"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2k7rah5r6jvvjgnhra6tm9kt55u911qlb2@4ax.com...

> It's owned by the government, therefore, it's public property.
>
> See how stupid you are, Jenny?

Is the White House owned by the government? is the white how in it's
entirety public property?

Oh I forgot how much you struggle with yes/no questrions, I don't expect you
to be able to answer that.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1p7rahdfpbg2la4fn0hitsa4it7vuaoist@4ax.com...
> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
> when he wrote the following:
>
>
>>
>>"Burgermeister ??" <burgermeister@cultnix.org> wrote in message
>>news:3w8eK.10021$RWva.8132@fx96.iad...
>>> On Mon, 09 May 2022 04:15:57 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2022 20:14:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>A lot of people have been asking lately whether or not Disney land is
>>>>>public or private property.
>>>>>
>>>>>After much thought, I have decided that it is PRIVATE property, due to
>>>>>the fact that there are gate's, and you have to pay a admission fee.
>>>>
>>>> It would be private property regardless of gates and admission fee,
>>>> since it is not owned by the government.
>>>>
>>>>>This in my perosnal opinion makes it PRIVATE property.
>>>>
>>>> That's because-- quite frankly-- you're a dumb ass.
>>>>
>>>>> But, as open minded
>>>>>as I always am, this is now open to debate as long as people use fact's
>>>>>and logic. If it is determined that I am wrong about it being private,
>>>>>I will promptly admit it and change the official postion.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the definition of private property:
>>>>
>>>> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
>>>> something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
>>>> person or company, rather than to a government.
>>>>
>>>> Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
>>>> Is this definition correct?
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Yes [ ] No
>>
>>
>>
> [crickets.wav] (� 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>>
>>
>>
>>>> If your answer is no, supply a verifiable citation from another
>>>> dictionary which refutes this definition.
>>>>
>>>> If you don't, we'll assume none exists, and you now admit that
>>>> restaurants are NOT owned by the government and are, therefore, private
>>>> property.
>>>>
>>>> Put your verifiable cite here ----->
>>
>>
>>
> [crickets.wav] (� 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>>
>>
>>
>>> I think this is one of the most amazing semantics arguments ever
>>> posted. It's epic.
>>
>>What are you talking about.
>>
>
> And Jenny runs away again

From your blathering, yes.

On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:25:24 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ph7rah1em5eka2il0lc21ms7g10ho6abi5@4ax.com...
>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>> when he wrote the following:
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:1sth7hp84gk74nmd6rec6tejbi8h03iau8@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2022 20:14:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>A lot of people have been asking lately whether or not Disney land is
>>>>>public
>>>>>or private property.
>>>>>
>>>>>After much thought, I have decided that it is PRIVATE property, due to
>>>>>the
>>>>>fact that there are gate's, and you have to pay a admission fee.
>>>>
>>>> It would be private property regardless of gates and admission fee,
>>>> since it is not owned by the government.
>>>
>>>AS WE ALREADY DISCUSSED, GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
>>>
>>
>> As usual, you are lying. Government ownership has everything to do
>> with if a property is public property or private property.
>
>No, Governmet ownership only determines WHO OWNS IT, not if it is public or
>now.

Yes, Jenny. If it's owned by the government, it's ALWAYS pubic
property.

>Wow, it's been a while since we've been to this part of the circle before,
>klous. Sure has been a fun trip (not).

Again:

Here is the definition of private property:

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
person or company, rather than to a government.

Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
Is this definition correct?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

If your answer is no, supply a verifiable citation from another
dictionary which refutes this definition.

If you don't, we'll assume none exists, and you now admit that
restaurants are NOT owned by the government and are, therefore,
private property.

Put your verifiable cite here ----->

On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:27:00 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:2k7rah5r6jvvjgnhra6tm9kt55u911qlb2@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>> It's owned by the government, therefore, it's public property.
>>
>> See how stupid you are, Jenny?
>
>Is the White House owned by the government?

Yes. Didn't you know this?

> is the white how in it's entirety public property?

Every square inch is public property.

>Oh I forgot how much you struggle with yes/no questrions, I don't expect you
>to be able to answer that.

Yes or no: Have you stopped beating off at the dinner table?

