*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote

>>> Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing.
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> This should be good.
>>
> The offspring of Sylvester and Tweety Bird?

Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this newsgroup, Hemidactylus.
The reason is I study you strange people as I've never met anyone like you.

You see the word "catenary".
You are told it has something to do with "racing".
Specifically something about "teaching" racing, right?

And your only response is to make silly childish kindergarten jokes?
Every response from you, Hemidactylus, shows your IQ is abnormally low.

Don't worry about your IQ.
You can't do anything about it (except prove it every time you post).

That abnormally low IQ is a trait of all the iKooks, Hemidactylus
Jolly Roger, Alan Browne, Alan Baker, Chris, Lewis, nospam, et al.

Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word
"catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?
--
The Apple iKooks are all of such an abnormally low IQ that they can't ever
form any semblance of an adult response to any fact about Apple products.

On 2023-12-20 10:12, Wally J wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>> That just means each of the authors don't know the first thing about
>> cars.
>
> It's always the same with you low-IQ ignorant child-like iKooks, JR.
>
> Remember, Alan Browne is the same low-IQ ignorant child-like iKook who
> repeatedly claimed it was impossible to change newsreader headers, JR.
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
>
> All you low-IQ iKooks greatly suffer from the D-K left-quartile flaws, JR.
>
> For example, that you actually believe a technical book would use common
> slang is interesting. It might. But it just as likely might not. The mere
> fact they don't use slang isn't any indication that they're unaware of it.
>
> Certainly NOBODY who is on a BMW forum would _ever_ be unaware, JR.
> (They ridicule the hell out of any moron who doesn't know these words.)

I'm not on any BMW forums, Arlen.

>
> Remember, Alan Baker "said" he's a racer & teacher - and yet - he clearly
> did not know the simplest things about that which he claims excellence.
>
> What's different is that someone who supposedly has been owning BMWs and
> racing cars (and even "teaching" racing, if you can believe that),
> who doesn't know the first thing about those cars - is either extremely
> a. ignorant - or -
> b. a liar.
>
> Pick one.

You're both ignorant AND a liar.

:-)

On 2023-12-20 10:33, Wally J wrote:
> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>
>>>> Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing.
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> This should be good.
>>>
>> The offspring of Sylvester and Tweety Bird?
>
> Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this newsgroup, Hemidactylus.
> The reason is I study you strange people as I've never met anyone like you.
>
> You see the word "catenary".
> You are told it has something to do with "racing".
> Specifically something about "teaching" racing, right?
>
> And your only response is to make silly childish kindergarten jokes?
> Every response from you, Hemidactylus, shows your IQ is abnormally low.
>
> Don't worry about your IQ.
> You can't do anything about it (except prove it every time you post).
>
> That abnormally low IQ is a trait of all the iKooks, Hemidactylus
> Jolly Roger, Alan Browne, Alan Baker, Chris, Lewis, nospam, et al.
>
> Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word
> "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?

Let's see YOUR response, Arlen...

....oh, wait!

You have be killfiled!

On 2023-12-20 10:24, Wally J wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>>> While I don't claim to be a racer, I know what a catenary is.
>>
>> Is that what you will end up hanging yourself with, you sorry sack of
>> shit? We can dream...
>
> Hi Jolly Roger,
>
> I love when all you iKooks post. I really do. I read EVERYTHING you say.
> I learn (about you) from you, in fact, Jolly Roger. And from Alan Browne.
>
> Also from Hemidactylus. It's only Joerg and Alan Baker that I plonked.
> Everything I post to the child-like Apple newsgroups has a purpose.
>
> A. To disseminate (or learn) facts about Apple products, and,
> B. To show the iKooks for what they are.
>
> The reason for bringing up the fact Alan Baker claimed repeatedly that
> nobody could change newsreader headers was to prove that the iKooks form
> very strong belief systems which are based on exactly zero actual facts.
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
>
> It's the same reason I bring up that Alan Baker claimed repeatedly that he
> "taught racing" and owns a BMW, and yet, he knows nothing about either.
>
> That's why I brought up the word "catenary" which _every_ (real) racer
> knows all about, as it's one of the most important words in racing schools.

No... ...it really isn't.

