On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 21:36:50 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Incorrect. slat and pepper become ingredient's of the grill seasoning.

Once again Jenny admits salt and pepper are ingredients of the Big
Mac.

"Sqwertz" <sqwertzme@gmail.compost> wrote in message
news:1bhkc57fifhop$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:09:22 GMT, Frank wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:51:38 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:41:28 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:34:04 -0700, K Wills <fun@home.new> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>If you want peeople to beleive they are ingredient's of the big mac,
>>>>>>>>then you need to PROVE THEY ARE NOT INGRENDEIT'S OF THE GRILL
>>>>>>>>SEASONING.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ROFLMAO
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this an admission of defeat?
>>>>>
>>>>> No. You are unable to be honest and admit you lied all along.
>>>>
>>>>I love it when Jenny gets this desperate to hide his lying.
>>>
>>> It's funny, and sad, how Jenny will pile on more lies to his
>>> proven lies.
>>
>> It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>> proving the point to any interested reader.
>
> Sheeeit. This salt + pepper argument has only been going on for
> 4.5 years. They've been arguing "Private Property" for over 11
> years now.
>
> You'd think they'd get a clue by now.

The fact's don't lie, Steve.

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 03:46:27 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 14:22:28 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>>news:86tteip3blle3uanb1h901dt29r57l84k3@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 18:31:53 +0000, "DELL" <cshenk@yahoo.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>>>>> proving the point to any interested reader.
>>>>
>>>>Actually this newsgroup is painfully hard to find any content in. It's
>>>>just full of Elementary playground level behaviors. Must be hard to
>>>>get new users here (and keep them).
>>>
>>> Usenet is a dying medium. It's difficult to get new users for any
>>> group.
>>
>>
>>Usent is dieing becouse of troll's like YOU.
>
>Maybe if you stopped lying and posted on topic for once?

But Jenny's projection is so entertaining.

--
Don't worry about the world ending today... It's already tomorrow in
Australia. Unless you're in Australia... (then start worrying)

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 03:46:59 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 14:19:22 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"DELL" <cshenk@yahoo.net> wrote in message
>>news:Q9ScnXS8QsEEpHP5nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>>>> proving the point to any interested reader.
>>>
>>> Actually this newsgroup is painfully hard to find any content in. It's
>>> just full of Elementary playground level behaviors. Must be hard to
>>> get new users here (and keep them).
>>
>>99.99999999999999999% percent of newsgroups are compltely dead. At least
>>this one, has on-topic content.
>>
>
>This one is mostly your lies, and everyone pointing out your lies.

A few of us try to keep the conversations on-topic. But Jenny
always hijacks the threads to feed his NEED to lie.

--
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 03:47:18 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:47:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>>news:fr8rei52105qktuui9gc3rus38fhcpcsqn@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:37:34 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 22:29:45 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can't do that, kwills, becouse salt and pepper are NEVER ADDED
>>>>>separately to the big mac Patty's.
>>>>
>>>>Yes, salt and pepper are added to the Big Mac patties, making salt and
>>>>pepper ingredients of the Big Mac.
>>>
>>> Everyone, even McDonald's, says they are. Jenny is alone in the
>>> LIE that they are not.
>>
>> Mcdonald's says tha tingredient's of the big Mac are the Folowwing:
>>
>>Two all beef pattties,
>>Special Sauce,
>>cheese,
>>lettuce,
>>onions
>>pickles
>>on a sesame seed bun.
>>
>>NO MENTION OF SALT AND PEPER.
>>
>
>Once again, Jenny lies.

Ask him to point out EXACTLY when the salt and pepper are removed
from the patties. He's always run away from the question when I've
asked.

--
Even a broken clock can be right twice a day.