Yes or no, Jenny.
------------------------------------------

When will Jenny confess that he lied when he made this claim?

:JENNY_LIE: Many week's [sic] ago, he [Kwills] personally
:JENNY_LIE:emailed me after I refused his re-admission,
:JENNY_LIE:and he admitted he was in teh [sic] wrong and
:JENNY_LIE:that he is just a troll. He also suggested
:JENNY_LIE:I killfile [sic] Klous [sic] as well, which prove's
:JENNY_LIE: [sic] how much respect for the killfiling [sic] program.

On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:27:30 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1p7rahdfpbg2la4fn0hitsa4it7vuaoist@4ax.com...
>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>> when he wrote the following:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>"Burgermeister ??" <burgermeister@cultnix.org> wrote in message
>>>news:3w8eK.10021$RWva.8132@fx96.iad...
>>>> On Mon, 09 May 2022 04:15:57 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2022 20:14:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>A lot of people have been asking lately whether or not Disney land is
>>>>>>public or private property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>After much thought, I have decided that it is PRIVATE property, due to
>>>>>>the fact that there are gate's, and you have to pay a admission fee.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be private property regardless of gates and admission fee,
>>>>> since it is not owned by the government.
>>>>>
>>>>>>This in my perosnal opinion makes it PRIVATE property.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's because-- quite frankly-- you're a dumb ass.
>>>>>
>>>>>> But, as open minded
>>>>>>as I always am, this is now open to debate as long as people use fact's
>>>>>>and logic. If it is determined that I am wrong about it being private,
>>>>>>I will promptly admit it and change the official postion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the definition of private property:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
>>>>> something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
>>>>> person or company, rather than to a government.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
>>>>> Is this definition correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] Yes [ ] No
>
>
>
[crickets.wav] (© 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>
>
>
>>>
>> [crickets.wav] (© 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> If your answer is no, supply a verifiable citation from another
>>>>> dictionary which refutes this definition.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you don't, we'll assume none exists, and you now admit that
>>>>> restaurants are NOT owned by the government and are, therefore, private
>>>>> property.
>
>
>
[crickets.wav] (© 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>
>
>
>>>>> Put your verifiable cite here ----->
>
>
>
[crickets.wav] (© 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>
>
>
>>>
>> [crickets.wav] (© 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I think this is one of the most amazing semantics arguments ever
>>>> posted. It's epic.
>>>
>>>What are you talking about.
>>>
>>
>> And Jenny runs away again
>
>From your

....accurate and fact-based argument.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:268rahtk93c37uml183316uaucvbn1bdlj@4ax.com...
> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
> when he wrote the following:
>
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:913l7hdn92o49d25fcqi7t0cdu6adi907i@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>>>> But Jenny is a liar, and he will continue to lie.
>>>>
>>>>I don't think Jerry is intentionally telling his mistruths.
>>>>
>>>>He may be entirely and undoubtely _wrong_ -- but if there is no intent
>>>>to deceive, does that make him a liar?
>>>
>>> I may have mentioned this before, but it's *possible* he has the
>>> intelligence quotient of a chipmunk. That, coupled with whatever
>>> mental aberrations consume him day and night, could result in the
>>> existence of someone who is basically unteachable or incapable of
>>> learning.
>>
>> Klous, the reason you think I'm lying when I'm actually NOT [..]
>
> Jenny, the reason I think you're lying is simple.
>
> You're lying.

Wrong. Your ACCUSING me of lieying. That's becouse it's much easier for
you to screach LIAR then it is to accept realty. That's YOUR problem, not
mine.

On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 13:14:55 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:268rahtk93c37uml183316uaucvbn1bdlj@4ax.com...
>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>> when he wrote the following:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:913l7hdn92o49d25fcqi7t0cdu6adi907i@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> But Jenny is a liar, and he will continue to lie.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think Jerry is intentionally telling his mistruths.
>>>>>
>>>>>He may be entirely and undoubtely _wrong_ -- but if there is no intent
>>>>>to deceive, does that make him a liar?
>>>>
>>>> I may have mentioned this before, but it's *possible* he has the
>>>> intelligence quotient of a chipmunk. That, coupled with whatever
>>>> mental aberrations consume him day and night, could result in the
>>>> existence of someone who is basically unteachable or incapable of
>>>> learning.
>>>
>>> Klous, the reason you think I'm lying when I'm actually NOT [..]
>>
>> Jenny, the reason I think you're lying is simple.
>>
>> You're lying.
>
>Wrong. Your ACCUSING me of lieying.

