On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 11:37:31 +1100, Max <max@invalid.address> wrote:

> On 2/11/2022 5:04 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2022 17:43:34 +1100, Max <max@invalid.address> wrote:
>>
>>> On 31/10/2022 10:14 pm, Phil Allison wrote:
>>>> Stinking Wog Cunt Max wrote:
>>>> =========================
>>>>>
>>>>> An employer cannot just sack a person because they have stopped
>>>>> liking them or they want their mate to have the job.

Wrong, as always.

>>>> ** ROTFLMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>> Fucking happens * every day of the week * !!!
>>>> Nothing stops such things happening, such bosses *lie like bastards*
>>>> when queried over their vile decisions.
>>
>>>> Regular employees have no protection, a tiny few unionist excepted.
>>
>>> How can an employee defend themselves against this sort of behaviour?

>> Dont piss the boss off so they don't get sacked, stupid.

> Some people have whatever personality they have. It's not their fault.

Wrong, as always.

> They should not get sacked if they are doing a good job.

Wrong, as always.

>>> Surely they can begin an unfair dismissal action?

>> But with fuck all chance of succeedings, stupid.

> We'll see.

We've seen that you are a pathological lying bludger, Pinnochio.

> Why do you think there are unfair dismissal laws

There are no laws that prevent an employer sacking an employee
and replacing them with someone else they prefer to employ.

> if there is no chance of ever succeeding.

I said fuck all, not no chance, fuckwit.

On 2/11/2022 11:55 am, Rod Speed wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 11:37:31 +1100, Max <max@invalid.address> wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/2022 5:04 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2022 17:43:34 +1100, Max <max@invalid.address> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 31/10/2022 10:14 pm, Phil Allison wrote:
>>>>> Stinking Wog Cunt Max wrote:
>>>>> =========================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An employer cannot just sack a person because they have stopped
>>>>>> liking them or they want their mate to have the job.
>
> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>>>  **  ROTFLMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>  Fucking happens * every day of the week *  !!!
>>>>> Nothing stops such things happening, such bosses *lie like
>>>>> bastards* when queried over their vile decisions.
>>>
>>>>>   Regular employees have no protection, a tiny few unionist excepted.
>>>
>>>> How can an employee defend themselves against this sort of behaviour?
>
>>>  Dont piss the boss off so they don't get sacked, stupid.
>
>> Some people have whatever personality they have.  It's not their fault.
>
> Wrong, as always.
>
>> They should not get sacked if they are doing a good job.
>
> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>> Surely they can begin an unfair dismissal action?
>
>>>  But with fuck all chance of succeedings, stupid.
>
>> We'll see.
>
> We've seen that you are a pathological lying bludger, Pinnochio.
>
>> Why do you think there are unfair dismissal laws
>
> There are no laws that prevent an employer sacking an employee
> and replacing them with someone else they prefer to employ.
>

That is absolute bullshit. The only lawful reasons for termination are
redundancy, performance, capacity and conduct.

"Refilling the position with a new employee is not a genuine redundancy."

An employer cannot just sack someone because their old mate has come
back into town and they want to give him a job.

You are 100% wrong about that. You just wish the world was like that so
you and your areshole mates can piss all over other people.

>> if there is  no chance of ever succeeding.
>
> I said fuck all, not no chance, fuckwit.

On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 20:09:24 +1100, Max <max@invalid.address> wrote:

> On 2/11/2022 11:55 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 11:37:31 +1100, Max <max@invalid.address> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/11/2022 5:04 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2022 17:43:34 +1100, Max <max@invalid.address> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 31/10/2022 10:14 pm, Phil Allison wrote:
>>>>>> Stinking Wog Cunt Max wrote:
>>>>>> =========================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An employer cannot just sack a person because they have stopped
>>>>>>> liking them or they want their mate to have the job.
>> Wrong, as always.
>>
>>>>>> ** ROTFLMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>> Fucking happens * every day of the week * !!!
>>>>>> Nothing stops such things happening, such bosses *lie like
>>>>>> bastards* when queried over their vile decisions.
>>>>
>>>>>> Regular employees have no protection, a tiny few unionist
>>>>>> excepted.
>>>>
>>>>> How can an employee defend themselves against this sort of behaviour?
>>
>>>> Dont piss the boss off so they don't get sacked, stupid.
>>
>>> Some people have whatever personality they have. It's not their fault.
>> Wrong, as always.
>>
>>> They should not get sacked if they are doing a good job.
>> Wrong, as always.
>>
>>>>> Surely they can begin an unfair dismissal action?
>>
>>>> But with fuck all chance of succeedings, stupid.
>>
>>> We'll see.
>> We've seen that you are a pathological lying bludger, Pinnochio.
>>
>>> Why do you think there are unfair dismissal laws
>> There are no laws that prevent an employer sacking an employee
>> and replacing them with someone else they prefer to employ.

> That is absolute bullshit.

Wrong, as always.

> The only lawful reasons for termination are redundancy, performance,
> capacity and conduct.

Wrong, as always.

> "Refilling the position with a new employee is not a genuine redundancy."

Pity about performance, capacity and conduct.

> An employer cannot just sack someone because their old mate has come
> back into town and they want to give him a job.

Wrong, as always.

> You are 100% wrong about that.

Nope, you are, as always.

> You just wish the world was like that so you and your areshole mates can
> piss all over other people.

Wrong, as always.

>>> if there is no chance of ever succeeding.
>> I said fuck all, not no chance, fuckwit.