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:24:25 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Sqwertz" <sqwertzme@gmail.compost> wrote in message
>news:1bhkc57fifhop$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:09:22 GMT, Frank wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:51:38 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:41:28 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:34:04 -0700, K Wills <fun@home.new> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you want peeople to beleive they are ingredient's of the big mac,
>>>>>>>>>then you need to PROVE THEY ARE NOT INGRENDEIT'S OF THE GRILL
>>>>>>>>>SEASONING.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ROFLMAO
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this an admission of defeat?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. You are unable to be honest and admit you lied all along.
>>>>>
>>>>>I love it when Jenny gets this desperate to hide his lying.
>>>>
>>>> It's funny, and sad, how Jenny will pile on more lies to his
>>>> proven lies.
>>>
>>> It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>>> proving the point to any interested reader.
>>
>> Sheeeit. This salt + pepper argument has only been going on for
>> 4.5 years. They've been arguing "Private Property" for over 11
>> years now.
>>
>> You'd think they'd get a clue by now.
>
>The fact's don't lie, Steve.

True, Jenny. And you've been running from the facts for DECADES.

Here is the definition of private property:

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
person or company, rather than to a government.

Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
Is this definition correct?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

If your answer is no, supply a verifiable citation from another
dictionary which refutes this definition.

If you don't, we'll assume none exists, and you now admit that
restaurants are NOT owned by the government and are, therefore,
private property.

Put your verifiable cite here ----->

On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:46:23 -0700, K Wills <fun@home.new> wrote:

>On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 03:47:18 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:47:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>>>news:fr8rei52105qktuui9gc3rus38fhcpcsqn@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:37:34 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 22:29:45 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't do that, kwills, becouse salt and pepper are NEVER ADDED
>>>>>>separately to the big mac Patty's.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, salt and pepper are added to the Big Mac patties, making salt and
>>>>>pepper ingredients of the Big Mac.
>>>>
>>>> Everyone, even McDonald's, says they are. Jenny is alone in the
>>>> LIE that they are not.
>>>
>>> Mcdonald's says tha tingredient's of the big Mac are the Folowwing:
>>>
>>>Two all beef pattties,
>>>Special Sauce,
>>>cheese,
>>>lettuce,
>>>onions
>>>pickles
>>>on a sesame seed bun.
>>>
>>>NO MENTION OF SALT AND PEPER.
>>>
>>
>>Once again, Jenny lies.
>
> Ask him to point out EXACTLY when the salt and pepper are removed
>from the patties. He's always run away from the question when I've
>asked.

Actually, I believe he admitted they are NOT removed.

But who knows. It's hard to keep track of his lies.

Now his favorite exercise is to claim that the salt is not added when
the Big Mac is "constructed," as if that somehow negates the fact that
the patties ALREADY contain salt and pepper.

It's pretty funny.

On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:30:25 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:46:23 -0700, K Wills <fun@home.new> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 03:47:18 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:47:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>>>>news:fr8rei52105qktuui9gc3rus38fhcpcsqn@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:37:34 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 22:29:45 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't do that, kwills, becouse salt and pepper are NEVER ADDED
>>>>>>>separately to the big mac Patty's.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, salt and pepper are added to the Big Mac patties, making salt and
>>>>>>pepper ingredients of the Big Mac.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone, even McDonald's, says they are. Jenny is alone in the
>>>>> LIE that they are not.
>>>>
>>>> Mcdonald's says tha tingredient's of the big Mac are the Folowwing:
>>>>
>>>>Two all beef pattties,
>>>>Special Sauce,
>>>>cheese,
>>>>lettuce,
>>>>onions
>>>>pickles
>>>>on a sesame seed bun.
>>>>
>>>>NO MENTION OF SALT AND PEPER.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Once again, Jenny lies.
>>
>> Ask him to point out EXACTLY when the salt and pepper are removed
>>from the patties. He's always run away from the question when I've
>>asked.
>
>Actually, I believe he admitted they are NOT removed.
>

He has, but he's back to claiming there isn't any salt and pepper
on the patties.

>But who knows. It's hard to keep track of his lies.
>
>Now his favorite exercise is to claim that the salt is not added when
>the Big Mac is "constructed," as if that somehow negates the fact that
>the patties ALREADY contain salt and pepper.
>
>It's pretty funny.