I attended Skip Barber's 3-day school in 2012 and they never once
mentioned it.

I followed that up with attending two of their advanced 1-day schools
and it wasn't mentioned then, either.

BTW, I was such a good student, that I got to attend their free contest
for their best 33 students at Sebring Raceway in their "Skip Barber
INDYCAR Academy" competition for a fully-sponsored ride in the "Skip
Barber Formula Car Series" as the first step on the "Mazda Road to Indy".

<https://www.skipbarber.com/2013/01/16/skip-barber-racing-school-indycar-academy-field/>

I was the oldest in the field by 12 years at age 51.

>
> Yet I'll be Alan Baker is, at this very moment, furiously googling what the
> word catenary means - and all he's finding is cites about bridge building.

No... ...I know what you think its relevance is...

....but you're wrong...

....and I can prove it.

>
> This so-called "racer" is confused by that word. Bewildered. Flummoxed.
> His low-IQ brain can't figure out what a catenary has to do with racing.

And you won't ever say...

....coward.

On 2023-12-20 10:15, Wally J wrote:
> Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote
>
>> Remember, Alan Browne is the same low-IQ ignorant child-like iKook who
>> repeatedly claimed it was impossible to change newsreader headers, JR.
>> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
>>
>> All you low-IQ iKooks greatly suffer from the D-K left-quartile flaws, JR.
>
> Correction. I get these iKooks confused.
>
> Alan Brown is the low-IQ ignorant iKook who has never seen the walled
> garden (and, in fact, he claims because he is ignorant of it, it can't
> exist).
>
> Who is that ignorant?
> Nobody, right?
>
> Nobody but iKooks.
>
> Meanwhile...
>
> Alan Baker is the low-IQ ignorant iKook who claims to teach racing and own
> BMWs and yet he doesn't know even the slightest about bimmers or beemers.

I know quite a lot about BMWs

I just don't go in for slang much.

:-)

Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>
>>>> Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing.
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> This should be good.
>>>
>> The offspring of Sylvester and Tweety Bird?
>
> Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this newsgroup, Hemidactylus.
> The reason is I study you strange people as I've never met anyone like you.
>
> You see the word "catenary".
> You are told it has something to do with "racing".
> Specifically something about "teaching" racing, right?
>
> And your only response is to make silly childish kindergarten jokes?
> Every response from you, Hemidactylus, shows your IQ is abnormally low.
>
> Don't worry about your IQ.
> You can't do anything about it (except prove it every time you post).
>
> That abnormally low IQ is a trait of all the iKooks, Hemidactylus
> Jolly Roger, Alan Browne, Alan Baker, Chris, Lewis, nospam, et al.
>
> Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word
> "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?

Oh great an obsessive stalker.

On 2023-12-20 14:55, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
> Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>>
>>>>> Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing.
>>>>
>>>> LOL!
>>>>
>>>> This should be good.
>>>>
>>> The offspring of Sylvester and Tweety Bird?
>>
>> Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this newsgroup, Hemidactylus.
>> The reason is I study you strange people as I've never met anyone like you.
>>
>> You see the word "catenary".
>> You are told it has something to do with "racing".
>> Specifically something about "teaching" racing, right?
>>
>> And your only response is to make silly childish kindergarten jokes?
>> Every response from you, Hemidactylus, shows your IQ is abnormally low.
>>
>> Don't worry about your IQ.
>> You can't do anything about it (except prove it every time you post).
>>
>> That abnormally low IQ is a trait of all the iKooks, Hemidactylus
>> Jolly Roger, Alan Browne, Alan Baker, Chris, Lewis, nospam, et al.
>>
>> Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word
>> "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?
>
> Oh great an obsessive stalker.
>

The hilarious part is that he claims to have me killfiled, and if so,
he'll never see my reply anyway.

:-)

*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote

>> Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word
>> "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?
>
> Oh great an obsessive stalker.

No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.

Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if he
desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing, particularly
when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers depending on the track.

If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to hold
yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms after all.

Yet he doesn't.
So he won't.

*You think I don't know how ignorant all you iKooks are Hemidactylus?*

Whether or not you quote his replies, my point is that all you iKooks are
a. Low IQ
b. Uneducated
c. Ignorant

Such that you iKooks are so far to the left of the D-K first quartile that
you don't even realize how ignorant you are - as you think you're a genius.