That's because you *are* a liar, Jenny.

> That's becouse it's much easier for
>you to screach LIAR then it is to accept realty.

But it's much more FUN to point out that you're a liar when you lie.
ANd you can't STOP lying.

> That's YOUR problem, not
>mine.

I find your CONSTANT lying entertaining, Jenny.

------------------------------------------

When will Jenny confess that he lied when he made this claim?

:JENNY_LIE: Many week's [sic] ago, he [Kwills] personally
:JENNY_LIE:emailed me after I refused his re-admission,
:JENNY_LIE:and he admitted he was in teh [sic] wrong and
:JENNY_LIE:that he is just a troll. He also suggested
:JENNY_LIE:I killfile [sic] Klous [sic] as well, which prove's
:JENNY_LIE: [sic] how much respect for the killfiling [sic] program.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c2lgdh1lhv8jh08pddft6p8l5eint21569@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:25:24 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:ph7rah1em5eka2il0lc21ms7g10ho6abi5@4ax.com...
>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:1sth7hp84gk74nmd6rec6tejbi8h03iau8@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2022 20:14:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>A lot of people have been asking lately whether or not Disney land is
>>>>>>public
>>>>>>or private property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>After much thought, I have decided that it is PRIVATE property, due to
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>fact that there are gate's, and you have to pay a admission fee.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be private property regardless of gates and admission fee,
>>>>> since it is not owned by the government.
>>>>
>>>>AS WE ALREADY DISCUSSED, GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
>>>>
>>>
>>> As usual, you are lying. Government ownership has everything to do
>>> with if a property is public property or private property.
>>
>>No, Governmet ownership only determines WHO OWNS IT, not if it is public
>>or
>>now.
>
> Yes, Jenny. If it's owned by the government, it's ALWAYS pubic
> property.

So your saying that area 51 is public property? How about teh sensitive
area's of teh Pentagon? Or the president's bedroom? Your honestly trying
to say that these area's are PUBLIC?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 02:25:48 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:c2lgdh1lhv8jh08pddft6p8l5eint21569@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:25:24 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:ph7rah1em5eka2il0lc21ms7g10ho6abi5@4ax.com...
>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:1sth7hp84gk74nmd6rec6tejbi8h03iau8@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2022 20:14:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A lot of people have been asking lately whether or not Disney land is
>>>>>>>public
>>>>>>>or private property.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>After much thought, I have decided that it is PRIVATE property, due to
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>fact that there are gate's, and you have to pay a admission fee.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would be private property regardless of gates and admission fee,
>>>>>> since it is not owned by the government.
>>>>>
>>>>>AS WE ALREADY DISCUSSED, GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As usual, you are lying. Government ownership has everything to do
>>>> with if a property is public property or private property.
>>>
>>>No, Governmet ownership only determines WHO OWNS IT, not if it is public
>>>or
>>>now.
>>
>> Yes, Jenny. If it's owned by the government, it's ALWAYS pubic
>> property.
>
>
>So your saying that area 51 is public property?

Yes, Jenny, Area 51 is Public Property.

>How about teh sensitive area's of teh Pentagon?

Yes, Jenny, the most sensitive and secret areas of the Pentagon are
Public Property.

>Or the president's bedroom?

Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.

So is...
The inside of Fort Knox
CIA Headquarters
The armory at Fort Bragg
The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
Force Base, North Dakota.

All public property.

>Your honestly trying
>to say that these area's are PUBLIC?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Ah! I see why you are confused! Yes, Jenny, I am HONESTLY saying these
are examples of public property.