It's allowing Jenny to feed his need to lie.

--
Even a broken clock can be right twice a day.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>Might I suggest you put a post it note on your monitor to help you
>>remember,
>>that 1.) SAlt and pepper are ingrendients of the grill seasoning, and that
>>
>>2.) grill seasoning is a ingredient of the patty, and tha t
>>
>>3.) the patty is one of the seven ingredients of teh big Mac.
>>Eliminating
>>all this confusion on your part would make this debate go a lot more
>>smoothly.
>>
>>Just do it. DO IT NOW. Put a post it note on yor monitor.
>
> Grill seasoning is salt and pepper. They add it to the patty, which
> becomes part of the Big Mac, hence S&P are Big Mac ingredients.

Foulty logic. the patty does not "become part of" the Big Mac. What DOES
happen is:

The entire of the patty, including all the indredient's of the patty,
becomes a INGREDIENT of the big mac, making the patty, a ingredient, along
with all the 6 other ingredient's, in thier entireity, A BIG MAC.

The grill seasoning remains ONLY as a a ingredeient of the patty, and does
not become a ingredient of the Big Mac, that only happens to the PATTY.

This is wht grill seasoning is NOT mentioned as a ingredinet by mcdonald's
either on the big mac homepage, or in the TV add jingle.

"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:2g7jjhlrr3v5s9v00qmiuvlginmuvu9ncb@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 01 Oct 2022 16:35:31 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>Might I suggest you put a post it note on your monitor to help you
>>>remember,
>>>that 1.) SAlt and pepper are ingrendients of the grill seasoning, and
>>>that
>>>
>>>2.) grill seasoning is a ingredient of the patty, and tha t
>>>
>>>3.) the patty is one of the seven ingredients of teh big Mac.
>>>Eliminating
>>>all this confusion on your part would make this debate go a lot more
>>>smoothly.
>>>
>>>Just do it. DO IT NOW. Put a post it note on yor monitor.
>>
>>Grill seasoning is salt and pepper. They add it to the patty, which
>>becomes part of the Big Mac, hence S&P are Big Mac ingredients.
>
> Clearly Jenny is claiming the salt and pepper (Grill seasoning)
> will be removed from the patties prior to being used in the Big Mac.

No Kwills, I never claimed that. Stop lying. I said the exact OPPOSITE.
the grill seasoning STAYS, as a ingredinet of the patty. ONLY the patty
becomes a ingredient of the Big Mac. And mcdonald's AD TV jingle OBVIOUSLY
agree's with that FACT, or S&P would have been incdulded in the jingle.

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:39:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>>>Might I suggest you put a post it note on your monitor to help you
>>>remember,
>>>that 1.) SAlt and pepper are ingrendients of the grill seasoning, and that
>>>
>>>2.) grill seasoning is a ingredient of the patty, and tha t
>>>
>>>3.) the patty is one of the seven ingredients of teh big Mac.
>>>Eliminating
>>>all this confusion on your part would make this debate go a lot more
>>>smoothly.
>>>
>>>Just do it. DO IT NOW. Put a post it note on yor monitor.
>>
>> Grill seasoning is salt and pepper. They add it to the patty, which
>> becomes part of the Big Mac, hence S&P are Big Mac ingredients.
>
>Foulty logic. the patty does not "become part of" the Big Mac. What DOES
>happen is:

Yes, dufus, the patty becomes part of the Big Mac.