Which is the point.

While I don't ever claim to be a racer, nor a teacher, I probably already
know more about racing than the iKook Alan Baker will know in his life.

That's literally how incredibly ignorant all you iKooks are Hemidactylus.
A. *Who is so ignorant to claim Apple fully patches older releases?*
Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Jolly Roger says so all the time.

B. *Who is so ignorant to claim the famed walled garden doesn't exist?*
Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Alan Browne says so all the time.

C. *Who is so ignorant to claim imaginary graphical WiFi strength apps?*
Nobody right? Yet the ignorant nospam fabricates the apps all the time.

It's no longer shocking how utterly ignorant all iKooks are, Hemidactylus.

Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term even as
it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in racing.
--
The problem with the iKooks isn't so much they own the brains of small
children, but more that they don't realize they are incredibly ignorant.

Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>
>>> Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word
>>> "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?
>>
>> Oh great an obsessive stalker.
>
> No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
>
I was referring to your “Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this
newsgroup, Hemidactylus.” creeper.
>
> Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if he
> desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing, particularly
> when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers depending on the track.
>
> If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to hold
> yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms after all.
>
> Yet he doesn't.
> So he won't.
>
> *You think I don't know how ignorant all you iKooks are Hemidactylus?*
>
> Whether or not you quote his replies, my point is that all you iKooks are
> a. Low IQ
> b. Uneducated
> c. Ignorant
>
> Such that you iKooks are so far to the left of the D-K first quartile that
> you don't even realize how ignorant you are - as you think you're a genius.
>
So you make up some fictitious category “iKooks” lacking real application
in the world and still cling to the illusory statistical artifact of the
D-K graph. Then you pretend to lecture me about anything. Silly ignorant
kook.
>
> Which is the point.
>
> While I don't ever claim to be a racer, nor a teacher, I probably already
> know more about racing than the iKook Alan Baker will know in his life.
>
> That's literally how incredibly ignorant all you iKooks are Hemidactylus.
> A. *Who is so ignorant to claim Apple fully patches older releases?*
> Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Jolly Roger says so all the time.
>
> B. *Who is so ignorant to claim the famed walled garden doesn't exist?*
> Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Alan Browne says so all the time.
>
> C. *Who is so ignorant to claim imaginary graphical WiFi strength apps?*
> Nobody right? Yet the ignorant nospam fabricates the apps all the time.
>
> It's no longer shocking how utterly ignorant all iKooks are, Hemidactylus.
>
> Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term even as
> it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in racing.

How would you know? Aren’t you a mere dilettante at best? Maybe you’re way
out of your league. I don’t trust you to convey much of anything accurately
as you’re just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a GED and a
mail-order degree from a diploma mill.

John Hill <watcombeman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote

> However, I suspect that Alan may have a point. I will continue to be amused by
> the antics of the trolls and those who rise to their bait - silently.

Please be a bit more discerning, Mr. Hill, when listening only to iKooks.

I've written so many tutorials I can't count them Mr. Hill, and these
people you are listening to wrote how many? Did I hear you say zero?

Yes. Zero.
That would be correct.

Here's just one tutorial, Mr. Hill... which contains more value alone than
all the posts ever from all the iKooks combined in their entire lives.
*Tutorial: Creating one-tap shortcuts to turn on Apple Airtag unknown tracker alerts*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/R1KeMGhspYE/>

This tutorial, for example, also contains more value than all the iKooks
have ever added to any Usenet thread, combined, in their entire lives.
*Tutorial: Real world testing installing & backing up Android APKs 100% from Windows (Mac or Linux) over adb on USB*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/GcP5Y3p817U/>

Or this one:
*Tutorial: Installing open-source automatic call recording (ACR) on Android 13+ Samsung Galaxy*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/7mCHCktUuKw/>

Or this:
*Tutorial: How to set up sdcards for re-use & backup/restore*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/66KlzoEd3IA/>

Hell, just this post today of mine, Mr. Hill, contains more value than Alan
Baker & Alan Browne have ever added to any newsgroup post in their lives.
*What's the easiest way to manually switch the cell tower you are hotspotting/tethering to?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/xszxDu9quZ8/m/-MDdPACVAAAJ>

Please keep that in mind next time when you listen only to the iKooks.
--
The problem with the iKooks is they have never added any value to any
Usenet thread in their entire lives - all they can do is subtract value.

