>>> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
>>
>> First off, you didn't demny it so,
>
> Just today you were mocking me for typos.

In a post where you had several and were calling "others" an "illiterate
fraud". What about it?

> Here you are making one.

You think the two things are similar, do you? Here, I'm only stating
what *he* has proven (that he can save and run an HTML file), as opposed
to what you were doing. So again, the obvious question: Why do you
persist in the goofy belief that you're like "others" when you keep
proving you aren't?

> But you have double standards.

LOL! Projection. Irony. Comedy. Combo pack ;)

>> according to the 'logic' your
>> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
>
>
> Here you are speaking FOR me.

So why did you snip away your words? *I* put your words up, YOU removed
them. Sober up and think about that.

>> Why would I entertain your faulty logic?
>
> Here you are dodging questions.

I answered his question in what you snipped away, but it was a stupid
question only asked in pursuit of his agenda (asked in 'bad faith').

On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:49:49 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
><t2fi4t$imf$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>> LOL! Drugs and alcohol, folks... beware!
>
> Why not seek help for your problem?

Because, unlike you, I don't rat people out to their ISP, I actually
believe in free speech. Besides, you're not that much of a problem,
neither is DB. If you two want to imbibe while posting that's your
business but it does explain a lot <shrug>.

On 4/5/2022 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:49:49 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <t2fi4t$imf$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>> LOL! Drugs and alcohol, folks... beware!
>>
>> Why not seek help for your problem?
>
> Because, unlike you, I don't rat people out to their ISP, I actually
> believe in free speech. Besides, you're not that much of a problem,
> neither is DB. If you two want to imbibe while posting that's your
> business but it does explain a lot <shrug>.

Didn't your own son Ryan mention that you are a longtime substance
abuser, Tailpiep Head?

--
Lefty Lundquist

On 2022-04-05, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
> On 05/04/2022 01:02, Snit wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:25:43 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>> <X7L2K.394158$F_q1.350248@fx01.ams1>:
>>
>>> On 04/04/2022 23:48, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dev who created this product.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> By ignoring it? How does that work?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A bit like rattling a cage.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - and would like YOU to help.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
>>>>>>>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Baby-step instructions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
>>>>>>>>> others can have different areas of knowledge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
>>>>>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
>>>>>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
>>>>>>>> it, troll.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
>>>>>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
>>>>>> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
>>>>>
>>>>> OK - we'll set that aside.
>>>>
>>>> You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
>>>
>>> I've not argued the toss.
>>>
>>>>>> Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
>>>>
>>>> Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
>>>>
>>>> <https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
>>>
>>> Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
>>
>> He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them. Carroll
>> now denies it but I have shown you posts where he directly talks about
>> contacting one of my employers.
>
> Perhaps he - mistakenly - thought you were a 'bad guy'?!!!

Right, me and virtually everyone he's ever come into contact with on
usenet. Pull the other one.

> You have proved to me that you are not! :-D

Total bull.

On 2022-04-05, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

(snip)

>>>> I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
>>>
>>> Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
>>>
>>> <https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
>>
>> Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
>
> He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them.

And you'll 'prove' that 'any minute now' <eyeroll>. DB should know
where I got that from.