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:41:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>news:2g7jjhlrr3v5s9v00qmiuvlginmuvu9ncb@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2022 16:35:31 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>Might I suggest you put a post it note on your monitor to help you
>>>>remember,
>>>>that 1.) SAlt and pepper are ingrendients of the grill seasoning, and
>>>>that
>>>>
>>>>2.) grill seasoning is a ingredient of the patty, and tha t
>>>>
>>>>3.) the patty is one of the seven ingredients of teh big Mac.
>>>>Eliminating
>>>>all this confusion on your part would make this debate go a lot more
>>>>smoothly.
>>>>
>>>>Just do it. DO IT NOW. Put a post it note on yor monitor.
>>>
>>>Grill seasoning is salt and pepper. They add it to the patty, which
>>>becomes part of the Big Mac, hence S&P are Big Mac ingredients.
>>
>> Clearly Jenny is claiming the salt and pepper (Grill seasoning)
>> will be removed from the patties prior to being used in the Big Mac.
>
>No Kwills, I never claimed that. Stop lying. I said the exact OPPOSITE.
>the grill seasoning STAYS, as a ingredinet of the patty.

Then salt and pepper are ingredients of the Big Mac. They never stop
being ingredients.

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:39:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>>>Might I suggest you put a post it note on your monitor to help you
>>>remember,
>>>that 1.) SAlt and pepper are ingrendients of the grill seasoning, and that
>>>
>>>2.) grill seasoning is a ingredient of the patty, and tha t
>>>
>>>3.) the patty is one of the seven ingredients of teh big Mac.
>>>Eliminating
>>>all this confusion on your part would make this debate go a lot more
>>>smoothly.
>>>
>>>Just do it. DO IT NOW. Put a post it note on yor monitor.
>>
>> Grill seasoning is salt and pepper. They add it to the patty, which
>> becomes part of the Big Mac, hence S&P are Big Mac ingredients.
>
>Foulty logic. the patty does not "become part of" the Big Mac. What DOES
>happen is:
>
>The entire of the patty, including all the indredient's of the patty,
>becomes a INGREDIENT of the big mac, making the patty, a ingredient, along
>with all the 6 other ingredient's, in thier entireity, A BIG MAC.
>
>The grill seasoning remains ONLY as a a ingredeient of the patty, and does
>not become a ingredient of the Big Mac, that only happens to the PATTY.
>
>This is wht grill seasoning is NOT mentioned as a ingredinet by mcdonald's
>either on the big mac homepage, or in the TV add jingle.
>

Best contact the CEO of McDonald's since the company states,
quite openly, that grill season IS an ingredient of the Big Mac.
Also, you openly admitted you LIED about this matter. Clearly
you're upset with yourself for your accidental admission.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:41:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>news:2g7jjhlrr3v5s9v00qmiuvlginmuvu9ncb@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2022 16:35:31 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>Might I suggest you put a post it note on your monitor to help you
>>>>remember,
>>>>that 1.) SAlt and pepper are ingrendients of the grill seasoning, and
>>>>that
>>>>
>>>>2.) grill seasoning is a ingredient of the patty, and tha t
>>>>
>>>>3.) the patty is one of the seven ingredients of teh big Mac.
>>>>Eliminating
>>>>all this confusion on your part would make this debate go a lot more
>>>>smoothly.
>>>>
>>>>Just do it. DO IT NOW. Put a post it note on yor monitor.
>>>
>>>Grill seasoning is salt and pepper. They add it to the patty, which
>>>becomes part of the Big Mac, hence S&P are Big Mac ingredients.
>>
>> Clearly Jenny is claiming the salt and pepper (Grill seasoning)
>> will be removed from the patties prior to being used in the Big Mac.
>
>No Kwills, I never claimed that. Stop lying. I said the exact OPPOSITE.

So, again you admit salt and pepper ARE ingredients of the Big
Mac. Just as McDonald's states.

>the grill seasoning STAYS, as a ingredinet of the patty. ONLY the patty
>becomes a ingredient of the Big Mac. And mcdonald's AD TV jingle OBVIOUSLY
>agree's with that FACT, or S&P would have been incdulded in the jingle.