*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote

>> No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
>>
> I was referring to your "Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this
> newsgroup, Hemidactylus." creeper.

Hi Hemidactylus,
I read everything you post to this newsgroup, so it's not surprising to me
that you consider anyone who does, a creep. It says more about you than me.

All you iKooks are Dunning-Kruger first quartile, where nobody I've ever
gone to school with or worked with in the Silicon Valley was even close.

That's why you strange abnormally low-IQ iKooks interest me so much.

>> Such that you iKooks are so far to the left of the D-K first quartile that
>> you don't even realize how ignorant you are - as you think you're a genius.
>>
> So you make up some fictitious category "iKooks" lacking real application
> in the world and still cling to the illusory statistical artifact of the
> D-K graph.

Did you notice nobody would put Ant or badgolferman or Steve Scharf in the
iKook category. Does it ever occur to you why they're not iKooks & you are?

Even Hank Rogers isn't an iKook (as far as I can tell from what he writes).

The people who are iKooks are Your Name, nospam, Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan
Browne, Alan Baker, Snit, Connor Shannon, et al. They're all of abnormally
low IQ, but that alone isn't what makes you iKooks iKooks, Hemidactylus.

If you don't know, by now, what makes you an iKook, well then, that's proof
positive that I'm correct about everything I've said about you iKooks.

> Then you pretend to lecture me about anything. Silly ignorant kook.

I find it interesting that you are ashamed of what you are, Hemidactylus.

I feel sorry for you low-IQ iKooks because your whole life people told you
that you were stupid. They told you that everything you say is stupid.

And now I'm telling you the same things you've been told all along.

>> It's no longer shocking how utterly ignorant all iKooks are, Hemidactylus.
>>
>> Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term even as
>> it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in racing.
>
> How would you know?

Heh heh heh... How would I know that Alan Baker doesn't know the first
thing about anything? Have you _ever_ heard him say anything intelligent?

> Aren't you a mere dilettante at best?

Heh heh heh... like I said, Hemidactylus. I never claimed to be a racer.
But I do claim to have higher education.

Which means I understand what a catenary is.
And how it applies to racing.

By contrast, Alan Baker has never heard of a catenary in his entire life.
Even after desperately googling it, he still can't figure out what it is.

And yet, it's one of the most important racing terms there ever was.

> Maybe you're way out of your league.

That's what nospam told me when he claimed imaginary wi-fi debugging tools,
Hemidactylus. That's what Jolly Roger told me when he claimed Apple fully
supports older releases, Hemidactylus. That's what Alan Browne told me when
he claimed he's never noticed the walled garden so he says it can't exist.

Do you think you telling me that you're too stupid to understand a catenary
is your best way of trying to tell me that I'm not in your league?

You know you've been called stupid your entire life.
Do you think I don't know it?

> I don't trust you to convey much of anything accurately
> as you're just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a GED and a
> mail-order degree from a diploma mill.

And yet, the fact remains that the iKooks call people an 'it' because they
hate that those people tell them facts about Apple products that they hate.
--
What makes iKooks so interesting is that they don't even realize everything
they say tells me they've always been called stupid their entire lives.

On 2023-12-21 00:40, Wally J wrote:
> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>
>>> Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word
>>> "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?
>>
>> Oh great an obsessive stalker.
>
> No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
>
> Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if he
> desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing, particularly
> when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers depending on the track.

1. I don't race a "beemer" or a BMW. I race a 1998 Formula F Van Diemen
RF98 Honda.

>
> If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to hold
> yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms after all.

2. The challenge is on YOU, Arlen.

>
> Yet he doesn't.
> So he won't.

I'm pretty sure I know how YOU think it's significant...

....but you're wrong.

>
> Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term even as
> it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in racing.

It really isn't.

I've:

Attended 3 racing schools.

Raced for a decade.

Taught racing since 2017.

And no one has ever used that term.

Not once.