Again:

Public property refers to property owned by the government (or its
agency), rather than by a private individual or a company.
https://www.law.cornell.edu

Someone being HONEST is obviously abhorrent and execrable for you.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8nbjdht8l32ni01r2b1rghsrt3udejq1mb@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 13:14:55 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:268rahtk93c37uml183316uaucvbn1bdlj@4ax.com...
>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:913l7hdn92o49d25fcqi7t0cdu6adi907i@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> But Jenny is a liar, and he will continue to lie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't think Jerry is intentionally telling his mistruths.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He may be entirely and undoubtely _wrong_ -- but if there is no intent
>>>>>>to deceive, does that make him a liar?
>>>>>
>>>>> I may have mentioned this before, but it's *possible* he has the
>>>>> intelligence quotient of a chipmunk. That, coupled with whatever
>>>>> mental aberrations consume him day and night, could result in the
>>>>> existence of someone who is basically unteachable or incapable of
>>>>> learning.
>>>>
>>>> Klous, the reason you think I'm lying when I'm actually NOT [..]
>>>
>>> Jenny, the reason I think you're lying is simple.
>>>
>>> You're lying.
>>
>>Wrong. Your ACCUSING me of lieying.
>
> That's because you *are* a liar, Jenny.

That's becouse it's much easier for you to screach
LIAR then it is to accept realty.

On Fri, 9 Sep 2022 14:33:37 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:8nbjdht8l32ni01r2b1rghsrt3udejq1mb@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 13:14:55 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:268rahtk93c37uml183316uaucvbn1bdlj@4ax.com...
>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:913l7hdn92o49d25fcqi7t0cdu6adi907i@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But Jenny is a liar, and he will continue to lie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't think Jerry is intentionally telling his mistruths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>He may be entirely and undoubtely _wrong_ -- but if there is no intent
>>>>>>>to deceive, does that make him a liar?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I may have mentioned this before, but it's *possible* he has the
>>>>>> intelligence quotient of a chipmunk. That, coupled with whatever
>>>>>> mental aberrations consume him day and night, could result in the
>>>>>> existence of someone who is basically unteachable or incapable of
>>>>>> learning.
>>>>>
>>>>> Klous, the reason you think I'm lying when I'm actually NOT [..]
>>>>
>>>> Jenny, the reason I think you're lying is simple.
>>>>
>>>> You're lying.
>>>
>>>Wrong. Your ACCUSING me of lieying.
>>
>> That's because you *are* a liar, Jenny.
>
>That's becouse it's much easier for you to screach
>LIAR then it is to accept realty.

You MAKE it easy since lying is just about all you do.

http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0mgugh1ih46ca6663k9cnjit31gmoaai5a@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 02:25:48 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:c2lgdh1lhv8jh08pddft6p8l5eint21569@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:25:24 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:ph7rah1em5eka2il0lc21ms7g10ho6abi5@4ax.com...
>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message
>>>>>>news:1sth7hp84gk74nmd6rec6tejbi8h03iau8@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2022 20:14:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>A lot of people have been asking lately whether or not Disney land
>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>public
>>>>>>>>or private property.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>After much thought, I have decided that it is PRIVATE property, due
>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>fact that there are gate's, and you have to pay a admission fee.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would be private property regardless of gates and admission fee,
>>>>>>> since it is not owned by the government.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>AS WE ALREADY DISCUSSED, GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
>>>>>>IT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual, you are lying. Government ownership has everything to do
>>>>> with if a property is public property or private property.
>>>>
>>>>No, Governmet ownership only determines WHO OWNS IT, not if it is public
>>>>or
>>>>now.
>>>
>>> Yes, Jenny. If it's owned by the government, it's ALWAYS pubic
>>> property.
>>
>>
>>So your saying that area 51 is public property?
>
> Yes, Jenny, Area 51 is Public Property.
>
>>How about teh sensitive area's of teh Pentagon?
>
> Yes, Jenny, the most sensitive and secret areas of the Pentagon are
> Public Property.
>
>>Or the president's bedroom?
>
> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>
> So is...
> The inside of Fort Knox
> CIA Headquarters
> The armory at Fort Bragg
> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
> Force Base, North Dakota.
>
> All public property.