So now you're back to claiming salt and pepper are removed.
You can't maintain the same position for two paragraphs.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 14:31:07 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:39:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>>>>Might I suggest you put a post it note on your monitor to help you
>>>>remember,
>>>>that 1.) SAlt and pepper are ingrendients of the grill seasoning, and that
>>>>
>>>>2.) grill seasoning is a ingredient of the patty, and tha t
>>>>
>>>>3.) the patty is one of the seven ingredients of teh big Mac.
>>>>Eliminating
>>>>all this confusion on your part would make this debate go a lot more
>>>>smoothly.
>>>>
>>>>Just do it. DO IT NOW. Put a post it note on yor monitor.
>>>
>>> Grill seasoning is salt and pepper. They add it to the patty, which
>>> becomes part of the Big Mac, hence S&P are Big Mac ingredients.
>>
>>Foulty logic. the patty does not "become part of" the Big Mac. What DOES
>>happen is:
>
>Yes, dufus, the patty becomes part of the Big Mac.

He knows. But Jenny cannot be honest. Not intentionally.

--
Don't worry about the world ending today... It's already tomorrow in
Australia. Unless you're in Australia... (then start worrying)

On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 14:31:43 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:41:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>news:2g7jjhlrr3v5s9v00qmiuvlginmuvu9ncb@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2022 16:35:31 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>Might I suggest you put a post it note on your monitor to help you
>>>>>remember,
>>>>>that 1.) SAlt and pepper are ingrendients of the grill seasoning, and
>>>>>that
>>>>>
>>>>>2.) grill seasoning is a ingredient of the patty, and tha t
>>>>>
>>>>>3.) the patty is one of the seven ingredients of teh big Mac.
>>>>>Eliminating
>>>>>all this confusion on your part would make this debate go a lot more
>>>>>smoothly.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just do it. DO IT NOW. Put a post it note on yor monitor.
>>>>
>>>>Grill seasoning is salt and pepper. They add it to the patty, which
>>>>becomes part of the Big Mac, hence S&P are Big Mac ingredients.
>>>
>>> Clearly Jenny is claiming the salt and pepper (Grill seasoning)
>>> will be removed from the patties prior to being used in the Big Mac.
>>
>>No Kwills, I never claimed that. Stop lying. I said the exact OPPOSITE.
>>the grill seasoning STAYS, as a ingredinet of the patty.
>
>Then salt and pepper are ingredients of the Big Mac. They never stop
>being ingredients.

Jenny goes back and forth so often, he's risking whiplash.

--
I suffer from chronic apathy.
I was going to go see a doctor about it, but I didn't really care.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5gk5gid6fk114bvjp4st9d90q54r66kgmu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:24:25 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Sqwertz" <sqwertzme@gmail.compost> wrote in message
>>news:1bhkc57fifhop$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:09:22 GMT, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:51:38 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:41:28 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:34:04 -0700, K Wills <fun@home.new> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>If you want peeople to beleive they are ingredient's of the big
>>>>>>>>>>mac,
>>>>>>>>>>then you need to PROVE THEY ARE NOT INGRENDEIT'S OF THE GRILL
>>>>>>>>>>SEASONING.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ROFLMAO
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is this an admission of defeat?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. You are unable to be honest and admit you lied all along.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I love it when Jenny gets this desperate to hide his lying.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's funny, and sad, how Jenny will pile on more lies to his
>>>>> proven lies.
>>>>
>>>> It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>>>> proving the point to any interested reader.
>>>
>>> Sheeeit. This salt + pepper argument has only been going on for
>>> 4.5 years. They've been arguing "Private Property" for over 11
>>> years now.
>>>
>>> You'd think they'd get a clue by now.
>>
>>The fact's don't lie, Steve.
>
> True, Jenny. And you've been running from the facts for DECADES.
>
>
> Here is the definition of private property:
>
> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
> something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
> person or company, rather than to a government.
>
> Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
> Is this definition correct?
>
> [ ] Yes
> [ ] No

Nad as I have answered this MANY time's over the year's, NO that deficnation
is not correct. this is AMERICA, not england.