On 2023-12-21 06:22, Wally J wrote:
>> Aren't you a mere dilettante at best?
> Heh heh heh... like I said, Hemidactylus. I never claimed to be a racer.
> But I do claim to have higher education.
>
> Which means I understand what a catenary is.
> And how it applies to racing.
>
> By contrast, Alan Baker has never heard of a catenary in his entire life.

Sure I have. It's the curve that a chain or rope makes when it hangs
down between two elevated end points.

> Even after desperately googling it, he still can't figure out what it is.

I know exactly what it is.

>
> And yet, it's one of the most important racing terms there ever was.

Nope.

7 years of teaching

11 years of racing

Decades of studying racing and racing cars...

....and I have never once seen "catenary" used in relation to racing.

:-)

On 2023-12-21, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
> Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>>
>>>> Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with
>>>> the word "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of
>>>> racing"), shall we?
>>>
>>> Oh great an obsessive stalker.
>>
>> No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
>>
> I was referring to your “Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on
> this newsgroup, Hemidactylus.” creeper.
>>
>> Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if
>> he desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing,
>> particularly when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers
>> depending on the track.
>>
>> If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to
>> hold yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms
>> after all.
>>
>> Yet he doesn't. So he won't.
>>
>> *You think I don't know how ignorant all you iKooks are
>> Hemidactylus?*
>>
>> Whether or not you quote his replies, my point is that all you iKooks
>> are a. Low IQ b. Uneducated c. Ignorant
>>
>> Such that you iKooks are so far to the left of the D-K first quartile
>> that you don't even realize how ignorant you are - as you think
>> you're a genius.
>>
> So you make up some fictitious category “iKooks” lacking real
> application in the world and still cling to the illusory statistical
> artifact of the D-K graph. Then you pretend to lecture me about
> anything. Silly ignorant kook.

It's *always* projection with assholes like Arlen. They can't help but
project their own weaknesses onto others.

>> Which is the point.
>>
>> While I don't ever claim to be a racer, nor a teacher, I probably
>> already know more about racing than the iKook Alan Baker will know in
>> his life.
>>
>> That's literally how incredibly ignorant all you iKooks are
>> Hemidactylus. A. *Who is so ignorant to claim Apple fully patches
>> older releases?* Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Jolly Roger
>> says so all the time.
>>
>> B. *Who is so ignorant to claim the famed walled garden doesn't
>> exist?* Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Alan Browne says so all
>> the time.
>>
>> C. *Who is so ignorant to claim imaginary graphical WiFi strength
>> apps?* Nobody right? Yet the ignorant nospam fabricates the apps all
>> the time.
>>
>> It's no longer shocking how utterly ignorant all iKooks are,
>> Hemidactylus.
>>
>> Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term
>> even as it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in
>> racing.
>
> How would you know? Aren’t you a mere dilettante at best? Maybe you’re
> way out of your league. I don’t trust you to convey much of anything
> accurately as you’re just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a
> GED and a mail-order degree from a diploma mill.

Every single accusation from Arlen is a confession.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

On 2023-12-21, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2023-12-21 00:40, Wally J wrote:
>> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>>
>>>> Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with
>>>> the word "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of
>>>> racing"), shall we?
>>>
>>> Oh great an obsessive stalker.
>>
>> No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
>>
>> Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if
>> he desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing,
>> particularly when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers
>> depending on the track.
>
> 1. I don't race a "beemer" or a BMW. I race a 1998 Formula F Van
> Diemen RF98 Honda.
>
>>
>> If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to
>> hold yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms
>> after all.
>
> 2. The challenge is on YOU, Arlen.
>
>> Yet he doesn't. So he won't.
>
> I'm pretty sure I know how YOU think it's significant...
>
> ...but you're wrong.
>
>> Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term
>> even as it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in
>> racing.
>
> It really isn't.
>
> I've:
>
> Attended 3 racing schools.
>
> Raced for a decade.
>
> Taught racing since 2017.
>
> And no one has ever used that term.
>
> Not once.

The ignoramus picks such strange hills to die on... It's crystal clear
who the real "kook" is here. 🤣

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

> They can't help but project their own weaknesses onto others.