The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a SELFIE
inside of them all

On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:09:30 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:0mgugh1ih46ca6663k9cnjit31gmoaai5a@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 02:25:48 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:c2lgdh1lhv8jh08pddft6p8l5eint21569@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:25:24 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:ph7rah1em5eka2il0lc21ms7g10ho6abi5@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>message
>>>>>>>news:1sth7hp84gk74nmd6rec6tejbi8h03iau8@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2022 20:14:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>A lot of people have been asking lately whether or not Disney land
>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>public
>>>>>>>>>or private property.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>After much thought, I have decided that it is PRIVATE property, due
>>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>fact that there are gate's, and you have to pay a admission fee.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would be private property regardless of gates and admission fee,
>>>>>>>> since it is not owned by the government.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>AS WE ALREADY DISCUSSED, GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
>>>>>>>IT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As usual, you are lying. Government ownership has everything to do
>>>>>> with if a property is public property or private property.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, Governmet ownership only determines WHO OWNS IT, not if it is public
>>>>>or
>>>>>now.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Jenny. If it's owned by the government, it's ALWAYS pubic
>>>> property.
>>>
>>>
>>>So your saying that area 51 is public property?
>>
>> Yes, Jenny, Area 51 is Public Property.
>>
>>>How about teh sensitive area's of teh Pentagon?
>>
>> Yes, Jenny, the most sensitive and secret areas of the Pentagon are
>> Public Property.
>>
>>>Or the president's bedroom?
>>
>> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>>
>> So is...
>> The inside of Fort Knox
>> CIA Headquarters
>> The armory at Fort Bragg
>> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
>> Force Base, North Dakota.
>>
>> All public property.
>
>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a SELFIE
>inside of them all
>

Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
you silly boy!

After all this time off line, you STILL don't know the difference
between public property and private property?

Even after I gave you the definitions?

I find that impossible to believe.

A more plausible explanation:

Jenny knows the difference, he's just lying to get attention.

On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 04:24:45 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>> All public property.
>>
>>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a SELFIE
>>inside of them all
>
>Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
>you silly boy!
>
>After all this time off line, you STILL don't know the difference
>between public property and private property?
>
>Even after I gave you the definitions?
>
>I find that impossible to believe.
>
>A more plausible explanation:
>
>Jenny knows the difference, he's just lying to get attention.

Jenny does know the difference. But his lying is a result of
mental health issues. Unless he makes a mistake, or thinks honesty
will advance a lie, he is unable to be honest.

--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.

"KWills" <laughing@you.heh> wrote in message
news:6jdcbi1mfgtrudivmrodl539c8n05ett6u@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 04:24:45 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>

>>I find that impossible to believe.
>>
>>A more plausible explanation:
>>
>>Jenny knows the difference, he's just lying to get attention.
>
> Jenny does know the difference. But his lying is a result of
> mental health issues.

Yawn.

On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:05:25 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <laughing@you.heh> wrote in message
>news:6jdcbi1mfgtrudivmrodl539c8n05ett6u@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 04:24:45 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>I find that impossible to believe.
>>>
>>>A more plausible explanation:
>>>
>>>Jenny knows the difference, he's just lying to get attention.
>>
>> Jenny does know the difference. But his lying is a result of
>> mental health issues.
>
>Yawn.

Ibid.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:u39abitba1266sm3iioolo9ng03hk2e6ha@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:09:30 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:0mgugh1ih46ca6663k9cnjit31gmoaai5a@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 02:25:48 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:c2lgdh1lhv8jh08pddft6p8l5eint21569@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:25:24 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message
>>>>>>news:ph7rah1em5eka2il0lc21ms7g10ho6abi5@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>message
>>>>>>>>news:1sth7hp84gk74nmd6rec6tejbi8h03iau8@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2022 20:14:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>A lot of people have been asking lately whether or not Disney land
>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>public
>>>>>>>>>>or private property.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>After much thought, I have decided that it is PRIVATE property,
>>>>>>>>>>due
>>>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>fact that there are gate's, and you have to pay a admission fee.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It would be private property regardless of gates and admission
>>>>>>>>> fee,
>>>>>>>>> since it is not owned by the government.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>AS WE ALREADY DISCUSSED, GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
>>>>>>>>IT.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As usual, you are lying. Government ownership has everything to do
>>>>>>> with if a property is public property or private property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, Governmet ownership only determines WHO OWNS IT, not if it is
>>>>>>public
>>>>>>or
>>>>>>now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, Jenny. If it's owned by the government, it's ALWAYS pubic
>>>>> property.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>So your saying that area 51 is public property?
>>>
>>> Yes, Jenny, Area 51 is Public Property.
>>>
>>>>How about teh sensitive area's of teh Pentagon?
>>>
>>> Yes, Jenny, the most sensitive and secret areas of the Pentagon are
>>> Public Property.
>>>
>>>>Or the president's bedroom?
>>>
>>> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>>>
>>> So is...
>>> The inside of Fort Knox
>>> CIA Headquarters
>>> The armory at Fort Bragg
>>> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
>>> Force Base, North Dakota.
>>>
>>> All public property.
>>
>>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a
>>SELFIE
>>inside of them all
>>
>
> Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
> you silly boy!