"DELL" <cshenk@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:BvacncHZaMxNfm35nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>>
>> "DELL" <cshenk@yahoo.net> wrote in message
>> news:Q9ScnXS8QsEEpHP5nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> > Frank wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > > It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>> > > proving the point to any interested reader.
>> >
>> > Actually this newsgroup is painfully hard to find any content in.
>> > It's just full of Elementary playground level behaviors. Must be
>> > hard to get new users here (and keep them).
>>
>> 99.99999999999999999% percent of newsgroups are compltely dead. At
>> least this one, has on-topic content.
>
> Not that many but yes, lots of dead-wood out there. I'm in several of
> them. This one has only a little on-topic discussion.

Oh bullshit thanks to my leadership this is one of the top on-topic
newsgroup's on Usenet.

On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 01:47:22 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"DELL" <cshenk@yahoo.net> wrote in message
>news:BvacncHZaMxNfm35nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "DELL" <cshenk@yahoo.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Q9ScnXS8QsEEpHP5nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> > Frank wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>>> > > proving the point to any interested reader.
>>> >
>>> > Actually this newsgroup is painfully hard to find any content in.
>>> > It's just full of Elementary playground level behaviors. Must be
>>> > hard to get new users here (and keep them).
>>>
>>> 99.99999999999999999% percent of newsgroups are compltely dead. At
>>> least this one, has on-topic content.
>>
>> Not that many but yes, lots of dead-wood out there. I'm in several of
>> them. This one has only a little on-topic discussion.
>
>Oh bullshit thanks to my leadership this is one of the top on-topic
>newsgroup's on Usenet.
>

Q. Is there a leader of the group?
A. The group is in the alt.x hierarchy, so there is no leader or
person in charge, and there never has been.

http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/a.f.f-f_FAQ.html

On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 01:48:59 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5gk5gid6fk114bvjp4st9d90q54r66kgmu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:24:25 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Sqwertz" <sqwertzme@gmail.compost> wrote in message
>>>news:1bhkc57fifhop$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:09:22 GMT, Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:51:38 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:41:28 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:34:04 -0700, K Wills <fun@home.new> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If you want peeople to beleive they are ingredient's of the big
>>>>>>>>>>>mac,
>>>>>>>>>>>then you need to PROVE THEY ARE NOT INGRENDEIT'S OF THE GRILL
>>>>>>>>>>>SEASONING.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ROFLMAO
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this an admission of defeat?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. You are unable to be honest and admit you lied all along.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I love it when Jenny gets this desperate to hide his lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's funny, and sad, how Jenny will pile on more lies to his
>>>>>> proven lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>>>>> proving the point to any interested reader.
>>>>
>>>> Sheeeit. This salt + pepper argument has only been going on for
>>>> 4.5 years. They've been arguing "Private Property" for over 11
>>>> years now.
>>>>
>>>> You'd think they'd get a clue by now.
>>>
>>>The fact's don't lie, Steve.
>>
>> True, Jenny. And you've been running from the facts for DECADES.
>>
>>
>> Here is the definition of private property:
>>
>> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
>> something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
>> person or company, rather than to a government.
>>
>> Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
>> Is this definition correct?
>>
>> [ ] Yes
>> [ ] No
>
>
>Nad as I have answered this MANY time's over the year's,

Another lie from Jenny.

>NO that deficnation
>is not correct. this is AMERICA, not england.

Once again, Jenny fails to answer the question and provide a
verifiable definition from *ANY* dictionary. Then he runs away.

[crickets]

On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 01:47:22 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"DELL" <cshenk@yahoo.net> wrote in message
>news:BvacncHZaMxNfm35nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>>> "DELL" <cshenk@yahoo.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Q9ScnXS8QsEEpHP5nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> > Frank wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>>> > > proving the point to any interested reader.
>>> >
>>> > Actually this newsgroup is painfully hard to find any content in.
>>> > It's just full of Elementary playground level behaviors. Must be
>>> > hard to get new users here (and keep them).
>>>
>>> 99.99999999999999999% percent of newsgroups are compltely dead. At
>>> least this one, has on-topic content.
>>
>> Not that many but yes, lots of dead-wood out there. I'm in several of
>> them. This one has only a little on-topic discussion.
>
>Oh bullshit thanks to my leadership this is one of the top on-topic
>newsgroup's on Usenet.