Actually it's Alan Browne, not me, who calls people bearing facts, an "it".

>> How would you know? Aren�t you a mere dilettante at best? Maybe you�re
>> way out of your league. I don�t trust you to convey much of anything
>> accurately as you�re just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a
>> GED and a mail-order degree from a diploma mill.
>
> Every single accusation from him is a confession.

My point about you iKooks is you're all Dunning-Kruger 1st quartile, JR.

That's why I brought up one of the most important racing terms, which I'm
sure that none of you low-IQ uneducated iKooks has any clue why it's so.

You iKooks can only google but it's like you googling the metric tensor.
The low IQ and lack of education means you can't understand what you find.

HINT: Anyone who took Physics would know EXACTLY how a catenary applies to
racing in such a way as to make it one of racing's most important terms.

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

> It's crystal clear who the real "kook" is here.

Hi Jolly Roger,

I agree with you. I'll agree with anyone who presents a sensible argument.
*Why do these rather strange iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/pSJ4OnxviWQ/m/KiMqn1w4AwAJ>

Alan Browne, for example, calls anyone bearing facts, an "it", which is his
way of making all inconvenient facts about Apple products go away for him.

Likewise, you claimed many times that Apple fully supports older releases.
Just as nospam constantly fabricated imaginary app store apps for iOS.

Alan Baker, admittedly the lowest IQ of all the iKooks, claimed many times
that you can't change something as trivial as the newsreader header line.
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>

And even now, the IQ 40 iKook Alan Baker "claims" to "teach racing" and yet
he doesn't know the simplest most basic of racing terms such as how a
catenary applies to racing circuits when it's the most critical component
in terms of racing strategy.

At this moment, Alan is furiously desperately googling & yet he still can't
comprehend what he sees because he has never taken Calculus or Physics.
--
He may as well google Christoffel Symbols or the Metric Tensor for all the
value his admittedly shockingly low IQ will afford him an understanding of.

On 2023-12-21 12:48, Wally J wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>> It's crystal clear who the real "kook" is here.
>
> Hi Jolly Roger,
>
> I agree with you. I'll agree with anyone who presents a sensible argument.
> *Why do these rather strange iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?*
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/pSJ4OnxviWQ/m/KiMqn1w4AwAJ>
>
> Alan Browne, for example, calls anyone bearing facts, an "it", which is his
> way of making all inconvenient facts about Apple products go away for him.
>
> Likewise, you claimed many times that Apple fully supports older releases.
> Just as nospam constantly fabricated imaginary app store apps for iOS.
>
> Alan Baker, admittedly the lowest IQ of all the iKooks, claimed many times
> that you can't change something as trivial as the newsreader header line.
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
>
> And even now, the IQ 40 iKook Alan Baker "claims" to "teach racing" and yet
> he doesn't know the simplest most basic of racing terms such as how a
> catenary applies to racing circuits when it's the most critical component
> in terms of racing strategy.

I claim I teach racing...

....because I do teach racing.

I've been a member of the Race Drivers Committee of the Sports Car Club
of British Columbia since 2017, and was the chairman this past year:

<https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>

>
> At this moment, Alan is furiously desperately googling & yet he still can't
> comprehend what he sees because he has never taken Calculus or Physics.

Ummmm... ...nope.

I studied both Calculus and Physics in both high school and university.

:-)

On 2023-12-21 12:35, Wally J wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>> They can't help but project their own weaknesses onto others.
>
> Actually it's Alan Browne, not me, who calls people bearing facts, an "it".
>
>>> How would you know? Aren┤ you a mere dilettante at best? Maybe you┴e
>>> way out of your league. I don┤ trust you to convey much of anything
>>> accurately as you┴e just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a
>>> GED and a mail-order degree from a diploma mill.
>>
>> Every single accusation from him is a confession.
>
> My point about you iKooks is you're all Dunning-Kruger 1st quartile, JR.
>
> That's why I brought up one of the most important racing terms, which I'm
> sure that none of you low-IQ uneducated iKooks has any clue why it's so.
>
> You iKooks can only google but it's like you googling the metric tensor.
> The low IQ and lack of education means you can't understand what you find.
>
> HINT: Anyone who took Physics would know EXACTLY how a catenary applies to
> racing in such a way as to make it one of racing's most important terms.