THEN HOW CAN THEY BE PUBLIC?????????????

On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:02:10 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:u39abitba1266sm3iioolo9ng03hk2e6ha@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...

>>>> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>>>>
>>>> So is...
>>>> The inside of Fort Knox
>>>> CIA Headquarters
>>>> The armory at Fort Bragg
>>>> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
>>>> Force Base, North Dakota.
>>>>
>>>> All public property.
>>>
>>>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a
>>>SELFIE
>>>inside of them all
>>>
>>
>> Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
>> you silly boy!
>
> THEN HOW CAN THEY BE PUBLIC?????????????
>
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========

[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[X] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, McDonald's says salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet

======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:02:10 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:24:44 +0000

Again you wait MONTHS to PROVE yourself the LIAR you are. Why?

>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:u39abitba1266sm3iioolo9ng03hk2e6ha@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:09:30 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message news:0mgugh1ih46ca6663k9cnjit31gmoaai5a@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 02:25:48 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message news:c2lgdh1lhv8jh08pddft6p8l5eint21569@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:25:24 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>message news:ph7rah1em5eka2il0lc21ms7g10ho6abi5@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>message news:1sth7hp84gk74nmd6rec6tejbi8h03iau8@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2022 20:14:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>A lot of people have been asking lately whether or not Disney land
>>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>public
>>>>>>>>>>>or private property.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>After much thought, I have decided that it is PRIVATE property,
>>>>>>>>>>>due
>>>>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>fact that there are gate's, and you have to pay a admission fee.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It would be private property regardless of gates and admission
>>>>>>>>>> fee,
>>>>>>>>>> since it is not owned by the government.
>>>>>>>>>

JENNY! Would you PLEASE restore whatever you screwed up in your
settings in regards to attribution? I realize this means having to
change back whatever it is you changed. Deal with it.

>>>>>>>>>AS WE ALREADY DISCUSSED, GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
>>>>>>>>>IT.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As usual, you are lying. Government ownership has everything to do
>>>>>>>> with if a property is public property or private property.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, Governmet ownership only determines WHO OWNS IT, not if it is
>>>>>>>public
>>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, Jenny. If it's owned by the government, it's ALWAYS pubic
>>>>>> property.
>>>>>
>>>>>So your saying that area 51 is public property?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Jenny, Area 51 is Public Property.
>>>>
>>>>>How about teh sensitive area's of teh Pentagon?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Jenny, the most sensitive and secret areas of the Pentagon are
>>>> Public Property.
>>>>
>>>>>Or the president's bedroom?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>>>>
>>>> So is...
>>>> The inside of Fort Knox
>>>> CIA Headquarters
>>>> The armory at Fort Bragg
>>>> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
>>>> Force Base, North Dakota.
>>>>
>>>> All public property.
>>>
>>>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a
>>>SELFIE inside of them all
>>
>> Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
>> you silly boy!
>
> THEN HOW CAN THEY BE PUBLIC?????????????

The definitions of public and private property have been posted
many times. There is no possible way you don't understand at this
point. You are simply proving, still, that you NEED to LIE. You can't
be honest unless you make a mistake. Intentional honesty, in any form,
is impossible for you.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:lgojpithpcji03h1is4sft57pos09t3ive@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:02:10 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:u39abitba1266sm3iioolo9ng03hk2e6ha@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>
>>>>> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>>>>>
>>>>> So is...
>>>>> The inside of Fort Knox
>>>>> CIA Headquarters
>>>>> The armory at Fort Bragg
>>>>> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
>>>>> Force Base, North Dakota.
>>>>>
>>>>> All public property.
>>>>
>>>>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a
>>>>SELFIE
>>>>inside of them all
>>>>
>>>
>>> Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
>>> you silly boy!
>>
>> THEN HOW CAN THEY BE PUBLIC?????????????

> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
> [X] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum

<sigh> ANSWER THE QUESTION klous instead of hiding from it.

On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:22:38 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:lgojpithpcji03h1is4sft57pos09t3ive@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:02:10 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:u39abitba1266sm3iioolo9ng03hk2e6ha@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>
>>>>>> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So is...
>>>>>> The inside of Fort Knox
>>>>>> CIA Headquarters
>>>>>> The armory at Fort Bragg
>>>>>> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
>>>>>> Force Base, North Dakota.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All public property.
>>>>>
>>>>>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a
>>>>>SELFIE
>>>>>inside of them all
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
>>>> you silly boy!
>>>
>>> THEN HOW CAN THEY BE PUBLIC?????????????
>
>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>> [X] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum
>
><sigh> ANSWER THE QUESTION klous instead of hiding from it.

I've already explained to you what Public property is, quite a number
of times.

Here is the definition of private property:

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
person or company, rather than to a government.

Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
Is this definition correct?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

If your answer is no, supply a verifiable citation from another
dictionary which refutes this definition.

If you don't, we'll assume none exists, and you now admit that
restaurants are NOT owned by the government and are, therefore,
private property.

Put your verifiable cite here ----->

On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:22:38 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:lgojpithpcji03h1is4sft57pos09t3ive@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:02:10 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:u39abitba1266sm3iioolo9ng03hk2e6ha@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>
>>>>>> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So is...
>>>>>> The inside of Fort Knox
>>>>>> CIA Headquarters
>>>>>> The armory at Fort Bragg
>>>>>> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
>>>>>> Force Base, North Dakota.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All public property.
>>>>>
>>>>>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a
>>>>>SELFIE
>>>>>inside of them all
>>>>
>>>> Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
>>>> you silly boy!
>>>
>>> THEN HOW CAN THEY BE PUBLIC?????????????
>
>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>> [X] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum
>
><sigh> ANSWER THE QUESTION klous instead of hiding from it.

Asked AND answered. Why LIE and claim it has not been? I really
want to know what forces you to LIE. Not that you can be honest and
state why. If you don't run away from your lie, you will add more lies
to it.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
news:biav0j1cm8dk2ro0k4o37gulo15eo7lfbv@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:22:38 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:lgojpithpcji03h1is4sft57pos09t3ive@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:02:10 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:u39abitba1266sm3iioolo9ng03hk2e6ha@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So is...
>>>>>>> The inside of Fort Knox
>>>>>>> CIA Headquarters
>>>>>>> The armory at Fort Bragg
>>>>>>> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
>>>>>>> Force Base, North Dakota.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All public property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a
>>>>>>SELFIE
>>>>>>inside of them all
>>>>>
>>>>> Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
>>>>> you silly boy!
>>>>
>>>> THEN HOW CAN THEY BE PUBLIC?????????????
>>
>>
>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>> [X] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum
>>
>><sigh> ANSWER THE QUESTION klous instead of hiding from it.
>
> I really want to know what forces you to LIE.

Yawn.

On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 00:39:37 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:biav0j1cm8dk2ro0k4o37gulo15eo7lfbv@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:22:38 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:lgojpithpcji03h1is4sft57pos09t3ive@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:02:10 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:u39abitba1266sm3iioolo9ng03hk2e6ha@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, Jenny, the President's Bedroom is Public Property.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So is...
>>>>>>>> The inside of Fort Knox
>>>>>>>> CIA Headquarters
>>>>>>>> The armory at Fort Bragg
>>>>>>>> The missile launch control room at 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air
>>>>>>>> Force Base, North Dakota.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All public property.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The why don't you PROVE IT by going to all these place's and taking a
>>>>>>>SELFIE
>>>>>>>inside of them all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because I would not be allowed inside those public properties, Jenny,
>>>>>> you silly boy!
>>>>>
>>>>> THEN HOW CAN THEY BE PUBLIC?????????????
>>>
>>>
>>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>> [X] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum
>>>
>>><sigh> ANSWER THE QUESTION klous instead of hiding from it.
>>
>> I really want to know what forces you to LIE.
>>
>>[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]
>
>Yawn.
>

Ibid.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2