You rarely post on-topic, Jenny. Klaus and I are the ones who
post the most on-topic articles. After us, Frank posts the most
on-topic articles.
You don't even make it to the top three.
Further, there is no leader. If there were, it would be Klaus,
since the vote to make him the leader was unanimous. True, the vote
was symbolic only, as there is no leader.
And, as President of the Leadership Comity, I removed you as any
sort of leader FOR LIFE. This was, and is, also symbolic since, again,
there is no leader.
If your NEED to lie continues to force you to lie about this
matter, know that your lying will continued to be exposed.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 01:48:59 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5gk5gid6fk114bvjp4st9d90q54r66kgmu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:24:25 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Sqwertz" <sqwertzme@gmail.compost> wrote in message
>>>news:1bhkc57fifhop$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:09:22 GMT, Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:51:38 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:41:28 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:34:04 -0700, K Wills <fun@home.new> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If you want peeople to beleive they are ingredient's of the big
>>>>>>>>>>>mac,
>>>>>>>>>>>then you need to PROVE THEY ARE NOT INGRENDEIT'S OF THE GRILL
>>>>>>>>>>>SEASONING.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ROFLMAO
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this an admission of defeat?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. You are unable to be honest and admit you lied all along.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I love it when Jenny gets this desperate to hide his lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's funny, and sad, how Jenny will pile on more lies to his
>>>>>> proven lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>>>>> proving the point to any interested reader.
>>>>
>>>> Sheeeit. This salt + pepper argument has only been going on for
>>>> 4.5 years. They've been arguing "Private Property" for over 11
>>>> years now.
>>>>
>>>> You'd think they'd get a clue by now.
>>>
>>>The fact's don't lie, Steve.
>>
>> True, Jenny. And you've been running from the facts for DECADES.
>>
>> Here is the definition of private property:
>>
>> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
>> something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
>> person or company, rather than to a government.
>>
>> Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
>> Is this definition correct?
>>
>> [ ] Yes
>> [ ] No
>
>
>Nad as I have answered this MANY time's over the year's, NO that deficnation
>is not correct.

LIAR!

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/private_property
Private property refers to the ownership of property by private
parties - essentially anyone or anything other than the government.
Private property may consist of real estate, buildings, objects,
intellectual property (copyright, patent, trademark, and trade
secrets).

>this is AMERICA, not england.
>

And what does that have to do with anything? As the link I've
posted above PROVES, the definition isn't legally different.
You could always LIE and state Wex isn't an accurate source. You
will have to, since you will not be able to be honest about the
matter.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

On Sun, 08 Oct 2023 04:29:19 -0700, KWills <fun@home.new> wrote:

>On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 01:48:59 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:5gk5gid6fk114bvjp4st9d90q54r66kgmu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:24:25 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Sqwertz" <sqwertzme@gmail.compost> wrote in message
>>>>news:1bhkc57fifhop$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:09:22 GMT, Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:51:38 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:41:28 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:34:04 -0700, K Wills <fun@home.new> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>If you want peeople to beleive they are ingredient's of the big
>>>>>>>>>>>>mac,
>>>>>>>>>>>>then you need to PROVE THEY ARE NOT INGRENDEIT'S OF THE GRILL
>>>>>>>>>>>>SEASONING.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ROFLMAO
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is this an admission of defeat?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No. You are unable to be honest and admit you lied all along.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I love it when Jenny gets this desperate to hide his lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's funny, and sad, how Jenny will pile on more lies to his
>>>>>>> proven lies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's even sadder that you would beat this dead horse long past
>>>>>> proving the point to any interested reader.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sheeeit. This salt + pepper argument has only been going on for
>>>>> 4.5 years. They've been arguing "Private Property" for over 11
>>>>> years now.
>>>>>
>>>>> You'd think they'd get a clue by now.
>>>>
>>>>The fact's don't lie, Steve.
>>>
>>> True, Jenny. And you've been running from the facts for DECADES.
>>>
>>> Here is the definition of private property:
>>>
>>> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
>>> something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
>>> person or company, rather than to a government.
>>>
>>> Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
>>> Is this definition correct?
>>>
>>> [ ] Yes
>>> [ ] No
>>
>>
>>Nad as I have answered this MANY time's over the year's, NO that deficnation
>>is not correct.
>
> LIAR!
>
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/private_property
>Private property refers to the ownership of property by private
>parties - essentially anyone or anything other than the government.
>Private property may consist of real estate, buildings, objects,
>intellectual property (copyright, patent, trademark, and trade
>secrets).
>
>>this is AMERICA, not england.
>>
>
> And what does that have to do with anything? As the link I've
>posted above PROVES, the definition isn't legally different.
> You could always LIE and state Wex isn't an accurate source. You
>will have to, since you will not be able to be honest about the
>matter.