Hint:

Anyone who could explain its relevance would actually have done so by now.

As certified race driving instructor for 7 years, I can tell you it's
never come up.

:-)

On 2023-12-21, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>> It's crystal clear who the real "kook" is here.
>
> *Why do these rather strange iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?*

*Why does Arlen repeatedly call anyone who disagrees with him "iKooks"?*

Answer: Pure projection, as usual. Arlen, like any other narcissistic
bully, can't help but project his own insecurities and weaknesses onto
others. He calls everyone else a "kook" because he knows deep down
that *he* is a kook.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

>> *Why do these rather strange iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?*
>
> *Why does he repeatedly call anyone who disagrees with him "iKooks"?*

Heh heh heh... You're actually too stupid to realize how stupid you are.
Even though your entire life, people have been calling you stupid, JR.

You know, Jolly Roger, I've explained a million times what makes you an
iKook, and it's _not_ that someone disagrees with any assessments.

Hell, I'll agree with _anyone_ who presents a sensibly logical opinion.

What's interesting, Jolly Roger, is you don't know why you're an iKook.

HINT: You being an iKook has nothing to do with agreeing with anyone.
DOUBLEHINT: You claimed for years that Apple fully patched old releases.

> Answer: Pure projection, as usual. He, like any other narcissistic
> bully, can't help but project his own insecurities and weaknesses onto
> others. He calls everyone else a "kook" because he knows deep down
> that *he* is a kook.

Notice the hilarity of Jolly Roger calling someone else a "bully".

What's interesting is these iKooks are all to the far left of the
Dunning-Kruger first quartile such that they can't even fathom why they're
iKooks.
--
The simplest way to put it is they're too stupid to realize how incredibly
stupid they are as I told them a million times what makes them iKooks.

On 2023-12-22, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>>> *Why do these rather strange iKooks repeatedly call people an
>>> "it"?*
>>
>> *Why does he repeatedly call anyone who disagrees with him "iKooks"?*
>
> Heh heh heh...You're actually too stupid to realize how stupid you
> are.

Witness is Arlen's typical juvenile response to being called out.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

> typical juvenile response to being called out.

I feel sorry for you, Jolly Roger, just as I feel sorry for all disabled
people where your problem is clearly your lack of adult cognitive skills.

To wit...

The reason you're an iKook, Jolly Roger, has _nothing_ to do with
disagreements. Hell, I disagree with sms (Steve Scharf) all the time.

*Yet I don't call sms an iKook*

I think micky is a moron, Jolly Roger.

*Yet I don't call micky an iKook*

There's a reason you're an iKook, Jolly Roger.

What you need to do is look at yourself, Jolly Roger.
And figure out _why_ you're such a strange iKook.

I already told you why you're an iKook. Telling you again won't help you
figure it out, just like explaining what a catenary is to Alan Baker won't
help him with his brazen lies that he's a racecar driver and instructor.

There isn't anyone intelligent in racing circuits who doesn't know the
significance of the catenary in terms of teaching basic racing skills.
--
Your whole life people called you stupid - and - well - they were right.

Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>
> There isn't anyone intelligent in racing circuits who doesn't know the
> significance of the catenary in terms of teaching basic racing skills.

I’m not a racer, but I would guess it has something to do with calculating
how to enter and exit a curve. As a motorcycle rider there are some very
fine points of curve management one must learn to handle their bike safely.

On 2023-12-21 18:20, badgolferman wrote:
> Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>>
>> There isn't anyone intelligent in racing circuits who doesn't know the
>> significance of the catenary in terms of teaching basic racing skills.
>
> I’m not a racer, but I would guess it has something to do with calculating
> how to enter and exit a curve. As a motorcycle rider there are some very
> fine points of curve management one must learn to handle their bike safely.
>

I am a racer... ...for the last 11 years.

And before I was a racer, I took a 3-day race driving school with Skip
Barber (look them up) followed by 2 2-day advance courses.

And now I myself am a certified senior race driving instructor.

And I can back up everything I say.

In all that time, no one has ever referred to the line that a car takes
through a corner as being a catenary.

But Arlen is too cowardly to engage.