Jenny is trying to tell us that because the definition comes from the
Cambridge dictionary, it's only valid in England.

This has probably already been explained to him, though, so, he's just
lying like he always does.

On Sun, 08 Oct 2023 05:24:49 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>> Here is the definition of private property:
>>>>
>>>> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
>>>> something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
>>>> person or company, rather than to a government.
>>>>
>>>> Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
>>>> Is this definition correct?
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Yes
>>>> [ ] No
>>>
>>>Nad as I have answered this MANY time's over the year's, NO that deficnation
>>>is not correct.
>>
>> LIAR!
>>
>>https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/private_property
>>Private property refers to the ownership of property by private
>>parties - essentially anyone or anything other than the government.
>>Private property may consist of real estate, buildings, objects,
>>intellectual property (copyright, patent, trademark, and trade
>>secrets).
>>
>>>this is AMERICA, not england.
>>
>> And what does that have to do with anything? As the link I've
>>posted above PROVES, the definition isn't legally different.
>> You could always LIE and state Wex isn't an accurate source. You
>>will have to, since you will not be able to be honest about the
>>matter.
>
>Jenny is trying to tell us that because the definition comes from the
>Cambridge dictionary, it's only valid in England.
>
>This has probably already been explained to him, though, so, he's just
>lying like he always does.

I've cited a legal definition from the United States. Any claim
from Jenny from this point on that it is NOT the correct definition
will be nothing more than his feeding his NEED to lie.

--
If Mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy.
If Daddy ain't happy, don't nobody care!

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vcjhjhlu812v2oqq69sol0ugd3d4cvcblj@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 17:10:50 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:6nt1fhpgfmo1lphh97gvq3ueqh35i9p30j@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 00:05:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:eis6chhhu5psvqfkb82q3dtn7r35crrhre@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 17:46:25 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You know, I had my doubts when Jenny proclaimed that fast food CEOs
>>>>>>> read
>>>>>>> this group because I didn't see where they would get value.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Scott you moron, I never said that mcdonalds CEOs read this newsgroup.
>>>>>>If
>>>>>>you were paying attnetion, what I said was fast-food CORPARATE
>>>>>>MONITORS
>>>>>>THIS
>>>>>>NEWSGROUP.
>>>>>
>>>>> And of course, Jenny has never offered any proof to support this lie.
>>>>
>>>>I have posted proof of this many time's.
>>>
>>> A lie. You have NEVER posted proof. Not one, single time.
>>>
>>>>There are MULTIPLE occiosions
>>>>where a idea was discussed here, and then later introduced by various
>>>>fast-doos restounrat's.
>>>
>>> That's not proof. You've been told this. You lie when you make this
>>> claim.
>>
>>YES IT IS PROOF. AND IT HAS HAPPENED MULTIPLE TIME'S WHICH CONFIRMS THAT
>>IT
>>IS PROOF.
>>
>
> No, you have never furnished any proof. You are lying again.
>
> Back in 1974 I painted my windshield wipers black, when all car makers
> were using silver.

Only a fucking idiot would waste time painting a fucking WINDSHIELD WIPER.

Therefore, your argument is invalid.